DOCSLIB.ORG

Book Review Section Path, from the Local to the Global, That Cannot Be Compiled by John Jenkin* Mon Sense Define Their Ties with the Global

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Book Review Section Path, from the Local to the Global, That Cannot Be Compiled by John Jenkin* Mon Sense Define Their Ties with the Global 'method' indicates, the sciences lay down a certain Book Review Section path, from the local to the global, that cannot be Compiled by John Jenkin* mon sense define their ties with the global. Even if John A. Schuster and Richard R. Yeo (Eds.), we recognise the local character of the rails, we The Politics and Rhetoric of ScientiJic Method: understand that they are laid down in a particular Historical Studies - Australasian Studies in way that allows trains to speed along them; they are History and Philosophy of Science, Vol. 4. not laid down to interrupt, side-track or slow down Dordrecht: Reidel, 1986. 305 pp., $106 the trains. Even if we recognise science as an archi- approx. pelago, how is it that each of the islands has dis- coverers who wave their flag and say that the whole I have always wondered how ancient navigators world is theirs? could, in the name of their Sovereign, occupy terri- Since, for an edited volume, this book has a tories dozens of times greater than their own simply remarkable unity of intent, it seems reasonable to by planting a flag and saying a prayer. This interest- comment on it as if there was but one author. The ing book is about the ways tiny groups of scientists book is divided into two main parts. The introduc- are able to plant a flag and claim ownership of vast tion and the first two chapters are the most domains they will never be able to fully colonize. ambitious, and try to uproot what has been taken Is science universal? Of course it is, or such is, at for granted as the scientific method of the great least, what used to be its most essential trait. heroes - Newton, Galileo, Descartes. The second Beliefs, religions, customs, laws, even ethics are part is less ambitious but nicely documented: what hopelessly local and peculiar, but the results of sci- is the use of 'method talk' in scientific contro- ence escape these contingencies and are universally versies; when others fail, tell your colleague that valid. Indeed, this is a tautological definition: there they are not 'really' doing science. are valid scientific results only in so far as they are Feyerabend's work on Galileo rendered a great universal. disservice to the study of science by using polemi- Then things began to deteriorate. Studies by his- cally the bizzare notion of propaganda. Galileo was torians, sociologists and even anthropologists accused, 'not only' to discipline rigorously 'but also' tended to break down the universality of science to indulge in propaganda. This is a most damaging and replace it by local, technical, crafted, idiosyn- definition of rhetoric, since, inevitably, defenders cratic achievements. Writers as different as of science point out that 'in addition' to a flourish Duhem, Koyre, Kuhn, Collins and Shapin made of rhetoric, Galileo did demonstrate some of his many diffident about the universality of scientific laws. Then we are back where we started; that is, principles. A new, much more fragmented picture with a dichotomy between rhetoric and the rest, the of science started to emerge. Universality is a real science. The author of the first chapter, pleasant myth of science as it is taught, but it is not Chalmers, rightly debunks Feyerabend's pretention. a property of science as it is made. Sciences are no After all, if Galileo wished to propagate his results, more universal than the freeways or the railways. to extend them, to generalise them, then propa- To be sure they extend in many directions, but not ganda is just one way among very many; the inven- everywhere, and certainly not for free. Instead of tion of mathematical physics is another, that allows being a continuous land, blotted here and there by one to go on from one result to another. Equations a few pockets of disorder, the sciences are now often themselves trace a fascinating path from the local seen as an archipelago of tiny islands, disseminated (the variables) to the global (the structure of the over a vast sea. equation itself). Why call rhetoric the first, if no This new picture, however, also has its short- study of the second is made? comings, and this is where the book under review Unfortunately, Feyerabend's dualist position con- enters the discussion and makes a valuable contri- taminates even Chalmers, who cannot find a com- bution. Although the sciences are practised in local, mon ground for all operations of propagation and is isolated and contingent settings, they do claim to be forced (p. 23) to reintroduce the dichotomy he universal, and this claim is to be taken seriously. wished to attack: 'as far as the creation of social No-one has ever heard a scientist boast at once that space for the new science is concerned, it is cer- his or her results are local, temporary, tainly the case that there was much more involved irreproducible, impossible to expand, and not tied than rational argument, given the variety of to any other fact or theory. Even the social interests at stake'. Ah, this little 'more than': how constructionists who insist on local studies of scien- many crimes have been committed in your name, tific practice pride themselves on the universal val- whether on the side of the old Whiggish positivism idity of their method; they do not suggest that is is or, as is now the case, on the side of social a local, isolated achievement that leads nowhere. historians. Even Feyerabend turns his own destructive method Methods play in science the same role as consti- into