DOCSLIB.ORG

Erskine May's Treatise on the Law, Privileges, Proceedings and Usage of Parliament Twenty-Second Edition

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Erskine May's Treatise on the Law, Privileges, Proceedings and Usage of Parliament Twenty-Second Edition Erskine May's Treatise on The Law, Privileges, Proceedings and Usage of Parliament Twenty-second Edition Editors Sir Donald Limon, KCB Clerk of the House of Commons W R McKay, CB Clerk Assistant, House of Commons Assistant Editors House of Commons G Cubie Principal Clerk, Table Office R J Willoughby Registrar of Members' Interests W A Proctor Clerk of Standing Committees and Clerk of Private Bills HEIrwin Second Clerk of Select Committees House of Lords E C Ollard Clerk of Public Bills Butterworths London 1997 CONTENTS Preface vii Table of Abbreviations xlvi PART I CONSTITUTION, POWERS AND PRIVILEGES OF PARLIAMENT Introduction 3 Chapter 1 The constituent parts of Parliament Introductory 9 The Sovereign 10 The House of Lords 12 Lords Spiritual 12 Lords Temporal 12 Disclaimer of peerage 13 Peers of Ireland 14 Expenses of Members of the House of Lords 14 The House of Commons 15 Representation in the House of Commons 15 Financial status of the House of Commons 18 Payment of Members 18 Increase in payment of Members 19 Salaries of Members who are Officers of the House, Ministers of the Crown, Leader of the Opposition, Opposition Whips 20 Travelling expenses of Members 22 Members' Fund 23 Parliamentary Contributory Pension Fund 24 History of Parliament Trust 25 Chapter 2 Elections The Electorate 26 Disqualification of electors 27 Constituencies 27 Registration of electors 28 Registration officers 29 Postal and proxy voting 29 The holding of elections 29 Election campaigns 30 xi xii Contents New writs 31 Vacancies during a session 31 Period for presenting petitions 31 Vacancy by peerage 31 Supersedeas to writs 32 Issue warrants by the Speaker during adjournment or recess 32 Appointment of Members to issue writs 33 Manner of issue of writs 33 Return of writs 34 Correction of error in return 34 Failure to make return to writ 34 Members returned for two places 34 Equality of votes cast 35 Trial of controverted elections 35 Procedure under the Representation of the People Act 1983 35 Proceedings of the House in matters of election 36 Proceedings of House upon determination of election trials 36 Corrupt practices 37 Chapter 3 Disqualification for membership of either House Disqualification for membership of the House of Lords 38 Aliens 38 Persons under twenty-one 38 Bankruptcy 38 Treason 39 Mental Health Act 1983 39 Disqualification by sentence of the House 39 Disqualification for membership of the House of Commons 40 Aliens 40 Persons under twenty-one 40 Mental illness 40 Peers 41 Bankruptcy 41 Treason 42 Other crimes 42 Corrupt practices at elections 42 Clergy 43 Returning officers 44 Petitioning candidates 44 Disqualification of certain office-holders 44 Non-political office 44 Public service disqualification 45 Disqualification by particular office 46 Chiltern Hundreds and Manor of Northstead 47 Effect and disregard of disqualification 48 Jurisdiction of the Privy Council in disqualification 49 Penalties 49 Amendment of House of Commons Disqualification Act 1975 50 Political office 50 Contents xiii Chapter 4 Power and jurisdiction of Parliament Extent of legislative authority of Parliament 52 Commonwealth legislation 53 The European Communities Act 1972 54 Extent of the Prerogative of the Crown in reference to Parliament 55 Annual meeting of Parliament 55 Summons 55 Demise of the Crown 56 Causes of summons 56 Prorogation 56 Effect of a prorogation 57 Meeting of Parliament accelerated or deferred by proclamation 57 Meeting of Parliament accelerated pursuant to statute 57 Meeting for despatch of business 57 Adjournment 58 Dissolution 58 Rights and functions of the House of Lords 59 House of Lords as a Court of Judicature 60 Principal power of the Commons 63 Ministerial accountability to Parliament 63 Power to summon witnesses 64 Chapter 5 The privilege of Parliament What constitutes privilege 65 Lords: Privileges of Parliament and of peerage 67 Historical development of privilege 68 Freedom of speech 69 Freedom from arrest 72 Freedom of access 78 Favourable construction 78 Privilege with respect to the constitution of the House 79 Penal jurisdiction 80 Modern application of privilege law 81 Chapter 6 Privilege of freedom of speech Freedom of speech in debate 