EUBAM Libya Strategic Review 2021

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

EUBAM Libya Strategic Review 2021 EEAS(2021) 174 Limited EUROPEAN EXTERNAL ACTION SERVICE Integrated Approach for Security and Peace Directorate (ISP) Working document of the European External Action Service of 19/02/2021 EEAS Reference EEAS(2021) 174 Limited Distribution marking To [and/or GSC Political and Security Committee (PSC) distribution acronyms] Title / Subject EUBAM Libya Strategic Review 2021 [Ref. prev. doc.] ST 7248/20 EEAS(2021) 174 ISP.3 1 Limited EEAS(2021) 174 Limited Strategic Review of Operation EUBAM Libya – 2021 REFERENCES: A. COUNCIL DECISION (CFSP) 2018/2009 of 17 December 2018 amending and extending Decision 2013/233/CFSP on the European Union Integrated Border Management Assistance Mission in Libya (EUBAM Libya); B. Strategic Review on EUBAM Libya – EEAS (2020) 397 07 April 2020; C. Strategic Review on EUNAVFORMED IRINI – EEAS (2020) 13878 10 December 2020; D. EUBAM Libya Six-Monthly Report (2020) 10382 01 September 2020 E. UNSC Resolution 2510 (2020) of 12 February 2020 on the Berlin Conference; F. Operational Plan for the CSDP Mission EUBAM Libya EEAS (2020) 15023 30 November 2018; G. Conclusions of the Council and of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States, meeting within the Council, on the establishment of a Civilian CSDP Compact 14305/18 19 November 2018; H. Suggestions for crisis management procedures for CSDP crisis management operations of 18 June 2013, ST 7660/2/13. EEAS(2021) 174 ISP.3 2 Limited EEAS(2021) 174 Limited I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. The outbreak of violence in Libya in April 2019 has severely affected institutional reunification and stability in Libya. However, the UN SRSG's three-step plan and the subsequent international conference in Berlin held on 19 January 2020 supports paving the way for intra-Libyan talks and conflict resolution. Elections have been announced for the 24 December 2021 and a Ceasefire Agreement was signed on 23 October, although its provisions (notably the withdrawal of all foreign fighters and the setup of a ceasefire monitoring mechanism) have not yet fully materialised. On 5th February, the 74 members of the LPDF selected a transitional unified executive authority for Libya composed of Abdul Hamid Mohammed Dbeibah as the Prime Minister and Mohammad Younes Menfi as the head of the Presidential Council. Menfi will serve with Mossa Al-Koni, and Abdullah Hussein Al-Lafi as vice-presidents in the Council. The process for the nomination and parliamentary endorsement of a new transitional government should be finalised by 19 March 2021. 2. The EU strongly supports the implementation of the Berlin process for Libya and the UN-led efforts to push for progress in the intra-Libyan talks on the political process, security and economy. As a decisive step, the EU launched EUNAVFOR MED Operation IRINI. In addition, the Council expressed the EU commitment to support the operationalisation of each of the six thematic baskets agreed at the Berlin conference. 3. The political situation and the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic has significantly affected the deployment and activities of a number of international actors throughout Libya. The security situation remains of concern in the country, and even more with regards to human rights and gender. Border management, counter-terrorism and fight against organised crime continue to show severe lacks. The current threat rating assessed as "high" in Libya, the political and security situation, as well as the current COVID 19 pandemic are likely to continue hampering the international support to the peace process in Libya. 4. International efforts to stabilise the country through the full implementation of the Berlin process are led by the UN Support Mission in Libya (UNSMIL), under the principle of national ownership. UNSMIL is mandated to provide for the coordination of international assistance, advice and assistance to the internationally-recognised Government of National Accord (GNA) to consolidate the governance, security and economic arrangements of the Libyan transition process. EEAS(2021) 174 ISP.3 3 Limited EEAS(2021) 174 Limited 5. The EU is actively engaged in support to the UN-led efforts both through CSDP (and the EULPC) and cooperation/financial support. The EU Liaison and Planning Cell provides significant support to UNSMIL and EU on security analysis. In addition, EU Member States are engaged in Libya on a bilateral basis or in support to broader actions. International actors are also involved in an increasing manner. Some international actors’ involvement include defence and military support at various degrees. 