DOCSLIB.ORG

Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration DRAFT INITIAL STUDY/ MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION for the FORT ORD VILLAGE LIFT STATION & FORCE MAIN REPLACEMENT PROJECT Prepared for: Prepared by: Marina Coast Water District Denise Duffy & Associates 11 Reservation Road 947 Cass Street, Suite 5 Marina, CA 93933-2099 Monterey, CA 93940 September 2019 This Page Intentionally Left Blank Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ....................................................................................................................................... i Figures ....................................................................................................................................................... ii Tables ........................................................................................................................................................ ii Appendices ................................................................................................................................................ ii 1. Background Information ................................................................................................................... 1 2. Project Summary ............................................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Project Background ................................................................................................................... 3 2.3 Project Location ........................................................................................................................ 4 2.4 Project Description .................................................................................................................... 9 2.5 Project Goals and Objectives .................................................................................................. 12 2.6 Project Approvals and Permits ................................................................................................ 12 3. Environmental Factors potentially Affected ................................................................................... 13 4. Determination ................................................................................................................................. 15 5. Environmental Evaluation ............................................................................................................... 17 5.1 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts ..................................................................................... 17 5.2 Environmental Setting and Impacts ........................................................................................ 18 5.2.1 Aesthetics ........................................................................................................................ 18 5.2.2 Agricultural and Forestry Resources ............................................................................... 19 5.2.3 Air Quality ...................................................................................................................... 21 5.2.4 Biological Resources ....................................................................................................... 25 5.2.5 Cultural Resources .......................................................................................................... 43 5.2.6 Energy ............................................................................................................................. 46 5.2.7 Geology and Soils ........................................................................................................... 47 5.2.8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions ............................................................................................. 51 5.2.9 Hazards and Hazardous Materials ................................................................................... 53 5.2.10 Hydrology and Water Quality ......................................................................................... 58 5.2.11 Land Use ......................................................................................................................... 61 5.2.12 Mineral Resources ........................................................................................................... 62 5.2.13 Noise ............................................................................................................................... 63 5.2.14 Population and Housing .................................................................................................. 66 5.2.15 Public Services ................................................................................................................ 67 5.2.16 Recreation ....................................................................................................................... 69 5.2.17 Transportation ................................................................................................................. 69 5.2.18 Tribal Cultural Resources ............................................................................................... 71 5.2.19 Utilities and Service Systems .......................................................................................... 