Radiation Protection 140

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Radiation Protection 140 EUROPEAN COMMISSION Radiation Protection 140 Cosmic Radiation Exposure of Aircraft Crew Compilation of Measured and Calculated Data Final Report of EURADOS WG 5 to the Group of Experts established under Article 31 of the Euratom treaty Directorate-General for Energy and Transport Directorate H — Nuclear Energy Unit H.4 — Radiation Protection 2004 This report was produced by the European Radiation Dosimetry Group (EURADOS) for the European Commission and represents that organisation’s views on the subject matter. These views have not been adopted or in any way approved by the Commission and should not be relied upon as a statement of the Commission’s views. The European Commission does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this report, nor does it accept responsibility for any use made thereof. Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union New freephone number: 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 A great deal of additional information on the European Union is available on the Internet. It can be accessed through the Europa server (http://europa.eu.int). Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2004 ISBN 92-894-8448-9 © European Communities, 2004 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. Printed in Belgium PRINTED ON WHITE CHLORINE-FREE BLEACHED PAPER Text completed on 20 May 2004 FOREWORD Already in 1913, the Nobel Prize winner Victor F. Hess discovered and described the ionising radiation of cosmic origin. The technical developments of civil aviation, supersonic flights and space travel, together with more accurate knowledge about cosmic radiation, motivated in 1966 the International Commission on Radiological Protection, ICRP, to consider the biological effects of the varying solar radiation and the relatively constant galactic radiation, and to recommend for aircrew preventive measures in specific cases. The 1990 ICRP Recommendations stated that exposures to cosmic radiation during flight in jet aircraft should be included as part of occupational exposure of aircrew. With the protection of aircrew, a new occupational radiation protection area was opened with many unknown parameters. Therefore, in 1991, the Radiation Protection Unit jointly with scientific experts in this field, the aviation companies, regulatory bodies and the social partners developed a work programme aimed at laying down appropriate European radiation protection legislation and to ensure its uniform conversion into practical radiation protection measures. From the beginning of this work programme, the association of institutes in the European Dosimetry Group, EURADOS, provided considerable expertise and co-ordinated important research projects. The 1996 European Council Directive on the protection of the workers and the general public against the dangers arising from ionising radiation allows for the 1990 ICRP recommendations. Specific requirements are incorporated into this European radiation protection legislation aimed at establishing a radiological protection system for aircrew. This report, prepared by a specific EURADOS Working Group delivers the successful conclusion of the above mentioned work programme. The European Commission thanks EURADOS for the intensive support and in particular the scientists and experts for their personal efforts. Their strong commitment was essential for the success of the entire work programme. Indispensable for achieving the envisaged objectives was also the constructive dialogue between the group of experts established pursuant to Article 31 of the Euratom Treaty and EURADOS. As a result of this fruitful co-operation, the now presented publication provides guidelines, recommendations and practical solutions for applying radiological protection measures for air crew exposed to cosmic radiation, based on the most recent scientific knowledge. Augustin JANSSENS Head of Unit Cosmic Radiation Exposure of Aircraft Crew Compilation of Measured and Calculated Data A Report of EURADOS WG 5 to Group of Experts established under Article 31 of the EURATOM Treaty Edited by L. Lindborg, D. T. Bartlett, P. Beck, I. R. McAulay, K. Schnuer, H. Schraube and F. Spurný European Radiation Dosimetry Group EURADOS Working Group 5 on Aircraft Crew Exposure D.T. Bartlett1, P. Beck2, P. Bilski3, J.