DOCSLIB.ORG

University of Embu Philemon Orwa Masters Thesis 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
University of Embu Philemon Orwa Masters Thesis 2020 UNIVERSITY OF EMBU PHILEMON ORWA MASTERS THESIS 2020 DIVERSITY AND BIOLOGICAL CONTROL POTENTIAL OF HALOALKALIPHILIC FUNGI FROM LAKE MAGADI, KENYA PHILEMON ORWA A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY IN THE UNIVERSITY OF EMBU JANUARY, 2020 DECLARATION This thesis is my original work and has not been presented for a degree in any other University Signature………………………. Date…………………………… Philemon Orwa Department of Biological Sciences B526/1125/2017 This thesis has been submitted for examination with our approval as the University Supervisors Signature…………………….. Date…………………............. Dr. Romano Mwirichia, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Embu. Signature …………………….. Date………………………… Dr. Vitalis Wekesa, Flamingo Horticulture (K) Ltd (Dudutech Division), Naivasha Signature……………………… Date…………………………. Dr. George Mugambi, Meru University of Science and Technology. ii DEDICATION I dedicate this work to Almighty God, my family and my mentor Dr. Romano Mwirichia. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I acknowledge University of Embu for awarding me a scholarship to cover the tuition fees. Special thanks to my first supervisor Dr. Romano Mwirichia who was always there to oversee all my lab work and provided me with funds throughout my study. I also thank my other two supervisors, Dr. Vitalis Wekesa and Dr. George Mugambi for their guidance and advices. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS DECLARATION .............................................................................................................. ii DEDICATION ................................................................................................................. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ................................................................................................ iv TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................... v LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................ ix LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................... x LIST OF PLATES ............................................................................................................ xi LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ........................................................ xii ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................... xiii CHAPTER ONE .............................................................................................................. 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Background information ........................................................................................... 1 1.2 Statement of the problem ......................................................................................... 4 1.3 Justification .............................................................................................................. 4 1.4 Hypothesis ................................................................................................................ 5 1.5 Objectives ................................................................................................................. 5 1.5.1 General objective ............................................................................................... 5 1.5.2 Specific objectives ............................................................................................. 5 CHAPTER TWO ............................................................................................................. 6 LITERATURE REVIEW ................................................................................................ 6 2.1 Soda lake environments ............................................................................................ 6 2.2 Microbial biodiversity and productivity of soda lakes ............................................. 6 2.3 Fungal diversity in extreme ecosystems ................................................................... 7 v 2.4 Fungal adaptation to extreme salinity ...................................................................... 8 2.5 Production of secondary metabolites by haloalkaliphilic/halotolerant fungi ........... 9 2.6 Fungi as biological control agents .......................................................................... 11 CHAPTER THREE ....................................................................................................... 13 MATERIALS AND METHODS .................................................................................. 13 3.1 Study site ................................................................................................................ 13 3.2 Sample collection ................................................................................................... 14 3.3 Media preparation ................................................................................................... 14 3.4 Fungal isolation ...................................................................................................... 15 3.4.1 Dilution plate technique ................................................................................... 15 3.5 Morphological characterization of the isolates....................................................... 15 3.5.1 Colonial morphology ....................................................................................... 15 3.5.2 Cellular morphology ........................................................................................ 15 3.6 Physiological characterization of the isolates......................................................... 15 3.6.1 Tolerance to different salt concentration ......................................................... 16 3.6.2 Tolerance to different pH ................................................................................. 16 3.6.3 Tolerance to different temperatures ................................................................. 16 3.7 Biochemical characterization of the isolates .......................................................... 16 3.7.1 Determination of esterase and lipase activity .................................................. 18 3.7.2 Determination of proteinase activity................................................................ 18 3.7.3 Determination of pectinase activity ................................................................. 18 3.7.4 Determination of Amylolytic activity .............................................................. 