DOCSLIB.ORG

Habitat Survey.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Habitat Survey.Pdf Extended Phase 1 Habitat Survey Proposed Metal Recycling Facility, New Hythe, Kent On Behalf of Aylesford Metals Company Date: August 2011 Our Ref: JER5206 RPS Conrad House Beaufort Square Chepstow Monmouthshire NP16 5EP Tel: (0)1291 621 821 Fax: (0)1291 627 827 Email: [email protected] This document is Printed on FSC certified, 100% post-consumer recycled paper, bleached using an elemental chlorine- free process. JER5206 Proposed Metal Recycling Facility, New Hythe, Kent Planning & Development August 2011 Extended Phase 1 Habitat Survey Quality Management Prepared by: Rebecca Geden Tim Oliver Authorised by: August 2011 Date: JER5206 Project Number: JER5206 R 110823 RG AMC Aylesford Phase 1 Document Reference: O:\JER5206 - AMC Aylesford Revised Phase I\Reports\Phase 1 Habitats Document File Path: Survey - revision\JER5206 R 110823 RG AMC Aylesford Phase 1.doc COPYRIGHT © RPS The material presented in this report is confidential. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Aylesford Metals Company and shall not be distributed or made available to any other company or person without the knowledge and written consent of Aylesford Metals Company or RPS. JER5206 Proposed Metal Recycling Facility, New Hythe, Kent Planning & Development i August 2011 Extended Phase 1 Habitat Survey Contents Quality Management ..................................................................................................i Contents.....................................................................................................................ii 1 Introduction.........................................................................................................1 1.1 Scope of Works ....................................................................................................1 1.2 Site Description ....................................................................................................1 2 Methodology .......................................................................................................2 2.2 Desk Study............................................................................................................2 2.3 Field Survey ..........................................................................................................3 3 Results.................................................................................................................5 3.1 Desk Study............................................................................................................5 3.2 Field Survey ..........................................................................................................9 4 Discussion.........................................................................................................15 4.1 Designated Sites ................................................................................................15 4.2 Habitats and Flora ..............................................................................................15 4.3 Fauna...................................................................................................................16 5 Conclusion ........................................................................................................19 6 Recommendations............................................................................................20 6.1 Designated Sites ................................................................................................20 6.2 Protected Species ..............................................................................................20 JER5206 Proposed Metal Recycling Facility, New Hythe, Kent Planning & Development ii August 2011 Extended Phase 1 Habitat Survey Tables Tables Table 3-1 Statutory Designated Sites within 10km (International Sites) and 2km (National Sites) of proposed metal recycling facility............................................................................. 5 Table 3-2 Non-statutory designated nature conservation sites............................................... 6 Plates Plate 3-1 Hard standing concrete surface, with demolition rubble pile in the distance ........ 10 Plate 3-2 Water tank surrounded by ephemeral and scattered scrub vegetation ................ 10 Plate 3-3 Bare ground being colonised by ephemeral vegetation and scattered butterfly- bush .............................................................................................................................. 11 Plate 3-4 Spoil pile ............................................................................................................... 12 Plate 3-5 Building 1 Off-site Habitats ................................................................................... 13 Plate 3-6 River Medway adjacent to the site, showing concrete wall along riverside .......... 13 JER5206 Proposed Metal Recycling Facility, New Hythe, Kent Planning & Development iii August 2011 Extended Phase 1 Habitat Survey Drawings JER5206-001 Phase 1 Habitats Map JER5206 Proposed Metal Recycling Facility, New Hythe, Kent Planning & Development iv August 2011 Extended Phase 1 Habitat Survey 1 Introduction 1.1 Scope of Works 1.1.1 RPS was commissioned to undertake an extended Phase 1 habitat survey of a previously developed industrial site in New Hythe, near Maidstone, Kent by Aylesford Metals Company. The site is centred at Ordnance Survey central grid reference TQ 714 595. It is proposed to construct a metal recycling facility in this area, on the site of a former paper recycling facility, with the total site area covering approximately 3ha. 1.1.2 The purpose of the ecology survey was to identify the habitats present within and around the site to provide baseline data on the ecological status of the land. The site walkover survey also assessed the potential for the site and adjoining habitats to be used by species that receive legal protection (at a UK and/or European level) and species that are otherwise notable including Species of Principal Importance, UK BAP priority species, and Birds of Conservation Concern. 