DOCSLIB.ORG

Supplementary Material Click Here to Download Attachment to Manuscript: Brassica Fitzjohn Suppl Resubmit.Doc

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Supplementary Material Click Here to Download Attachment to Manuscript: Brassica Fitzjohn Suppl Resubmit.Doc online supplementary material Click here to download attachment to manuscript: brassica_fitzjohn_suppl_resubmit.doc 1 Supplementary material for ‘Hybridisation within Brassica and allied genera: 2 evaluation of potential for transgene escape’ 3 4 Online Appendix 1: 1 !experimental" sources 5 Papers documenting experimental hybridisation, including cross direction and % success/failure used in making Figures 1 3! "#uccess$ means that any trial in the article ( &as successful, &hile "Fail$ means that all trials &ere unsuccessful! 'rticles that ) successfully produced hybrids, but reported one or more trials &here hybrids &ere not . produced, are indicated &ith an asterisk *+,! -n lists "'s male$ or "'s female$ refer to the 10 role of the crop species in the cross! /ote that crosses &here both parents are crops 11 species *Brassica carinata, B. juncea, B. napus, B. nigra, B. oleracea, B. rapa, Raphanus 12 sativus and Sinapis alba, are listed t&ice! 13 14 1rassica carinata 15 1% 2 ith Brassica juncea 1( • 's male *success,3 4 *1.35,5 6ahman *1.(%, 1.(),5 'nand et al! *1.)5,5 7atiyar 1) 8 9upta *1.)(,5 #ubudhi 8 6aut *1..4b,5 7atiyar 8 :hamola *1..5,! + 1. • 's female *success,3 6ahman *1.(%,5 9etinet et al! *1..4, 1..(,! 20 • 's female *failure,3 4 *1.35,! 21 22 2 ith Brassica maurorum 23 • 's male *failure,3 :hrungu et al! *1...,! 24 25 2 ith Brassica napus 2% • 's male *success,3 4 *1.35,5 6oy *1.)0,5 2 ahidu;;aman *1.)(,5 Fernande;< 2( =scobar et al! *1.)),5 :hen 8 >eneen *1..2,5 6ashid et al! *1..4,! 2) • 's female *success,3 6oy *1.)0,5 2 ahidu;;aman *1.)(,5 Fernande;<=scobar et 2. al! *1.)),5 9etinet et al! *1..(,! 30 • 's female *failure,3 4 *1.35,! 31 32 2 ith Brassica nigra 33 • 's female *success,3 4 *1.35,5 ?i;ushima *1.50,! 34 35 2 ith Brassica oleracea 3% • 's male *success,3 ?orinaga *1.33,5 1arciko&ska et al! *1.)3,! + 3( • 's female *success,3 4 *1.35,5 ?i;ushima *1.50,5 6ahman *2001,! 3) • 's male *failure,3 4 *1.35,5 6ahman *2001,! 3. • 's female *failure,3 ?orinaga *1.33,5 @onguA 8 9riffiths *2004,! 40 41 2 ith Brassica rapa 42 • 's male *success,3 >o&ard *1.42,5 #truss et al! *1..1,5 ?eng et al! *1..),5 43 6ahman *2001,! 44 • 's female *success,3 ?i;ushima *1.50,5 #truss et al! *1..1,5 :houdhary et al! 45 *2000a,5 6ahman *2001,! 4% • 's male *failure,3 :houdhary et al! *2000a,! 1 4( • 's female *failure,3 ?eng et al! *1..),! 4) 4. 2ith Brassica tournefortii + 50 • 's female *success,3 Boshi 8 :houdhary *1... ,! 51 • 's male *failure,3 Boshi 8 :houdhary *1...,! 52 53 2ith Enarthrocarpus lyratus 54 • 's male *failure,3 9undimeda et al! *1..2,! 55 • 's female *failure,3 9undimeda et al! *1..2,! 5% 5( 2ith Erucastrum abyssinicum 5) • 's male *failure,3 6ao et al! *1..%,! 5. %0 2ith Orychophragmus violaceus %1 • 's female *success,3 Ci et al! *1..),! %2 • 's male *failure,3 Ci et al! *1..),! %3 %4 2ith Raphanus sativus %5 • 's female *success,3 6ichharia *1.3(,! %% • 's male *failure,3 9upta *1..(,! %( %) 2ith Sinapis alba %. • 's male *failure,3 #rideDi 8 #arla *1..%,! (0 • 's female *failure,3 #rideDi 8 #arla *1..%,! (1 (2 2ith Sinapis arvensis (3 • 's female *success,3 ?i;ushima *1.50,! (4 (5 1rassica Euncea (% (( 2ith Brassica carinata + () • 's male *success,3 6ahman *1.