DOCSLIB.ORG

20924-D01-2016

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
20924-D01-2016 Decision 20924-D01-2016 AltaLink Management Ltd. South and West of Edmonton Area Transmission Development Cooking Lake, Saunders Lake, Wabamun and Leduc Developments July 15, 2016 Alberta Utilities Commission Decision 20924-D01-2016 AltaLink Management Ltd. South and West of Edmonton Area Transmission Development Cooking Lake, Saunders Lake, Wabamun and Leduc Developments Proceeding 20924 Applications 20924-A001 and 20924-A003 to 20924-A016 July 15, 2016 Published by the: Alberta Utilities Commission Fifth Avenue Place, Fourth Floor, 425 First Street S.W. Calgary, Alberta T2P 3L8 Telephone: 403-592-8845 Fax: 403-592-4406 Website: www.auc.ab.ca Contents 1 Decision summary ................................................................................................................. 1 2 Legislative scheme ................................................................................................................. 2 2.1 The process for new transmission development in Alberta ........................................... 2 2.2 Public interest ................................................................................................................. 3 3 Background ........................................................................................................................... 4 3.1 South and West of Edmonton Area Transmission System Reinforcement needs identification document approval ................................................................................... 4 3.2 Interventions ................................................................................................................... 4 3.3 Hearing ........................................................................................................................... 4 3.4 Participants in the proceeding ........................................................................................ 5 4 Wabamun, Leduc and telecommunications developments ............................................... 6 4.1 Wabamun development .................................................................................................. 6 4.2 Leduc development ........................................................................................................ 6 4.3 Telecommunications development................................................................................. 7 4.4 Commission findings ..................................................................................................... 7 5 Saunders Lake development ................................................................................................ 7 5.1 Views of the interveners............................................................................................... 11 5.2 Commission findings ................................................................................................... 11 6 Cooking Lake development ................................................................................................ 12 6.1 Project description ........................................................................................................ 12 6.2 Consultation ................................................................................................................. 13 6.2.1 Commission findings ...................................................................................... 14 6.3 Route development....................................................................................................... 15 6.3.1 Views of AltaLink........................................................................................... 15 6.3.2 Views of the interveners ................................................................................. 17 6.3.3 Commission findings ...................................................................................... 18 6.4 Right-of-way, construction workspace and access trails ............................................. 19 6.4.1 Views of AltaLink........................................................................................... 19 6.4.2 Views of the interveners ................................................................................. 21 6.4.3 Commission findings ...................................................................................... 21 6.5 Property impacts........................................................................................................... 21 6.5.1 Proximity to residences ................................................................................... 21 6.5.1.1 Views of AltaLink ............................................................................. 21 6.5.1.2 Views of the interveners .................................................................... 23 6.5.1.3 Commission findings ......................................................................... 24 6.5.2 Property value ................................................................................................. 25 6.5.2.1 Commission findings ......................................................................... 31 6.5.3 Visual impacts and tree clearing ..................................................................... 34 6.5.3.1 Views of AltaLink ............................................................................. 34 6.5.3.2 Views of the interveners .................................................................... 36 6.5.3.3 Commission findings ......................................................................... 39 6.5.4 Existing disturbances, future development and road widening ...................... 40 6.5.4.1 Views of AltaLink ............................................................................. 40 Decision 20924-D01-2016 (July 15, 2016) • i 6.5.4.2 Views of the interveners .................................................................... 42 6.5.4.3 Commission findings ......................................................................... 45 6.6 Environmental impacts................................................................................................. 46 6.6.1 Views of AltaLink........................................................................................... 46 6.6.2 Views of the interveners ................................................................................. 49 6.6.3 Commission findings ...................................................................................... 