DOCSLIB.ORG

Tracking a CME and SIR to Earth and Mars During the Deep Minimum of Solar Cycle 24

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Tracking a CME and SIR to Earth and Mars During the Deep Minimum of Solar Cycle 24 12/2/2020 AGU - iPosterSessions.com Tracking a CME and SIR to Earth and Mars during the deep minimum of Solar Cycle 24 E. Palmerio (1,2), C. O. Lee (1), I. G. Richardson (3,4), N. V. Nitta (5), M. L. Mays (4), J. S. Halekas (6), C. Zeitlin (7), J. G. Luhmann (1), S. Xu (1) (1) Space Sciences Laboratory, University of California–Berkeley, (2) CPAESS, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research, (3) Department of Astronomy, University of Maryland, (4) Heliospheric Physics Division, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, (5) Lockheed Martin Solar and Astrophysics Laboratory, (6) Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Iowa, (7) Leidos Innovations Corporation https://agu2020fallmeeting-agu.ipostersessions.com/Default.aspx?s=2E-1B-8E-DA-65-11-86-90-4E-E3-4A-CC-C9-B6-68-C6&pdfprint=true&guestview=true 1/14 12/2/2020 AGU - iPosterSessions.com PRESENTED AT: https://agu2020fallmeeting-agu.ipostersessions.com/Default.aspx?s=2E-1B-8E-DA-65-11-86-90-4E-E3-4A-CC-C9-B6-68-C6&pdfprint=true&guestview=true 2/14 12/2/2020 AGU - iPosterSessions.com BACKGROUND Interplanetary coronal mass ejections (ICMEs) and stream interactions regions (SIRs) are large-scale solar wind structures responsible for space weather disturbances at Earth and the other planets (e.g., Zhang et al. 2007). Their occurrence usually depends on the phase of the solar cycle, with ICMEs being more frequent during solar maximum and SIRs dominating during solar minimum. Thus, periods of solar minimum are usually regarded as particularly suitable for following solar transients through the heliosphere, since they are often characterised by single-ICME events that can more or less easily be tracked back to their solar source. In this study, we follow a coronal mass ejection (CME) and solar wind high-speed stream (HSS) that occurred in August 2018, i.e. during the minimum of Solar Cycle 24. In particular, we analyse their in-situ signatures at Earth and Mars, which were nearly radially aligned. The configuration of the inner heliosphere during the period under study is shown in Figure 1. Figure 1. Positions and orbits of the inner planets and location of the STEREO-A spacecraft on 20 August 2018. Earth and Mars were separated by 2° in latitude and 8° in longitude. https://agu2020fallmeeting-agu.ipostersessions.com/Default.aspx?s=2E-1B-8E-DA-65-11-86-90-4E-E3-4A-CC-C9-B6-68-C6&pdfprint=true&guestview=true 3/14 12/2/2020 AGU - iPosterSessions.com SOLAR OBSERVATIONS The events that we focus on in this study commenced on 20 August 2018. A CME erupted around 08:00 UT from a quiet-Sun region in the northern hemisphere, located close to the central meridian from Earth’s perspective. The eruption involved the disappearance of a filament and the presence of weak dimmings and post-eruption arcades. This event has been analysed in several previous studies (e.g., Chen et al. 2019; Mishra and Srivastava 2019; Abunin et al. 2020; Piersanti et al. 2020). An overview of the various solar observations on 20 August is shown in Figure 2. Figure 2. Overview of solar observations on 20 August 2018. (a) SDO/AIA 193 Å image just before the CME eruption, showing the filament (F) involved in the eruption and the two coronal holes (CH1 and CH2) on either side. (b) SOHO/LASCO/C2 difference image, showing the 20 August CME. (d) Same as (b), but from the STEREO/SECCHI/COR2-A perspective. (c) and (e) Same as (b) and (d), but with the reconstructed GCS shell overlaid. Figure 2(a) shows an SDO image of the solar disc a couple hours before the CME onset. The filament involved in the eruption (marked as 'F') is rooted between two coronal holes (CHs), one to the southwest (marked as 'CH1') and one to the northeast (marked as 'CH2'). Figure 2(b)–(e) shows the 20 August 2018 CME in the solar corona observed in white light by the SOHO and STEREO-A spacecraft. In two panels, coronagraph data are overlaid with the reconstructed CME wireframe obtained using the Graduated Cylindrical Shell (GCS; Thernisien 2011) model. According to GCS results, the CME was relatively narrow (~45°), slow (<400 km/s), and directed 10° west and 6° north of the Sun–Earth line, suggesting possible impacts at both Earth and Mars (see Figure 1). https://agu2020fallmeeting-agu.ipostersessions.com/Default.aspx?s=2E-1B-8E-DA-65-11-86-90-4E-E3-4A-CC-C9-B6-68-C6&pdfprint=true&guestview=true 4/14 12/2/2020 AGU - iPosterSessions.com MEASUREMENTS AT EARTH The first location where we evaluate an impact of the 20 August 2018 CME is Earth. We combine solar wind measurements from Earth's Lagrange L1 point with ground-based observations and data taken from lunar orbit. In-situ magnetic field, plasma, and particle measurements at Earth, together with geomagnetic indices, are shown in Figure 3. https://agu2020fallmeeting-agu.ipostersessions.com/Default.aspx?s=2E-1B-8E-DA-65-11-86-90-4E-E3-4A-CC-C9-B6-68-C6&pdfprint=true&guestview=true 5/14 12/2/2020 AGU - iPosterSessions.com Figure 3. In-situ measurements at Earth. The grey vertical line indicates the passage of the leading edge of the sheath region of the 20 August CME, followed by its magnetic cloud ejecta (shaded in light grey). The CME–HSS interaction region is shaded in dark grey. The pink vertical line indicates the interplanetary shock driven by a preceding, small CME, followed by its ejecta (shaded in pink). Data are taken from the Wind and ACE spacecraft at Earth's Lagrange L1 point, the LRO spacecraft orbiting the Moon, and the NMDB, WDC Kyoto, and NGDC facilities on ground. Observations at Earth indicate that a small ICME (marked in pink in Figure 3) preceded the ICME related to the 20 August eruption (marked in grey in Figure 3). The "main" ICME arrived on 25 August 2018 and was associated with clear magnetic cloud signatures (see Burlaga et al. 1981), relatively slow speeds (~400 km/s) and a weak Forbush decrease (panels l–m, ~2% variation both measured in space by LRO and by high-latitude neutron monitors on Earth). Nevertheless, its strong, sustained southward BZ component resulted in the third most intense geomagnetic storm of Solar Cycle 24 in terms of the Dst index (Dstmin = –174 nT). Furthermore, the ICME magnetic-cloud ejecta is followed by an interaction region (marked in dark grey in Figure 3) with the following HSS. This indicates that the 20 August CME was compressed and "pushed" by the HSS emanating from the CH in the northern hemisphere ('CH2' in Figure 2), which in turn enhanced its geoeffectiveness. https://agu2020fallmeeting-agu.ipostersessions.com/Default.aspx?s=2E-1B-8E-DA-65-11-86-90-4E-E3-4A-CC-C9-B6-68-C6&pdfprint=true&guestview=true 6/14 12/2/2020 AGU - iPosterSessions.com MEASUREMENTS AT MARS The second location where we evaluate an impact of the 20 August 2018 CME is Mars. Mars does not have spacecraft that monitor the upstream solar wind continuously; nevertheless, we use data from MAVEN and Mars Express, which orbit Mars and spend part of their orbits in the solar wind. We complement these measurements with data taken by the Curiosity rover on the Martian surface. In-situ magnetic