(%,5 9etinet et al! *1..4 , 1..(,! (. • 's female *success,3 4 *1.35,5 6ahman *1.(%, 1.(),5 'nand et al! *1.)5,5 )0 7atiyar 8 9upta *1.)(,5 #ubudhi 8 6aut *1..4b,5 7atiyar 8 :hamola *1..5,! )1 • 's male *failure,3 4 *1.35,! )2 )3 2ith Brassica fruticulosa )4 • 's male *failure,3 #alisbury *1..1,! )5 • 's female *failure,3 #alisbury *1..1,! )% )( 2ith Brassica gravinae )) • 's female *success,3 /anda 7umar et al! *1.))b,! ). • 's male *failure,3 /anda 7umar et al! *1.))b,! .0 .1 2ith Brassica maurorum .2 • 's female *success,3 1iEral et al! *1..5,! 2 .3 • 's male *failure,3 :hrungu et al! *1...,! .4 .5 2ith Brassica napus .% • 's male *success,3 ?orinaga *1.2.b,5 #asaoka *1.30,5 >eyn *1.((,5 6oy *1.)0,5 .( Fan et al! *1.)%,5 2ahidu;;aman *1.)(+,5 Prakash 8 :hopra *1..0a,5 6ao 8 .) 6aut *1..4,5 6ashid et al! *1..4,5 :houdary 8 Boshi *1...+,! .. • 's female *success,3 ?orinaga *1.2.b,5 #asaoka *1.30,5 6ahman *1.(),5 6oy 100 *1.(), 1.)0,5 'nand et al! *1.)5,5 Fhillon et al! *1.)5,5 2ahidu;;aman *1.)(,5 101 Prakash 8 :hopra *1.)),5 #harma 8 #ingh *1..2,5 6ao 8 6aut *1..4,5 #ubudhi 102 8 6aut *1..4a,5 Frello et al! *1..5,5 :houdary 8 Boshi *1...+,! 103 • 's male *failure,3 Fhillon et al! *1.)5,! 104 105 2ith Brassica nigra 10% • 's female *success,3 ?orinaga *1.31,5 6amanuEam 8 #riniDasachar *1.43,5 10( ?i;ushima *1.50,5 Glsson *1.%0a,5 'nand et al! *1.)5,! 10) • 's male *failure,3 6amanuEam 8 #riniDasachar *1.43,5 Glsson *1.%0a,5 9hosh 10. Fastidar 8 Harma *1...,! 110 • 's female *failure,3 9hosh Fastidar 8 Harma *1...,! 111 112 2ith Brassica oleracea 113 • 's male *success,3 #truss et al! *1..1,! 114 • 's male *failure,3 7aki;aki *1.25,5 9hosh Fastidar 8 Harma *1...,! 115 • 's female *failure,3 7aki;aki *1.25,5 9hosh Fastidar 8 Harma *1...,! 11% 11( 2ith Brassica oxyrrhina 11) • 's female *success,3 1iEral 8 #harma *1...b,! 11. • 's male *failure,3 #alisbury *1..1,! 120 • 's female *failure,3 #alisbury *1..1,! 121 122 2ith Brassica rapa 123 • 's male *success,3 ?orinaga *1.2.b,5 6amanuEam 8 #riniDasachar *1.43,5 124 Glsson *1.%0a,5 6oy *1.)0,5 :houdary 8 Boshi *1...+,! 125 • 's female *success,3 ?orinaga *1.2.b,5 #ikka *1.40,5 6amanuEam 8 12% #riniDasachar *1.43,5 ?i;ushima *1.50,5 Glsson *1.%0a,5 6oy *1.)0,5 'nand et 12( al! *1.)5,5 CoDe et al! *1..0,5 7atiyar 8 :hamola *1..),5 :houdary 8 Boshi 12) *1...+,5 :houdhary et al! *2002+,! 12. • 's male *failure,3 7aki;aki *1.25,5 9hosh Fastidar 8 Harma *1...,! 130 • 's female *failure,3 7aki;aki *1.25,5 @akeshita et al! *1.)0,5 9hosh Fastidar 8 131 Harma *1...,! 132 133 2ith Brassica tournefortii 134 • 's male *failure,3 #alisbury *1..1,5 9hosh Fastidar 8 Harma *1...,! 135 • 's female *failure,3 #alisbury *1..1,5 9oyal et al! *1..(,5 9hosh Fastidar 8 13% Harma *1...,! 3 13( 13) 2ith Camelina sativa 13. • 's male *failure,3 #alisbury *1..1,! 140 • 's female *failure,3 #alisbury *1..1,! 141 142 2ith Capsella bursa-pastoris 143 • 's male *failure,3 #alisbury *1..1,! 144 • 's female *failure,3 #alisbury *1..1,! 145 14% 2ith Conringia orientalis 14( • 's male *failure,3 #alisbury *1..1,! 14) • 's female *failure,3 #alisbury *1..1,! 14. 150 2ith Crambe abyssinica 151 • 's female *failure,3 2ang 8 Cuo *1..),! 152 153 2ith Diplotaxis erucoi es 154 • 's female *success,3 -nomata *1..),! 155 • 's male *failure,3 Hyas et al! *1..5,! 15% 15( 2ith Diplotaxis muralis 15) • 's male *failure,3 #alisbury *1..1,! 15. • 's female *failure,3 #alisbury *1..1,! 