83 Publication of debates or proceedings 84 Commons 85 Lords 85 Publication outside Parliament of proceedings and debates in Parliament 86 Exclusive cognisance of proceedings 88 Article IX of the Bill of Rights 93 'Impeached' and 'questioned' 93 'Proceedings in Parliament' 95 Implied amendment, etc 97 Proceedings, precincts and criminal acts 98 xiv Contents Chapter 7 Privilege of freedom from arrest Criminal law and statutory detention 100 House to be informed of arrests 100 House to be informed of sentences for criminal offences 101 Statutory detention 102 Contempt of court 102 Bankruptcy 104 Detention under the Mental Health Act 104 Privileges related to freedom from arrest 105 Admissibility of Members as bail 105 Members summoned as witnesses 105 Exemption from jury service 106 Duration of the privilege of freedom from arrest 106 House of Lords 106 House of Commons 107 Privilege extending beyond members 107 Chapter 8 Contempts Misconduct in presence of either House or a committee 108 Strangers 108 Witnesses 109 Disobedience to rules or orders of either House or of a Committee 110 General and particular rules 110 Orders of committees 110 Petitions and other documents 111 Misconduct of Members or Officers 111 Members deliberately misleading the House 111 Corruption or impropriety 112 Professional services connected with proceedings 115 Advocacy by Members of matters in which they have been concerned professionally 116 Other misconduct by Members 116 Misconduct by officers 116 Constructive contempts 117 Reflections on either House 117 Publication of false or perverted reports of debates 117 Premature publication or disclosure of committee proceedings 118 Other indignities offered to either House 120 Obstructing Members of either House in the discharge of their duty 121 Arrest 121 Molestation, reflections and intimidation 121 Improper influence 124 Misrepresenting Members 125 Obstructing officers of either House 125 Obstruction or molestation 125 Legal proceedings against officers, etc 126 Obstructing witnesses and others 126 Arrest 126 Contents xv Molestation of or interference with witnesses 126 Tampering with witnesses 127 Legal proceedings against witnesses 128 Protection of petitioners and others with business before Parliament or with Members 128 Constituents and others in communication with Members 129 Chapter 9 Penal jurisdiction of both Houses Committal 131 Warrants of committal 133 Protection of officers in executing warrants 134 Warrants of committal and the courts 135 Committal without warrant 136 Period of committal and discharge 137 Punishment of strangers other than by committal 138 Fines 138 Reprimand or admonition 138 Prosecution of offenders 139 Punishment of Members 139 Reprimand or admonition 140 Suspension 140 Expulsion 141 Power of both Houses to secure attendance of persons on matters of privilege 142 Power to send for persons in custody 142 Chapter 10 Complaints of breach of privilege or contempt Raising a complaint 144 Hearing of counsel 145 Consideration of reports of committees on complaints 146 Proceedings against Members 148 Complaints against Members or officers of the other House 149 Complaints reported by committees 149 Complaints by officers of either House 150 Disclosure following secret session 151 Chapter 11 The courts and parliamentary privilege The opposing views 153 First phase of the conflict 155 The second phase: the nineteenth century 160 Early and mid-twentieth century 164 Later twentieth century cases 165 xvi Contents PART II PROCEEDINGS IN PARLIAMENT: PUBLIC BUSINESS Chapter 12 Precincts and organization of Parliament Palace of Westminster 175 General arrangements 175 Chambers of the two Houses 176 Places of Members 178 Lords 178 Commons 178 Attendance of Members 179 Leave of absence 179 Lords 179 Commons 180 Access to the Houses of Parliament 180 Admission of strangers 180 Lords 180 Commons 181 Officers of the two Houses 184 Officers of the Lords 184 The Lord Chancellor 184 Deputy Speakers 184 Chairman and Principal Deputy Chairman of Committees 185 Deputy Chairmen of Committees 185 Permanent officers of the Lords 185 Clerk of the Crown in Chancery: Lords and Commons 186 The Gentleman Usher of the Black Rod and Serjeant-at-Arms 187 Officers of the Commons 188 The Speaker of the House of Commons 188 The Speaker as representative of the House of Commons 188 The Speaker as presiding officer of the House of Commons 189 The Speaker's administrative duties 192 Resignation of