DOCSLIB.ORG

A A-3 : Learning, Teaching and Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A A-3 : Learning, Teaching and Assessment B. Ed. Spl. Ed. (M. R. / H. I. / V. I)- ODL Programme AREA - A A-3 : LEARNING, TEACHING AND ASSESSMENT A COLLABORATIVE PROGRAMME OF NETAJI SUBHAS OPEN UNIVERSITY AND REHABILITATION COUNCIL OF INDIA 1 AREA - A ●●● CORE COURSE COURSE CODE - A3 LEARNING, TEACHING AND ASSESSMENT Chairman Prof. Subha Sankar Sarkar, Vice Chancellor, Netaji Subhas Open University, DD-26, Sector-I, Kolkata-700064 Convener Prof. Atindranath Dey, Director, School of Education, Netaji Subhas Open University, Kolkata-700 064 Course Writers Unit - 1 Dr. Amrita Panda Unit - 2 Dr. Amit Kumar Maity Unit - 3 Dr. Parimal Sarkar Unit - 4 Dr. Parimal Sarkar Unit - 5 Dr. Rajyashree Roy Editor Prof. Swapan Kumar Sarkar Processing General and Format Editing Ms. Swapna Deb & Dr. Papiya Upadhyay In-house Processing In-charge Ms. Swapna Deb & Mr. Samir Chakrabarti The Self Instructional Material (SIM) is prepared in conformity with the B.Ed.Spl. Edn.(MR/ HI/VI) - ODL Programme as prepared and circulated by the Rehabilitation Council of India, New Delhi and adopted by NSOU on and from the 2015-2017 academic session. © All rights reserved. No part of this work can be reproduced in any form without the written permission from the NSOU authorities. Dr. Ashit Baran Aich Registrar (Actg.) 2 Netaji Subhas Open University From the Vice-Chancellor's Desk Dear Students, from this Academic Session (2015-17) the Curriculum and Course Structure of B. Ed.- Special Education have been thoroughly revised as per the stipulations which featured in the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) between the Rehabilitation Council of India (RCI) and the National Council for Teacher Education (NCTE). The newly designed course structure and syllabus is comprehensive and futuristic has, therefore, been contextualized and adopted by NSOU from the present academic session, following the directives of the aforesaid national statutory authorities. Consequent upon the introduction of new syllabus the revision of Self Instructional Material (SIM) becomes imperative. The new syllabus was circulated by RCI for introduction in the month of June, 2015 while the new session begins in the month of July. So the difficulties of preparing the SIMs within such a short time can easily be understood. However, the School of Education of NSOU took up the challenge and put the best minds together in preparing SIM without compromising the standard and quality of such an academic package. It required many rigorous steps before printing and circulation of the entire academic package to our dear learners. Every intervening step was meticulously and methodically followed for ensuring quality in such a time bound manner. The SIMs are prepared by eminent subject experts and edited by the senior members of the faculty specializing in the discipline concerned. Printing of the SIMs has been done with utmost care and attention. Students are the primary beneficiaries of these materials so developed. Therefore, you must go through the contents seriously and take your queries, if any, to the Counselors during Personal Contact Programs (PCPs) for clarifications. In comparison to F2F mode, the onus is on the learners in the ODL mode. So please change your mind accordingly and shrug off your old mindset of teacher dependence and spoon feeding habits immediately. 3 I would further urge you to go for other Open Educational Resources (OERs) - available on websites, for better understanding and gaining comprehensive mastery over the subject. From this year NSOU is also providing ICT enabled support services to the students enrolled under this University. So, in addition to the printed SIMs, the e-contents are also provided to the students to facilitate the usage and ensure more flexibility at the user end. The other ICT based support systems will be there for the benefit of the learners. So please make the most of it and do your best in the examinations. However, any suggestion or constructive criticism regarding the SIMs and its improvement is welcome. 