1%0 1%1 2ith Diplotaxis siifolia 1%2 • 's male *failure,3 1atra et al! *1..0,! 1%3 • 's female *failure,3 1atra et al! *1..0,! 1%4 1%5 2ith Diplotaxis tenuifolia 1%% • 's male *success,3 #alisbury *1..1,! 1%( • 's female *failure,3 #alisbury *1..1,! 1%) 1%. 2ith Diplotaxis tenuisili!ua 1(0 • 's male *failure,3 #alisbury *1..1,! 1(1 • 's female *failure,3 #alisbury *1..1,! 1(2 1(3 2ith Enarthrocarpus lyratus 1(4 • 's male *failure,3 9undimeda et al! *1..2,! 1(5 • 's female *failure,3 9undimeda et al! *1..2,! 1(% 1(( 2ith Eruca vesicaria 1() • 's female *success,3 1iEral 8 #harma *1...a,5 9os&ami 8 FeDi *2002,! 1(. • 's male *failure,3 9hosh Fastidar 8 Harma *1...,! 1)0 1)1 2ith Erucastrum abyssinicum 1)2 • 's male *failure,3 6ao et al! *1..%,! 4 1)3 1)4 2ith Erucastrum gallicum 1)5 • 's male *failure,3 Cefol et al! *1..(,! 1)% • 's female *failure,3 Cefol et al! *1..(,! 1)( 1)) 2ith Erucastrum virgatum 1). • 's female *success,3 -nomata *2001,! 1.0 1.1 2ith "irschfel ia incana 1.2 • 's male *failure,3 #alisbury *1..1,! 1.3 • 's female *failure,3 #alisbury *1..1,! 1.4 1.5 2ith #orican ia arvensis 1.% • 's male *failure,3 @akahata et al! *1..3,! 1.( • 's female *failure,3 @akahata et al! *1..3,! 1.) 1.. 2ith #yagrum perfoliatum 200 • 's male *failure,3 #alisbury *1..1,! 201 • 's female *failure,3 #alisbury *1..1,! 202 203 2ith Orychophragmus violaceus 204 • 's female *success,3 Ci et al! *1..),! 205 • 's male *failure,3 Ci et al! *1..),! 20% 20( 2ith Raphanus raphanistrum 20) • 's female *success,3 7amala *1.)3,! 20.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Study of Herbs Plant of Borsad Tatuka (Gujarat) India
    ISSN: 0975-8585 Research Journal of Pharmaceutical, Biological and Chemical Sciences Study of Herbs Plant of Borsad Tatuka (Gujarat) India. Shah RB*. Biology Department, Arts, Commerce and Science College, Borsad, Gujarat, India. ABSTRACT In the present paper attempt is made to study the herbs plant of borsad and surrounding area the present work is based on the result of two year. All-embracing study of the plant of this area. The present paper compacts with total 201 species belonging to 56 families which are a listed along with their botanical names, families, local name. 201 plants collected and systematically observed during present work, in which 150 species belonging to class dicotyledon and 50 species belonging to class monocotyledons.one is from pteridophyte Total 56 families are perceived. Out of those 41 families are dicotyledon and 15 families is monocotyledons 01 is pteridophyte. The dominant families Malvaceae, Fabaceae, Solanaceae, Asteraceae, Lamiaceae, Amaranthaceae, Euphorbiaceae, Poaceae. Herb plants Used by villagers for different purpose in Borsad. Keywords: herbs Plants, Borsad taluka. *Corresponding author March - April 2014 RJPBCS 5(2) Page No. 1971 ISSN: 0975-8585 INTRODUCTION Borsad is located at 22º25’N 72º54’E / 22.42ºN 72.9ºE. It has an average elevation of 30 meters (98 feet). It is located around 17 km from Anand. Borsad is reach in biodiversity; present study was carried out during 2011-13. The present study deals with diversity of herbs plant in borsad tatuka of Anand dist. There was many worked carried in this district In (1994) Joshi enumerated Khambhat taluka for his Ph.D. thesis on floristic, Phytosociological and ethno botanical study, Now days in borsad.
    [Show full text]
  • Revisiting the Status of Cultivated Plant Species Agrobiodiversity in India: an Overview ANURUDH K SINGH* 2924, Sector-23, Gurgaon, Haryana, India 122 017
