DOCSLIB.ORG

Proceedings of the Sir Mark Oliphant International Frontiers of Science and Technology Australian Geothermal Energy Conference Record 2008/18 Gurgenci, H

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

GEOSCIENCE AUSTRALIA Sir Mark Oliphant Conferences – International Frontiers of Science and Technology Proceedings of the Sir Mark Oliphant International Frontiers of Science and Technology Australian Geothermal Energy Conference Record 2008/18 Gurgenci, H. and Budd, A.R. APPLYING GEOSCIENCE TO AUSTRALIA’S MOST IMPORTANT CHALLENGES Proceedings of the Sir Mark Oliphant International Frontiers of Science and Technology Australian Geothermal Energy Conference GEOSCIENCE AUSTRALIA RECORD 2008/18 Edited by Hal Gurgenci 1 and Anthony Budd 2 1 Queensland Geothermal Energy Centre, The University of Queensland, St Lucia 4072 2 Geoscience Australia, GPO Box 378, Canberra, ACT 2601 Department of Resources, Energy and Tourism Minister for Resources and Energy: The Hon. Martin Ferguson, AM MP Secretary: Dr Peter Boxall Geoscience Australia Chief Executive Officer: Dr Neil Williams PSM © Commonwealth of Australia, 2008 This work is copyright. Apart from any fair dealings for the purpose of study, research, criticism, or review, as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission. Copyright is the responsibility of the Chief Executive Officer, Geoscience Australia. Requests and enquiries should be directed to the Chief Executive Officer, Geoscience Australia, GPO Box 378 Canberra ACT 2601. Geoscience Australia has tried to make the information in this product as accurate as possible. However, it does not guarantee that the information is totally accurate or complete. Therefore, you should not solely rely on this information when making a commercial decision. ISSN 1448-2177 ISBN 978 1 921498 19 0 GeoCat # 67255 Recommended bibliographic reference: Gurgenci, H. and Budd, A.R. (editors), 2008. Proceedings of the Sir Mark Oliphant International Frontiers of Science and Technology Australian Geothermal Energy Conference, Geoscience Australia, Record 2008/18, 215 pp. Recommended bibliographic citation: Alehossein, H. and Hooman, K. 2008. Coupled Thermomechanical Boundary Element Modelling (BEM), in: Gurgenci and Budd (editors), Proceedings of the Sir Mark Oliphant International Frontiers of Science and Technology Australian Geothermal Energy Conference, Geoscience Australia, Record 2008/18, 23-27. Cover illustration: 3D image of gravity inversion modelling in southern Cooper Basin region of South Australia, viewed obliquely from the west. The maroon bodies enclose regions of low density interpreted as granites located at depth beneath Cooper Basin sediments. The interpreted granites are shown projected above an image of the Bouguer Gravity field, from which the inversion model was generated. Courtesy of Tony Meixner, Geoscience Australia. Australian Geothermal Energy Conference 2008 The Convenors would like to thank the following sponsors for their kind support: Gold Sponsors Silver Sponsors Bronze Sponsors Student Supporter Thursday Happy Hour Sponsor Australian Geothermal Energy Conference 2008 Introduction This volume is a compilation of Extended Abstracts presented at the 2008 Australian Geothermal Energy Conference, 19-22 August 2008, Rydges Hotel, Melbourne, organised by the Australian Geothermal Energy Association and the Australian Geothermal Energy Group. This Conference is the first dedicated conference organised by the geothermal energy community in Australia and has been made possible by seed funding from the Australian Government under the Sir Mark Oliphant International Frontiers of Science and Technology Conference funding scheme with additional sponsorship of the companies acknowledged earlier and paying delegates. This Conference is being held at a time of rapid growth in all sectors of the geothermal community. The number of companies engaged in exploration stands at 33, the number of leases held or applied for is 320, and the value of the work program for these companies exceeds $850 million between 2002-2013. The Australian Geothermal Energy Association has been incorporated to serve as the peak industry representative body. The Universities of Queensland, West Australia, Adelaide and Newcastle have new funding specifically for geothermal research programs. The Australian Government has continued its strong support of the sector through the Geothermal Industry Development Framework and Technology Roadmap, the Geothermal Drilling Program, and the Onshore Energy Security Program. All of the States now have legislation regulating geothermal exploration activity in place, and the Northern Territory has drafted legislation for presentation to parliament. This volume of Extended Abstracts starts with a summary snapshot of the global and national geothermal energy sectors. The rest of the volume is organised