6. While there has been considerable progress made by the Mission in implementing its mandate, the security and political environment and the COVID-19 pandemic have severely affected EUBAM's efforts to fully achieve its objectives. EUBAM Libya remains, however, a credible and high profile actor amongst its Libyan counterparts and within the international community. It is deployed in Tripoli and implemented activities when many others have not been able to do so. 7. EUBAM’s support has, to date, been limited only to the (internationally recognised) GNA which has prevented EUBAM from exploring the possibilities to support other relevant Libyan non-State actors (where there is little or no GNA control or presence, including in the Eastern part and the South). The recent election of a new interim executive authority, welcomed by the international community, may address this gap in the future. However, at the time of drafting this SR, the appointment of a new government and its endorsement by the Parliament has not yet taken place and uncertainties remain on future political developments. 8. Looking at possible future scenarios for Libya, there remains a degree of uncertainty in regard to a possible ceasefire and a political process leading to the establishment of a unity Government, despite the selection of an interim executive authority on 5th February. Much will depend on the progress of the UN Action Plan and the Berlin process, but should there be a political breakthrough, good opportunities should arise for further enhancing the contribution of EUBAM Libya in the implementation of the Berlin Process. 9. This review looks to identify opportunities which could derive from improvement in the political and security conditions in Libya and progress within the framework of the Berlin process. The Mission mandate should allow appropriate flexibility and readiness in responding to emerging needs in the future. Therefore, it is recommended: - To extend EUBAM Libya's mandate for two years until 30 June 2023; EEAS(2021) 174 ISP.3 4 Limited EEAS(2021) 174 Limited - To amend EUBAM's Libya's mandate with the addition of a second strategic objective to support the UN-led efforts as a visible sign of the EU's commitment to operationally contribute to the outcomes of the Berlin process: o Strategic Objective 1 - EUBAM Libya is to assist the relevant Libyan authorities in the building of state security structures in Libya, in particular in the areas of border management, law enforcement and criminal justice, with a view to contributing to efforts to disrupt organised criminal networks involved notably in smuggling migrants, human trafficking and terrorism in Libya and the Central Mediterranean region. o Strategic Objective 2 - Within the scope of its core areas of engagement (law enforcement, border management and criminal justice) EUBAM Libya is to contribute to the UN-led efforts for the peace process in the country. As for Strategic Objective 2, the Mission may provide additional support on the basis of a dedicated strategic analysis to be conducted by the EEAS and presented to the Council for decision. - To coordinate with Operation IRINI and EULPC as appropriate and seek best ways of cooperation and mutual support, as well as with CSDP Missions and Operations in Sahel. - To coordinate as well, with the same purpose and as appropriate, with other EU actors engaged in Libya, including EU-funded projects. - To continue to implement relevant and appropriate commitments of the Civilian CSDP Compact. - To continue the dialogue with the Libyan authorities to secure the legal status of the Mission (SOMA). EEAS(2021) 174 ISP.3 5 Limited EEAS(2021) 174 Limited II. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND 10. This Strategic Review (SR) of EUBAM Libya assesses the progress of the Mission in implementing its current mandate and the relevance of its mandate in regard to the political and security situation in Libya as well as what other actors are or intend to do in the country and region. This SR also looks to identify opportunities for continued engagement in Libya and sets out recommendations for the way ahead. Finally, it provides an outline of the EU Liaison and Planning Cell (EULPC) activities and informs on its potential ways forward. 11. The SR has been conducted against the backdrop of a much-changed context, due to the progress of the Berlin Process for Libya, the evolution of the conflict dynamics, and the agreement on a country-wide ceasefire reached between the parties on 23 October 2020. 12. The current mandate of EUBAM Libya will expire on 30 June 2021. A decision by Member States on the future of the Mission needs to be taken in light of Council working group discussions on the findings of this SR and the broader political and security situation in Libya, the Central Mediterranean and the surrounding region. 13. The last EUBAM Strategic Review was presented to the Member States on 7 April 2020, but was not discussed in substance: PSC took note of the SR and a one-year “technical” extension was granted, with an “unchanged mandate”. This SR is, therefore, based on the EUBAM mandate adopted by the Council in June 2018, also taking into consideration the main findings of the last SR distributed to Member States in April 2020. 14. The SR has been conducted in compliance with the "Suggestions for crisis management procedures for CSDP crisis management operations - June 2013" and under the responsibility of the High Representative (HR).