    Proc Indian Natn Sci Acad 83 No. 1 March 2017 pp. 151-174 Printed in India. DOI: 10.16943/ptinsa/2016/v82/48406 Review Article Revisiting the Status of Cultivated Plant Species Agrobiodiversity in India: An Overview ANURUDH K SINGH* 2924, Sector-23, Gurgaon, Haryana, India 122 017 (Received on 14 March 2016; Revised on 20 May 2016; Accepted on 16 June 2016) A revisit to the literature on cultivated plant species agrobiodiversity in India revealed that the floristic diversity is represented by 17,926 species of angiosperm, while Indian agriculture cultivates 811 plant species and harbours more than 900 wild relatives of the cultivated plant species distributed over 10 (+ 1) biogeographic regions of the the country, significantly higher than commonly cited in the literature. Further, it revealed the role of Indian communities in domestication to cultivation of around 215 economically important plant species, and adaption of around 600 exotic crop species. Based on new evidence, several species require inclusion and others deletion, and many need further investigations to resolve the issue on country of their origin. Cultivation of crop species in diverse natural and man-made agroecological systems for centuries has generated a huge amount of genetic diversity in a large number of crop species, maintained by the farmers in the form of landraces or farmer’s varieties, and conserved as collections/accessions in the national agricultural research system. Keywords: Agrobiodiversity; Domestication; Cultivation; Genetic Diversity; Wild Relatives
    [Show full text]
  • Phytogeographic Basis Plant Breeding
    PHYTOGEOGRAPHIC BASIS of PLANT BREEDING 1. Local Varieties and Their Significance :— The -varieties of cultivated plants grown in the different regions of the Soviet Union until recently were varieties introduced from various localities and countries, and were inseparable from human migration and colonization. The list of cultivated plants reflects the history of our country in its recent past, it shows the effects of individual peasant farming. In the separate groups and varieties of plants one can trace the routes by which they were brought from Western Europe, the United States, Asia Minor, Mongolia, and Iran. In the pre-revolutionary period, the introduction of new varieties in our country was haphazard. Beginning with the eighteenth century, individual amateur growers and societies unsystemati- cally introduced new varieties from abroad. Sometimes these new varieties were quite valuable but because of the vastness of our country and the com- plete absence of any state-planned system of plant introduction, the imported varieties usually restricted themselves to very limited areas and disappeared. It may be considered that pedigree seed production, in the real meaning of the term, did not exist in our country before the October Revolution. We have just begun a planned distribution of varieties in accordance with the needs of our large-scale socialized and mechanized agricultural economy. Yet, there is no doubt that the varietal materials which were introduced in our country and cultivated for decades and centuries were subjected to natural selection, and also to deliberate or casual artificial selection, and that some local varieties evolved that were ecologically adapted. The proximity of the Soviet Union to the basic centers of origin of numer- ous cultivated plants facilitated the selection of exceptionally valuable forms.
