Canadian Rail A

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Canadian Rail A Canadian Rail a No. 396 JANUARY­ FEBRUARY 1987 • 25 - F eet Close d El ectr i ":: Mot or C a r No. 539 . • Com b ined Passen ger and Baa-gage Car N o. 574 . • Published bi - monthly by the Canadian Railroad Historical Association P.O. Box 148 St . Constant P. Q. JO L 1 XO . Subscription rates $25.00 ($22.00 US funds if outside Canada) ISSN 0008-4875 EDITOR: Fred F Angus CO- EDITOR: M. Peter Murphy NEW BRUNSWICK DIVISION OFFICIAL CARTOGRAPHER: William A Germaniuk P.O. Box 1162 Saint John. LAYOUT: Michel Paulet New Brunswick E2 L 4G 7 ST. LAWRENCE VALLEY DIVISION P. O. Box 22 Station ' B' Montreal. Que . H3B 3 J5 BYTOWN RAILWAY SOCIETY P.O. Box 141 . Station A Ottawa. Ontario K1 N 8 V1 TORONTO & YORK DIVISION P. O. Bo x 5849 . Terminal A. Toronto. Ontario M5 W 1 P3 WINDSOR- ESSEX DIVISION 300 Cabana Road East. Windsor. Ontario N9 G 1 A 2 GRAND RIVER DIVISION FRONT COVER: P.O . Box 603 High above the old B. C. Electric right of way, the new Cambridge. Ontario N1 R 5 W1 Sky train carries passengers sWiftly and smoothly between NIAGARA DIVISION P.O. Box 593 Vancouver and New Westminster. This view, taken on May St. Catharines. Ontario L2 R 6 W 8 27 1986, shows the B. C. Hydro line (directly beneath the RIDEAU VALLEY DIVISION second cal' of the Sky train) as well as the overhead wires for P.O. Box 962 Vancouver's trolleybusses. Smiths Falls. Ontario K 7 A 5 A 5 Photo by Mark Paul. ROCKY MOUNTAIN DIVISION P. O. Box 6102. Station C. Edmonton. Alberta T5 B 2 NO CALGARY & SOUTH WESTERN DIVISION 60 - 6100. 4th Ave. NE . Calgary. Alberta T2 A 5 Z8 INSIDE FRONT COVER: CROWSNEST & KETTLE - VALLEY DIVISION One hundred years ago the first train arrived at the newly­ P.O. Box 400 founded city of Vancouver British Columbia. Within five Cranbrook. Britis h Columbia V1 C 4 H 9 PACIFIC COAST DIVISION years an electric interurban line was in operation between that P.O. Box 1006. Station A. city and New Westminster. These wood-cut drawings of1892 Vancouver. British Columbia V6 C 2 P1 show in considerable detail the type of cars which began the KEYSTONE DIVISION service on the Westminster and Vancouver Tramway Company, 14 Reynolds Ba y the predecessor of the B. C. Electric and the ancestor of the Winnipeg. Manitoba R3 K 0 M 4 KINGSTON DIVISION Sky train which now runs over much ofthe original interurban P. O. Box 103 right of way. Kingston. Ontario K 7 M 6 P9 CA NAD IAN 6 R A L tions. It became the Ottawa & Prescott in 1855 and the St. allowing a reasonable connection to the Canadian Pacific Train Lawrence & Ottawa in 1867. After the Grand Trunk standard 80 which departed at2: 40 pm. for Smiths Falls, Carleton Place gauged its line in 1873 , both lines co-operated to provide and Ottawa. At Smiths Falls, Train 80 made connections with through sleeping car service bet ween Ottawa and Toronto. CP's Train 4, a Detroit - Montreal train which included in its The second line to reach the capital was the Brockville & consist a Chicago - Montreal sleeping car, thereby offering an Ottawa - Canada Central Railways which completed their alternative to the GTR Montreal- Chicago trains. Needless to Brockville - Carleton Place - Ottawa route in 1870. Built to say, those travelling from southern Ontario over CP were broad gauge , the system interchanged cars with the G TR until guaranteed a firm connection to the capital! the GTR standard gauged its line . Due to its poor financial To the chagrin of the GTR, CP chose that fall to reschedule position, it was not until 1880 the money was available to start Train 80 to leave Brockville at 2: 20 pm. which eliminated the standard gauging the Canada Central. connection to any GTR train. Under the new schedule, the In 1881, the syndicate which would successfully complete GTR Train 4 would arrive in Brockville at 2: 30 pm . some ten the Pacific Railway took over the faltering transcontinental minutes after the CPR train had steamed out from the north side project from the Dominion government. They early recogTlized of the Brockville station towards the nation's capital. Supposedly the importance of developing a network of lines in the the CPR would hold No. 80 for ten minutes if they were industrialized eastern portion of the nation. The earnings from informed there were passengers aboard No.6 for Ottawa. the eastern lines would generate the funds to carry the trans­ Seemingly some things never change, as the GTR train was continental line until the prairie provinces became settled and quite often more than ten minutes late which meant the CPR traffic built to