(CN 393, T4) for the Billy Graham Center Archives

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

(CN 393, T4) for the Billy Graham Center Archives This is a complete transcript of the oral history interview with David Howard Adeney (CN 393, T4) for the Billy Graham Center Archives. No spoken words that were recorded are omitted. In a very few cases, the transcribers could not understand what was said, in which case [unclear] was inserted. Also, grunts and verbal hesitations such as “ah” or “um” are usually omitted. Readers of this transcript should remember that this is a transcript of spoken English, which follows a different rhythm and even rule than written English. Three dots indicate an interruption or break in the train of thought within the sentence of the speaker. Four dots indicate what the transcriber believes to be the end of an incomplete sentence. ( ) Word in parentheses are asides made by the speaker. [ ] Words in brackets are comments made by the transcriber. This transcription was made by Katherine Elwell and Paul Ericksen, and completed in October 1990. Please note: Underlined text in brackets [text] denotes a written addition made by Adeney to add clarity. No subtractions have been made from the spoken record. Please note: This oral history interview expresses the personal memories and opinions of the interviewee and does not necessarily represent the views or policies of the Billy Graham Center Archives or Wheaton College. BGC Archives CN 393, T4 Transcript - Page 2 Collection 393, Tape 4. Oral history interview with David Adeney by Paul Ericksen on November 14, 1988. ERICKSEN: You were discussing the popularity of the...the meetings once the communists had taken control. How long were they allowed to meet freely? ADENEY: Well, the first year in Shanghai. And...and you've got to recognize that Shanghai was different from other...other cities. There was much more freedom in Shanghai than in...than in other places. Beijing probably also. They...they [student meetings] continued quite strongly there [in Shanghai]. And [pauses] we had our fellowship meetings every week in...we had two houses which were Inter-Varsity Fellowship houses and the students met in these houses. At first they continued to have meetings on the campus, but gradually things tightened up on the campus, and they weren't able...they weren't able to have the meetings actually on campus. But they...they met in the fellowship house. And [pauses] as the time went on the pressures on the students politically were tremendous. Every student was in a political group. Every student had to write his or her life story again and again and had to discuss it with the group to...to which the student belonged. And they were going to endless political meetings, endless discussion groups, and the criticism of Christians was increasing. And [pauses] so that some students gave up and couldn't stand the strain. And so they were...the fellowship meetings were designed to strengthen the students, to help them to stand firm and to pray for those who were giving away under the...under the stress. And there were testimonies of...of God's help. And...and we would hear of students getting into trouble. Like we heard of one group where the students, because they said grace at meals, were told that if they asked God...thanked God for their food, then they should not require a scholarship. And pretty well all the students were on scholarship. And so the students were praying for these students and taking an offering to try and help...help them carry on when they lost their scholarship. So this kind of thing was...was going on all the time. And some of the students were quite active in...in their witness. The students in one university produced a little tract, which they called...it had...the outside of it was AD, because the communists changed the dating...the AD/BC. And up to the...up to the coming of the communists everything was dated according to the Sun Yet Sen revolution in 1911. So that 19...1940...49 [1949] would have been 19...it would have been 38...the...[from] the year of the...of the...of the nationalist revolution. And [But] now it was...[the communists] had gone back to the...to the whole world wide dating. And so they did a little tract with...with 19...19...I think it was 1950, and...on the...on the front and it describing how everything now is dated according to the coming of Christ. And [pauses] things like that were...were still being done. The...the students were still having evangelistic meetings. And...and yet it was becoming increasingly difficult, and there was the strain of knowing what the attitude should be. Like a student said to me, “We've got to go out on these parades.” There were endless parades and you'd hear the beating of the drums and the music of the... [unclear] [of the Yang-guo]...there was a particular dance that was being performed right across the city, and everybody was doing this dance and the particular music connected...connected with it [was very popular]. And then the students would go out on parade and they'd have to shout slogans and they would have to sing patriotic songs. And the students said, “Well, if the song is [clears throat] against America it doesn't matter. We can...we can sing...sing that. But then when it ends with 'Our eternal liberator, Mao Tse Tung, our eternal liberator, our savior,' we can't sing that,” you see. And these were the questions that used to come up to the students. © 2018. The Billy Graham Center Archives. All rights reserved. This transcript may