field, plasma, and particle measurements at Mars are shown in Figure 4. https://agu2020fallmeeting-agu.ipostersessions.com/Default.aspx?s=2E-1B-8E-DA-65-11-86-90-4E-E3-4A-CC-C9-B6-68-C6&pdfprint=true&guestview=true 7/14 12/2/2020 AGU - iPosterSessions.com Figure 4. In-situ measurements at Mars. The grey vertical line indicates the estimated arrival of an interplanetary shock. Data are taken from the MAVEN and MEX spacecraft orbiting Mars and the MSL/Curiosity rover on ground. Measurements at Mars reveal the clear passage of an interplanetary disturbance between 27–28 August 2018, marked by enhanced magnetic fields (panel a) and solar wind densities (panel f) but relatively slow solar wind (panel e), ahead of a following HSS. However, it is unclear whether this disturbance contains material from the 20 August CME or if the whole structure corresponds to a SIR. After the passage of a likely interplanetary shock in the early hours of 27 August, the density profile looks strikingly similar to that inside the magnetic cloud at Earth, but other ICME ejecta signatures are missing; e.g., bidirectional electrons are lacking and the plasma beta is not lower than in the ambient solar wind. The disturbance is also associated with a weak Forbush decrease (panels l–m, ~2% variation both in space and on ground, like at Earth), but such decrease could be equally driven by a CME or a SIR (see, e.g., Guo et al. 2018). Hence, it is difficult to conclude whether the 20 August CME merged with the SIR before reaching 1.4 AU, or whether it missed Mars completely (either because of its limited longitudinal extent or because it was deflected towards the west between the orbits of Earth and Mars). https://agu2020fallmeeting-agu.ipostersessions.com/Default.aspx?s=2E-1B-8E-DA-65-11-86-90-4E-E3-4A-CC-C9-B6-68-C6&pdfprint=true&guestview=true 8/14 12/2/2020 AGU - iPosterSessions.com HELIOSPHERIC CONTEXT In order to analyse in-situ measurements at Earth and Mars within the larger heliospheric context, we run a 3D MHD simulation using the WSA–Enlil+Cone model (Odstrcil 2003; Arge et al. 2004). The CME parameters that we use as input for the model are entirely derived from GCS reconstructions (see Figure 2) and propagated to 21.5 R⨀ (i.e.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Principles of Great Geomagnetic Storms Forcasting by Online Cosmic Ray Data L
    Space weather and dangerous phenomena on the Earth: principles of great geomagnetic storms forcasting by online cosmic ray data L. I. Dorman To cite this version: L. I. Dorman. Space weather and dangerous phenomena on the Earth: principles of great geomagnetic storms forcasting by online cosmic ray data. Annales Geophysicae, European Geosciences Union, 2005, 23 (9), pp.2997-3002. hal-00317980 HAL Id: hal-00317980 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00317980 Submitted on 22 Nov 2005 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Annales Geophysicae, 23, 2997–3002, 2005 SRef-ID: 1432-0576/ag/2005-23-2997 Annales © European Geosciences Union 2005 Geophysicae Space weather and dangerous phenomena on the Earth: principles of great geomagnetic storms forcasting by online cosmic ray data L. I. Dorman1,2 1Israel Cosmic Ray and Space Weather Center and Emilio Segre’ Observatory, affiliated to Tel Aviv University, Technion and Israel Space Agency, P. O. Box 2217, Qazrin 12900, Israel 2Cosmic Ray Department of IZMIRAN, Russian Academy of Science, Troitsk 142092, Moscow Region, Russia Received: 25 February 2005 – Revised: 24 May 2005 – Accepted: 28 May 2005 – Published: 22 November 2005 Part of Special Issue “1st European Space Weather Week (ESWW)” Abstract.