1 must acknowledge the contribution of all the content writers, editors and background minds at the SoE, NSOU for their respective efforts, expertise and hard work in producing the SIMs within a very short time. Professor (Dr.) Subha Sankar Sarkar Vice-Chancellor, NSOU 4 B. Ed. Spl. Ed (M. R. / H. I. / V. I)- ODL Programme AREA - A A-3 : LEARNING, TEACHING AND ASSESSMENT 5 First Edition : May, 2016 Printed in accordance with the regulations and financial assistance of the DEB-UGC, Government of India 6 AREA - A Netaji Subhas Open A-3 : LEARNING, TEACHING University AND ASSESSMENT A-3 ❐ Learning, Teaching and Assessment UNIT - 1 : HUMAN LEARNING AND INTELLIGENCELRAL PALSY (CP) 9-73 UNIT - 2 : LEARNING PROCESS AND MOTIVATION 74-117 UNIT - 3 : TEACHING LEARNING PROCESS 118-153 UNIT - 4 : OVER VIEW OF ASSESSMENT AND SCHOOL SYSTEM 154-201 UNIT - 5 : ASSESSMENT : STRATEGIES AND PRACTICES 202-220 CONDITIONS CONDITIONS 7 8 Unit- 1 ❒ Human Learning and Intelligence Structure : 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Objectives 1.3 Human learning, Meaning, definition and concept formation 1.3.1 Learning theories 1.3.1.1 Behaviourism 1.3.1.2 Edward Thorndike 1.3.1.3 B. F. Skinner 1.3.1.4 Cognitivism 1.3.1.5 Jean Piaget 1.3.1.6 Kohlberg 1.3.1.7 Social constructivism 1.3.1.8 Lev Vygotsky 1.3.1.9 Albert Bandura 1.4 Intelligence 1.4.1 Concept and Definition 1.4.2 Vernan’s classification 1.4.3 Types of Intelligence 1.4.4 Theories of Intelligence 1.4.4.1 Charles Spearman—General Intelligence 1.4.4.2 Howard Cardner Multiple Intelligence 1.4.4.3 Robert sternberg Triarchic Theory of Intelligence 1.5 Creativity : Concept, Definition and Characteristics. 1.5.1 Motivation and intelligence 1.6 Implications for Classroom Teaching and Learning 9 1.7 References 1.8 ‘‘Check Your Progress’’ 1.9 Let Us Sum Up 1.1 Introduction This module highlights the concept of learning and intelligence. Through this module we would try to understand the basic concepts of learning, the frontier theories and its application in academics. Apart from learning the present module concentrates on another basic concept in Psychology, i.e., intelligence. We will discuss the definitions, characteristics, a brief history of intelligence measurement, followed by leading theories in intelligence. The module will further concentrate on another psychological construct very closely associated with intelligence, i.e., creativity. We will discuss the concept, nature and characteristics of creativity followed by implications of learning in academic settings. At the end of this module students are expected to have a clear understanding about learning and intelligence and its application in academics. 1.2 Objectives At the end of successful completion of the module students will be able to understand the following: — The concept and nature of learning. — The various perspectives and theories of learning principle, with a highlight to behavioristic theories, cognitive theories and social learning theories. — The concept and characteristics of intelligence. — Various intelligence theories with a highlight on Spearman’s two factor theory, Gardner’s multiple intelligence theory and Steinberg’s Triarchich intelligence theory. — The concept, definition and characteristics of creativity. It’s relationship with motivation and intelligence. — The Implications for Classroom Teaching and Learning. 