1.1.3 Broad consideration has been given to potential ecological impacts that could arise as a result of the development proposals, including effects on designated sites in the area. 1.2 Site Description 1.2.1 The proposed metal recycling facility site is located on a brownfield development site situated at the eastern edge of an industrial complex in New Hythe, Kent. 1.2.2 The site application boundary is shown on Drawing Number JER5206-001. 1.2.3 The majority of the buildings and warehouses associated with the previous land-use have been demolished; therefore the site currently supports a large area of highly disturbed land supporting hard standing and gravel associated with the building clearance. Sparsely vegetated ground and scattered scrub is present on the southern boundary of the site. The site is surrounded by chain link fencing and heras fencing. 1.2.4 The site is bounded immediately to the east by the River Medway; separated from the site by a high concrete retaining wall. Further industrial premises surround the site to the north, south and west. A railway line bounds the site immediately to the west. An internal road within the industrial park bounds the site to the north. JER5206 Proposed Metal Recycling Facility, New Hythe, Kent Planning & Development 1 August 2011 Extended Phase 1 Habitat Survey 2 Methodology 2.1.1 The aim of the extended Phase 1 habitat survey is to provide an ecological assessment of the site. The survey of the site has been carried out in three stages: A desk study to collate records of designated sites, and protected species on the site and within the local area; A walkover field survey to identify and map habitats on the site, to assess floristic composition and abundance of these habitats and to assess the potential for habitats within the site to support protected or otherwise notable flora and fauna species; and, Collation and interpretation of the field survey results to assess the ecological condition of the site, taking into consideration habitat type and extent, floristic composition and the site’s potential to support protected and otherwise notable species. The desk study data and the ecological context of the site within the surrounding area and wider landscape help to inform this assessment. 2.1.2 The Phase 1 Habitat survey information has also been used to determine whether there is a need for additional supporting survey information with regards to species or species groups. 2.2 Desk Study 2.2.1 Information on statutory designated nature conservation sites within 2km of the site, and details of international designated sites within 10km of the site was sought from the Multi Agency Geographic Information for the Countryside (http://www.magic.gov.uk) and the Joint Nature Conservation Committee (http://www.jncc.gov.uk). 2.2.2 A request was submitted to the Kent and Medway Biological Records Centre (http://www.kmbrc.org.uk) for records of the following: Non-statutory designated nature conservation sites within 2km of the survey site; and, Records of legally protected species and other species of conservation concern within 2km of the site. JER5206 Proposed Metal Recycling Facility, New Hythe, Kent Planning & Development 2 August 2011 Extended Phase 1 Habitat Survey 2.3 Field Survey Site Walkover Survey 2.3.1 The walkover survey was conducted in accordance with The Handbook for Phase 1 Habitat Survey (JNCC 1990), and included searches for signs of protected species, as
Load more

Recommended publications
  • New Localities of Ophrys Insectifera (Orchidaceae) in Bulgaria
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE BALKAN SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE OF BIOLOGY IN PLOVDIV (BULGARIA) FROM 19TH TILL 21ST OF MAY 2005 (EDS B. GRUEV, M. NIKOLOVA AND A. DONEV), 2005 (P. 312–320) NEW LOCALITIES OF OPHRYS INSECTIFERA (ORCHIDACEAE) IN BULGARIA Tsvetomir Tsvetanov1,*, Vladimir Vladimirov1, Antoaneta Petrova2 1 - Institute of Botany, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria 2 - Botanical Garden, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria * - address for correspondence: [email protected] ABSTRACT. Two new localities of Ophrys insectifera (Orchidaceae) has been found in the Buynovo and Trigrad gorges in the Central Rhodope Mountains. The species had been previously known from a single locality in the Golo Bardo Mountain, where only one specimen had been detected recently. Therefore, the species was considered as an extremely rare in the Bulgarian flora and included in the Annex 3 (Protected species) to the national Biodiversity Act. A total of ca. 25 individuals has been found in the two new localities. Assessment of the species against the IUCN Red List Criteria at national level resulted in a national category “Critically endangered” (CR C2a(i)+D), based on the very small number of individuals in the populations, the limited area of occupancy and severely fragmented locations. KEY WORDS: new chorological data, Ophrys, Orchidaceae, critically endangered species, Rhodope Mts INTRODUCTION Ophrys is among the taxonomically most intricate vascular plant genera in the European flora. Following the taxonomic concept of Delforge (1995) it is represented with 5 species in the Bulgarian flora - O. apifera Huds., O. cornuta Steven, O. insectifera L., O. reinholdii H. Fleischm. and O. mammosa Desf. (Assyov & al.
