Sir Philip Baxter, Engineer: the Fabric of a Conservative Style of Thought

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Sir Philip Baxter, Engineer: the Fabric of a Conservative Style of Thought SIR PHILIP BAXTER, ENGINEER: THE FABRIC OF A CONSERVATIVE STYLE OF THOUGHT PHILIP GISSING A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Science and Technology Studies University of N.S.W. AUGUST, 1999 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am especially grateful to my supervisor, Dr David Miller, of the School of Science and Technology Studies, UNSW, for his astute comments and patient consideration of the issues raised by my evolving research. In the course of my research, I spent many happy hours in the University Archives, and wish to record here my deep appreciation of the unstinting support given me by the University Archivist Laurie Dillon and the staff of the Archives. At one stage, Laurie had interviewed Baxter on behalf of the university’s oral history project, and was personally responsible for the removal of his papers to the Archives following his death. I therefore benefited from Laurie’s deeper than usual understanding of my subject. It would be appropriate here too to thank the members of Sir Philip Baxter’s immediate family, his son Denis, and his daughter and son- in-law Valerie and Brian Craven, for their hospitality and frankness during visits I paid to them. Denis Baxter also made available to me the books and papers of his father in his possession, and provided me with a typescript of the play that became a focus of my research. Although the full extent of my personal debts could never be adequately set forth here, I would like to thank the staff and students of the School of Science and Technology Studies for their continued encouragement over a period of time that proved to be more protracted than I (and perhaps even they) could have possibly imagined when I embarked on my PhD research. In particular, I would like to acknowledge the friendship and support of David Oldroyd (my associate supervisor), Randall Albury, Paul Brown, Guy Freeland, Tony Corones, Gavan McDonnell, John Merson, Peter Slezak, Yvonne Luxford, Valentino Migotto, Lachlann Partridge, Harshi Gunawardena, Jo Wodak, Soula Georgiadis and Jorg Illi. I acknowledge specific debts to some of these people below, but for now let me say that the spirit of collegiality that I encountered in the School of Science and Technology Studies will remain an enduring memory of my time there. As I write these lines, I am reminded that as long ago as 1989, it was my enrolment in a first year subject called ‘The 17th Century Intellectual Revolution,’ taught by David Oldroyd and Tony Corones, that first stimulated my interest in STS. It is appropriate to mention here too the support I received as a casual tutor in the Department for the History and Philosophy of Science at the University of Sydney, specifically from the co-ordinators of HPS 2, Allan Chalmers and Michael Shortland. My thanks to them both, and also to Shari Lee. Dr Paul Brown kindly read Chapter 7, which benefited greatly from his comments, while Nigel Smith, a fellow PhD student in the School of Sociology, performed a similar service with regard to the material on Mannheim. Naturally, neither of them should be blamed for any remaining solecisms. I would also like to acknowledge here the encouragement and support of Dr Jim Franklin of the School of Mathematics, who on more than one occasion alerted me to sources that I might otherwise not have come across (specific debts of this kind are acknowledged in the endnotes). Throughout the period of research and writing, the Reader Services staff of the UNSW Library gave invaluable assistance with inter- library loans and CD-ROM bibliographic searches. The Sydney office of the Australian Archives was also very helpful, as was Tim Sherratt of the Australian Science Archives Project in Canberra, where I was able to consult the papers of Sir Ernest Titterton. I would also like to note here that during the period of writing and research, I was employed from time to time in a number of administrative areas of the university, specifically Undergraduate Admissions, the International Office, and the Office of the Faculty of Arts. In their own way, the relationships I developed here have helped to sustain me as much as my relationships with academic supervisors and colleagues. I would like to acknowledge specific debts to Anita Anderson, Margaret Scott, Graham Mayne, Randall Albury, Helen Milfull, and the members of the Admissions and Re- enrolment Committee of the Board of Studies in Science and Mathematics in the years when I acted as its Secretary. It is appropriate to end these reflections with an acknowledgement of the role played in my life by my family, Roseanne, Philippa and Genevieve. May we long make music together! TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. 