18 3.7.5 Determination of the cellulolytic activity ........................................................ 18 3.7.6 Determination of peroxidase/laccase activity .................................................. 19 3.7.7 Determination of chitinase activity .................................................................. 19 vi 3.8 Molecular characterization ..................................................................................... 19 3.8.1 DNA Extraction ............................................................................................... 19 3.8.2 PCR amplification of 18S rRNA ..................................................................... 20 3.8.3 Purification of PCR products and sequencing ................................................. 21 3.8.4 Phylogenetic data analysis ............................................................................... 21 3.9 Screening for antimicrobial activity ....................................................................... 21 3.9.1 Primary antimicrobial screening ...................................................................... 21 3.9.2 Secondary antimicrobial screening .................................................................. 22 CHAPTER FOUR .......................................................................................................... 24 RESULTS ....................................................................................................................... 24 4.1 Sampling ................................................................................................................. 24 4.1.1 Physicochemical characteristics ...................................................................... 24 ...................................................................................................................................... 24 4.2 Fungal isolation ...................................................................................................... 25 4.3 Morphological characterization of the isolated fungi ............................................. 25 4.3.1 Colony morphology ......................................................................................... 25 4.3.2 Cell morphology .............................................................................................. 25 4.4 Physiological characterization of the isolates......................................................... 30 4.4.1 Salt Tolerance .................................................................................................. 30 4.4.2 pH Tolerance.................................................................................................... 31 4.4.3 Temperature Tolerance .................................................................................... 31 4.5 Biochemical Characterization
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Inventory and Review of Quantitative Models for Spread of Plant Pests for Use in Pest Risk Assessment for the EU Territory1
    EFSA supporting publication 2015:EN-795 EXTERNAL SCIENTIFIC REPORT Inventory and review of quantitative models for spread of plant pests for use in pest risk assessment for the EU territory1 NERC Centre for Ecology and Hydrology 2 Maclean Building, Benson Lane, Crowmarsh Gifford, Wallingford, OX10 8BB, UK ABSTRACT This report considers the prospects for increasing the use of quantitative models for plant pest spread and dispersal in EFSA Plant Health risk assessments. The agreed major aims were to provide an overview of current modelling approaches and their strengths and weaknesses for risk assessment, and to develop and test a system for risk assessors to select appropriate models for application. First, we conducted an extensive literature review, based on protocols developed for systematic reviews. The review located 468 models for plant pest spread and dispersal and these were entered into a searchable and secure Electronic Model Inventory database. A cluster analysis on how these models were formulated allowed us to identify eight distinct major modelling strategies that were differentiated by the types of pests they were used for and the ways in which they were parameterised and analysed. These strategies varied in their strengths and weaknesses, meaning that no single approach was the most useful for all elements of risk assessment. Therefore we developed a Decision Support Scheme (DSS) to guide model selection. The DSS identifies the most appropriate strategies by weighing up the goals of risk assessment and constraints imposed by lack of data or expertise. Searching and filtering the Electronic Model Inventory then allows the assessor to locate specific models within those strategies that can be applied.
    [Show full text]
  • The Identity of Phyllosticta Destructiva Desm. and Similar Phoma-Like Fungi Described from Malvaceae and Lycium Halimifolium
    The identity of Phyllosticta destructiva Desm. and similar Phoma-like Fungi described from Malvaceae and Lycium halimifolium H.A. van der Aa and H.A. van Kesteren Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures, Baarn, and PlantenziektenkundigeDienst, Wageningen. SUMMARY examination of By comparative type specimens and freshly collected material,and pure cultures and by inoculation experiments, it was shown that Phyllosticta destructiva 1 and numerous other Phoma-like fungi described on Malvaceae and Lycium halimifolium are identical with the übiquitousweak and wound parasite Phoma exigua Desm. 1. INTRODUCTION In 1847 Desmazieres described Phyllosticta destructiva as a member of the Sphaeropsidales with “sporidiis minutis ovoideo-oblongis, subhyalinis, 1-2 sep- tatis”. This fungus was found on Malva species (Phyllosticta destructiva var. malvarum) and on Lycium species (van lycii) and was therefore considered to be the the a polyphagous species. According to type specimen (Herb. PC) and distributedexsiccata in PI. cryptog. N. France [ed. 1] Fasc. 33, No. 1627. 1847 of Phyllosticta destructiva on Malva sylvestris and Lycium halimifolium (sub syn. the be characterized L. europaeum) spores now can as 1-, 2-, or occasionally 3-celled, (2.5)5-10(13) X (1.5)2-4 p, in size. This species concept does not fit in Saccardo’s Sphaerioideae-hyalosporae. In his system (1884) the most impor- tant characters for separating genera and species were septation of the spores, identity of the host and the part ofthe plant on which the fungus occurred. This was the reason why subsequent authors described differentspecies of Ascochyta, and Malvaceae Diplodina, Phoma, Phyllosticta on and on Lycium halimifolium similar to Phyllosticta destructiva and ignored the existence and priority of this last name.
