DOCSLIB.ORG

Palcan 31 Table of Contents

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Palcan 31 Table of Contents TABLE OF COnTEnTs FOREWORD...............................................................................................................................................................................1 Jean-Bernard Caron PREFacE ....................................................................................................................................................................................7 Paul A. Johnston and Kimberley J. Johnston ThE cambRiDgE UnivERsiTy–gEOlOgical sURvEy OF canaDa ExcavaTiOn OF ThE bURgEss shalE in 1967 David L. Bruton ABSTRACT ..................................................................................................................................................................................9 ACKnowLeDgemenTS ..........................................................................................................................................................9 PRePARATIon ..........................................................................................................................................................................10 BURgeSS PASS ........................................................................................................................................................................10 woRK AT THe QUARRY ........................................................................................................................................................11 CAmP LIFe ................................................................................................................................................................................11 wILD LIFe .................................................................................................................................................................................16 THe enD ....................................................................................................................................................................................16 ReFeRenCeS ...........................................................................................................................................................................17 WhaT is a PhylUm? sysTEmaTics, EvOlUTiOn anD ThE bURgEss shalE Keynyn Brysse ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................................................................................19 InTRoDUCTIon ......................................................................................................................................................................20 ACKnowLeDgmenTS ..........................................................................................................................................................21 CHAngIng InTeRPReTATIonS oF THe BURgeSS SHALe ...........................................................................................22 THe SHAPe oF moRPHoLogICAL DISPARITY ................................................................................................................22 THe oCCUPATIon AnD nAVIgATIon oF moRPHoSPACe ............................................................................................24 goULD’S moRPHospace moDeL: YoU CAn’T geT THeRe FRom HeRe ...............................................................25 Conway moRRIS’S moRPHospace moDeL: nARRow RoADS oF PoTenTIALITY ............................................26 eVoLUTIonARY ConSTRAInTS; ADAPTATIonISm VeRSUS STRUCTURALISm ....................................................27 wHAT IS A PHYLUm? .............................................................................................................................................................30 PHYLA AnD BoDYPLAnS .................................................................................................................................................30 GoULD AS weAK eSSenTIALIST; Conway moRRIS AS CLASSIC DARwInIST .................................................31 PHASe 3: A LIneAge-BASeD DeFInITIon oF PHYLA ...............................................................................................32 ConCLUSIon ...........................................................................................................................................................................35 PHYLA AnD THe BURgeSS SHALe ................................................................................................................................35 FUTURe PoSSIBILITIeS ....................................................................................................................................................35 ReFeRenCeS ...........................................................................................................................................................................36 ThE DEvElOPmEnT OF miD-cambRian liThOsTRaTigRaPhical nOmEnclaTURE in ThE viciniTy OF ThE bURgEss shalE, KicKing hORsE bElT OF canaDa Terence P. Fletcher ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................................................................................39 InTRoDUCTIon ......................................................................................................................................................................39 ACKnowLeDgmenTS ..........................................................................................................................................................40 1861–1910...................................................................................................................................................................................40 1910–1928...................................................................................................................................................................................43 1928–1954...................................................................................................................................................................................44 1954–1980...................................................................................................................................................................................46 1980–2003...................................................................................................................................................................................48 Rom STUDIeS ..........................................................................................................................................................................50 