    [Show full text]
  • Forbush Decreases and Turbulence Levels at Coronal Mass Ejection Fronts
    A&A 494, 1107–1118 (2009) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:200809551 & c ESO 2009 Astrophysics Forbush decreases and turbulence levels at coronal mass ejection fronts P. Subramanian1,H.M.Antia2,S.R.Dugad2,U.D.Goswami2,S.K.Gupta2, Y. Hayashi3, N. Ito3,S.Kawakami3, H. Kojima4,P.K.Mohanty2,P.K.Nayak2, T. Nonaka3,A.Oshima3, K. Sivaprasad2,H.Tanaka2, and S. C. Tonwar2 (The GRAPES-3 collaboration) 1 Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Sai Trinity Building, Pashan, Pune 411021, India 2 Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Homi Bhabha Road, Mumbai 400005, India e-mail: [email protected] 3 Graduate School of Science, Osaka City University, Osaka 558-8585, Japan 4 Nagoya Women’s University, Nagoya 467-8610, Japan Received 11 February 2008 / Accepted 25 October 2008 ABSTRACT Aims. We seek to estimate the average level of MHD turbulence near coronal mass ejection (CME) fronts as they propagate from the SuntotheEarth. Methods. We examined the cosmic ray data from the GRAPES-3 tracking muon telescope at Ooty, together with the data from other sources for three closely observed Forbush decrease events. Each of these event is associated with frontside halo coronal mass ejections (CMEs) and near-Earth magnetic clouds. The associated Forbush decreases are therefore expected to have significant contributions from the cosmic-ray depressions inside the CMEs/ejecta. In each case, we estimate the magnitude of the Forbush decrease using a simple model for the diffusion of high-energy protons through the largely closed field lines enclosing the CME as it expands and propagates from the Sun to the Earth.
    [Show full text]
  • Does Local Structure Within Shock-Sheath and Magnetic
    Prepared for submission to arXiv Does Local Structure Within Shock-sheath and Magnetic Cloud Affect Cosmic Ray Decrease? Anil Raghav,a,1 Zubair Shaikh,a Ankush Bhaskar,b,1 Gauri Datar,a Geeta Vichareb aUniversity Department of Physics, University of Mumbai, Vidyanagari, Santacruz (E), Mumbai-400098, India bIndian Institute of Geomagnetism, New Panvel, Navi Mumbai- 410218, India. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected], Abstract. The sudden short duration decrease in cosmic ray flux is known as Forbush decrease which is mainly caused by interplanetary disturbances. A generally accepted view is that the first step of Forbush decrease is due to shock sheath and second step is due to magnetic cloud (MC) of interplanetary coronal mass ejection (ICME). This simplistic picture does not consider several physical aspects, such as, whether the complete shock-sheath or MC (or only part of these) are contributing to the decrease, what effect does the internal structure within the shock-sheath region / MC have on the decrease, etc. We present a summary of the analysis of a total of 18 large (≥ 8%) Forbush decrease events and the associated ICMEs, a majority of which show multiple steps in the Forbush decrease profile. We propose a re-classification of Forbush decrease events depending upon the number of steps observed in their respective profile, and the physical origin of these steps. Our analysis clearly indicates that not only broad regions (shock-sheath and MC), but also localized structures within the shock-sheath and MC, have a very significant role in influencing the Forbush decrease profile. The arXiv:1608.03772v2 [astro-ph.HE] 24 Aug 2016 detailed analysis in the present work is expected to contribute toward understanding the relationship between FD and ICME parameters in better way.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1712.07301V1 [Physics.Space-Ph] 19 Dec 2017
    Confidential manuscript submitted to JGR-Space Physics Using Forbush decreases to derive the transit time of ICMEs propagating from 1 AU to Mars Johan L. Freiherr von Forstner1, Jingnan Guo1, Robert F. Wimmer-Schweingruber1, Donald M. Hassler2;3, Manuela Temmer4, Mateja Dumbović4, Lan K. Jian5;6, Jan K. Appel1, Jaša Čalogović7, Bent Ehresmann2, Bernd Heber1, Henning Lohf1, Arik Posner8, Christian T. Steigies1, Bojan Vršnak7, and Cary J. Zeitlin9 1Institute of Experimental and Applied Physics, University of Kiel, Germany 2Southwest Research Institute, Boulder, Colorado, USA 3Institut d’Astrophysique Spatiale, University Paris Sud, Orsay, France 4Institute of Physics, University of Graz, Austria 5University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA 6NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA 7Hvar