1. CHAPTER ONE 1 The Foul Sluggard’s Comfort 2. CHAPTER TWO 42 The Conservatism of Philip Baxter 3. CHAPTER THREE 72 Philip Baxter’s Other Island 4. CHAPTER FOUR 103 Baxter and the Atom 5. CHAPTER FIVE 135 Adventures in Redbrick 6. CHAPTER SIX 177 Engineering and the Community 7. CHAPTER SEVEN 207 The Gospel of St Philip Baxter 8. CHAPTER EIGHT 254 Concluding Remarks BIBLIOGRAPHY 270 APPENDIX 277 Typescript of The Day the Sun Rose in the West ABSTRACT This thesis is concerned with the life and career of Sir Philip Baxter (1905-1989), particularly during the period following his arrival in Australia from England in 1950. But the thesis is not a conventional biographical study in terms of either the sources used or its guiding themes. Instead, my subject’s values and attitudes are portrayed as reflections of a ‘conservative style of thought’, a concept developed by Karl Mannheim. This approach, centred on close readings of key texts, permits a deeper understanding of a figure who polarised opinion over a long career as Chairman of the Australian Atomic Energy Commission, and as Vice-Chancellor of the University of NSW. My picture of Baxter draws significantly on the Archives of the University of NSW, which provided the bulk of my primary sources, such as correspondence files, typescripts of articles and talks, newspaper clippings, official documents and personal memorabilia. This material is a substantial but curiously unrevealing source for Baxter’s life. Although I rely largely on written material, on several important occasions I refer to discussions I had with Baxter’s children, colleagues and students. Insights thereby gained into Baxter’s childhood reading, and the circumstances of the composition of his play, The Day the Sun Rose in the West, profoundly influenced my portrayal of Baxter. Throughout, I argue for an appreciation of the significance of such material, even though in a more conventional study of an engineer/administrator it would be thought of only marginal interest. In Baxter’s case, certainly, careful interpretation of such material enables the construction of a compelling portrait of the man despite the unrevealing primary records and the still often fervently partisan personal recollections of those who knew him. My major conclusion is that previous characterisations of Baxter as a cold war warrior of the post-war period in Australia have failed to appreciate the complexity and coherence of his attitudes and philosophy. Secondly, I demonstrate that the notion of a ‘conservative style of thought’ captures that complexity as evidenced in the many facets of Baxter’s career and interests. 1 CHAPTER ONE THE FOUL SLUGGARD’S COMFORT How inexpressibly comfortable to know our fellow creature... not only to see into him, but even to see out of him, to view the world altogether as he views it.— 1 Thomas Carlyle This nineteenth century explanation of the fascination of biography provides a useful starting point for my work on Sir Philip Baxter. In itself, it serves as a justification for my enterprise, as being potentially a source of ‘inexpressible comfort,’ but more to the point, it stresses the importance of the outward view. To ‘see into’ someone is but the first step in our acquisition of knowledge about them, since it need take no account of ‘the world’ at all. My thesis focuses on the second step, the higher order task of ‘seeing out’ of my subject, which necessarily involves sensitive contextualisation of his activities and ideas. ‘The world,’ however we may wish to define it, is inevitably involved here, and it is hardly surprising that the main theoretical concepts around which I have organised my reflections come from the discipline of sociology. My major conclusion is that previous characterisations of Baxter as a cold war warrior of the post-war period in Australia have failed to appreciate the complexity and coherence of his attitudes and philosophy. Further, I argue that that coherence is best apprehended and delineated through the sociological conception, due to Mannheim, of the ‘conservative style of thought.’ This receives a full discussion in Chapter Two, but it is worth noting here that the word ‘style’ has been carefully chosen, 2 to forestall any expectations that what is intended is a systematic exposition of ideas, with explicit logical connections. To attempt to develop such a system is to divorce the ideas from their social context and, in terms of Carlyle’s dichotomy, to suppose that we can discover them by ‘looking into’ someone. My view on the other hand is determinedly outward, unfolding and developing through a series of separate, but related studies of Baxter in a variety of contexts. Before embarking on these detailed studies, though, I feel that it would be helpful to address a number of important methodological questions, and assemble some of the basic materials on which subsequent chapters are based. Hence the sequence of ‘preliminary remarks’ which constitutes the rest of this chapter.