Recommended publications
  • A Strategy for Success in Libya
    A Strategy for Success in Libya Emily Estelle NOVEMBER 2017 A Strategy for Success in Libya Emily Estelle NOVEMBER 2017 AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE © 2017 by the American Enterprise Institute. All rights reserved. The American Enterprise Institute (AEI) is a nonpartisan, nonprofit, 501(c)(3) educational organization and does not take institutional positions on any issues. The views expressed here are those of the author(s). Contents Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................1 Why the US Must Act in Libya Now ............................................................................................................................1 Wrong Problem, Wrong Strategy ............................................................................................................................... 2 What to Do ........................................................................................................................................................................ 2 Reframing US Policy in Libya .................................................................................................. 5 America’s Opportunity in Libya ................................................................................................................................. 6 The US Approach in Libya ............................................................................................................................................ 6 The Current Situation
    [Show full text]
  • Export Agreement Coding (PDF)
    Peace Agreement Access Tool PA-X www.peaceagreements.org Country/entity Libya Region Middle East and North Africa Agreement name Palermo Conference for and with Libya, Conclusions Date 13/11/2018 Agreement status Multiparty signed/agreed Interim arrangement No Agreement/conflict level Interstate/intrastate conflict(s) ( Libyan Conflicts (1969 - 1994) (2011 - ) ) Stage Pre-negotiation/process (Principles) Conflict nature Government Peace process 70: Libyan peace process Parties Declaration without signatories, but document states itself to be one of Libya and International partners', and lists partners as 'Participants included a broad Libyan presence,with delegations from PC/GNA, HOR, HSC andLNA. Countries invited included representatives of Algeria, Austria, Canada, Chad, China, Czech Republic,Egypt, Ethiopia, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Jordan, Malta, Morocco, the Netherlands, Niger, Poland, Qatar, Republic of Congo, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Spain, Sudan, Sweden, Swiss Confederation, Tunisia,Turkey, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom, the United States of America, the African Union, the European Union, the League of Arab States,the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund, and the United Nations. Third parties UN Special Representative of the Secretary General Ghassan Salamé stated to be present Description An agreement in the form of conference conclusions. The conference was an attempt to implement a UN Stabilisation plan, to agree on the road map for stabilization, unified institutions, and clear electoral legislation as preliminary conditions for any election to be held. The conference was intended to pave the way for a national conference in January 2019. Agreement document LY_181113_Palermo_Conference_Conclusions.pdf [] Main category Page 3, Participants, ... -‐ Urged Libyan representatives to support the principle of full inclusivity, including women participation, for the National Conference, without vetoes; Women, girls and gender Participation Other Page 3, Participants, ..
    [Show full text]
  • Oslo Forum, Oslo
    The End of the Big Peace? Opportunities for mediation Authored by Christina Buchhold, Jonathan Harlander, Sabrina Quamber and Øyvind Ege reportMeeting THE OSLO FORUM Improving the mediation of armed conflict A global series of mediation retreats Where politics meets practice The Oslo Forum is widely acknowledged as the leading interna- Participation is by invitation only. Sessions take the form of tional network of conflict mediation practitioners. Co-hosted by closed-door discussions, and adhere to the Chatham House Rule the Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue (HD) and the Norwegian of non-attribution. Sessions are designed to stimulate informed Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Oslo Forum regularly convenes exchanges with provocative inputs from a range of different speak- conflict mediators, high-level decision-makers and key peace ers, including conflict party representatives, war correspondents, process actors in a series of informal and discreet retreats. outstanding analysts, thinkers and experts on specific issues. The Oslo Forum features an annual global event in Oslo and is Participants have included Jimmy Carter, former President of the complemented by regional retreats in Africa and Asia. The aim United States; Federica Mogherini, High Representative of the is to improve the practice of conflict mediation through facili- European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy; Juan tating open exchange and reflection across institutional and Manuel Santos, former President of Colombia; António Guterres, conceptual divides, providing informal networking opportunities Secretary-General of the United Nations; Kofi Annan, former that encourage co-ordination and co-operation when needed, and Secretary-General of the United Nations; Fatou Bensouda, Prosecu- allowing space for conflict parties to advance their negotiations.
