DOCSLIB.ORG

Escribe Agenda Package

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Notice and Agenda Joint Services Committee of Leeds and Grenville Wednesday, September 9, 2020 9:00 a.m. Council Chambers 25 Central Avenue West, Brockville, Ontario Pages 1. Call to Order 2. Adoption of the Agenda 3. Disclosure of Pecuniary Interest and General Nature Thereof 4. Adoption of the Minutes of the Previous Meeting 4.1 Meeting Minutes Dated July 8, 2020 1 - 10 5. Delegations/Presentations - Nil 6. Correspondence, Communications and Petitions - Nil 7. Information Items 7.1 Certificate of Appreciation to the Leeds Grenville Paramedic Service from 11 - 11 MPP Steve Clark 8. Staff Reports 8.1 Housing and Social Services 8.1.1 Report No. JSC-028-2020: Program and Service Delivery Activity 12 - 21 Community and Social Services 8.1.2 Report No. JSC-029-2020: Annual Housing and Homelessness Plan 22 - 34 Public Report 8.1.3 Report No. JSC-034-2020: Temporary Social Distancing Shelter 35 - 53 8.1.4 Report No. JSC-035-2020: Social Services Relief Fund (SSRF) - 54 - 56 Phase 2 8.2 Paramedic Service 8.2.1 Report No. JSC-033-2020: Land Ambulance Services Grant 57 - 64 Funding 8.2.2 Report No. JSC-032-2020: 2020 Second Quarter Statistical Report 65 - 76 Paramedic Service 8.3 P.O.A. - Nil 8.4 All Services 8.4.1 Report No. JSC-030-2020: Operating Budget Projections July 2020 77 - 87 8.4.2 Report No. JSC-031-2020: Capital Budget Projection Report July 88 - 93 2020 9. Sub-Committee, Ad Hoc Committee and Member Reports 10. Unfinished Business 10.1 CAO's Report - Joint Services Committee Requests 94 - 94 11. Announcements 12. Notice of By-law/Notice of Motion 13. Questions from the Media 14. Questions from the Public 15. Closed Meeting - Nil 16. Adjournment 2 The Joint Services Committee of Leeds and Grenville Minutes Wednesday, July 8, 2020 9:00 a.m. Tele/Video Conference – Council Chambers 25 Central Avenue West, Brockville, Ontario Members Present: Brant Burrow, Chair (In Chambers) Pat Sayeau, Warden (In Chambers) Video Conference: Roger Haley, Arie Hoogenboom, Robin Jones, Doug Malanka, Nancy Peckford, Corinna Smith-Gatcke, Doug Struthers, United Counties of Leeds and Grenville Jason Baker, City of Brockville (Video Conference) Brett Todd, Town of Prescott (Video Conference) Ted Lojko, Town of Gananoque (Video Conference) Staff Present: Andy Brown, Chief Administrative Officer (Video Conference) Alison Tutak, Director of Community and Social Services (Video Conference) Jeff Carss, Paramedic Chief (Video Conference) Pat Huffman, Treasurer (Video Conference) Chris Morrison, Manager of Social Housing (Video Conference) Lesley Todd, Clerk (In Chambers) Sheena Earl, Deputy Clerk (Video Conference) Andrea Bolton, Deputy Clerk (Recording Secretary) (In Chambers) 1. Call to Order The Chair called the Joint Services Committee meeting to order at 9:07 a.m. 2. Adoption of the Agenda Resolution No. JSC-025-2020 Moved by Arie Hoogenboom Seconded by Jason Baker 1 Joint Services Committee Meeting Minutes July 8, 2020 THAT the Agenda for the July 8, 2020 meeting of the Joint Services Committee be adopted as circulated. CARRIED 3. Disclosure of Pecuniary Interest and General Nature Thereof - Nil 4. Adoption of the Minutes of the Previous Meeting 4.1 Meeting Minutes Dated June 10, 2020 Resolution No. JSC-026-2020 Moved by Roger Haley Seconded by Doug Malanka THAT the Minutes of the Joint Services Committee Meeting held June 10, 2020 be adopted as circulated. CARRIED 5. Delegations/Presentations – Nil 6. Correspondence, Communications and Petitions – Nil 7. Information Items – Nil 8. Staff Reports 8.1 Housing and Social Services 8.1.1 Report No. JSC-022-2020: Approval of Housing and Homelessness Plan Five Year Review The Committee discussed the report, noting Leeds and Grenville is mandated by the Province to have 987 housing units to provide rent-geared-to-income housing. It was noted the Counties operates 667 of the 987 units. The 667 units 2 2 Joint Services Committee Meeting Minutes July 8, 2020 are in good repair and are meeting a need in the community. There are approximately 250 non-profit housing providers and 90 pluse are rent supplement. The Counties is currently exceeding its mandate by approximately 30 additional units due in part to the rent supplement agreement with the Marguerita Residence Corporation. The Committee noted rent supplement agreements are more flexible to manage than units owned by the Counties; however, owning and operating the units allows them to protect the purpose of the buildings within the community. It was noted municipalities no longer receive dedicated funds for the construction of rent-geared-to-income housing. Affordable housing can now be built through the Co-investment Fund; developers work with Canada Mortgage and Housing, who administers the program. The Committee noted the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing is pushing for new housing units in the Province. The Committee discussed the need for