under three headings: • Underground Science and Technology • Power Conversion Technologies • Legislation, Policy and Infrastructure As editors of these proceedings, we first would like to thank the Technical Committee who have been very generous with their time to review the submissions and to work with the authors of the accepted submissions to improve the quality of the Abstracts and the presentations. We also thank the Conference Chair Alan Knights and the rest of the Organising Committee who were brave enough to take on the job organising this inaugural event on behalf of the Australian Geothermal Energy Association and the Australian Geothermal Energy Group. Jem Hansen and Impact Environment Conferences have done an excellent job in assisting the organisation. We also thank again the sponsoring companies for their generous support. We thank Geoscience Australia for printing the proceedings. Finally, we thank all delegates without whose participation none of this is worthwhile. Anthony Budd Hal Gurgenci i Australian Geothermal Energy Conference 2008 CONFERENCE ORGANISING COMMITTEE Alan Knights (Chair), Green Rock Energy Ltd Dr Graeme Beardsmore, Hot Dry Rocks Pty Ltd Dr Anthony Budd, Geoscience Australia Emma Cordon, Hot Dry Rocks Pty Ltd Jim Driscoll, Hot Dry Rocks Pty Ltd Damia Ettakadoumi, Victorian Department of Primary Industries Professor Hal Gurgenci, Queensland Geothermal Energy Centre of Excellence Tony Hill, Primary Industries and Resources South Australia Dr Fiona Holgate, Geoscience Australia Susan Jeanes, Australian Geothermal Energy Association PROGRAM TECHNICAL PANEL Professor Hal Gurgenci (Chair), Queensland Geothermal Energy Centre of Excellence Dr Graeme Beardsmore, Hot Dry Rocks Pty Ltd Dr Anthony Budd, Geoscience Australia Dr Prame Chopra, Geodynamics Limited and Earthinsite.com Pty Ltd Professor Richard Hillis, Australian School of Petroleum Dr Fiona Holgate, Geoscience Australia Chris Matthews, Torrens Energy Limited Professor Behdad Moghtaderi, The University of Newcastle Professor Graham (Gus) Nathan, The University of Adelaide Professor Klaus Regenauer-Lieb, The University of Western Australia Peter Reid, Petratherm Ltd Professor Victor Rudolph, The University of Queensland Dr Adrian Williams, Geodynamics Ltd Dr Doone Wyborn, Geodynamics Ltd CONFERENCE ORGANISERS Jem Hansen & Dawn Hallinan, Impact Environmental Conferences ii Australian Geothermal Energy Conference 2008 Contents Introduction ............................................... i National Outlook Budd, A.R., Holgate, F.L., Gerner, E., Ayling, B.F. and Barnicoat, A. Pre-competitive Geoscience for Geothermal Exploration and Development in Australia: Geoscience Australia’s Onshore Energy Security Program and the Geothermal Energy Project ..........1 Goldstein, B.A., Hill, A.J., Budd, A.R., Holgate, F.L., and Malavazos, M. The National Outlook - Australia’s Hot Rocks ............................ 9 Tester, J.W. The Future of Geothermal Energy as a Major Global Energy Supplier ................19 Underground Science and Technology Alehossein, H. and Hooman, K. Coupled Thermomechanical Boundary Element Modelling (BEM) .................23 Asanuma, H., Kumano, Y., Niitsuma, H., Wyborn, D., Schanz, U. and Haring, M. Current Status of Microseismic Monitoring Techniques for the Stimulation of HDR/HFR Reservoirs ............................................... 29 Baria, R., Petty, S. and Beardsmore, G.R. Economic and Technical Cases for the Commercial Exploitation of Engineered Geothermal Systems . 37 Beardsmore, G. R. Hot Rock Exploration Methods .................................... 39 Cibich, W., Malavazos, M., and McDonough, R. A Steady-State Pressure Model for Water Flow in a Hydraulically Fractured Geothermal Reservoir. 43 de Graaf, B. and Gunter, J. The Limestone Coast Project – a unique geothermal project targeting ‘blind’ geothermal resources. 51 Ghori, K.A.R. Perth Basin’s Geothermal Resources ................................. 55 Gibson, H., Stüwe, K., Seikel, R., FitzGerald, D., Calcagno, P., Guillen, A. and McInerney, P. Forward Prediction of Temperature Distribution Direct From 3D Geology Models ........63 Gordon, K. The Thermal Structure of Continental Lithosphere: a Review ....................71 Häring, M.O., Ladner, F. and Schanz, U. Lessons Learnt from the Deep Heat Mining EGS Project in Basel, Switzerland ...........77 Hidalgo R. and Ungemach P. Madrid Basin District Heating Potential ................................ 79 Hillis, R.R. In-Situ Stress in Australia and Subsurface Fluid Flow ......................... 81 Horowitz, F.G., Regenauer-Lieb, K., Wellmann, J.F., Chua, H.T., Wang, X. and Poulet, T. Evidence for Hydrothermal Convection in the Perth Basin, Australia ................85 iii Australian Geothermal Energy Conference 2008 Larking, A. Hydraulic Fracturing at the
Recommended publications
  • Algeria Upstream OG Report.Pub