be reused with the following publication credit: Used by permission of the Billy Graham Center Archives, Wheaton College, Wheaton, IL. BGC Archives CN 393, T4 Transcript - Page 3 ERICKSEN: So how were students coping with that situation? ADENEY: Well, in...in many cases, I mean that's...they would...they would...they would join in with what...what they could. And [pauses] on the whole they were quite enthusiastic about working with the...with the government. I mean, you have the great rallies of students with banners everywhere: “Go where the revolution needs you most.” And students were being sent out to serve the people [clears throat], and go[ing] into the countryside and bring[ing] help to the farmers and...and that kind of thing. And the Christian students would join in that, and they'd go...go for that. But [pauses] where they had their difficulties was in the discussion groups, where they couldn't accept the Marxist view of life. And...and they...and that [this] sometimes led to them being struggled against, because the...they...they had the...what they called [they had to join] the “Xuch-xi xiao-dzu,” which was the indoctrination meetings. And the...one girl, I remember, was very much afraid of these indoctrination meetings, because they were really tough times for the students. But the Lord strengthened her, and she said, “Now I don't call it my 'Xuch-xi xiao-dzu,' my 'education small group.' I call it my 'budao xiao-dzu,' my 'evangelism small group'“ [chuckles]. [Sound of approaching/passing train] And [pauses] so they...they...they took advantage to witness in some...some cases. There was the...the...the...what...what they called [pauses] “mutual criticism.” There was “dzi-wo piping,” which was individual criticism, when they criticized themselves. And they...they had to produce these criticisms of their past thinking, how wrong they'd been. And this had to be written out and then read to the rest of the group, and then the others would criticize it in turn. And this was “husiang-piping,” mutual criticism, where they criticized each other. And then, if they didn't respond properly, they made...might be the object of...of “dou-zheng,” which is struggle, when one person would be put up and the others would accuse him and struggle against him in order to change his...his thinking. And this was going on in every campus right across [the country]. And later on it was introduced to the churches, and these criticism meetings were started in the churches, and the Christians were expected to criticize each other, those who were backward in their thinking, and so on. ERICKSEN: What was the attitude in the groups toward people who [pauses] couldn't stand up to the pressure and would renounce their faith or buy into Marxism or...? ADENEY: [Pauses] The...the attitude of Christians? I would say it was mainly of sorrow and concern and praying that they might come back, those who had failed. And there were quite a lot who did fail. And sometimes you would even see testimonies in the newspapers of students who had given up their faith, and...and they were...they were published as...as “those who'd seen the light.” And there were even a kind of evangelistic meetings in reverse, where the communists would say, “Now how many of you've been to Christian schools?” And...and they would...they would...they would lecture them. And then they'd say, “How many of you have seen the light and...and have seen how wrong you've been in your beliefs?” And...and then they'd say, “Now how many of you are prepared to go out and fight against these evil superstitions?” Just like an evangelistic meeting. So...but I...in those first years of the revolution there was still a great deal of enthusiasm among the Christians for their faith.
Recommended publications
  • Evangelical Review of Theology
    EVANGELICAL REVIEW OF THEOLOGY VOLUME 12 Volume 12 • Number 1 • January 1988 Evangelical Review of Theology Articles and book reviews original and selected from publications worldwide for an international readership for the purpose of discerning the obedience of faith GENERAL EDITOR: SUNAND SUMITHRA Published by THE PATERNOSTER PRESS for WORLD EVANGELICAL FELLOWSHIP Theological Commission p. 2 ISSN: 0144–8153 Vol. 12 No. 1 January–March 1988 Copyright © 1988 World Evangelical Fellowship Editorial Address: The Evangelical Review of Theology is published in January, April, July and October by the Paternoster Press, Paternoster House, 3 Mount Radford Crescent, Exeter, UK, EX2 4JW, on behalf of the World Evangelical Fellowship Theological Commission, 57, Norris Road, P.B. 25005, Bangalore—560 025, India. General Editor: Sunand Sumithra Assistants to the Editor: Emmanuel James and Beena Jacob Committee: (The Executive Committee of the WEF Theological Commission) Peter Kuzmič (Chairman), Michael Nazir-Ali (Vice-Chairman), Don Carson, Emilio A. Núñez C., Rolf Hille, René Daidanso, Wilson Chow Editorial Policy: The articles in the Evangelical Review of Theology are the opinions of the authors and reviewers and do not necessarily represent those of the Editor or Publisher. Subscriptions: Subscription details appear on page 96 p. 3 2 Editorial Christ, Christianity and the Church As history progresses and the historical Jesus becomes more distant, every generation has the right to (and must) question his contemporary relevance—and hence also that of Christianity and the Church. The articles and book reviews in this issue generally deal with this relevance. Of the three, of course the questions about Jesus Christ are the basic ones.