72 Fort Ord Village Lift Station & i Draft IS/MND Force Main Replacement Project September 2019 Table of Contents 5.2.20 Wildfire ........................................................................................................................... 74 5.2.21 Mandatory Findings of Significance ............................................................................... 75 6. Document Preparation & References .............................................................................................. 77 FIGURES Figure 1. Regional Map ............................................................................................................................... 5 Figure 2. Project Location ............................................................................................................................ 6 Figure 3. Site Photos .................................................................................................................................... 7 Figure 4. Project Overview .......................................................................................................................... 8 Figure 5. Site Plan ...................................................................................................................................... 10 Figure 6. Vegetation Types Map ................................................................................................................ 27 Figure 7. Special-Status Plant Species Map ............................................................................................... 28 Figure 8. Smith’s Blue Butterfly Habitat Map ........................................................................................... 29 Figure 9. Sensitive Habitats Map ............................................................................................................... 30 TABLES Table 1. North Central Coast Air Basin Attainment Status Summary as of January 2015 ........................ 31 Table 2. Estimated Annual Energy Use of Proposed Project ..................................................................... 47 Table 3. Vibration Velocities for Construction Equipment ....................................................................... 66 APPENDICES A. Fort Ord Village Lift Station & Force Main Replacement Project Biological Resources Report Fort Ord Village Lift Station & ii Draft IS/MND Force Main Replacement Project September 2019 1. Background Information 1. BACKGROUND INFORMATION 1. Project Title: Fort Ord Village Lift Station and Force Main Replacement Project 2. Lead Agency/Project Proponent Name and Address: Marina Coast Water District (MCWD), 11 Reservation Road, Marina, CA 93933 3. Contact Person & Phone Number: Michael Wegley, MCWD District Engineer, (831) 883-5925 4 Project Location: The project is located in California within the City of Seaside, in Monterey County; unincorporated Monterey County; and Fort Ord Dunes State Park (FODSP). Specifically, the existing Fort Ord Village Lift Station is located on the west side of Highway 1, within the FODSP, in unincorporated Monterey County, on assessor parcel number (APN) 031-051-001-000. The proposed replacement lift station would be located along Monterey Road, east of Highway 1, on the edge of a City of Seaside percolation pond, next to the existing gravity sewer pipeline within APN 031-051-023-000. The existing force main would be accessed via an unpaved road along the pipeline easement, starting at the west end of Gigling Road within APNs 031-141-004-000 and 031-141-002-000. Staging areas for construction would be contained within APN 031-141-004- 000. The new sanitary sewer force main (SSFM) is proposed to go under existing roadways from the new pump station to the MCWD’s Sanitary Sewer Manhole (SSMH) C6. Specifically, the new SSFM would follow Monterey Road, then turn into the U.S. Army housing area at Bougainville Road, turn onto Buna Road, then Kiska Road, and finally turn onto Okinawa Road, where it would reconnect to the MCWD’s SSFM. 5. Project Summary: The existing Fort Ord Village Lift Station and Force Main have exceeded their service life and require replacement. The existing
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Population Genetics and Genetic Structure in San Joaquin Woolly
    POPULATION GENETICS AND GENETIC STRUCTURE IN SAN JOAQUIN WOOLY THREADS (Monolopia congdonii (A. Gray) B.G. Baldwin Bureau of Land Management – UC Berkeley Grant/Cooperative Agreement Number: L12AC20073 Susan Bainbridge Jepson Herbarium 1001 VLSB #2465 University of California Berkeley, CA 94720 Ryan O’Dell Bureau of Land Management California & Bruce Baldwin UC Berkeley INTRODUCTION Conservation of genetic variability is one of the most important and concrete measures ecologists and land managers can implement to maintain viability for specific organisms vulnerable to climate change and to increase success of restoration. Genetic diversity via adaptation and gene flow can help organisms increase chances of surviving environmental changes (Anderson et al. 2012, Reusch et al. 2005, Jump et al. 2008, Doi et al. 2010). Genetic diversity is also threatened by climate change by erosion due to range shifts and/or reductions (Aguilar et al. 2008, Alsos et al. 2012). Genetic diversity is also an important criterion for restoration and conservation planning, and prioritizing protection of populations. For plant taxa with a declining or limited geographical