10 1.3 Human learning: Meaning, definition and concept formation Learning can be defined as the process leading to relatively permanent behavioral change or potential behavioral change. In other words, as we learn, we alter the way we perceive our environment, the way we interpret the incoming stimuli, and therefore the way we interact, or behave. Learning is one of the most important activities in which humans engage. It is at the very core of the educational process, although most of what people learn occurs outside of school. For thousands of years, philosophers and psychologists have sought to understand the nature of learning, how it occurs, and how one person can influence the learning of another person through teaching and similar endeavors. Various theories of learning have been suggested, and these theories differ for a variety of reasons. Evolving Theories of Learning The modern psychological study of learning can be dated from the work of Hermann Ebbinghaus (1850-1909), whose well-known study of memory was published in 1885. Other early studies of learning were by Edward L. Thorndike (1874-1949), whose dissertation on problem solving was published in 1898, and Ivan Pavlov (1849- 1936), whose research on classical conditioning was begun in 1899 but first published in English in 1927. These theories focused on explaining the behavior of individuals and became known as behavioral theories. These theories use a stimulus- response framework to explain learning and dominated psychology and education for over half a century. Because behavioral theories focus on environmental factors such as reinforcement, feedback, and practice, they conceptualize learning as something that occurs from the outside in. Behavioral theories provide very good explanations for certain kinds of learning but poor explanations for other types of learning. Operant conditioning, for example, is better than other theories at explaining the rote acquisition of information, the learning of physical and mental skills, and the development of behaviors conducive to a productive classroom (i.e., classroom management). In these situations, the focus is on performing behavioral tasks rather than developing a learner’s cognitive structure or understanding. Although classical conditioning frequently is dismissed as irrelevant to human learning (Pavlov’s initial research paradigm involved dogs salivating), this type of learning provides by far the best explanation of how and why people, including students, respond emotionally to a wide variety of stimuli and situations. The many types of emotional reactions acquired through classical 11 conditioning include: anger toward or hatred for a particular person or group, phobias to a particular subject area or to school itself, and infatuation with another person.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Grading System
    Pro. Jinal P. Patel / International Journal for Research in Vol. 3, Issue: 2, March-April 2014 Education (IJRE) ISSN: (P) 2347-5412 ISSN: (O) 2320-091X Grading System PROF. JINAL P. PATEL The Sandipani Shikshan Mahavidhyalaya, Ghatlodia, Ahmedabad Gujarat (India) Abstract: Grading in the realm of education is the process of applying standardized measurements of varying levels of comprehension within a subject area. Adoption of grading system in India, the grading system was introduced in 2008-09 from class I-VIII, reducing the exam stress. Extending the concept to class IX and X has further reduced the pressure, giving students an opportunity to explore other avenues. Following the US model, the implementation of the grading system is to bring in more practical education than the current theoretical method. This model prescribes a varied range of opportunities, providing children of all levels a platform to showcase their talent and pursue their interests traditionally; class XI students were given subjects as per marks scored in Class X. This system often disappointed students if they scored low. Moreover, if a student didn't get the required percentage due to poor scoring in one subject, then the entire percentage gets affected. The grading system will give students relief. It will provide ample opportunities to students to excel in their choice filed. The Indian education system has taken a step forward towards reviving the education system with the introduction of grading system in session 2009-10. It will help in reducing the pressure on students during exams. In the last five years the meaning of education has changed for students from imbibing knowledge to merely scoring marks, resulting in myriad forms of education policies.
