Endangered Species

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Endangered Species Endangered Species UPDATEIncludingEndawered a Reprint Species of theTechnical latest USFWS Bulletin THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN March 1988 Vol. 5 No. 5 School of Natural Resources In this issue: The Longleaf Pine Habitat Loss Landscape of the Threatens Two Mid- Southeast: Almost Gone western Plants and Almost Forgotten Service Decides Not To List Spotted Owl The Longleaf Pine Landscape the Southeast: Almost Gone and Almost Forgotten by Reed F. Noss Escaping bleak northern winters, was once an open pine savanna with a ent, and had lower lire frequencies. perhaps for the rest of their lives, hordes dense carpet of wiregrass (Aristida Hammocks usually occurred on slopes, of visitors to the southeast are greeted stricta) and wildflowers became a and on islands, peninsulas, and other by a mass of green as they arrive on the thicket of hardwoods. Today, intensive areas protected from fire (Harper 1911). coastal plain. Many northern visitors forestry (even on public lands such as In the coastal plain, very subtle changes express amazement that so much of this national and state forests) and urban and in elevation (sometimes on the order of region is still "wilderness." Unfortu- agricultural development threaten the a few centimeters) can have profound nately, what the unfamiliar see as ver- few remaining semi-natural stands. effects on plant species composition dant wilderness is actually a severely This article summarizes some unique (e.g., Abraharnson et al. 1984). Slopes degraded landscape. The dense pine ecological aspects of the longleaf pine greater than 15 degrees are very effec- plantations and second-growth hard- landscape, and suggests a strategy to tive firebreaks (Wate et al., in press ). woods that appear natural to the untu- In Florida and small portions of ad- tored eye are artificial assemblages, -- joining states, another upland commu- vastly different in structure and comp nity, "scrub," occurred usually as is- sition from the vast, open piney woods The dense pine plantations lands of often dense sand pine (Pinus that stretched in presettlement times and second-growth hard- clausa) and short-statured oaks from Virginia to Texas. (particularly Quercus myrtifolia, Q. When the first European settlers woods that appear natural geminata, and Q. chapmanii ) in the came to the southeastern coastal plain, to the untutored eye are open sea of longleaf (Myers, in press). they were impressed by the open, park- artificial assemblages, The sharp discontinuities between like character of the "pine barrens* vastly different in structure scrub and longleaf communities, once which dominated this region (Bartram and composition from the thought to reflect soil differences 1791, Williams 1837). William Bar- (Laessle 1958), appear to be largely a tram wrote that "this plain is mostly a vast, open piney woods result of fire history, in part controlled forest of the great long-leafed pine that stretched in presettle- by the vegetation itself (Myers 1985). (Pinus palustris Linn.); the earth cov- ment times from Virginia Whereas Florida longleaf pine commu- ered with grass, interspersed with an to Texas. nities bum lightly at 2 to 5 year intervals infinite variety of herbaceous plants...." under natural conditions, scrub bums At this time, longleaf pine communities catastrophically every 10 to 40 years or covered at least 60 or 70 million acres, longer. Soil differences are determined over 60% of the upland area of the by the vegetation, rather than vice versa restore and maintain viable examples of coastal plain (Wahlenberg 1946, (Kalisz and Stone 1984). As uplands, Croker 1979, Ware et al., in press). The this landscape in perpetuity. both scrub and longleaf communities presettlement distribution of longleaf are readily developable and do not have pine communities is shown in Fig. 1. Ecology the regulatory protection afforded to Today these communities cover less Longleaf pine communities, as the wetlands in Florida (Hart 1987, Noss than 10 million acres (Croker 1979), dominant vegetation of the southeastern 1987a). and almost all of this acreage is second- coastal plain, formed the matrix in Longleaf pine communities can be growth and degraded by logging, which other plant communities were divided into two general types: turpentining, grazing, and disruption of embedded. The longleaf pine landscape sandhills (also called "high pine," in- the natural fire regime. comprised several associations domi- cluding sites with more clayey soils, or Fire was the natural force that main- nated by longleaf pine in the overstory "clayhills") and flatwoods. Christensen tained longleaf pine communities. and wiregrass in the ground layer, with (in press) divides the sandhill commu- When fire frequencies and spread of strips and patches of other community- nity into three subgroups: pine-turkey fires were reduced by deliberate sup- types such as hammocks (mesic hard- oak (Quercus luevis) sandridge, fall- pression and by artificial firebreaks, wood forests) and various wetlands. line sandhill, and Florida sandhill asso- such as roads and developments, the These communities were below long- ciations. Pine-turkey oak sandridge for- community changed radically. What leaf pine on the slope-moisture gradi- ests are found in austere habitats such as Vo1. 5 No. 5 Endangered Species UPDATE I Endangered Spades UPDATE A forum for information exchange on endangeredspccies issues March 1988 Vd. 5 No. 5 Kathryn Kohn ........ Editor Miclwl Soule ..........Faatlry Advisor Yu Man Lee.............. Produdion Asrict. I~~~huctionsfor Authors: Figure 1: Distribution of Longleaf Pine Communities, adapted from The Endangered Species UPDATE Ware et al., in prw welcomes micler related to specia pmtection in r wide mnge of areas in- cludiig but not limited to: iswrch and ridge tops, sand rims of the California pines dominated the mesic flatwoods, mmagement activities for endrngered coastal bays, and relict dune ridges on the most common flatwoods commu- rpecier, themtical rpprorcha to rpecia lower coastal tenaces. These communi- nity, but have been largely replaced by consemtion, and habitat pdonmd pesetve design. Bodr reviews, editaid ties have a characteristic herb layer of the faster-growing slash pine (Pinus el- oanments, and um0un-e of lichens. The fall-line sandhills, a mostly liottii) by foresters. Mesic flatwoods are cunent events and publicrtiona are also continuous band of rolling hills more open than other flatwoods com- welcome. extending hmsouthern North Caro- munities. Saw palmetto (Serenou re- Readers include a broad nnge of lina to Alabama, vary with topography pens) is the most common shrub, but professionals in bxh scientific and and associated soil differences some well-burned stands have virtually policy fields. Articles should be written (Christensen, in press). Florida sandhill no shrub layer. Lower, wet flatwoods, in an easily understandable style for a associations have three phases, co- and those near the coast, are usually knowledgeable audience. Manuscripts should be 7-10 double dominated by turkey oak on the driest dominated by slash pine, with thick spaced typed pager. For fwther sites, bluejack oak or sand post oak patches of saw palmetto, gallberry (Ilex information please contact Kathryn (Quercus incana or Q. margaretta, re- glabra or I. coriacea), fetterbush Kdvn at the number listed below. spectively) on finer-textured, more fer- (Lyonia lucida), wax myrtle (Myrica tile soils, and southern red oak (Quercus cerifera) and other shrubs. The wettest Subscription Infowmtwn: falcata) on calcareous soils, grading flatwoods are generally dominated by The Endangered Species UPDATE is into the southern mixed hardwood for- pond pine (Pinus serotina) with loblolly pblished monthly by the Shod of est (Monk 1968, Christensen, in press). bay (Gordonia lasianthus) and a dense Natural Resources at The University of The clayhill community in the red hill shrub layer. Michigan. Annual rubmiptions arc S 15 each ($18 outside the U.S.). Send cfieclc country of southern Georgia and adja- The two characteristic species of a money ader (made payable to The cent Florida (Harper 1906, Means, in virtually all longleaf pine communities University of Michigan) to: press) is essentially equivalent to the are longleaf pine and wiregrass. Wire- Endangered Species UPDATE bluejack oak-sand post oak phase of grass is a bunch grass that grows ex- School of Natural Resources Florida sandhill. tremely dense under natural conditions 'he University of Michigan In contrast to the various sandhill or of frequent fire. Competition with the Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1 115 high pine associations, flatwoods oc- overlapping roots of wiregrass plants (31 3)763-3243 cupy low, flat sites which can be fairly may be one important mechanism of arid but