Speaker 193 Deputy Speaker in the Commons (Standing Orders Nos 2 and 3) 194 The Chairman of Ways and Means 195 Deputy Chairman of Ways and Means 196 Temporary chairmen 197 Principal Permanent Officers of the Commons 197 Internal administration 200 In the House of Lords 201 Offices under the Clerk of Parliaments 201 In the House of Commons 202 The House of Commons Commission 202 Departments in the House of Commons 204 Shorthand writer: Lords and Commons 208 Other statutory officers etc 209 The Comptroller and Auditor General 209 The Public Accounts Commission 209 The Parliamentary Commissioner for Administration 210 Party Machinery in Parliament 210 Contents xvii Changes in procedure effected by party system 210 The Official Opposition 211 Leader of the House of Commons 212 Constitution and financing of party machinery 213 Duties of Whips 213 Party Machinery in the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lords Reform White Paper and Draft Bill
    GS Misc 1004 GENERAL SYNOD House of Lords Reform A Submission from the Archbishops of Canterbury and York to the Parliamentary Joint Committee on the Government’s Draft Bill and White Paper. General principles 1. More than a decade ago, the then Archbishops‟ submission to the Royal Commission on House of Lords Reform said that the test of reform was whether it would enable Parliament as a whole to serve the people better. That has remained the consistent position of Church of England submissions since. 2. As with any constitutional change, it is important, therefore, that there is clarity over the problems that reform is intended to address and a reasonable measure of assurance that the proposed solutions will work and avoid unintended consequences. Fundamental changes to how we are governed should also command a wide measure of consent within the country as well as in Parliament. 3. In his initial response of May 2011 to the White Paper and Draft Bill the Lords Spiritual Convenor, the Bishop of Leicester, said: “Some reform of the Lords is overdue, not least to resolve the problem of its ever-increasing membership. But getting the balance of reform right, so that we retain what is good in our current arrangements, whilst freeing up the House to operate more effectively and efficiently, is crucial.”1 In particular, the proposal to reduce the overall size of the House is welcome. But it is far less clear that wholesale reform of the House of Lords along the lines now envisaged gets the balance right. 4. For so long as the majority of the House of Lords consisted of the hereditary peerage there was manifestly a compelling case for reform.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Select Committee on the Reduction of Standing Committees of Tynwald
    REPORT OF THE SELECT COMMITTEE ON THE REDUCTION OF STANDING COMMITTEES OF TYNWALD t i I. • REPORT OF THE SELECT COMMITTEE ON THE REDUCTION OF STANDING COMMITTEES OF TYNWALD To the Honourable Noel Q Cringle, President of Tynwald, and the Honourable Members of the Council and Keys in Tynwald assembled PART 1 INTRODUCTION 1. Background At the sitting of Tynwald Court on 21st May 2002 it was resolved that a Select Committee of five members be established to - "investigate and report by no later than July 2003 on the feasibility of reducing the number of Standing Committees of Tynwald along with any recommendations as to the responsibilities and membership and any proposals for change." 2. Mr Karran, Mr Lowey, Mr Quayle, Mr Quine and Mr Speaker were elected. At 4, the first meeting Mr Speaker was unanimously elected as Chairman. 3. The Committee has held four meetings. C/RSC/02/plb PART 2 STRATEGY 2.1 The Committees of Tynwald that would be examined were determined as: Committee on Constitutional Matters; Committee on the Declaration of Members' Interests, Ecclesiastical Committee; Committee on Economic Initiatives; Joint Committee on the Emoluments of Certain Public Servants; Committee on Expenditure and Public Accounts; Tynwald Ceremony Arrangements Committee; Tynwald Honours Committee; Tynwald Management Committee; Tynwald Members' Pension Scheme Management Committee; and Tynwald Standing Orders Committee of Tynwald. A brief summary of the membership and terms of reference of each standing committee is attached as Appendix 1. 2 C/RSC/02/plb 2.2 In order to facilitate its investigation your Committee also decided that - (a) Comparative information on committee structures in adjacent parliaments should be obtained.
