Imidazole and Triazole Coordination Chemistry for Antifouling Coatings
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Chalmers Publication Library Imidazole and Triazole Coordination Chemistry for Antifouling Coatings This document has been downloaded from Chalmers Publication Library (CPL). It is the author´s version of a work that was accepted for publication in: Journal of Chemistry (ISSN: 2090-9063) Citation for the published paper: Andersson Trojer, M. ; Movahedi, A. ; Blanck, H. (2013) "Imidazole and Triazole Coordination Chemistry for Antifouling Coatings". Journal of Chemistry, vol. 2013 pp. Article ID 946739. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/946739 Downloaded from: http://publications.lib.chalmers.se/publication/185391 Notice: Changes introduced as a result of publishing processes such as copy-editing and formatting may not be reflected in this document. For a definitive version of this work, please refer to the published source. Please note that access to the published version might require a subscription. Chalmers Publication Library (CPL) offers the possibility of retrieving research publications produced at Chalmers University of Technology. It covers all types of publications: articles, dissertations, licentiate theses, masters theses, conference papers, reports etc. Since 2006 it is the official tool for Chalmers official publication statistics. To ensure that Chalmers research results are disseminated as widely as possible, an Open Access Policy has been adopted. The CPL service is administrated and maintained by Chalmers Library. (article starts on next page) Hindawi Publishing Corporation Journal of Chemistry Volume 2013, Article ID 946739, 23 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/946739 Review Article Imidazole and Triazole Coordination Chemistry for Antifouling Coatings Markus Andersson Trojer,1 Alireza Movahedi,1 Hans Blanck,2 and Magnus Nydén1,3 1 Applied Surface Chemistry, Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, 412 96 Goteborg,¨ Sweden 2 Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg, 405 30 Goteborg,¨ Sweden 3 Ian Wark Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia Correspondence should be addressed to Markus Andersson Trojer; [email protected] Received 29 April 2013; Accepted 9 July 2013 Academic Editor: Suleyman Goksu Copyright © 2013 Markus Andersson Trojer et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Fouling of marine organisms on the hulls of ships is a severe problem for the shipping industry. Many antifouling agents are based on five-membered nitrogen heterocyclic compounds, in particular imidazoles and triazoles. Moreover, imidazole and triazoles are 2+ + strong ligands for Cu and Cu , which are both potent antifouling agents. In this review, we summarize a decade of work within our groups concerning imidazole and triazole coordination chemistry for antifouling applications with a particular focus on the very potent antifouling agent medetomidine. The entry starts by providing a detailed theoretical description of the azole-metal coordination chemistry. Some attention will be given to ways to functionalize polymers with azole ligands. Then, the effect of metal coordination in azole-containing polymers with respect to material properties will be discussed. Our work concerning the controlled release of antifouling agents, in particular medetomidine, using azole coordination chemistry will be reviewed. Finally, 2+ an outlook will be given describing the potential for tailoring the azole ligand chemistry in polymers with respect to Cu adsorption 2+ + and Cu → Cu reduction for antifouling coatings without added biocides. 1. Introduction are based on acrylic or methacrylic copolymers. The active substance (TBT) is covalently attached to the carboxylic A major problem for the shipping industry is fouling of group of the polymer, which is hydrolytically instable in marine organisms, such as algae, mussels, and barnacles on slightly alkaline conditions (as in seawater) [1, 4, 6]. Toxic ship hulls [1–5]. As the ship moves through the water, the copper pigment is also included in the TBT-SPC paint hull is subjected to form drag and skin friction drag.Since fouling increases the surface roughness, the skin friction drag systems, which in combination with TBT, provides protection is increased, which subsequently results in increased fuel against the entire spectrum of fouling organisms since some consumption and reduced manoeuvrability [3]. Traditional algae are tolerant to TBT but not to copper and vice versa countermeasures against marine fouling are coatings con- [7]. As the use of TBT containing paints increased, marine taining antifouling toxicants that have