renumerative levels. During the I alter portion of train was gone by the time the GTR train made its belated the 1870' s, Duncan McIntyre, a member of the syndicate, had arrival. Thus the mail from points east of Toronto often had to acquired the controlling interest in the Central Canada and in the spend the night in Brockville awaiting the first departure of a CP early 1880's in the St. Lawrence & Ottawa . The Canada train the following morning. As Train 80 was the last train of the Central, which had almost reached Mattawa in 1881 , was day to Ottawa, the unfortunate passengers had the choice of a amalgamated into the CPR that year to form part of the main line hectic eastward journey along the Grand Trunk hoping to make between Montreal and Vancouver. The western division of the connections with an Ottawa bound train at one ofthe intervening grandiloquently titled Quebec , Montreal, Ottawa & Occidental junctions or spending the night in Brockville . Railway between Montreal and Ottawa was purchased from the Detailed in the august pages of Hansard for all members of Quebec Government in 1882. With the completion of the the House of Commons to contemplate, is the tale of two groups Ontario & Quebec Railway between Smiths Falls and Toronto of travellers , who having missed the connection with the CPR , in 1884, CP had its own Montreal- Ottawa - Toronto route. set out from Brockville on the GTR to make a connection to the Recognizing that its monopoly on traffic in the Montreal­ capital. On December 4, 1907, Mr. D. Henderson, the Ottawa- Toronto area was about to be broken , the Grand Trunk member for Halton outlined his ordeal in making the trip from opened negotiations with the bondholders of the St. Lawrence& Toronto to Ottawa: Ottawa during 1882-1883. However, Mr. McIntyre remained " ... the [CP] Chicago train for Toronto was upwards strongly in control and in 1884, CP leased the St. Lawrence & of an hour and three - quarters late, [so we] preferred to go Ottawa for 999 years. While it parallelled the Canada Central, on by the Grand Trunk. We left twenty - five minutes late the lease provided CP with complete control over terminal and made up twenty minutes between [Toronto] and facilities in Ottawa and would prevent the GTR from securing Brockville. There were about eight passengers for the line to access the capital. Once CP took over the line, it Ottawa, and the conductor of the Grand Trunk train was rescheduled the passenger trains to avoid connections with the good enough to wire to Brock ville to ask them to hold the GTR at Prescott and ceased to stop at the GTR station. train, at least that he told me that he did so . .. We reached In the fall of 1907 , the Grand Trunk revised the schedule of Brockville, according to my watch, about five minutes local Train6 between Toronto and Montreal. To promote better late by the schedule time and on alighting we discovered service to the smaller communities of eastern Ontario, Train 6 the CPR had pulled out ten minutes previous to our was detained at Kingston to permit connections with Train 4, arrival. " the" Atlantic Express" a Chicago- Montreal express train . Undaunted, Mr. Henderson and his wife returned to the Passengers who boarded Train 4 west of Kingston could transfer GTR train to make the dash to Cornwall Junction where they to the express to complete their journey to Montreal thereby hoped to connect with the New York Central train to Ottawa . saving over an hour's travelling time. As well, passengers from An accident on the GTR at Cardinal prevented their train from Toronto could change to Train 6 to reach small communities in reaching Cornwall Junction. The couple had to spend the night eastern Ontario. at Prescott and complete their journey on the Prescott local the This step, which shortened trip times along the GTR's nex t morning. Montreal-Toronto main line, should have been well-received. A little more than a month later, on January 17 , 1908, Mr. Howe",r, the move adversely affected those passengers Taylor related his travails on his recent trip from his home in travellmg from points on the GTR line west of Brockville to Gananoque to Ottawa: Ottawa. Formerly, Train 6 arrived at Brockville at 2: 15 pm. " When we [Mr. Taylor, and the MP's for Brantford, CANADIAN 7 R A L This circa 1920 photo shows the Brock ville station during a lull in activity. The view is/rom the Grand Trunk side. The trains o/the Canadian Pacific operated from a pocket track at the rear o/the station. Photo: Canadian National. Toronto Centre, and Belleville) arrived at Brockville at another ticket from Cornwall to Coteau.