are poorly-drained in wet peri- hardwood exclusion in longleaf pine Cmc ods. Flatwoods are the most extensive communities (Clewell 198 1). Wire- vegetation type in Florida, occupying grass, like many herbaceous plants of Red-Cockaded Woodpecker some 5Wo of the state (Davis 1967, longleaf communities, normally flow- (Picoidcsborealip) Abrahamson and Hartnett, in press). In ers only after summer fues, and viable Photo by Reed Nosc contrast to sandhills, there is often a seeds are rarely produced; no seedlings well-developed shrub layer. Longleaf have ever been reported in the field. Vol. 5 No. 5 Endangered Species UPDATE 2 Wiregrass may be a climatic relict, with adequate to account for the dominance tors such as rat snakes. The average age present clumps
Recommended publications
  • Burn Severity in a Central Florida Sand Pine Scrub Wilderness Area
    BURN SEVERITY IN A CENTRAL FLORIDA SAND PINE SCRUB WILDERNESS AREA By DAVID ROBERT GODWIN A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2008 1 © 2008 David Robert Godwin 2 To my family and grandparents who have worked tirelessly to provide for my education and who instilled in me an interest in the natural world. 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This study would not have been possible without the encouragement, support, and guidance of my major professor (Dr. Leda Kobziar) and my supervisory committee members (Dr. Scot Smith and Dr. George Tanner). This research was funded by a grant from the University of Florida Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (IFAS) Innovation Fund entitled: “Fire in The Juniper Prairie Wilderness: A Viable Management Tool?” Data analysis assistance was graciously provided by Dr. Leda Kobziar and Meghan Brennan, IFAS Statistics Department. Field data were collected through the tireless assistance of University of Florida Fire Science Lab technicians and students: Erin Maehr, Mia Requensens, Chris Kinslow and Cori Peters. Remote sensing software guidance and meticulous digital aerial imagery delineations were provided by Zoltan Szantoi, with help from Dr. Alan Long and Dr. Leda Kobziar. Some spatial data were provided by the Ocala National Forest, USDA Forest Service, through the assistance of Mike Drayton and Janet Hinchee. SPOT images were purchased through funds provided by Dr. Scott Smith. Landsat images were obtained from the Multi- Resolution Land Characteristics Consortium (MRLC). Finally, I thank my loving wife, brother, parents and grandparents for their patience, encouragement and dedication to my completion of this study.
    [Show full text]
  • Euphorbia Telephioides (Euphorbiaceae)
    Genetic diversity within a threatened, endemic North American species, Euphorbia telephioides (Euphorbiaceae) Dorset W. Trapnell, J. L. Hamrick & Vivian Negrón-Ortiz Conservation Genetics ISSN 1566-0621 Conserv Genet DOI 10.1007/s10592-012-0323-4 1 23 Your article is protected by copyright and all rights are held exclusively by Springer Science+Business Media B.V.. This e-offprint is for personal use only and shall not be self- archived in electronic repositories. If you wish to self-archive your work, please use the accepted author’s version for posting to your own website or your institution’s repository. You may further deposit the accepted author’s version on a funder’s repository at a funder’s request, provided it is not made publicly available until 12 months after publication. 1 23 Author's personal copy Conserv Genet DOI 10.1007/s10592-012-0323-4 RESEARCH ARTICLE Genetic diversity within a threatened, endemic North American species, Euphorbia telephioides (Euphorbiaceae) Dorset W. Trapnell • J. L. Hamrick • Vivian Negro´n-Ortiz Received: 23 September 2011 / Accepted: 20 January 2012 Ó Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012 Abstract The southeastern United States and Florida which it occurs, Gulf (0.084), Franklin (0.059) and Bay support an unusually large number of endemic plant spe- Counties (0.033), were also quite low. Peripheral popula- cies, many of which are threatened by anthropogenic tions did not generally have reduced genetic variation habitat disturbance. As conservation measures are under- although there was significant isolation by distance. Rare- taken and recovery plans designed, a factor that must be faction analysis showed a non-significant relationship taken into consideration is the genetic composition of the between allelic richness and actual population sizes.