52 6.7 Cost .............................................................................................................................. 55 6.7.1 Views of AltaLink........................................................................................... 55 6.7.2 Views of the interveners ................................................................................. 55 6.7.3 Commission findings ...................................................................................... 56 6.8 Cooking Lake Cemetery .............................................................................................. 56 6.8.1 Views of AltaLink........................................................................................... 56 6.8.2 Views of the interveners ................................................................................. 57 6.8.3 Commission findings ...................................................................................... 58 6.9 Electric and magnetic fields (EMF) ............................................................................. 59 6.9.1 Commission findings ...................................................................................... 60 6.10 Noise ............................................................................................................................ 60 6.10.1 Commission findings .................................................................................... 61 6.11 Safety............................................................................................................................ 62 6.11.1 Views of AltaLink ......................................................................................... 62 6.11.2 Views of interveners...................................................................................... 62 6.11.3 Commission findings .................................................................................... 63 6.12 Approved route............................................................................................................. 64 6.13 Proposed route variations ............................................................................................. 65 6.13.1 Commission findings .................................................................................... 66 7 Findings ................................................................................................................................ 67 8 Decision ................................................................................................................................ 67 Appendix A – Proceeding participants ..................................................................................... 69 Appendix B – Oral hearing – registered appearances ............................................................. 72 Appendix C – Cooking Lake Alternate Route Resistors (CLARR) group members ........... 74 List of figures Figure 1 - Saunders Lake 289S Substation Proposed Locations (not to scale) .............................. 8 Figure 2 - Proposed Cooking Lake Transmission Line Routes
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Municipal Guide
    Municipal Guide Planning for a Healthy and Sustainable North Saskatchewan River Watershed Cover photos: Billie Hilholland From top to bottom: Abraham Lake An agricultural field alongside Highway 598 North Saskatchewan River flowing through the City of Edmonton Book design and layout by Gwen Edge Municipal Guide: Planning for a Healthy and Sustainable North Saskatchewan River Watershed prepared for the North Saskatchewan Watershed Alliance by Giselle Beaudry Acknowledgements The North Saskatchewan Watershed Alliance would like to thank the following for their generous contributions to this Municipal Guide through grants and inkind support. ii Municipal Guide: Planning for a Healthy and Sustainable North Saskatchewan Watershed Acknowledgements The North Saskatchewan Watershed Alliance would like to thank the following individuals who dedicated many hours to the Municipal Guide project. Their voluntary contributions in the development of this guide are greatly appreciated. Municipal Guide Steering Committee Andrew Schoepf, Alberta Environment Bill Symonds, Alberta Municipal Affairs David Curran, Alberta Environment Delaney Anderson, St. Paul & Smoky Lake Counties Doug Thrussell, Alberta Environment Gabrielle Kosmider, Fisheries and Oceans Canada George Turk, Councillor, Lac Ste. Anne County Graham Beck, Leduc County and City of Edmonton Irvin Frank, Councillor, Camrose County Jolee Gillies,Town of Devon Kim Nielsen, Clearwater County Lorraine Sawdon, Fisheries and Oceans Canada Lyndsay Waddingham, Alberta Municipal Affairs Murray Klutz, Ducks
    [Show full text]
  • Antler Lake State of the Watershed Report
    Antler Lake State of the Watershed Report October 2019 i Antler Lake State of the Watershed Report North Saskatchewan Watershed Alliance 202 –9440 49th Street NW Edmonton, AB T6B 2M9 (587) 525‐6820 Email: [email protected] http://www.nswa.ab.ca The NSWA gratefully acknowledges operational funding support received from the Government of Alberta and many municipal partners. The North Saskatchewan Watershed Alliance (NSWA) is a non‐profit society whose purpose is to protect and improve water quality and ecosystem functioning in the North Saskatchewan River watershed in Alberta. The organization is guided by a Board of Directors composed of member organizations from within the watershed. It is the designated Watershed Planning and Advisory Council (WPAC) for the North Saskatchewan River under the Government of Alberta’s Water for Life Strategy. This report was prepared by Michelle Gordy, Ph.D., David Trew, B.Sc., Denika Piggott B.Sc., Breda Muldoon, M.Sc., and J. Leah Kongsrude, M.Sc. of the North Saskatchewan Watershed Alliance. Cover photo credit: Kate Caldwell Suggested Citation: North Saskatchewan Watershed Alliance (NSWA), 2019. Antler Lake State of the Watershed Report. Prepared for the Antler Lake Stewardship Committee (ALSC) Antler Lake State of the Watershed Report Executive Summary The Antler Lake Stewardship Committee (ALSC) formed in 2015 to address issues related to lake health. Residents at the lake expressed concerns about deteriorating water quality, blue‐green algal (cyanobacteria1) blooms, proliferation of aquatic vegetation, and low lake levels. In 2016, the Antler Lake Stewardship Committee approached the North Saskatchewan Watershed Alliance (NSWA) to prepare a State of the Watershed report.
