DOCSLIB.ORG

Lithium Resource Estimate

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lithium Resource Estimate E3 Metals Corporation NI 43-101 Inferred Lithium Resource Estimate NI 43-101 TECHNICAL REPORT LITHIUM RESOURCE ESTIMATE for the CENTRAL CLEARWATER PROPERTY SOUTH-CENTRAL ALBERTA, CANADA Prepared for E3 METALS CORPORATION #205 - 227 10th St NW Calgary, AB T2N 1V5 Prepared by: Raymond P. Spanjers MS, P.Geo, QP, Independent Consultant Gordon MacMillan, P.Geo, QP, Fluid Domains Wayne Monnery, P.Eng, QP, Independent Consultant Report Date: December 8, 2017 Effective Date: October 27, 2017 1 Alberta Petro-Lithium Project, Alberta, Canada E3 Metals Corporation NI 43-101 Inferred Lithium Resource Estimate Table of Contents LIST OF FIGURES .................................................................................................................................5 LIST OF TABLES ..................................................................................................................................6 1 SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................................7 2 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 10 2.1 TERMS OF REFERENCE .......................................................................................................................... 10 2.2 SOURCES OF DATA ............................................................................................................................... 10 2.3 SITE VISIT ........................................................................................................................................... 10 3 RELIANCE ON OTHER EXPERTS ....................................................................................................... 10 4 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION ....................................................................................... 11 4.1 LOCATION .......................................................................................................................................... 11 4.2 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION ....................................................................................................................... 12 4.3 ROYALTIES .......................................................................................................................................... 14 4.4 ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES ....................................................................................................................... 15 5 ACCESSIBILITY, CLIMATE, LOCAL RESOURCES, INFRASTRUCTURE AND PHYSIOGRAPHY .................... 15 5.1 ACCESSIBILITY ..................................................................................................................................... 15 5.2 CLIMATE ............................................................................................................................................ 16 5.3 LOCAL RESOURCES ............................................................................................................................... 17 5.4 INFRASTRUCTURE................................................................................................................................. 17 5.5 PHYSIOGRAPHY ................................................................................................................................... 18 6 HISTORY........................................................................................................................................ 18 6.1 OIL DRILLING HISTORY .......................................................................................................................... 18 6.2 WELL LOGS ........................................................................................................................................ 19 6.3 DRILL STEM TESTS ............................................................................................................................... 19 6.4 PRODUCTION, INJECTION AND DISPOSAL .................................................................................................. 20 6.5 HISTORICAL LITHIUM DATA ................................................................................................................... 20 7 GEOLOGICAL SETTING AND MINERALIZATION ................................................................................ 21 7.1 GEOLOGICAL SETTING ........................................................................................................................... 21 7.2 PRECAMBRIAN BASEMENT..................................................................................................................... 26 7.3 PHANEROZOIC STRATA ......................................................................................................................... 26 7.4 QUATERNARY GEOLOGY........................................................................................................................ 27 7.5 STRUCTURAL HISTORY .......................................................................................................................... 28 7.6 MINERALIZATION ................................................................................................................................. 28 7.6.1 Occurrence ............................................................................................................................... 28 8 DEPOSIT TYPES .............................................................................................................................. 29 9 EXPLORATION ............................................................................................................................... 