DOCSLIB.ORG

6FFLK015: Advanced Constitutional Law | King's College London

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

09/27/21 6FFLK015: Advanced Constitutional Law | King's College London 6FFLK015: Advanced Constitutional Law View Online 1 Bradley AW, Ewing KD, Knight C. Constitutional and administrative law. Seventeenth edition. Harlow, England: : Pearson 2018. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kcl/detail.action?docID=5418645 2 De Smith SA, Brazier R. Constitutional and administrative law. 8th ed. London: : Penguin 1998. 3 Turpin CC, Tomkins A. British government and the constitution: text and materials. 7th ed. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2011. http://kcl.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=775039 4 Le Sueur AP, Sunkin M, Murkens JE. Public law: text, cases, and materials. Third edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: : Oxford University Press 2016. 5 McEldowney JF. Public law. 3rd ed. London: : Sweet & Maxwell 2002. 6 Phillips OH, Jackson P, Leopold P. O. Hood Phillips & Jackson’s constitutional and 1/58 09/27/21 6FFLK015: Advanced Constitutional Law | King's College London administrative law. 8th ed. London: : Sweet & Maxwell 2001. 7 Loveland I. Constitutional law, administrative law, and human rights: a critical introduction. Eighth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: : Oxford University Press 2018. 8 Barnett H. Constitutional & administrative law. Twelfth edition. London: : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group 2017. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kcl/detail.action?docID=4917664 9 Jowell JL, Oliver D. The changing constitution. Eighth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: : Oxford University Press 2015. 10 Munro CR. Studies in constitutional law. 2nd ed. London: : Butterworths 1999. 11 Tomkins A. Public law. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2003. 12 Marshall G. Constitutional conventions: the rules and forms of political accountability. Oxford: : Clarendon 1984. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198762027.001.0001 13 Griffith JAG, Ryle M, Wheeler-Booth MAJ, et al. Griffith & Ryle on Parliament: Functions, practice and procedures. 2nd ed. London: : Sweet & Maxwell 2003. 2/58 09/27/21 6FFLK015: Advanced Constitutional Law | King's College London 14 Parliament. In: Halsbury’s laws of England. London: : Butterworths 2008. 15 Blackburn R. The electoral system in Britain. London: : Macmillan 1995. 16 Blackburn R. King and country: Monarchy and the future King Charles III. [London]: : Politico’s 2006. 17 King A. The British constitution. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199576982.001.0001 18 Bogdanor V. The new British constitution. Oxford: : Hart 2009. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN =1157040 19 Bogdanor V. The coalition and the constitution. Oxford: : Hart 2011. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kcl/detail.action?docID=1772963 20 Bogdanor V. The monarchy and the constitution. Oxford: : Clarendon Press 1995. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/0198293348.001.0001 21 Brazier R. Constitutional practice: the foundations of British government. 3rd ed. [Oxford: : Oxford University Press 1999. 3/58 09/27/21 6FFLK015: Advanced Constitutional Law | King's College London 22 Brazier R. Constitutional reform: Reshaping the British political system. 3rd ed. [Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2008. 23 Oliver D. Constitutional reform in the United Kingdom. [Oxford]: : Oxford University Press 2003. 24 Reforming the constitution. London: : Frank Cass 2000. 25 Barber NW. The constitutional state. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199585014.001.0001 26 Leyland P. The constitution of the United Kingdom: a contextual analysis. Third edition. Oxford: : Hart Publishing 2016. 27 Ward I. The English Constitution: Myths and Realities. Oxford: : Hart Pub 2004. http://kcl.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=270795 28 Dobner P, Loughlin M. The twilight of constitutionalism? Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199585007.001.0001 29 4/58 09/27/21 6FFLK015: Advanced Constitutional Law | King's College London Goldsworthy J. Parliamentary Sovereignty: Contemporary Debates. Leiden: : Cambridge University Press 2010. http://kcl.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=581124 30 Wright A. The British political process: An introduction. London: : Routledge 2000. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kcl/detail.action?docID=170009 31 Kingdom J. Government and politics in Britain. Cambridge: : Polity 1991. 32 Gordon R. Repairing British politics: a blueprint for constitutional change. Oxford: : Hart 2010. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=1157017&site=ehost- live 33 Institute for Public Policy Research. A written constitution for the United Kingdom. London: : Mansell 1993. 