DOCSLIB.ORG

Pitted Fall 2007 (PDF)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pitted Fall 2007 (PDF) SCHOOL OF EDUCATION UNIVERSITY O F P I T T T S B U R G H H SCHOOL OF EDUCATION FALL 2007 NEWS Impacting Impacting SCHOOL OF EDUCATION www.educationEducation.pitt.edu Education Policy Policy SCHOOL OF EDUCAT ION www.education.pitt.edu 1 From the Dean Meeting the Challenges of 21st-Century Education This issue of School of Education News major effort, led by Mary Margaret Kerr, women and men and what it takes to covers a range of topics relevant to the under way that seeks to improve teachers’ provide such education to all children. challenges of 21st-century education and ability to prevent school violence. We have many challenging tasks before how we at the University of Pittsburgh In addition to these resources, we also us, but we are encouraged by our past are working to meet these challenges and welcome new faculty members—Lindsay successes. The work being done in the continue to effect positive change in the Clare Matsumura, Richard Correnti, and School of Education is highlighted by academic arena. Jennifer Lin Russell—who represent the nearly 150 published journal articles, We begin with a special feature section new expertise in key areas, such as book chapters, and books produced by highlighting some of our new initiatives in how teachers respond to policy changes our faculty members during the 2006–07 Table of Contents the area of learning sciences and policy. in reading curricula, how kindergarten academic year. The article on page 14 lists changes in response to the pressures of some of the prominent journals in which Special Feature Section: This focus reflects our commitment to Impacting Education Policy ........................4 keeping the School of Education at the No Child Left Behind, and the comparative my colleagues have been published; for Cover Story: New Learning Policy vanguard of efforts to understand what study of major programs for school reform. a complete list of published works, please Center Hits the Ground Running kinds of education are needed today Thus, we have a substantial store of visit www.education.pitt.edu/publications/ School News ...........................................14 and how that education can be provided scholarly strength and have added to it facultypublications2007.pdf. I think you Faculty and Staff News...........................16 Alumni News...........................................21 effectively to all. We have opened the with several of the very strongest young will be impressed by the range and extent Learning Policy Center in the School Stein on how school districts successfully scholars in the country. of work being done by our faculty. PUBLISHER of Education and are at work on a new reform has been a major driver of our In addition to developing the new Learning Pitt’s School of Education has been Alan Lesgold doctoral program in learning science new efforts. Policy Center to drive our research and fortunate, both in having a long-term EXECUTIVE EDITOR and policy. Jere Gallagher Third, work in the school’s Institute for outreach efforts, we also are hard at work history of strong faculty and important Learning has shown how the principles that on a new research doctoral program that educational accomplishments and in being COMMUNICATIONS MANAGER These developments are evolving in a Stacey Hallock context that is especially challenging for have been extracted from several decades will allow us to prepare new scholars who able to attract wonderful new colleagues GRAPHIC DESIGNER all schools of education. They represent, of strong work on cognition and learning can help address the difficult problems in recent years. The problems and Don Henderson however, an investment of intellectual and the additional work on disciplinary that urban school systems face. These demands of education today will require PRODUCTION COORDINATOR capital accumulated over several decades literacy in core subject matters can be problems must be confronted by the the energetic investment of talent and Chuck Dinsmore here at Pitt. First, the pioneering work shaped into practical lessons that schools best minds. We have too many school intellectual capital. We happily accept EDITORIAL ASSISTANTS Sarah Jordan Rosenson in cognitive learning of school subjects can bring to the teachers. The institute, systems that are failing to provide basic today’s challenges and count ourselves Aviva Lubowsky that has occurred both at Pitt and at led by University Professor of Psychology education to all children. Also, we need to privileged to have colleagues who are Niki Kapsambelis provide a much higher level of education up to the task of meeting them. Brenda Furiga Carnegie Mellon University provides a and Cognitive Science and LRDC Director strong foundation for improved teaching Lauren Resnick and Executive Director to all children if they are to thrive in the in reading, mathematics, and science. Nancy Israel, also enjoys the substantial information age. And we need to keep Contributors from the School of Education participation of School of Education faculty thinking, in the most rigorous ways faculty include Margaret Smith, Isabel members Anthony Petrosky, Smith, and