Activities in Planetary Geology for the Physical and Earth Sciences

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Activities in Planetary Geology for the Physical and Earth Sciences DOCUMENT RESUME ED 239 921 SE 044 107 AUTHOR D'Alli, Richard, Ed.; Greely, Ronald, Ed. TITLE Activities in Planetary Geology for the Physicaland Earth Sciences. INSTITUTION National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, D.C. REPORT NO NASA-EP-179 PUB DATE 82 NOTE 184p.; Chart on inside front cover andphotographs may not reproduce well. PUB TYPE Guides Classroom Use - Guides (For Teachers) (052) EDRS -PRICE MF01/PC08 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Astronomy; Cartography; ClassActiv&ties; *Earth Science; *Geology; Learning Activities; *Lunar Research; Meteorology; Postsecondary Education; Resource Materials; *Science Activities;Secondary Education; *Space Exploration; Teaching Guides IDENTIFIERS Mars (Planet); Moon; PP Project; *PlanetaryGeology; Pladets ABSTRACT The activities,, in this guide dealwith concepts in planetary geology, but they can begeneralized to illustrate broad problems in the earth sciences. They aredesigned to supplement or introduce topics usually encountered inearth science courses. The exercises, organized into independentunits which can be presented in any order, areappropriate for secondary and postsecondaryeducation; however, most can be adapted to theelementary level as well. Each activity is printed twice: once in a formsuitable for classroom use with objectives, materials needed, backgroundinformation, procedures, and questions; and again with answersand suggestions for the teacher inserted in theappropriate blanks. The following units and activities are included: (1) lunarphases (understanding phases of the- moon); (2) planetary cratering(impact cratering and comparing cratering processes); (3) Aeolian processes(Martian wind tunnel); (4) planetary atmospheres (Corioliseffect and storm systems); and (5)- geological mapping of other planets(photogeologic mapping of the moon, planets in stereo,landform mapping, and geologic features of :Mars). Appendices provide informationfor ordering National Aercinautics and Space Administration(NASA) motion pictures and publications, sources of space photographs,suggestions for correlating topics of the activities, and aglossary of planetary geology vocabulary. (DC) *********** Reproductions supplied by EDRS are thebest that can be made * from the original document. ** *.***************.************ U.S. DEPARTMENT IDIF EDUCATION NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF EDUCATION EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER IERIC) :VIZ%dutirent has bowl rof-dolocod as ,asssad ham the Daman at odonvaoon mood-Taboo d. : MOIR thansiO6 have Won Made to imp, POOtOdOchoh quality. Paints of view of ootroons stated in this dodo. mane do not nooessafily on:Rsent official ME ;mama.Or paaay, It I INV1a 'ill 11111:1`c 4.111411 I") lilt OA 441 i..ittIllf- )1.111).10 t' ()IA ii'] I )-Il 1 tr. ,A htl /,',' Ill 01 VW 00V I Ot V-, 4 01 0 01 00 rinpi701 tV1 000 10 000 00') 1' 000 ) 0 414 11 0: it- 90 F: 100 (c) , ; 0 50 le) '1 (c) 00100 !7' I 0 0100 0 I It ) A i7 till )-) t A 1)tI A Ii'r WO.] p 01 ((10 p )4 or., ill l 40 I CI ,t ,04 It) ,Lt)oc) Cl" 0 Httl ' 'A'O lc) liii'f' Ill ION ill 4) r),(1,(0)p t,11. P FAL u Li. (4) ) 4.1 1.tii Acti -Kiesin Planetary Geo logy for The Physical. and Earth Sciences NASA National Aeronautics and Space Administration Washington, DC 20548 1982 For sate by the Superintendent or Docurneol$. 1LS_ Cloy Pr oting Ornce,ivmhingion, S.G. 20.1n2 PREFACE This book is the outgrowth of a short coursein Planetary Geology, conducted in the Spring of 1976 for highschool science instructors from Fairfax County, Virginia,organized by Peter H. Schulte and Ronald Greeley, then of theUniversity of Santa Clara, California. William Johnson, Fairfax HighSchool Earth- Science Instructor, and Lee Ann Hennig, Fort HuntHigh School Planetarium Director, were participants in the short courseand agreed to take- a primary role in preparing aprevious edition of this book entitled Curriculum Guide inPlanetary Geology for Earth Science Instruction. Using material fromthe short course, Johnson and Hennig tested some of the exercisesin the classroom. From their experience, conversations with otherparticipants, and use at Arizona State University, the exercises weremodified for incorporation within this edition. Greeleyand Schultz edited and guided the various drafts