29 2 Alberta Petro-Lithium Project, Alberta, Canada E3 Metals Corporation NI 43-101 Inferred Lithium Resource Estimate 9.1 SAMPLE WELLS ................................................................................................................................... 30 9.2 FIELD SAMPLING .................................................................................................................................. 30 10 DRILLING ..................................................................................................................................... 32 11 SAMPLE PREPARATION, ANALYSES AND SECURITY ....................................................................... 32 11.1 SAMPLE PREPARATION AND SECURITY ................................................................................................... 32 11.2 ANALYSES......................................................................................................................................... 33 11.2.1 Standards and Blanks ............................................................................................................. 33 11.2.2 Duplicate Analysis .................................................................................................................. 33 11.2.3 Sampling Program Results ..................................................................................................... 35 12 DATA VERIFICATION .................................................................................................................... 37 13 MINERAL PROCESSING AND METALLURGICAL TESTING ................................................................. 38 13.1 METALLURGICAL TESTING ................................................................................................................... 38 13.1.1 Extraction Technology Summary ............................................................................................ 38 13.2 NA2CO3 PRE-TREATMENT ................................................................................................................. 39 13.3 SUMMARY OF THE TENOVA PROCESS..................................................................................................... 40 13.4 ASSUMPTIONS AND RISKS.................................................................................................................... 41 14 MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATE.................................................................................................... 41 14.1 RESERVOIR GEOLOGY ......................................................................................................................... 42 14.1.1 Reservoir Geometry ................................................................................................................ 42 14.1.2 Hydrostratigraphic Units ........................................................................................................ 43 14.1.3 Structure and Thickness ......................................................................................................... 44 14.2 RESERVOIR PROPERTIES ...................................................................................................................... 47 14.2.1 Reservoir Pressure .................................................................................................................. 47 14.2.2 Reservoir Permeability ........................................................................................................... 48 14.2.3 Reservoir Porosity................................................................................................................... 50 14.2.4 Storage Estimates of Reservoir ............................................................................................... 51 14.3 ESTIMATE OF WATER PRODUCTION .....................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Characterization of Geothermal Reservoir Units in Northwestern
    PROCEEDINGS, Thirty-Eighth Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering Stanford University, Stanford, California, February 11-13, 2013 SGP-TR-198 CHARACTERIZATION OF GEOTHERMAL RESERVOIR UNITS IN NORTHWESTERN ALBERTA BY 3D STRUCTURAL GEOLOGICAL MODELLING AND ROCK PROPERTY MAPPING BASED ON 2D SEISMIC AND WELL DATA Simon N. Weides1, Inga S. Moeck2, Douglas R. Schmitt2, Jacek A. Majorowicz2, Elahe P. Ardakani2 1 Helmholtz Centre Potsdam GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Telegrafenberg, 14473 Potsdam, Germany 2 University of Alberta, 11322-89 Ave., Edmonton, AB, Canada e-mail: [email protected] the south-western part of the study area its temperature ABSTRACT is above 70 °C and the effective porosity is estimated with 10 % to 15 %. Foreland basins such as the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin (WCSB) host a variety of geoenergy Geothermal heat could play a role as energy source for resources. Often, the focus is on hydrocarbon resources district heating. In energy intensive in-situ oil sands but in times of discussions about climate change and extraction processes geothermal heat could be used for environmental aspects, additional green energy preheating of water for steam production. This would resources are under examination. This study explores lower the amount of natural gas used in oil sands Paleozoic formations in the north western WCSB with production and reduce climate gas emissions. regard to their usability as geothermal reservoirs. The study focuses on an area around Peace River in north – western Alberta. This research site covers an area of INTRODUCTION approx. 90 km * 70 km with a basin depth of 1.7 km to 2.4 km.
    [Show full text]
  • Municipal Guide