    [Show full text]
  • A ROADMAP to SUSTAINABLE PEACE in LIBYA: a Feminist Approach Towards Achieving Peace and Security in the Face of Patriarchy, Militarism, and Fundamentalism
    SIDE EVENT TO THE 41ST SESSION OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL A ROADMAP TO SUSTAINABLE PEACE IN LIBYA: A Feminist Approach towards Achieving Peace and Security in the Face of Patriarchy, Militarism, and Fundamentalism DATE VENUE TIME 28 June 2019 Palais des Nations, 14.00 – 15.00 Geneva, Room XXI Increased militarism, fundamentalism, and patriarchal structures are all factors excluding Libyan women from the local and international PANELISTS: political scenes on Libya. In fact, these three factors are shaping the way the Libyan peace process have been orchestrated the past few Dr. Rida Altubuly, President, Together We Build It (TWBI), Libya years and are obstructing peace to become true. Rawan Khalfallah, Libyan Activist, Discussions during the side event will critically address Libyan Together We Build It (TWBI), Libya women’s exclusion from the local and international political scenes Zubaydah Albarouni, Libyan Activist, on Libya, and the impact of this exclusion on the roadmap to peace; Together We Build It (TWBI), Libya the resilience of Libyan civil society and women-led initiatives on the grassroots level, the threats they are facing, their significant MODERATOR: contribution to limiting the intensification of violence, and ways for Maria Butler, Director of Global the international community to support them. It will also put forward Programmes, Women’s International feminist alternatives towards achieving sustainable peace in Libya League for Peace and Freedom as well as the role of the international community, particularly the CLOSING REMARKS: Human Rights Council, donors and influential States, in promoting the meaningful participation of Libyan women and civil society in the Christine Loew, Director of the Liaison peace process.
    [Show full text]
  • From One Libya to Another: the Unexpected Place of Law in Approaching Migration Delphine Perrin
    From one Libya to Another: The Unexpected Place of Law in Approaching Migration Delphine Perrin To cite this version: Delphine Perrin. From one Libya to Another: The Unexpected Place of Law in Approaching Migration. Afriche e Orienti, Associazione Culturale Afriche e Orienti, 2019, Libya in transition : human mobility international conflict and state building, 10.23810/1345.PERRIN. hal-02443550 HAL Id: hal-02443550 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02443550 Submitted on 7 Feb 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Pubblicazione quadrimestrale afriche numero 3 / 2018 www.comune.bologna.it/iperbole/africheorientie orienti rivista di studi ai confini tra africa mediterraneo e medio oriente anno XX numero 3 / 2018 Libya in Transition: Human Mobility, International Conflict and State Building Edited by Antonio M. Morone DOSSIER From one Libya to Another: The Unexpected Place of Law in Approaching Migration Delphine Perrin Abstract: Migration was one of Qaddafi’s key diplomatic instruments, and for Libyan stakeholders today it remains a bargaining chip. While Libya in Qaddafi’s era was considered ‘rogue’ and the new Libya is seen as a place without rule, the law has been used to orientate 76 migrations, to a greater degree than in other countries of the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Peace and Security Council Report No
    ISSUE 111 | MARCH 2019 Peace & Security Council Report Can the AU–UN efforts in Libya pave the way for elections in 2019? Streamlining the AU’s rapid response capabilities Lessons from AU election observation in Nigeria and Senegal Restructuring Africa’s partnerships easier said than done PSC Interview: ‘Outsiders should refrain from meddling in Algeria’ Can the AU–UN efforts in Libya pave the way for elections in 2019? In recognition of the dire situation in Libya, AU leaders discussed the situation in the country at the recent 32nd AU summit in Addis Ababa. According to estimates by the United Nations High Commission for Refugees, there are 170 490 internally displaced people in Libya. The humanitarian situation remains critical for both citizens and, particularly, migrants in the country. The AU summit requested, among others, that the AU Commission ‘take all necessary measures’, in collaboration with the United Nations (UN), to organise an international conference on reconciliation in Libya in July 2019. It also asked the AU Commission to help with the preparations for presidential and legislative elections planned for October 2019. Doubt remains, however, about the viability of this deadline. Following the summit, AU Commissioner for Peace and Security Smail Chergui met with Libya’s Prime Minister Fayez Mustafa al-Sarraj, UN Under- Secretary-General Rosemary DiCarlo and UN Special Representative and head of the UN Mission in Libya (UNSMIL) Ghassan Salamé to discuss ways to support Libyan parties to unlock the status quo. According to sources, in all these endeavours the importance of inclusive reconciliation has been central to the AU’s message.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Critical Period for Libya Requires Urgent Attention from Germany And