-F. Bottollier-Depois4, L. Lindborg5 (Chairman from 2003), H. Schraube6, F. Spurný7 and F. Wissmann8, E. Felsberger9 (resigned in 2002), W. Heinrich10, B. Lewis11, D. O´Sullivan12, G. Reitz13, U. Schrewe14 (Chairman 2000 to 2002), and L. Tommasino15, G. Dietze8 for Article 31, I. McAulay16 for Article 31, J. Siedenburg17 (2004) and A. Ruge (2000 –2003) for JAA, K. Schnuer18 for EC and K. Ulbak19 for Article 31. Contributions were also received from: J.C. Saez-Vergara(20), H. Roos(21), G.A. Taylor(22), R. Grillmaier(23), W. Friedberg(24), K. O’Brien(25), M. Pelliccioni(26), B. Wiegel(8) and their colleagues. (1) National Radiological Protection Board (NRPB), Chilton Didcot, UK (2) ARC Seibersdorf Research (ARCS), Seibersdorf, Austria (3) Institute of Nuclear Physics, Krakow, Poland (4) Institute for Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety (IRSN) , Paris, France (5) Swedish Radiation Protection Authority (SSI), Stockholm, Sweden (6) Forschungszentrum für Umwelt und Gesundheit (GSF), Institut für Strahlenschutz, Neuherberg, Germany (7) Nuclear Physics Institute, Academy of Sciences of Czech Republic, Prague (8) Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB), Braunschweig, Germany (9) IASON Labormedizin GesmbH. & Co KG, Austria (10) Universität, Siegen, Germany (11) Royal Military College of Canada (RMC), Kingston, Ontario, Canada (12) Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies (DIAS), Dublin, Ireland (13) Deutsches Zentrum für Luft und Raumfahrt (DLR), Institut für Luft- und Raumfahrtmedizin, Köln, Germany (14) Fachhochschule, Hannover, Germany (15) National Agency for Environmental Protection and Technical Services (APAT), Rome, Italy (16) Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland (17) Central Joint Aviation Authority (JAA), Hoofdorp, The Netherlands (18) European Commission, DG TREN H4, Luxembourg (19) Statens Institut for Straalehygiejne (SIS), Knapholm, Denmark (20) CIEMAT, Dosimetría de Radiaciones, Madrid, Spain (21) Radiobiologisches Institut, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Germany (22) National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, U.K. (23) Fachrichtung Biophysik, Universität des Saarlandes, Homburg/Saar, Germany (24) Civil Aerospace Medical Institute, Federal Aviation Administration, Oklahoma City, USA (25) Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA (26) INFN, Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, Frascati, Italy Cosmic Radiation Exposure of Aircraft Crew: Compilation of Measured and Calculated Data Contents Preface iii Chapter I Introduction I.1 General Introduction 1 I.2 Working Group 5 progress 1 I.3 Legal considerations 2 I.4 Quantities 3 I.5 The collection of material for the report 4 I.6 Content of the report 4 I.7 References 4 Chapter II Cosmic radiation environment at aircraft altitudes and dosimetry II.1 Cosmic radiation 7 II.2 Radiation dose components at aviation altitudes 10 II.3 Measurement requirements 12 II.4 Dose calculations 13 II.5 References 14 Chapter III Measured and calculated ambient dose equivalent rate data at aircraft altitudes III.1 In-flight measurements 16 III.2 Comparison of time differential data 18 III.3 Results 20 III.4 Conclusion 54 III.5 References 54 Chapter IV Comparison of calculated and measured route doses and selected dose rate data for scheduled flights IV.1 Introduction 57 IV.2 Basic conditions 58 IV.3 In-flight measurement results and comparison with calculations 58 IV.4 Calculated doses of scheduled flights 82 IV.5 Solar modulation effects 83 IV.6 Influence of flight altitude and solar modulation to route doses 86 IV.7 Comparison of calculated dose rates with selected experimental findings 88 IV.8 References 95 Chapter V Uncertainties in aircraft crew dose assessments V.1 Introduction 96 V.2 Radiation protection requirements on the estimation of the effective dose 96 V.3 Uncertainties related to measurements and calculations 96 V.3.1 General requirements 96 V.3.2 Reported instrument and detector characteristics 97 V.3.3 Measurement statistical uncertainties (Type A) 97 V.3.4 Measurement Type B uncertainties 99 V.4 Variations of flight profiles 99 V.5 Uncertainties related to calculations 100 V.6 Conclusions 101 V.7 References 101 Chapter VI Summary, conclusions and recommendations VI.1 Summary 103 VI.2 Conclusions 105 VI.3 Recommendations 105 VI.4 Future work 107 VI.5 Acknowledgements 108 VI.6 References 108 Appendix A Descriptions of measurement methods A 1 Royal Military College of Canada (RMC) 109 A 2 National Radiological Protection Board (NRPB) 114 A 3 Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN) 123 A 4 Department of Radiation Dosimetry, Nuclear Physics Institute, Academy of Science of the Czech Republic (NPI) 124 A 5 Swedish Radiation Protection Authority (SSI) 131 A 6 Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies (DIAS) 137 A 7 CIEMAT, Servicio de Protección Radiológica, Madrid 142 A 8 University Kiel and DLR Cologne: DOSTEL 147 A 9 Physikalisch Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB) I 151 A 10 ARC Seibersdorf Research (ARCS) 158 A 11 Agenzia Nazionale per la Protezione dell’Ambiente (APAT): ANPA-Stack 169 A 12 Aviation Radiobiological Institute University of Munich 185 A 13 GSF - National Research Center for Environment and Health, Institute of Radiation Protection 189 A 14 National Physical
Recommended publications
  • Observing On-Demand Aircrew Transitioning from Paper to Electronic