Recommended publications
  • Rutherford's Nuclear World: the Story of the Discovery of the Nuc
    Rutherford's Nuclear World: The Story of the Discovery of the Nuc... http://www.aip.org/history/exhibits/rutherford/sections/atop-physic... HOME SECTIONS CREDITS EXHIBIT HALL ABOUT US rutherford's explore the atom learn more more history of learn about aip's nuclear world with rutherford about this site physics exhibits history programs Atop the Physics Wave ShareShareShareShareShareMore 9 RUTHERFORD BACK IN CAMBRIDGE, 1919–1937 Sections ← Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next → In 1962, John Cockcroft (1897–1967) reflected back on the “Miraculous Year” ( Annus mirabilis ) of 1932 in the Cavendish Laboratory: “One month it was the neutron, another month the transmutation of the light elements; in another the creation of radiation of matter in the form of pairs of positive and negative electrons was made visible to us by Professor Blackett's cloud chamber, with its tracks curled some to the left and some to the right by powerful magnetic fields.” Rutherford reigned over the Cavendish Lab from 1919 until his death in 1937. The Cavendish Lab in the 1920s and 30s is often cited as the beginning of modern “big science.” Dozens of researchers worked in teams on interrelated problems. Yet much of the work there used simple, inexpensive devices — the sort of thing Rutherford is famous for. And the lab had many competitors: in Paris, Berlin, and even in the U.S. Rutherford became Cavendish Professor and director of the Cavendish Laboratory in 1919, following the It is tempting to simplify a complicated story. Rutherford directed the Cavendish Lab footsteps of J.J. Thomson. Rutherford died in 1937, having led a first wave of discovery of the atom.
    [Show full text]
  • The Development of Military Nuclear Strategy And
    The Development of Military Nuclear Strategy and Anglo-American Relations, 1939 – 1958 Submitted by: Geoffrey Charles Mallett Skinner to the University of Exeter as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History, July 2018 This thesis is available for Library use on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. I certify that all material in this thesis which is not my own work has been identified and that no material has previously been submitted and approved for the award of a degree by this or any other University. (Signature) ……………………………………………………………………………… 1 Abstract There was no special governmental partnership between Britain and America during the Second World War in atomic affairs. A recalibration is required that updates and amends the existing historiography in this respect. The wartime atomic relations of those countries were cooperative at the level of science and resources, but rarely that of the state. As soon as it became apparent that fission weaponry would be the main basis of future military power, America decided to gain exclusive control over the weapon. Britain could not replicate American resources and no assistance was offered to it by its conventional ally. America then created its own, closed, nuclear system and well before the 1946 Atomic Energy Act, the event which is typically seen by historians as the explanation of the fracturing of wartime atomic relations. Immediately after 1945 there was insufficient systemic force to create change in the consistent American policy of atomic monopoly. As fusion bombs introduced a new magnitude of risk, and as the nuclear world expanded and deepened, the systemic pressures grew.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the Sir Mark Oliphant International Frontiers of Science and Technology Australian Geothermal Energy Conference Record 2008/18 Gurgenci, H