another '-ism'; he favours anarchism. Thus tutions do in politics. Although sociologists can there is something essential, if not in method, at argue that no-one ever follows exactly their rules, least in claims to method. As the very name nevertheless, the constitution plays much more than a cosmetic role. It organises assent and dissent, *Dr. J.G. Jenkin is a Reader in Physics at La Trobe University, loyalties and procedures. The methods of Galileo or Bundoora, Victoria, 3083. Descartes cannot be dismissed as window-dressing, Historrcal Records ofAustralian Science, 7 (3) (December 1988) because they are as important as Hobbes' social Historical Records ofAustralian Science, Volume 7, Number 3 it is local, but it is our way; we love it or leave it and contract or the Declaration of Independence. do our own thing'. This sort of talk does indeed Galileo's decision to believe mathematical physics occur, as nicely illustrated by the folk-sociology of instead of common sense in experimental matters is as important as Descartes' reshuMing of who science collated by Sapp. But it is never officially should be trusted. articulated as an acceptable way of talking. Is this The first one is taken seriously by Chalmers, but reworking an ideology or a legitimisation of what the second is treated as a mere literary resource - really happens, as some remarks of the authors too in the old sense of the expression - by Schuster. often suggest? Or is the notion of paradigm simply Schuster's chapter is an interesting case of self- wrong? Of course, in many instances an appeal is contradiction. He does not hesitate to offer a uni- made to method when everything else has failed; it versal definition of methodology, from the Greek to is the last straw to break the camel's back. But this the present day - deleting the constant dispute does not solve the problem. Although there is no between scholastic rhetoric, Renaissance Platonism unique definition of science, and although groups and Cartesian rhetoric - in a book dedicated to the disagree on what is and is not good science, few can local achievements of scientists; and he criticises resist the temptation to talk of a universal method. the whole literature on Descartes for its failure to If there is no common method, then something see his rules of method as a literary trick, without essential to science is threatened. If the local realising that this is indeed the success of Descartes idiosyncrasies of paradigms are accepted as such, - to have provided the resources, the vocabulary, science ceases to exist. the tricks, the formats, for everyone else thereafter, The book as a whole takes this problem less including Cartesian scholars and Schuster himself seriously than one might expect from the Introduc- in his formalised presentation. If this equipment tion. Generally, it is suggested that there is bad faith had been seen as a literary trick, it would have lost involved in the scientists' flag waving. It seems that strength immediately. Why? Because Descartes, they could or should do without method talk, if they like Boyle, invented the very distinction between were honest and not self-serving and self-righteous. literature (or rhetoric) and demonstrated (or exper- But it might very well be the case that methods play imental) science. The definition of rhetoric and the same role in science as standards do in industry. literature used by Schuster to explain Descartes has Each industry, each country, imposes its own stan- been made unfit for this sort of usage by Descartes dards in order to build its own markets. It cannot himself do without standardisation, for it is an essential Bacon, Boyle and Descartes may never have lived part of that which makes an industrial product up to their rules of method, but they invented a way industrial rather than (say) craft. The fierce fights of proceeding from the local to the global. for computer compatibility offer a parallel with the Descartes, like Leibniz, was fascinated, as Schuster ruthless debates among scientists to define what a rightly points out, by the model offered by algebra good, respectable science should look like.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Raising the Bar Sydney 2018 Warwick Holmes – to Infinity and Beyond
    Raising the Bar Sydney 2018 Warwick Holmes – To infinity and beyond Welcome to the podcast series of "Raising the Bar Sydney." Raising the bar in 2018 saw 20 University of Sydney academics take their research out of the lecture theatre and into bars across Sydney, all on one night. In this podcast, you'll hear Warrick Holmes' talk, "To Infinity and beyond." Enjoy the talk. [ Applause ] Okay, ladies and gentlemen, thank you very much indeed for coming this evening to the University of Sydney's "Raising The Bar." The theme of my talk tonight is titled, and I've just forgotten what it is, "To Infinity and Beyond." That's right. Okay. So, tonight I'm going to be presenting to you some themes about space engineering and space science. And the relevance to Australia. And I'm going tp put this in the format of giving you some antidotes about space engineering and some of the history of engineering in Australia. Before I start, I just want to check that you've all got the right drinks, because this a bar. I understand there's some interesting space cocktails here tonight. So, I tonight have a Bailey's Comet with me, you see, Bailey's Comet. There's Pink Galactic Garbo Blasters I believe courtesy of Douglas Adams. And did you know that there was a crater on the moon called beer crater, which I just feel is appropriate somehow for tonight. So, because we're in a bar, I think the general theme I have, I'm going to ask you some questions first of all and then half an hour later you're going to ask me questions, okay.