Observatory, Faculty of Geodesy, University of Zagreb, Croatia 8NASA Headquarters, Washington, DC, USA 9Leidos, Houston, Texas, USA Key Points: • The interplanetary propagation of 15 CMEs is studied based on a cross-correlation analysis of Forbush decreases at 1 AU and Mars. • The speed evolutions of the ICMEs are derived from observations, indicating that most of them are slightly decelerated even beyond 1 AU. • Model-predicted ICME arrival times at Mars could be improved by using ICME pa- rameters measured at 1 AU. arXiv:1712.07301v1 [physics.space-ph] 19 Dec 2017 Corresponding author: J. Guo, [email protected] –1– Confidential manuscript submitted to JGR-Space Physics Abstract The propagation of 15 interplanetary coronal mass ejections (ICMEs) from Earth’s orbit (1 AU) to Mars ( 1.5 AU) has been studied with their propagation speed estimated from ∼ both measurements and simulations. The enhancement of magnetic fields related to ICMEs and their shock fronts cause the so-called Forbush decrease, which can be detected as a re- duction of galactic cosmic rays measured on-ground.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Forbush Decreases Observed Using a Muon Telescope in Antarctica Starting on 21 June 2015 *
    Chinese Physics C Vol. 42, No. 12 (2018) 125001 Analysis of Forbush decreases observed using a muon telescope in Antarctica starting on 21 June 2015 * De-Hong Huang(黄德宏)1;1) Hong-Qiao Hu(胡红桥)1 Ji-Long Zhang(张吉龙)2;2) Hong Lu(卢红)2 Da-Li Zhang(张大力)2 Bin-Shen Xue(薛炳森)3 Jing-Tian Lu(吕景天)3 1 SOA Key Laboratory for Polar Science, Polar Research Institute of China, Shanghai 200136, China 2 Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Beijing 100049, China 3 Key Laboratory of Space Weather, National Center for Space Weather, China Meteorological Administration, Beijing 10081, China Abstract: A cosmic-ray muon telescope has been collecting data since the end of 2014, which was shortly after the telescope was built in the Zhongshan Station of Antarctica. The telescope is the first observation device to be built by Chinese scientists in Antarctica. The pressure change is very strong in Zhongshan station. The count rate of the pressure correction results shows that the large variations in the count rate are likely caused by pressure fluctuations. During the period from 18 June to 22 June 2015, four halo coronal mass ejections (CMEs) were ejected from the Sun. These CMEs initiated a series of Forbush decreases (FD) when they reached the Earth. We conducted a comprehensive study of the intensity fluctuations of galactic cosmic rays recorded during FDs. The intensity fluctuations used in this study were collected by cosmic ray detectors of multiple stations (Zhongshan, McMurdo, South Polar, and Nagoya), and the solar wind measurements were collected by ACE and WIND.
    [Show full text]
  • Pos(ICRC2019)045 FORBUSH DECREASE FORBUSH Cosmic Ray Intensity, Forbush Decrease, Coronal Mass 2 1
    INTERPLANETARY MAGNETIC FIELD PARAMETERS AFFECTING COSMIC RAY FORBUSH DECREASE M. L. Chauhan1 Department of Physics, Govt. Model Science College PoS(ICRC2019)045 Jabalpur, M.P., INDIA E-mail: [email protected] M.K.Richharia2 Department of Physics, Govt. Model Science College Jabalpur, M.P., INDIA B.K.Soni3 Government Girls College, Bilaspur (C.G.), INDIA. Abstract Coronal mass ejections (CMEs) hurl huge volumes of magnetized plasma into interplanetary space often referred to as ICMEs or ejecta. They are an important component of solar wind and can cause enhanced geomagnetic activity when they interact with the Earth’s magnetosphere. When the ejecta have an average speed greater than the upstream solar wind speed they create a shock. The large IMF variations due to interplanetary shocks cause depression in the cosmic ray intensity (CRI) called Forbush Decrease (FD). Large Fds caused by fast CMEs are specifically associated with energetic X-ray flares. In the present paper, the author has studied seven largest Forbush decrease events selected from Moscow Neutron Monitor Station during a period of twelve years (1996- 2008), i.e., 23rd solar cycle. The analysis of CRI data with interplanetary magnetic field |B|, its southward component Bz, solar wind velocity, Kp and Dst indices shows that all the three phenomena- solar, interplanetary and geomagnetic are connected to FD. The relationship between interplanetary parameters and FDs is discussed in detail. Moreover the solar cycle effect is found to be slightly shifted for large FDs as the frequency of occurrence of major FD events is more in the descending phase of the solar cycle.