    GEOSCIENCE AUSTRALIA Sir Mark Oliphant Conferences – International Frontiers of Science and Technology Proceedings of the Sir Mark Oliphant International Frontiers of Science and Technology Australian Geothermal Energy Conference Record 2008/18 Gurgenci, H. and Budd, A.R. APPLYING GEOSCIENCE TO AUSTRALIA’S MOST IMPORTANT CHALLENGES Proceedings of the Sir Mark Oliphant International Frontiers of Science and Technology Australian Geothermal Energy Conference GEOSCIENCE AUSTRALIA RECORD 2008/18 Edited by Hal Gurgenci 1 and Anthony Budd 2 1 Queensland Geothermal Energy Centre, The University of Queensland, St Lucia 4072 2 Geoscience Australia, GPO Box 378, Canberra, ACT 2601 Department of Resources, Energy and Tourism Minister for Resources and Energy: The Hon. Martin Ferguson, AM MP Secretary: Dr Peter Boxall Geoscience Australia Chief Executive Officer: Dr Neil Williams PSM © Commonwealth of Australia, 2008 This work is copyright. Apart from any fair dealings for the purpose of study, research, criticism, or review, as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission. Copyright is the responsibility of the Chief Executive Officer, Geoscience Australia. Requests and enquiries should be directed to the Chief Executive Officer, Geoscience Australia, GPO Box 378 Canberra ACT 2601. Geoscience Australia has tried to make the information in this product as accurate as possible. However, it does not guarantee that the information is totally accurate or complete. Therefore, you should not solely rely on this information when making a commercial decision. ISSN 1448-2177 ISBN 978 1 921498 19 0 GeoCat # 67255 Recommended bibliographic reference: Gurgenci, H. and Budd, A.R. (editors), 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • A Selected Bibliography of Publications By, and About, J
    A Selected Bibliography of Publications by, and about, J. Robert Oppenheimer Nelson H. F. Beebe University of Utah Department of Mathematics, 110 LCB 155 S 1400 E RM 233 Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0090 USA Tel: +1 801 581 5254 FAX: +1 801 581 4148 E-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] (Internet) WWW URL: http://www.math.utah.edu/~beebe/ 17 March 2021 Version 1.47 Title word cross-reference $1 [Duf46]. $12.95 [Edg91]. $13.50 [Tho03]. $14.00 [Hug07]. $15.95 [Hen81]. $16.00 [RS06]. $16.95 [RS06]. $17.50 [Hen81]. $2.50 [Opp28g]. $20.00 [Hen81, Jor80]. $24.95 [Fra01]. $25.00 [Ger06]. $26.95 [Wol05]. $27.95 [Ger06]. $29.95 [Goo09]. $30.00 [Kev03, Kle07]. $32.50 [Edg91]. $35 [Wol05]. $35.00 [Bed06]. $37.50 [Hug09, Pol07, Dys13]. $39.50 [Edg91]. $39.95 [Bad95]. $8.95 [Edg91]. α [Opp27a, Rut27]. γ [LO34]. -particles [Opp27a]. -rays [Rut27]. -Teilchen [Opp27a]. 0-226-79845-3 [Guy07, Hug09]. 0-8014-8661-0 [Tho03]. 0-8047-1713-3 [Edg91]. 0-8047-1714-1 [Edg91]. 0-8047-1721-4 [Edg91]. 0-8047-1722-2 [Edg91]. 0-9672617-3-2 [Bro06, Hug07]. 1 [Opp57f]. 109 [Con05, Mur05, Nas07, Sap05a, Wol05, Kru07]. 112 [FW07]. 1 2 14.99/$25.00 [Ber04a]. 16 [GHK+96]. 1890-1960 [McG02]. 1911 [Meh75]. 1945 [GHK+96, Gow81, Haw61, Bad95, Gol95a, Hew66, She82, HBP94]. 1945-47 [Hew66]. 1950 [Ano50]. 1954 [Ano01b, GM54, SZC54]. 1960s [Sch08a]. 1963 [Kuh63]. 1967 [Bet67a, Bet97, Pun67, RB67]. 1976 [Sag79a, Sag79b]. 1981 [Ano81]. 20 [Goe88]. 2005 [Dre07]. 20th [Opp65a, Anoxx, Kai02].