    Algeria Upstream OG Report.Pub

    ALGERIA UPSTREAM OIL & GAS REPORT Completed by: M. Smith, Sr. Commercial Officer, K. Achab, Sr. Commercial Specialist, and B. Olinger, Research Assistant Introduction Regulatory Environment Current Market Trends Technical Barriers to Trade and More Competitive Landscape Upcoming Events Best Prospects for U.S. Exporters Industry Resources Introduction Oil and gas have long been the backbone of the Algerian economy thanks to its vast oil and gas reserves, favorable geology, and new opportunities for both conventional and unconventional discovery/production. Unfortunately, the collapse in oil prices beginning in 2014 and the transition to spot market pricing for natural gas over the last three years revealed the weaknesses of this economic model. Because Algeria has not meaningfully diversified its economy since 2014, oil and gas production is even more essential than ever before to the government’s revenue base and political stability. Today’s conjoined global health and economic crises, coupled with persistent declining production levels, have therefore placed Algeria’s oil and gas industry, and the country, at a critical juncture where it requires ample foreign investment and effective technology transfer. One path to the future includes undertaking new oil and gas projects in partnership with international companies (large and small) to revitalize production. The other path, marked by inertia and institutional resistance to change, leads to oil and gas production levels in ten years that will be half of today's production levels. After two decades of autocracy, Algeria’s recent passage of a New Hydrocarbons Law seems to indicate that the country may choose the path of partnership by profoundly changing its tax and investment laws in the hydrocarbons sector to re-attract international oil companies.
  • Rutherford's Nuclear World: the Story of the Discovery of the Nuc

    Rutherford's Nuclear World: the Story of the Discovery of the Nuc

    Rutherford's Nuclear World: The Story of the Discovery of the Nuc... http://www.aip.org/history/exhibits/rutherford/sections/atop-physic... HOME SECTIONS CREDITS EXHIBIT HALL ABOUT US rutherford's explore the atom learn more more history of learn about aip's nuclear world with rutherford about this site physics exhibits history programs Atop the Physics Wave ShareShareShareShareShareMore 9 RUTHERFORD BACK IN CAMBRIDGE, 1919–1937 Sections ← Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next → In 1962, John Cockcroft (1897–1967) reflected back on the “Miraculous Year” ( Annus mirabilis ) of 1932 in the Cavendish Laboratory: “One month it was the neutron, another month the transmutation of the light elements; in another the creation of radiation of matter in the form of pairs of positive and negative electrons was made visible to us by Professor Blackett's cloud chamber, with its tracks curled some to the left and some to the right by powerful magnetic fields.” Rutherford reigned over the Cavendish Lab from 1919 until his death in 1937. The Cavendish Lab in the 1920s and 30s is often cited as the beginning of modern “big science.” Dozens of researchers worked in teams on interrelated problems. Yet much of the work there used simple, inexpensive devices — the sort of thing Rutherford is famous for. And the lab had many competitors: in Paris, Berlin, and even in the U.S. Rutherford became Cavendish Professor and director of the Cavendish Laboratory in 1919, following the It is tempting to simplify a complicated story. Rutherford directed the Cavendish Lab footsteps of J.J. Thomson. Rutherford died in 1937, having led a first wave of discovery of the atom.
  • The Development of Military Nuclear Strategy And