    [Show full text]
  • Synthetic Brassica Napus L.: Development and Studies on Morphological Characters, Yield Attributes, and Yield
    The Scientific World Journal Volume 2012, Article ID 416901, 6 pages The cientificWorldJOURNAL doi:10.1100/2012/416901 Research Article Synthetic Brassica napus L.: Development and Studies on Morphological Characters, Yield Attributes, and Yield M. A. Malek,1, 2 M. R. Ismail,2 M. Y. Rafii,2 and M. Rahman3 1 Plant Breeding Division, Bangladesh Institute of Nuclear Agriculture, Mymensingh 2202, Bangladesh 2 Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 Serdang, Malaysia 3 Department of Plant Science, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58108-6050, USA Correspondence should be addressed to M. A. Malek, [email protected] andM.R.Ismail,[email protected] Received 5 March 2012; Accepted 27 March 2012 Academic Editors: J.-F. Hausman and S. Thewes Copyright © 2012 M. A. Malek et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Brassica napus was synthesized by hybridization between its diploid progenitor species B. rapa and B. oleracea followed by chromosome doubling. Cross with B. rapa as a female parent was only successful. Among three colchicine treatments (0.10, 0.15, and 0.20%), 0.15% gave the highest success (86%) of chromosome doubling in the hybrids (AC; 2n = 19). Synthetic B. napus (AACC, 2n = 38) was identified with bigger petals, fertile pollens and seed setting. Synthetic B. napus had increased growth over parents and exhibited wider ranges with higher coefficients of variations than parents for morphological and yield contributing characters, and yield per plant.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Trigenomic Hexaploid Brassica from Triploid (ABC) Hybrids
    AJCS 7(9):1375-1382 (2013) ISSN:1835-2707 Development of hexaploid Brassica (AABBCC) from hybrids (ABC) of Brassica carinata (BBCC) × B. rapa (AA) M.A. Malek1, 2*, L. Rahman3, M.L. Das1, L. Hassan3, M.Y. Rafii2 and M.R. Ismail2 1Plant Breeding Division, Bangladesh Institute of Nuclear Agriculture, Mymensingh-2202, Bangladesh 2Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM Serdang, Selangor DE, Malaysia 3Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh-2202, Bangladesh *Corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract The aim of this research was to develop Brassica hexaploids from triploid hybrids using colchicine and to study the performances of the developed hexaploids. Triploid hybrids (genome, ABC) developed from crosses between Brassica carinata (genome, BBCC) and B. rapa (genome, AA) were used as source materials for chromosome doubling through colchicine treatment to develop Brassica hexaploids (genome, AABBCC). Modified injection method was found to be more effective than cotton plug method for doubling the chromosome numbers. On an average, the use of 0.10, 0.15 and 0.20% colchicine gave 36.4, 56.0 and 71.8% success in chromosome doubling by modified injection method compared to 27.4, 38.0 and 39.1% success by cotton plug method. First generation (H1) hexaploids produced larger buds and flowers than those of both parents and triploid hybrids. The untreated triploid hybrids did not produce seeds due to having sterile pollens only while hexaploids produced fertile pollens and seeds. On an average, 59% of second generation (H2) hexaploid seeds were euploid, where the rest of 41% seeds were aneuploid.