    [Show full text]
  • New Peers Created Have Fallen from 244 Under David Cameron’S Six Years As Prime Minister to Only 37 to Date Under Theresa May
    \ For more information on DeHavilland and how we can help with political monitoring, custom research and consultancy, contact: +44 (0)20 3033 3870 [email protected] Information Services Ltd 2018 0 www.dehavilland.co.uk INTRODUCTION & ANALYSIS ............................................................................................................. 2 CONSERVATIVES ........................................................................................................................................ 4 Diana Barran MBE .......................................................................................................................................................... 4 The Rt. Hon. Sir Edward Garnier QC ........................................................................................................................... 5 The Rt. Hon. Sir Alan Haselhurst.................................................................................................................................. 7 The Rt. Hon. Peter Lilley ................................................................................................................................................ 8 Catherine Meyer CBE ................................................................................................................................................... 10 The Rt. Hon. Sir Eric Pickles ........................................................................................................................................ 11 The Rt. Hon. Sir John
    [Show full text]
  • Hong Kong British National (Overseas) Visa 4
    BRIEFING PAPER Number CBP 8939, 5 May 2021 Hong Kong British By Melanie Gower National (Overseas) visa Esme Kirk-Wade Contents: 1. Background to British National (Overseas) status 2. Calls to extend BN(O) immigration and citizenship rights 3. The new Hong Kong British National (Overseas) visa 4. The BN(O) visa: topical issues www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary 2 Hong Kong British National (Overseas) visa Contents Summary 3 1. Background to British National (Overseas) status 5 1.1 Acquiring BN(O) status: legislation 5 1.2 Immigration and citizenship rights historically conferred by BN(O) status 6 2. Calls to extend BN(O) immigration and citizenship rights 10 2.1 Until May 2020 10 2.2 Summer 2020: Announcement of a new visa route for BN(O)s 11 2.3 Ten Minute Rule Bill: Hong Kong Bill 2019-21 13 3. The new Hong Kong British National (Overseas) visa 14 3.1 Policy, legislation and guidance 14 3.2 Practical details 14 3.3 More generous terms than other visa categories? 18 4. The BN(O) visa: topical issues 19 4.1 How many people might come to the UK? 19 4.2 Integration support and managing the impact on local areas 19 4.3 The gaps in the UK’s offer 21 4.4 What are other countries doing? 21 Cover page image copyright Attribution: Chinese demonstrators, 2019– 20 Hong Kong protests by Studio Incendo – Wikimedia Commons page. Licensed by Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic (CC BY 2.0) / image cropped.