had severe environ- life in the vicinity of harbours and marinas was severely mental consequences on marine ecosystems. The most well- affected [8, 9]. The hazardous nature of TBT for the marine known examples are organometallic paint systems (compris- environment is ascribed to its weakening of fish immune ing lead, arsenic, mercury, etc.) which met the market in the systems, causing imposex and sterility in female gastropods early 1960s. The notorious tributyltin self-polishing coating (atsuchlowconcentrationas1ng/L)aswellasitsbioac- (TBT-SPC) was developed in the 1970s [1, 6]. The reason for cumulative properties in mammals [1, 4, 6]. Starting with the success of the TBT-SPC paints is that the rate of release TBT ban for pleasure craft in France 1982, TBT-contain- can be controlled on a molecular level. Generally, these paints ing paint systems were successively phased out in the 1990s 2 Journal of Chemistry and finally banned by IMO (the International Maritime medetomidine [29](seeScheme1)whichisbasedonimi- Organization) [10, 11]. dazole for antifouling purposes [30–32]. Medetomidine is A number of tin-free alternatives have been developed exceptionally efficient against fouling barnacles33 [ ], which due to the restrictive legislation regarding TBT paints. These isoneofthemostproblematicfoulantsinthenorthAtlantic, can crudely be divided into biocide-release and biocide-free yet, without seriously affecting nontarget organisms34 [ –37]. antifouling systems. Biocide-free approaches are dominated Inthisreview,wewillsummarizeadecadeofresearch by paint systems called foul-release coatings.Theantifouling concerning azole (primarily imidazole) coordination chem- mechanism lies in the low surface energy and smoothness istry for antifouling coatings. The work spans a variety of ofthecoating.Thebindersinthesecoatingsaresilicone chemistry disciplines including molecular modelling [38, 39], polymers, for example, PDMS (polydimethylsiloxane) and to surface and colloidal chemistry [40–43], controlled release some extent fluoropolymers, with both possessing very low [30, 31, 40–42, 44–46], coordination chemistry [39, 40, 47], surface energy. polymer synthesis [47–50], and material science [39, 47]. In tin-free SPC paints, tin is replaced by other elements Some references from other groups will be provided; how- such as copper, zinc, and silicon. Even though the side group ever, it is important to note that very few studies have of a few tin-free SPC paint binders also possess biocidal addressed azole coordination for antifouling purposes, and properties, no alternative is nearly as effective as TBT [4, 6]. the area is still rather unexplored. The azole coordination To provide full and long-term fouling protection, it is now approaches implemented by us with respect to antifouling necessary to add other biocides, so called boosters, generally coatings can be divided into three main categories: (1) antifoulant immobilization, (2) triggered release and (3) in combination with copper. The most frequently employed 2+ + boosters are conventional agrochemicals, some of which, Cu /Cu mediated antifouling as described later. for example, irgarol, have been under scrutiny due to low rate of biodegradation as well as toxicity towards nontarget 1.1. Antifoulant Immobilization. Booster biocides, including organisms [1, 4, 6, 10–18].Sincealsotheuseofcopperhas the azole-based molecules already mentioned, are typically been under debate recently, a number of other pigments are small molecules which are molecularly dispersed in the used such as Zn(II), Fe(III), and Ti(IV) oxides [1, 3, 4, 6]. antifouling paint [3, 51]. As a consequence, the biocides leach A generic problem with tin-free SPC paints is premature out from the coating within a couple of weeks (diffusive leakage of the booster biocides [3]. These are not anchored release from thin coatings ∼100 m) [52]. This results in a pre- tothebinder,asTBTis,andarehencesubjectedtofreedif- mature loss of fouling protection which is a severe problem fusion within the paint matrix. The immediate consequence since the desired lifetime of a marine coating is ∼5years[3, of premature leakage is loss of antifouling effect prior to the 4]. However, when the biocides are immobilized on macro- hydrolysis-dependent lifetime of the coating. molecules or colloids (with negligible diffusion coefficients A lot of research and development has been conducted on given there large sizes), the effective diffusion coefficient SPC paints from an environmental perspective. For instance, will be reduced by the magnitude of the stability constant the antifouling substances secreted by marine organism, that for immobilization [53]. We have explored the possibility is,