    Wright State University CORE Scholar International Symposium on Aviation International Symposium on Aviation Psychology - 2021 Psychology 5-1-2021 Observing on-Demand Aircrew Transitioning From Paper to Electronic Charla L. Long Kevin M. Gildea Follow this and additional works at: https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/isap_2021 Part of the Other Psychiatry and Psychology Commons Repository Citation Long, C. L., & Gildea, K. M. (2021). Observing on-Demand Aircrew Transitioning From Paper to Electronic. 66th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, 152-157. https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/isap_2021/26 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the International Symposium on Aviation Psychology at CORE Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in International Symposium on Aviation Psychology - 2021 by an authorized administrator of CORE Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. OBSERVING ON-DEMAND AIRCREW TRANSITIONING FROM PAPER TO ELECTRONIC FLIGHT BAGS: THE IMPACT ON WORKLOAD Charla L. Long, Ph.D. Federal Aviation Administration Oklahoma City, OK Kevin M. Gildea, Ph.D. Federal Aviation Administration Oklahoma City, OK The introduction of electronic flight bags (EFBs) for flight crew use has reduced the overall workload, except in some situations if not designed properly or employed effectively. Researchers from the Civil Aerospace Medical Institute (CAMI) undertook an observational study combined with crew interviews to assess overall flight crew operations including flight demands, procedures, and the methods the crews used to integrate EFBs into all aspects of their flights from preflight planning to postflight debrief. The researchers also examined the EFB applications (apps) themselves for general usability and developed some recommendations for ways EFB use in operations could be improved.
    [Show full text]
  • RCED-91-152 Meeting the Aviation Challenges of the 1990S
    144321I I Preface In the past, we have reported on a wide variety of complex and contro- versial aviation issues, including the Federal Aviation Administration’s (FAA) modernization of the nation’s air traffic control system, the training needs of air traffic controllers and the staffing needs of that work force, FAA'S oversight of aviation safety, improvements in airport security, aircraft noise, and airline competition. Although the Congress, the Department of Transportation (nor), and FAA have taken positive actions on these issues, some will remain problematic. At the same time, new problems will develop to challenge the effectiveness of the nation’s aviation system. To better understand and deal with the long-standing aviation issues and to examine emerging issues, we convened a conference on November 29 and 30,199O. The conference brought together 23 leading aviation experts from the Congress, the administration, the aviation industry, and academia to provide their perspectives on the problems facing the aviation community. To help the speakers frame these issues, in advance of the conference we suggested general topics for them to discuss, including (1) FAA'S organization and management, (2) airspace management and air traffic control, (3) aviation safety, (4) airport capacity and security, and (5) airline competition and consumer protec- tion. The conference speakers not only brought new understanding to these subjects, but also raised major points for the Congress, DOI', and FAA to consider when addressing both long-standing and new problems facing the aviation system. Consequently, we are issuing this report to make the results of the conference and the speakers’ presentations available to a larger audience.
    [Show full text]
  • Principles of Great Geomagnetic Storms Forcasting by Online Cosmic Ray Data L
    Space weather and dangerous phenomena on the Earth: principles of great geomagnetic storms forcasting by online cosmic ray data L. I. Dorman To cite this version: L. I. Dorman. Space weather and dangerous phenomena on the Earth: principles of great geomagnetic storms forcasting by online cosmic ray data. Annales Geophysicae, European Geosciences Union, 2005, 23 (9), pp.2997-3002. hal-00317980 HAL Id: hal-00317980 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00317980 Submitted on 22 Nov 2005 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Annales Geophysicae, 23, 2997–3002, 2005 SRef-ID: 1432-0576/ag/2005-23-2997 Annales © European Geosciences Union 2005 Geophysicae Space weather and dangerous phenomena on the Earth: principles of great geomagnetic storms forcasting by online cosmic ray data L. I. Dorman1,2 1Israel Cosmic Ray and Space Weather Center and Emilio Segre’ Observatory, affiliated to Tel Aviv University, Technion and Israel Space Agency, P. O. Box 2217, Qazrin 12900, Israel 2Cosmic Ray Department of IZMIRAN, Russian Academy of Science, Troitsk 142092, Moscow Region, Russia Received: 25 February 2005 – Revised: 24 May 2005 – Accepted: 28 May 2005 – Published: 22 November 2005 Part of Special Issue “1st European Space Weather Week (ESWW)” Abstract.