    [Show full text]
  • Ophrys Insectifera L
    Ophrys insectifera L. Fly Orchid A slender orchid of woodland edges, calcareous fens and other open habitats, Ophrys insectifera has distinctive flowers that lure pollinators by mimicry and the release of pheromones. Flowers have a velvety, purplish- brown labellum with an iridescent blue patch and a broad terminal lobe with two shining ‘pseudoeyes’, and very narrow petals resembling a pair of antennae. Its British strongholds are in the south and east of England. Elsewhere it is scattered across the Midlands, northern England and southern Ireland, rare in Wales, and absent from Scotland. Substantial declines throughout its range have led to an assessment of Vulnerable in Great Britain. ©Pete Stroh IDENTIFICATION 2011). The (2-5) unspotted elliptic-oblong leaves from which the flowering spike arises have a shiny, bluish-green Ophrys insectifera stems can reach 60 cm in height but are appearance. often difficult to spot amid the surrounding vegetation. Three yellow-green sepals contrast with the much smaller (less than half as long) vertical, slender purplish-brown labellum which SIMILAR SPECIES has a velvety texture (Stace 2010) due to short, fine, downy The distinctive lateral lobes, filiform petals, and slender hairs. appearance of the labellum should readily separate it from The labellum has two narrow side lobes spreading outwards other Ophrys species. In rare instances, individuals of O. and a broad terminal lobe which is notched at the tip and has insectifera lack normal pigmentation (e.g. white sepals; two shining ‘pseudoeyes’ (Harrap & Harrap 2009). Flowers greenish-yellow patterning on the labellum). Natural also have a distinctive iridescent blue patch on the speculum, hybridization between O.
    [Show full text]
  • Orchid Observers
    Phenology of UK Plants Orchids and Zooniverse Mark Spencer & Kath Castillo Department of Life Sciences Natural History Museum Agrimonia eupatoria Robbirt & al. 2011 and UK specimens of Ophrys sphegodes Mill NHM Origins and Evolution Initiative: UK Phenology Project • 20,000 herbarium sheets imaged and transcribed • Volunteer contributed taxonomic revision, morphometric and plant/insect pollinator data compiled • Extension of volunteer work to extract additional phenology data from other UK museums and botanic gardens • 7,000 herbarium sheets curated and mounted • Collaboration with BSBI/Herbaria@Home • Preliminary analyses of orchid phenology underway Robbirt & al. (2011) . Validation of biological collections as a source of phenological data for use in climate change studies: a case study with the orchid Ophrys sphegodes. J. Ecol. Brooks, Self, Toloni & Sparks (2014). Natural history museum collections provide information on phenological change in British butterflies since the late-nineteenth century. Int. J. Biometeorol. Johnson & al. (2011) Climate Change and Biosphere Response: Unlocking the Collections Vault. Bioscience. Specimens of Gymnadenia conopsea (L.) R.Br Orchid Observers Phenology of UK Plants Orchids and Zooniverse Mark Spencer & Kath Castillo Department of Life Sciences Natural History Museum 56 species of wild orchid in the UK 29 taxa selected for this study Anacamptis morio Anacamptis pyramidalis Cephalanthera damasonium Coeloglossum viride Corallorhiza trifida Dactylorhiza fuchsii Dactylorhiza incarnata Dactylorhiza maculata Dactylorhiza praetermissa Dactylorhiza purpurella Epipactis palustris Goodyera repens Gymnadenia borealis Gymnadenia conopsea Gymnadenia densiflora Hammarbya paludosa Herminium monorchis Neotinea ustulata Neottia cordata Neottia nidus-avis Neottia ovata Ophrys apifera Ophrys insectifera Orchis anthropophora Orchis mascula Platanthera bifolia Platanthera chlorantha Pseudorchis albida Spiranthes spiralis Fly orchid (Ophrys insectifera) Participants: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution and Conservation Status of Some Rare and Threatened Orchid