Recommended publications
  • Croa 3266: Bullen, N.: Discipline Rule Violation Dismissed
    CANADIAN RAILWAY OFFICE OF ARBITRATION CASE NO. 3266 Heard in Montreal, Wednesday, 12 June, 2002 concerning VIA RAIL CANADA INC. and BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS EX PARTE DISPUTE: The 45 demerit marks assessed Locomotive Engineer N. Bullen. EX PARTE STATEMENT OF ISSUE: On November 12, 2000, Locomotive Engineers P. Kozusko and N, Bullen were assigned to train no. 45 travelling from Ottawa to Toronto. While stopped at Brockville entraining and detraining passengers, Engineer P. Kozusko was at the controls of the locomotive and Engineer Bullen was on the platform. Following the completion of the station work the locomotive passed signal 1257N1 indicating stop located at the west end of the platform. The incident was reported and an investigation was held. Both engineers were heavily disciplined as a result. The Brotherhood appeals the discipline assessed to Engineer Bullen who was not on the locomotive at the time of the incident. FOR THE BROTHERHOOD: (SGD.) J. R. TOFFLEMIRE GENERAL CHAIRMAN There appeared on behalf of the Corporation: E. J. Houlihan – Senior Manager, Labour Relations, Montreal G. Benn – Officer, Labour Relations, Montreal G. Selesnic – Manager, Customer Services And on behalf of the Brotherhood: J. R. Tofflemire – General Chairman, Oakville M. Grieve – Local Chairman, Toronto CROA 3266 AWARD OF THE ARBITRATOR The material before the Arbitrator confirms that while operating Train No. 45 from Ottawa to Toronto on November 12, 2000 Locomotive Engineers Bullen and Kozusko made a regular scheduled stop at Brockville. As they entered the Brockville station they stopped at the station platform facing signal 1257N1 on the Kingston Subdivision. In accordance with normal procedure, once the passengers had been detrained and entrained, Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of the 2018 – 2022 Corporate Plan and 2018 Operating and Capital Budgets
    p SUMMARY OF THE 2018 – 2022 CORPORATE PLAN AND 2018 OPERATING AND CAPITAL BUDGETS SUMMARY OF THE 2018-2022 CORPORATE PLAN / 1 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................. 5 MANDATE ...................................................................................................................................... 14 CORPORATE MISSION, OBJECTIVES, PROFILE AND GOVERNANCE ................................................... 14 2.1 Corporate Objectives and Profile ............................................................................................ 14 2.2 Governance and Accountability .............................................................................................. 14 2.2.1 Board of Directors .......................................................................................................... 14 2.2.2 Travel Policy Guidelines and Reporting ........................................................................... 17 2.2.3 Audit Regime .................................................................................................................. 17 2.2.4 Office of the Auditor General: Special Examination Results ............................................. 17 2.2.5 Canada Transportation Act Review ................................................................................. 18 2.3 Overview of VIA Rail’s Business .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of the 2017 – 2021 Corporate Plan and 2017 Operating and Capital Budgets
    SUMMARY OF THE 2017 – 2021 CORPORATE PLAN AND 2017 OPERATING AND CAPITAL BUDGETS 2017-2021 SUMMARY OF THE CORPORATE PLAN / 1 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................. 5 1. MANDATE ............................................................................................................................................ 15 2. CORPORATE MISSION, OBJECTIVES, PROFILE AND GOVERNANCE ..................................................... 15 2.1 Corporate Objectives and Profile ................................................................................................ 15 2.2 Governance and Accountability .................................................................................................. 15 2.2.1 Board of Directors ............................................................................................................... 15 2.2.2 Train Services Network Changes ......................................................................................... 17 2.2.3 Travel Policy Guidelines and Reporting .............................................................................. 18 2.2.4 Audit Regime ....................................................................................................................... 18 2.2.5 Office of the Auditor General: Special Examination Results ............................................... 18 2.2.6 Canada Transportation Act Review ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Local Railway Items from Ottawa Papers - 2011