    [Show full text]
  • Increasing Aircrew Flight Equipment Personnel
    C O R P O R A T I O N CHAITRA M. HARDISON, LESLIE ADRIENNE PAYNE, RUSSELL H. WILLIAMS, DANIELLE BEAN, KENRIC SMITH, HANNAH ACHESON-FIELD, IVICA PAVISIC, ANTHONY LAWRENCE, BENJAMIN M. PANCOAST Increasing Aircrew Flight Equipment Personnel Proficiency Insights from Members of the Career Field For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RRA114-1 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-1-9774-0675-0 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © 2021 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Cover: U.S. Air Force photo by Airman 1st Class Isaiah Miller. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect
    [Show full text]
  • Wake Turbulence Mitigation for Arrivals (Wtma)
    26TH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF THE AERONAUTICAL SCIENCES WAKE TURBULENCE MITIGATION FOR ARRIVALS (WTMA) Daniel Williams, Gary Lohr NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, Virginia, USA Keywords: Wake, Vortex, Turbulence, CSPR, Arrivals Abstract Approach Procedures (IAPs). While instrument approaches are often used in visual conditions, The preliminary Wake Turbulence Mitigation an airport’s acceptance rate is degraded when for Arrivals (WTMA) concept of operations is the weather forces instrument-only conditions described in this paper. The WTMA concept for aircraft navigation and traffic separation, and provides further detail to work initiated by the ATC must control aircraft according to radar Wake Vortex Avoidance System Concept and wake separation standards. Evaluation Team and is an evolution of the This paper includes a background of the Wake Turbulence Mitigation for Departure current or state-of-the-art of operational concept. Anticipated benefits about reducing procedures including applicable research, and wake turbulence separation standards in cross- then provides a description of the WTMA wind conditions, and candidate WTMA system concept and system architecture considerations considerations are discussed. to improve those procedures for NextGen traffic projections. Finally future research efforts and 1 Introduction/Background recommendations are described. The authors are passionate about supporting operators with The current air traffic system is not prepared for appropriate technology and procedures, so this the two- to three-fold increase in traffic paper includes that perspective. projected for the 2025 time-frame [1]. Current system limitations, procedures, and the absence of automation-based tools define a highly 1.1 CSPR Description constrained environment. To cope with future Closely Spaced Parallel Runways (CSPRs) are traffic demands, fundamental changes are defined as runways whose centerlines are required to effectively manage traffic and separated by less than 2500’ [3].
    [Show full text]
  • National Aviation Safety and Management Plan 2019–2020
    United States Department of Agriculture National Aviation Safety and Management Plan 2019–2020 Forest Service March 2019 In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by: (1) mail: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Forbush Decreases and Turbulence Levels at Coronal Mass Ejection Fronts
    A&A 494, 1107–1118 (2009) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:200809551 & c ESO 2009 Astrophysics Forbush decreases and turbulence levels at coronal mass ejection fronts P. Subramanian1,H.M.Antia2,S.R.Dugad2,U.D.Goswami2,S.K.Gupta2, Y. Hayashi3, N. Ito3,S.Kawakami3, H. Kojima4,P.K.Mohanty2,P.K.Nayak2, T. Nonaka3,A.Oshima3, K. Sivaprasad2,H.Tanaka2, and S. C. Tonwar2 (The GRAPES-3 collaboration) 1 Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Sai Trinity Building, Pashan, Pune 411021, India 2 Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Homi Bhabha Road, Mumbai 400005, India e-mail: [email protected] 3 Graduate School of Science, Osaka City University, Osaka 558-8585, Japan 4 Nagoya Women’s University, Nagoya 467-8610, Japan Received 11 February 2008 / Accepted 25 October 2008 ABSTRACT Aims. We seek to estimate the average level of MHD turbulence near coronal mass ejection (CME) fronts as they propagate from the SuntotheEarth. Methods. We examined the cosmic ray data from the GRAPES-3 tracking muon telescope at Ooty, together with the data from other sources for three closely observed Forbush decrease events. Each of these event is associated with frontside halo coronal mass ejections (CMEs) and near-Earth magnetic clouds. The associated Forbush decreases are therefore expected to have significant contributions from the cosmic-ray depressions inside the CMEs/ejecta. In each case, we estimate the magnitude of the Forbush decrease using a simple model for the diffusion of high-energy protons through the largely closed field lines enclosing the CME as it expands and propagates from the Sun to the Earth.