    [Show full text]
  • An Investigation of the Interrelationships Among
    AN INVESTIGATION OF THE INTERRELATIONSHIPS AMONG STREAMFLOW, LAKE LEVELS, CLIMATE AND LAND USE, WITH PARTICULAR REFERENCE TO THE BATTLE RIVER BASIN, ALBERTA A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements For the Degree of Master of Science in the Department of Civil Engineering by Ross Herrington Saskatoon, Saskatchewan c 1980. R. Herrington ii The author has agreed that the Library, University of Ssskatchewan, may make this thesis freely available for inspection. Moreover, the author has agreed that permission be granted by the professor or professors who supervised the thesis work recorded herein or, in their absence, by the Head of the Department or the Dean of the College in which the thesis work was done. It is understood that due recognition will be given to the author of this thesis and to the University of Saskatchewan in any use of the material in this thesiso Copying or publication or any other use of the thesis for financial gain without approval by the University of Saskatchewan and the author's written permission is prohibited. Requests for permission to copy or to make any other use of material in this thesis in whole or in part should be addressed to: Head of the Department of Civil Engineering Uni ve:rsi ty of Saskatchewan SASKATOON, Canada. iii ABSTRACT Streamflow records exist for the Battle River near Ponoka, Alberta from 1913 to 1931 and from 1966 to the present. Analysis of these two periods has indicated that streamflow in the month of April has remained constant while mean flows in the other months have significantly decreased in the more recent period.
    [Show full text]
  • 88 Reasons to Love Alberta Parks
    88 Reasons to Love Alberta Parks 1. Explore the night sky! Head to Miquelon Lake Provincial Park to get lost among the stars in the Beaver Hills Dark Sky Preserve. 2. Experience Cooking Lake-Blackfoot Provincial Recreation Area in the Beaver Hills UNESCO Biosphere Reserve. This unique 1600 square km reserve has natural habitats that support abundant wildlife, alongside agriculture and industry, on the doorstep of the major urban area of Edmonton. 3. Paddle the Red Deer River through the otherworldly shaped cliffs and badlands of Dry Island Buffalo Jump Provincial Park. 4. Wildlife viewing. Our parks are home to many wildlife species. We encourage you to actively discover, explore and experience nature and wildlife safely and respectfully. 5. Vibrant autumn colours paint our protected landscapes in the fall. Feel the crunch of fallen leaves underfoot and inhale the crisp woodland scented air on trails in many provincial parks and recreation areas. 6. Sunsets illuminating wetlands and lakes throughout our provincial parks system, like this one in Pierre Grey’s Lakes Provincial Park. 7. Meet passionate and dedicated Alberta Parks staff in a visitor center, around the campground, or out on the trails. Their enthusiasm and knowledge of our natural world combines adventure with learning to add value to your parks experiences!. 8. Get out in the crisp winter air in Cypress Hills Provincial Park where you can explore on snowshoe, cross-country ski or skating trails, or for those with a need for speed, try out the luge. 9. Devonshire Beach: the natural white sand beach at Lesser Slave Lake Provincial Park is consistently ranked as one of the top beaches in Canada! 10.