    [Show full text]
  • Screening In-Vitro Antifungal Activity of Raphanus
    WORLD JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES Younus et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences SJIF Impact Factor 5.210 Volume 4, Issue 11, 429-437 Research Article ISSN 2278 – 4357 SCREENING IN-VITRO ANTIFUNGAL ACTIVITY OF RAPHANUS SATIVUS L. VAR. CAUDATUS. Afshan Siddiq and Ishrat Younus* Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Karachi. *Faculty of Pharmacy, Hamdard University, Karachi. Article Received on ABSTRACT 16 Sep 2015, The aim of present investigation was to evaluate antifungal activity of Revised on 5 Oct 2015, ethanolic extract of Raphanus sativus L. var. caudatus. The antifungal Accepted on 26 Oct 2015 activity using agar disk diffusion method was determined against six fungal strains; Aspergillus niger, Trichphyton rubrum, Microsporum *Correspondence for canis, Fusarium lini, Candida glabrata and Candida albicans. Four Author Ishrat Younus different concentrations (50, 100, 200 and 400μg/ml) of Raphanus Faculty of Pharmacy, caudatus extract and standard drug (Miconazole) were tested against Hamdard University, fungi and zone of growth inhibition were measured. Raphanus Karachi. caudatus exhibited remarkable antifungal activity (p < 0.05) against all fungi at all tested concentrations except Fusarium lini which was inhibited only at higher concentrations (400 and 800μg/ml). It is noted that with increase in concentration, the zones of growth inhibition were also increased. Thus Raphanus caudatus could be a lead for development of antifungal agents in future. KEYWORDS: Raphanus caudatus, ethanolic extract, antifungal activity, Miconazole. INTRODUCTION Medicinal plants are used for various diseases around the globe. In fact, almost all the cultures of world depend upon herbs for primary health care because they are economical, easily available with fewer side effects (Mukhergi et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomic Checklist and Life History, Ecological, and Geographical Data
    Guide to Wild Germplasm of Brassica and Allied Crops (Tribe Brassiceae, Brassiceae): Part I PART I: Taxonomic Checklist and Life History, Ecological, and Geographical Data Part I, Section I of the guide to the wild germplasm of Brassica and allied crops provides a complete checklist of genera, species, subsp./var. in the tribe Brassiceae. It is based on a comprehensive examination of all major floras of the world [see references] and recent taxonomic treatments. Extensive synonymy exists for almost all species in this tribe, with different taxonomists over the last 240 years referring to the same species under different names. A complete list of all Latin binomials and cross references for each species in the tribe would number in the thousands. The list below is therefore selective and only includes synonyms which are most likely to cause confusion to the reader. The following information is provided for each taxon: ACC Y or N whether taxon name is currently accepted SYNONYM OF For ACC=N, the current Latin binomial with which this species name is synonymous TAXON Latin binomial for each taxon (species, subsp. and var.) followed by the name of the taxonomic authority and the reference in which the name was first published. [ACCEPTED NAMES IN BOLD] Part I, Section II of the guide summarizes information on life cycle, growth form, ecology, geography and phytogeographical status for each of the species under its accepted name and is not given separately for subspecies and varieties. Guide to Wild Germplasm of Brassica and Allied Crops (Tribe Brassiceae, Brassiceae): Part I Part I, Section I: Checklist ACC SYNONYM OF TAXON Y Ammosperma cinerea (Desf.) Hook.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 1 of 1
    TITLE PAGE: VOLUME 1 OF 3 CROP GROUPING PETITION – LEAFY VEGETABLES, TECHNICAL AMENDMENT (ADDITION) TO 40 CFR 180.41 (c) AND 180.1 (g) (Alexanders, leaves; Amaranth; Amaranth, bush greens; Amaranth, Chinese; Amaranth, slender; Amaranth, slim; Amaranth, spiny; Amaranth, spleen; Arugula; Aster, Indian; Beet, garden, leaves; Bellflower, Chinese, leaves; Blackjack; Blue ape, leaves; Broccoli raab; Broccoli, Chinese; Cabbage, Abyssinian; Cabbage, Seakale; Cassava, leaves; Cat’s Whiskers; Cham-chwi; Cham-na-mul; Chayote, leaves; Chervil; Chicory, leaves; Chinese cabbage (bok choy); Chinese flat cabbage; Chipilin; Chrysanthemum, corn; Chrysanthemum, edible-leaved; Chrysanthemum, garland; Chrysanthemum, tricolor; Collards; Corn salad; Corn