    Local Railway Items from Ottawa Papers - 2011 Wednesday 05/01/2011 Kingston Daily British Whi Kingston (CN) Station lease deal derails The roof on the old Montreal Street railway station is caved in -- and so has a deal to lease the crumbling heritage building for commercial use.CN Railway spokesman Jim Feeny confirmed yesterday there is "no prospect at the moment" for a deal it had hoped to sign for a commercial development. Instead, CN Railway, the prop-e rty owner, and the City of Kingston will face off in court later this month. The city is trying to uphold a work order that would force the railroad to stabilize the structure before it falls down completely. Because this is a second possible offence -- the city successfully prosecuted CN about 10 years ago -- the company now faces a possible penalty of $200,000. "We generally would request a fine but also to have the property standards upheld, to have it fixed by a particular date," said city building department manager Steve Murphy. "We've charged them for not bringing it back in compliance. The case has been postponed a couple of times. Our goal is not to get a fine but to have the building preserved." Feeny said CN's focus now is on stabilizing the building. "We had an engineering inspection done," he said. "There's nothing been established about what its use might be. In the next few days we should be in a position to talk about what we will do." Any work on the building must be approved by the federal Historic Sites and Monuments Board of Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • The Monitor Volume 27, Issue 3 December 2011
    The Monitor Volume 27, Issue 3 December 2011 memorable day, Mr. Phelps, who had left Burlington on Inside this issue: Travellers’ Lament at a trip to Boston, found that having mixed up the trains at An Open letter to the Friends 3 Brockville~ Part 1 Essex Junction, he was back on the “Shuttle” returning Director’s Message 4 By Douglas N.W. Smith to Burlington. Giving full vent to his frustrations, Mr. Education Programming 5 In the latter portion of the Phelps ended the last two verses of his poem with the A Glimpse at Christmas around the World 6 nineteenth century, the Hon- following immortal lines: What’s New 6 ourable Edward J. Phelps “I hope in hell, Volunteers 6 composed a piece of dogger- His soul may dwell, Friends of the Brockville Museum 7 el, entitled “The Lay of the Who first invented Essex Junction.” Exhibits 7 Lost Traveller”, lamenting Our Year at a Glance 8 the fate of the passenger These lines formed an epitaph for all railway pa- whose attempt to change trons whose journey included a change of trains at the Calendar of Events 9 trains at Essex Junction, myriad of railway junctions in North America. While it did not become as famous as Essex Junction, in 1907 Brockville was celebrated as a point to bring despair to the traveller desiring to transfer from the Grand Trunk to a Canadian Pacific train. Rather than compose a rhyme for the popular press, George Taylor, MP for Leeds, took his complaint to the House of Commons where his complaint was recorded in the pages of Han- sard.
    [Show full text]
  • Key Lock & Lantern News
    KEY LOCK & LANTERN Jul/Aug 2014 NEWS Issue No.28 The Bi-Monthly Digital Supplement to Key Lock & Lantern Magazine Key Lock & Lantern 2014 Convention Spring Brookline North Creek to Host Nickel Plate 765 Railroadiana Auction Annual Rail Fair Event Excursion Schedule Key, Lock & Lantern A non-profit membership KEY LOCK & LANTERN corporation dedicated to the preservation of transportation history and railroad memorabilia The mission of Key, Lock & Lantern is to gather and publish information on the NEWS history of the transportation industry, The Bi-Monthly Digital Supplement to Key Lock & Lantern Magazine and to support the preservation of railroad artifacts. KL&L members have WWW.KLNL.ORG an interest in all aspects of railroad & transportation history, from research and Jul/Aug 2014 Issue #28 preservation projects to the conservation and restoration of all types of historical From the President’s Desk ..........................................................3 memorabilia. Originally formed in 1966, Key, Lock & Lantern, Inc. was officially Railroad Event Calendar...............................................................3 incorporated in 1988 as a non-profit, educational, membership corporation 2014 Key Lock & Lantern Convention.........................................4 in the State of New Jersey, under the North Creek to Host Annual Rail Fair...........................................6 provisions of Section 501(c)(3) of the United States Internal Revenue Code. Spring Brookline Railroadiana Auction......................................8
    [Show full text]
  • Transport Action Newsletter
    July 2015 5 Transport Action 36-2 More News from Transport Action Canada Appointments of Officers and Volunteer Roles Ottawa's Trillium Line - A Personal View Ben Novak P.Eng., MCP, Dip. BA Under the new Canada Not for Profit Corporations Act, the board of directors, (elected at our Annual General Meeting on Recently the City of Ottawa spend a considerable amount May 9th), appoints the executive officers, at its first meeting. (some $60Million) on the only rail rapid transit facility presently in operation in Ottawa, to enhance capacity and At the board teleconference on May 26th, appointments were: frequency. This entailed adding passing tracks and also president - Harry Gow, Saint-Antoine-sur-Richelieu, QC; changing the rolling stock. I had to see for myself. secretary - Anton Turrittin, Toronto, ON; treasurer - David Jeanes, Ottawa, ON; VP east - Marcus Garnet, Dartmouth, NS; A little background first. The original Trillium Line went from VP west - Peter Lacey, Winnipeg, MB. The past president is a the Bayview area South to Greenboro, along a disused CPR voting member of the executive, so David Jeanes declined to track, which the City had acquired. There are many such serve in two positions and the board asked a previous disused tracks or rights of way in Canadian cities. More on president, David Glastonbury, Ottawa, ON, to fill this role. that will be said later. It was then called the O-Train and travelled some 8 km south from the existing east-west BRT The board approved changes to bank signing officers. Since System (Bus Rapid Transit), tying into it slightly west of the the unexpected death of our volunteer office manager Bert city center.