range or declining populations, perspective on regional and local genetic structure and history is important for developing effective management and restoration planning. Genetic diversity and the processes that shape or maintain that diversity are considered integral for population viability. Inherently rare taxa or those that have had a reduction in population size or an increase in fragmentation may have low levels of genetic variability, in addition to other factors. This increases their vulnerability to inbreeding depression and changes in environmental conditions. At the same time, these taxa are also more vulnerable to unintended consequences of restoration or attempts at enhancement, such as insufficient genetic sampling; swamping of rare genotypes or alleles; or hampered local adaptation by introduction of non-local material.
    [Show full text]
  • Low-Effect Habitat Conservation Plan for the Mount Hermon June Beetle
    Low-Effect Habitat Conservation Plan for the Mount Hermon June Beetle, the Ben Lomond Wallflower, and the Ben Lomond Spineflower, at Bean Creek Estates, a 13-unit residential development site (APN 022-631-22), Located on Bean Creek Road in Scotts Valley, Santa Cruz County, California Prepared for: Mr. Tom Masters 28225 Robinson Canyon Road Carmel, CA 93923 (831) 625-0413 Prepared by: Richard A. Arnold, Ph.D. Entomological Consulting Services, Ltd. 104 Mountain View Court Pleasant Hill, CA 94523-2188 (925) 825-3784 and Kathy Lyons Biotic Resources Group 2551 So. Rodeo Gulch Road, Suite 12 Soquel, CA 95073-2057 (831) 476-4803 and Todd Graff and Norman Schwartz Bolton Hill Company, Inc. 303 Potrero Street, Suite 42-204 Santa Cruz, CA 95060 (831) 457-8696 Revised Draft March 2007 [Type text] EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Mr. Tom Masters (“Applicant”) has applied for a permit pursuant to section 10 (a)(1)(B) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531-1544, 87 Stat. 884) (ESA), as amended, from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (the Service) for the incidental take of the endangered Mount Hermon June beetle (Polyphylla barbata). In addition, Mr. Masters is requesting that the Service include the Ben Lomond Wallflower (Erysimum teretifolium), and the Ben Lomond Spineflower (Chorizanthe pungens var. hartwegiana) on the incidental take permit, but that the permit is not being sought for incidental take of these two plant taxa. The potential taking would occur incidental to development of 13 single-family residences at an undeveloped, 18.07-acre parcel (APN 022-631-22) owned by the Applicant and located on Bean Creek Road in Scotts Valley (Santa Cruz, County), CA.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenies and Secondary Chemistry in Arnica (Asteraceae)
    Digital Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Science and Technology 392 Phylogenies and Secondary Chemistry in Arnica (Asteraceae) CATARINA EKENÄS ACTA UNIVERSITATIS UPSALIENSIS ISSN 1651-6214 UPPSALA ISBN 978-91-554-7092-0 2008 urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-8459 !"# $ % !& '((" !()(( * * * + , - . , / , '((", + 0 1# 2, # , 34', 56 , , 70 46"84!855&86(4'8(, - 1# 2 . * 9 10-2 . * . # 9 , * * 1 ! " #! !$ 2 1 2 .8 # * * :# 77 1%&'(2 . !6 '3, + . .8 ) / , ; < * . * ** # , * * * , 09 * . # * * 33 * != , 0- # 9 * * 1, , * 2 . * , 0 * * * * * . * , $ * 0- * % # , # 8 * * * * * * $8> # . * * !' , * * . ** , ? . 0- , +,- # # 7-0 -0 :+' 9 +# $8> ./0) . ) 1 ) 2 * 3) ) .456(7 ) , @ / '((" 700 !=5!8='!& 70 46"84!855&86(4'8( ) ))) 8"&54 1 );; ,/,; A B ) ))) 8"&542 List of Papers This thesis is based on the following papers, which are referred to in the text by their Roman numerals: I Ekenäs, C., B. G. Baldwin, and K. Andreasen. 2007. A molecular phylogenetic
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Environment Study Addendum
    Natural Environment Study Addendum State Route 1 HOV Lanes Tier I Corridor Analysis of High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) Lanes and Transportation System Management (TSM) Alternatives (05 SCR-1-PM 7.24-16.13) and Tier II Build Project Analysis 41st Avenue to Soquel Avenue/Drive Auxiliary Lanes and Chanticleer Avenue Pedestrian-Bicycle Overcrossing (05 SCR-1-PM 13.5-14.9) EA 0C7300 April 2018 For individuals with sensory disabilities, this document is available in Braille, large print, on audiocassette, or computer disk. To obtain a copy in one of these alternate formats, please call or write to Caltrans, Attn: Matt Fowler, California Department of Transportation – District 5, 50 Higuera Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401; 805-542-4603 Voice, or use the California Relay Service 1 (800) 735-2929 (TTY), 1 (800) 735-2929 (Voice), or 711. This page intentionally left blank. State Route 1 HOV Lanes Project Natural Environmental Study Addendum CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 NATURAL ENVIRONMENT STUDY ADDENDUM METHODS .......................................... 1 2 RESOURCES AND IMPACTS EVALUATION............................................................................... 1 2.1 SPECIAL-STATUS PLANT SPECIES ....................................................................................... 1 2.2 SPECIAL STATUS ANIMAL SPECIES .................................................................................... 3 2.2.1 California