2003–2009...................................................................................................................................................................................55 ISSUeS .......................................................................................................................................................................................57 diffeRentiation oF THe ConTemPoRAneoUS nAISeT AnD moUnT wHYTe FoRmationS ..................57 AITKen’S TAKAKKAw TongUe .....................................................................................................................................59 CatheDRAL FoRmation-TAKAKKAw FoRmation RelationSHIPS In THe KICKIng HoRSe VALLeY ..59 THe oRIgIn oF THe CatheDRAL eSCARPmenT .......................................................................................................62 MonARCH FoRmation In THe KICKIng HoRSe VALLeY .....................................................................................63 Narao-Waputik / PARADox-mARPoLe RelationSHIPS .....................................................................................64 LoCAL DeVeLoPmenTS oF THe BURgeSS SHALe FoRmation ..........................................................................67 EnVIRonmental ConTRoLS ........................................................................................................................................68 ReFeRenCeS ...........................................................................................................................................................................68 a nEW bURgEss shalE-TyPE lOcaliTy in ThE “Thin” sTEPhEn FORmaTiOn, KOOTEnay naTiOnal PaRK, bRiTish cOlUmbia: sTRaTigRaPhic anD PalEOEnviROnmEnTal sETTing Robert R. gaines ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................................................................................73 InTRoDUCTIon ......................................................................................................................................................................74 DePoSITIonAL SeTTIng AnD STRATIgRAPHY oF THe STePHen FoRmATIon ....................................................75 ACKnowLeDgemenTS ........................................................................................................................................................77 meTHoDS .................................................................................................................................................................................77 ReSULTS ....................................................................................................................................................................................77 STRATIgRAPHIC
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Soft−Part Preservation in Two Species of the Arthropod Isoxys from the Middle Cambrian Burgess Shale of British Columbia, Canada
    Soft−part preservation in two species of the arthropod Isoxys from the middle Cambrian Burgess Shale of British Columbia, Canada DIEGO C. GARCÍA−BELLIDO, JEAN VANNIER, and DESMOND COLLINS García−Bellido, D.C., Vannier, J., and Collins, D. 2009. Soft−part preservation in two species of the arthropod Isoxys from the middle Cambrian Burgess Shale of British Columbia, Canada. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 54 (4): 699–712. doi:10.4202/app.2009.0024 More than forty specimens from the middle Cambrian Burgess Shale reveal the detailed anatomy of Isoxys, a worldwide distributed bivalved arthropod represented here by two species, namely Isoxys acutangulus and Isoxys longissimus. I. acutangulus had a non−mineralized headshield with lateral pleural folds (= “valves” of previous authors) that covered the animal’s body almost entirely, large frontal spherical eyes and a pair of uniramous prehensile appendages bearing stout spiny outgrowths along their anterior margins. The 13 following appendages had a uniform biramous design—i.e., a short endopod and a paddle−like exopod fringed with marginal setae with a probable natatory function. The trunk ended with a flap−like telson that protruded beyond the posterior margin of the headshield. The gut of I. acutangulus was tube−like, running from mouth to telson, and was flanked with numerous 3D−preserved bulbous, paired features inter− preted as digestive glands. The appendage design of I. acutangulus indicates that the animal was a swimmer and a visual predator living off−bottom. The general anatomy of Isoxys longissimus was similar to that of I. acutangulus although less information is available on the exact shape of its appendages and visual organs.
    [Show full text]
  • PUBLICATIONS by JAMES SPRINKLE 1965 -- Sprinkle, James
    PUBLICATIONS BY JAMES SPRINKLE 1965 -- Sprinkle, James. 1965. Stratigraphy and sedimentary petrology of the lower Lodgepole Formation of southwestern Montana. M.I.T. Department of Geology and Geophysics, unpublished Senior Thesis, 29 p. (see #56 and 66 below) 1966 1. Sprinkle, James and Gutschick, R. C. 1966. Blastoids from the Sappington Formation of southwest Montana (Abst.). Geological Society of America Special Paper 87:163-164. 1967 2. Sprinkle, James and Gutschick, R. C. 1967. Costatoblastus, a channel fill blastoid from the Sappington Formation of Montana. Journal of Paleon- tology, 41(2):385-402. 1968 3. Sprinkle, James. 1968. The "arms" of Caryocrinites, a Silurian rhombiferan cystoid (Abst.). Geological Society of America Special Paper 115:210. 1969 4. Sprinkle, James. 1969. The early evolution of crinozoan and blastozoan echinoderms (Abst.). Geological Society of America Special Paper 121:287-288. 5. Robison, R. A. and Sprinkle, James. 1969. A new echinoderm from the Middle Cambrian of Utah (Abst.). Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, 1(5):69. 6. Robison, R. A. and Sprinkle, James. 1969. Ctenocystoidea: new class of primitive echinoderms. Science, 166(3912):1512-1514. 1970 -- Sprinkle, James. 1970. Morphology and Evolution of Blastozoan Echino- derms. Harvard University Department of Geological Sciences, unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, 433 p. (see #8 below) 1971 7. Sprinkle, James. 1971. Stratigraphic distribution of echinoderm plates in the Antelope Valley Limestone of Nevada and California. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 750-D (Geological Survey Research 1971):D89-D98. 1973 8. Sprinkle, James. 1973. Morphology and Evolution of Blastozoan Echino- derms. Harvard University, Museum of Comparative Zoology Special Publication, 283 p.