    Wulfenia 24 (2017): 143 –162 Mitteilungen des Kärntner Botanikzentrums Klagenfurt Distribution and conservation status of some rare and threatened orchid taxa in the central Balkans and the southern part of the Pannonian Plain Vladan Djordjević, Dmitar Lakušić, Slobodan Jovanović & Vladimir Stevanović Summary: Along with being a centre of plant species diversity and endemism, the Balkan Peninsula is one of the parts of Europe with the highest number of orchid taxa. However, the orchid flora in the central Balkans has not been sufficiently studied. The paper presents the distribution of ten rare and threatened taxa of Orchidaceae in the central Balkans and the southern part of the Pannonian Plain: Anacamptis papilionacea, Epipactis palustris, E. purpurata, Epipogium aphyllum, Goodyera repens, Gymnadenia frivaldii, Ophrys apifera, O. insectifera, Orchis militaris and O. spitzelii subsp. spitzelii. In addition to field investigation, checking and revision of herbarium material, literature sources were also used for supplementing distribution data. The distribution maps of these taxa in the central Balkans (Serbia and Kosovo region) and the southern part of the Pannonian Plain (Vojvodina) are created on a 10 km × 10 km UTM grid system. Data concerning their habitat preferences, population size and the estimated IUCN conservation status in the study area are provided. Keywords: Orchidaceae, phytogeography, IUCN conservation status, Balkan Peninsula The orchid family is one of the largest and most diverse families in the plant kingdom with estimates of about 28 000 species distributed in about 763 genera (Chase et al. 2015; Christenhusz & Byng 2016). According to Hágsater & Dumont (1996), over 300 orchid species occur in Europe, North Africa and Near East.
    [Show full text]
  • ORCHID CONSERVATION NEWS the Newsletter of the Orchid Specialist Group of the IUCN Species Survival Commission
    ORCHID CONSERVATION NEWS The Newsletter of the Orchid Specialist Group of the IUCN Species Survival Commission Issue 1 March 2021 PATHS TOWARD CONSERVATION PROGRESS Orchid workshop at Bogotá Botanic Garden, Colombia in 2017 1 https://www.bgci.org/our-work/plant- Editorial conservation/conservation-prioritisation/ex-situ- At the time of this first Issue of 2021, many challenges surveys/ still lie before us, lots of unknowns yet to be determined with the pandemic at the forefront of our thoughts. We Why am I puzzled? Well firstly, I don’t know where are doing our best to continue our conservation work the figure of 38% has come from. Although encouraging despite constraints whether it be project planning, data progress is being made with Red Listing, I don’t think collection and management, seed banking, evaluating we know how many species are threatened globally. conservation strategies, or continuing studies of orchid Secondly, does just one individual plant count as an ex populations over the long term. With the situ collection? Surely we need to be focusing on unpredictability and randomness of natural events that conserving as far as possible the genetic diversity within may threaten orchid ecosystems, long-term monitoring each species. Thirdly, the table doesn’t tell me whether studies are being re-visited years, even decades after the collection is plants and/or seed. their initiation, to study what has been happening following severe disturbance. For example, Deschênes, The BGCI report asserts that botanical gardens are the Brice & Brisson (2019) have reported, after an initial main repository of orchid collections.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity and Planning in Epsom & Ewell