salad, Italian; Cosmos; Cress, American; Cress, Garden; Cress, Upland; Dandelion; Dock; Dol-nam-mul; Ebolo; Endive; Fameflower; Feather cockscomb; Fern, Black lady; Fern, Bracken; Fern, Broad buckler; Fern, Cinnamon; Ferns, Edible (Fiddleheads); Fern, Lady; Fern, Leather; Fern, Mother; Fern, Ostrich; Fern, Vegetable; Fern, Zenmai; Flowering white cabbage (choi sum); Good King Henry; Hanover salad; Huauzontle; Iceplant; Jute; Kabuna; Kale; Kale, branching bush; Kale, Jersey; Kale, marrow-stem; Lamb’s lettuce; Lettuce, bitter; Lettuce, head; Lettuce, leaf; Lettuce, Romaine; Maca; Mizuna; Mustard greens; Mustard, field greens; Mustard, leaf; Mustard, big-stem; Mustard, tuberous rooted Chinese; Orach; Parsley, fresh; Parsley, Italian; Peppergrass; Plantain, buckhorn; Plantain, common; Primrose, English; Purple-stem
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Resources of South-East Asia
    A4 ß/{$$£) -ói~l ttffC\)J€.-c\b~o\ Plant Resources ofSouth-Eas t Asia No 9 Plants yielding non-seed carbohydrates M. Flach and F.Rumawa s (Editors) H Backhuys Publishers, Leiden 1996 PROFESSOR DR M. FLACH graduated in tropical agronomy in 1957 at Wagenin­ gen Agricultural University, where he obtained his doctorate in 1966. From 1957 until 1963 he worked in agricultural extension in New Guinea, in what is now the Indonesian province of Irian. From 1963 onwards he was attached to the Department of Tropical Agronomy at Wageningen Agricultural University in various ranks, becoming full professor and head of department in 1981. He has travelled widely in various capacities, especially in South-East Asia. He has published a number of papers on root and tuber crops and on palms, in­ cluding after his retirement in 1991. DR F. RUMAWAS graduated in 1963 from the Faculty of Agriculture, University of Indonesia. In 1965 he obtained a degree in botany and plant pathology at the University of Kentucky, Lexington, United States, and in 1968 was awarded a PhD in agronomy by Purdue University, Indiana, United States. He is current­ ly a lecturer in agronomy at Bogor Agricultural University, Indonesia, and a senior scientist in charge of sago production at the Indonesian Ministry of Re­ search and Technology. Cip-Data Koninklijke Bibliotheek, Den Haag Plant Plant resources of South-East Asia. - Leiden: Backhuys Publishers. - 111. No. 9: Plants yielding non-seed carbohydrates / M. Flach and F. Rumawas (eds.). With index, ref. ISBN 90-73348-51-X bound NUGI 835 Subject headings: non-seed carbohydrates; South-East Asia.
    [Show full text]
  • Studies on Some Morphological Characters and Yield Attributes of Synthetic Brassica Hexaploids and Their Parents
    African Journal of Biotechnology Vol. 11(57), pp. 12030-12039, 17 July, 2012 Available online at http://www.academicjournals.org/AJB DOI: 10.5897/AJB12.1032 ISSN 1684–5315 ©2012 Academic Journals Full Length Research Paper Studies on some morphological characters and yield attributes of synthetic Brassica hexaploids and their parents M. A. Malek1,3*, L. Rahman2, L. Hassan2, M. I. Uddin1, M. Y. Rafii3 and M. R. Ismail3 1Plant Breeding Division, Bangladesh Institute of Nuclear Agriculture, Bangladesh Agricultural University Campus, Mymensingh-2202, Bangladesh. 2Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh-2202, Bangladesh. 3Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia. Accepted 1 June, 2012 Allopolyploidy plays an important role in plant evolution and confers better advantages on crop growth and breeding compared to low ploidy levels. The present investigation aimed to study the synthetic hexaploid Brassica (AABBCC genome) developed from Brassica cainata (BBCC genome) and Brassica rapa (AA genome) compared to their parental genotypes considering some morphological characters, yield attributes and yield. Increased vegetative growth in hexaploids over their parents was observed. Hexaploids exhibited wider ranges with higher coefficients of variations compared to the parents for all characters studied. Hexaploids had taller plants, higher number of siliqua and larger flowers than those of both parents. Though average pollen fertility in the hexaploids was lower than both parents but out of 420 hexaploids, seventeen had comparatively higher percentages of pollen fertility as well as siliqua setting. Number of seeds per siliqua and siliqua length were found to be lower than their parents. Mean seed weight per plant in the hexaploids was lower than the parents though the hexaploids had higher number of siliquae along with higher seed weight.