    [Show full text]
  • Golden Yearbook
    Golden Yearbook Golden Yearbook Stories from graduates of the 1930s to the 1960s Foreword from the Vice-Chancellor and Principal ���������������������������������������������������������5 Message from the Chancellor ��������������������������������7 — Timeline of significant events at the University of Sydney �������������������������������������8 — The 1930s The Great Depression ������������������������������������������ 13 Graduates of the 1930s ���������������������������������������� 14 — The 1940s Australia at war ��������������������������������������������������� 21 Graduates of the 1940s ����������������������������������������22 — The 1950s Populate or perish ���������������������������������������������� 47 Graduates of the 1950s ����������������������������������������48 — The 1960s Activism and protest ������������������������������������������155 Graduates of the 1960s ���������������������������������������156 — What will tomorrow bring? ��������������������������������� 247 The University of Sydney today ���������������������������248 — Index ����������������������������������������������������������������250 Glossary ����������������������������������������������������������� 252 Produced by Marketing and Communications, the University of Sydney, December 2016. Disclaimer: The content of this publication includes edited versions of original contributions by University of Sydney alumni and relevant associated content produced by the University. The views and opinions expressed are those of the alumni contributors and do
    [Show full text]
  • Maverick Mathematician And, As He Put It, ‘Moyal’S More General Knowledge of European Work in the Theory of Stochastic Processes Was a Considerable Stimulus to Me’
    Chapter 4. The Widening Circle With the war's end, Joe Moyal was poised to enter another life. His reputation at De Havilland's had continued to rise and he was offered the job of developing a guidance system for the `Black Knight' missile which would combine a mixture of the electronic and electrical engineering which, as he put it, he had `exploited during the war'. But he had had enough of the technology of warfare. `I was sick of war and research on war', he reflected later, and he was anxious to make revisions and headway on his quantum paper and extend his research in mathematics, physics and statistics. His intellectual circle, moreover, was widening and moving him into congenial fields. His wartime contacts included his supportive Cambridge contacts, Maurice Bartlett and Dr. Harold Jeffries and, via Professor Fowler, other members of the Department of Mathematics. Figure 4.1. Maurice Bartlett, statistician – a valuable ally and colleague of Joe’s J. Gani Private collection. Maurice Bartlett was destined to become one of Britain's major statisticians. A scholarship boy at Queen's College, Cambridge, he had taken his first degree in mathematics, soaked up courses on statistical 45 mechanics with Ralph Fowler and statistical sources with Colin Clark, studied quantum mechanics with Paul Dirac, and launched into early research in mathematical statistics in his fourth year, publishing his first papers as a student. Graduating in 1933, he became an assistant lecturer in the new Statistics Department at University College, London, where he worked (among others) with the new Galton Professor, R.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Iss-Archives.Pdf
    Contents Introduction: The International Science School ............................................................................... 3 Our Story ............................................................................................................................................... 4 ISS2017: Future Power ....................................................................................................................... 6 ISS2015: BIG ........................................................................................................................................ 8 ISS2013: NANOSCIENCE ................................................................................................................ 11 ISS 2011: Light & Matter ................................................................................................................... 14 ISS2009: Genes to Galaxies ............................................................................................................ 17 ISS2007: ecoscience ......................................................................................................................... 20 ISS2005: Waves of the Future ......................................................................................................... 23 ISS2003: Impact Science .................................................................................................................. 26 ISS2001: Impact Science .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Science Foundation for Physics Within the University of Sydney