    [Show full text]
  • Petition for the Release of Aphthona Cyparissiae Against Leafy Spurge in the United States1
    Reprinted with permission from: USDA-ARS, March 19, 1986, unpublished. Petition for the release of Aphthona cyparissiae against leafy spurge in the 1 United States ROBERT W. PEMBERTON Part I TO: Dr. R. Bovey, Dept. of Range Science USDA/ARS/SR Texas A&M University College Station, TX 77843 U.S.A. Enclosed are the results of the research on the flea beetle Aphthona cyparissiae (Chrysomelidae). This petition is composed of two parts. The first is the report “Aph- thona cyparissiae (Kock) and A. flava Guill. (Coleopera: Chrysomelidae): Two candi- dates for the biological control of cypress and leafy spurge in North America” by G. Sommer and E. Maw which the Working Group reviewed on Canada’s behalf. Copies of this report should be in the Working Group’s files. This research, which was done at the Commonwealth Institute of Biological Control’s Delémont, Switzerland lab, showed A. cyparissiae to be specific to the genus Euphorbia of the Euphorbiaceae. This result agrees with the literature and field records for A. cyparissiae, which recorded it from: Euphorbia cyparissias, E. esula, E. peplus, E. seguieriana, and E. virgata. The Sommer and Maw report also included information on A. cyparissiae’s taxonomic position, life history, laboratory biology, mortality factors, feeding effects on the host plants, the Harris scoring system, as well as a brief description of the target plant – leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula complex), a serious pest of the rangelands of the Great Plains of North America. Based on this research, the Working Group gave permission to release A. cyparissiae in Canada and to import it into the USDA’s Biological Control of Weeds Quarantine in Al- bany, California, for additional testing.
    [Show full text]
  • Backyard Biodiversity Day 2020 List of Native Plants for Sale from Green Isle Gardens Page 1 of 3
    Backyard Biodiversity Day 2020 List of Native Plants for Sale from Green Isle Gardens Common Name Botanical Name Size Adam's needle Yucca filamentosa 1 Gallon Apalachicola Rosemary Conradina glabra 1 Gallon Bear Grass Nolina brittoniana 1 Gallon Beautyberry Callicarpa americana 3 Gallon Beebalm Monarda punctata 1 Gallon Blackeyed Susan Rudbeckia hirta 1 Gallon Blanket Flower Gallardia pulchella 1 Gallon Blazing Star Liatris gracilis 1 Gallon Blazing Star Liatris spicata 1 Gallon Blue Curls Trichostema dichotomum 1 Gallon Blueberry Vaccinium darrowi 3 Gallon Blue-eyed grass Sisyrinchium angustifolium 1 Gallon Broomsedge Andropogon spp 1 Gallon Calamint Calamintha spp. 1 Gallon Cardinal Flower Lobelia cardinalis 1 Gallon Chaulky Bluestem Andropogon spp 1 Gallon chickasaw plum Prunus angustifolia 3 Gallon Coontie Zamia pumila 1 Gallon Coontie Zamia pumila 3 Gallon Coral bean Erythrina herbacea 1 Gallon Coral honeysuckle Lonicera sempervirens 1 Gallon Cordgrass Spartina bakeri 1 Gallon Corn Snakeroot Eryngium aquaticum 1 Gallon crab apple Malus angustifolia 3 Gallon creeping sage Salvia misella 1 Gallon Cross vine Bignonia capreolata 1 Gallon Cutleaf Coneflower Rudbekia laciniata 1 Gallon dune sunflower Heliantus debilis 1 Gallon Dwarf Fakahatchee Tripsacum floridana 1 Gallon Dwarf palmetto Sabal minor 3 Gallon Dwarf Walter's Vib Viburnum obovatum dwarf 3 Gallon Elderberry Sambucus canadensis 1 Gallon Elephant's foot Elephantopus elatus 1 Gallon Fakahatchee Tripsacum dactyloides 1 Gallon false indigo Amorpha fructicosa 1 Gallon Firebush Hamelia
    [Show full text]
  • (Fabaceae) at Wild and Introduced Locations in Florida Scrub
    Plant Ecol DOI 10.1007/s11258-014-0310-6 Microhabitat of critically endangered Lupinus aridorum (Fabaceae) at wild and introduced locations in Florida scrub Matthew L. Richardson • Juliet Rynear • Cheryl L. Peterson Received: 23 September 2013 / Accepted: 30 January 2014 Ó Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht (outside the USA) 2014 Abstract Elucidating microhabitat preferences of a Our research determined that L. aridorum is diploid and rare species are critical for its conservation. Lupinus grew, on average, in areas closer to trees and shrubs, aridorum McFarlin ex Beckner (Fabaceae) is a critically with lower soil moisture, and with a greater mixture of endangered plant known only from a few locations in detritus than random locations. Some microhabitat imperiled Florida scrub habitat and nothing is known characteristics at locations where L. aridorum were about its preferred microhabitat. Our goals were three- introduced were similar to microhabitat supporting wild fold. First, determine whether L. aridorum has multiple L. aridorum, but multiple soil characteristics differed as cytotypes because this can influence its spatial distribu- did the plant community, which contained more non- tion. Second, measure how microhabitat characteristics native plant species near introduced plants. Therefore, at locations supporting wild L. aridorum vary from the realized niche is narrower than the fundamental random locations, which will provide information about niche. Overall, information about the microhabitat of microhabitat characteristics that influence the spatial L. aridorum canbeusedtodesignappropriatemanage- distribution of individuals. Third, measure whether ment programs to conserve and restore populations of microhabitat characteristics differ between locations this plant species and species that occupy a similar niche supporting wild or introduced plants, which will provide in imperiled Florida scrub.