    [Show full text]
  • Ohio Plant Disease Index
    Special Circular 128 December 1989 Ohio Plant Disease Index The Ohio State University Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center Wooster, Ohio This page intentionally blank. Special Circular 128 December 1989 Ohio Plant Disease Index C. Wayne Ellett Department of Plant Pathology The Ohio State University Columbus, Ohio T · H · E OHIO ISJATE ! UNIVERSITY OARilL Kirklyn M. Kerr Director The Ohio State University Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center Wooster, Ohio All publications of the Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center are available to all potential dientele on a nondiscriminatory basis without regard to race, color, creed, religion, sexual orientation, national origin, sex, age, handicap, or Vietnam-era veteran status. 12-89-750 This page intentionally blank. Foreword The Ohio Plant Disease Index is the first step in develop­ Prof. Ellett has had considerable experience in the ing an authoritative and comprehensive compilation of plant diagnosis of Ohio plant diseases, and his scholarly approach diseases known to occur in the state of Ohia Prof. C. Wayne in preparing the index received the acclaim and support .of Ellett had worked diligently on the preparation of the first the plant pathology faculty at The Ohio State University. edition of the Ohio Plant Disease Index since his retirement This first edition stands as a remarkable ad substantial con­ as Professor Emeritus in 1981. The magnitude of the task tribution by Prof. Ellett. The index will serve us well as the is illustrated by the cataloguing of more than 3,600 entries complete reference for Ohio for many years to come. of recorded diseases on approximately 1,230 host or plant species in 124 families.
    [Show full text]
  • A Polyphasic Approach to Characterise Phoma and Related Pleosporalean Genera
    available online at www.studiesinmycology.org StudieS in Mycology 65: 1–60. 2010. doi:10.3114/sim.2010.65.01 Highlights of the Didymellaceae: A polyphasic approach to characterise Phoma and related pleosporalean genera M.M. Aveskamp1, 3*#, J. de Gruyter1, 2, J.H.C. Woudenberg1, G.J.M. Verkley1 and P.W. Crous1, 3 1CBS-KNAW Fungal Biodiversity Centre, Uppsalalaan 8, 3584 CT Utrecht, The Netherlands; 2Dutch Plant Protection Service (PD), Geertjesweg 15, 6706 EA Wageningen, The Netherlands; 3Wageningen University and Research Centre (WUR), Laboratory of Phytopathology, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6708 PB Wageningen, The Netherlands *Correspondence: Maikel M. Aveskamp, [email protected] #Current address: Mycolim BV, Veld Oostenrijk 13, 5961 NV Horst, The Netherlands Abstract: Fungal taxonomists routinely encounter problems when dealing with asexual fungal species due to poly- and paraphyletic generic phylogenies, and unclear species boundaries. These problems are aptly illustrated in the genus Phoma. This phytopathologically significant fungal genus is currently subdivided into nine sections which are mainly based on a single or just a few morphological characters. However, this subdivision is ambiguous as several of the section-specific characters can occur within a single species. In addition, many teleomorph genera have been linked to Phoma, three of which are recognised here. In this study it is attempted to delineate generic boundaries, and to come to a generic circumscription which is more correct from an evolutionary point of view by means of multilocus sequence typing. Therefore, multiple analyses were conducted utilising sequences obtained from 28S nrDNA (Large Subunit - LSU), 18S nrDNA (Small Subunit - SSU), the Internal Transcribed Spacer regions 1 & 2 and 5.8S nrDNA (ITS), and part of the β-tubulin (TUB) gene region.
    [Show full text]
  • Phoma Destructiva Causing Blight of Tomato Plants: a New Fungal Threat for Tomato Plantations in Brazil?