    Municipal Guide Planning for a Healthy and Sustainable North Saskatchewan River Watershed Cover photos: Billie Hilholland From top to bottom: Abraham Lake An agricultural field alongside Highway 598 North Saskatchewan River flowing through the City of Edmonton Book design and layout by Gwen Edge Municipal Guide: Planning for a Healthy and Sustainable North Saskatchewan River Watershed prepared for the North Saskatchewan Watershed Alliance by Giselle Beaudry Acknowledgements The North Saskatchewan Watershed Alliance would like to thank the following for their generous contributions to this Municipal Guide through grants and inkind support. ii Municipal Guide: Planning for a Healthy and Sustainable North Saskatchewan Watershed Acknowledgements The North Saskatchewan Watershed Alliance would like to thank the following individuals who dedicated many hours to the Municipal Guide project. Their voluntary contributions in the development of this guide are greatly appreciated. Municipal Guide Steering Committee Andrew Schoepf, Alberta Environment Bill Symonds, Alberta Municipal Affairs David Curran, Alberta Environment Delaney Anderson, St. Paul & Smoky Lake Counties Doug Thrussell, Alberta Environment Gabrielle Kosmider, Fisheries and Oceans Canada George Turk, Councillor, Lac Ste. Anne County Graham Beck, Leduc County and City of Edmonton Irvin Frank, Councillor, Camrose County Jolee Gillies,Town of Devon Kim Nielsen, Clearwater County Lorraine Sawdon, Fisheries and Oceans Canada Lyndsay Waddingham, Alberta Municipal Affairs Murray Klutz, Ducks
    [Show full text]
  • Antler Lake State of the Watershed Report
    Antler Lake State of the Watershed Report October 2019 i Antler Lake State of the Watershed Report North Saskatchewan Watershed Alliance 202 –9440 49th Street NW Edmonton, AB T6B 2M9 (587) 525‐6820 Email: [email protected] http://www.nswa.ab.ca The NSWA gratefully acknowledges operational funding support received from the Government of Alberta and many municipal partners. The North Saskatchewan Watershed Alliance (NSWA) is a non‐profit society whose purpose is to protect and improve water quality and ecosystem functioning in the North Saskatchewan River watershed in Alberta. The organization is guided by a Board of Directors composed of member organizations from within the watershed. It is the designated Watershed Planning and Advisory Council (WPAC) for the North Saskatchewan River under the Government of Alberta’s Water for Life Strategy. This report was prepared by Michelle Gordy, Ph.D., David Trew, B.Sc., Denika Piggott B.Sc., Breda Muldoon, M.Sc., and J. Leah Kongsrude, M.Sc. of the North Saskatchewan Watershed Alliance. Cover photo credit: Kate Caldwell Suggested Citation: North Saskatchewan Watershed Alliance (NSWA), 2019. Antler Lake State of the Watershed Report. Prepared for the Antler Lake Stewardship Committee (ALSC) Antler Lake State of the Watershed Report Executive Summary The Antler Lake Stewardship Committee (ALSC) formed in 2015 to address issues related to lake health. Residents at the lake expressed concerns about deteriorating water quality, blue‐green algal (cyanobacteria1) blooms, proliferation of aquatic vegetation, and low lake levels. In 2016, the Antler Lake Stewardship Committee approached the North Saskatchewan Watershed Alliance (NSWA) to prepare a State of the Watershed report.
    [Show full text]
  • An Investigation of the Interrelationships Among
    AN INVESTIGATION OF THE INTERRELATIONSHIPS AMONG STREAMFLOW, LAKE LEVELS, CLIMATE AND LAND USE, WITH PARTICULAR REFERENCE TO THE BATTLE RIVER BASIN, ALBERTA A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements For the Degree of Master of Science in the Department of Civil Engineering by Ross Herrington Saskatoon, Saskatchewan c 1980. R. Herrington ii The author has agreed that the Library, University of Ssskatchewan, may make this thesis freely available for inspection. Moreover, the author has agreed that permission be granted by the professor or professors who supervised the thesis work recorded herein or, in their absence, by the Head of the Department or the Dean of the College in which the thesis work was done. It is understood that due recognition will be given to the author of this thesis and to the University of Saskatchewan in any use of the material in this thesiso Copying or publication or any other use of the thesis for financial gain without approval by the University of Saskatchewan and the author's written permission is prohibited. Requests for permission to copy or to make any other use of material in this thesis in whole or in part should be addressed to: Head of the Department of Civil Engineering Uni ve:rsi ty of Saskatchewan SASKATOON, Canada. iii ABSTRACT Streamflow records exist for the Battle River near Ponoka, Alberta from 1913 to 1931 and from 1966 to the present. Analysis of these two periods has indicated that streamflow in the month of April has remained constant while mean flows in the other months have significantly decreased in the more recent period.
    [Show full text]
  • (Foram in Ifers, Algae) and Stratigraphy, Carboniferous
    MicropaIeontoIogicaI Zonation (Foramin ifers, Algae) and Stratigraphy, Carboniferous Peratrovich Formation, Southeastern Alaska By BERNARD L. MAMET, SYLVIE PINARD, and AUGUSTUS K. ARMSTRONG U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 2031 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Robert M. Hirsch, Acting Director Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government Text and illustrations edited by Mary Lou Callas Line drawings prepared by B.L. Mamet and Stephen Scott Layout and design by Lisa Baserga UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1993 For sale by Book and Open-File Report Sales U.S. Geological Survey Federal Center, Box 25286 Denver, CO 80225 Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Mamet, Bernard L. Micropaleontological zonation (foraminifers, algae) and stratigraphy, Carboniferous Peratrovich Formation, southeastern Alaska / by Bernard L. Mamet, Sylvie Pinard, and Augustus K. Armstrong. p. cm.-(U.S. Geological Survey bulletin ; 2031) Includes bibtiographical references. 1. Geology, Stratigraphic-Carboniferous. 2. Geology-Alaska-Prince of Wales Island. 3. Foraminifera, Fossil-Alaska-Prince of Wales Island. 4. Algae, Fossil-Alaska-Prince of Wales Island. 5. Paleontology- Carboniferous. 6. Paleontology-Alaska-Prince of Wales Island. I. Pinard, Sylvie. II. Armstrong, Augustus K. Ill. Title. IV. Series. QE75.B9 no. 2031 [QE671I 557.3 s--dc20 [551.7'5'097982] 92-32905 CIP CONTENTS Abstract