housing for those with physical disabilities and mental health issues and that Lanark, Leeds and Grenville Mental Health is a key partner with 400 units of different types of housing; however, the adequacy of some of the units was in question. It was noted the recent experience with the Social Distancing Centre run by Community and Social Services illustrated there is insufficient support for people with mental health and addictions issues. It was noted there is no homeless shelter, detox centre or sexual assault centre in Leeds and Grenville. Ms. Peckford stated she has spoken with Minister Clark about a mobile sexual assault centre. Mr. Baker noted the Committee should not make the assumption that the large urban centres are where the shelters need to be located. He said with benefits come hard costs and he would like to be at the table when this is discussed. The Committee looked at housing needs in various parts of Leeds and Grenville, noting there is a lack of housing stock in the Town of Gananoque. It was suggested one way to increase the availability of affordable housing is to work with developers with the need to involve local planners. The efforts of the Affordable Housing Task Force in North Grenville was discussed. Ms. Peckford explained they are encouraging new builds, retrofitting existing builds with granny suites and encouraging homeowners and developers when expanding housing stock. They have set a 25% affordable housing target for developers. She noted for those developers putting a granny suite in a new home, the Municipality is offsetting some of the development charges. 3 3 Joint Services Committee Meeting Minutes July 8, 2020 The Committee discussed the location of housing in Leeds and Grenville, noting that 47% of housing stock is in the City of Brockville. It was stated that for transportation reasons individuals have often located near services in the urban centres. Redistribution of housing throughout the 13 municipalities was suggested. It was also suggested that when working with developers, instead of taking a financial commitment in lieu of parkland, municipalities could request a lot, or a percentage of units be rent-geared-to-income. With respect to the report, Mr. Todd said it is not innovative enough and doesn’t address the current needs. He commended the efforts taking place in North Grenville and said he would like this matter deferred until the Committee could learn more about what is being done in North Grenville. He said he would like to see that kind of innovation at the Counties. It was noted in 2010, community housing renewal was called housing regeneration and was dedicated to examining housing stock that was 50 to 60 years old; however, there have been no dramatic rebuilding or renovation efforts in housing. It was suggested the report provides the Committee with a starting point for regeneration. Regarding the motion to recommending approval of the report to Counties Council, it was explained the draft review went to the Ministry in December of 2019 and there were no changes recommended by the Ministry. The Ministry seeks to ensure the plan is approved by the governing body, which is why the report is being submitted for the approval of the Joint Services Committee and Counties Council. Mr. Todd moved that the report be deferred. Mr. Haley seconded the motion. The Committee discussed the proposed deferral. The Committee was advised if approval of the report is deferred the Ministry will have to be notified and staff will need to find out what are next steps from the Province. The Committee debated whether or not the report prohibits a top-down approach to regeneration, or whether it represents a review of the activities of the past five years of the housing plan. It was confirmed by staff the review, if accepted, does not preclude any changes moving forward; a deferral will require the Committee to address the matter again at a future meeting. In addition, it was suggested the deferral would allow the Committee to hold a discussion, and would provide time to identify next steps. It was recommended the Committee take the opportunity to look at housing in the long-term and set an agenda. It was also 4 4 Joint Services Committee Meeting Minutes July 8, 2020 noted the report could be approved and the Committee could still pursue the issues identified at this meeting. Resolution No. JSC-027-2020 Moved by Brett Todd Seconded by Roger Haley THAT the motion to recommend to Counties Council the approval of the Housing and Homelessness Plan Five Year Review as attached to Report No. JSC-022-2020 be deferred. CARRIED Member Number of Votes Yea Nay Baker, Jason 16 16 Burrow, Brant 9 9 Haley, Roger 3 3 Hoogenboom, Arie 13 13 Jones, Robin 1 1 Lojko, Ted 4 4 Malanka, Doug 6 6 Peckford, Nancy 13 13 Sayeau, Pat 6 6 Smith-Gatcke, Corinna 10 10 Struthers, Doug 3 3 Todd, Brett 4 4 Totals 88 57 31 Resolution No.
Recommended publications
  • Croa 3266: Bullen, N.: Discipline Rule Violation Dismissed