    Trop. plant pathol. (2018) 43:257–262 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40858-017-0200-2 SHORT COMMUNICATION Phoma destructiva causing blight of tomato plants: a new fungal threat for tomato plantations in Brazil? Adans A. Colmán1 & Janaina L. Alves1 & Meiriele da Silva1 & Robert W. Barreto1 Received: 17 July 2017 /Accepted: 24 October 2017 /Published online: 20 November 2017 # Sociedade Brasileira de Fitopatologia 2017 Abstract Solanum lycopersicum is among the most impor- Solanum lycopersicum (Solanaceae) is one of the most impor- tant crops in Brazil. This crop is affected by a large range of tant and broadly grown vegetables in the world. Brazil is fungal diseases that are recognized as major limitations for among the major producers of tomato worldwide (Vale et al. tomato production. Recently, plants grown in a greenhouse 2007). A large range of fungal and oomycete diseases affect in Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil, were found to bear severe tomato (Jones et al. 2014; Lopes and Ávila 2005), some of blight symptoms. A pycnidial coelomycete was repeatedly which are universally regarded as major threats to tomato found in association with necrotic tissues. The fungus had its production, such as early blight, caused by Alternaria spp., morphology recognized as equivalent to that of Phoma and and late blight, caused by Phytophthora infestans. Others, related genera. A phylogenetic analysis based on nrDNA such as Phoma rot, are considered as having less relevance. (ITS) and partial β-tubulin (TUB) sequences led to the con- In Brazil, this disease is considered to be of secondary impor- clusion that the fungus involved was Phoma destructiva.
    [Show full text]
  • A Worldwide List of Endophytic Fungi with Notes on Ecology and Diversity
    Mycosphere 10(1): 798–1079 (2019) www.mycosphere.org ISSN 2077 7019 Article Doi 10.5943/mycosphere/10/1/19 A worldwide list of endophytic fungi with notes on ecology and diversity Rashmi M, Kushveer JS and Sarma VV* Fungal Biotechnology Lab, Department of Biotechnology, School of Life Sciences, Pondicherry University, Kalapet, Pondicherry 605014, Puducherry, India Rashmi M, Kushveer JS, Sarma VV 2019 – A worldwide list of endophytic fungi with notes on ecology and diversity. Mycosphere 10(1), 798–1079, Doi 10.5943/mycosphere/10/1/19 Abstract Endophytic fungi are symptomless internal inhabits of plant tissues. They are implicated in the production of antibiotic and other compounds of therapeutic importance. Ecologically they provide several benefits to plants, including protection from plant pathogens. There have been numerous studies on the biodiversity and ecology of endophytic fungi. Some taxa dominate and occur frequently when compared to others due to adaptations or capabilities to produce different primary and secondary metabolites. It is therefore of interest to examine different fungal species and major taxonomic groups to which these fungi belong for bioactive compound production. In the present paper a list of endophytes based on the available literature is reported. More than 800 genera have been reported worldwide. Dominant genera are Alternaria, Aspergillus, Colletotrichum, Fusarium, Penicillium, and Phoma. Most endophyte studies have been on angiosperms followed by gymnosperms. Among the different substrates, leaf endophytes have been studied and analyzed in more detail when compared to other parts. Most investigations are from Asian countries such as China, India, European countries such as Germany, Spain and the UK in addition to major contributions from Brazil and the USA.
    [Show full text]
  • Tomato Disease Tomato Field Guide Field
    TOMATO DISEASE TOMATO DISEASE FIELD GUIDE DISEASE TOMATO FIELD GUIDE 1 TOMATO DISEASE FIELD GUIDE PREFACE This guide provides descriptions and photographs of the more common tomato diseases and disorders worldwide. For each disease and disorder the reader will find the common name, causal agent, distribution, symptoms, conditions for disease development and control measures. We have also included a section on common vectors of tomato viruses. New to this guide are several bacterial, virus and viroid descriptions as well as several tomato disorders. The photographs illustrate characteristic symptoms of the diseases and disorders included in this guide. It is important to note, however, that many factors can influence the appearance and severity of symptoms. Many of the photographs are new to this guide. We are grateful to the many academic and private industry individuals who contributed photographs for this guide. The primary audience for this guide includes tomato crop producers, agricultural advisors, private consultants, farm managers, agronomists, food processors, and members of the chemical and vegetable seed industries. This guide should be used as a reference for information about common diseases and disorders as well as their control. However, diagnosis of these diseases and disorders using only this guide is not recommended nor encouraged, and it is not intended to be substituted for the professional opinion of a producer, grower, agronomist, plant pathologist or other professionals involved in the production of tomato crops. Even the most experienced plant pathologist relies upon laboratory and greenhouse techniques to confirm a plant disease and/or disease disorder diagnosis. Moreover, this guide is by no means inclusive of every tomato disease.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterising Plant Pathogen Communities and Their Environmental Drivers at a National Scale
    Lincoln University Digital Thesis Copyright Statement The digital copy of this thesis is protected by the Copyright Act 1994 (New Zealand). This thesis may be consulted by you, provided you comply with the provisions of the Act and the following conditions of use: you will use the copy only for the purposes of research or private study you will recognise the author's right to be identified as the author of the thesis and due acknowledgement will be made to the author where appropriate you will obtain the author's permission before publishing any material from the thesis. Characterising plant pathogen communities and their environmental drivers at a national scale A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy at Lincoln University by Andreas Makiola Lincoln University, New Zealand 2019 General abstract Plant pathogens play a critical role for global food security, conservation of natural ecosystems and future resilience and sustainability of ecosystem services in general. Thus, it is crucial to understand the large-scale processes that shape plant pathogen communities. The recent drop in DNA sequencing costs offers, for the first time, the opportunity to study multiple plant pathogens simultaneously in their naturally occurring environment effectively at large scale. In this thesis, my aims were (1) to employ next-generation sequencing (NGS) based metabarcoding for the detection and identification of plant pathogens at the ecosystem scale in New Zealand, (2) to characterise plant pathogen communities, and (3) to determine the environmental drivers of these communities. First, I investigated the suitability of NGS for the detection, identification and quantification of plant pathogens using rust fungi as a model system.