    The Development of Military Nuclear Strategy And

    The Development of Military Nuclear Strategy and Anglo-American Relations, 1939 – 1958 Submitted by: Geoffrey Charles Mallett Skinner to the University of Exeter as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History, July 2018 This thesis is available for Library use on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. I certify that all material in this thesis which is not my own work has been identified and that no material has previously been submitted and approved for the award of a degree by this or any other University. (Signature) ……………………………………………………………………………… 1 Abstract There was no special governmental partnership between Britain and America during the Second World War in atomic affairs. A recalibration is required that updates and amends the existing historiography in this respect. The wartime atomic relations of those countries were cooperative at the level of science and resources, but rarely that of the state. As soon as it became apparent that fission weaponry would be the main basis of future military power, America decided to gain exclusive control over the weapon. Britain could not replicate American resources and no assistance was offered to it by its conventional ally. America then created its own, closed, nuclear system and well before the 1946 Atomic Energy Act, the event which is typically seen by historians as the explanation of the fracturing of wartime atomic relations. Immediately after 1945 there was insufficient systemic force to create change in the consistent American policy of atomic monopoly. As fusion bombs introduced a new magnitude of risk, and as the nuclear world expanded and deepened, the systemic pressures grew.
  • A Selected Bibliography of Publications By, and About, J

    A Selected Bibliography of Publications By, and About, J

    A Selected Bibliography of Publications by, and about, J. Robert Oppenheimer Nelson H. F. Beebe University of Utah Department of Mathematics, 110 LCB 155 S 1400 E RM 233 Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0090 USA Tel: +1 801 581 5254 FAX: +1 801 581 4148 E-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] (Internet) WWW URL: http://www.math.utah.edu/~beebe/ 17 March 2021 Version 1.47 Title word cross-reference $1 [Duf46]. $12.95 [Edg91]. $13.50 [Tho03]. $14.00 [Hug07]. $15.95 [Hen81]. $16.00 [RS06]. $16.95 [RS06]. $17.50 [Hen81]. $2.50 [Opp28g]. $20.00 [Hen81, Jor80]. $24.95 [Fra01]. $25.00 [Ger06]. $26.95 [Wol05]. $27.95 [Ger06]. $29.95 [Goo09]. $30.00 [Kev03, Kle07]. $32.50 [Edg91]. $35 [Wol05]. $35.00 [Bed06]. $37.50 [Hug09, Pol07, Dys13]. $39.50 [Edg91]. $39.95 [Bad95]. $8.95 [Edg91]. α [Opp27a, Rut27]. γ [LO34]. -particles [Opp27a]. -rays [Rut27]. -Teilchen [Opp27a]. 0-226-79845-3 [Guy07, Hug09]. 0-8014-8661-0 [Tho03]. 0-8047-1713-3 [Edg91]. 0-8047-1714-1 [Edg91]. 0-8047-1721-4 [Edg91]. 0-8047-1722-2 [Edg91]. 0-9672617-3-2 [Bro06, Hug07]. 1 [Opp57f]. 109 [Con05, Mur05, Nas07, Sap05a, Wol05, Kru07]. 112 [FW07]. 1 2 14.99/$25.00 [Ber04a]. 16 [GHK+96]. 1890-1960 [McG02]. 1911 [Meh75]. 1945 [GHK+96, Gow81, Haw61, Bad95, Gol95a, Hew66, She82, HBP94]. 1945-47 [Hew66]. 1950 [Ano50]. 1954 [Ano01b, GM54, SZC54]. 1960s [Sch08a]. 1963 [Kuh63]. 1967 [Bet67a, Bet97, Pun67, RB67]. 1976 [Sag79a, Sag79b]. 1981 [Ano81]. 20 [Goe88]. 2005 [Dre07]. 20th [Opp65a, Anoxx, Kai02].
  • Status of Technology for Deep Borehole Disposal

    Status of Technology for Deep Borehole Disposal

    STATUS OF TECHNOLOGY FOR DEEP BOREHOLE DISPOSAL John Beswick EPS International Contract No NP 01185 April 2008 EPS International Contract No NP 01185 April 2008 Preface This report has been prepared by EPS International for the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA). However, the views expressed and the conclusions reached are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of the NDA. Conditions of publication This report is made available under the NDA Transparency Policy. In line with this policy, the NDA is seeking to make information on its activities readily available, and to enable interested parties to have access to and influence on its future programmes. The report may be freely used for non-commercial purposes. However, all commercial uses, including copying and re-publication, require permission from the NDA. All copyright, database rights and other intellectual property rights reside with the NDA. Applications for permission to use the report commercially should be made to the NDA Information Manager. Although great care has been taken to ensure the accuracy and completeness of the information contained in this publication, the NDA can not assume any responsibility for consequences that may arise from its use by other parties. © Nuclear Decommissioning Authority 2008. All rights reserved. Bibliography If you would like to see other reports available from NDA, a complete listing can be viewed at our website www.nda.gov.uk, or please write to the Library at the address below. Feedback Readers are invited to provide feedback to the NDA on the contents, clarity and presentation of this report and on the means of improving the range of NDA reports published.
  • Historic Barriers to Anglo-American Nuclear Cooperation