    [Show full text]
  • Confronting the Experts
    Confronting the experts Brian Martin, editor Published in 1996 by State University of New York Press, Albany This is the August 1995 typescript with minor changes in the text, a different format and page numbering (112 instead of 210 pages) and omission of the index. Contents 1. Introduction: experts and establishments 1 Brian Martin 2. Sewerage treatment and the engineering establishment 8 Sharon Beder 3. Fluoridation: breaking the silence barrier 26 Mark Diesendorf 4. Terrorism: the struggle against closure 45 Edward S. Herman 5. “What price intellectual honesty?” asks a neurobiologist 58 Harold Hillman 6. The Guido Riccio controversy in art history 78 Michael Mallory and Gordon Moran 7. Confronting the nuclear power structure in India 93 Dhirendra Sharma 8. Conclusion: learning from struggle 105 Brian Martin Contributors 110 1 Introduction: experts and establishments Brian Martin Published in Brian Martin (editor), Confronting the Experts (Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1996), pp. 1-12 Today’s complex society is increasingly The most prominent and regular pronuclear dependent on experts — civil engineers, contributor was Sir Ernest Titterton, Professor surgeons, taxation lawyers, computer of Nuclear Physics at the Australian National programmers, economists, and many others. University, whose involvement with and These experts are usually defined by their advocacy of nuclear technology dated from the credentials and their solidarity with main- 1940s. As a local, high-status authority, Sir stream professional bodies. Those who oppose Ernest could easily get his articles and letters them often do not have the same credibility, published. Other prominent pronuclear although they may have the same levels of contributors were Sir Philip Baxter, former knowledge and experience.
    [Show full text]
  • Raising the Bar Sydney 2018 Warwick Holmes – to Infinity and Beyond
    Raising the Bar Sydney 2018 Warwick Holmes – To infinity and beyond Welcome to the podcast series of "Raising the Bar Sydney." Raising the bar in 2018 saw 20 University of Sydney academics take their research out of the lecture theatre and into bars across Sydney, all on one night. In this podcast, you'll hear Warrick Holmes' talk, "To Infinity and beyond." Enjoy the talk. [ Applause ] Okay, ladies and gentlemen, thank you very much indeed for coming this evening to the University of Sydney's "Raising The Bar." The theme of my talk tonight is titled, and I've just forgotten what it is, "To Infinity and Beyond." That's right. Okay. So, tonight I'm going to be presenting to you some themes about space engineering and space science. And the relevance to Australia. And I'm going tp put this in the format of giving you some antidotes about space engineering and some of the history of engineering in Australia. Before I start, I just want to check that you've all got the right drinks, because this a bar. I understand there's some interesting space cocktails here tonight. So, I tonight have a Bailey's Comet with me, you see, Bailey's Comet. There's Pink Galactic Garbo Blasters I believe courtesy of Douglas Adams. And did you know that there was a crater on the moon called beer crater, which I just feel is appropriate somehow for tonight. So, because we're in a bar, I think the general theme I have, I'm going to ask you some questions first of all and then half an hour later you're going to ask me questions, okay.