    [Show full text]
  • The Weekly Prayer Meeting
    Websites www.reformation-today.org The editor's personal website is http://www.errollhulse.com http://africanpastorsconference.com Th e photo above was taken at the SOLAS Conference in the Ntherlands (see page2). From lefi to right Bert Boer (pastor of a Baptist church in Deventer), Jeroen Bo! (chairman of the Geo1ge Whitefield Foundation), Gijs de Bree (pastor of a Baptist church in Kampen), Erroll Hulse, George van der Hoff (pastor of a Baptist church in Ede), Kees van Kralingen (elder of a Baptist church in Papendrecht), Erik Bouman (pastor of a Baptist church in Genk, Belgium), Michael Gorsira (pastor of a Baptist church in Delfz.ijl - also chairman of the Sola 5 Baptist committee) and Oscar Lohuis (itinerant preacher). 'THE GIFT' Readers of the previous two issues of Reformation Today wi ll be interested to learn that Chapel Library have published a 16 page booklet summarising the life and conversion of Charles Chiniquy. Free copies of this booklet are available to readers of Reformation Today. Please contact Chapel Libra1y directly if you live in the USA. .. (Chapel Library; 2603 W. Wright St., Pensacola, FL 32505; [email protected]). Other readers should contact Frederick Hodgson (See back inside cover). Front cover picture - Stephen Nowak preaching at a meeting in Tan zania (see report page 31). ii Editorial In a parish church near Berthelsdorf, Germany, during a special Wednesday 1 morning service, 13 " August 1727, there was an outpouring of the Holy Spirit. Paiiicipants left that meeting, 'hardly knowing whether they belonged to earth or had already gone to heaven'. One of them wrote, 'A great hunger after the Word of God took possession of us so that we had to have three services every day 5.00 am and 7.30 am and 9.00 pm.' The outstanding zeal for missionary work by the Moravians, as they became known, is described in the article Moravians and Missionary Passion.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of Bishop Ting Kuanghsün's Theological Reconstruction in China
    A Study of Bishop Ting Kuanghsün’s Theological Reconstruction in China A thesis submitted to the University of Manchester for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Humanities. 2012 An Chu Tee School of Arts, Histories and Cultures Contents List of Abbreviations 4 Abstract 6 Declaration 7 Copyright Statement 8 A Note on Romanization of Chinese Words and Places 9 Introduction 10 1 The last Anglican bishop in post-denominational China: K.H. Ting and the development of Three-Self theology 10 2 Promoting a theology with ‘Chinese characteristics’ 22 3 Ting’s theology in a Three-Self framework 30 4 Outline of the dissertation 37 Chapter One : Three-Self idea in Pre-1949 Chinese Theology 45 1 The original Three-Self idea 40 2 Early Three-Self efforts 49 3 Early independent churches 54 4 Towards an indigenous theology in pre-1949 China 64 Chapter Two: Three-Self idea in post-1949 Chinese theology 73 1 Three-Self as the slogan of patriotism 71 2 The establishment of Three-Self Patriotic Movement 77 3 Christians in the Cultural Revolution Era 94 Chapter Three: Retrospect and prospect of Three-Self Movement 101 1 The changing of the political climate 98 2 Defense of the necessity of Three-Self Movement in the 1950s 107_Toc166903682 Chapter Four: Towards a Chinese Theological Reconstructions 119 1 A synthetic model 115 2 An anthropological model 117 3 A praxis model 122 2 Chapter Five: Remarks of Ting’s Theological Reconstruction 145 1 Broaden the Three-Self theological range 140 2 Seeking the common ground 147 3 Hermeneutic tasks 153 Conclusion 169 Glossary of Chinese Terms 173 Glossary of Chinese Names Mentioned in the Text 17 6 Bibliography 179 Appendix 204 Inspirations from Liberation Theology, Process Theology and Teilhard de Chardin – K.H.