    [Show full text]
  • Product: 366 - Molds, Rusts and Smuts, Absidia Ramosa
    Product: 366 - Molds, Rusts and Smuts, Absidia ramosa Manufacturers of this Product Antigen Laboratories, Inc. - Liberty, MO (Lic. No. 468, STN No. 102223) Search Strategy PubMed: absidia and hypersensitivity; absidia and allergy; absidia ramosa; absidia corymbifera allergy Google: absidia ramosa allergy; absidia ramosa allergy adverse; absidia ramosa allergen; absidia ramosa allergen adverse Nomenclature ATCC website: Absidia ramosa (Lindt) Lendner, teleomorph deposited as Tieghemella italiana (Costantin et Perin) Naumov, teleomorph. Stedmans Book (ATCC Fungus Names, 1993): Absidia corymbifera (Cohn) Saccardo et Trotter,1912. Index Fungorum website: Absidia ramosa (Zopf) Lendn., Mat. fl. crypt. Suisse 3(1): 144 (1908) & Lichtheimia ramosa (Zopf) Vuill., Bull. Soc. mycol. Fr. 19: 126 (1903). Parent Product 366 - Molds, Rusts and Smuts, Absidia ramosa Published Data No supportive data were identified. A. ramosais is an organism associated with mucormycosis and farmers' lung. These are hypersensitivity reactions and do not affect the safety of the extract. Panels: Original Panel Recommendation Reclassification Panel Recommendation Diagnosis: none none Therapy: none none Page 1 of 180 9/9/2011 Product: 367 - Molds, Rusts and Smuts, Achorion (Trichophyton) schoenleinii Recommended Scientific Name Trichophyton schoenleinii Manufacturers of this Product Antigen Laboratories, Inc. - Liberty, MO (Lic. No. 468, STN No. 102223) Search Strategy PubMed: trichophyton schoenleinii and allergy (or allergen); trichophyton schoenleinii Google: trichophyton schoenleinii allergy; trichophyton schoenleinii allergy adverse; trichophyton schoenleinii allergen; trichophyton schoenleinii allergen adverse Nomenclature ATCC website: Trichophyton schoenleinii (Lebert) Langeron et Milochevitch, anamorph deposited as Achorion schoenleinii Remak ex Gueguen, anamorph. Stedmans Book (ATCC Fungus Names, 1993): Trichophyton schoenleinii (Lebert) Langeron et Milochevitch Index Fungorum website: Trichophyton schoenleinii (Lebert) Langeron & Miloch.
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of the Fungal Rot of Tomato Abstract Introduction
    Mycopath (2011) 9(1): 33-38 An overview of the fungal rot of tomato A. H. Wani Section of Mycology and Plant Pathology, Department of Botany University of Kashmir 190006, India *Correspondence E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum L.) is the most popular vegetable world-wide. Tomatoes crop and yield is suffered every year due to number of pathogenic diseases. Such diseases are caused by fungi, bacteria, viruses and nematode, develop through soil-borne, above-ground infections and in some instances are transmitted through insect feeding. Although some general review on the fungal diseases of vegetables have been compiled by different workers. However, no comprehensive review is available on the fungal rot of tomato. The present review gives inclusive information regarding various pathological aspects on the fungal rot of tomato and management strategies opted for post harvest diseases of tomato. Keywords: Review, Fungi, Rot, Tomato, Morphology, Fungicides. Introduction Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) symptomology, severity/incidence, pathogenicity, originated South America belongs to Solanaceae losses and disease control with fungicides. family is a widely grown vegetable in the world. Alternaria rot has been considered as the The leading producer of tomato in the world is most common disease of tomato fruits and causes USA followed by China, Italy, Turkey, Egypt, heavy losses in quality of the fruits, thus rendering Spain, Romania, Brazil and Greece. In Kashmir large quantity of tomato fruits unfit for Valley (India), the crop is grown over an area of consumption. The disease was reported by 1200 hectares with an average yield of 250-300 Douglas (1922) from the California.