    Croa 3266: Bullen, N.: Discipline Rule Violation Dismissed

    CANADIAN RAILWAY OFFICE OF ARBITRATION CASE NO. 3266 Heard in Montreal, Wednesday, 12 June, 2002 concerning VIA RAIL CANADA INC. and BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS EX PARTE DISPUTE: The 45 demerit marks assessed Locomotive Engineer N. Bullen. EX PARTE STATEMENT OF ISSUE: On November 12, 2000, Locomotive Engineers P. Kozusko and N, Bullen were assigned to train no. 45 travelling from Ottawa to Toronto. While stopped at Brockville entraining and detraining passengers, Engineer P. Kozusko was at the controls of the locomotive and Engineer Bullen was on the platform. Following the completion of the station work the locomotive passed signal 1257N1 indicating stop located at the west end of the platform. The incident was reported and an investigation was held. Both engineers were heavily disciplined as a result. The Brotherhood appeals the discipline assessed to Engineer Bullen who was not on the locomotive at the time of the incident. FOR THE BROTHERHOOD: (SGD.) J. R. TOFFLEMIRE GENERAL CHAIRMAN There appeared on behalf of the Corporation: E. J. Houlihan – Senior Manager, Labour Relations, Montreal G. Benn – Officer, Labour Relations, Montreal G. Selesnic – Manager, Customer Services And on behalf of the Brotherhood: J. R. Tofflemire – General Chairman, Oakville M. Grieve – Local Chairman, Toronto CROA 3266 AWARD OF THE ARBITRATOR The material before the Arbitrator confirms that while operating Train No. 45 from Ottawa to Toronto on November 12, 2000 Locomotive Engineers Bullen and Kozusko made a regular scheduled stop at Brockville. As they entered the Brockville station they stopped at the station platform facing signal 1257N1 on the Kingston Subdivision. In accordance with normal procedure, once the passengers had been detrained and entrained, Mr.
  • Summary of the 2018 – 2022 Corporate Plan and 2018 Operating and Capital Budgets