    [Show full text]
  • Order Paper for Tue 19 Jan 2021
    Tuesday 19 January 2021 Order Paper No.161: Part 1 SUMMARY AGENDA: CHAMBER 11.30am Prayers Afterwards Oral Questions: Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs 12.30pm Urgent Questions, including on: Visa arrangements for UK musicians in the European Union (Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport) Afterwards Ministerial Statements (if any) Up to 20 Ten Minute Rule Motion: minutes Freedom of Speech (Universities) (Mr David Davis) No debate Trade Bill: Programme (No. 2) (Motion) 2 Tuesday 19 January 2021 OP No.161: Part 1 Up to four Trade Bill: Consideration of Lords hours* Amendments *(if the Trade Bill: Programme (No. 2) (Motion) is agreed to) Until any Business of the House (High hour** Speed Rail (West Midlands - Crewe) Bill) (Motion) **(if the 7.00pm Business of the House Motion is agreed to) Up to one High Speed Rail (West Midlands hour from - Crewe) Bill: Consideration of commencement Lords Amendments of proceedings ***(if the Business of the House on the Business (High Speed Rail (West Midlands - of the House Crewe) Bill) (Motion) is agreed to) (High Speed Rail (West Midlands - Crewe) Bill)*** No debate Presentation of Public Petitions Until 7.30pm or Adjournment Debate: Animal for half an hour charities and the covid-19 outbreak (Sir David Amess) Tuesday 19 January 2021 OP No.161: Part 1 3 CONTENTS CONTENTS PART 1: BUSINESS TODAY 4 Chamber 11 Written Statements 13 Committees Meeting Today 22 Committee Reports Published Today 23 Announcements 28 Further Information PART 2: FUTURE BUSINESS 32 A. Calendar of Business Notes: Item marked [R] indicates that a member has declared a relevant interest.
    [Show full text]
  • 6FFLK015: Advanced Constitutional Law | King's College London
    09/27/21 6FFLK015: Advanced Constitutional Law | King's College London 6FFLK015: Advanced Constitutional Law View Online 1 Bradley AW, Ewing KD, Knight C. Constitutional and administrative law. Seventeenth edition. Harlow, England: : Pearson 2018. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kcl/detail.action?docID=5418645 2 De Smith SA, Brazier R. Constitutional and administrative law. 8th ed. London: : Penguin 1998. 3 Turpin CC, Tomkins A. British government and the constitution: text and materials. 7th ed. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2011. http://kcl.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=775039 4 Le Sueur AP, Sunkin M, Murkens JE. Public law: text, cases, and materials. Third edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: : Oxford University Press 2016. 5 McEldowney JF. Public law. 3rd ed. London: : Sweet & Maxwell 2002. 6 Phillips OH, Jackson P, Leopold P. O. Hood Phillips & Jackson’s constitutional and 1/58 09/27/21 6FFLK015: Advanced Constitutional Law | King's College London administrative law. 8th ed. London: : Sweet & Maxwell 2001. 7 Loveland I. Constitutional law, administrative law, and human rights: a critical introduction. Eighth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: : Oxford University Press 2018. 8 Barnett H. Constitutional & administrative law. Twelfth edition. London: : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group 2017. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kcl/detail.action?docID=4917664 9 Jowell JL, Oliver D. The changing constitution. Eighth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: : Oxford University Press 2015. 10 Munro CR. Studies in constitutional law. 2nd ed. London: : Butterworths 1999. 11 Tomkins A. Public law. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2003. 12 Marshall G. Constitutional conventions: the rules and forms of political accountability. Oxford: : Clarendon 1984. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198762027.001.0001 13 Griffith JAG, Ryle M, Wheeler-Booth MAJ, et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Part 2 Chapter 3 Such Privileges As Were Imported by the A…
    Chapter 3 Such privileges as were imported by the adoption of the Bill of Rights 3.1 Statutory recognition of the freedom of speech for members of the Parliament of New South Wales The most fundamental parliamentary privilege is the privilege of freedom of speech. In Australia, there is no restriction on what may be said by elected representatives speaking in Parliament. Freedom of political speech is considered essential in order to ensure that the Parliament can carry out its role of scrutinising the operation of the government of the day, and inquiring into matters of public concern. The statutory recognition of this privilege is founded in the Bill of Rights 1688 . Article 9 provides: The freedome of speech and debates or proceedings in Parlyament ought not to be impeached or questioned in any court or place out of Parlyament. Apart from the absolute protection afforded to statements made in Parliament, other privileges which flow from the Bill of Rights include: the right to exclude strangers or visitors; the right to control publication of debates and proceedings; and the protection of witnesses etc. before the Parliament and its committees. 1 Article 9 is in force in New South Wales by operation of the Imperial Acts Application Act 1969.2 Members are protected under this Act from prosecution for anything said during debate in the House or its committees. Despite this, in 1980 Justice McLelland expressed doubts about the applicability of Article 9 to the New South Wales Parliament in Namoi Shire Council v Attorney General. He stated that “art 9 of the Bill of Rights does not purport to apply to any legislature other than the Parliament at Westminster” and therefore, the supposed application of the article, does not extend to the Legislature of New South Wales.