    [Show full text]
  • Species and Varieties, Their Origin by Mutation
    BOUGHT WITH THE INCOME FROM THE SAGE ENDOWMENT FUND THE GIFT OF Hetirg W. Sage 1891 .md//>3f. vkmU - 5901 '"' '«n. # Cornell University Library The original of tiiis book is in tine Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924024538062 «ij o,.- .%?*" University Library QH 366.V98 1906 Species and varieties, their origin by 3 1924 024 538 062 species and Varieties Their Origin by Mutation Lectures Delivered at the University of California by Hugo DeVries Professor of Botany in the'^niversity of Amsterdam Edited by Daniel Trembly MacDougal Director Department of Botanical Research, Carnegie Institution of Wasliington Second Edition, Corrected and Revised CHICAGO The Open Court Publishing Company LONDON Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co., Ltd. 1906 QH Copyright 1904 BY The Open Court Pub. Co. Chicago THE ORIGIN OF SPECIES The origin of species is a natural phenomenon. Lamaeok. The origin of species is an ohject of inquiry. Darwin. The origin of species is an ohject of experi- mental investigation. DeVries. PREFACE BY THE AUTHOE The purpose of these lectures is to point out the means and methods by which the origin of species and varieties may become an object for experimental inquiry, in the interest of agricultural and horticultural practice as well as in that of general biologic science. .' Comparative studies have contributed all the evidence hitherto adduced for the support of the Darwinian theory of descent and given us some general ideas about the main lines of the pedigree of the vegetable kingdom, but the way in which one species originates from another has not been ade- quately explained.
    [Show full text]
  • Interspecific and Intergeneric Hybridization Data
    Guide to Wild Germplasm of Brassica and Allied Crops (Tribe Brassiceae, Brassicaceae): Part III PART III. Interspecific and Intergeneric Hybridization Data The following part of the guide to the wild germplasm of Brassica and allied crops summarizes reports of interspecific and intergeneric hybridization with members of the tribe Brassiceae. Artificial intergeneric hybridizations between various members of the tribe have been carried out on a large scale. TABLE 1 represents a summary of the literature compiled on interspecific and intergeneric -cytodeme hybridization between members of the tribe Brassiceae. Taxa are arranged alphabetically (see PART I for taxonomic checklist of the tribe). Information for each cross is provided on whether the hybrid was obtained sexually, or artificially through culturing of either the ovary, ovules, or the embryo, or through protoplast fusion. Crosses cited in Harberd and McArthur (1980) which were prior to 1970 were usually sexual, whereas those obtained by the latter authors commonly involved embryo rescue techniques. Additional references to successful and unsuccessful crosses using sexual or in vitro techniques as well as to experimental F1 and F2 backcrosses can be found in Fitzjohn et al. (2007) and in supplementary appendices attached to its online version. On the basis of chromosome number and crossing ability, Harberd (1976) defined the Brassica coenospecies as "the group of wild species sufficiently related to the six cultivated species of Brassica to be potentially capable of experimental hybridization with them". TABLE 2 provides a summary of the 45 diploid cytodemes or crossing groups and six amphidiploid taxa described for Brassica coenospecies and provides an update to the lists of Harberd (1972, 1976), Harberd and McArthur (1972), Takahata and Hinata (1983).
    [Show full text]