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Plants of Santa Cruz County, California
    ANNOTATED CHECKLIST of the VASCULAR PLANTS of SANTA CRUZ COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SECOND EDITION Dylan Neubauer Artwork by Tim Hyland & Maps by Ben Pease CALIFORNIA NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY, SANTA CRUZ COUNTY CHAPTER Copyright © 2013 by Dylan Neubauer All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced without written permission from the author. Design & Production by Dylan Neubauer Artwork by Tim Hyland Maps by Ben Pease, Pease Press Cartography (peasepress.com) Cover photos (Eschscholzia californica & Big Willow Gulch, Swanton) by Dylan Neubauer California Native Plant Society Santa Cruz County Chapter P.O. Box 1622 Santa Cruz, CA 95061 To order, please go to www.cruzcps.org For other correspondence, write to Dylan Neubauer [email protected] ISBN: 978-0-615-85493-9 Printed on recycled paper by Community Printers, Santa Cruz, CA For Tim Forsell, who appreciates the tiny ones ... Nobody sees a flower, really— it is so small— we haven’t time, and to see takes time, like to have a friend takes time. —GEORGIA O’KEEFFE CONTENTS ~ u Acknowledgments / 1 u Santa Cruz County Map / 2–3 u Introduction / 4 u Checklist Conventions / 8 u Floristic Regions Map / 12 u Checklist Format, Checklist Symbols, & Region Codes / 13 u Checklist Lycophytes / 14 Ferns / 14 Gymnosperms / 15 Nymphaeales / 16 Magnoliids / 16 Ceratophyllales / 16 Eudicots / 16 Monocots / 61 u Appendices 1. Listed Taxa / 76 2. Endemic Taxa / 78 3. Taxa Extirpated in County / 79 4. Taxa Not Currently Recognized / 80 5. Undescribed Taxa / 82 6. Most Invasive Non-native Taxa / 83 7. Rejected Taxa / 84 8. Notes / 86 u References / 152 u Index to Families & Genera / 154 u Floristic Regions Map with USGS Quad Overlay / 166 “True science teaches, above all, to doubt and be ignorant.” —MIGUEL DE UNAMUNO 1 ~ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ~ ANY THANKS TO THE GENEROUS DONORS without whom this publication would not M have been possible—and to the numerous individuals, organizations, insti- tutions, and agencies that so willingly gave of their time and expertise.
    [Show full text]
  • A Checklist of Vascular Plants Endemic to California
    Humboldt State University Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University Botanical Studies Open Educational Resources and Data 3-2020 A Checklist of Vascular Plants Endemic to California James P. Smith Jr Humboldt State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Smith, James P. Jr, "A Checklist of Vascular Plants Endemic to California" (2020). Botanical Studies. 42. https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps/42 This Flora of California is brought to you for free and open access by the Open Educational Resources and Data at Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Botanical Studies by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A LIST OF THE VASCULAR PLANTS ENDEMIC TO CALIFORNIA Compiled By James P. Smith, Jr. Professor Emeritus of Botany Department of Biological Sciences Humboldt State University Arcata, California 13 February 2020 CONTENTS Willis Jepson (1923-1925) recognized that the assemblage of plants that characterized our flora excludes the desert province of southwest California Introduction. 1 and extends beyond its political boundaries to include An Overview. 2 southwestern Oregon, a small portion of western Endemic Genera . 2 Nevada, and the northern portion of Baja California, Almost Endemic Genera . 3 Mexico. This expanded region became known as the California Floristic Province (CFP). Keep in mind that List of Endemic Plants . 4 not all plants endemic to California lie within the CFP Plants Endemic to a Single County or Island 24 and others that are endemic to the CFP are not County and Channel Island Abbreviations .
    [Show full text]
  • 1'115 Herbert J
    --;~, .~ .. .~ .. A List of the VASCULAR PLANTS of JASPER RIDGE BIOLOGICAL PRESERVE 1'115 HERBERT J. DENGLER 219 WYNDHAM ORIVE POFffOl.A VAL.L.e;Y. CALJF. $11402D - 1 - DIVISION C ti.LAlvlOHlYr.rA p:guisotac eae. Porsetri il__ F'ami._!.Y. :E;quisetum telmateia Ehrh. var. braunii (Milde) ~.1ilde. Giant_Horsetail E. hyemsle L. var. afl'ine (Engelm.) Eaton 11/est<:rn Scourin~?; Rush DIVISION P.r~HOFHY'l'A Class Filicinae Salviniaceae. 'o'i3ter Fern or Sc.1l~inia Family Azolla filiouloides LRm. American ~ater Fern Polypod:i.:o:cene. Fern Fn:nil.y Polypod.ium californicum Kaulf. California Polypody Pityrogramma triangularis (Ksulf.) ·:~axon. Goldback Fern Pol;ysth:hum mnnitum (Kaulf.) Freli.'l. ;!estern f)l.'Or(i. ··~-;r:1 F. c~ l'i.fornic :J.r:J (E9ton) Und.erw. 8alifornia .Jhicld ~<=;!'n Cystopteris fracilis (L.) Bernh. ~rittle 7ern. D~yopteris arguts (Kaulf.) ~att. Coastal flood ~ern AdieP.t'..L"l jordani :1•!uell. C::iliiornia ·.laid.enh<:dr A. ;-.(~datum L. var. aleuticum iiupr. F.ive-fi:J.;er '!:'._!rn T"ce.t'j_di\:-.:n ac;uilinum (L.) Kuhn var. pubescf:r.s Under-.';, Bracken Pe1lr.tea c'\ndromedaef0lia (t<auLf.) Fee. Coffee Fern P, mucrons.ta (.Ea·ton) EB.ton. Ei rds Foot Fern C l:J ss G;y rar.ospcrn~:.te P~~:.~-~- Pine F2.mily :?seur:iotsuga :;nen?..iesii (j\1irb.) Franco. Dou!!l:->s Fir Taxodiaceae. Toxodiu~ F'amill Sequoia sempervircms (Lamb.) Enc'll. Co:-1st Redwood Cln.ss !~ngj_osper:nae Sul,clans ~.'!onocotylerloneae T_vr,hnc~?~Q.~~t-tail Famil,y Typha l~tjfolia L.