    [Show full text]
  • 293145618.Pdf
    Leaders in Educational Research LEADERS IN EDUCATIONAL STUDIES Volume 7 Series Editor: Leonard J. Waks Temple University, Philadelphia, USA Scope: The aim of the Leaders in Educational Studies Series is to document the rise of scholarship and university teaching in educational studies in the years after 1960. This half-century has been a period of astonishing growth and accomplishment. The volumes in the series document this development of educational studies as seen through the eyes of its leading practitioners. A few words about the build up to this period are in order. Before the mid-twentieth century school teaching, especially at the primary level, was as much a trade as a profession. Schoolteachers were trained primarily in normal schools or teachers colleges, only rarely in universities. But in the 1940s American normal schools were converted into teachers colleges, and in the 1960s these were converted into state universities. At the same time school teaching was being transformed into an all-graduate profession in both the United Kingdom and Canada. For the first time, school teachers required a proper university education. Something had to be done, then, about what was widely regarded as the deplorable state of educational scholarship. James Conant, in his final years as president at Harvard in the early 1950s, envisioned a new kind of university-based school of education, drawing scholars from mainstream academic disciplines such as history, sociology psychology and philosophy, to teach prospective teachers, conduct educational research, and train future educational scholars. One of the first two professors hired to fulfil this vision was Israel Scheffler, a young philosopher of science and language who had earned a Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Celebrating 50 Years of LRDC (PDF)
    UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Celebrating 50 Years of LRDC This report was published in 2014 by the University of Pittsburgh Learning Research and Development Center. THIS REPORT CELEBRATES THE UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER’S (LRDC) 50 YEARS AS A LEADING INTERDISCIPLINARY CENTER FOR RESEARCH ON LEARNING AND EDUCATION. IT PROVIDES GLIMPSES OF LRDC OVER THE YEARS AND HIGHLIGHTS SOME OF THE EXCITING WORK THAT OCCUPIES OUR CURRENT RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT AGENDA. The Center’s interconnected programs of research and development have reflected its mission of stimulating interaction between research and practice across a broad spectrum of problems, from the neural basis of learning to the development of intelligent tutors to educational policy. Among research institutions in learning and education, this interconnected breadth is unique. The Center’s research has been equally wide-ranging in the domains of learning it has studied. Reading, mathematics, and science—staples of education—have been a continuing focus over much of LRDC’s 50 years. However, the Center also has addressed less-studied learning domains (e.g., history, geography, avionics, and law) as well as the reasoning and intellectual abilities that serve learning across domains. Moreover, social settings for learning, including those outside schools; teaching effectiveness; and technol- ogy for learning are all part of LRDC’s research story. LRDC’s ability to sustain research programs across these diverse, intersecting problems owes much to the cooperation of its partnering schools and depart- ments in the University. The leadership of the University of Pittsburgh has made possible what is often very difficult: a research center that has been able to effectively pursue truly cross-disciplinary research programs.
    [Show full text]
  • View Bad Ideas About Writing
    BAD IDEAS ABOUT WRITING Edited by Cheryl E. Ball & Drew M. Loewe BAD IDEAS ABOUT WRITING OPEN ACCESS TEXTBOOKS Open Access Textbooks is a project created through West Virginia University with the goal of produc- ing cost-effective and high quality products that engage authors, faculty, and students. This project is supported by the Digital Publishing Institute and West Virginia University Libraries. For more free books or to inquire about publishing your own open-access book, visit our Open Access Textbooks website at http://textbooks.lib.wvu.edu. BAD IDEAS ABOUT WRITING Edited by Cheryl E. Ball and Drew M. Loewe West Virginia University Libraries Digital Publishing Institute Morgantown, WV The Digital Publishing Institute believes in making work as openly accessible as possible. Therefore, this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. This license means you can re-use portions or all of this book in any way, as long as you cite the original in your re-use. You do not need to ask for permission to do so, although it is always kind to let the authors know of your re-use. To view a copy of this CC license, visit http://creative- commons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, PO Box 1866, Mountain View, CA 94042, USA. This book was set in Helvetica Neue and Iowan Old Style and was first published in 2017 in the United States of America by WVU Libraries. The original cover image, “No Pressure Then,” is in the public domain, thanks to Pete, a Flickr Pro user.