    Biodiversity and Planning in Epsom & Ewell Epsom & Ewell February 2012 Contents Contents 2 Section 1 -1a About this guidance 3 -1b Biodiversity in the planning process 4 -1c Information requirements 5 Section 2 -2a Internationally and nationally designated sites 6-8 -2b Legally protected species 9-11 Section 3 -3 Local sites and priority habitats and species 12 2 -3a Local sites 13-14 -3b Ancient woodland 15-16 -3c Priority habitats 17-19 -3d Priority species 20-21 -3e Other areas of importance to biodiversity 22-24 Section 4 -4a Biodiversity Opportunity Areas 25-27 -4b Green Infrastructure 28-30 -4c Biodiversity within developments 31 Section 5 -Key legislation and policy 32 Section 6 -Useful Contacts 33 Section 7 -Glossary 34 Section 8 -Acknowledgements 35 Appendix 1: Protected Species in Epsom & Ewell 36-39 Appendix 2: UK BAP species, local BAP habitat & designated sites in Epsom & Ewell 40-43 2 1a About this guidance Protecting Beauty, and Epsom enhancing & Ewell Epsom © & Ewell's biodiversity How to use this guidance Nick Turner The 1purpose About ofthis this guidance guidance is to assist Epsom & Ewell Borough This guidance has been arranged Council,Amethyst developers deceiver and ©residents Terry in ensuring that the Borough’s to align with national Planning Policy Statement 9: Biodiversity biodiversityLongley/seeing.org.uk is both protected and enhanced when new development take place. This guidance is linked to the Epsom & Ewell Local Biodiversity and Geological Conservation and ActionOtter Plan ©(EELBAP) Helen Walshand is an outcome of the EELBAP objectives. is divided into sections dealing Meadow pipit © Mike with various biodiversity features The BoroughTaylor/seeing.org.uk of Epsom & Ewell from the chalk grasslands of the Downs, which should be protected and enhanced through the planning through the ‘Ancient Woodland of Horton Country Park, to the many hectares of residential gardens provides a wide range of habitats that are system.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    Firenze University Press Caryologia www.fupress.com/caryologia International Journal of Cytology, Cytosystematics and Cytogenetics Comparison of the Evolution of Orchids with that of Bats Citation: A. Lima-de-Faria (2020) Comparison of the Evolution of Orchids with that of Bats. Caryologia 73(2): 51-61. doi: 10.13128/caryologia-891 Antonio Lima-de-Faria Received: February 12, 2020 Professor Emeritus of Molecular Cytogenetics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden E-mail: [email protected] Accepted: April 16, 2020 Published: July 31, 2020 Abstract. The evolution of orchids and bats is an example of DNA’s own evolution which has resulted in structures and functions which are not necessarily related to any Copyright: © 2020 A. Lima-de-Faria. obvious advantage to the organism. The flowers of orchids resemble: humans, apes, liz- This is an open access, peer-reviewed article published by Firenze University ards, frogs and even shoes. The faces of bats resemble plant leaves but also horseshoes. Press (http://www.fupress.com/caryo- These similarities are not accidental because they emerge repeatedly in different gen- logia) and distributed under the terms era and different families. This evolutionary situation bewildered botanists and zoolo- of the Creative Commons Attribution gists for many years, but is now elucidated by the molecular unification of plants and License, which permits unrestricted animals derived from the following evidence: (1) Contrary to expectation, plant and use, distribution, and reproduction animal cells (including those of humans) could be fused and the human chromosomes in any medium, provided the original were seen dividing in the plant cytoplasm. (2) Orchids, bats and humans have about author and source are credited.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancestral State Reconstruction of the Mycorrhizal Association for the Last Common Ancestor of Embryophyta, Given the Different Phylogenetic Constraints