    Summary of the 2018 – 2022 Corporate Plan and 2018 Operating and Capital Budgets

    p SUMMARY OF THE 2018 – 2022 CORPORATE PLAN AND 2018 OPERATING AND CAPITAL BUDGETS SUMMARY OF THE 2018-2022 CORPORATE PLAN / 1 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................. 5 MANDATE ...................................................................................................................................... 14 CORPORATE MISSION, OBJECTIVES, PROFILE AND GOVERNANCE ................................................... 14 2.1 Corporate Objectives and Profile ............................................................................................ 14 2.2 Governance and Accountability .............................................................................................. 14 2.2.1 Board of Directors .......................................................................................................... 14 2.2.2 Travel Policy Guidelines and Reporting ........................................................................... 17 2.2.3 Audit Regime .................................................................................................................. 17 2.2.4 Office of the Auditor General: Special Examination Results ............................................. 17 2.2.5 Canada Transportation Act Review ................................................................................. 18 2.3 Overview of VIA Rail’s Business .............................................................................................
  • Summary of the 2017 – 2021 Corporate Plan and 2017 Operating and Capital Budgets

    Summary of the 2017 – 2021 Corporate Plan and 2017 Operating and Capital Budgets

    SUMMARY OF THE 2017 – 2021 CORPORATE PLAN AND 2017 OPERATING AND CAPITAL BUDGETS 2017-2021 SUMMARY OF THE CORPORATE PLAN / 1 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................. 5 1. MANDATE ............................................................................................................................................ 15 2. CORPORATE MISSION, OBJECTIVES, PROFILE AND GOVERNANCE ..................................................... 15 2.1 Corporate Objectives and Profile ................................................................................................ 15 2.2 Governance and Accountability .................................................................................................. 15 2.2.1 Board of Directors ............................................................................................................... 15 2.2.2 Train Services Network Changes ......................................................................................... 17 2.2.3 Travel Policy Guidelines and Reporting .............................................................................. 18 2.2.4 Audit Regime ....................................................................................................................... 18 2.2.5 Office of the Auditor General: Special Examination Results ............................................... 18 2.2.6 Canada Transportation Act Review ...................................................................................
  • Local Railway Items from Ottawa Papers - 2011

    Local Railway Items from Ottawa Papers - 2011

    Local Railway Items from Ottawa Papers - 2011 Wednesday 05/01/2011 Kingston Daily British Whi Kingston (CN) Station lease deal derails The roof on the old Montreal Street railway station is caved in -- and so has a deal to lease the crumbling heritage building for commercial use.CN Railway spokesman Jim Feeny confirmed yesterday there is "no prospect at the moment" for a deal it had hoped to sign for a commercial development. Instead, CN Railway, the prop-e rty owner, and the City of Kingston will face off in court later this month. The city is trying to uphold a work order that would force the railroad to stabilize the structure before it falls down completely. Because this is a second possible offence -- the city successfully prosecuted CN about 10 years ago -- the company now faces a possible penalty of $200,000. "We generally would request a fine but also to have the property standards upheld, to have it fixed by a particular date," said city building department manager Steve Murphy. "We've charged them for not bringing it back in compliance. The case has been postponed a couple of times. Our goal is not to get a fine but to have the building preserved." Feeny said CN's focus now is on stabilizing the building. "We had an engineering inspection done," he said. "There's nothing been established about what its use might be. In the next few days we should be in a position to talk about what we will do." Any work on the building must be approved by the federal Historic Sites and Monuments Board of Canada.
  • The Monitor Volume 27, Issue 3 December 2011