    [Show full text]
  • X X 6 ROCKY 4 Alexo-Saunders X 7MOUNTAIN HOUSE 6 Chambers Creek # 7 Crimson Lake X 10 Eagle Point Priority 5 Priority 3 1 # X Proposed Tourism Node
    North Saskatchewan Region: Regional Advisory Council Recommended Recreation Approaches ! ! ! ! ! ! BASCA ! HA ! LOWER AT ! ! ! Approach 1: Priority Recreation Management Planning ! REGION UPP ! ER PEACE REGION ! ! Priority 1 Upper (East) Planning Area ! ! Priority 2 Long Lake Planning Area B ! ! UPPER ! Priority 3 Lower and Center Planning Area ! ! Priority 4 Upper (Central) Planning Area ! PEA ! CE 13 12 ST. PAUL ! Priority 5 Ram Planning Area ! REDWATER Priority 6 GranUdpper (West) Planning Area ! e ! Cache er # ! iv Proposed Public Land Recreation Area ! R th Sa Nor skatchewan ! Approach 2: Upgrades to Existing Parks Priority 2 ! S ! ! A Priority 1 Pigeon Lake A ! S B Priority 2 Long Lake ! K ! C Priority 3 Calhoun Bay ! EDMONTON A ! T D Priority 4 Crimson Lake UPPER ATHABASCA REGION ! 11 C E Priority 5 Fish Lake ! ! H F Priority 6 Goldeye Lake ! ! 10 R E G Priority 7 Red Deer River LLOYDMINSTE ! W ! LEDUC adius DRAYTON Edmonton 100km R ! A Approach 3: Additions of New Lands VALLEY ! N ! Proposed Recreation Area with Consensus # ! ! 2 Bighorn Dam ! CAMROSE ! Priority 1 ! A 5 Jackfish Lake C ! X 9 ! WAINWRIGHT 8 Red Deer River # ! Priority 6 ! ! 9 Buck Lake ! B! a 11 Cooking Lake-Blackfoot # ! ttle ! # ! Ri ! v 12 Bellis Lake ! er C.F.B WAINWRIGHT ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 13 Long Lake Priority 4 ! # Proposed Recreation Area with No Consensus # 1 Preachers Point 5 D X! 3 Crescent Falls X X 6 ROCKY 4 Alexo-Saunders X 7MOUNTAIN HOUSE 6 Chambers Creek # 7 Crimson Lake X 10 Eagle Point Priority 5 Priority 3 1 # X Proposed Tourism Node # Bighorn Backcountry Priority 3 RED DEER REGION City, Town # First Nations Reserve !X Métis Settlement # NORDEGG B BANFF F X 4 X Military Reserve R I NATIONAL Provincial Park or Protected Area T 8 E I G National Park S PARK H 3 Green Area C X White Area O L Hydrography U 2 Provincial Highway M B Kilometers I A 0 25 50 100 # Published: December 15, 2014 Information as depicted is subject to change, therefore the Government SOUTH SASKATCHEWAN REGION of Alberta assumes no responsibility for discrepancies at time of use.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Characteristics
    Antler Lake State of the Watershed Report 4.0 Lake Characteristics 4.1 General Description Antler Lake is a small, shallow, and highly productive lake, located 35 km east of the City of Edmonton in the Beaverhill sub‐watershed. It is comprised of a shallow, main basin with two islands located in the southern end of the lake: Antler Lake Island and Hazelnut Island. Hazelnut Island is connected by road access to the main shore and has several lakeshore properties (Figure 40). Antler is a polymictic lake, meaning, the lake mixes most days throughout the open water season because it is relatively shallow and exposed. Currently, Antler Lake is classified as hypereutrophic, with very high biological productivity (Table 5; AEP, 2018b). Lake Area Characteristics Antler Lake Watershed LEGEND Bathymetric Contours Watershed Boundary Streams Antler Lake Collector Road Waterbodies Highway Antler Lake Hamlet Main Road Public Land 1 1 2 Railway Land Ownership R TWSHP 524 R 8 4.4 73 732.95 0 1 2 R ± R H ig hw ay 6 This map was created by the North Saskatchewan 30 Watershed Alliance on July 31st, 2018 with data from Strathcona County and the Government of Alberta. km 01230.5 Figure 40. Bathymetry and Lake Area Characteristics of the Antler Lake Watershed (data from Strathcona County GIS Services, 2018; AltaLis, 2016) 62 Antler Lake State of the Watershed Report Table 5. General Lake Characteristics for Antler Lake (AEP, 2018b; Figliuzzi, 2018). General Lake Characteristics Antler Lake Physical Lake Surface Area (km2) (at mean elevation of 2.38 Characteristics 738.278 m) Watershed‐to‐Lake Ratio 8.87:1 Max Depth (m) 4.69 Mean Depth (m) 1.76 Shoreline Length (km) 10.9 Dam, Weir No Recreational Campground No Characteristics Boat Launch No Sport Fish None Water Quality Trophic Status Hypereutrophic Characteristics Total Phosphorus (µg/L) 380 (Averages based on Chlorophyll‐α (µg/L) 121 available data).