    [Show full text]
  • David Paton --- Christian Missiomissionn Encounters Communism in China"
    THE HENRY MARTYN LECTURES 2007 "David Paton --- Christian MissioMissionn Encounters Communism in China" by Prof. Peter Tze Ming Ng LECTURE 2: Tuesday 6th February 2007 INTRODUCTION In this second lecture, I shall focus on my reflections of the work of David Paton, Christian Mission and the Judgment of God (London: SCM Press, First edition in 1953). When I came to Cambridge as a visiting fellow in the fall of 2005, I was asked to lead a discussion group at this Divinity Faculty. I was glad to know that amongst the reading list, Paton's book was on the required list for all M.Phil. students of World Christianity. The book was reprinted by Wm B. Eerdmans Publishing Co. in October 1996, with an introduction by Rev. Bob Whyte and a foreword by Bishop K.H. Ting. They both have endorsed Paton's view from the experiences of Chinese Churches in the past forty years. Bob Whyte said that many of Paton's reflections remained of immediate relevance today and the issues he perceived as important in 1953 were still central to the future Christianity in China. Bishop Ting also affirmed that his book was a book of prophetic vision and Paton was a gift of God to the worldwide church. Dr. Gerald H. Anderson, the director of Overseas Ministries Study Centre at New Haven (USA) further remarked, saying: "To have this classic available again is timely- even better with the new foreword by Bishop K.H. Ting. [1] So Paton's work was still worth re-visiting, and I decided to read it again for this lecture.
    [Show full text]
  • Protestant Ecumenism and Theology in China Since Edinburgh 1910’
    © Chow, A. (2014). ‘Protestant Ecumenism and Theology in China Since Edinburgh 1910’. Missiology: An International Review. 10.1177/0091829613501965 Protestant Ecumenism and Theology in China Since Edinburgh 1910 by Alexander Chow1 Ecumenical theology traditionally focuses on clarifying diverse opinions on core matters of the faith. But from its inception in China, ecumenism has been heavily influenced by its sociopolitical concerns. This article explores ecumenism’s goal of church unity in Chinese Protestantism since Edinburgh 1910. Two early attempts sought to speak to the concerns of foreign denominationalism and imperialism. In the 1980s, a third attempt occurred within the government-sanctioned church. This would be complicated by the prevalence of house churches and theological studies among secular academics. How does this trifurcation of Christian activity affect the goals of Chinese Protestant ecumenism? Introduction Robert Morrison was the first Protestant missionary to China in 1807. Though his efforts saw few converts, Morrison inaugurated an enterprise that came into full force during the so-called “Opium Wars” of the mid- to late-19th century. Missionaries would then enter China on the heels of war and conquest, and foreign powers began using bilingual missionaries and converts as translators. Hence, at an early stage, Christianity was seen as a partner of imperialism. In 1900, the Boxer Rebellion waged a war against imperialism and Christianity, leading to the death of several hundred foreign missionaries and tens of thousands of Chinese Christians – the latter of whom were treated as traitors (Latourette 1929:501-519). Since the Chinese government was unwilling and unable to control the situation, eight foreign nations brought military forces together and 1 Alexander Chow has written several articles on Christian theology in China and East Asia, and is the author of Theosis, Sino-Christian Theology and the Second Chinese Enlightenment, published through Palgrave Macmillan in 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • A Broken System: Failures of the Religious Regulatory System in the People’S Republic of China Carl Hollan
    BYU Law Review Volume 2014 | Issue 3 Article 11 April 2014 A Broken System: Failures of the Religious Regulatory System in the People’s Republic of China Carl Hollan Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/lawreview Part of the Religion Law Commons Recommended Citation Carl Hollan, A Broken System: Failures of the Religious Regulatory System in the People’s Republic of China, 2014 BYU L. Rev. 733 (2014). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/lawreview/vol2014/iss3/11 This Comment is brought to you for free and open access by the Brigham Young University Law Review at BYU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in BYU Law Review by an authorized editor of BYU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DO NOT DELETE 8/17/2015 8:07 PM A Broken System: Failures of the Religious Regulatory System in the People’s Republic of China* The system for regulating religion in the People’s Republic of China (“PRC” or “China”) has faced increasing domestic and international criticism in recent years.1 However, there has been little, if any, improvement in the regulation or protection of religious freedoms in the PRC during the past decades.2 This failure to act in the face of increased criticism and international pressure has been attributed to the continued policy of the Communist Party of China (“CPC” or “Party”) to bring religious organizations under its control.3 This Comment will show that the current system of religious regulation not only fails to promote internationally recognized principles of religious freedom, but also is counterproductive to CPC and PRC interests as it contributes to the * An early draft of this Comment was partially adopted for publication in another work with the help of additional authors.