    [Show full text]
  • British Columbia Geological Survey Geological Fieldwork 1990
    GEOLOGY OF THE MOUNT BRUSSILOF MAGNESITE DEPOSIT, SOUTHEASTERN BRITISH COLUMBIA (825/12, 13) By George J. Simandl and Kirk D. Hancock KEYWOKLIS: Industrial minerals, rconomic geology. mag- nesitr. Cathedral Formation. Middle Cambrian. dolumitiz- tion, porosity. base metal association, deposit model. INTRODUCTION Magnesite (M&O,) is an induswial mineral that can bc converted into either caustic, fused or dead-burned magne- sia. Dead-burned magnesia is used mainly in the manufac- ture of refractory products; caustic magnesia is used in treatment of water, in animal feedstuffs, fertilizers. magne- sia cements, insulating boards and wood-pulp processing, in chemicals and pharmaceuticals and us a curing agent in rubber (Coope. 19X7). Magnesium metal is produced either from magnesite or from caustic mapnesia. In the short-term future. production of dead-burned mag- nesia is cxpectcd to remain constant. however, demand for caustic magnesia is increasing (Duncan, IYYO). With the increasing trend toward the use of high-perfomxmce “mag- carbon” refractories. future demand for fused magnesia looks promising. A number of magnesite deposits are known in British Columbia (Grzant, 19X7). the most important of these is the Mount Brussilof orebody. It is hosted by dolomites of the TECTONIC SETTING Middle Cambrian Cathedral Formation. The Mount Brussilof deposit is located in the Forekm3 rectonostratiEnlphic belt and within the “Kicking Horse HISTORY Rim”, as defined by Aitken (1971, 1989). It is situated east of a Cambrian bathymetric feature commonly referred to as The Mount Brussilof deposit was discovered during the Cathedral escarpment (Fritz. 1990: Aitken xnd regional mapping by the Geological Survey of Canada Mcllreath, 19X4, 1990).
    [Show full text]
  • Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections
    SMITHSONIAN MISCELLANEOUS COLLECTIONS PART OF VOLUME LIII CAMBRIAN GEOLOGY AND PALEONTOLOGY No. 1.—NOMENCLATURE OF SOME CAMBRfAN CORDILLERAN FORMATIONS BY CHARLES D. WALCOTT No. 1804 CITY OF WASHINGTON PUBLISHED BY THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION April 18, 1908 CAMBRIAN GEOLOGY AND PALEONTOLOGY Xo. I.—NOMENCLATURE OF SOME CAMBRIAN CORDIL- LERAN FORMATIONS By CHARLES- D. WALCOTT In connection with the preparation of the section on the strati- g-raphic distribution of the Cambrian Brachiopoda for Monograph LI, of the L^. S. Geological Survey, I find that it is necessary to refer- to many undefined Cambrian formations of the Cordilleran area. The present paper is published for the information of geologists and for the purpose of properly defining and characterizing the forma- tions in question, as the first reference to these formations should be accompanied by more information than can" well be included in the pages of the monograph. CANADIAN ROCKY MOUNTAINS . Since reading, in 1886, j\Ir. R. G. McConnell's report of 18B5 on his section across the Rocky Mountains in the vicinity of the 51st parallel,^ I have had a strong desire to study the stratigraphy of the Cambrian portion of the section. It was not until the sununer of 1907 that the opportunity came. Accompanied by Mr. Lancaster D. Burling as field assistant, a study was made of the typical Castle ?^Iountain section of Mr. ]\IcConnell, the lower portion of the Mt. Stephen and Mt. Whyte sections, and the full section pi Mt. Bos- worth, on the Continental Divide, which proved to be the most complete. Except where otherwise stated, the sections were carefully meas- ured with rod and clinometer.