    [Show full text]
  • Space Radiation and Impact on Instrumentation Technologies
    NASA/TP—2020-220002 Space Radiation and Impact on Instrumentation Technologies John D. Wrbanek and Susan Y. Wrbanek Glenn Research Center, Cleveland, Ohio January 2020 NASA STI Program . in Profile Since its founding, NASA has been dedicated • CONTRACTOR REPORT. Scientific and to the advancement of aeronautics and space science. technical findings by NASA-sponsored The NASA Scientific and Technical Information (STI) contractors and grantees. Program plays a key part in helping NASA maintain this important role. • CONFERENCE PUBLICATION. Collected papers from scientific and technical conferences, symposia, seminars, or other The NASA STI Program operates under the auspices meetings sponsored or co-sponsored by NASA. of the Agency Chief Information Officer. It collects, organizes, provides for archiving, and disseminates • SPECIAL PUBLICATION. Scientific, NASA’s STI. The NASA STI Program provides access technical, or historical information from to the NASA Technical Report Server—Registered NASA programs, projects, and missions, often (NTRS Reg) and NASA Technical Report Server— concerned with subjects having substantial Public (NTRS) thus providing one of the largest public interest. collections of aeronautical and space science STI in the world. Results are published in both non-NASA • TECHNICAL TRANSLATION. English- channels and by NASA in the NASA STI Report language translations of foreign scientific and Series, which includes the following report types: technical material pertinent to NASA’s mission. • TECHNICAL PUBLICATION. Reports of For more information about the NASA STI completed research or a major significant phase program, see the following: of research that present the results of NASA programs and include extensive data or theoretical • Access the NASA STI program home page at analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analytical Diffusion-Expansion Model for Forbush Decreases Caused by Flux Ropes
    Draft version May 3, 2018 Typeset using LATEX default style in AASTeX61 AN ANALYTICAL DIFFUSION-EXPANSION MODEL FOR FORBUSH DECREASES CAUSED BY FLUX ROPES Mateja Dumbovic´,1 Bernd Heber,2 Bojan Vrˇsnak,3 Manuela Temmer,1 and Anamarija Kirin4 1Institute of Physics, University of Graz, Universit¨atsplatz5, A-8010 Graz, Austria 2Department of Extraterrestrial Physics, Christian-Albrechts University in Kiel, Liebnitzstrasse 11, 24098, Kiel, Germany 3Hvar Observatory, Faculty of Geodesy, University of Zagreb, Kaˇci´ceva26, HR-10000, Zagreb, Croatia 4Karlovac University of Applied Sciences, Karlovac, Croatia Submitted to ApJ ABSTRACT We present an analytical diffusion–expansion Forbush decrease (FD) model ForbMod which is based on the widely used approach of the initially empty, closed magnetic structure (i.e. flux rope) which fills up slowly with particles by perpendicular diffusion. The model is restricted to explain only the depression caused by the magnetic structure of the interplanetary coronal mass ejection (ICME). We use remote CME observations and a 3D reconstruction method (the Graduated Cylindrical Shell method) to constrain initial boundary conditions of the FD model and take into account CME evolutionary properties by incorporating flux rope expansion. Several flux rope expansion modes are considered, which can lead to different FD characteristics. In general, the model is qualitatively in agreement with observations, whereas quantitative agreement depends on the diffusion coefficient and the expansion properties (interplay of the diffusion and the expansion). A case study was performed to explain the FD observed 2014 May 30. The observed FD was fitted quite well by ForbMod for all expansion modes using only the diffusion coefficient as a free parameter, where the diffusion parameter was found to correspond to expected range of values.