34 Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust, Joseph Rowntree Reform Trust. Power to the people: the report of power : an independent inquiry into Britain’s democracy. [Great Britain]: : The Power Inquiry 2006. 35 Hazell, Robert P. Constitutional Futures Revisited: Britain’s Constitution to 2020. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2008. http://kcl.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=455287 36 5/58 09/27/21 6FFLK015: Advanced Constitutional Law | King's College London Nevil Johnson. Reshaping the British Constitution. Palgrave Macmillan 37 Barnett HA. Britain unwrapped: Government and constitution explained. [London]: : Penguin Books 2002. 38 Blackburn R, Plant R. Constitutional reform: the Labour government’s constitutional reform agenda. London: : Longman 1999. 39 Aharon Barak. The judge in a democracy. Princeton, N.J: : Princeton University Press 2006. 40 Blackburn R. Towards a constitutional Bill of Rights for the United Kingdom: commentary and documents. London: : Pinter 1999. 41 Bogdanor V. Power and the people: a guide to constitutional reform. London: : Gollancz 1997. 42 Independent Commission on the Voting System. The report of the Independent Commission on the Voting System. London: : Stationery Office 1998. 43 Rogers R, Walters RH. How parliament works. Seventh edition. London, [England]: : Routledge 2015. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kcl/detail.action?docID=2001979 6/58 09/27/21 6FFLK015: Advanced Constitutional Law | King's College London 44 Oliver D, Drewry G. The law and Parliament. London: : Butterworths 1998. 45 Blackburn R. Constitutional studies: contemporary issues and controversies. London: : Mansell 1992. 46 Blackburn R. Rights of citizenship. London: : Mansell 1993. 47 The Crown and the Royal Family. In: Halsbury’s laws of England. London: : Butterworths 2008. 48 Blackburn R. The meeting of Parliament: a study of the law and practice relating to the frequency and duration of the United Kingdom Parliament. Aldershot: : Dartmouth 1990. 49 Blackburn R, Polakiewicz J. Fundamental rights in Europe: The European Convention on Human Rights and its member states, 1950-2000. [Oxford]: : Oxford University Press 2001. 50 Shell D. The House of Lords. Deddington: : Philip Allan 1988. 51 7/58 09/27/21 6FFLK015: Advanced Constitutional Law | King's College London Foley M. The politics of the British constitution. Manchester: : Manchester University Press 1999. 52 Hennessy P. The hidden wiring: unearthing the British constitution. London: : Gollancz 1995. 53 Hennessy P. The Prime Minister: The office and its holders since 1945. New [ed.]. [London]: : Penguin Books 2001. 54 Minogue KR, Centre for Policy Studies. The constitutional mania. London: : Centre for Policy Studies 1993. 55 Jennings I. The British constitution. Cambridge: : University Press 1941. 56 Jennings I. Cabinet government. 3rd ed. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1959. 57 Jennings I. Parliament. 2nd ed. reprinted. London: : Cambridge University Press 1969. 58 Jennings I. The law and the constitution. 5th ed. London: : Hodder and Stoughton 1959. 8/58 09/27/21 6FFLK015: Advanced Constitutional Law | King's College London 59 Dicey AV. Introduction to the study of the law of the constitution. Indianapolis: : Liberty Fund 1982. 60 Laski HJ. Parliamentary government in England: a commentary. London: : Allen & Unwin 1938. 61 Brazier R. Constitutional texts: materials on government and the constitution. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 1990. 62 Crick B. The reform of Parliament. 2nd ed. Weidenfeld and Nicolson 1968. 63 O. Hood Phillips. Reform of the constitution. London: : Chatto & Windus 1970. 64 Newton of Braintree AH, Hansard Society Commission on Parliamentary Scrutiny, Nuffield Foundation. The challenge for Parliament: Making government accountable. [London]: : Vacher Dod 2001. 65 Hailsham of St. Marylebone QH. Elective dictatorship. London: : British Broadcasting Corporation 1976. 66 Hailsham of St. Marylebone QH. The dilemma of democracy: diagnosis and prescription. London: : Collins 1978. 9/58 09/27/21 6FFLK015: Advanced Constitutional Law | King's College London 67 Hailsham of St. Marylebone QH. On the constitution. London: : HarperCollins 1992. 68 J. A. G. Griffith. The Political Constitution. The Modern Law Review 1979;42:1–21. 69 Benn T, Mullin C. Arguments for democracy. London: : Cape 1981. 70 Benn T, Hood A, Winstone R. Common sense: a new constitution for Britain. London: : Hutchinson 1993. 71 May TE, Jack M, Hutton M, et al. Erskine May’s treatise on the law, privileges, proceedings, and usage of Parliament. 24th ed. London: : LexisNexis 2011. 72 Baldwin N. Parliament in the 21st century. London: : Politico’s 2005. 73 Alex Brazier. New Politics, New Parliament? Hansard Society 74 Adonis A. Parliament today. 2nd ed. Manchester: : Manchester University Press 1993. 10/58 09/27/21 6FFLK015: Advanced Constitutional
Recommended publications
  • Report of the Select Committee on the Reduction of Standing Committees of Tynwald