    [Show full text]
  • An Unusual Phoma Stem Rot of Tomato
    FACTSHEET 06/16 An unusual Phoma stem rot of tomato Figure 1. Close-up of stem symptoms of varying severity – infection Figure 2. View of an affected length of commercial crop; note begins as small black spots and can progress to girdle and kill the lengths of affected stems separated by greener, unaffected areas whole stem An unusual tomato stem rot disease that appears to be caused by Phoma labilis and a Phoma species closely related to P. destructiva affected a few crops in southern England in 2015 and reappeared in early 2016. This factsheet provides information on tomato stem rot caused by these Phoma species and compares symptoms with those of Didymella stem canker, caused by Didymella lycopersici (asexual stage Boeremia lycopersici; previously Phoma lycopersici). Action points ● Note that Phoma labilis can cause small black ● Rectify slipped glass and water leaks to minimise spots and pale brown girdling lesions on drips onto the crop and persistent stem wetness tomato stems; check the cause if you see these ● Measures taken to minimise severity of root symptoms in a crop in case it is due to another diseases, such as corky root rot (Pyrenochaeta potentially more aggressive related fungus such lycopersici) will likely reduce the risk of Phoma as B. lycopersici (previously known as Phoma labilis spots enlarging to cause girdling lesions lycopersici; sexual stage Didymella lycopersici) that kill stems Introduction In September 2015, a Phoma species was consistently Several Phoma species have been described on tomato isolated from several tomato crops in southern England worldwide, the most frequent being Boeremia lycopersici, that showed small black spots on stems and occasionally commonly known as Didymella stem canker and fruit rot.
    [Show full text]
  • Revised Taxonomy of Phoma and Allied Genera
    Revised taxonomy of Phoma and allied genera Johannes (Hans) de Gruyter Thesis committee Promoters Prof. dr. P.W. Crous Professor of Evolutionary Phytopathology, Wageningen University Prof. dr. ir. P.J.G.M. de Wit Professor of Phytopathology, Wageningen University Other members Dr. R.T.A. Cook, Consultant Plant Pathologist, York, UK Prof. dr. T.W.M. Kuyper, Wageningen University Dr. F.T. Bakker, Wageningen University Dr. ir. A.J. Termorshuizen, BLGG AgroXpertus, Wageningen This research was conducted under the auspices of the Research School Biodiversity Revised taxonomy of Phoma and allied genera Johannes (Hans) de Gruyter Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of doctor at Wageningen University by the authority of the Rector Magnificus Prof. dr. M.J. Kropff, in the presence of the Thesis Committee appointed by the Academic Board to be defended in public on Monday 12 November 2012 at 4 p.m. in the Aula. Johannes (Hans) de Gruyter Revised taxonomy of Phoma and allied genera, 181 pages. PhD thesis Wageningen University, Wageningen, NL (2012) With references, with summaries in English and Dutch ISBN 978-94-6173-388-7 Dedicated to Gerhard Boerema † CONTENTS Chapter 1 Introduction 9 Chapter 2 Molecular phylogeny of Phoma and allied anamorph 17 genera: towards a reclassification of thePhoma complex Chapter 3 Systematic reappraisal of species in Phoma section 37 Paraphoma, Pyrenochaeta and Pleurophoma Chapter 4 Redisposition of Phoma-like anamorphs in Pleosporales 61 Chapter 5 The development of a validated real-time (TaqMan) 127 PCR for detection of Stagonosporopsis andigena and S. crystalliniformis in infected leaves of tomato and potato Chapter 6 General discussion 145 Appendix References 154 Glossary 167 Summary 170 Samenvatting 173 Dankwoord 176 Curriculum vitae 178 Education statement 179 CHAPTER 1 Introduction 9 Chapter 1 Chapter 1.
    [Show full text]