    Supplementary information Supplementary Figures Figure S1 | Ancestral state reconstruction of the mycorrhizal association for the last common ancestor of Embryophyta, given the different phylogenetic constraints. Pie charts show the likelihood of the ancestral states for the MRCA of Embryophyta for each phylogenetic hypothesis shown below. Letters represent mycorrhizal associations: (A) Ascomycota; (B) Basidiomycota; (G) Glomeromycotina; (M) Mucoromycotina; (-) Non-mycorrhizal. Combinations of letters represent a combination of mycorrhizal associations. Austrocedrus chilensis Chamaecyparis obtusa Sequoiadendron giganteum Prumnopitys taxifolia Prumnopitys Prumnopitys montana Prumnopitys Prumnopitys ferruginea Prumnopitys Araucaria angustifolia Araucaria Dacrycarpus dacrydioides Dacrycarpus Taxus baccata Podocarpus oleifolius Podocarpus Afrocarpus falcatus Afrocarpus Ephedra fragilis Nymphaea alba Nymphaea Gnetum gnemon Abies alba Abies balsamea Austrobaileya scandens Austrobaileya Abies nordmanniana Thalictrum minus Thalictrum Abies homolepis Caltha palustris Caltha Abies magnifica ia repens Ranunculus Abies religiosa Ranunculus montanus Ranunculus Clematis vitalba Clematis Keteleeria davidiana Anemone patens Anemone Tsuga canadensis Vitis vinifera Vitis Tsuga mertensiana Saxifraga oppositifolia Saxifraga Larix decidua Hypericum maculatum Hypericum Larix gmelinii Phyllanthus calycinus Phyllanthus Larix kaempferi Hieronyma oblonga Hieronyma Pseudotsuga menziesii Salix reinii Salix Picea abies Salix polaris Salix Picea crassifolia Salix herbacea
    [Show full text]
  • Orchid Atlas-For-Print20160704
    Page 1 Bittern Countryside Community Interest Company An Atlas and Guide to the Orchids of the Arnside & Silverdale AONB Supporting the Arnside & Silverdale Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty Bittern Countryside Community Interest Company Registered Office: The Old Station Building, Arnside, LA5 0HG Registered number 6363720 © Bittern Countryside Community Interest Company, July 2016 Produced with assistance from the Arnside & Silverdale AONB Sustainable Development Fund Website:http://www.arnsidesilverdaleaonb.org.uk/AONB/Support/Bittern-Countryside-CIC.html Page 2 An Atlas and Guide to the Orchids of the AONB by Ann Kitchen, July 2016 Why have an Atlas and what is it for? For over 35 years the flora of the Arnside and Silverdale AONB has been recorded. First by Dr Margaret Baeker and Charles Bromley Webb followed by Julie Clarke who records for the BSBI. Geoffrey Halliday recorded the Cumbrian tetrads (2km squares) and Eric Greenwood the Lancashire ones for their Floras. Ken and I first got involved when we helped Charles Bromley Webb put all his records onto a computer. Julie and I went on to follow in his footsteps as the botanical recorders for the Arnside and District Natural History Society. Aided by a willing band of amateur botanists we have tried to record every species growing in each one-kilometre square (Monad) of the AONB and to record its progress through time. I suspect that there is still plenty out there to be discovered. We have not managed to cover all the squares. This is an attempt to make some of the knowledge we have gained available to the wider public.