of the originalcurriculum guide; D'Alli enlarged and edited that guide into the presentversion. We recognize the need for continued classroomtesting of the material included in this book.User comments and sugges- tions for improvements are solicited and welcomed. Richard D'Alli & Ronald Greeley, 1982 Erepartment of Geology Arizona State University Tempe, Arizona 85287 i-Current address: Lunar and Planetary Institute 3303 NASA Road 1 Houston, Texas 77058 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE it INTRODUCTION SPECIAL NOTE. TO THE TEACHER ...... - VI UNIT ONE: THE LUNAR PHASES UNDERSTANDING THE PHASES OF THE MOON ..... .. UNIT TWO: ACTIVITIES IN PLANETARY CRATERING 19 IMPACT CRATERING . ........ - ... ... .... 20 COMPARING CRATERING PROCESSES 40 IMPACT CRATERING 54 UNIT THREE: ACTIVITIES IN AEOLIAN PROCESSES= 63 AEOLIAN PROCESSES: MARTIAN WIND TUNNEL 64 UNIT FOUR: PLANETARY ATMOSPHERES ....... ................ 79 CORIOLIS EFFECT 80 CORIOLIS EFFECT: DEMONSTRATION I 89 93 CORIOLIS EFFECT: DEMONSTRATION II = STORM SYSTEMS 97 UNIT FIVE: THE GEOLOGICAL MAPPING OF OTHER PLANETS = 111 PHOTOGEOLOGIC MAPPING OF THE MOON: THE PROVINCES 112 PHCTOGEOLOGIC MAPPING-OF THE MOON: STRATIGRAPHY 116 THE PLANETS IN STERE0 124 LANDFORM MAPPING! MOON, MERCURY AND-MARS 131 138 GEOLOGIC FEATURES OF-MARS = APPENDIX 166 HOW TO ORDER NASA MOTION PICTURES 167 HOW TO ORDER NASA PUBLICATIONS 168. A NOTE ABOUT PHOTOGRAPHS 169 SUGGESTED CORRELATION OF TOPICS- 170 SELECTED GLOSSARY FOR PLANETARY GEOLOGY 172 iii INTRODUCTION Contemporary earth science courses gen- expanded, perhaps central, role that curricu- erally include a modest introduction to the lum planners should consider giving to plane- solar system. The justificationis reasonable tary science. Those arguments, a few of which enough: the challenge of the earth sciences is are outlined below, have inspired NASA to to understand the natural processes of the conduct short courses in lunar and planetary terrestrialenvironment, andthe sun and science for earth science teachers at the second- planets are part of that total environment. But ary and college level. This book is a revised edi- there are more compelling arguments for an tion of the results of one of those short courses. THE PLANETARY PERSPECTIVE Few, if any, natural phenomena can ever travel by man and machines there were, in be understood in a figurative vacuum, isolated fact,onlyterrestrialexamples of planet- from theirrelationship with other natural making materials and processes. Now it has phenomena. The planet Earth, even taken as become possible to take that all-important, one, enormous entity,is no exception. The scientificstep of devising general theories natural forces that have driven Earth's evolu- from a collection of working hypotheses. The tion and shaped its surface are most likely multiple working hypotheses come from the operating elsewhere in the solar system. It is scenes of extraterrestrial environments. the job of the earth scientist to recognize those forces on all planets wad explain why A major goal of scienceis prediction. they are manifested on our world in ways that Once primitive, generalized theories are for- seem familiar, and on other worlds in ways mulated, experiments are designed to test the that may not. theories by their predictions. Some experi- ments that could address the problems of The earth scientist is also concerned with earth scientists simply cannot be performed earth materials, the building blocks of this on Earth, in a laboratory or otherwise, because planet. If there has been one illuminating by- of their monumental proportions. What could product of space exploration, it has been the be more illustrative, elegant, or challenging emergence of a unifying vision of the birth than to consider the other planets as great and growth of planets. Pictures of the planets experiments running under conditions differ- sent back by spacecraft strongly suggest the ing from those on Earth? The result may be fraternqy of the inner planets. Rocks and soil not only to wain insight into planetary scale brought back from the Moon bear remarkable problems, but also to escape the somewhat similarity, and of course, important differ- limited and often myopic earthbound view of ences, to earthmaterials. Even spacecraft nature. pictures of the jovian satellites, planets them- selves by right of size, have astounded scien- Along these same lines, there is further tistswiththeirexotic,butrecognizable reason to incorporate _planetology