    Critical period for Libya requires urgent attention from Germany and Europe Policy Recommendations May 2021 Building on the 23 October 2020 ceasefire declaration and United Nations-led consultations in the framework of the Libyan Political Dialogue Forum (LPDF), the Libyan peace process eventually led to the establishment of a new interim government on 10 March 2021, tasked with the organisation of parliamentary and presidential elections on 24 December 2021. Following years of conflict, national fragmentation, destruction of civilian infrastructure, and deterioration of economic and social rights including access to water, health and electricity, this latest attempt at peace appears to enjoy a stronger national consensus compared to the 2015 Skhirat agreement, and visible support at the international level. However, the situation remains fragile; Germany and other European actors must prioritise addressing the lack of accountability and rule of law in Libya, to ensure that basic conditions are met for the organisation of free and fair elections and to prevent a resumption of the conflict or a de facto partition of the country. In the pursuit of these objectives, a common and cohesive European strategy on Libya would be more effective; European states, including Germany, should work toward ensuring the EU is able to unite behind these goals. Until consensus can be reached, leadership and initiative by willing States and institutions on the recommendations detailed at the end of this briefing will be even more crucial. The continued restrictions on fundamental public freedoms and civic space are a first major problem. In addition to physical threats from armed groups, both administrative and state security officials have continued to impede the work of civil society and restrict freedom of association, of expression and of the press through the application of unlawful executive decisions and decrees.
    [Show full text]
  • Conclusions of the Second Berlin Conference on Libya
    The Second Berlin Conference on Libya 23 June 2021 CONFERENCE CONCLUSIONS 1. Today, at the invitation of German Foreign Minister Maas and United Nations Secretary-General Guterres, High Representatives of the Governments of Algeria, China, the Democratic Republic of the Congo (AU Chair), Egypt, France, Germany, Italy, Libya, the Netherlands, Russia, Switzerland, Tunisia, Turkey, the Republic of the Congo (Chair of the High-Level Commission of the AU on Libya), the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom, the United States of America, the United Nations, the African Union, the European Union, and the League of Arab States, have gathered for the Second Berlin Conference on Libya. 2. We, the participants, reiterate and reaffirm the commitments made in the Conclusions of the Berlin Conference on Libya of 19 January 2020. 3. The situation in Libya has improved significantly since the Berlin Conference on Libya held on 19 January 2020. Hostilities have stopped. A ceasefire is in place. The oil shutdown was lifted. An inclusive, Libyan-led and Libyan-owned Political dialogue resumed among all Libyan political parties and actors, under the auspices of the United Nations. An interim executive authority was established, and the interim Government of National Unity (GNU) approved by the House of Representatives. 4. Accordingly, as Libya is now proceeding towards national elections, the Berlin Process now includes Libya as a full participant. We warmly welcome the participation of Prime Minister Dabaiba, representing the interim Government of National Unity of Libya, which has reaffirmed its commitment to the election date of 24 December 2021, in today’s conference.
    [Show full text]
  • Inside Libya Inside Libya
    REGIONAL PROGRAM POLITICAL DIALOGUE SOUTH MEDITERRANEAN INSIDE LIBYA INSIDE LIBYA March 2021 No°8 WWW.KAS.DE/POLDIMED REGIONAL PROGRAM POLITICAL DIALOGUE SOUTH MEDITERRANEAN FOREWORD The Regional Program Political Dialogue South Mediterranean (PolDiMed) of the Konrad-Ade- nauer-Stiftung (KAS) in cooperation with LIBYA DESK™ is delighted to continue our monthly reports on Libya for 2021. This format examines the most important political, economic and social developments of the previous month, which are of central importance for understanding the situation in Libya. The report is based on reliable Libyan sources and provides a summary and a contextualisation of developments in the wider Libyan context. The report is usually being published every first week of each month. While much attention has been paid to the external and geopolitical dimensions of the situa- tion in Libya, voices from within Libya are central to understanding local developments and the evolution of the Libyan conflict as well as its impact on the wider Mediterranean region. As an inclusive Libyan-led and Libyan-owned mediation with regards to the political, economic and military tracks are without alternative, these monthly reports emphasise the most important events within Libya and aim to give a better picture of what happens “Inside Libya”. INSIDE LIBYA Based on existing KAS-PolDiMed formats such as the Libya Brief and the Libya Task Force, we consider it necessary to shed light on the dynamics within Libya and to emphasise the im- portance of continuing and facilitating a national dialogue process in the spirit of the UN-led Berlin process. We hope that these monthly reports will give our readers a better picture of the dynamics of the ongoing Libyan conflict, its actors and multiple dimensions.