    [Show full text]
  • Golden Yearbook
    Golden Yearbook Golden Yearbook Stories from graduates of the 1930s to the 1960s Foreword from the Vice-Chancellor and Principal ���������������������������������������������������������5 Message from the Chancellor ��������������������������������7 — Timeline of significant events at the University of Sydney �������������������������������������8 — The 1930s The Great Depression ������������������������������������������ 13 Graduates of the 1930s ���������������������������������������� 14 — The 1940s Australia at war ��������������������������������������������������� 21 Graduates of the 1940s ����������������������������������������22 — The 1950s Populate or perish ���������������������������������������������� 47 Graduates of the 1950s ����������������������������������������48 — The 1960s Activism and protest ������������������������������������������155 Graduates of the 1960s ���������������������������������������156 — What will tomorrow bring? ��������������������������������� 247 The University of Sydney today ���������������������������248 — Index ����������������������������������������������������������������250 Glossary ����������������������������������������������������������� 252 Produced by Marketing and Communications, the University of Sydney, December 2016. Disclaimer: The content of this publication includes edited versions of original contributions by University of Sydney alumni and relevant associated content produced by the University. The views and opinions expressed are those of the alumni contributors and do
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Barriers to Anglo-American Nuclear Cooperation
    3 HISTORIC BARRIERS TO ANGLO- AMERICAN NUCLEAR COOPERATION ANDREW BROWN Despite being the closest of allies, with shared values and language, at- tempts by the United Kingdom and the United States to reach accords on nuclear matters generated distrust and resentment but no durable arrangements until the Mutual Defense Agreement of 1958. There were times when the perceived national interests of the two countries were unsynchronized or at odds; periods when political leaders did not see eye to eye or made secret agreements that remained just that; and when espionage, propaganda, and public opinion caused addi- tional tensions. STATUS IMBALANCE The Magna Carta of the nuclear age is the two-part Frisch-Peierls mem- orandum. It was produced by two European émigrés, Otto Frisch and Rudolf Peierls, at Birmingham University in the spring of 1940. Un- like Einstein’s famous letter to President Franklin D. Roosevelt, with its vague warning that a powerful new bomb might be constructed from uranium, the Frisch-Peierls memorandum set out detailed technical arguments leading to the conclusion that “a moderate amount of U-235 [highly enriched uranium] would indeed constitute an extremely effi- cient explosive.” Like Einstein, Frisch and Peierls were worried that the Germans might already be working toward an atomic bomb against which there would be no defense. By suggesting “a counter-threat with a similar bomb,” they first enunciated the concept of mutual deterrence and recommended “start[ing] production as soon as possible, even if 36 Historic Barriers to Anglo-American Nuclear Cooperation 37 it is not intended to use the bomb as a means of attack.”1 Professor Mark Oliphant from Birmingham convinced the UK authorities that “the whole thing must be taken rather seriously,”2 and a small group of senior scientists came together as the Maud Committee.
    [Show full text]
  • Character List
    Character List - Bomb ​ Use this chart to help you keep track of the hundreds of names of physicists, freedom fighters, government officials, and others involved in the making of the atomic bomb. Scientists Political/Military Leaders Spies Robert Oppenheimer - Winston Churchill -- Prime Klaus Fuchs - physicist in ​ ​ ​ designed atomic bomb. He was Minister of England Manhattan Project who gave accused of spying. secrets to Russia Franklin D. Roosevelt -- ​ Albert Einstein - convinced President of the United States Harry Gold - spy and Courier ​ ​ U.S. government that they for Russia KGB. Narrator of the needed to research fission. Harry Truman -- President of story ​ the United States Enrico Fermi - created first Ruth Werner - Russian spy ​ ​ chain reaction Joseph Stalin -- dictator of the ​ Tell Hall -- physicist in Soviet Union ​ Igor Korchatov -- Russian Manhattan Project who gave ​ physicist in charge of designing Adolf Hitler -- dictator of secrets to Russia ​ bomb Germany Haakon Chevalier - friend who ​ Werner Reisenberg -- Leslie Groves -- Military approached Oppenheimer about ​ ​ German physicist in charge of leader of the Manhattan Project spying for Russia. He was designing bomb watched by the FBI, but he was not charged. Otto Hahn -- German physicist ​ who discovered fission Other scientists involved in the Manhattan Project: ​ Aage Niels Bohr George Kistiakowsky Joseph W. Kennedy Richard Feynman Arthur C. Wahl Frank Oppenheimer Joseph Rotblat Robert Bacher Arthur H. Compton Hans Bethe Karl T. Compton Robert Serber Charles Critchfield Harold Agnew Kenneth Bainbridge Robert Wilson Charles Thomas Harold Urey Leo James Rainwater Rudolf Pelerls Crawford Greenewalt Harold DeWolf Smyth Leo Szilard Samuel K. Allison Cyril S. Smith Herbert L. Anderson Luis Alvarez Samuel Goudsmit Edward Norris Isidor I.