    [Show full text]
  • Reflections on Representation and Reform in the House of Lords
    Our House: Reflections on Representation and Reform in the House of Lords Edited by Caroline Julian About ResPublica ResPublica is an independent, non-partisan UK think tank founded by Phillip Blond in November 2009. In July 2011, the ResPublica Trust was established as a not-for-profit entity which oversees all of ResPublica’s domestic work. We focus on developing practical solutions to enduring socio-economic and cultural problems of our time, such as poverty, asset inequality, family and social breakdown, and environmental degradation. ResPublica Essay Collections ResPublica’s work draws together some of the most exciting thinkers in the UK and internationally to explore the new polices and approaches that will create and deliver a new political settlement. Our network of contributors who advise on and inform our work include leaders from politics, business, civil society and academia. Through our publications, compendiums and website we encourage other thinkers, politicians and members of the public to join the debate and contribute to the development of forward-thinking and innovative ideas. We intend our essay collections to stimulate balanced debate around issues that are fundamental to our core principles. Contents Foreword by Professor John Milbank and Professor Simon Lee, Trustees, 1 The ResPublica Trust 1. Introduction 4 Caroline Julian, ResPublica 2. A Statement from the Government 9 Mark Harper MP, Minister for Political and Constitutional Reform A Social Purpose 3. A Truly Representative House of Lords 13 The Rt Hon Frank Field, MP for Birkenhead 4. Association and Civic Participation 16 Dr Adrian Pabst, University of Kent 5. Bicameralism & Representative Democracy: An International Perspective 23 Rafal Heydel-Mankoo 6.
    [Show full text]
  • The Strange Revival of Bicameralism
    The Strange Revival of Bicameralism Coakley, J. (2014). The Strange Revival of Bicameralism. Journal of Legislative Studies, 20(4), 542-572. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2014.926168 Published in: Journal of Legislative Studies Queen's University Belfast - Research Portal: Link to publication record in Queen's University Belfast Research Portal Publisher rights © 2014 Taylor & Francis. This work is made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Queen's University Belfast Research Portal is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The Research Portal is Queen's institutional repository that provides access to Queen's research output. Every effort has been made to ensure that content in the Research Portal does not infringe any person's rights, or applicable UK laws. If you discover content in the Research Portal that you believe breaches copyright or violates any law, please contact [email protected]. Download date:01. Oct. 2021 Published in Journal of Legislative Studies , 20 (4) 2014, pp. 542-572; doi: 10.1080/13572334.2014.926168 THE STRANGE REVIVAL OF BICAMERALISM John Coakley School of Politics and International Relations University College Dublin School of Politics, International Studies and Philosophy Queen’s University Belfast [email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT The turn of the twenty-first century witnessed a surprising reversal of the long-observed trend towards the disappearance of second chambers in unitary states, with 25 countries— all but one of them unitary—adopting the bicameral system.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Vagrancy Act Repeal Bill
    Vagrancy Act (Repeal) Bill A B I L L TO Make provision to repeal the Vagrancy Act 1824; to make provision about the exercise of certain powers under the Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014 in relation to persons begging or sleeping in public places; and for connected purposes. BE IT ENACTED by the Queen’s most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows: – 1 Repeal of Vagrancy Act 1824 (1) The Vagrancy Act 1824 is repealed. (2) The consequential repeals set out in the Schedule have effect. 2 Interpretation In this Act— “the 2014 Act” means the Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014; “begging” means asking for money on streets or in other public places; and “sleeping rough” refers to homeless people sleeping on streets or in other public places. 3 Enforcement principles The following principles are to be applied in the exercise of powers under the 2014 Act— (a) begging or sleeping rough does not in itself amount to action causing alarm or distress (in the absence of other factors); (b) policing and other enforcement action should balance protection of the community with sensitivity to the problems that cause people to engage in begging or sleeping rough; and (c) powers under the 2014 Act should not in general be used in relation to people sleeping rough, and should be used in relation to people begging only where no other approach is reasonably available.