into the surfacematerials.The American geologist study of earth science. The earth scientist is T. C. Chamberlin (1843 - 1928) once wrote painfully aware that the dynamic processes that when approaching a scientific problem, it active on Earth today have virtually wiped was most important to maintain severalnot clean the very record of their own history. just oneworking hypotheses. Prior to space However, relicts and indirect evidence of our iv own deep past exist in various states of pre- Ben Franklin's day. What has been missing is servation on other planetary surfaces. A another model, another atmosphere to study, common tactic used by scientists to under- where the variables are different, but the stand complex systems is to study simpler, dynamics are as definitive. We just may have analogoussystems.Whilethe
Recommended publications
  • Mission to Jupiter
    This book attempts to convey the creativity, Project A History of the Galileo Jupiter: To Mission The Galileo mission to Jupiter explored leadership, and vision that were necessary for the an exciting new frontier, had a major impact mission’s success. It is a book about dedicated people on planetary science, and provided invaluable and their scientific and engineering achievements. lessons for the design of spacecraft. This The Galileo mission faced many significant problems. mission amassed so many scientific firsts and Some of the most brilliant accomplishments and key discoveries that it can truly be called one of “work-arounds” of the Galileo staff occurred the most impressive feats of exploration of the precisely when these challenges arose. Throughout 20th century. In the words of John Casani, the the mission, engineers and scientists found ways to original project manager of the mission, “Galileo keep the spacecraft operational from a distance of was a way of demonstrating . just what U.S. nearly half a billion miles, enabling one of the most technology was capable of doing.” An engineer impressive voyages of scientific discovery. on the Galileo team expressed more personal * * * * * sentiments when she said, “I had never been a Michael Meltzer is an environmental part of something with such great scope . To scientist who has been writing about science know that the whole world was watching and and technology for nearly 30 years. His books hoping with us that this would work. We were and articles have investigated topics that include doing something for all mankind.” designing solar houses, preventing pollution in When Galileo lifted off from Kennedy electroplating shops, catching salmon with sonar and Space Center on 18 October 1989, it began an radar, and developing a sensor for examining Space interplanetary voyage that took it to Venus, to Michael Meltzer Michael Shuttle engines.
    [Show full text]
  • Planetary Geology (Part of Chapter 9): General Processes Affecting the Terrestrial Planets (And the Moon)
    Planetary Geology (part of Chapter 9): General Processes Affecting the Terrestrial Planets (and the Moon) Many geological features on planetary surfaces are shaped by processes within the planet’s interior. The interior of a terrestrial world is divided into three layers of differing densities and chemical compositions: core of high-density metal, mantle of moderate- density rock, and crust of low-density rock. Although we see molten rock (lava) coming out of the Earth, only a thin layer near the top of the mantle is partially molten. However, the solid rock within planets can flow like a liquid over periods of millions of years at speeds of around 1 cm per year. The crust and very top part of the mantle do not deform or flow easily, they are called the lithosphere. The thickness of a planet’s lithosphere affects how easily it can be fractured and rearranged into mountains and valleys, and how easily lava can be erupted onto the surface. Interior heat causes geological activity. Terrestrial worlds were heated during their formation due to accretion and differentiation, and are still heated today by radioactive decay. They are slowly cooling down, with heat moving up through the mantle by convection, up through the crust by conduction, and radiating out to space. Larger planets retain heat for longer than smaller planets, so larger planets are more geologically active. If a rapidly-rotating planet contains a layer of electrically conducting fluid, such as a liquid metal core, then it will have a magnetic field. This magnetic field can protect its atmosphere from the solar wind.