    FACULTY OF SCIENCE SCIENCE FOUNDATION FOR PHYSICS WITHIN THE UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY ANNUAL REPORT 2009 1 SCIENCE FOUNDATION PRESIDENT’S REPORT FOR PHYSICS 2009 WITHIN THE UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY It is my pleasure to present the 2009 Annual Report of the Science Foundation for Physics. In 2009 the Foundation joined the wider scientific community in celebrating the International Year of Astronomy, the 400th anniversary of Galileo’s first use of the telescope, the 150th Students test robot anniversary of the publication of Darwin’s On the Origin of designs for Martian Species and the 40th anniversary of the Apollo 11 Moon landscapes during the landing. 35th Professor Harry The highlight of the Foundation’s year was the 35th Professor Messel International Harry Messel International Science School (ISS), titled ‘Genes Science School to Galaxies’ (a theme chosen to highlight those anniversaries). Harry’s vision when he created the ISS was to take the best and brightest students in Australia and from abroad, to treat them as adults, to immerse them in science, to push them hard and to instill in them a commitment to excellence in all things that they do. This year’s ISS, like those in past years, amply Trevor Danos greets the two Canadian ISS scholars with the Australian The Science Foundation flag on stage at Rivers College, Manitoba, Canada for Physics, established fulfilled that vision. in 1954 by Emeritus The 2009 ISS scholars were privileged to learn from world class scientists, researchers and engineers. They were told program and its University of Sydney connections (held in the Professor Harry Messel about leading-edge science.
    [Show full text]
  • Maverick Mathematician: the Life and Science of J.E. Moyal
    MAVERICK MATHEMATICIAN The Life and Science of J.E. Moyal MAVERICK MATHEMATICIAN The Life and Science of J.E. Moyal Ann Moyal Published by ANU E Press The Australian National University Canberra ACT 0200, Australia Email: [email protected] Web: http://epress.anu.edu.au National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Moyal, Ann (Ann Mozley), 1926- . Maverick mathematician : the life and science of J.E. Moyal. Includes index. ISBN 1 920942 58 0 (pbk). ISBN 1 920942 59 9 (online) 1. Moyal, J. E. 2. Dirac, P. A. M. (Paul Adrien Maurice), 1902- - Correspondence. 3. Mathematicians - Australia - Biography. 4. Aerospace engineers - Australia - Biography. 5. Quantum theory - Mathematics. I. Title. 510.92 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Indexed by Dr Ann Moyal. Cover design by Teresa Prowse. Portrait by Linda Phillips, 1992. This edition © 2006 ANU E Press To Mimi Hurley, my sister and J.E.M.’s friend. Table of Contents Acknowledgements vii Preface xi Chapter 1. Boyhood 1 Chapter 2. The Making of a Scientific Maverick 9 Chapter 3. Battle With a Legend 19 Chapter 4. The Widening Circle 45 Chapter 5. Antipodean Winds 61 Chapter 6. Argonne National Laboratory 79 Chapter 7. Macquarie University 91 Chapter 8. The Reflective Years 103 Appendix I. Publications of J.E. Moyal 119 Appendix II. P.A.M. Dirac – J. E. Moyal: Correspondence, 1944-1946. Basser Library, Australian Academy of Science, Canberra, MS 45/3/ 123 Appendix III.
    [Show full text]
  • The Beryllia Project 4.1 Introduction the Australian Atomic Energy
    95 4 WE NEED SECRETS TO TRADE: The Beryllia Project 4.1 Introduction The Australian Atomic Energy Commission, in 1954, had a head office, a scientific staff, most of whom were overseas training at Harwell, and a local administrative staff. It now needed a project. Ideally the project could be used for further training of staff, but more importantly it had to be in an area that was not the focus of other research groups. Since atomic energy research had come under the 'defence' banner on the international stage (not just Australia), Australia needed its own secrets to trade with other nations. Australia aimed to join the nuclear club**™" as a full and independent member. Australia also wanted a nuclear reactor. There was some debate as what type of reactor was wanted. Tom Playford, the Premier of South Australia had no doubts, he wanted a power reactor for his state. Playford was a great advocate of South Australian industrialisation, immigration and state economic independence. South Australia had the uranium deposits to run such a reactor and the state needed power to become industrialised. Further, as a state with very limited water supplies, a nuclear reactor sited near the ocean could also act as a desalination plant. Playford would attempt to convince the Commonwealth to allow a nuclear reactor to be established in South Australia. This reactor would never be planned let alone developed. This chapter will focus on the research work that was conducted within the AAEC in the period up to approximately 1967. The early period of research xxxviS In 1954 the 'nuclear club' included the US, Britain, Canada, France, and the USSR.