    [Show full text]
  • Interim-Programmatic Habitat Conservation Plan (IPHCP), and the Associated Implementing Agreement
    Interim‐Programmatic Habitat Conservation Plan for the Endangered Mount Hermon June Beetle and Ben Lomond Spineflower Prepared for: Citizens of the City of Scotts Valley and County of Santa Cruz Proposing Small-Scale Residential Development Projects in the Zayante Sandhills, Santa Cruz County, California Prepared by: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Ventura, California; Santa Cruz County; and City of Scotts Valley June 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................ 10 1.0 Project Background ....................................................................................................... 10 1.1 Scope of the Interim Programmatic HCP/Permit Duration .......................................... 15 1.2 Regulatory Framework ................................................................................................. 15 1.2.1 Federal Endangered Species Act .......................................................................... 15 1.2.2 National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) ........................................................ 17 1.2.3 California Endangered Species Act ...................................................................... 18 1.2.4 California Environmental Quality Act .................................................................. 18 1.2.5 Sensitive Habitat Protection Ordinance ................................................................ 18 1.2.6 Tree Removal Ordinances ....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Departamento De Biología Vegetal, Escuela Técnica Superior De
    CRECIMIENTO FORESTAL EN EL BOSQUE TROPICAL DE MONTAÑA: EFECTOS DE LA DIVERSIDAD FLORÍSTICA Y DE LA MANIPULACIÓN DE NUTRIENTES. Tesis Doctoral Nixon Leonardo Cumbicus Torres 2015 UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID ESCUELA E.T.S. I. AGRONÓMICA, AGROALIMENTARIA Y DE BIOSISTEMAS DEPARTAMENTO DE BIOTECNOLOGÍA-BIOLOGÍA VEGETAL TESIS DOCTORAL CRECIMIENTO FORESTAL EN EL BOSQUE TROPICAL DE MONTAÑA: EFECTOS DE LA DIVERSIDAD FLORÍSTICA Y DE LA MANIPULACIÓN DE NUTRIENTES. Autor: Nixon Leonardo Cumbicus Torres1 Directores: Dr. Marcelino de la Cruz Rot2, Dr. Jürgen Homeir3 1Departamento de Ciencias Naturales. Universidad Técnica Particular de Loja. 2Área de Biodiversidad y Conservación. Departamento de Biología y Geología, ESCET, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos. 3Ecologia de Plantas. Albrecht von Haller. Instituto de ciencias de Plantas. Georg August University de Göttingen. Madrid, 2015. I Marcelino de la Cruz Rot, Profesor Titular de Área de Biodiversidad y Conservación. Departamento de Biología y Geología, ESCET, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos y Jürgen Homeir, Profesor de Ecologia de Plantas. Albrecht von Haller. Instituto de ciencias de las Plantas. Georg August Universidad de Göttingen CERTIFICAN: Que los trabajos de investigación desarrollados en la memoria de tesis doctoral: “Crecimiento forestal en el bosque tropical de montaña: Efectos de la diversidad florística y de la manipulación de nutrientes.”, han sido realizados bajo su dirección y autorizan que sea presentada para su defensa por Nixon Leonardo Cumbicus Torres ante el Tribunal que en su día se consigne, para aspirar al Grado de Doctor por la Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. VºBº Director Tesis VºBº Director de Tesis Dr. Marcelino de la Cruz Rot Dr. Jürgen Homeir II III Tribunal nombrado por el Mgfco.