    [Show full text]
  • St. Joseph Bay Native Species List
    Status Common Name Species Name State Federal Amphibians Salamanders Flatwoods Salamander Ambystoma cingulatum SSC T Marbled Salamander Ambystoma opacum Mole Salamander Ambystoma talpoideum Eastern Tiger Salamander Ambystoma tigrinum tigrinum Two-toed Amphiuma Amphiuma means One-toed Amphiuma Amphiuma pholeter Southern Dusky Salamander Desmognathus auriculatus Dusky Salamander Desmognathus fuscus Southern Two-lined Salamander Eurycea bislineata cirrigera Three-lined Salamander Eurycea longicauda guttolineata Dwarf Salamander Eurycea quadridigitata Alabama Waterdog Necturus alabamensis Central Newt Notophthalmus viridescens louisianensis Slimy Salamander Plethodon glutinosus glutinosus Slender Dwarf Siren Pseudobranchus striatus spheniscus Gulf Coast Mud Salamander Pseudotriton montanus flavissimus Southern Red Salamander Pseudotriton ruber vioscai Eastern Lesser Siren Siren intermedia intermedia Greater Siren Siren lacertina Toads Oak Toad Bufo quercicus Southern Toad Bufo terrestris Eastern Spadefoot Toad Scaphiopus holbrooki holbrooki Frogs Florida Cricket Frog Acris gryllus dorsalis Eastern Narrow-mouthed Frog Gastrophryne carolinensis Western Bird-voiced Treefrog Hyla avivoca avivoca Cope's Gray Treefrog Hyla chrysoscelis Green Treefrog Hyla cinerea Southern Spring Peeper Hyla crucifer bartramiana Pine Woods Treefrog Hyla femoralis Barking Treefrog Hyla gratiosa Squirrel Treefrog Hyla squirella Gray Treefrog Hyla versicolor Little Grass Frog Limnaoedus ocularis Southern Chorus Frog Pseudacris nigrita nigrita Ornate Chorus Frog Pseudacris
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Noxious Weed Management Plan: US Air Force Academy and Farish Recreation Area, El Paso County, CO
    Integrated Noxious Weed Management Plan US Air Force Academy and Farish Recreation Area August 2015 CNHP’s mission is to preserve the natural diversity of life by contributing the essential scientific foundation that leads to lasting conservation of Colorado's biological wealth. Colorado Natural Heritage Program Warner College of Natural Resources Colorado State University 1475 Campus Delivery Fort Collins, CO 80523 (970) 491-7331 Report Prepared for: United States Air Force Academy Department of Natural Resources Recommended Citation: Smith, P., S. S. Panjabi, and J. Handwerk. 2015. Integrated Noxious Weed Management Plan: US Air Force Academy and Farish Recreation Area, El Paso County, CO. Colorado Natural Heritage Program, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado. Front Cover: Documenting weeds at the US Air Force Academy. Photos courtesy of the Colorado Natural Heritage Program © Integrated Noxious Weed Management Plan US Air Force Academy and Farish Recreation Area El Paso County, CO Pam Smith, Susan Spackman Panjabi, and Jill Handwerk Colorado Natural Heritage Program Warner College of Natural Resources Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado 80523 August 2015 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Various federal, state, and local laws, ordinances, orders, and policies require land managers to control noxious weeds. The purpose of this plan is to provide a guide to manage, in the most efficient and effective manner, the noxious weeds on the US Air Force Academy (Academy) and Farish Recreation Area (Farish) over the next 10 years (through 2025), in accordance with their respective integrated natural resources management plans. This plan pertains to the “natural” portions of the Academy and excludes highly developed areas, such as around buildings, recreation fields, and lawns.