    [Show full text]
  • Langdon Lake
    LANGDON LAKE MCWD H/H and Pollutant Loading Study – 2003 C-1 Emmons and Olivier Resources, Inc. Volume IV: Watershed Modeling and Discussion Langdon Lake Table of Contents C. Langdon Lake............................................................................................................................ 3 C.1. General Description............................................................................................................ 3 C.2. Physical Features................................................................................................................ 6 C.2.a. Land Cover/Land Use.................................................................................................. 6 C.2.b. Geology ..................................................................................................................... 10 C.2.c. Soils ........................................................................................................................... 11 C.2.d. Groundwater.............................................................................................................. 11 C.3. Water Quantity ................................................................................................................. 16 C.3.a. Watershed Hydrology................................................................................................. 16 C.3.b. Watershed Hydraulics ................................................................................................ 19 C.3.c. Water Quantity Findings and Discussion..................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Park, Trail and Open Space Plan
    ____________________________________________________ CITY OF MINNETRISTA THE PARK, TRAIL AND OPEN SPACE PLAN ADOPTED MARCH 2004 Revised March 2005 Revised January 2010 CONTENTS PAGE 1: INTRODUCTION ______________________________________________2 Credits Plan Intent and Use Planning Process 2: INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS __________________________________6 Existing Park Service Analysis Existing Natural Resources 3: THE PARK, TRAIL AND OPEN SPACE PLAN ____________________12 The Vision and Guiding Principles Park and Trail Plan Other Recreation Opportunities Open Space and Greenway Opportunities Plan 4: IMPLEMENTATION __________________________________________34 Overview Comprehensive Plan Park Dedication Ordinance Other Land Acquisition Strategies Park Development Continued Planning Capital Improvement Plan APPENDIX A: Minnetrista Park Dedication Ordinance (revised) B: Area Recreational Organizations and Opportunities C: Individual Existing Park Aerials and Inventory D: Park Development Costs E: Park Maintenance Table F: Park, Trail and Open Space Public Input Summaries G: Resource List H: CAC Recommendation Summary I: Fig. 1 – Park Matrix of Existing Facilities J: Fig. 2 – Park Service Analysis Map K: Fig 3 – Natural Resources Inventory Map L: Fig 4 – Park, Trail and Open Space Plan M: Fig 5 – Greenway Opportunities Plan Map N: Fig 6 – City Owned Trail Easements & Trails MINNETRISTA PARK, TRAIL AND OPEN SPACE PLAN CONTENTS PAGE 1 CREDITS_______________________________________ This planning process was undertaken with the guidance and review
    [Show full text]
  • Trophic State of Alberta Lakes Based on Average Total Phosphorus