    Report of the Select Committee on the Reduction of Standing Committees of Tynwald

    REPORT OF THE SELECT COMMITTEE ON THE REDUCTION OF STANDING COMMITTEES OF TYNWALD t i I. • REPORT OF THE SELECT COMMITTEE ON THE REDUCTION OF STANDING COMMITTEES OF TYNWALD To the Honourable Noel Q Cringle, President of Tynwald, and the Honourable Members of the Council and Keys in Tynwald assembled PART 1 INTRODUCTION 1. Background At the sitting of Tynwald Court on 21st May 2002 it was resolved that a Select Committee of five members be established to - "investigate and report by no later than July 2003 on the feasibility of reducing the number of Standing Committees of Tynwald along with any recommendations as to the responsibilities and membership and any proposals for change." 2. Mr Karran, Mr Lowey, Mr Quayle, Mr Quine and Mr Speaker were elected. At 4, the first meeting Mr Speaker was unanimously elected as Chairman. 3. The Committee has held four meetings. C/RSC/02/plb PART 2 STRATEGY 2.1 The Committees of Tynwald that would be examined were determined as: Committee on Constitutional Matters; Committee on the Declaration of Members' Interests, Ecclesiastical Committee; Committee on Economic Initiatives; Joint Committee on the Emoluments of Certain Public Servants; Committee on Expenditure and Public Accounts; Tynwald Ceremony Arrangements Committee; Tynwald Honours Committee; Tynwald Management Committee; Tynwald Members' Pension Scheme Management Committee; and Tynwald Standing Orders Committee of Tynwald. A brief summary of the membership and terms of reference of each standing committee is attached as Appendix 1. 2 C/RSC/02/plb 2.2 In order to facilitate its investigation your Committee also decided that - (a) Comparative information on committee structures in adjacent parliaments should be obtained.
  • New Peers Created Have Fallen from 244 Under David Cameron’S Six Years As Prime Minister to Only 37 to Date Under Theresa May

    New Peers Created Have Fallen from 244 Under David Cameron’S Six Years As Prime Minister to Only 37 to Date Under Theresa May

    \ For more information on DeHavilland and how we can help with political monitoring, custom research and consultancy, contact: +44 (0)20 3033 3870 [email protected] Information Services Ltd 2018 0 www.dehavilland.co.uk INTRODUCTION & ANALYSIS ............................................................................................................. 2 CONSERVATIVES ........................................................................................................................................ 4 Diana Barran MBE .......................................................................................................................................................... 4 The Rt. Hon. Sir Edward Garnier QC ........................................................................................................................... 5 The Rt. Hon. Sir Alan Haselhurst.................................................................................................................................. 7 The Rt. Hon. Peter Lilley ................................................................................................................................................ 8 Catherine Meyer CBE ................................................................................................................................................... 10 The Rt. Hon. Sir Eric Pickles ........................................................................................................................................ 11 The Rt. Hon. Sir John
  • Queen Elizabeth II

    Queen Elizabeth II

    16 May 2017 Queen Elizabeth II PROFESSOR VERNON BOGDANOR FBA CBE Today’s lecture is on the Queen. I gave a lecture on the Queen last year to commemorate her 90th birthday, and of course, I want to avoid repeating anything I said in that lecture, which is naturally available on the Gresham College website, so what I want to discuss today is the constitutional role of the Queen and, more generally, the role of constitutional monarchy in the 21st Century, but I shall also discuss the constitutional role of the Prince of Wales, which is I think widely misunderstood. But above all, I shall discuss the changes, which I think are very considerable in the monarchy since 1952 when the Queen came to the throne. But let me begin with a confession: this has been the most difficult lecture of the series to prepare, and the reason is that, inevitably, we know far less about the Queen than about her predecessors. There are official biographies of all the past monarchs whom I have discussed in this series, except for Queen Victoria, and that was because Edward VII, for some reason, would not allow an official biography. We also have historical works about past monarchs, based on material in the Royal Archives and in the National Archives. What we have learnt about past monarchs does, in many cases, alter the view that people had of them at the time, especially perhaps in the case of Queen Victoria. Bagehot, writing in the 1860s, thought her a perfect constitutional monarch, but later research has shown that she was very far from that.
  • Union with Scotland Act 1706