    [Show full text]
  • Learning Theories Primer
    A Primer on Learning Theories Shayan Doroudi School of Education University of California, Irvine [email protected] What does it mean to learn? How does learning happen? How do we know when someone has learned something? And how do we use these insights to help people learn better–by improving teaching practices or creating technologies that help people learn? While many people, including philosophers and lay people, have pondered on these questions for centuries, they became more prominent with the advent of psychology, a field that can give us scientific insights into how people learn. A variety of learning theories have been proposed from the late nineteenth century (when the field of experimental psychology first formed) to the present day. A learning theory tries to explain how people learn, usually based on an accumulation of scientific evidence. (Technically, we could also develop theories about how animals or machines learn as well, and indeed these informed certain learning theories, as we discuss below.) Scientific experiments that study learning usually give us insights on how someone learns a specific thing in a specific time and place (e.g., how does a student learn when solving math problems in a classroom, or how does a person learn when given a puzzle to solve in a lab?). In reality, learning is a rich and complex phenomenon, and most, if not all, scientists would agree that there is no single kind of learning that can describe all the ways all people learn in all situations. Thus, in practice, what are often called learning theories are really worldviews for how to think about learning.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment for Learning in Classroom
    ASSESSMENT FOR LEARNING IN CLASSROOM PRASANTH VENPAKAL ASSESSMENT FOR LEARNING IN CLASSROOM Learning is a relatively permanent change in, or acquisition of knowledge, understanding or behavior. There are three ways of learning, they’re Transmission, Reception and Construction. Student Evaluation in Transmission Reception ( Behaviorist ) Model of Education Reception is model of learning where there is transmission of knowledge from the external source (for example, teacher) to the receiver (students). So, learning here is being taught. The teacher gives students the concept and knowledge while students are only receiving it purely. Transmission is Sending & Receiving messages, knowledge, signals. Which includes no scope for creativity, Rigidity and Generally method of teaching is Lecture Method. Behaviorism Theory of Learning “ Teachers must learn how to teach … they need only to be taught more effective ways of teaching.” -B. F. Skinner By: Brittaney Behaviorism assumes that a learner is essentially passive, responding to environmental stimuli. It Believes that When born our mind is ‘tabula rasa’ (a blank slate) , and behavior is shaped by positive and negative reinforcement. Behaviorism is primarily concerned with observable behavior, as opposed to internal events like thinking and emotion. Observable (i.e. external) behavior can be objectively and scientifically measured. Internal events, such as thinking should be explained through behavioral terms (or eliminated altogether). Assessment in Behaviorist Model of Education Here the importance is to assess how much students where receiving the information transmitted by the teacher. Knowledge transmission cannot be evaluated. But indirect methods can be used to assess attention or emotional states. Here teacher can assess only the success of teaching process.
    [Show full text]
  • Philosophy of Science and to Transform These Spotlights in Time Inspire Our Future Success and Development
    Table of Contents Overview of the First 40 Years ... 00 • • 00 •••• 00 •• 00 •• 00 00. 2 Annual Lecture Series, 1960-2002 ..................... 6 Visiting Fellows and Scholars Program ........... 14 Lunchtime Colloquium .................................... 17 Conferences and Workshops .. ... .... ................... 18 Public Lecture Series ........................................ 26 Advisory Board .......... .. .... .. .. ............... :... ........ 00 26 Resident Fellows and Associates .. ............... .. ... 27 Center Publications ... ............... .. .. .. .... ... ... ........ 2 8 Archives of Scientific Philosophy in the 20th Century .............................. ............ 30 Major Funding Sources ... ................................. 31 CENTER CHRONOLOGY • In 2001-2002, the Center for Philosophy of Scie nce celebrates 40 years of in· 9/1/60 Acaaemic Vice CHancellor Ctiarles• H. Peak:e appoints Aaolf Grun- novation and accomplishment. The timeline included here highlights many baum as Andrew Mellon Professor of Philosophy with a twin mandate to of the Center's remarkable achievements and most memorable moments. establish a first-class center for philosophy of science and to transform These spotlights in time inspire our future success and development. the Department of Philosof:!hy into a leading department in the country. Andrew Mellon chair in philosophy to an unusually promis­ rated sixd1 in one category and eighth d1e main foci of Griinbaum's administra­ ing young scholar, someone so young that the age d1reshold in a second. In a confidential report tion. He relinquished his adnlinistrative of forty years for the Mellon Professorships had to be waived prepared in August 1965 for the Pitt appointment as Center Director in 1978 in order to secure Griinbaum for the chair. Perhaps no ap­ University Study Committee, Philosophy when he became its first chairman, a posi­ pointment at any university has returned greater dividends was among three departments identi- tion he continues to hold.