    [Show full text]
  • Complete List of Literature Cited* Compiled by Franz Stadler
    AppendixE Complete list of literature cited* Compiled by Franz Stadler Aa, A.J. van der 1859. Francq Van Berkhey (Johanes Le). Pp. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States 194–201 in: Biographisch Woordenboek der Nederlanden, vol. 6. of America 100: 4649–4654. Van Brederode, Haarlem. Adams, K.L. & Wendel, J.F. 2005. Polyploidy and genome Abdel Aal, M., Bohlmann, F., Sarg, T., El-Domiaty, M. & evolution in plants. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 8: 135– Nordenstam, B. 1988. Oplopane derivatives from Acrisione 141. denticulata. Phytochemistry 27: 2599–2602. Adanson, M. 1757. Histoire naturelle du Sénégal. Bauche, Paris. Abegaz, B.M., Keige, A.W., Diaz, J.D. & Herz, W. 1994. Adanson, M. 1763. Familles des Plantes. Vincent, Paris. Sesquiterpene lactones and other constituents of Vernonia spe- Adeboye, O.D., Ajayi, S.A., Baidu-Forson, J.J. & Opabode, cies from Ethiopia. Phytochemistry 37: 191–196. J.T. 2005. Seed constraint to cultivation and productivity of Abosi, A.O. & Raseroka, B.H. 2003. In vivo antimalarial ac- African indigenous leaf vegetables. African Journal of Bio tech- tivity of Vernonia amygdalina. British Journal of Biomedical Science nology 4: 1480–1484. 60: 89–91. Adylov, T.A. & Zuckerwanik, T.I. (eds.). 1993. Opredelitel Abrahamson, W.G., Blair, C.P., Eubanks, M.D. & More- rasteniy Srednei Azii, vol. 10. Conspectus fl orae Asiae Mediae, vol. head, S.A. 2003. Sequential radiation of unrelated organ- 10. Isdatelstvo Fan Respubliki Uzbekistan, Tashkent. isms: the gall fl y Eurosta solidaginis and the tumbling fl ower Afolayan, A.J. 2003. Extracts from the shoots of Arctotis arcto- beetle Mordellistena convicta.
    [Show full text]
  • Kft Holdings, Llc. Zone Change Project Kern County, California
    BIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS REPORT KFT HOLDINGS, LLC. ZONE CHANGE PROJECT KERN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA JANUARY 2019 BIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS REPORT KFT HOLDINGS ZONE CHANGE PROJECT KERN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: KFT Holdings, LLC. 4939 Calloway Drive, Suite 101 Bakersfield, California 93312 Contact Person: Mr. Ankush Kamboj Phone: (661) 399-5846 Consultant: 5080 California Avenue, Suite 220 Bakersfield, CA 93309 Contact: Jaymie Brauer Phone: (661) 616-2600 Fax: (559) 733-7821 January 2019 © Copyright by Quad Knopf, Inc. Unauthorized use prohibited. Project #190016 TABLE OF CONTENTS Acronyms and Abbreviations ........................................................................................................................... iv Executive Summary .............................................................................................................................................. 1 SECTION 1 - Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 2 1.1 - Project Location ........................................................................................................................................... 2 1.2 - Project Description ..................................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 - Purpose, Goals, and Objectives .............................................................................................................. 2 SECTION 2 - Methods ..........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • North Kern Water Storage District Lerdo/Calloway Canal Intertie Project
    Final Environmental Assessment North Kern Water Storage District Lerdo/Calloway Canal Intertie Project EA-09-107 U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Mid Pacific Region South-Central California Area Office Fresno, California December 2009 Mission Statements The mission of the Department of the Interior is to protect and provide access to our Nation’s natural and cultural heritage and honor our trust responsibilities to Indian Tribes and our commitments to island communities. The mission of the Bureau of Reclamation is to manage, develop, and protect water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of the American public. Table of Contents Section 1 Purpose and Need for Action ...................................................... 1 1.1 Background ............................................................................................ 1 1.2 Purpose and Need ................................................................................. 2 1.3 Scope ..................................................................................................... 3 1.4 Potential Issues ...................................................................................... 3 1.5 Related Environmental Documents ........................................................ 3 Section 2 Alternatives Including Proposed Action ..................................... 5 2.1 No Action Alternative ............................................................................. 6 2.2 Proposed Action ....................................................................................
    [Show full text]