    [Show full text]
  • Time for Reflection
    All-Party Parliamentary Humanist Group TIME FOR REFLECTION A REPORT OF THE ALL-PARTY PARLIAMENTARY HUMANIST GROUP ON RELIGION OR BELIEF IN THE UK PARLIAMENT The All-Party Parliamentary Humanist Group acts to bring together non-religious MPs and peers to discuss matters of shared interests. More details of the group can be found at https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm/cmallparty/190508/humanist.htm. This report was written by Cordelia Tucker O’Sullivan with assistance from Richy Thompson and David Pollock, both of Humanists UK. Layout and design by Laura Reid. This is not an official publication of the House of Commons or the House of Lords. It has not been approved by either House or its committees. All-Party Groups are informal groups of Members of both Houses with a common interest in particular issues. The views expressed in this report are those of the Group. © All-Party Parliamentary Humanist Group, 2019-20. TIME FOR REFLECTION CONTENTS FOREWORD 4 INTRODUCTION 6 Recommendations 7 THE CHAPLAIN TO THE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF COMMONS 8 BISHOPS IN THE HOUSE OF LORDS 10 Cost of the Lords Spiritual 12 Retired Lords Spiritual 12 Other religious leaders in the Lords 12 Influence of the bishops on the outcome of votes 13 Arguments made for retaining the Lords Spiritual 14 Arguments against retaining the Lords Spiritual 15 House of Lords reform proposals 15 PRAYERS IN PARLIAMENT 18 PARLIAMENT’S ROLE IN GOVERNING THE CHURCH OF ENGLAND 20 Parliamentary oversight of the Church Commissioners 21 ANNEX 1: FORMER LORDS SPIRITUAL IN THE HOUSE OF LORDS 22 ANNEX 2: THE INFLUENCE OF LORDS SPIRITUAL ON THE OUTCOME OF VOTES IN THE HOUSE OF LORDS 24 Votes decided by the Lords Spiritual 24 Votes decided by current and former bishops 28 3 All-Party Parliamentary Humanist Group FOREWORD The UK is more diverse than ever before.
    [Show full text]
  • Selective Abortion Sundari Anitha and Ai
    Making politics visible: Discourses on gender and race in the problematisation of sex- selective abortion Sundari Anitha and Aisha Gill Accepted for publication in Feminist Review Abstract This paper examines the problematisation of sex-selective abortion (SSA) in UK parliamentary debates on Fiona Bruce’s Abortion (Sex-Selection) Bill 2014-15 and on the subsequent proposed amendment to the Serious Crime Bill 2014. On the basis of close textual analysis, we argue that a discursive framing of SSA as a form of cultural oppression of minority women in need of protection underpinned Bruce’s Bill; in contrast, by highlighting issues more commonly articulated in defence of women’s abortion rights, the second set of debates displaced this framing in favour of a broader understanding, drawing on post-colonial feminist critiques, of how socio-economic factors constrain all women in this regard. We argue that the problematisation of SSA explains the original cross-party support for, and subsequent defeat of, the policies proposed to restrict SSA. Our analysis also highlights the central role of ideology in the policy process, thus making politics visible in policy-making. Keywords South Asian women, sex-selective abortion, post-colonial feminism; policy analysis; Serious Crime Bill; Fiona Bruce Introduction In 2012, the Daily Telegraph reported that two doctors working in a private medical practice were prepared to authorise an undercover journalist’s request for an abortion based on the sex of the foetus (Watt et al., 2012). Although transcripts of these conversations revealed that sex had been mentioned in relation to a genetic disorder – which can be sex-specific – in one case, the article omitted this significant detail.
    [Show full text]