    The Monitor Volume 27, Issue 3 December 2011

    The Monitor Volume 27, Issue 3 December 2011 memorable day, Mr. Phelps, who had left Burlington on Inside this issue: Travellers’ Lament at a trip to Boston, found that having mixed up the trains at An Open letter to the Friends 3 Brockville~ Part 1 Essex Junction, he was back on the “Shuttle” returning Director’s Message 4 By Douglas N.W. Smith to Burlington. Giving full vent to his frustrations, Mr. Education Programming 5 In the latter portion of the Phelps ended the last two verses of his poem with the A Glimpse at Christmas around the World 6 nineteenth century, the Hon- following immortal lines: What’s New 6 ourable Edward J. Phelps “I hope in hell, Volunteers 6 composed a piece of dogger- His soul may dwell, Friends of the Brockville Museum 7 el, entitled “The Lay of the Who first invented Essex Junction.” Exhibits 7 Lost Traveller”, lamenting Our Year at a Glance 8 the fate of the passenger These lines formed an epitaph for all railway pa- whose attempt to change trons whose journey included a change of trains at the Calendar of Events 9 trains at Essex Junction, myriad of railway junctions in North America. While it did not become as famous as Essex Junction, in 1907 Brockville was celebrated as a point to bring despair to the traveller desiring to transfer from the Grand Trunk to a Canadian Pacific train. Rather than compose a rhyme for the popular press, George Taylor, MP for Leeds, took his complaint to the House of Commons where his complaint was recorded in the pages of Han- sard.
  • Key Lock & Lantern News

    Key Lock & Lantern News

    KEY LOCK & LANTERN Jul/Aug 2014 NEWS Issue No.28 The Bi-Monthly Digital Supplement to Key Lock & Lantern Magazine Key Lock & Lantern 2014 Convention Spring Brookline North Creek to Host Nickel Plate 765 Railroadiana Auction Annual Rail Fair Event Excursion Schedule Key, Lock & Lantern A non-profit membership KEY LOCK & LANTERN corporation dedicated to the preservation of transportation history and railroad memorabilia The mission of Key, Lock & Lantern is to gather and publish information on the NEWS history of the transportation industry, The Bi-Monthly Digital Supplement to Key Lock & Lantern Magazine and to support the preservation of railroad artifacts. KL&L members have WWW.KLNL.ORG an interest in all aspects of railroad & transportation history, from research and Jul/Aug 2014 Issue #28 preservation projects to the conservation and restoration of all types of historical From the President’s Desk ..........................................................3 memorabilia. Originally formed in 1966, Key, Lock & Lantern, Inc. was officially Railroad Event Calendar...............................................................3 incorporated in 1988 as a non-profit, educational, membership corporation 2014 Key Lock & Lantern Convention.........................................4 in the State of New Jersey, under the North Creek to Host Annual Rail Fair...........................................6 provisions of Section 501(c)(3) of the United States Internal Revenue Code. Spring Brookline Railroadiana Auction......................................8

  • Transport Action Newsletter

    July 2015 5 Transport Action 36-2 More News from Transport Action Canada Appointments of Officers and Volunteer Roles Ottawa's Trillium Line - A Personal View Ben Novak P.Eng., MCP, Dip. BA Under the new Canada Not for Profit Corporations Act, the board of directors, (elected at our Annual General Meeting on Recently the City of Ottawa spend a considerable amount May 9th), appoints the executive officers, at its first meeting. (some $60Million) on the only rail rapid transit facility presently in operation in Ottawa, to enhance capacity and At the board teleconference on May 26th, appointments were: frequency. This entailed adding passing tracks and also president - Harry Gow, Saint-Antoine-sur-Richelieu, QC; changing the rolling stock. I had to see for myself. secretary - Anton Turrittin, Toronto, ON; treasurer - David Jeanes, Ottawa, ON; VP east - Marcus Garnet, Dartmouth, NS; A little background first. The original Trillium Line went from VP west - Peter Lacey, Winnipeg, MB. The past president is a the Bayview area South to Greenboro, along a disused CPR voting member of the executive, so David Jeanes declined to track, which the City had acquired. There are many such serve in two positions and the board asked a previous disused tracks or rights of way in Canadian cities. More on president, David Glastonbury, Ottawa, ON, to fill this role. that will be said later. It was then called the O-Train and travelled some 8 km south from the existing east-west BRT The board approved changes to bank signing officers. Since System (Bus Rapid Transit), tying into it slightly west of the the unexpected death of our volunteer office manager Bert city center.
  • Transport Action Newsletter – Vol. 37, No. 1