possible, about just what it means to be The University of Pittsburgh, as an educational institution Alan Lesgold and as an employer, values equality of opportunity, human Beck, Mary Kay Stein, Gaea Leinhardt, Amanda Godley. educated for a world in which computers dignity, and racial/ethnic and cultural diversity. Accordingly, Professor and Dean the University prohibits and will not engage in discrimination are doing progressively more of the things or harassment on the basis of race, color, religion, national Kevin Crowley, James Greeno, Margaret Fourth, faculty members in the Department origin, ancestry, sex, age, marital status, familial status, that used to be the tasks of educated sexual orientation, disability, or status as a disabled veteran McKeown, and me, among others, as well of Administrative and Policy Studies include or a veteran of the Vietnam era. Further, the University will continue to take affirmative steps to support and advance these values consistent with the University’s mission. This as many other colleagues in the Learning experts in such areas as the economics of policy applies to admissions, employment, and access to and treatment in University programs and activities. This is a Research and Development Center (LRDC) education, school law, and international commitment made by the University and is in accordance with federal, state, and/or local laws and regulations. and at Carnegie Mellon. Second, work by comparative education. We also have a For information on University equal opportunity and affirmative action programs and complaint/grievance procedures, please contact the University of Pittsburgh; Office of Affirmative Action, Diversity, and Inclusion; 412 Bellefield Hall; 315 South Bellefield Avenue; Pittsburgh, PA 15260; 412-648-7860. Published in cooperation with the Department of University On the cover: School of Education Dean Alan Lesgold, Pennsylvania Secretary of Education Marketing Communications. UMC6413-1107 SCHOOL OF EDUCATION Geraldwww Zahorchak,.education and Mary Kay.pitt Stein, .edufounding director of the University of Pittsburgh SCHOOL OF EDUCATION www.education.pitt.edu Learning Policy Center, are working together to influence how education policies are developed and modified. 2 SCHOOL OF EDUCAT ION www.education.pitt.edu SCHOOL OF EDUCAT ION www.education.pitt.edu 3 FEATURES FEATURES Learning Policy Center faculty and staff members include, from left, Lindsay Clare Matsumura, Mary Kay Stein, Sarah Coon, Jennifer Lin Russell, and Richard Correnti. LPC is a joint undertaking of Pitt’s School members have designed (scheduled to education in Pennsylvania’s schools. LPC of Education and Learning Research and begin in fall 2008) and bringing LPC into serves as a member of the design team, Development Center (LRDC). Its mission the limelight of local, state, and federal and its staff serve as lead researchers is to advance scholarship that lies at the policymaking. The first endeavor is off to for the STEM centers. intersection of education policy and the a good start, due to a collaboration of a In order to connect researchers and study of learning and to infuse into policy core faculty group that has designed the policymakers, the center is hosting its decisions high-quality, timely research academic program. Thoughts are now second annual Learning Policy Center on effective teaching and learning and turning to the recruitment of students. Colloquium Series. For the 2007–08 series, the school, district, and policy conditions The second endeavor has taken a giant Coon is bringing a policymaker voice to that support their improvement. The value leap forward with the hiring of Sarah what had been primarily a research-based of having a policy center located in a Coon, a recent graduate of Carnegie series last year. The first installment of the “research I” university like Pitt, according Mellon University‘s H. John Heinz III series was on September 19, with Deborah to Dean Alan Lesgold, is the availability School of Public Policy and Management, Lowenberg Ball, dean of the School of of scholarly talent who can buttress in March 2007. Coon has been connecting Education at the University of Michigan, arguments made to policymakers with both with local and state policymakers to as featured speaker. Ball’s comments theoretical acumen and empirical evidence. develop awareness of the new center on schools of education and their role in LPC has been adding such talent at a and to identify the pressing issues on education research were discussed by furious pace. Lindsay Clare Matsumura–– which policymakers will need guidance Paul Goren, vice president of the Spencer a graduate of the University of California, in the near future. One such issue that Foundation. LPC’s October 25 open house Los Angeles, who has held research has emerged is science, technology, featured Roy Romer, former governor of positions at UCLA’s Center for Research engineering, and mathematics (STEM) Colorado and former superintendent of New Learning Policy Center on Evaluation, Standards, and Student education.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 293145618.Pdf