    [Show full text]
  • Nadio EMISSIONS Vnom Ttte Oisten Heliosehene
    / / , :_ J- /O,_ NASA-OR-204670 l/t - (" __. Z:. lilt &-' ;? nADIO EMISSIONS VnOM TttE OISTEn HELIOSeHEnE D. A. GURNETI" and W. S. KURTH Dept. of Physics and Astronom); The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA Abstract. For nearly fifteen years the Voyager 1 and 2 spacecraft have been detecting an unusual ' radio emission in the outer heliosphere in the frequency range from about 2 to 3 kHz. Two major events have been observed, the first in 1983-84 and the second in 1992-93. In both cases the onset of the radio emission occurred about 400 days after a period of intense solar activity, the first in mid-July 1982, and the second in May-June 1991. These two periods of solar activity produced the two deepest cosmic ray Forbush decreases ever observed. Forbush decreases are indicative of a system of strong shocks and associated disturbances propagating outward through the heliosphere. The radio emission is believed to have been produced when this system of shocks and disturbances interacted with one of the outer boundaries of the heliosphere, most likely in the vicinity of the the heliopause. The emission is believed to be generated by the shock-driven Langmuir-wave mode conversion mechanism, which produces radiation at the plasma frequency (fp) and at twice the plasma frequency (2fp). From the 400-day travel time and the known speed of the shocks, the distance to the interaction region can be computed, and is estimated to be in the range from about 110 to 160 AU. Key words: Heliospheric Radio Emissions, Heliosphere, Heliopause, Termination Shock Abbreviations: PWS-Plasma Wave Subsystem, AU-Astronomical Unit, DSN-Deep Space Net- work, NASA-National Aeronautics and Space Administration, GMIR_Global Merged Interaction Region, MHD-Magnetohydrodynamic, CME-coronal mass ejection, fp-plasma frequency, R-radial distance, AGC-automatic gain control I.
    [Show full text]
  • Measurements of Forbush Decreases at Mars: Comparison of Measurement by MAVEN in Orbit and by MSL on Ground
    Measurements of Forbush decreases at Mars: comparison of measurement by MAVEN in orbit and by MSL on ground Jingnan Guo1, Robert Lillis2, Robert F. Wimmer-Sch eingruber!, "ary #eitlin$, %atric& Simonson!,', (li Rahmati2, (rik %osner), (thanasios %apaioannou*, +iklas Lundt!, "hristina ,. Lee2, -a.in Larson2, /asper 0alekas1, -onald M. 0assler2, 3ent 4hresmann2, %atric& -unn2, and Stephan 35ttcher! 6!) 8ni.ersity of 9iel, Kiel, :ermany (2) SSL, 8ni.ersity of "alifornia, 3er&eley "(, 8S( 6$) Leidos, +(SA /ohnson Space center, ;X, 8SA 6'7 "ollege of "harleston, South "arolina, 8SA 6)) +(SA 0ead=uarter, Washington -", 8SA 6*7+ational ,bser.atory of (thens, :reece 61) South est Research >nstitute, 3oulder, ",, 8S( 62) 8ni.ersity of >o a, >o a "ity, >o a, 8SA November 2017, ESWW, Ostend, elgium ref# Guo et a! 2017 A$A %submitted& 1 GCR and Forbush decreases measured at Mars ● ,n the surface of Mars, the Radiation (ssessment -etector 6'A(7, on board Mars Science Laboratory?s 6MSL7 "uriosity ro.er, has been measuring ground le.el particle flu@es along ith the radiation dose rate at Mars surface since August 2012. ● Similar to neutron monitors at 4arth, R(- sees many )orbus* de+reases %)(s& in the galactic cosmic ray 6:CR7 induced surface flu@es and dose rates. ;hese F-s are associated ith coronal mass eAections 6"M4s7 andBor streamBcorotating interaction regions 6SIRsBCIRs7. ● Orbiting abo.e the Martian atmosphere, the Mars (tmosphere and Colatile 4.olutio+ 6MAVEN7 spacecraft has also been monitoring space eather conditions at Mars since September 2D!'. ;he penetrating particle flu@ channels in the Solar 4nergetic %article 6SE,7 instrument onboard M(C4+ can also be employed to detect F-s.