    Transport Action Newsletter – Vol. 37, No. 1

    TRANSPORT ACTION NEWSLETTER Volume 37 no 1 — February 2016 IN THIS ISSUE MANITObA Forty years ! ransport Action Canada celebrates in public and would need to be well organ- forty years of public transport ac- ized to give us credibility. Transport 2000 tivism in 2016. On February 3rd, was making some headway in defending and 1976, a dozen or so young profes- promoting railways in the United Kingdom, Tsionals in various disciplines and trades met and I had seen a news item about one Ed Ab- Land of opportunities at the apartment of Doug Stoltz in Ottawa’s bot, the dynamic chair of the Canadian Rail- Page 4 Glebe district to talk about how to respond way Labour Association, speaking in favour to the call by then federal Transport Minister of passenger trains. Out of a discussion with Otto Lang for hearings on the "rationaliza- him arose an idea to contact Transport 2000 ALbERTA tion" of the transcontinental railway passen- through ASLEF, a British Railway trade union ger train network. The meeting quickly got involved in Transport 2000, and that got us down to brass tacks. After an explanation of permission to use the name. That was very the hearings' legal and regulatory framework useful as we could present ourselves as part of by attendees expert in such matters, those an international movement, and we got some present appointed the writer as chair and good position papers on transport to hand out, decided to produce a substantial brief for the as well as letterhead and membership cards to Canadian Transportation Commission.
  • Local Railway Items from Area Papers

    Local Railway Items from Area Papers

    Local Railway Items from Area Papers - Kingston (CN) subdivision 13/02/1851 Brockville Recorder Kingston (CN) A number of delegates from places favorable to a grand Provincial Railroad from Toronto to Montreal met in the Council Chamber at Kingston, Monday, week. The room was filled with citizens and strangers who attended each of the three days the convention was in session. On the second day, Mr. Keefer took his seat as a delagate from the Montreal and Lachine Railroad Company and J.L. McDonald as delegate from Gaganoque. On a motion of Dr. Beatty, resolved that the Mayors and Wardens of each municipality on the line shall form a committee, making in all nine members. Resolved that the provisional committee shall meet in Cobourg. Resolved that the different municipalities shall appropriate £50 each to meet the expenses of the survey. A public dinner took place in honor of the convention. It appears that the proposal to send a delegation .. Was negatived in the Council of Leeds and Grenville by a majority of four. 14/07/1855 Brockville Recorder Kingston (CN) Brockville A locomotive and ballast cars reached Brockville over the Grand Trunk Railway to open rail communications with Montreal. 09/11/1855 The Tribune, Ottawa Kingston (CN) Brockville Grand Trunk Railway. We understand that this railway will be opened for traffic to Brockville on 19th inst. The inhabitants of this city will then be able to reach Montreal in a few hours. 30/11/1855 Perth Courier Kingston (CN) On Saturday 17th last, the Grand Trunk Railway was opened from Montreal to Brockville.
  • Line by Mileage

    Line by Mileage

    Kingston (CN) - By mileage MileageLocation Date Number Notes 37.85Coteau 07/05/1918 27190 GTR is required to make connection between its eastbound passenger trains due to leave Cornwall at 4.15 and 4.45 pm arriving at Coteau Junction at 5.18 and 5.30 pm respectively and the train due to leave Montreal at 5.00 pm and now due at Coteau Junction at 6.00 pm and arriving at Ottawa at 8.45 pm. Rescinded by 28481. 05/05/1955 86141 Authorizes CNR to make changes to the interlocker at Coteau. 08/03/1967 123678 CNR authorized to make changes to the signals on their Kingston sub. between m. 11.0 and m. 54.0. 24/09/1968 R-3428 Approves CNR plan showing signals between m. 11.0 and m. 40.0. 22/05/1984 R-36698 CNR authorized to make changes to the block signal system between m. 25.0 and m. 40.0. 39.3St Catherine Road West 19/07/1963 111714 CNR authorized to make changes to crossing protection at m. 39.3. 39.7 07/07/1971 R-12135 CNR exempted from provision of 53 (1) of G.O. E-14 at switches at m. 39.7 and 69.4 provided no engine or train clears the main track at these locations. 39.72St. Zotique Creek 02/04/1914 21593 GTR authorized to construct Bridge No. 287. 39.8Sainte-Zotique River 07/10/1986 R-39847 CNR authorized to remove the bridge and replace it with 3 1400mm diameter corrugated metal pipes and may operate trains during and after the performance of the work.
  • VIA Rail's 2017 ANNUAL PUBLIC MEETING – QUESTIONS and ANSWERS