    [Show full text]
  • SPACE RESEARCH in POLAND Report to COMMITTEE
    SPACE RESEARCH IN POLAND Report to COMMITTEE ON SPACE RESEARCH (COSPAR) 2020 Space Research Centre Polish Academy of Sciences and The Committee on Space and Satellite Research PAS Report to COMMITTEE ON SPACE RESEARCH (COSPAR) ISBN 978-83-89439-04-8 First edition © Copyright by Space Research Centre Polish Academy of Sciences and The Committee on Space and Satellite Research PAS Warsaw, 2020 Editor: Iwona Stanisławska, Aneta Popowska Report to COSPAR 2020 1 SATELLITE GEODESY Space Research in Poland 3 1. SATELLITE GEODESY Compiled by Mariusz Figurski, Grzegorz Nykiel, Paweł Wielgosz, and Anna Krypiak-Gregorczyk Introduction This part of the Polish National Report concerns research on Satellite Geodesy performed in Poland from 2018 to 2020. The activity of the Polish institutions in the field of satellite geodesy and navigation are focused on the several main fields: • global and regional GPS and SLR measurements in the frame of International GNSS Service (IGS), International Laser Ranging Service (ILRS), International Earth Rotation and Reference Systems Service (IERS), European Reference Frame Permanent Network (EPN), • Polish geodetic permanent network – ASG-EUPOS, • modeling of ionosphere and troposphere, • practical utilization of satellite methods in local geodetic applications, • geodynamic study, • metrological control of Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) equipment, • use of gravimetric satellite missions, • application of GNSS in overland, maritime and air navigation, • multi-GNSS application in geodetic studies. Report
    [Show full text]
  • Aerospace Dimensions Leader's Guide
    Leader Guide www.capmembers.com/ae Leader Guide for Aerospace Dimensions 2011 Published by National Headquarters Civil Air Patrol Aerospace Education Maxwell AFB, Alabama 3 LEADER GUIDES for AEROSPACE DIMENSIONS INTRODUCTION A Leader Guide has been provided for every lesson in each of the Aerospace Dimensions’ modules. These guides suggest possible ways of presenting the aerospace material and are for the leader’s use. Whether you are a classroom teacher or an Aerospace Education Officer leading the CAP squadron, how you use these guides is up to you. You may know of different and better methods for presenting the Aerospace Dimensions’ lessons, so please don’t hesitate to teach the lesson in a manner that works best for you. However, please consider covering the lesson outcomes since they represent important knowledge we would like the students and cadets to possess after they have finished the lesson. Aerospace Dimensions encourages hands-on participation, and we have included several hands-on activities with each of the modules. We hope you will consider allowing your students or cadets to participate in some of these educational activities. These activities will reinforce your lessons and help you accomplish your lesson out- comes. Additionally, the activities are fun and will encourage teamwork and participation among the students and cadets. Many of the hands-on activities are inexpensive to use and the materials are easy to acquire. The length of time needed to perform the activities varies from 15 minutes to 60 minutes or more. Depending on how much time you have for an activity, you should be able to find an activity that fits your schedule.
    [Show full text]
  • ROSS T. SHINYAMA #8830-0 SUMMER II. Kaiawtr I+9599-O First L-Lawaiian Center 999 Bishop Street, 23Rd Floor
    WATANABI] ING I-LP A Limited Liability [,aw Parrnership ":r : , 1 I ' I J. DOUGLAS ING #1538-0 i.,,i l i t I i '.tì ROSS T. SHINYAMA #8830-0 SUMMER II. KAIAWtr I+9599-O First l-lawaiian Center 999 Bishop Street, 23rd Floor Honolulu, Ilawaii 968 1 3 Telephone No.: (808) 544-8300 Facsimile No.: (808) 544-8399 E-mails : [email protected] Attorneys for TMT INTBRNATIONAL OBSBRVATORY, I,LC BOARD OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES FOR THE STATE OF I]AWAI'I IN THE MATTER OF Case No. BLNR-CC -16-002 TMT INTERNATIONAL A Contested Case l{earing Re Conservation OBSBRVATORY, LLC'S PRE-HEARING District Use Permit (CDUP) I{A-3568 for the STATEMENT; EXHIBIT ..1,'; Thirty Meter Telescope at the Mauna Kea CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Science Reserve, I(a'ohe Mauka, Hãmakua District, Island of Hawai'i, TMK (3) 4-4- 0l 5:009 TABLtr OF CONTBNTS IN'IRODUC]'ION II DI]SCRIPI'ION OF THE PROJECT AND ITS PROCI]DURAL HISTORY A. Description ofthe Project.................. 3 B. Procedulal Llistory 3 l. General Lease and the MI(SR 3 2. T'he Project 5 III. BURDEN OF PROOF I IV. ISSUES TO BE DECIDED AND TIO'S STATEMENT OF POSI'|iON.. A. The Project, Including the Plans Incorporatcd in the Application, is Consistent with Chapter 183C of the Hawai'i Revised Statutes, the Criteria in HAR $ 13-5- 30(c), and Other Applicable Conservation District Rules......... ..........9 i. The Project is consistent with the purpose of the Conservation District.. 10 2. The Project is consistent with the objectives of the sub2one...................