    Historic Barriers to Anglo-American Nuclear Cooperation

    3 HISTORIC BARRIERS TO ANGLO- AMERICAN NUCLEAR COOPERATION ANDREW BROWN Despite being the closest of allies, with shared values and language, at- tempts by the United Kingdom and the United States to reach accords on nuclear matters generated distrust and resentment but no durable arrangements until the Mutual Defense Agreement of 1958. There were times when the perceived national interests of the two countries were unsynchronized or at odds; periods when political leaders did not see eye to eye or made secret agreements that remained just that; and when espionage, propaganda, and public opinion caused addi- tional tensions. STATUS IMBALANCE The Magna Carta of the nuclear age is the two-part Frisch-Peierls mem- orandum. It was produced by two European émigrés, Otto Frisch and Rudolf Peierls, at Birmingham University in the spring of 1940. Un- like Einstein’s famous letter to President Franklin D. Roosevelt, with its vague warning that a powerful new bomb might be constructed from uranium, the Frisch-Peierls memorandum set out detailed technical arguments leading to the conclusion that “a moderate amount of U-235 [highly enriched uranium] would indeed constitute an extremely effi- cient explosive.” Like Einstein, Frisch and Peierls were worried that the Germans might already be working toward an atomic bomb against which there would be no defense. By suggesting “a counter-threat with a similar bomb,” they first enunciated the concept of mutual deterrence and recommended “start[ing] production as soon as possible, even if 36 Historic Barriers to Anglo-American Nuclear Cooperation 37 it is not intended to use the bomb as a means of attack.”1 Professor Mark Oliphant from Birmingham convinced the UK authorities that “the whole thing must be taken rather seriously,”2 and a small group of senior scientists came together as the Maud Committee.
  • On the Dynamic Effects During Under-Balanced Drilling Operations

    On the Dynamic Effects During Under-Balanced Drilling Operations

    ON THE DYNAMIC EFFECTS DURING UNDERBALANCED DRILLING OPERATIONS AND THEIR PREVENTION Z. Wang, R. Rommetveit, RF-Rogaland Research; R. Maglione, Agip; A. Bijleveld, KSEPL, Shell; D. Gazaniol, Elf Aquitaine Production RF-- *\~IJois rbceiveo SEP 29 938 OSTt DISCLAIMER Portions of this document may be illegible electronic image products. Images are produced from the best available original document. ABSTRACTS In most underbalanced drilling (UBD) operations, the underbalanced condition must be generated artificially by injecting gas into the well. Due to the high compressibility nature of gaseous phase and interruptions to the system, the flowing system is a non-steady state one, especially when jointed pipes are used. This is experienced by the varying liquid and gas flow-out rates, and spikes in the bottomhole pressure. These dynamic pressures have been observed and documented in field UBD operations. This paper will first present an extensive examination of the dynamic effects during an underbalanced operation. The dynamic effects are often associated with drilling operations, like starting/stopping circulation, gas injection kick-in, changing fluids circulation rates, making connections, tripping, and deployment of BHA and downhole tools. Secondly, we discuss measures that are necessary to avoid the excessive peak loading of the surface facilities, the excessive wellhead pressures, and accidental overbalanced situations downhole. These are developed based on the field experience and simulation results from a dynamic underbalanced drilling simulator. We also demonstrate how a dynamic underbalanced drilling simulator can be used to improve the understanding of the physical process involved and be useful in designing operations. 1 - INTRODUCTION Underbalanced drilling has been used increasingly to address many field and operational problems during the last several years.
  • Underbalanced Drilling: Can It Solve the Economic, Environmental and Regulatory Taking Problems Associated with Fracking? 49 J

    Underbalanced Drilling: Can It Solve the Economic, Environmental and Regulatory Taking Problems Associated with Fracking? 49 J