    Created Feb 2013 TROPHIC STATE OF ALBERTA LAKES Based On Average (May-October) Total Phosphorus Concentrations Total Phosphorus (µg/L) 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 * Adamson Lake Alix Lake * Amisk Lake * Angling Lake Oligotrophic * ‡ Antler Lake Arm Lake (Low Productivity) * Astotin Lake (<10 µg/L) * ‡ Athabasca (Lake) - Off Delta Baptiste Lake - North Basin Baptiste Lake - South Basin * ‡ Bare Creek Res. Mesotrophic * ‡ Barrier Lake ‡ Battle Lake (Moderate Productivity) * † Battle River Res. (Forestburg) (10 - 35 µg/L) Beartrap Lake Beauvais Lake Beaver Lake * Bellevue Lake Eutrophic * † Big Lake - East Basin * † Big Lake - West Basin (High Productivity) * Blackfalds Lake (35 - 100 µg/L) * † Blackmud Lake * ‡ Blood Indian Res. Bluet (South Garnier Lake) ‡ Bonnie Lake Hypereutrophic † Borden Lake * ‡ Bourque Lake (Very High Productivity) ‡ Buck Lake (>100 µg/L) Buffalo Lake - Main Basin Buffalo Lake - Secondary Bay * † Buffalo Lake (By Boyle) † Burntstick Lake Calling Lake * † Capt Eyre Lake † Cardinal Lake * ‡ Carolside Res. - Berry Creek Res. † Chain Lakes Res. - North Basin † Chain Lakes Res.- South Basin Chestermere Lake * † Chickakoo Lake * † Chickenhill Lake * Chin Coulee Res. * Clairmont Lake Clear (Barns) Lake Clear Lake ‡ Coal Lake * ‡ Cold Lake - English Bay ‡ Cold Lake - West Side ‡ Cooking Lake † Cow Lake * Crawling Valley Res. Crimson Lake Crowsnest Lake * † Cutbank Lake Dillberry Lake * Driedmeat Lake ‡ Eagle Lake ‡ Elbow Lake Elkwater Lake Ethel Lake * Fawcett Lake * † Fickle Lake * † Figure Eight Lake * Fishing Lake * Flyingshot Lake * Fork Lake * ‡ Fox Lake Res. Frog Lake † Garner Lake Garnier Lake (North) * George Lake * † Ghost Res. - Inside Bay * † Ghost Res. - Inside Breakwater ‡ Ghost Res. - Near Cochrane * Gleniffer Lake (Dickson Res.) * † Glenmore Res.
    [Show full text]
  • South and West of Edmonton Newsletter
    UPDATE October 2012 South and West of Edmonton Transmission System Development Project Update The Alberta Electric System Operator (AESO) has updated information on the South and West Edmonton project. In 2011, the AESO identified the need to The potential transmission system OPEN HOUSES reinforce the transmission system south developments now include: The AESO held a series of open houses and west of Edmonton to meet the growing n a new 240/138 kV substation just in Fall 2011 and 2012 to discuss the need demand for electricity from residential, north of Leduc for transmission development in the area commercial and industrial growth n a new 240/138 kV substation either south and west of Edmonton and to in the area. north or south of Stony Plain discuss refinements to these potential Recently, we completed further analysis n new 138 kV and 240 kV transmission developments. We have included the that refined the potential transmission lines around Stony Plain and Spruce poster boards displayed at the open system developments required. Grove, and south and east of Edmonton houses. These boards contain information on the AESO, our consultation process, n potential modifications to the and the project. We still welcome feedback Electricity demand in Alberta Acheson 305S, Cooking Lake 522S, as we proceed with the regulatory process. has increased 36% since 2000 Stony Plain 434S, Spruce Grove 595S, and is expected to grow 2.4% Blackmud 155S, Ellerslie 89S, Leduc per year until 2032. 325S and Nisku 149S substations. We want to hear from you Approximate areas where potential transmission system developments may occur.