    [Show full text]
  • Sir Philip Baxter, Engineer: the Fabric of a Conservative Style of Thought
    SIR PHILIP BAXTER, ENGINEER: THE FABRIC OF A CONSERVATIVE STYLE OF THOUGHT PHILIP GISSING A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Science and Technology Studies University of N.S.W. AUGUST, 1999 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am especially grateful to my supervisor, Dr David Miller, of the School of Science and Technology Studies, UNSW, for his astute comments and patient consideration of the issues raised by my evolving research. In the course of my research, I spent many happy hours in the University Archives, and wish to record here my deep appreciation of the unstinting support given me by the University Archivist Laurie Dillon and the staff of the Archives. At one stage, Laurie had interviewed Baxter on behalf of the university’s oral history project, and was personally responsible for the removal of his papers to the Archives following his death. I therefore benefited from Laurie’s deeper than usual understanding of my subject. It would be appropriate here too to thank the members of Sir Philip Baxter’s immediate family, his son Denis, and his daughter and son- in-law Valerie and Brian Craven, for their hospitality and frankness during visits I paid to them. Denis Baxter also made available to me the books and papers of his father in his possession, and provided me with a typescript of the play that became a focus of my research. Although the full extent of my personal debts could never be adequately set forth here, I would like to thank the staff and students of the School of Science and Technology Studies for their continued encouragement over a period of time that proved to be more protracted than I (and perhaps even they) could have possibly imagined when I embarked on my PhD research.
    [Show full text]
  • AINSE — an Institute for Research and Training Excellence in Nuclear Science ———— the First 50 Years
    AINSE — An institute for research and training excellence in nuclear science ———— The First 50 Years A history of the Australian Institute of Nuclear Science and Engineering Brian H O’Connor, Allan R Chivas, Dennis W Mather, John D C Studdert, Anna E Binnie 2008 ISBN 978-0-9758434-5-1 © AINSE 2008 This book is copyright. The Copyright Act 1968 permits fair dealing for study, research, news reporting, criticism or review. Selected passages, tables or diagrams may be reproduced for such purposes provided acknowledgement of the source is included. Major extracts or the entire document may not be reproduced by any process without written permission of the Managing Director, AINSE. Managing Director, AINSE PMB1 Menai NSW 2234 Authors E/Professor Brian H O’Connor, Curtin University of Technology Professor Allan R Chivas, University of Wollongong Dr Dennis W Mather, AINSE Mr John D C Studdert, AINSE Dr Anna E Binnie, Visiting Fellow, The University of New South Wales Printed in Australia by Pegasus Printing Unit 6 Harcourt Estate 809-821 Botany Road Rosebery NSW 2018 ii Foreword This volume has its origins in May 2005 with the 50th anniversary of the Australian Institute of Nuclear Science and Engineering (AINSE) in 2008 looming, and with the imminent closure of the HIFAR research reactor rapidly approaching as HIFAR neared the end of almost 50 years as a servant of the Australian research community. The AINSE Executive Committee believed that this presented an opportunity for AINSE to reflect on its achievements during the HIFAR era and also to look ahead to the contribution that AINSE might play over the next 50 years which would become the OPAL era.
    [Show full text]
  • Mark Oliphant and the Invisible College of the Peaceful Atom
    The University of Notre Dame Australia ResearchOnline@ND Theses 2019 Mark Oliphant and the Invisible College of the Peaceful Atom Darren Holden The University of Notre Dame Australia Follow this and additional works at: https://researchonline.nd.edu.au/theses Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969 WARNING The material in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any further copying or communication of this material by you may be the subject of copyright protection under the Act. Do not remove this notice. Publication Details Holden, D. (2019). Mark Oliphant and the Invisible College of the Peaceful Atom (Doctor of Philosophy (College of Arts and Science)). University of Notre Dame Australia. https://researchonline.nd.edu.au/theses/270 This dissertation/thesis is brought to you by ResearchOnline@ND. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses by an authorized administrator of ResearchOnline@ND. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Frontispiece: British Group associated with the Manhattan Project (Mark Oliphant Group), Nuclear Physics Research Laboratory, University of Liverpool, Mount Pleasant, Liverpool. 1944. Photograph by Donald Cooksey. General Records of the Department of Energy (record group 434). National Archives (US) Arc Identifier 7665196. https://catalog.archives.gov/id/7665196 Reproduced for non-commercial purposes. Copyright retained by The University of California. DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Mark Oliphant And the Invisible College of the Peaceful Atom A thesis submitted in the fulfilment of a Doctor of Philosophy Darren Holden The University of Notre Dame Australia Submitted February 2019, revised June 2019 ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS As this work has attempted to demonstrate: discovery is not possible in isolation.