    [Show full text]
  • Pitted Spring 2009 (PDF)
    SCHOOL OF EDUCATION UNIVERSITY O F PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF EDUCATION SPRING 2009 NEWS Passion, Pursuit, and Progress: Reflections on Achievement SCHOOL OF EDUCATION UNIVERSITY O F PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF EDUCATION From the Dean SPRING 2009 NEWS A New Generation with Plenty to Do Passion, Pursuit, and Progress: Reflections on Achievement Throughout this issue, you will learn good thing, this, too, poses challenges measure the ability to communicate Overall, the combination of longtime about many of the school’s recent accom- for our education system. Learning complex information, appreciate the beauty colleagues and those who have joined plishments. As I reflect on these successes, involves attaching new ideas to existing and intricacy of an effective political us recently gives me confidence and a I feel an overwhelming sense of pride. knowledge and experience. When a argument, or resolve a conflict that might sense of revitalization. As you will see I have always been proud to be a part teacher and a student share little in arise in a business discussion or a school from reading this issue, the faculty of the University of Pittsburgh School the way of experiences, building new board meeting. Filling in a multiple-choice and students have made significant knowledge in the mind of that student test form imposes an additional cognitive contributions already to addressing many Table of Contents of Education, but now, more than ever, load that, for some children, can degrade Cover Story: I realize what a truly special place it is is a special challenge for the teacher. of the issues the field of education faces Passion, Pursuit, and Progress: to be.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2006-2007
    DISE Department of Integrated Studies in Education 2006-2007 Annual Report Prepared by: Dr. Steven Jordan (Chair) Marisa Terrenzio-El-Jaoui (Administrative Officer) Kathleen McElroy (Chair’s Secretary) Annual Reports appended: Undergraduate Program Director: Dr. Caroline Riches Graduate Program Co-Directors: Dr. Roy Lyster and Dr. Carolyn Turner CEL (Centre for Educational Leadership): Dr. Lynn Butler- Kisber CSTW (Centre for the Study and Teaching of Writing): Dr. Anthony Paré FNIE (First Nations and Inuit Education): Donna-Lee Smith ISERT (Indigenous Research): Dr. Michael Doxtater i Department of Integrated Studies in Education Annual Report 2006-2007 Contents Page Section I: Description of Unit............................................................................................. 1 A. Mission........................................................................................................................... 1 B. Objectives....................................................................................................................... 5 Section II: Departmental Activities 2006-07..................................................................... 8 A. Teaching and Learning .................................................................................................. 8 1. Achievements and Innovations................................................................................ 8 2. Cooperation with Other Teaching Units.................................................................. 9 3 Accreditation...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Welcome to the Fourteenth Annual Hawaii International Conference on Education
    Welcome to the Fourteenth Annual Hawaii International Conference on Education Aloha! We welcome you to the Fourteenth Annual Hawaii International Conference on Education. For more than a decade, this event has offered a unique opportunity for academics and other professionals from around the globe to share their broad array of knowledge and perspectives. The primary goal of the conference is to provide those with cross-disciplinary interests related to education to meet and interact with others inside and outside their own discipline. The international aspect of the conference brings a truly diverse variety of viewpoints shaped by different cultures, languages, geography and politics. This diversity is also captured in the Hawaii International Conference’s unique cross- disciplinary approach. The resulting interaction energizes research as well as vocation. With Waikiki Beach, Diamond Head and the vast South Pacific as the backdrop, this venue is an important dimension of this conference. For centuries a stopping place of explorers, Hawaii has historically been enriched by the blend of ideas that have crossed our shores. The Hawaii International Conference on Education continues this tradition in the nurturing spirit of Aloha. Along with its ideal weather and striking beauty, the Hawaiian Islands provide natural elements to inspire learning and dialogue. This year we have more than 1250 participants representing more than 31 countries. Thank you for joining the 2016 Hawaii International Conference on Education! The 2017 Hawaii International