    UIC Law Review Volume 49 Issue 2 Article 7 Spring 2015 Underbalanced Drilling: Can it Solve the Economic, Environmental and Regulatory Taking Problems Associated with Fracking? 49 J. Marshall L. Rev. 511 (2015) Richard Roddewig W. James Hughes Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.uic.edu/lawreview Part of the Energy and Utilities Law Commons, Environmental Law Commons, and the Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law Commons Recommended Citation Richard J. Roddewig & W. James Hughes, Underbalanced Drilling: Can it Solve the Economic, Environmental and Regulatory Taking Problems Associated with Fracking? 49 J. Marshall L. Rev. 511 (2015) https://repository.law.uic.edu/lawreview/vol49/iss2/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by UIC Law Open Access Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in UIC Law Review by an authorized administrator of UIC Law Open Access Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. UNDERBALANCED DRILLING: CAN IT SOLVE THE ECONOMIC, ENVIRONMENTAL AND REGULATORY TAKING PROBLEMS ASSOCIATED WITH FRACKING? RICHARD J. RODDEWIG, JD, MAI, CRE, FRICS & W. JAMES HUGHES* I. INTRODUCTION: HYDRAULIC FRACTURING AT THE CROSSROADS – THE CURRENT INTERPLAY OF ECONOMIC, ENVIRONMENTAL AND REGULATORY ISSUES CONFRONTING THE US OIL AND GAS INDUSTRY....................................511 A. Opposition to Fracking: Types and Causes of Concern .............................................................................525 B. The Industry and Regulatory Response to Fracking Opposition:
  • Character List

    Character List

    Character List - Bomb ​ Use this chart to help you keep track of the hundreds of names of physicists, freedom fighters, government officials, and others involved in the making of the atomic bomb. Scientists Political/Military Leaders Spies Robert Oppenheimer - Winston Churchill -- Prime Klaus Fuchs - physicist in ​ ​ ​ designed atomic bomb. He was Minister of England Manhattan Project who gave accused of spying. secrets to Russia Franklin D. Roosevelt -- ​ Albert Einstein - convinced President of the United States Harry Gold - spy and Courier ​ ​ U.S. government that they for Russia KGB. Narrator of the needed to research fission. Harry Truman -- President of story ​ the United States Enrico Fermi - created first Ruth Werner - Russian spy ​ ​ chain reaction Joseph Stalin -- dictator of the ​ Tell Hall -- physicist in Soviet Union ​ Igor Korchatov -- Russian Manhattan Project who gave ​ physicist in charge of designing Adolf Hitler -- dictator of secrets to Russia ​ bomb Germany Haakon Chevalier - friend who ​ Werner Reisenberg -- Leslie Groves -- Military approached Oppenheimer about ​ ​ German physicist in charge of leader of the Manhattan Project spying for Russia. He was designing bomb watched by the FBI, but he was not charged. Otto Hahn -- German physicist ​ who discovered fission Other scientists involved in the Manhattan Project: ​ Aage Niels Bohr George Kistiakowsky Joseph W. Kennedy Richard Feynman Arthur C. Wahl Frank Oppenheimer Joseph Rotblat Robert Bacher Arthur H. Compton Hans Bethe Karl T. Compton Robert Serber Charles Critchfield Harold Agnew Kenneth Bainbridge Robert Wilson Charles Thomas Harold Urey Leo James Rainwater Rudolf Pelerls Crawford Greenewalt Harold DeWolf Smyth Leo Szilard Samuel K. Allison Cyril S. Smith Herbert L. Anderson Luis Alvarez Samuel Goudsmit Edward Norris Isidor I.
  • Companies Involved in Oilfield Services from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia

    Companies Involved in Oilfield Services from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia

    Companies Involved in Oilfield Services From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Diversified Oilfield Services Companies These companies deal in a wide range of oilfield services, allowing them access to markets ranging from seismic imaging to deep water oil exploration. Schlumberger Halliburton Baker Weatherford International Oilfield Equipment Companies These companies build rigs and supply hardware for rig upgrades and oilfield operations. Yantai Jereh Petroleum Equipment&Technologies Co., Ltd. National-Oilwell Varco FMC Technologies Cameron Corporation Weir SPM Oil & Gas Zhongman Petroleum & Natural Gas Corpration LappinTech LLC Dresser-Rand Group Inc. Oilfield Services Disposal Companies These companies provide saltwater disposal and transportation services for Oil & Gas.. Frontier Oilfield Services Inc. (FOSI) Oil Exploration and Production Services Contractors These companies deal in seismic imaging technology for oil and gas exploration. ION Geophysical Corporation CGG Veritas Brigham Exploration Company OYO Geospace These firms contract drilling rigs to oil and gas companies for both exploration and production. Transocean Diamond Offshore Drilling Noble Hercules Offshore Parker Drilling Company Pride International ENSCO International Atwood Oceanics Union Drilling Nabors Industries Grey Wolf Pioneer Drilling Co Patterson-UTI Energy Helmerich & Payne Rowan Companies Oil and Gas Pipeline Companies These companies build onshore pipelines to transport oil and gas between cities, states, and countries.
  • 2014 IADC Well Control Europe Conference & Exhibition