    [Show full text]
  • Mawrth Vallis, Mars: a Fascinating Place for Future in Situ Exploration
    Mawrth Vallis, Mars: a fascinating place for future in situ exploration François Poulet1, Christoph Gross2, Briony Horgan3, Damien Loizeau1, Janice L. Bishop4, John Carter1, Csilla Orgel2 1Institut d’Astrophysique Spatiale, CNRS/Université Paris-Sud, 91405 Orsay Cedex, France 2Institute of Geological Sciences, Planetary Sciences and Remote Sensing Group, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany 3Purdue University, West Lafayette, USA. 4SETI Institute/NASA-ARC, Mountain View, CA, USA Corresponding author: François Poulet, IAS, Bâtiment 121, CNRS/Université Paris-Sud, 91405 Orsay Cedex, France; email: [email protected] Running title: Mawrth: a fascinating place for exploration 1 Abstract After the successful landing of the Mars Science Laboratory rover, both NASA and ESA initiated a selection process for potential landing sites for the Mars2020 and ExoMars missions, respectively. Two ellipses located in the Mawrth Vallis region were proposed and evaluated during a series of meetings (3 for Mars2020 mission and 5 for ExoMars). We describe here the regional context of the two proposed ellipses as well as the framework of the objectives of these two missions. Key science targets of the ellipses and their astrobiological interests are reported. This work confirms the proposed ellipses contain multiple past Martian wet environments of subaerial, subsurface and/or subaqueous character, in which to probe the past climate of Mars, build a broad picture of possible past habitable environments, evaluate their exobiological potentials and search for biosignatures in well-preserved rocks. A mission scenario covering several key investigations during the nominal mission of each rover is also presented, as well as descriptions of how the site fulfills the science requirements and expectations of in situ martian exploration.
    [Show full text]
  • Warfare in a Fragile World: Military Impact on the Human Environment
    Recent Slprt•• books World Armaments and Disarmament: SIPRI Yearbook 1979 World Armaments and Disarmament: SIPRI Yearbooks 1968-1979, Cumulative Index Nuclear Energy and Nuclear Weapon Proliferation Other related •• 8lprt books Ecological Consequences of the Second Ihdochina War Weapons of Mass Destruction and the Environment Publish~d on behalf of SIPRI by Taylor & Francis Ltd 10-14 Macklin Street London WC2B 5NF Distributed in the USA by Crane, Russak & Company Inc 3 East 44th Street New York NY 10017 USA and in Scandinavia by Almqvist & WikseH International PO Box 62 S-101 20 Stockholm Sweden For a complete list of SIPRI publications write to SIPRI Sveavagen 166 , S-113 46 Stockholm Sweden Stoekholol International Peace Research Institute Warfare in a Fragile World Military Impact onthe Human Environment Stockholm International Peace Research Institute SIPRI is an independent institute for research into problems of peace and conflict, especially those of disarmament and arms regulation. It was established in 1966 to commemorate Sweden's 150 years of unbroken peace. The Institute is financed by the Swedish Parliament. The staff, the Governing Board and the Scientific Council are international. As a consultative body, the Scientific Council is not responsible for the views expressed in the publications of the Institute. Governing Board Dr Rolf Bjornerstedt, Chairman (Sweden) Professor Robert Neild, Vice-Chairman (United Kingdom) Mr Tim Greve (Norway) Academician Ivan M£ilek (Czechoslovakia) Professor Leo Mates (Yugoslavia) Professor