    [Show full text]
  • British Columbia
    118°30'0"W 118°0'0"W 117°30'0"W 117°0'0"W 116°30'0"W 116°0'0"W 115°30'0"W 115°0'0"W 114°30'0"W 114°0'0"W 113°30'0"W 113°0'0"W 112°30'0"W Blefgen Island Grassland Island Lake Atmore Village / Hamlet Gray Lake Lake 10 km Study Corridor R21R20 W5M R19 R18 R17 R16R15 R14 R13 R12 R11 R10 R9R8 R7 R6 R5 R4 R3 R2 R1 W5M Lake R26 W4M R25 R24 R23 R22 R21 R20 R19 R18 R17 R16 W4M T67 Kilometre Post (KP) Island Lake South Oakley Dakin Lake Brereton September Lake 30 km Study Corridor Lake Baptiste LAC LA Lake 54°45'0"N Existing Trans Mountain Pipeline 44 Lake Grassy PROPOSED TRANS BICHE ATHABASCA LANDING Trans Mountain Expansion Whispering Hills COUNTY T66 Lake MOUNTAIN T67 West Baptiste SETTLEMENT 100 km Study Corridor 55 Selected Study Corridor (V4) Sunset Beach 63 EXPANSION PROJECT Roche MUNICIPAL DISTRICT Burnt North Hylo Trans Mountain Expansion Lake OF LESSER SLAVE Lake Alternate Corridor (V4) City / Town Francis South Baptiste ATHABASCA Buck Lake ATHABASCA 54°45'0"N Windfall RIVER NO. 124 Lake ALBERTA SWAN COUNTY Terminal Lake Cross Lake HILLS Flatbush Bleak Trapeze Indian Reserve / Métis Settlement Provincial Park Flat T65 T66 Lake Pump Station (Pump Addition or Relocation, Lake Lake APRIL 2013 DRAFT Freeman Skeleton Caslan Valves and/or Scraper Facilities) Io Canoe Lake se Lake National Park gu Meekwap Lake Mewatha Beach n Duck Narrow Colinton Bondiss R Lake New Pump Station (Proposed) iv WOODLANDS Sara Lake Lake Boyle er Foley Amisk Buffalo Lake COUNTY Lake Metis Settlement Provincial Park Lake Lake T65 T64 Pump Station (Reactivation) MUNICIPAL
    [Show full text]
  • MINNETRISTA 20 S M H 26 L
    d r 7 T nd 5 a R sl d Rice I d 1 er G b R d Tim R D n n R H 157 w y o a e A l $ t e n + r l i e l S e t r L Lake a p u C 110 D Fox Ridge Cir o c W e $ c + 4 z C c t u MUNICIPALITY OF M 0 n 84 L u 6 0 1 +$ FRANKLIN d INDEPENDENCE IR K 1 CSAH 19 C R +$ 1 i n r w H F o o f rt A a o e d i t t S r d w s a R C i a l r W R i n y C n a 20 r o R id irway w g D a T $ s e F r + e o t r R r d e e id i t g g 19 s Ba a n e y I s +$ y id W C e a R 92 t d +$ B T 2 9 -2 3 5 H "26 A Sõ d O S x C Y R C CR o -2 ke 6 S C A i m r r H a r F 1 D 1 e 0 MINNETRISTA 20 s M H 26 l m SA " 6 l ea C Sõ -2 i d 20 a R o 7 H H C n w A G L S 0 g C v Ox n Hillsdale Dr i 1 i e l C m l B url Oa r w ks Ct Bu r o S l Yoke A O D A R a h 135 r H k t 127 Lake r " s +$ Sõ o 1 D 1 r N Hainlin Dr Sunset Dr 0 North Arm Dr North Arm Dr lawn ood R D d 2 'c W 110 h 1 110 PREPARED BY THE CR- en 2 e 1 6 C 26 ir " d 1 Sõ e v R n Trails End Cir e A d O CSA Peterson Pond L H v n 92 a n St And t r k n L e e e A MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION e w S e n E tr s t k n e Rd l S d r ti ter i S 0 h in t n s C a a i 2 r i H P a r P a A r D t r e S d L C L K a s e P D a T k t R u e r e v g i k r e u E n lm S 8 w t e o CR-26 A P L OFFICE OF TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM MANAGEMENT M C i 0 n n h a d n r r e 7 C 26 R- S S k t 1 P a w o 2 a N 26 n " i A n h a 1 o Sõ G k t t - e H e y r r a rs t th e r v H R o l C 1 A i ir u A g p C o N r 1 L h m l p C a a 0 e n Millman Lake N d c D A k s t r e L n n s v e i r e W r w u a P l ar B h kw C e r ay IN COOPERATION WITH a Pin n c h e kev v La ie R o 2 w C d y C 1 e l o W Deer Creek Rd 151 i 151 u 1 l Rd a U.S.
    [Show full text]