    [Show full text]
  • Reconstructions of Late Ordovician Crinoids and Bryozoans from the Decorah Shale, Upper Mississippi Valley Sibo Wang Senior Inte
    Reconstructions of Late Ordovician crinoids and bryozoans from the Decorah Shale, Upper Mississippi Valley Sibo Wang Senior Integrative Exercise March 10, 2010 Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a Bachelor of Arts degree from Carleton College, Northfield, Minnesota TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ 01 GEOLOGIC SETTING ................................................................................................ 03 Late Ordovician world ................................................................................. 03 Southern Minnesota and the Decorah Shale ............................................... 03 Benthic community ....................................................................................... 05 Marine conditions ........................................................................................ 05 CRINOIDS ................................................................................................................. 06 General background and fossil record ........................................................ 06 Anatomy ....................................................................................................... 07 Decorah Shale crinoids ................................................................................10 BRYOZOANS ............................................................................................................. 10 General background and
    [Show full text]
  • The Weeks Formation Konservat-Lagerstätte and the Evolutionary Transition of Cambrian Marine Life
    Downloaded from http://jgs.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on October 1, 2021 Review focus Journal of the Geological Society Published Online First https://doi.org/10.1144/jgs2018-042 The Weeks Formation Konservat-Lagerstätte and the evolutionary transition of Cambrian marine life Rudy Lerosey-Aubril1*, Robert R. Gaines2, Thomas A. Hegna3, Javier Ortega-Hernández4,5, Peter Van Roy6, Carlo Kier7 & Enrico Bonino7 1 Palaeoscience Research Centre, School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia 2 Geology Department, Pomona College, Claremont, CA 91711, USA 3 Department of Geology, Western Illinois University, 113 Tillman Hall, 1 University Circle, Macomb, IL 61455, USA 4 Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK 5 Museum of Comparative Zoology and Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, 26 Oxford Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA 6 Department of Geology, Ghent University, Krijgslaan 281/S8, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium 7 Back to the Past Museum, Carretera Cancún, Puerto Morelos, Quintana Roo 77580, Mexico R.L.-A., 0000-0003-2256-1872; R.R.G., 0000-0002-3713-5764; T.A.H., 0000-0001-9067-8787; J.O.-H., 0000-0002- 6801-7373 * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: The Weeks Formation in Utah is the youngest (c. 499 Ma) and least studied Cambrian Lagerstätte of the western USA. It preserves a diverse, exceptionally preserved fauna that inhabited a relatively deep water environment at the offshore margin of a carbonate platform, resembling the setting of the underlying Wheeler and Marjum formations. However, the Weeks fauna differs significantly in composition from the other remarkable biotas of the Cambrian Series 3 of Utah, suggesting a significant Guzhangian faunal restructuring.
    [Show full text]
  • A Solution to Darwin's Dilemma: Differential Taphonomy of Ediacaran and Palaeozoic Non-Mineralised Discoidal Fossils
    Provided by the author(s) and NUI Galway in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite the published version when available. Title A Solution to Darwin's Dilemma: Differential Taphonomy of Ediacaran and Palaeozoic Non-Mineralised Discoidal Fossils Author(s) MacGabhann, Breandán Anraoi Publication Date 2012-08-29 Item record http://hdl.handle.net/10379/3406 Downloaded 2021-09-26T20:57:04Z Some rights reserved. For more information, please see the item record link above. A Solution to Darwin’s Dilemma: Differential taphonomy of Palaeozoic and Ediacaran non- mineralised discoidal fossils Volume 1 of 2 Breandán Anraoi MacGabhann Supervisor: Dr. John Murray Earth and Ocean Sciences, School of Natural Sciences, NUI Galway August 2012 Differential taphonomy of Palaeozoic and Ediacaran non-mineralised fossils Table of Contents List of Figures ........................................................................................................... ix List of Tables ........................................................................................................... xxi Taxonomic Statement ........................................................................................... xxiii Acknowledgements ................................................................................................ xxv Abstract ................................................................................................................. xxix 1. Darwin’s Dilemma ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • J32 the Importance of the Burgess Shale < Soft Bodied Fauna >
    580 Chapter j PALEOCONTINENTS The Present is the Key to the Past: HUGH RANCE j32 The importance of the Burgess shale < soft bodied fauna > Only about 33 animal body plans are presently [sic] being used on this planet (Margulis and Schwartz, 1988). —Scott F. Gilbert, Developmental Biology, 1991.1 Almost all animal phyla known today were already present by 505 million years ago— the age of the Burgess shale, Middle Cambrian marine sediments, discovered at the Kicking Horse rim, British Columbia, in 1909 by Charles Doolittle Walcott, that provide a unique window on life without hard parts that had continued to exist shortly after the time of the Cambrian explosion (see Topic j34).2 Legend has it that Walcott, then secretary of the Smithsonian Institution, vacationing near Field, British Columbia, was thrown from a horse carrying him, when it tripped on, and split open a stray fallen slab of shale. Walcott, with his face literally rubbed in it, saw strange, but not hallucinational, forms crisply etched in black against the blue-black bedding surface of the shale: a bonanza of fossils of sea creatures without mineralized shells or backbones. Many are preserved whole; including those with articulated organic (biodegradable) exoskeletons. Details of even their soft body parts can be seen (best using PTM)3 as silvery films (formed of phyllosilicates on a coating of kerogenized carbon) that commonly outline even the most delicate structures on the fossilized animal.4 The Burgess shale is part of the Stephen Formation of greenish shales and thin-bedded limestones, which is a marine-offlap deposit between the thick, massive, carbonates of the overlying Eldon formation, and the underlying Cathedral formation.6 As referenced in the Geological Atlas of the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin - Chapter 8, the Stephen Formation has been “informally divided into a normal, ‘thin Stephen’ on the platform areas and a ‘thick Stephen’ west of the Cathedral Escarpment.