    [Show full text]
  • “Mining” Water Ice on Mars an Assessment of ISRU Options in Support of Future Human Missions
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration “Mining” Water Ice on Mars An Assessment of ISRU Options in Support of Future Human Missions Stephen Hoffman, Alida Andrews, Kevin Watts July 2016 Agenda • Introduction • What kind of water ice are we talking about • Options for accessing the water ice • Drilling Options • “Mining” Options • EMC scenario and requirements • Recommendations and future work Acknowledgement • The authors of this report learned much during the process of researching the technologies and operations associated with drilling into icy deposits and extract water from those deposits. We would like to acknowledge the support and advice provided by the following individuals and their organizations: – Brian Glass, PhD, NASA Ames Research Center – Robert Haehnel, PhD, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers/Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory – Patrick Haggerty, National Science Foundation/Geosciences/Polar Programs – Jennifer Mercer, PhD, National Science Foundation/Geosciences/Polar Programs – Frank Rack, PhD, University of Nebraska-Lincoln – Jason Weale, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers/Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory Mining Water Ice on Mars INTRODUCTION Background • Addendum to M-WIP study, addressing one of the areas not fully covered in this report: accessing and mining water ice if it is present in certain glacier-like forms – The M-WIP report is available at http://mepag.nasa.gov/reports.cfm • The First Landing Site/Exploration Zone Workshop for Human Missions to Mars (October 2015) set the target
    [Show full text]
  • Mariner to Mercury, Venus and Mars
    NASA Facts National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, CA 91109 Mariner to Mercury, Venus and Mars Between 1962 and late 1973, NASA’s Jet carry a host of scientific instruments. Some of the Propulsion Laboratory designed and built 10 space- instruments, such as cameras, would need to be point- craft named Mariner to explore the inner solar system ed at the target body it was studying. Other instru- -- visiting the planets Venus, Mars and Mercury for ments were non-directional and studied phenomena the first time, and returning to Venus and Mars for such as magnetic fields and charged particles. JPL additional close observations. The final mission in the engineers proposed to make the Mariners “three-axis- series, Mariner 10, flew past Venus before going on to stabilized,” meaning that unlike other space probes encounter Mercury, after which it returned to Mercury they would not spin. for a total of three flybys. The next-to-last, Mariner Each of the Mariner projects was designed to have 9, became the first ever to orbit another planet when two spacecraft launched on separate rockets, in case it rached Mars for about a year of mapping and mea- of difficulties with the nearly untried launch vehicles. surement. Mariner 1, Mariner 3, and Mariner 8 were in fact lost The Mariners were all relatively small robotic during launch, but their backups were successful. No explorers, each launched on an Atlas rocket with Mariners were lost in later flight to their destination either an Agena or Centaur upper-stage booster, and planets or before completing their scientific missions.