    Leaders in Educational Research LEADERS IN EDUCATIONAL STUDIES Volume 7 Series Editor: Leonard J. Waks Temple University, Philadelphia, USA Scope: The aim of the Leaders in Educational Studies Series is to document the rise of scholarship and university teaching in educational studies in the years after 1960. This half-century has been a period of astonishing growth and accomplishment. The volumes in the series document this development of educational studies as seen through the eyes of its leading practitioners. A few words about the build up to this period are in order. Before the mid-twentieth century school teaching, especially at the primary level, was as much a trade as a profession. Schoolteachers were trained primarily in normal schools or teachers colleges, only rarely in universities. But in the 1940s American normal schools were converted into teachers colleges, and in the 1960s these were converted into state universities. At the same time school teaching was being transformed into an all-graduate profession in both the United Kingdom and Canada. For the first time, school teachers required a proper university education. Something had to be done, then, about what was widely regarded as the deplorable state of educational scholarship. James Conant, in his final years as president at Harvard in the early 1950s, envisioned a new kind of university-based school of education, drawing scholars from mainstream academic disciplines such as history, sociology psychology and philosophy, to teach prospective teachers, conduct educational research, and train future educational scholars. One of the first two professors hired to fulfil this vision was Israel Scheffler, a young philosopher of science and language who had earned a Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Celebrating 50 Years of LRDC (PDF)
    UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Celebrating 50 Years of LRDC This report was published in 2014 by the University of Pittsburgh Learning Research and Development Center. THIS REPORT CELEBRATES THE UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER’S (LRDC) 50 YEARS AS A LEADING INTERDISCIPLINARY CENTER FOR RESEARCH ON LEARNING AND EDUCATION. IT PROVIDES GLIMPSES OF LRDC OVER THE YEARS AND HIGHLIGHTS SOME OF THE EXCITING WORK THAT OCCUPIES OUR CURRENT RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT AGENDA. The Center’s interconnected programs of research and development have reflected its mission of stimulating interaction between research and practice across a broad spectrum of problems, from the neural basis of learning to the development of intelligent tutors to educational policy. Among research institutions in learning and education, this interconnected breadth is unique. The Center’s research has been equally wide-ranging in the domains of learning it has studied. Reading, mathematics, and science—staples of education—have been a continuing focus over much of LRDC’s 50 years. However, the Center also has addressed less-studied learning domains (e.g., history, geography, avionics, and law) as well as the reasoning and intellectual abilities that serve learning across domains. Moreover, social settings for learning, including those outside schools; teaching effectiveness; and technol- ogy for learning are all part of LRDC’s research story. LRDC’s ability to sustain research programs across these diverse, intersecting problems owes much to the cooperation of its partnering schools and depart- ments in the University. The leadership of the University of Pittsburgh has made possible what is often very difficult: a research center that has been able to effectively pursue truly cross-disciplinary research programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Learning Theories Primer
    A Primer on Learning Theories Shayan Doroudi School of Education University of California, Irvine [email protected] What does it mean to learn? How does learning happen? How do we know when someone has learned something? And how do we use these insights to help people learn better–by improving teaching practices or creating technologies that help people learn? While many people, including philosophers and lay people, have pondered on these questions for centuries, they became more prominent with the advent of psychology, a field that can give us scientific insights into how people learn. A variety of learning theories have been proposed from the late nineteenth century (when the field of experimental psychology first formed) to the present day. A learning theory tries to explain how people learn, usually based on an accumulation of scientific evidence. (Technically, we could also develop theories about how animals or machines learn as well, and indeed these informed certain learning theories, as we discuss below.) Scientific experiments that study learning usually give us insights on how someone learns a specific thing in a specific time and place (e.g., how does a student learn when solving math problems in a classroom, or how does a person learn when given a puzzle to solve in a lab?). In reality, learning is a rich and complex phenomenon, and most, if not all, scientists would agree that there is no single kind of learning that can describe all the ways all people learn in all situations. Thus, in practice, what are often called learning theories are really worldviews for how to think about learning.