    [Show full text]
  • Kent Habitat Works 2015
    1 Kent Rare Plant Register 2015 Appendix HABITAT WORKS Compiled by Owen Leyshon and the Kent Botanical Recording Group Issue date: March 2016 2 Introduction The purpose of this appendix is to provide the first in a set of regular updates, collating the practical habitat works targeted at Kent Rare Plant Register (RPR) species across the county of Kent in 2015. It concentrates on actual ‘hands-on’ works and interventions for individual species and does not aim to capture the vast amount of effort across the county by landowners to enhance and monitor key habitats. So, for example, there are not included many grazing programmes, woodland coppicing works or ditch maintenance regimes, which may have general habitat benefits without necessarily targeting key RPR species. The appendix also does not cover a number of habitat works on species which remain quite widespread across the county, such as namely Melampyrum pratense (Common Cow-wheat) and Carlina vulgaris, and also some works for the encouragement of species which might be uncommon in one end of the county but overall do not qualify for the Kent RPR, such as Ceratocapnos claviculata (Climbing Corydalis) and Samolus valerandi (Brookweed), where valuable actions are being undertaken, for example in the Bexley area. A fully comprehensive account is not to be expected, and if any key work or individual actions do not appear here, then details (including photographs, if available) will be welcome, and also contributions for the 2016 appendix. Please provide to the author, Owen Leyshon, [email protected] (work – 01797 367934). Many thanks to all the 2015 contributors, acknowledged below.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Are There So Many Bee-Orchid Species? Adaptive Radiation by Intraspecific Competition for Mnemonic Pollinators
    Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 17 October 2019 doi:10.20944/preprints201910.0204.v1 Why are there so many bee-orchid species? Adaptive radiation by intraspecific competition for mnemonic pollinators Michel Baguette1,2, Joris Bertrand3, Virginie M. Stevens2, Bertrand Schatz4 1Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Institut Systématique, Evolution, Biodiversité, UMR 7205, F-75005 Paris, France 2Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique and Université Paul Sabatier Toulouse III, SETE Station d’Ecologie Théorique et Expérimentale, UMR 5321, F-09200 Moulis, France 3 LGDP (Laboratoire Génome et Développement des Plantes) UMR5096, Université de Perpignan Via Domitia - CNRS, F-66860 Perpignan, France 4 CEFE (Centre d'Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive) UMR 5175, CNRS – Université de Montpellier – Université Paul Valéry – EPHE, 1919 Route de Mende, 34293 Montpellier, France ABSTRACT Adaptive radiations occur mostly in response to environmental variation through the evolution of key eco-morphological innovations that allow emerging species to occupy new ecological niches. However, rapid phenotypic evolution and the evolution of key novelties are likely to also occur when a couple or few species are engaged into narrow ecological interactions. To demonstrate coevolution is a difficult task; only elusive evidences confirm that coevolution is a driver of speciation and diversification. Here we propose that the adaptive radiation of the Mediterranean orchid genus Ophrys, which gave rise to ca. 350 species since the apparition of the genus is due to the particular co-evolutionary dynamics between these plants and their pollinators. We suggest that the pollination by sexual swindle used by Ophrys orchids is the main driver of this coevolution.
    [Show full text]
  • Protection of Norwegian Orchids – a Review of Achievements and Challenges
    European Journal of Environmental Sciences 121 PROTECTION OF NORWEGIAN ORCHIDS – A REVIEW OF ACHIEVEMENTS AND CHALLENGES JØRN ERIK BJØRNDALEN Jens Bjelkesgate 16A, N-0562 Oslo, Norway Corresponding author: [email protected] ABSTRACT Norway has a rich and diverse orchid flora consisting of 36 species. Orchids are found throughout the country, but most of the species are confined to calcareous or base-rich substrates. Important orchid-rich types of vegetation include rich pine and spruce forests, rich deciduous forests, open calcareous meadows, rocky outcrops and screes, hay meadows and calcareous mires and fens. Many species are rare, and 17 species and 3 subspecies are red listed. 13 species are generally protected. Both the orchids and their habitats are susceptible to various disturbances such as e.g. building activities, road construction, quarrying, drainage, forestry and changes in agricultural practices (less intense grazing, termination of mowing), which has resulted in the continuation of the previously inhibited succession. Most of the types of habitat mentioned are important conservation sites and thus many orchid occurrences (e.g. of Cypripedium calceolus, Epipogium aphyllum, Epipactis palustris and Ophrys insectifera) are protected by a network of nature reserves designated for these habitats. However, there is an urgent need to secure species with small populations in some of the mire reserves, and succession is also a problem in many of the reserves. Protection of the few existing localities for some species is also needed. A more detailed discussion of the status of the red listed species is presented. Keywords: orchid conservation, nature reserves, management, orchid habitats, Norway Introduction classification of the taxa of Norwegian Dactylorhiza, which greatly differs from Lid and Lid (2005), but this Orchids are an important group of organisms associ- discussion is beyond the scope of the present paper.
    [Show full text]