    2014 IADC Well Control Europe Conference & Exhibition

    2014 IADC Well Control Europe CONFERENCE & EXHIBITION 2-3 December 2014 Aberdeen Exhibition & Conference Center Aberdeen, United Kingdom The 2014 IADC Well Control Conference Europe will seek to examine the innovations that are Call For Abstracts shaping the future of well control, from technology to personnel competencies. This event will focus on timely technical presentations highlighting recent developments and innovations in technology, techniques, training, management systems, and a wide variety of other topics that affect well control. Presentations that pose provocative questions and prompt discussion are especially welcome. Presentations on the following topics are welcomed: • Case Histories • Oil Versus Gas Well Control • Emergency Preparedness • Deepwater and Ultra Deepwater Well Control • Well Design and Construction • Surface BOP Operations • Management Systems • Shallow Gas • Standard Operating Procedures • Diagnostic Logging Operations • Remote Monitoring • Underbalanced Operations and Managed • Training and Human Factors Pressure Drilling • Well Control Competencies • ERD/Directional Drilling, Multi-Laterals and Coal • Automated Well Control Seam Development • Regulatory Issues • Unconventional Situations, Casing Drilling, Monobores, etc. Authors are invited to submit proposals for presentations at the conference. For consideration, an abstract for each proposed paper must be submitted to IADC no later than 1st of May 2014. Authors of papers selected will receive confirmation letters and guidelines by begin June 2014. Please note that formal papers are encouraged, but are NOT required for this conference. Authors of selected presentations may be asked to participate in panel sessions, rather than regular technical sessions. Prior to paper proposal submission, management clearance must be obtained. Any issues concerning clearance should be outlined when the paper proposal is submitted.
  • Managed Pressure Drilling & Underbalanced Operations

    Managed Pressure Drilling & Underbalanced Operations

    8-9 April 2014 • Hotel NH eurobuildiNg • MAdrid 2014 SPE/IADC Managed Pressure Drilling & Underbalanced Operations CONFERENCE & EXHIBITION www.pruitt.com TUESDAY, 8 APRIL 2014 12.00 Luncheon & Open Exhibition 07.00 Conference Registration, Coffee 13.30 MPD – Made Simple through Service & Open Exhibition Technology Madrid IV & Benelux Room Session Chair: John Kozicz, Technology Manager, Transocean 08.30 Welcome Opening & Introduction Simplicity of New System Opens Doors for Wide Use of MPD Helio Santos, President, Paul Sonnemann, Erdem Catak, Thomas Barbato, Safe- Madrid I-III Kick; Emmanuel Franco, Guilherme Vanni, Petrobras The simplicity of this new MPD system opens up the possibility of MPD being 09.00 Panel Session: On Your Mark, Get used on many more wells than with current MPD systems, as the rig crew will be Set, Train! able to do the many of the required tasks, with the user-friendly and straight- Moderator: Dan Munoz, Chairman, IADC Well Control forward approach of the system, reducing the number of people needed to run Committee; Director Special Projects (QHSE), Transocean an MPD job. In general, drilling rigs have remained unchanged for decades. With the Fit-for-Purpose Modeling for Automation of Underbalanced Drilling Operations Ulf Jakob Flø Aarsnes, PhD Student, Department of Engi- new technology today, crews from 20 years ago would struggle to adapt to neering Cybernetics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology; these changes. Automation controls are being utilized in place of the tra- Florent Di Melgio, MINES ParisTech; Ole Morten Aamoe, NTNU; Glenn Ole ditional manual controls, new methods of drilling are being advanced and Kaasa, Statoil AS (SPE/IADC 168955) the industry must hire, train and drive employees toward competency in a timely fashion, while minimizing costs and maximizing productivity.