    Union with Scotland Act 1706

    Changes to legislation: There are currently no known outstanding effects for the Union with Scotland Act 1706. (See end of Document for details) Union with Scotland Act 1706 1706 CHAPTER 11 6 Ann X1 An Act for an Union of the Two Kingdoms of England and Scotland Most gracious Sovereign Recital of Articles of Union, dated 22d July, 5 Ann.; and of an Act of Parliament passed in Scotland, 16th January, 5 Ann. Whereas Articles of Union were agreed on the Twenty Second day of July in the Fifth year of Your Majesties reign by the Commissioners nominated on behalf of the Kingdom of England under Your Majesties Great Seal of England bearing date at Westminster the Tenth day of April then last past in pursuance of an Act of Parliament made in England in the Third year of Your Majesties reign and the Commissioners nominated on the behalf of the Kingdom of Scotland under Your Majesties Great Seal of Scotland bearing date the Twenty Seventh day of February in the Fourth year of Your Majesties Reign in pursuance of the Fourth Act of the Third Session of the present Parliament of Scotland to treat of and concerning an Union of the said Kingdoms And Whereas an Act hath passed in the Parliament of Scotland at Edinburgh the Sixteenth day of January in the Fifth year of Your Majesties reign wherein ’tis mentioned that the Estates of Parliament considering the said Articles of Union of the two Kingdoms had agreed to and approved of the said Articles of Union with some Additions and Explanations And that Your Majesty with Advice and Consent of the Estates
  • Transcript 5

    Transcript 5

    Transcript House of Lords: an audio collection What specifically happened to the Lords over the course of the 20th century? Interviewer: What specifically happened to the Lords over the course of the 20th century? Richard Heffernan: Well, the Lords became subordinate to the Commons, largely through a series of incremental developments and statute laws. There was a huge fight between the elected Common – the partially elected Commons, because of course women didn't get the vote until 1918 in the UK, and they didn't get the vote on equal basis at the age of 21 with men until the general election of 1929. But there was a big fight between the liberal majority in Parliament in the House of Commons and a conservative majority in the House of Lords over a series of measures, particularly culminating in a fight over the 1909 budget, the People's Budget, Lloyd George's budget, which did many things, but two things: it raised the income tax in order to provide some degree of social welfare for people, and to rearm in the face of what was perceived to be a gathering threat from a resurgent Germany. The Lords majority, led by the conservative majority, did not like that and so threw out the budget, and then there was a general election held in 1910 which saw the re-election, on a smaller majority, of the liberal government, which then insisted that the Lords pass its budget. A second election was then held on the question of Lords reform. The liberals were again successful, and the Parliament Act of 1911 established the supremacy of the House of Commons for all time by restricting the power of the House of Lords.
  • The Strange Revival of Bicameralism

    The Strange Revival of Bicameralism

    The Strange Revival of Bicameralism Coakley, J. (2014). The Strange Revival of Bicameralism. Journal of Legislative Studies, 20(4), 542-572. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2014.926168 Published in: Journal of Legislative Studies Queen's University Belfast - Research Portal: Link to publication record in Queen's University Belfast Research Portal Publisher rights © 2014 Taylor & Francis. This work is made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Queen's University Belfast Research Portal is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The Research Portal is Queen's institutional repository that provides access to Queen's research output. Every effort has been made to ensure that content in the Research Portal does not infringe any person's rights, or applicable UK laws. If you discover content in the Research Portal that you believe breaches copyright or violates any law, please contact [email protected]. Download date:01. Oct. 2021 Published in Journal of Legislative Studies , 20 (4) 2014, pp. 542-572; doi: 10.1080/13572334.2014.926168 THE STRANGE REVIVAL OF BICAMERALISM John Coakley School of Politics and International Relations University College Dublin School of Politics, International Studies and Philosophy Queen’s University Belfast [email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT The turn of the twenty-first century witnessed a surprising reversal of the long-observed trend towards the disappearance of second chambers in unitary states, with 25 countries— all but one of them unitary—adopting the bicameral system.
  • Time for Reflection