    [Show full text]
  • THE ECHINODERM NEWSLETTER Number 22. 1997 Editor: Cynthia Ahearn Smithsonian Institution National Museum of Natural History Room
    •...~ ..~ THE ECHINODERM NEWSLETTER Number 22. 1997 Editor: Cynthia Ahearn Smithsonian Institution National Museum of Natural History Room W-31S, Mail Stop 163 Washington D.C. 20560, U.S.A. NEW E-MAIL: [email protected] Distributed by: David Pawson Smithsonian Institution National Museum of Natural History Room W-321, Mail Stop 163 Washington D.C. 20560, U.S.A. The newsletter contains information concerning meetings and conferences, publications of interest to echinoderm biologists, titles of theses on echinoderms, and research interests, and addresses of echinoderm biologists. Individuals who desire to receive the newsletter should send their name, address and research interests to the editor. The newsletter is not intended to be a part of the scientific literature and should not be cited, abstracted, or reprinted as a published document. A. Agassiz, 1872-73 ., TABLE OF CONTENTS Echinoderm Specialists Addresses Phone (p-) ; Fax (f-) ; e-mail numbers . ........................ .1 Current Research ........•... .34 Information Requests .. .55 Announcements, Suggestions .. • .56 Items of Interest 'Creeping Comatulid' by William Allison .. .57 Obituary - Franklin Boone Hartsock .. • .58 Echinoderms in Literature. 59 Theses and Dissertations ... 60 Recent Echinoderm Publications and Papers in Press. ...................... • .66 New Book Announcements Life and Death of Coral Reefs ......•....... .84 Before the Backbone . ........................ .84 Illustrated Encyclopedia of Fauna & Flora of Korea . • •• 84 Echinoderms: San Francisco. Proceedings of the Ninth IEC. • .85 Papers Presented at Meetings (by country or region) Africa. • .96 Asia . ....96 Austral ia .. ...96 Canada..... • .97 Caribbean •. .97 Europe. .... .97 Guam ••• .98 Israel. 99 Japan .. • •.••. 99 Mexico. .99 Philippines .• . .•.•.• 99 South America .. .99 united States .•. .100 Papers Presented at Meetings (by conference) Fourth Temperate Reef Symposium................................•......
    [Show full text]
  • The Leanchoilia-Ottoia Fauna from the Middle Cambrian Burgess Shale of British Columbia
    77 THE LEANCHOILIA-OTTOIA FAUNA FROM THE MIDDLE CAMBRIAN BURGESS SHALE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA. COLLINS, Desmond, Royal ontario Museum, 100 Queen's Park, Toronto, ontario M5S 2C6, CANADA The Leanchoilia-ottoia fauna from the Raymond quarry level of the Burgess Shale is different in both content and average size to the classic Marrel1a-Burgessia fauna excavated by Walcott from the Phyllopod bed just 20 m below. The animals most common in the fauna, Leanchoilia, Ottoia, Sidneyia and Vauxia, are typically 5 to 10 cm in length, whereas Phyllopod bed animals such as Marrella and Burgessia which make up half of this fauna are only 1 to 2 cm in length. This distinct difference also applies to the major predators, where large Anomalocaris and Hurdia dominate the Leanchoilia-ottoia fauna compared to the smaller Laggania in the Phyllopod bed fauna. Along with the different forms, there are elements common to both faunas, such as Choia, Helmetia, Olenoides, Ottoia, Sidneyia, Tuzoia, Vauxia and Waptia. New discoveries include a large jellyfish, a ctenophore, a "sea moth", a benthic sea-cucumber, Isoxys with eyes and appendages, tubular burrows containing commensal worms and the barnacle, Priscansermarinus, previously found in talus. The environment of burial of the two faunas also differs. Most of the Phyllopod bed animals occur within 3 to 6 cm thick bands, indicating transport from elsewhere. In contrast, many of the Leanchoilia-ottoia animals were buried in life position on the bedding planes, inclUding sessile forms such as the sponge, Chancelloria, rooted in the bedding surface and bent over in parallel..