    [Show full text]
  • Transport Action Newsletter – Vol. 37, No. 1
    TRANSPORT ACTION NEWSLETTER Volume 37 no 1 — February 2016 IN THIS ISSUE MANITObA Forty years ! ransport Action Canada celebrates in public and would need to be well organ- forty years of public transport ac- ized to give us credibility. Transport 2000 tivism in 2016. On February 3rd, was making some headway in defending and 1976, a dozen or so young profes- promoting railways in the United Kingdom, Tsionals in various disciplines and trades met and I had seen a news item about one Ed Ab- Land of opportunities at the apartment of Doug Stoltz in Ottawa’s bot, the dynamic chair of the Canadian Rail- Page 4 Glebe district to talk about how to respond way Labour Association, speaking in favour to the call by then federal Transport Minister of passenger trains. Out of a discussion with Otto Lang for hearings on the "rationaliza- him arose an idea to contact Transport 2000 ALbERTA tion" of the transcontinental railway passen- through ASLEF, a British Railway trade union ger train network. The meeting quickly got involved in Transport 2000, and that got us down to brass tacks. After an explanation of permission to use the name. That was very the hearings' legal and regulatory framework useful as we could present ourselves as part of by attendees expert in such matters, those an international movement, and we got some present appointed the writer as chair and good position papers on transport to hand out, decided to produce a substantial brief for the as well as letterhead and membership cards to Canadian Transportation Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Railway Items from Area Papers
    Local Railway Items from Area Papers - Kingston (CN) subdivision 13/02/1851 Brockville Recorder Kingston (CN) A number of delegates from places favorable to a grand Provincial Railroad from Toronto to Montreal met in the Council Chamber at Kingston, Monday, week. The room was filled with citizens and strangers who attended each of the three days the convention was in session. On the second day, Mr. Keefer took his seat as a delagate from the Montreal and Lachine Railroad Company and J.L. McDonald as delegate from Gaganoque. On a motion of Dr. Beatty, resolved that the Mayors and Wardens of each municipality on the line shall form a committee, making in all nine members. Resolved that the provisional committee shall meet in Cobourg. Resolved that the different municipalities shall appropriate £50 each to meet the expenses of the survey. A public dinner took place in honor of the convention. It appears that the proposal to send a delegation .. Was negatived in the Council of Leeds and Grenville by a majority of four. 14/07/1855 Brockville Recorder Kingston (CN) Brockville A locomotive and ballast cars reached Brockville over the Grand Trunk Railway to open rail communications with Montreal. 09/11/1855 The Tribune, Ottawa Kingston (CN) Brockville Grand Trunk Railway. We understand that this railway will be opened for traffic to Brockville on 19th inst. The inhabitants of this city will then be able to reach Montreal in a few hours. 30/11/1855 Perth Courier Kingston (CN) On Saturday 17th last, the Grand Trunk Railway was opened from Montreal to Brockville.