    VIA Rail's 2017 ANNUAL PUBLIC MEETING – QUESTIONS and ANSWERS

    2017 ANNUAL PUBLIC MEETING – QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS The below document contains all questions sent to VIA Rail leading up to and during the 2017 Annual Public Meeting webcast. Thank you to everyone who participated in the meeting and sent us their questions. Please note that questions of the same nature have been grouped together. Grammar and syntax of the questions received have been corrected. VIA Préférence 1. Is there any interest in reforming the VIA Préférence system? Relative to the airlines, the benefits are extremely basic, the point thresholds for redemption are high, and the system is very inflexible. VIA Rail is continually looking to improve and evolve the VIA Préférence program. The VIA Préférence program has a very competitive offer compared to other loyalty programs in terms of generosity (the “return on spend”) and has fewer restrictions (e.g., capacity control on redemption seats, blackout periods) than airline loyalty programs. 2. I am a senior and enjoy traveling VIA Rail to Nova Scotia. We use the points when we can, but the system of points accumulation takes too long to be viable, especially for seniors. Are you updating so seniors can accrue and use the points more easily? We are not planning to make changes to the program that are specific to seniors. 3. Why can't you offer Privilege members a little leeway when a ticket change is required? We would encourage travellers who require greater flexibility of travelling to book Economy Plus or Business Plus tickets, which are fully refundable and exchangeable. 4. Why do Premier members not have access to the Business lounge? Due to lounge capacity and the number of visitors, VIA Préférence Premier members enjoy access to VIA Rail’s Business Lounges only when travelling in Business class or with an Economy Plus fare ticket.
  • 2017 Annual Public Meeting – Questions and Answers

    2017 Annual Public Meeting – Questions and Answers

    2017 ANNUAL PUBLIC MEETING – QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS The below document contains all questions sent to VIA Rail leading up to and during the 2017 Annual Public Meeting webcast. Thank you to everyone who participated in the meeting and sent us their questions. Please note that questions of the same nature have been grouped together. Grammar and syntax of the questions received have been corrected. VIA Préférence 1. Is there any interest in reforming the VIA Préférence system? Relative to the airlines, the benefits are extremely basic, the point thresholds for redemption are high, and the system is very inflexible. VIA Rail is continually looking to improve and evolve the VIA Préférence program. The VIA Préférence program has a very competitive offer compared to other loyalty programs in terms of generosity (the “return on spend”) and has fewer restrictions (e.g., capacity control on redemption seats, blackout periods) than airline loyalty programs. 2. I am a senior and enjoy traveling VIA Rail to Nova Scotia. We use the points when we can, but the system of points accumulation takes too long to be viable, especially for seniors. Are you updating so seniors can accrue and use the points more easily? We are not planning to make changes to the program that are specific to seniors. 3. Why can't you offer Privilege members a little leeway when a ticket change is required? We would encourage travellers who require greater flexibility of travelling to book Economy Plus or Business Plus tickets, which are fully refundable and exchangeable. 4. Why do Premier members not have access to the Business lounge? Due to lounge capacity and the number of visitors, VIA Préférence Premier members enjoy access to VIA Rail’s Business Lounges only when travelling in Business class or with an Economy Plus fare ticket.