    [Show full text]
  • Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections
    SMITHSONIAN MISCELLANEOUS COLLECTIONS VOLUME 116, NUMBER 5 Cfjarle* £. anb Jfflarp "^Xaux flKHalcott 3Resiearcf) Jf tmb MIDDLE CAMBRIAN STRATIGRAPHY AND FAUNAS OF THE CANADIAN ROCKY MOUNTAINS (With 34 Plates) BY FRANCO RASETTI The Johns Hopkins University Baltimore, Maryland SEP Iff 1951 (Publication 4046) CITY OF WASHINGTON PUBLISHED BY THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION SEPTEMBER 18, 1951 SMITHSONIAN MISCELLANEOUS COLLECTIONS VOLUME 116, NUMBER 5 Cfjarie* B. anb Jfflarp "^Taux OTalcott &egearcf) Jf unb MIDDLE CAMBRIAN STRATIGRAPHY AND FAUNAS OF THE CANADIAN ROCKY MOUNTAINS (With 34 Plates) BY FRANCO RASETTI The Johns Hopkins University Baltimore, Maryland (Publication 4046) CITY OF WASHINGTON PUBLISHED BY THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION SEPTEMBER 18, 1951 BALTIMORE, MD., U. 8. A. CONTENTS PART I. STRATIGRAPHY Page Introduction i The problem I Acknowledgments 2 Summary of previous work 3 Method of work 7 Description of localities and sections 9 Terminology 9 Bow Lake 11 Hector Creek 13 Slate Mountains 14 Mount Niblock 15 Mount Whyte—Plain of Six Glaciers 17 Ross Lake 20 Mount Bosworth 21 Mount Victoria 22 Cathedral Mountain 23 Popes Peak 24 Eiffel Peak 25 Mount Temple 26 Pinnacle Mountain 28 Mount Schaffer 29 Mount Odaray 31 Park Mountain 33 Mount Field : Kicking Horse Aline 35 Mount Field : Burgess Quarry 37 Mount Stephen 39 General description 39 Monarch Creek IS Monarch Mine 46 North Gully and Fossil Gully 47 Cambrian formations : Lower Cambrian S3 St. Piran sandstone 53 Copper boundary of formation ?3 Peyto limestone member 55 Cambrian formations : Middle Cambrian 56 Mount Whyte formation 56 Type section 56 Lithology and thickness 5& Mount Whyte-Cathedral contact 62 Lake Agnes shale lentil 62 Yoho shale lentil "3 iii iv SMITHSONIAN MISCELLANEOUS COLLECTIONS VOL.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cambrian Explosion: How Much Bang for the Buck?
    Essay Book Review The Cambrian Explosion: How Much Bang for the Buck? Ralph Stearley Ralph Stearley THE RISE OF ANIMALS: Evolution and Diversification of the Kingdom Animalia by Mikhail A. Fedonkin, James G. Gehling, Kathleen Grey, Guy M. Narbonne, and Patricia Vickers-Rich. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2007. 327 pages; includes an atlas of Precambrian Metazoans, bibliography, index. Hardcover; $79.00. ISBN: 9780801886799. THE CAMBRIAN EXPLOSION: The Construction of Animal Bio- diversity by Douglas H. Erwin and James W. Valentine. Greenwood Village, CO: Roberts and Company, 2013. 406 pages; includes one appendix, references, index. Hardcover; $60.00. ISBN: 9781936221035. DARWIN’S DOUBT: The Explosive Origin of Animal Life and the Case for Intelligent Design by Stephen C. Meyer. New York: HarperCollins, 2013. 498 pages; includes bibliography and index. Hardcover; $28.99. ISBN: 9780062071477. y the time that Darwin published Later on, this dramatic appearance of B On the Origin of Species in 1859, complicated macroscopic fossils would the principle of biotic succession become known by the shorthand expres- had been well established and proven to sion “Cambrian explosion.” Because the be a powerful aid to correlating strata dispute between Sedgwick and Roderick and deciphering the history of Earth, to Murchisonontheboundarybetweenthe which the rock layers testified. However, Cambrian and Silurian systems had not for Darwin, there remained a major been fully resolved by 1859, Darwin con- issue regarding fossils for his compre- sidered these fossils “Silurian” (and thus hensive explanation for the history of for him, the issue would have been life. The problem was this: the base of labeled the “Silurian explosion”!).
    [Show full text]