    [Show full text]
  • Line by Mileage
    Kingston (CN) - By mileage MileageLocation Date Number Notes 37.85Coteau 07/05/1918 27190 GTR is required to make connection between its eastbound passenger trains due to leave Cornwall at 4.15 and 4.45 pm arriving at Coteau Junction at 5.18 and 5.30 pm respectively and the train due to leave Montreal at 5.00 pm and now due at Coteau Junction at 6.00 pm and arriving at Ottawa at 8.45 pm. Rescinded by 28481. 05/05/1955 86141 Authorizes CNR to make changes to the interlocker at Coteau. 08/03/1967 123678 CNR authorized to make changes to the signals on their Kingston sub. between m. 11.0 and m. 54.0. 24/09/1968 R-3428 Approves CNR plan showing signals between m. 11.0 and m. 40.0. 22/05/1984 R-36698 CNR authorized to make changes to the block signal system between m. 25.0 and m. 40.0. 39.3St Catherine Road West 19/07/1963 111714 CNR authorized to make changes to crossing protection at m. 39.3. 39.7 07/07/1971 R-12135 CNR exempted from provision of 53 (1) of G.O. E-14 at switches at m. 39.7 and 69.4 provided no engine or train clears the main track at these locations. 39.72St. Zotique Creek 02/04/1914 21593 GTR authorized to construct Bridge No. 287. 39.8Sainte-Zotique River 07/10/1986 R-39847 CNR authorized to remove the bridge and replace it with 3 1400mm diameter corrugated metal pipes and may operate trains during and after the performance of the work.
    [Show full text]
  • VIA Rail's 2017 ANNUAL PUBLIC MEETING – QUESTIONS and ANSWERS
    2017 ANNUAL PUBLIC MEETING – QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS The below document contains all questions sent to VIA Rail leading up to and during the 2017 Annual Public Meeting webcast. Thank you to everyone who participated in the meeting and sent us their questions. Please note that questions of the same nature have been grouped together. Grammar and syntax of the questions received have been corrected. VIA Préférence 1. Is there any interest in reforming the VIA Préférence system? Relative to the airlines, the benefits are extremely basic, the point thresholds for redemption are high, and the system is very inflexible. VIA Rail is continually looking to improve and evolve the VIA Préférence program. The VIA Préférence program has a very competitive offer compared to other loyalty programs in terms of generosity (the “return on spend”) and has fewer restrictions (e.g., capacity control on redemption seats, blackout periods) than airline loyalty programs. 2. I am a senior and enjoy traveling VIA Rail to Nova Scotia. We use the points when we can, but the system of points accumulation takes too long to be viable, especially for seniors. Are you updating so seniors can accrue and use the points more easily? We are not planning to make changes to the program that are specific to seniors. 3. Why can't you offer Privilege members a little leeway when a ticket change is required? We would encourage travellers who require greater flexibility of travelling to book Economy Plus or Business Plus tickets, which are fully refundable and exchangeable. 4. Why do Premier members not have access to the Business lounge? Due to lounge capacity and the number of visitors, VIA Préférence Premier members enjoy access to VIA Rail’s Business Lounges only when travelling in Business class or with an Economy Plus fare ticket.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Annual Public Meeting – Questions and Answers
    2017 ANNUAL PUBLIC MEETING – QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS The below document contains all questions sent to VIA Rail leading up to and during the 2017 Annual Public Meeting webcast. Thank you to everyone who participated in the meeting and sent us their questions. Please note that questions of the same nature have been grouped together. Grammar and syntax of the questions received have been corrected. VIA Préférence 1. Is there any interest in reforming the VIA Préférence system? Relative to the airlines, the benefits are extremely basic, the point thresholds for redemption are high, and the system is very inflexible. VIA Rail is continually looking to improve and evolve the VIA Préférence program. The VIA Préférence program has a very competitive offer compared to other loyalty programs in terms of generosity (the “return on spend”) and has fewer restrictions (e.g., capacity control on redemption seats, blackout periods) than airline loyalty programs. 2. I am a senior and enjoy traveling VIA Rail to Nova Scotia. We use the points when we can, but the system of points accumulation takes too long to be viable, especially for seniors. Are you updating so seniors can accrue and use the points more easily? We are not planning to make changes to the program that are specific to seniors. 3. Why can't you offer Privilege members a little leeway when a ticket change is required? We would encourage travellers who require greater flexibility of travelling to book Economy Plus or Business Plus tickets, which are fully refundable and exchangeable. 4. Why do Premier members not have access to the Business lounge? Due to lounge capacity and the number of visitors, VIA Préférence Premier members enjoy access to VIA Rail’s Business Lounges only when travelling in Business class or with an Economy Plus fare ticket.
    [Show full text]