    [Show full text]
  • Groundcover Restoration in Forests of the Southeastern United States
    Groundcover RestorationIN FORESTS OF THE SOUTHEASTERN UNITED STATES Jennifer L. Trusty & Holly K. Ober Acknowledgments The funding for this project was provided by a cooperative • Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission of resource managers and scientific researchers in Florida, • Florida Department of Environmental Protection Conserved Forest Ecosystems: Outreach and Research • Northwest Florida Water Management District (CFEOR). • Southwest Florida Water Management District • Suwannee River Water Management District CFEOR is a cooperative comprised of public, private, non- government organizations, and landowners that own or We are grateful to G. Tanner for making the project manage Florida forest lands as well as University of Florida possible and for providing valuable advice on improving the faculty members. CFEOR is dedicated to facilitating document. We are also indebted to the many restorationists integrative research and outreach that provides social, from across the Southeast who shared information with J. ecological, and economic benefits to Florida forests on a Trusty. Finally, we thank H. Kesler for assistance with the sustainable basis. Specifically, funding was provided by maps and L. DeGroote, L. Demetropoulos, C. Mackowiak, C. Matson and D. Printiss for assistance with obtaining photographs. Cover photo: Former slash pine plantation with restored native groundcover. Credits: L. DeGroote. Suggested citation: Trusty, J. L., and H. K. Ober. 2009. Groundcover restoration in forests of the Southeastern United States. CFEOR Research Report 2009-01. University of Florida, Gainesville, FL. 115 pp. | 3 | Table of Contents INTRODUCTION . 7 PART I - Designing and Executing a Groundcover PART II – Resources to Help Get the Job Done Restoration Project CHAPTER 6: Location of Groundcover CHAPTER 1: Planning a Restoration Project .
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of Season of Fire on the Recovery of Florida Scrub
    2B.7 THE EFFECT OF SEASON OF FIRE ON THE RECOVERY OF FLORIDA SCRUB Tammy E. Foster* and Paul A. Schmalzer Dynamac Corporation, Kennedy Space Center, Florida 1. ABSTRACT∗ scrub, rosemary scrub, and scrubby flatwoods (Myers 1990, Abrahamson and Hartnett 1990). Florida scrub is a xeromorphic shrubland that is Florida scrub is habitat for threatened and maintained by frequent fires. Historically, these fires endangered plants and animals (Christman and Judd occurred during the summer due to lightning ignition. 1990, Stout and Marion 1993, Stout 2001). Today, Florida scrub is often managed by the use of Management of remaining scrub is critical to the survival prescribed burning. Prescribed burning of scrub has of these species. Scrub is a fire-maintained system been implemented on Kennedy Space Center/Merritt (Myers 1990, Menges 1999), and recovery after fire of Island National Wildlife Refuge (KSC/MINWR) since oak scrub and scrubby flatwoods is primarily through 1981, with burns being carried out throughout the year. sprouting and, in some species, clonal spread of the The impacts of the season of burn on recovery are not dominant shrubs (Abrahamson 1984a, 1984b, known. Long-term monitoring of scrub regeneration has Schmalzer and Hinkle 1992a, Menges and Hawkes been conducted since the early-1980’s at KSC/MINWR 1998). Scrub naturally burned during the summer using permanent 15 m line-intercept transects. We months due to lightning ignition. However, landscape obtained data from eight transects that were subjected fragmentation and fire suppression have reduced fire to a winter burn in 1986 and a summer burn in 1997 and size and frequency (Myers 1990, Duncan and compared the recovery of the stand for the first five Schmalzer 2001).