    [Show full text]
  • SF-Annual Report-2003
    THE SPENCER FOUNDATION ANNUAL REPORT April 1, 2002 – March 31, 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 Board of Directors and Staff 3 Advisory Committees 5 President’s Report 7 Research Grants: Directions, Highlights, and Grant Application Procedures 12 Fellowships: Directions, Highlights, and Grant Application Procedures 17 Institutional Initiatives: Directions and Highlights 2003 Grants Authorized 19 Research Grants 23 Fellowship Awards 27 Institutional Initiatives 28 Other Grants 31 Grantee Publications Received 34 Independent Auditor’s Report 35 Financial Statements THE SPENCER FOUNDATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND STAFF DIRECTORS STAFF Derek C. Bok Paul D. Goren Susan L. Dauber Rick Steele Chair, as of January 2003 Vice President, Senior Program Officer Director of Information Harvard University Acting President Technology Services as of July 2002, Doris E. Fischer through February 2003 Mary Patterson McPherson Acting Treasurer Conference Coordinator, Chair, through January 2003 as of January 2003 Program Assistant Mary C. Visconti Andrew W. Mellon Foundation Program Assistant, Ellen Condliffe Lagemann Michael Gallimore through July 2002 Howard E. Gardner President through June 2002 Database Developer, Harvard University as of July 2002 Kimberly A. Wright Michael S. McPherson Program Assistant Paul D. Goren President as of August 2003 Kathryn A. Gray through October 2002 The Spencer Foundation, Program Assistant Acting President as of July Ines M. Milne Lauren Jones Young 2002 Secretary and Treasurer Judith Klippenstein Director of Institutional through January 2003 Administrative Assistant Initiatives Cynthia Greenleaf to the President, Chicago Public Schools Mary J. Cahillane Assistant Secretary Chief Financial Officer and to the Foundation Kenji Hakuta Treasurer as of July 2003 Vice Chair R. David Matthews Stanford University Margaret Jay Braatz Staff Assistant Senior Program Officer Ellen Condliffe Lagemann Carrie A.
    [Show full text]
  • Utilizing Ungraded Portfolios for Evaluation in Fine Arts
    Utilizing Ungraded Portfolios for Evaluation in Fine Arts by Michael Barry Saul M.A. (Education), Simon Fraser University, 2004 B.Ed., Simon Fraser University, 1987 THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in the Arts Education Program Faculty of Education © Michael Barry Saul 2011 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY Fall 2011 All rights reserved. However, in accordance with the Copyright Act of Canada, this work may be reproduced, without authorization, under the conditions for Fair Dealing. Therefore, limited reproduction of this work for the purposes of private study, research, criticism, review and news reporting is likely to be in accordance with the law, particularly if cited appropriately. Approval Name: Michael Barry Saul Degree: Doctor of Philosophy Title of Thesis: Utilizing Ungraded Portfolios for Evaluation in Fine Arts Examining Committee: Chair: Dr. Susan O'Neill, Associate Professor Dr. Carolyn Mamchur Professor Senior Supervisor Dr. Linda Apps Assistant/Associate/Professor Supervisor Dr. Stuart Richmond Professor Supervisor Peter Grimmett, Professor and Head EDCP, Dept of Curriculum & Pedagogy, UBC External Examiner Date Defended/Approved: 06 December 2011 ii Declaration of Partial Copyright Licence The author, whose copyright is declared on the title page of this work, has granted to Simon Fraser University the right to lend this thesis, project or extended essay to users of the Simon Fraser University Library, and to make partial or single copies only for such users or in response to a request from the library of any other university, or other educational institution, on its own behalf or for one of its users.
    [Show full text]