    [Show full text]
  • Philosophy of Science and to Transform These Spotlights in Time Inspire Our Future Success and Development
    Table of Contents Overview of the First 40 Years ... 00 • • 00 •••• 00 •• 00 •• 00 00. 2 Annual Lecture Series, 1960-2002 ..................... 6 Visiting Fellows and Scholars Program ........... 14 Lunchtime Colloquium .................................... 17 Conferences and Workshops .. ... .... ................... 18 Public Lecture Series ........................................ 26 Advisory Board .......... .. .... .. .. ............... :... ........ 00 26 Resident Fellows and Associates .. ............... .. ... 27 Center Publications ... ............... .. .. .. .... ... ... ........ 2 8 Archives of Scientific Philosophy in the 20th Century .............................. ............ 30 Major Funding Sources ... ................................. 31 CENTER CHRONOLOGY • In 2001-2002, the Center for Philosophy of Scie nce celebrates 40 years of in· 9/1/60 Acaaemic Vice CHancellor Ctiarles• H. Peak:e appoints Aaolf Grun- novation and accomplishment. The timeline included here highlights many baum as Andrew Mellon Professor of Philosophy with a twin mandate to of the Center's remarkable achievements and most memorable moments. establish a first-class center for philosophy of science and to transform These spotlights in time inspire our future success and development. the Department of Philosof:!hy into a leading department in the country. Andrew Mellon chair in philosophy to an unusually promis­ rated sixd1 in one category and eighth d1e main foci of Griinbaum's administra­ ing young scholar, someone so young that the age d1reshold in a second. In a confidential report tion. He relinquished his adnlinistrative of forty years for the Mellon Professorships had to be waived prepared in August 1965 for the Pitt appointment as Center Director in 1978 in order to secure Griinbaum for the chair. Perhaps no ap­ University Study Committee, Philosophy when he became its first chairman, a posi­ pointment at any university has returned greater dividends was among three departments identi- tion he continues to hold.
    [Show full text]
  • Pitted Spring 2009 (PDF)
    SCHOOL OF EDUCATION UNIVERSITY O F PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF EDUCATION SPRING 2009 NEWS Passion, Pursuit, and Progress: Reflections on Achievement SCHOOL OF EDUCATION UNIVERSITY O F PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF EDUCATION From the Dean SPRING 2009 NEWS A New Generation with Plenty to Do Passion, Pursuit, and Progress: Reflections on Achievement Throughout this issue, you will learn good thing, this, too, poses challenges measure the ability to communicate Overall, the combination of longtime about many of the school’s recent accom- for our education system. Learning complex information, appreciate the beauty colleagues and those who have joined plishments. As I reflect on these successes, involves attaching new ideas to existing and intricacy of an effective political us recently gives me confidence and a I feel an overwhelming sense of pride. knowledge and experience. When a argument, or resolve a conflict that might sense of revitalization. As you will see I have always been proud to be a part teacher and a student share little in arise in a business discussion or a school from reading this issue, the faculty of the University of Pittsburgh School the way of experiences, building new board meeting. Filling in a multiple-choice and students have made significant knowledge in the mind of that student test form imposes an additional cognitive contributions already to addressing many Table of Contents of Education, but now, more than ever, load that, for some children, can degrade Cover Story: I realize what a truly special place it is is a special challenge for the teacher. of the issues the field of education faces Passion, Pursuit, and Progress: to be.