    Time for Reflection

    All-Party Parliamentary Humanist Group TIME FOR REFLECTION A REPORT OF THE ALL-PARTY PARLIAMENTARY HUMANIST GROUP ON RELIGION OR BELIEF IN THE UK PARLIAMENT The All-Party Parliamentary Humanist Group acts to bring together non-religious MPs and peers to discuss matters of shared interests. More details of the group can be found at https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm/cmallparty/190508/humanist.htm. This report was written by Cordelia Tucker O’Sullivan with assistance from Richy Thompson and David Pollock, both of Humanists UK. Layout and design by Laura Reid. This is not an official publication of the House of Commons or the House of Lords. It has not been approved by either House or its committees. All-Party Groups are informal groups of Members of both Houses with a common interest in particular issues. The views expressed in this report are those of the Group. © All-Party Parliamentary Humanist Group, 2019-20. TIME FOR REFLECTION CONTENTS FOREWORD 4 INTRODUCTION 6 Recommendations 7 THE CHAPLAIN TO THE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF COMMONS 8 BISHOPS IN THE HOUSE OF LORDS 10 Cost of the Lords Spiritual 12 Retired Lords Spiritual 12 Other religious leaders in the Lords 12 Influence of the bishops on the outcome of votes 13 Arguments made for retaining the Lords Spiritual 14 Arguments against retaining the Lords Spiritual 15 House of Lords reform proposals 15 PRAYERS IN PARLIAMENT 18 PARLIAMENT’S ROLE IN GOVERNING THE CHURCH OF ENGLAND 20 Parliamentary oversight of the Church Commissioners 21 ANNEX 1: FORMER LORDS SPIRITUAL IN THE HOUSE OF LORDS 22 ANNEX 2: THE INFLUENCE OF LORDS SPIRITUAL ON THE OUTCOME OF VOTES IN THE HOUSE OF LORDS 24 Votes decided by the Lords Spiritual 24 Votes decided by current and former bishops 28 3 All-Party Parliamentary Humanist Group FOREWORD The UK is more diverse than ever before.
  • Evidence from Professor Vernon Bogdanor 7 December 2015

    Evidence from Professor Vernon Bogdanor 7 December 2015

    Evidence from Professor Vernon Bogdanor 7 December 2015 BK: We’ll kick off, if we can. Thank you very much for coming to present to us this afternoon. I’d like to start with quite an open question. You wrote this very excellent report before the election, which set out the crisis in the constitution. If you were taking stock now, post the election, what would you say? Would you feel more or less optimistic? VB: I have taken stock and there is now a second edition of my pamphlet, `The Crisis of the Constitution’, published in February 2016. I am more optimistic to the extent that there is now a broad general policy of devolution and decentralisation in England which I welcome. But there are some fundamental problems that have not been fully confronted. I still hold very strongly to the view that to confront them, we need, if not a constitution, at least a charter, laying out what policy areas are suitable for devolution and decentralisation, and which need to remain at the centre. That is crucial not just for devolution in England, but also for devolution in the non-English parts of the United Kingdom. We do need a clear criterion of what is suitable for devolution and decentralisation and what is not. BK: One of the phrases you use in this document is that ‘asymmetry is the price we pay for the Union’ which is a very striking phrase. VB: There has been a lot of loose talk about a federal system for Britain. Federalism could take two alternative forms, first a Parliament in England, or second regional authorities in England with roughly similar powers to those of the Scottish Parliament or Welsh Assembly.
  • Reinventing Britain : Constitutional Change Under New Labour / Edited by Andrew Mcdonald

    Reinventing Britain : Constitutional Change Under New Labour / Edited by Andrew Mcdonald

    © 2007 UC Regents Buy this book The Global,Area, and International Archive (GAIA) is an initiative of International and Area Studies, University of California, Berkeley,in partnership with the University of California Press, the California Digital Library,and international research programs across the UC system. GAIA volumes, which are published in both print and open- access digital editions, represent the best traditions of regional studies, reconfigured through fresh global, transnational, and thematic perspectives. University of California Press, one of the most distinguished university presses in the United States, enriches lives around the world by advancing scholarship in the humanities, social sciences, and natural sciences. Its activities are supported by the UC Press Foundation and by philanthropic contributions from individuals and institutions. For more information, visit www.ucpress.edu. University of California Press Berkeley and Los Angeles, California University of California Press, Ltd. London, England First published in Great Britain in 2007 by Politico’s Publishing, an imprint of Methuen Publishing Ltd. © 2007 by Andrew McDonald Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Reinventing Britain : constitutional change under New Labour / edited by Andrew McDonald.. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. isbn-13: 978-0-520-09862-6 (pbk. : alk. paper) 1. Constitutional law—Great Britain. 2. Law reform—Great Britain. 3. Labour Party (Great Britain). 4. Great Britain—Politics and government—1997– I. McDonald,Andrew, 1962– KD3989.R45 2007 342.41Ј03—dc22 2007029743 Manufactured in the United States of America 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 09 08 07 10987654321 The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of ansi/niso z39.48‒1992 (r 1997) (Permanence of Paper).
  • House of Lords Library Note: the Life Peerages Act 1958