    [Show full text]
  • 88 Reasons to Love Alberta Parks
    88 Reasons to Love Alberta Parks 1. Explore the night sky! Head to Miquelon Lake Provincial Park to get lost among the stars in the Beaver Hills Dark Sky Preserve. 2. Experience Cooking Lake-Blackfoot Provincial Recreation Area in the Beaver Hills UNESCO Biosphere Reserve. This unique 1600 square km reserve has natural habitats that support abundant wildlife, alongside agriculture and industry, on the doorstep of the major urban area of Edmonton. 3. Paddle the Red Deer River through the otherworldly shaped cliffs and badlands of Dry Island Buffalo Jump Provincial Park. 4. Wildlife viewing. Our parks are home to many wildlife species. We encourage you to actively discover, explore and experience nature and wildlife safely and respectfully. 5. Vibrant autumn colours paint our protected landscapes in the fall. Feel the crunch of fallen leaves underfoot and inhale the crisp woodland scented air on trails in many provincial parks and recreation areas. 6. Sunsets illuminating wetlands and lakes throughout our provincial parks system, like this one in Pierre Grey’s Lakes Provincial Park. 7. Meet passionate and dedicated Alberta Parks staff in a visitor center, around the campground, or out on the trails. Their enthusiasm and knowledge of our natural world combines adventure with learning to add value to your parks experiences!. 8. Get out in the crisp winter air in Cypress Hills Provincial Park where you can explore on snowshoe, cross-country ski or skating trails, or for those with a need for speed, try out the luge. 9. Devonshire Beach: the natural white sand beach at Lesser Slave Lake Provincial Park is consistently ranked as one of the top beaches in Canada! 10.
    [Show full text]
  • 20924-D01-2016
    Decision 20924-D01-2016 AltaLink Management Ltd. South and West of Edmonton Area Transmission Development Cooking Lake, Saunders Lake, Wabamun and Leduc Developments July 15, 2016 Alberta Utilities Commission Decision 20924-D01-2016 AltaLink Management Ltd. South and West of Edmonton Area Transmission Development Cooking Lake, Saunders Lake, Wabamun and Leduc Developments Proceeding 20924 Applications 20924-A001 and 20924-A003 to 20924-A016 July 15, 2016 Published by the: Alberta Utilities Commission Fifth Avenue Place, Fourth Floor, 425 First Street S.W. Calgary, Alberta T2P 3L8 Telephone: 403-592-8845 Fax: 403-592-4406 Website: www.auc.ab.ca Contents 1 Decision summary ................................................................................................................. 1 2 Legislative scheme ................................................................................................................. 2 2.1 The process for new transmission development in Alberta ........................................... 2 2.2 Public interest ................................................................................................................. 3 3 Background ........................................................................................................................... 4 3.1 South and West of Edmonton Area Transmission System Reinforcement needs identification document approval ................................................................................... 4 3.2 Interventions ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Structural Geology of the Southern Livingstone Range
    Meteoric fluid isotopic signatures of thrust-fault-related veins in the Livingstone Range anticlinorium and their significance for syn-deformational regional fluid migration Michael A. Cooley*, Raymond A. Price, John M. Dixon, and T. Kurtis Kyser Department of Geological Sciences and Geological Engineering Queen’s University, Kingston, Kingston, ON, K7L 3N6 [email protected] ABSTRACT δ13C and δ18O isotope values of calcite in veins and host rocks from thrust fault zones indicate that fluids with meteoric isotopic signatures were present along thrust faults and infiltrating the tip-lines of minor thrusts during the formation of fault-propagation folds in the Livingstone Range Anticlinorium of southwest Alberta. Isotope geochemistry of cross-fault veins indicates that formation fluids predominated within the transverse structures, implying that cross faults were not conduits for local downward infiltration of meteoric water. Meteoric fluids must have been flowing eastward along the major thrust faults from a recharge area in the topographically higher hinterland to the west during formation of the thrust and fold belt. The incursion of meteoric waters coincided with hydrocarbon migration as indicated by hydrocarbon residues within thrust- fault-related calcite veins. Introduction The Livingstone Range of the southern Alberta foothills comprises the easternmost surface exposures of Carboniferous rocks in the southern Canadian Cordillera (Fig. 1). The Livingstone Range is an anticlinorium that developed where the Livingstone thrust cuts up-section in its hanging wall from a regional detachment in the upper Palliser Formation, through the overlying Mississippian Rundle Group and younger strata to an upper detachment within the Jurassic Fernie Formation. The anticlinorium comprises two to three adjacent fault- propagation fold anticlines which contain thrust faults that die out upwards into the cores of the folds.