    [Show full text]
  • SF-Annual Report-2003
    THE SPENCER FOUNDATION ANNUAL REPORT April 1, 2002 – March 31, 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 Board of Directors and Staff 3 Advisory Committees 5 President’s Report 7 Research Grants: Directions, Highlights, and Grant Application Procedures 12 Fellowships: Directions, Highlights, and Grant Application Procedures 17 Institutional Initiatives: Directions and Highlights 2003 Grants Authorized 19 Research Grants 23 Fellowship Awards 27 Institutional Initiatives 28 Other Grants 31 Grantee Publications Received 34 Independent Auditor’s Report 35 Financial Statements THE SPENCER FOUNDATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND STAFF DIRECTORS STAFF Derek C. Bok Paul D. Goren Susan L. Dauber Rick Steele Chair, as of January 2003 Vice President, Senior Program Officer Director of Information Harvard University Acting President Technology Services as of July 2002, Doris E. Fischer through February 2003 Mary Patterson McPherson Acting Treasurer Conference Coordinator, Chair, through January 2003 as of January 2003 Program Assistant Mary C. Visconti Andrew W. Mellon Foundation Program Assistant, Ellen Condliffe Lagemann Michael Gallimore through July 2002 Howard E. Gardner President through June 2002 Database Developer, Harvard University as of July 2002 Kimberly A. Wright Michael S. McPherson Program Assistant Paul D. Goren President as of August 2003 Kathryn A. Gray through October 2002 The Spencer Foundation, Program Assistant Acting President as of July Ines M. Milne Lauren Jones Young 2002 Secretary and Treasurer Judith Klippenstein Director of Institutional through January 2003 Administrative Assistant Initiatives Cynthia Greenleaf to the President, Chicago Public Schools Mary J. Cahillane Assistant Secretary Chief Financial Officer and to the Foundation Kenji Hakuta Treasurer as of July 2003 Vice Chair R. David Matthews Stanford University Margaret Jay Braatz Staff Assistant Senior Program Officer Ellen Condliffe Lagemann Carrie A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Scientific Image (Clarendon Library of Logic & Philosophy)
    Clarendon Library Of Logic and Philosophy Gerneral Editor:L.Jonathan Cohen The Scientic Image The Clarendon Library of Logic and Philosophy brings together books, by new as well as by established authors, that combine originality of theme with rigour of statement. Its aim is to encourage new research of a professional standard into problems that are of current or perennial interest. Also published in this seriesPhilosophy without Ambiguity by Jay David Atlas Quality and Concept by George Bealer Psychological Models and Neural Mechanisms by Austen Clark The Probable and the Provable by L. Jonathan Cohen The Diversity of Moral Thinking by Neil Cooper The Metaphysics of Modality by Graeme Forbes The Logic of Aspect: An Axiomatic Approach by Anthony Galton Ontological Economy by Dale Gottlieb Experiences: An Inquiry into some Ambiguities by J. M. Hinton The Fortunes of Inquiry by N. Jardine Metaphor: Its Cognitive Force and Linguistic Structure by Eva Feder Kittay The Cement of the Universe: A Study of Causation by J. L. Mackie Divine Commands and Moral Requirements by P. L. Quinn Rationality: A Philosophical Inquiry into the Nature and the Rationale of Reason by Nicholas Rescher Simplicity by Elliot Sober Blindspots by Roy N. Sorenson The Coherence of Theism by Richard Swinburne Anti-Realism and Logic: Truth as Eternal by Neil Tennant The Emergence of Norms by Edna Ullmann-Margalit Ignorance: A Case for Scepticism by Peter Unger The Matter of Minds by Zeno Vendler Chance and Structure: An Essay on the Logical Foundations of Probability by John M. Vickers What is Existence? by C. J.