    House of Lords Library Note: the Life Peerages Act 1958

    The Life Peerages Act 1958 This year sees the 50th anniversary of the passing of the Life Peerages Act 1958 on 30 April. The Act for the first time enabled life peerages, with a seat and vote in the House of Lords, to be granted for other than judicial purposes, and to both men and women. This Library Note describes the historical background to the Act and looks at its passage through both Houses of Parliament. It also considers the discussions in relation to the inclusion of women life peers in the House of Lords. Glenn Dymond 21st April 2008 LLN 2008/011 House of Lords Library Notes are compiled for the benefit of Members of Parliament and their personal staff. Authors are available to discuss the contents of the Notes with the Members and their staff but cannot advise members of the general public. Any comments on Library Notes should be sent to the Head of Research Services, House of Lords Library, London SW1A 0PW or emailed to [email protected]. Table of Contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................... 1 2. Life peerages – an historical overview .......................................................................... 2 2.1 Hereditary nature of peerage................................................................................... 2 2.2 Women not summoned to Parliament ..................................................................... 2 2.3 Early life peerages..................................................................................................
  • Electoral System Change in Europe Since 1945

    Electoral System Change in Europe Since 1945

    Electoral reform in Europe since 1945 Article Supplemental Material online supplement Renwick, A. (2011) Electoral reform in Europe since 1945. West European Politics, 34 (3). pp. 456-477. ISSN 1743-9655 doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2011.555975 Available at http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/21318/ It is advisable to refer to the publisher’s version if you intend to cite from the work. See Guidance on citing . Published version at: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01402382.2011.555975 To link to this article DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2011.555975 Publisher: Routledge All outputs in CentAUR are protected by Intellectual Property Rights law, including copyright law. Copyright and IPR is retained by the creators or other copyright holders. Terms and conditions for use of this material are defined in the End User Agreement . www.reading.ac.uk/centaur CentAUR Central Archive at the University of Reading Reading’s research outputs online Electoral System Change in Europe since 1945 West European Politics 34:?, ??–?? Online Supplement: Details of Categorizations Used in and Sources Used For Tables This supplement provides additional details regarding the criteria for including and classifying cases of electoral system change and lists the principal sources used for each country. Contents Abbreviations 2 Criteria Used to Identify and Classify Cases 3 Sources Used to Identify and Classify Cases 16 1 Abbreviations MMM mixed-member majoritarian MMP mixed-member proportional PR proportional representation SMP single-member plurality STV single transferable vote 2 Criteria Used to Identify and Categorize Cases Countries Included The sample used for this article includes European countries since 1945.
  • The House of Lords: Conventions and Brexit

    The House of Lords: Conventions and Brexit

    REPORT The House of Lords: Conventions and Brexit By Richard Reid First published in Great Britain in 2017 by The Constitution Society Top Floor, 61 Petty France London, SW1H 9EU www.consoc.org.uk © The Constitution Society ISBN: 978-1-9998886-1-9 All rights reserved. Without limiting the rights under copyright reserved above, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise), without the prior written permission of both the copyright owner and the publisher of this book. 2 The House of Lords: Conventions and Brexit Acknowledgements The author thanks the Constitution Society for commissioning the paper and its President, Sir Malcolm Jack, for his interest in the project. The author would also like to thank the ANU Centre for European Studies for the Europa Visiting Fellowship which supported this research, and Nicolas Besly for his comments on earlier drafts. All views expressed are those of the author alone. The House of Lords: Conventions and Brexit 3 Contents Acknowledgements 3 About the Author 5 Summary 6 PART 1 Paragraphs 1-9 Conventions PART 2 Paragraphs 10-16 The Salisbury-Addison Convention PART 3 Paragraphs 17-47 The House of Lords and Brexit PART 4 Paragraphs 48-59 Brexit: Possible Scenarios Conclusion Paragraphs 60-63 4 The House of Lords: Conventions and Brexit About the Author Richard Reid is Europa Visiting Fellow at the Australian National University Centre for European Studies, and completed his PhD on reform of the House of Lords in 2016.