    [Show full text]
  • Subsurface Characterization of the Pembina-Wabamun Acid-Gas Injection Area
    ERCB/AGS Special Report 093 Subsurface Characterization of the Pembina-Wabamun Acid-Gas Injection Area Subsurface Characterization of the Pembina-Wabamun Acid-Gas Injection Area Stefan Bachu Maja Buschkuehle Kristine Haug Karsten Michael Alberta Geological Survey Alberta Energy and Utilities Board ©Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Alberta, 2008 ISBN 978-0-7785-6950-3 The Energy Resources Conservation Board/Alberta Geological Survey (ERCB/AGS) and its employees and contractors make no warranty, guarantee or representation, express or implied, or assume any legal liability regarding the correctness, accuracy, completeness or reliability of this publication. Any digital data and software supplied with this publication are subject to the licence conditions. The data are supplied on the understanding that they are for the sole use of the licensee, and will not be redistributed in any form, in whole or in part, to third parties. Any references to proprietary software in the documentation, and/or any use of proprietary data formats in this release, do not constitute endorsement by the ERCB/AGS of any manufacturer's product. If this product is an ERCB/AGS Special Report, the information is provided as received from the author and has not been edited for conformity to ERCB/AGS standards. When using information from this publication in other publications or presentations, due acknowledgment should be given to the ERCB/AGS. The following reference format is recommended: Bachu, S., Buschkuehle, M., Haug, K., Michael, K. (2008): Subsurface characterization of the Pembina-Wabamun acid-gas injection area; Energy Resources Conservation Board, ERCB/AGS Special Report 093, 60 p.
    [Show full text]
  • X X 6 ROCKY 4 Alexo-Saunders X 7MOUNTAIN HOUSE 6 Chambers Creek # 7 Crimson Lake X 10 Eagle Point Priority 5 Priority 3 1 # X Proposed Tourism Node
    North Saskatchewan Region: Regional Advisory Council Recommended Recreation Approaches ! ! ! ! ! ! BASCA ! HA ! LOWER AT ! ! ! Approach 1: Priority Recreation Management Planning ! REGION UPP ! ER PEACE REGION ! ! Priority 1 Upper (East) Planning Area ! ! Priority 2 Long Lake Planning Area B ! ! UPPER ! Priority 3 Lower and Center Planning Area ! ! Priority 4 Upper (Central) Planning Area ! PEA ! CE 13 12 ST. PAUL ! Priority 5 Ram Planning Area ! REDWATER Priority 6 GranUdpper (West) Planning Area ! e ! Cache er # ! iv Proposed Public Land Recreation Area ! R th Sa Nor skatchewan ! Approach 2: Upgrades to Existing Parks Priority 2 ! S ! ! A Priority 1 Pigeon Lake A ! S B Priority 2 Long Lake ! K ! C Priority 3 Calhoun Bay ! EDMONTON A ! T D Priority 4 Crimson Lake UPPER ATHABASCA REGION ! 11 C E Priority 5 Fish Lake ! ! H F Priority 6 Goldeye Lake ! ! 10 R E G Priority 7 Red Deer River LLOYDMINSTE ! W ! LEDUC adius DRAYTON Edmonton 100km R ! A Approach 3: Additions of New Lands VALLEY ! N ! Proposed Recreation Area with Consensus # ! ! 2 Bighorn Dam ! CAMROSE ! Priority 1 ! A 5 Jackfish Lake C ! X 9 ! WAINWRIGHT 8 Red Deer River # ! Priority 6 ! ! 9 Buck Lake ! B! a 11 Cooking Lake-Blackfoot # ! ttle ! # ! Ri ! v 12 Bellis Lake ! er C.F.B WAINWRIGHT ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 13 Long Lake Priority 4 ! # Proposed Recreation Area with No Consensus # 1 Preachers Point 5 D X! 3 Crescent Falls X X 6 ROCKY 4 Alexo-Saunders X 7MOUNTAIN HOUSE 6 Chambers Creek # 7 Crimson Lake X 10 Eagle Point Priority 5 Priority 3 1 # X Proposed Tourism Node # Bighorn Backcountry Priority 3 RED DEER REGION City, Town # First Nations Reserve !X Métis Settlement # NORDEGG B BANFF F X 4 X Military Reserve R I NATIONAL Provincial Park or Protected Area T 8 E I G National Park S PARK H 3 Green Area C X White Area O L Hydrography U 2 Provincial Highway M B Kilometers I A 0 25 50 100 # Published: December 15, 2014 Information as depicted is subject to change, therefore the Government SOUTH SASKATCHEWAN REGION of Alberta assumes no responsibility for discrepancies at time of use.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Characteristics