    [Show full text]
  • Mathematics Learning in Early Childhood. INSTITUTION National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Inc., Washington, D.C
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 107 534 SE 019 342 AUTHOR Payne, Joseph N., Ed. TITLE Mathematics Learning in Early Childhood. INSTITUTION National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Inc., Washington, D.C. PUB DATE 75 NOTE 300p.; NCTM 37th Yearbook AVAILABLE FROM National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Inc., 1906 Association Drive, Reston, VA 22091 ($11 for NCTM members, single copy only; $12 to general public; 2-9 copies, 10 percent off the list price; 10 or more copies, 20 percent off the list price) EDRS PRICE MF-$0.76 HC Not Available from EDES. PLUS POSTAGE DESCRIPTORS Activity Learning; *Curriculum; Elementary Education; *Elementary School Mathematics; Geometry; Instruction; *Learning; Literature Reviews; *Mathematics Education; Measurement; Number Concepts; Problem Solving; *Yearbooks IDENTIFIERS *National Council of Teachers of Mathematics;NCTM ABSTRACT This yearbook presents many aspects of mathematics learning by children between the ages of threeand eight. Addressed to teachers of primary school children, the book begins withchapters discussing learning and cognition, the primary curriculum,and research on mathematics learning at thisage level. Eight subsequent chapters deal with the teaching of specific mathematicscontent: problem solving; mathematical experiences; numberand numeration; operations on whole numbers; fractional numbers;geometry; measurement; and relations, number sentences, and other topics. The final chapter discusses curricular change. Amajor theme throughout the bookis the importance of experience to learning,and the building of new knowledge on the foundation theseexperiences provide. The book is designed to provideeasy reference to both general information, such as answers to researchquestions, and suggested classroom activities related to specific topics.Many illustrations, the use of two-color printing, anda detailed index aid the user in this.
    [Show full text]
  • Champagne, Audrey B.: Klopfer, Leo E. Pittsburah Univ., Pa
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 180 828 AUTHOR Champagne, Audrey B.: Klopfer, Leo E. TITLF An Orientation for Research in Science Education. INST IUTION Pittsburah Univ., Pa. Learning Research and Development Centel*. SPONS AGENCY National Inst. of Education (DHEW), Washington, D.C. REPORT NO LRDC-1978-21 PUB DATE 78 NOTE 39p.; Contains small print EDRS pRICE MF01/PCO2 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS College Science: Educational Development; Educational Objectives: *Iducational Research; Educational Strategies: Elementary School Science; *Elementary Secondary Education; *Higher Education: Learning Theories; Problem Solving: *Research; *Science Education: Secondary School Science; *Technical Reports ABSTRACT Presented is a paper developed by the Learning Research and Development Center at the University of pittsburgh and which is intended for science education researchers. Two major recomm'endations for the orientation of research in science education are proposed. The first is that currently espoused goals of science education should be reexamined and, if necessary, redefined. The second calls for science educators to become aware of and translate pertinent research methodF findings, and theories of behavioral scientists into a2propriate instructional and research procedures for science education. The paper also applies the two reccmmendations as operating principles in both the development of instructional materials and in research,design, providing an illustraticn for prOblem sofving in both domains. (Author/HM1 4********************************************************************** Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made frcm the original document. * ********************************************************************* LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER AN ORIENTATION FOR RESEARCH IN SCIENCE EDUCATION .),-1 AUDRE B. CHAMPAGNE AND LEO E. KLOPFER CI 8?808103 I 1 I .1 - 1 - ."- ) r .1 1 . C) t.- . `'. ILI, ,, .1 r.