    [Show full text]
  • UNSW D14 College Walk, Kensington Statement of Heritage Impact
    UNSW D14 College Walk, Kensington Statement of Heritage Impact UNSW owner and applicant Lendlease D&C partner Prepared for UNSW April 2019 • Issue E Project number 18 0724 Tanner Kibble Denton Architects Pty Ltd | ABN 77 001 209 392 | www.tkda.com.au Sydney Level 1, 19 Foster Street, Surry Hills NSW 2010 Australia | T+61 2 9281 4399 Brisbane Level 14, 241 Adelaide Street, Brisbane QLD 4000 Australia | T+61 7 3087 0160 Principals Alex Kibble, Robert Denton, Megan Jones, John Rose | Practice Directors George Phillips, Jocelyn Jackson, Melanie Mackenzie Senior Associates Ian Burgher, Angelo Casado, David Earp, Anna Harris, Emma Lee, Scott MacArthur, Renata Ratcliffe, Lachlan Rowe Associates Asta Chow, Paul Dyson, Sean Williams NSW Nominated Architects Robert Denton Registration No 5782 | Alex Kibble Registration No 6015 UNSW D14 • Statement of Heritage Impact TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Background and purpose of the report 1 1.2 Response to Submissions 1 1.3 Methodology and terminology 1 1.4 Author identification 2 1.5 Site location and description 2 1.6 Documentation 3 1.7 Heritage management context 4 2 Historical Background 5 2.1 Kensington Racecourse 5 3 Heritage Significance 15 3.1 Statement of significance 15 4 Description of the Proposal 16 5 Assessment of Heritage Impact 18 5.1 Design Considerations 18 5.2 NSW Heritage Office Model Questions 22 5.3 Randwick Local Environmental Plan 2012 26 5.4 Response to submission from Randwick City Council 28 6 Conclusions 30 APPENDIX A Photographs of existing site A-1 Document / Status
    [Show full text]
  • Maverick Mathematician And, As He Put It, ‘Moyal’S More General Knowledge of European Work in the Theory of Stochastic Processes Was a Considerable Stimulus to Me’
    Chapter 4. The Widening Circle With the war's end, Joe Moyal was poised to enter another life. His reputation at De Havilland's had continued to rise and he was offered the job of developing a guidance system for the `Black Knight' missile which would combine a mixture of the electronic and electrical engineering which, as he put it, he had `exploited during the war'. But he had had enough of the technology of warfare. `I was sick of war and research on war', he reflected later, and he was anxious to make revisions and headway on his quantum paper and extend his research in mathematics, physics and statistics. His intellectual circle, moreover, was widening and moving him into congenial fields. His wartime contacts included his supportive Cambridge contacts, Maurice Bartlett and Dr. Harold Jeffries and, via Professor Fowler, other members of the Department of Mathematics. Figure 4.1. Maurice Bartlett, statistician – a valuable ally and colleague of Joe’s J. Gani Private collection. Maurice Bartlett was destined to become one of Britain's major statisticians. A scholarship boy at Queen's College, Cambridge, he had taken his first degree in mathematics, soaked up courses on statistical 45 mechanics with Ralph Fowler and statistical sources with Colin Clark, studied quantum mechanics with Paul Dirac, and launched into early research in mathematical statistics in his fourth year, publishing his first papers as a student. Graduating in 1933, he became an assistant lecturer in the new Statistics Department at University College, London, where he worked (among others) with the new Galton Professor, R.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Iss-Archives.Pdf
    Contents Introduction: The International Science School ............................................................................... 3 Our Story ............................................................................................................................................... 4 ISS2017: Future Power ....................................................................................................................... 6 ISS2015: BIG ........................................................................................................................................ 8 ISS2013: NANOSCIENCE ................................................................................................................ 11 ISS 2011: Light & Matter ................................................................................................................... 14 ISS2009: Genes to Galaxies ............................................................................................................ 17 ISS2007: ecoscience ......................................................................................................................... 20 ISS2005: Waves of the Future ......................................................................................................... 23 ISS2003: Impact Science .................................................................................................................. 26 ISS2001: Impact Science .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]