    Antler Lake State of the Watershed Report 4.0 Lake Characteristics 4.1 General Description Antler Lake is a small, shallow, and highly productive lake, located 35 km east of the City of Edmonton in the Beaverhill sub‐watershed. It is comprised of a shallow, main basin with two islands located in the southern end of the lake: Antler Lake Island and Hazelnut Island. Hazelnut Island is connected by road access to the main shore and has several lakeshore properties (Figure 40). Antler is a polymictic lake, meaning, the lake mixes most days throughout the open water season because it is relatively shallow and exposed. Currently, Antler Lake is classified as hypereutrophic, with very high biological productivity (Table 5; AEP, 2018b). Lake Area Characteristics Antler Lake Watershed LEGEND Bathymetric Contours Watershed Boundary Streams Antler Lake Collector Road Waterbodies Highway Antler Lake Hamlet Main Road Public Land 1 1 2 Railway Land Ownership R TWSHP 524 R 8 4.4 73 732.95 0 1 2 R ± R H ig hw ay 6 This map was created by the North Saskatchewan 30 Watershed Alliance on July 31st, 2018 with data from Strathcona County and the Government of Alberta. km 01230.5 Figure 40. Bathymetry and Lake Area Characteristics of the Antler Lake Watershed (data from Strathcona County GIS Services, 2018; AltaLis, 2016) 62 Antler Lake State of the Watershed Report Table 5. General Lake Characteristics for Antler Lake (AEP, 2018b; Figliuzzi, 2018). General Lake Characteristics Antler Lake Physical Lake Surface Area (km2) (at mean elevation of 2.38 Characteristics 738.278 m) Watershed‐to‐Lake Ratio 8.87:1 Max Depth (m) 4.69 Mean Depth (m) 1.76 Shoreline Length (km) 10.9 Dam, Weir No Recreational Campground No Characteristics Boat Launch No Sport Fish None Water Quality Trophic Status Hypereutrophic Characteristics Total Phosphorus (µg/L) 380 (Averages based on Chlorophyll‐α (µg/L) 121 available data).
    [Show full text]
  • Cadomin and Jasper Areas Willem Langenberg and John Waldron
    Field Guide to Selected Geological Sections of the Cadomin and Jasper Areas Willem Langenberg and John Waldron Edmonton Geological Society Field Trip Guide September 22-23, 2007 Introduction The Rocky Mountains can be divided into Foothills, Front Ranges, and Main Ranges as shown in the cartoon below (Fig. 1). Outcrops in the foothills are dominated by softer weathering Mesozoic rocks of the foreland basin: mainly sandstone and shale but also including conglomerates and coal. Most of the clastic rocks represent material eroded from earlier-formed parts of the orogen to the west, which was subsequently cannibalized as the thrustbelt advanced westward in late Mesozoic to early Cenozoic time. Locally in the foothills, the more resistant late Paleozoic carbonate rocks come to the surface in elongated ridges. Saturday's traverse will begin in the foothills of the Cadomin area and proceed southwest into the Front Ranges. In the Front Ranges carbonates dominate the landscape. These represent the late Paleozoic continental margin of the Laurentian continent, now sliced into multiple imbricated thrust sheets. Mesozoic clastics are confined to narrow valleys. On Sunday morning we will take the Yellowhead Highway further into the Front Ranges and eventually into the Main Ranges of the Rockies. In the Main Ranges, lower parts of the stratigraphy are preserved, including widespread outcrops of older, Early Paleozoic carbonates, clastics, and the underlying Proterozoic succession of the Windermere Supergroup. The structural style is different, too. Although thrust sheets are present, they are generally much larger in scale, and their dips are gentler. In addition, the rocks were more ductile when deformed, so that cleavage and folds are much more widely developed in the mudrocks.
    [Show full text]