    [Show full text]
  • Psychology General Oflice P217 Biological Sciences Building
    Psychology General Ofice P217 Biological Sciences Building Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2E9 Phone: (780) 492-5216 Fax: (780) 492-1768 Lecture 1: The bird’s eye View: The comparatiVe analysis of visual cognition --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Biography September 17th, 2014 1-160 Centennial Centre for Interdisciplinary Science Dr. Robert Cook (CCIS) ----------------------------------------------- Professor of Psychology Do animals Visually experience a rich object-illed world Dean of Graduate School of Arts and similar to our own? This presentation will discuss the Sciences eVolutionary and comparatiVe aspects of Visual perception Cook began his career at Tufts in 1986, when he joined the and cognition in animals. The investigation of visual Department of Psychology as an assistant professor. He was cognition in birds will be featured and contrasted with promoted to full professor in 1999, and serVed as department 1indings in primates. The contrast of these two classes of chair from 2005 to 2011. He is a member of the American highly Visual Vertebrates reVeals much about the interaction Psychological Association and a past president of the ComparatiVe between the software and hardware of Vision and its Cognition Society. implementation in different brain organizations. The larger He has studied animal cognition and behaVior for more than 25 implications for a general theory of Vision will also be years. His comparatiVe research, supported by the National presented. Science Foundation and the National Institutes of Health, has focused on stimulus control, discrimination learning and memory in animals. In particular, he has been Very interested in the Lecture 2: mechanisms of Visual perception and discrimination learning in Beauty and the beast: The comparatiVe pigeons and starlings, and their comparatiVe relations to our own perception of the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing Competence in Professional Performance Across Disciplines and Professions with a Foreword by Lee S
    Innovation and Change in Professional Education 13 Paul F. Wimmers Marcia Mentkowski Editors Assessing Competence in Professional Performance across Disciplines and Professions With a Foreword by Lee S. Shulman Innovation and Change in Professional Education Volume 13 Series editor W.H. Gijselaers, School of Business and Economics, Maastricht University The Netherlands Associate editors L.A. Wilkerson, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, TX, USA H.P.A. Boshuizen, Center for Learning Sciences and Technologies, Open Universiteit Nederland, Heerlen, The Netherlands Editorial Board T. Duffy, School of Education, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA H. Gruber, Institute of Educational Science, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany R. Milter, Carey Business School, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA EunMi Park, JH Swami Institute for International Medical Education, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA Eugene L. Anderson, American Dental Education Association, Washington, DC, USA SCOPE OF THE SERIES The primary aim of this book series is to provide a platform for exchanging experiences and knowledge about educational innovation and change in professional education and post-secondary education (engineering, law, medicine, management, health sciences, etc.). The series provides an opportunity to publish reviews, issues of general significance to theory development and research in professional education, and critical analysis of professional practice to the enhancement of educational innovation in the professions. The series promotes publications that deal with pedagogical issues that arise in the context of innovation and change of professional education. It publishes work from leading practitioners in the field, and cutting edge researchers. Each volume is dedicated to a specific theme in professional education, providing a convenient resource of publications dedicated to further development of professional education.
    [Show full text]
  • A A-3 : Learning, Teaching and Assessment
    B. Ed. Spl. Ed. (M. R. / H. I. / V. I)- ODL Programme AREA - A A-3 : LEARNING, TEACHING AND ASSESSMENT A COLLABORATIVE PROGRAMME OF NETAJI SUBHAS OPEN UNIVERSITY AND REHABILITATION COUNCIL OF INDIA 1 AREA - A ●●● CORE COURSE COURSE CODE - A3 LEARNING, TEACHING AND ASSESSMENT Chairman Prof. Subha Sankar Sarkar, Vice Chancellor, Netaji Subhas Open University, DD-26, Sector-I, Kolkata-700064 Convener Prof. Atindranath Dey, Director, School of Education, Netaji Subhas Open University, Kolkata-700 064 Course Writers Unit - 1 Dr. Amrita Panda Unit - 2 Dr. Amit Kumar Maity Unit - 3 Dr. Parimal Sarkar Unit - 4 Dr. Parimal Sarkar Unit - 5 Dr. Rajyashree Roy Editor Prof. Swapan Kumar Sarkar Processing General and Format Editing Ms. Swapna Deb & Dr. Papiya Upadhyay In-house Processing In-charge Ms. Swapna Deb & Mr. Samir Chakrabarti The Self Instructional Material (SIM) is prepared in conformity with the B.Ed.Spl. Edn.(MR/ HI/VI) - ODL Programme as prepared and circulated by the Rehabilitation Council of India, New Delhi and adopted by NSOU on and from the 2015-2017 academic session. © All rights reserved. No part of this work can be reproduced in any form without the written permission from the NSOU authorities. Dr. Ashit Baran Aich Registrar (Actg.) 2 Netaji Subhas Open University From the Vice-Chancellor's Desk Dear Students, from this Academic Session (2015-17) the Curriculum and Course Structure of B. Ed.- Special Education have been thoroughly revised as per the stipulations which featured in the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) between the Rehabilitation Council of India (RCI) and the National Council for Teacher Education (NCTE).
    [Show full text]