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACT Multiple Modernizations, Religious Regulations and Church
    ABSTRACT Multiple Modernizations, Religious Regulations and Church Responses: The Rise and Fall of Three “Jerusalems” in Communist China Zhifeng Zhong, Ph.D. Mentor: William A. Mitchell, Ph.D. There is an extensive literature on modernization, regulation and religious change from a global perspective. However, China is usually understudied by the scholars. Numerous studies tackle the puzzle of the rising of Christianity and its implications in China. However they fail to synthesize the multiple dynamics and diverse regional difference. This dissertation approaches the development of Christianity in contemporary China from a regional perspective. By doing a case study on twelve churches in three prefecture cities (Guangzhou, Wenzhou and Nanyang), I examine how different historical processes and factors interacted to shape the uneven development of Christianity under the communist rule. The main research questions are: How did Protestantism survive, transform and flourish under a resilient communism regime? What factors account for the regional variance of the transformation of Christianity? I argue that there are multiple modernizations in China, and they created various cultural frames in the regions. Although the party-state tried to eliminate religion, Protestantism not only survived, but transformed and revived in the Cultural Revolution, which laid the foundation for momentum growth in the reform era. The development of Protestantism in China is dynamic, path-dependent, and contingent on specific settings. Different modernizations, religious regulation, historical legacy and church responses led to the rise and fall of three “Jerusalems” in communist China. Copyright © 2013 by Zhifeng Zhong All rights reserved TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ..................................................................................................... iv LIST OF TABLES .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Taylor & Francis Not for Distribution
    Template: Royal A, Font: , Date: 12/04/2012; 3B2 version: 9.1.470/W Unicode (Jun 2 2008) (APS_OT) Dir: P:/eProduction/WIP/9780415536301/dtp/9780415536301.3d Proof The Routledge International Handbook of Religious Education How and what to teach about religion is controversial in every country. The Routledge International Handbook of Religious Education is the first book to comprehensively address the range of ways that major countries around the world teach religion in public and private educational institutions. It discusses how three models in particular seem to dominate the landscape. Countries with strong cultural traditions focused on a majority religion tend to adopt an “identification model,” where instructionTaylor is provided only in the tenets& ofFrancis the majority religion, often to the detriment of other religions and their adherents. Countries with traditions that differentiate church and state tend to adopt a “separation model,” thus either offering instruction in a wide range of religions, or in some cases teachingNot very little for about religion, distribution intentionally leaving it to religious institutions and the home setting to provide religious instruction. Still other countries attempt “managed plural- ism,” in which neither one, nor many, but, rather, a limited handful of major religious traditions are taught. Inevitably, there are countries that do not fit any of these dominant models, and the range of methods touched upon in this book will surprise even the most enlightened reader. Religious instruction by educational institutions in 53 countries and regions of the world are explored by experts native to each country. These chapters discuss: Legal parameters in terms of subjective versus objective instruction in religion.