    [Show full text]
  • Portraits in SCIENCE
    Portraits IN SCIENCE Compiled and introduced by ANN MOYAL SCIENCE IS ONE of the most important intellectual and cultural forces of the twentieth century, yet surprisingly little is known in Australia of the lives of this country's key scientific men and women and of the contributions they have made to enlarging the boundaries of scientific knowledge. Among these interviews compiled and introduced by Ann Moyal there are two physicists, Sir Mark Oliphant and Professor Harry Messel, and three medical researchers in immunology, human genetics and the brain—Sir Gustav Nossal, Professor Susan Serjeantson and Professor Peter Bishop. Others interviewed include an animal geneticist, Dr Helen Newton Turner; ecologist, biologist and Chief Scientist, Professor Ralph Slatyer; Dr Elizabeth Truswell, a palynologist; Dr Paul Wild, a radiophysicist; and Professor Ted Ringwood, physicist. There are also lively interviews with science communicators, Robyn Williams and Dr Michael Gore. Together the group encompasses the innovative application of scientific knowledge since the 1930s; the foundation of scientific research institutions; high-level Australian representation in international science; and policy development and public education in science. They reveal their formative influences, diversely rewarding experiences and outstanding commitment to their demanding and challenging work. This is an impressive record offering evocative reflections and inspiring achievements. Cover: 'The Great Australian Desert by Night (with the world famous giant telescope at Parkes, NSW)', tapestry by Mathieu Mategot in the National Library of Australia. Portraits IN SCIENCE Compiled and introduced by ANN MOYAL Portraits IN SCIENCE Compiled and introduced by ANN MOYAL National Library of Australia Published with the assistance of the Morris West Trust Fund © National Library of Australia 1994 National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Portraits in science.
    [Show full text]
  • March 1975 Science Foundation for Physics
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF THE SCIENCE FOUNDATION FOR PHYSICS & THE SCHOOL OF PHYSICS WITHIN THE UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY MARCH 1975 SCIENCE FOUNDATION FOR PHYSICS Council Chairman W. M. Leonard J. Keith Campbell Councillor D. B. Curruthcrs J. I. Dryburgh Sir George Fisher T. J. N. Foley H. D. Huyei R. J. Kirby C. W. Love J. M. Lowe P. K. MacGregor J. F. McNicoi F. V. Mitchell Sir Robert Norman Mr K. F. B. Packer John R. Slade or Paul H. Slade Mr A. S. Storey R. W. R. Wiltshire Liaison Member I. McCloy Ex Officio Chancellor of the University of Sydney Deputy Chancellor Vice-Chancellor and Principal Deputy Principal Chairman, Senate Finance Committee Professor and Head of the School of Physics and Director of the Foundation Executive Officers Director Professor H. Messel Secretary Oscar Guth Asst Secretary Miss Rita Knight Hon. Secretary Rear-Admiral H. A. Showers, R.A.N. Ret. Highlight of the Yean GOVERNMENT GRANT FOR NEW ASTRONOMICAL INSTRUMENT LlGHLIGHT of the year was the announcement by the Australian Government in its 1974-75 Budget that it had "approved in principle a grant 10 the University of Sydney to construct a large Stellar Interferometer", as a successor to the existing Stellar Intensity Interferometer at the Narrabri Observatory of the School of Physics. The Government included in its Budget an initial grant of S75 000 for a detailed design study of the new instrument and, as a consequence, this design study has already been started by Professor R. Hanbury-Brown and his team of scientists in the Chatterton Astronomy Department.
    [Show full text]