    [Show full text]
  • Does Local Structure Within Shock-Sheath and Magnetic
    Prepared for submission to arXiv Does Local Structure Within Shock-sheath and Magnetic Cloud Affect Cosmic Ray Decrease? Anil Raghav,a,1 Zubair Shaikh,a Ankush Bhaskar,b,1 Gauri Datar,a Geeta Vichareb aUniversity Department of Physics, University of Mumbai, Vidyanagari, Santacruz (E), Mumbai-400098, India bIndian Institute of Geomagnetism, New Panvel, Navi Mumbai- 410218, India. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected], Abstract. The sudden short duration decrease in cosmic ray flux is known as Forbush decrease which is mainly caused by interplanetary disturbances. A generally accepted view is that the first step of Forbush decrease is due to shock sheath and second step is due to magnetic cloud (MC) of interplanetary coronal mass ejection (ICME). This simplistic picture does not consider several physical aspects, such as, whether the complete shock-sheath or MC (or only part of these) are contributing to the decrease, what effect does the internal structure within the shock-sheath region / MC have on the decrease, etc. We present a summary of the analysis of a total of 18 large (≥ 8%) Forbush decrease events and the associated ICMEs, a majority of which show multiple steps in the Forbush decrease profile. We propose a re-classification of Forbush decrease events depending upon the number of steps observed in their respective profile, and the physical origin of these steps. Our analysis clearly indicates that not only broad regions (shock-sheath and MC), but also localized structures within the shock-sheath and MC, have a very significant role in influencing the Forbush decrease profile. The arXiv:1608.03772v2 [astro-ph.HE] 24 Aug 2016 detailed analysis in the present work is expected to contribute toward understanding the relationship between FD and ICME parameters in better way.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1712.07301V1 [Physics.Space-Ph] 19 Dec 2017
    Confidential manuscript submitted to JGR-Space Physics Using Forbush decreases to derive the transit time of ICMEs propagating from 1 AU to Mars Johan L. Freiherr von Forstner1, Jingnan Guo1, Robert F. Wimmer-Schweingruber1, Donald M. Hassler2;3, Manuela Temmer4, Mateja Dumbović4, Lan K. Jian5;6, Jan K. Appel1, Jaša Čalogović7, Bent Ehresmann2, Bernd Heber1, Henning Lohf1, Arik Posner8, Christian T. Steigies1, Bojan Vršnak7, and Cary J. Zeitlin9 1Institute of Experimental and Applied Physics, University of Kiel, Germany 2Southwest Research Institute, Boulder, Colorado, USA 3Institut d’Astrophysique Spatiale, University Paris Sud, Orsay, France 4Institute of Physics, University of Graz, Austria 5University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA 6NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA 7Hvar Observatory, Faculty of Geodesy, University of Zagreb, Croatia 8NASA Headquarters, Washington, DC, USA 9Leidos, Houston, Texas, USA Key Points: • The interplanetary propagation of 15 CMEs is studied based on a cross-correlation analysis of Forbush decreases at 1 AU and Mars. • The speed evolutions of the ICMEs are derived from observations, indicating that most of them are slightly decelerated even beyond 1 AU. • Model-predicted ICME arrival times at Mars could be improved by using ICME pa- rameters measured at 1 AU. arXiv:1712.07301v1 [physics.space-ph] 19 Dec 2017 Corresponding author: J. Guo, [email protected] –1– Confidential manuscript submitted to JGR-Space Physics Abstract The propagation of 15 interplanetary coronal mass ejections (ICMEs) from Earth’s orbit (1 AU) to Mars ( 1.5 AU) has been studied with their propagation speed estimated from ∼ both measurements and simulations. The enhancement of magnetic fields related to ICMEs and their shock fronts cause the so-called Forbush decrease, which can be detected as a re- duction of galactic cosmic rays measured on-ground.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Forbush Decreases Observed Using a Muon Telescope in Antarctica Starting on 21 June 2015 *
    Chinese Physics C Vol. 42, No. 12 (2018) 125001 Analysis of Forbush decreases observed using a muon telescope in Antarctica starting on 21 June 2015 * De-Hong Huang(黄德宏)1;1) Hong-Qiao Hu(胡红桥)1 Ji-Long Zhang(张吉龙)2;2) Hong Lu(卢红)2 Da-Li Zhang(张大力)2 Bin-Shen Xue(薛炳森)3 Jing-Tian Lu(吕景天)3 1 SOA Key Laboratory for Polar Science, Polar Research Institute of China, Shanghai 200136, China 2 Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Beijing 100049, China 3 Key Laboratory of Space Weather, National Center for Space Weather, China Meteorological Administration, Beijing 10081, China Abstract: A cosmic-ray muon telescope has been collecting data since the end of 2014, which was shortly after the telescope was built in the Zhongshan Station of Antarctica. The telescope is the first observation device to be built by Chinese scientists in Antarctica. The pressure change is very strong in Zhongshan station. The count rate of the pressure correction results shows that the large variations in the count rate are likely caused by pressure fluctuations. During the period from 18 June to 22 June 2015, four halo coronal mass ejections (CMEs) were ejected from the Sun. These CMEs initiated a series of Forbush decreases (FD) when they reached the Earth. We conducted a comprehensive study of the intensity fluctuations of galactic cosmic rays recorded during FDs. The intensity fluctuations used in this study were collected by cosmic ray detectors of multiple stations (Zhongshan, McMurdo, South Polar, and Nagoya), and the solar wind measurements were collected by ACE and WIND.