    [Show full text]
  • Origins of the Three-Self Patriotic Movement
    Origins of the Three-Self Patriotic Movement: John Livingston Nevius Caleb Seibel HIST 586A Professor Mulready-Stone December 14, 2011 Copyright 2011 By Caleb Seibel Kansas State University All rights reserved ABSTRACT This is a historical analysis of the missionary methods introduced to China during the nineteenth century by John Livingston Nevius and his work’s influence on the Three-Self Patriotic Movement (TSPM). This study covers the old system of missions and why Nevius sought to change them. It also discusses the three-self idea as implemented by Nevius as a means to strengthen the Church in China. The paper then addresses how the TSPM later used many of the same ideas introduced by Nevius. Finally, this study demonstrates that Chinese Protestants adopted the three-self idea with the goal of reinforcing the church’s position in China while the new communist government hoped the same ideas would hasten the decline of Protestantism in China. Origins of the Three-Self Patriotic Movement: John Livingston Nevius Shortly after establishing the People’s Republic of China in 1949, the new communist government placed the Three-Self Patriotic Movement (TSPM) in charge of all Protestant churches in China.1 This organization proclaimed the idea of a three-self church, meaning it wanted the Chinese Church to become self-supporting, self-governing, and self-propagating, corresponding to the areas of church finances, administration, and evangelism respectively.2 As the organization that, at least nominally, represents all the Protestant churches in China and supervises those churches for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), the TSPM has played an important and controversial role in China’s recent history.3 Its importance is most evident in the growth of Protestant Christianity in China.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tree with Good Fruit Or Bad Fruit: an Evaluation of the House Church
    Digital Commons @ George Fox University Seminary Masters Theses Theses and Dissertations 3-1-2016 The rT ee with Good Fruit or Bad Fruit: An Evaluation of the House Church Movement and The Three-Self Patriotic Movement in China JiYing Song George Fox University, [email protected] This research is a product of the Master of Divinity (MDiv) program at George Fox University. Find out more about the program. Recommended Citation Song, JiYing, "The rT ee with Good Fruit or Bad Fruit: An Evaluation of the House Church Movement and The Three-Self Patriotic Movement in China" (2016). Seminary Masters Theses. Paper 25. http://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/seminary_masters/25 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Digital Commons @ George Fox University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Seminary Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ George Fox University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. George Fox University The Tree with Good Fruit or Bad Fruit: An Evaluation of the House Church Movement and The Three-Self Patriotic Movement in China A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of George Fox Evangelical Seminary in Candidacy for the Degree of Master of Divinity George Fox Evangelical Seminary by Jiying Song Portland, Oregon March 2016 Copyright © 2016 by Jiying Song All rights reserved ii Contents Acknowledgements iv Abbreviations vi Abstract vii Chapter 1. Introduction and Methodology 1 Chapter 2. Historical Background 7 Chapter 3. The Three-Self Patriotic Movement 22 Chapter 4. The House Church Movement 48 Chapter 5. Conclusion 71 Bibliography 76 iii Acknowledgements This thesis would not have been possible without the support from my family, friends, and faculty of George Fox Evangelical Seminary.
    [Show full text]
  • Mark W. Kelley 1
    Mark W. Kelley 1 Missionary Marriage and Civil War: George Kelley and Eugenia Wan in China, 1935-1950 Mark W. Kelley North Carolina State University Humanities Faculty Mentor David D. Ambaras North Carolina State University After World War II, the Chinese Communist Party gained the advantage in the Chinese Civil War, and the religious intolerance and xenophobia espoused by the emerging communist regime caused Western Christian missionaries to permanently abandon the evangelical effort.1 A number of career missionaries who evacuated the country in the postwar years struggled to sever their personal and professional ties with China and Chinese Christians. One such career missionary, George Maryland Kelley, experienced severe psychological trauma as political and social conditions pressured him to flee his home in Canton. Kelley, an American Pentecostal evangelist, had arrived in China in 1910 at age 22 and spent most of the next forty years there. After he buried his first wife, an American, in China in the 1920s, Kelley resolved to live and die in China. He committed himself wholly to evangelism and social good works, investing himself so deeply in China and Chinese culture that in 1935 he married a Chinese Christian preacher, Eugenia Wan. Together the couple preached the Gospel throughout China, counseling government officials, converting university students, and caring for victims of the Chinese Civil War. After a decade of joint evangelism, Kelley and Eugenia started a family. They adopted a Chinese infant girl in 1946, and then they had a son in 1948. Kelley‟s roots in China had grown ever deeper over the decades, but oppressive conditions for foreign missionaries and direct communist threats compelled him to plan to take his family to safety.
    [Show full text]
  • Communism and Christianity: Missionaries and the Communist
    COMMUNISM AND CHRISTIANITY: MISSIONARIES AND THE COMMUNIST SEIZURE OF POWER IN CHINA By Stephen Harrison Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Vanderbilt University in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In History December 2013 Nashville, Tennessee Approved: Thomas A. Schwartz, Ph.D. James P. Byrd, Ph.D. Sarah Igo, Ph.D. Paul Kramer, Ph.D. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Chapter Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 1 1. The Changing Nature of Protestant Missions in China in the First Half of the 20th Century ............................................................................................................................... 17 2. Protestants will be Protestants: The Split of Missionary Opinion on the Chinese Civil War ........................................................................................................................... 56 3. Communist or Nationalist: Asking the Wrong Question .................................................. 90 4. Success of Failure: Missionaries Debate Their Legacy .................................................. 134 5. "Losing to the Cold War Consensus: The Marginalization of Dissenting American Missionaries in China in the 1950s" ............................................................................... 174 Conclusion .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]