    [Show full text]
  • Panflora Site Plant List Apalachicola Bluffs and Ravines Preserve (TNC) Generated: 7 June 2005 Copyright: Gil Nelson 186 Records
    PanFlora Site Plant List Apalachicola Bluffs and Ravines Preserve (TNC) Generated: 7 June 2005 Copyright: Gil Nelson 186 Records Acer negundo (BOXELDER) Acer rubrum (RED MAPLE) Aesculus pavia (RED BUCKEYE) Agalinis divaricata (PINELAND FALSE FOXGLOVE) Albizia julibrissin (MIMOSA) Amelanchier arborea (COMMON SERVICEBERRY) Arenaria lanuginosa (SPREADING SANDWORT) Arenaria serpyllifolia (THYMELEAF SANDWORT) Arisaema dracontium (GREENDRAGON) Arisaema quinatum (PESTER-JOHN) Arisaema triphyllum (JACK-IN-THE-PULPIT) Aristida stricta beyrichiana (WIREGRASS) Aristolochia serpentaria (VIRGINIA SNAKEROOT) Aristolochia tomentosa (WOOLLY DUTCHMAN'S-PIPE; PIPEVINE) Arundinaria gigantea (SWITCHCANE) Asarum arifolium (WILD GINGER; LITTLE BROWN JUG; HEARTLEAF WILD GINGER) Asimina parviflora (SMALLFLOWER PAWPAW) Asplenium platyneuron (EBONY SPLEENWORT) Athyrium filix-femina asplenioides (SOUTHERN LADY FERN) Aureolaria flava (SMOOTH YELLOW FALSE FOXGLOVE) Baptisia lanceolata (GOPHERWEED) Berlandiera pumila (SOFT GREENEYES) Betula nigra (RIVER BIRCH) Bignonia capreolata (CROSSVINE) Boechera canadensis (SICKLEPOD) Calamintha dentata (FLORIDA CALAMINT; TOOTHED SAVORY) Callicarpa americana (AMERICAN BEAUTYBERRY) Calycanthus floridus (EASTERN SWEETSHRUB; CAROLINA ALLSPICE) Calycocarpum lyonii (CUPSEED) Carex baltzellii (BALTZELL'S SEDGE) Carex digitalis (SLENDER WOODLAND SEDGE) Carex nigromarginata floridana (BLACKEDGE SEDGE) Carpinus caroliniana (AMERICAN HORNBEAM; BLUEBEECH) Carya glabra (PIGNUT HICKORY) Carya pallida (SAND HICKORY) Ceanothus microphyllus (LITTLELEAF
    [Show full text]
  • Macbridea Alba
    Macbridea alba (White birds-in-a-nest) 5-Year Review: Summary and Evaluation Lathrop Management Area, Bay County. Photos by Vivian Negrón-Ortiz U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Southeast Region Panama City Field Office Panama City, Florida 5-YEAR REVIEW Macbridea alba (White birds-in-a-nest) I. GENERAL INFORMATION A. Methodology used to complete the review This review was accomplished using information obtained from the plant’s 1994 Recovery Plan, peer reviewed scientific publications, unpublished field survey results, reports of current research projects, unpublished field observations by Service, State and other experienced biologists, and personal communications. These documents are on file at the Panama City Field Office. A Federal Register notice announcing the review and requesting information was published on April 16, 2008 (73 FR 20702). Comments received and suggestions from peer reviewers were evaluated and incorporated as appropriate (see appendix A). No part of this review was contracted to an outside party. This review was completed by the Service’s lead Recovery botanist in the Panama City Field Office, Florida. B. Reviewers Lead Field Office: Dr. Vivian Negrón-Ortiz, Panama City Field Office, 850-769-0552 ext. 231, [email protected] Lead Region: Southeast Region: Kelly Bibb, 404-679-7132 Peer reviewers: Ms. Louise Kirn, District Ecologist Apalachicola National Forest P.O. Box 579, Bristol, FL 32321 Ms. Faye Winters, Field Office Biologist BLM Jackson Field Office 411 Briarwood Drive, Suite 404 Jackson, MS 39206 C. Background 1. FR Notice citation announcing initiation of this review: 73 FR 20702 (April 16, 2008). 1 2. Species status: Unknown (Recovery Data Call 2008); the species status is unknown until all the Element Occurrences1 (EO’s) are revisited.
    [Show full text]
  • Status and Management of Scrub Habitat on the Ocala National Forest
    United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Status and management of scrub habitat on the Ocala National Forest Landscape Scale Assessment National Forests in Florida Version 1, October 2015 National Forests in Florida Ocala scrub assessment For More Information Contact: Matthew D. Trager NEPA Coordinator, National Forests in Florida 325 John Knox Rd., Suite F-100 Tallahassee FL 32303 Phone: 850-523-8582 Email: [email protected] U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication for program information (e.g. Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) please contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. 2 National Forests in Florida Ocala scrub assessment Contents Objectives and scope ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]