    [Show full text]
  • Planetary Geology GEOLOGY 307 Spring 2018 Tuesday & Thursday 9:30 -10:50 A.M
    Planetary Geology GEOLOGY 307 Spring 2018 Tuesday & Thursday 9:30 -10:50 a.m. C. M. Bailey Office- McStreet Hall 215 x12445 [email protected] Preamble Space, the Final Frontier! Although the Earth provides a rich tapestry for geologists, other planetary bodies in our Solar System are equally worthy of study. Many of the same processes that operate on Earth modify these worlds, but each planet is unique in many respects. Planetary bodies also contain a record of the solar system’s history. The goals of this course include a better understanding of the processes that operate on distant worlds, gaining insight into how the Solar System has changed through time, and thinking about the future opportunties in planetary science. This class will not simply be a tour of the planets, nor will it attempt to answer all the questions normally dealt with in Astronomy and Cosmology courses. We will start from observations and use a judicious amount of mathematics, physics, and chemistry to achieve our goals. At semester’s end we hope you will have developed an understanding of the Solar System, a sense for the new and exciting discoveries in planetary science, as well as an appreciation of the important questions still to be answered. Week Dates Topic Readings 1 Jan. 18 Planetary Geology Introduced WHOOPS! Ch. 1 2 Jan. 23, 25 Planetary Geology Introduced Ch. 1 The Universe: matter, stars, planets, and life- oh my! 3 Jan. 30, Feb. 1 Celestial Mechanics Ch. 2 Ch. 5, pg. 64-67 4 Feb. 6, 8 Solar System Formation Meteorites are Mighty Important 5 Feb.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Model of the Crustal Magnetic Field of Mars Using MGS and MAVEN
    RESEARCH ARTICLE A New Model of the Crustal Magnetic Field of Mars Using 10.1029/2018JE005854 MGS and MAVEN Key Points: 1 1 2 3 • MGS and MAVEN magnetic field Benoit Langlais , Erwan Thébault , Aymeric Houliez , Michael E. Purucker , 4 measurements are combined into a and Robert J. Lillis high-resolution magnetic field model • The new model extends up to SH 1Laboratoire de Planétologie et Géodynamique, Université de Nantes, Université d'Angers, CNRS, UMR 6112, Nantes, degree 134, corresponding to 160-km France, 2Observatoire Royal de Belgique, Uccle, Belgium, 3Planetary Magnetospheres Laboratory, NASA Goddard horizontal resolution at the Martian Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA, 4Space Science Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA surface • It enables local studies, where geologic and magnetic features can be compared Abstract While devoid of an active magnetic dynamo field today, Mars possesses a remanent magnetic field that may reach several thousand nanoteslas locally. The exact origin and the events that have shaped the crustal magnetization remain largely enigmatic. Three magnetic field data sets from two spacecraft Supporting Information: • Supporting Information S1 collected over 13 cumulative years have sampled the Martian magnetic field over a range of altitudes •TableS1 from 90 up to 6,000 km: (a) Mars Global Surveyor (MGS) magnetometer (1997–2006), (b) MGS Electron Reflectometer (1999–2006), and (c) Mars Atmosphere and Volatile EvolutioN (MAVEN) magnetometer Correspondence to: (2014 to today). In this paper we combine these complementary data sets for the first time to build a new B. Langlais, model of the Martian internal magnetic field. This new model improves upon previous ones in several [email protected] aspects: comprehensive data coverage, refined data selection scheme, modified modeling scheme, discrete-to-continuous transformation of the model, and increased model resolution.
    [Show full text]
  • March 21–25, 2016
    FORTY-SEVENTH LUNAR AND PLANETARY SCIENCE CONFERENCE PROGRAM OF TECHNICAL SESSIONS MARCH 21–25, 2016 The Woodlands Waterway Marriott Hotel and Convention Center The Woodlands, Texas INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT Universities Space Research Association Lunar and Planetary Institute National Aeronautics and Space Administration CONFERENCE CO-CHAIRS Stephen Mackwell, Lunar and Planetary Institute Eileen Stansbery, NASA Johnson Space Center PROGRAM COMMITTEE CHAIRS David Draper, NASA Johnson Space Center Walter Kiefer, Lunar and Planetary Institute PROGRAM COMMITTEE P. Doug Archer, NASA Johnson Space Center Nicolas LeCorvec, Lunar and Planetary Institute Katherine Bermingham, University of Maryland Yo Matsubara, Smithsonian Institute Janice Bishop, SETI and NASA Ames Research Center Francis McCubbin, NASA Johnson Space Center Jeremy Boyce, University of California, Los Angeles Andrew Needham, Carnegie Institution of Washington Lisa Danielson, NASA Johnson Space Center Lan-Anh Nguyen, NASA Johnson Space Center Deepak Dhingra, University of Idaho Paul Niles, NASA Johnson Space Center Stephen Elardo, Carnegie Institution of Washington Dorothy Oehler, NASA Johnson Space Center Marc Fries, NASA Johnson Space Center D. Alex Patthoff, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Cyrena Goodrich, Lunar and Planetary Institute Elizabeth Rampe, Aerodyne Industries, Jacobs JETS at John Gruener, NASA Johnson Space Center NASA Johnson Space Center Justin Hagerty, U.S. Geological Survey Carol Raymond, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Lindsay Hays, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Paul Schenk,
    [Show full text]