    [Show full text]
  • Cabin Safety Subject Index
    Cabin Safety Subject Index This document is prepared as part of the FAA Flight Standards Cabin Safety Inspector Program. For additional information about this document or the program contact: Donald Wecklein Pacific Certificate Management Office 7181 Amigo Street Las Vegas, NV 89119 [email protected] Jump to Table of Contents Rev. 43 Get familiar with the Cabin Safety Subject Index The Cabin Safety Subject Index (CSSI) is a reference guide to Federal Regulations, FAA Orders, Advisory Circulars, Information for Operators (InFO), Safety Alerts for Operators (SAFO), legal interpretations, and other FAA related content related to cabin safety. Subscribe to updates If you would like to receive updates to the Cabin Safety Subject Index whenever it’s revised, click here: I want to subscribe and receive updates. This is a free service. You will receive an automated response acknowledging your request. You may unsubscribe at any time. Getting around within the CSSI The CSSI structure is arranged in alphabetical order by subject, and the document has direct links to the subject matter, as well as links within the document for ease of navigation. The Table of Contents contains a hyperlinked list of all subjects covered within the CSSI. • Clicking the topic brings you to the desired subject. • Clicking the subject brings you back to the Table of Contents. • Next to some subjects you will see (also see xxxxxxxx). These are related subjects. Click on the “also see” subject and it will bring you directly to that subject. • Clicking on hyperlinked content will bring you directly to the desired content.
    [Show full text]
  • Pos(ICRC2019)045 FORBUSH DECREASE FORBUSH Cosmic Ray Intensity, Forbush Decrease, Coronal Mass 2 1
    INTERPLANETARY MAGNETIC FIELD PARAMETERS AFFECTING COSMIC RAY FORBUSH DECREASE M. L. Chauhan1 Department of Physics, Govt. Model Science College PoS(ICRC2019)045 Jabalpur, M.P., INDIA E-mail: [email protected] M.K.Richharia2 Department of Physics, Govt. Model Science College Jabalpur, M.P., INDIA B.K.Soni3 Government Girls College, Bilaspur (C.G.), INDIA. Abstract Coronal mass ejections (CMEs) hurl huge volumes of magnetized plasma into interplanetary space often referred to as ICMEs or ejecta. They are an important component of solar wind and can cause enhanced geomagnetic activity when they interact with the Earth’s magnetosphere. When the ejecta have an average speed greater than the upstream solar wind speed they create a shock. The large IMF variations due to interplanetary shocks cause depression in the cosmic ray intensity (CRI) called Forbush Decrease (FD). Large Fds caused by fast CMEs are specifically associated with energetic X-ray flares. In the present paper, the author has studied seven largest Forbush decrease events selected from Moscow Neutron Monitor Station during a period of twelve years (1996- 2008), i.e., 23rd solar cycle. The analysis of CRI data with interplanetary magnetic field |B|, its southward component Bz, solar wind velocity, Kp and Dst indices shows that all the three phenomena- solar, interplanetary and geomagnetic are connected to FD. The relationship between interplanetary parameters and FDs is discussed in detail. Moreover the solar cycle effect is found to be slightly shifted for large FDs as the frequency of occurrence of major FD events is more in the descending phase of the solar cycle.
    [Show full text]