    [Show full text]
  • Cosmic-Ray Database Update: Ultra-High Energy, Ultra-Heavy, and Antinuclei Cosmic-Ray Data (CRDB V4.0)
    universe Article Cosmic-Ray Database Update: Ultra-High Energy, Ultra-Heavy, and Antinuclei Cosmic-Ray Data (CRDB v4.0) David Maurin 1,* , Hans Peter Dembinski 2,* , Javier Gonzalez 3, Ioana Codrina Mari¸s 4 and Frédéric Melot 1 1 LPSC, Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS/IN2P3, 53 avenue des Martyrs, 38026 Grenoble, France; [email protected] 2 Dortmund Technical University, Experimental Physics 5, Otto-Hahn-Strasse 4a, 44227 Dortmund, Germany 3 Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA; [email protected] 4 Université Libre de Bruxelles, Faculté des Sciences, Département de Physique, Campus La Plaine, Boulevard du Triomphe, 2 CP 230, 1050 Bruxelles, Belgium; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] (D.M.); [email protected] (H.P.D.) Received: 2 June 2020; Accepted: 15 July 2020; Published: 24 July 2020 Abstract: We present an update on CRDB, the cosmic-ray database for charged species. CRDB is based on MySQL, queried and sorted by jquery and table-sorter libraries, and displayed via PHP web pages through the AJAX protocol. We review the modifications made on the structure and outputs of the database since the first release (Maurin et al., 2014). For this update, the most important feature is the inclusion of ultra-heavy nuclei (Z > 30), ultra-high energy nuclei (from 1015 to 1020 eV), and limits on antinuclei fluxes (Z ≤ −1 for A > 1); more than 100 experiments, 350 publications, and 40,000 data points are now available in CRDB. We also revisited and simplified how users can retrieve data and submit new ones.
    [Show full text]
  • Nasa Cr-61316 Long Range Solar Flare -Prediction
    NASA C.0NTR ACTOR REPORT NASA CR-61316 LONG RANGE SOLAR FLARE -PREDICTION By Dr. J. B. Blizard Departnmnt of Physics Denver Research Inetitute University of Denver Denver, Colorado 80210 October 1969 Final Report Pmpamd for NASA-GEORGE C. MARSHALL SPACE FLIGHT CENTER Marehall Space Flight Center, Alabama 35812 -- --- -.--- .- _. __ -_- ____-__. 4 1lltF RNI' ClWlltlF ti mFP'IPIr IlCIF Ot, I , 100') I A )NU HAN(1lt NOI AN It I AH II l'ltlll) 1C'l' 1ON I___- - - _- - ._ 6 PIFHkUHMINb OHGAIdI/AI ION 1HJk 7. AUTHOR(S) e. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPOR r II J. B. Blizard 4130-10 9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS 10. WORK UNIT NO. Department of Phys ics Denver Research Institute 11. CONTRACf OR GRANT NO. University of Denver NAS8-21436 Denver, Colorado 80210 13. TYPE OF R~POR~PERIOD COVERED 12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS Contractor Aero-Astrodynamics Laboratory 6- 681 8- 69 NASA - George C. Marshall Space Flight Center , Marshall Space Flight Center, Alabama 35812 14. SPdNSORlNG AGENCY CODE (The publication of this report does, not constitute agreement with its conclusions by NASA. It is published only for the exchange and simulation of ideas.) 19. SECURITY CLASSlF. (dthio repart1 20. SECURITY CLASSIF. (of thlm pae) 21. NO. OF PAGES 22. PRICE UNCLASSIFIED UNCUS SIFIED 75 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 'Page 1 INTRODUCTION . 1 2 ORGANIZATION OF REPORT 4 3 EMPIRICAL APPROACH (Planet Conj) . 5 Empirical Flare Prediction . 6 Theoretical Flare Prediction 7 Rank Order of Planetary Effects 8 4 MAJOR EVENTS BEFORE 1942 . 16 Long Lived Giant Sunspots .
    [Show full text]