    [Show full text]
  • COVID-19 and Conflicts: the Health of Peace Processes During a Pandemic
    \\jciprod01\productn\H\HNR\25-2\HNR203.txt unknown Seq: 1 21-SEP-20 9:31 COVID-19 and Conflicts: The Health of Peace Processes During a Pandemic Lisa K. Dicker* & C. Danae Paterson** EDITORS’ NOTE This Article appears in print in the Spring 2020 issue of Volume 25 of the Harvard Negotiation Law Review. It reflects the information available to the authors as of the publication date, June 5, 2020. In the coming weeks and months, the au- thors will provide updates via the Harvard Negotiation Law Re- view website at https://www.hnlr.org/tag/hnlr-online-articles/. CONTENTS I. Introduction .......................................... 214 R II. The Internationalization of Peace Processes and Pre-Pandemic Ongoing Mediation Efforts ............. 216 R A. The Internationalization of Peace Processes ....... 216 R B. Pre-Pandemic Ongoing Mediation Efforts ......... 219 R III. Raising the Stakes: COVID-19’s Impact on Armed Conflicts and Conflict-Affected Areas ................. 223 R A. Armed Conflict Areas are Highly Vulnerable to COVID-19 ........................................ 224 R B. Exploitation of COVID-19 to Escalate Violence and Consolidate Power ........................... 228 R IV. Impact of COVID-19 on Selected Current Peace Negotiations.......................................... 232 R * Licensed attorney practicing in peace negotiation and post-conflict transi- tional contexts; Adjunct Professor for Bay Path University’s Master of Science in Leadership & Negotiation. Graduate of Harvard Law School, J.D. and University of Tennessee, B.A. ** Licensed attorney practicing in peace negotiations and post-conflict transi- tional contexts; Graduate of Harvard Law School, J.D., London School of Economics, M.Sc., and University of California, Los Angeles, B.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Export Agreement Coding (PDF)
    Peace Agreement Access Tool PA-X www.peaceagreements.org Country/entity Libya Region Middle East and North Africa Agreement name Joint declaration of the representatives of Touareg and Tebou tribes in 4 points supporting the Presidency Council of the Government of National Agreement which recently took office in Tripoli Date 21/04/2016 Agreement status Multiparty signed/agreed Interim arrangement No Agreement/conflict level Intrastate/local conflict ( Libyan Conflicts (1969 - 1994) (2011 - ) ) Stage Pre-negotiation/process (Other: Support Agreement) Conflict nature Inter-group Peace process 70: Libyan peace process Parties National Movement of the Touareg Youth in the South: Aboubakr Akhat Mohammed Al-Amin; High Revolutionary Council of the Tebou in the South: Mabruk Jomode Elie Getty Third parties Sant'Egidio Description Four point agreement between Tuareg and Tebu representatives announcing their support of the Government of National Accord set up by the Libyan Political Agreement. Agreement document LY_160421_Joint Declaration Tebu-Tuareg.pdf [] Local agreement properties Process type Formal structured process Explain rationale -> Link to national level; external support mechanism; culture of signing The communication between antagonistic parties and the signing of the agreement was supported by the Italian Sant'Edigio organisation. Moreover, the agreement is clearly embedded in a culture of signing (and supporting) agreements to bring an end to the violence between the tribes of this locale (Fezzan). The agreement mentions the previous document signed to promote peace in Libya: "the documents signed in Doha on the 22 November 2015 and in Rome on the 28 November 2015". Is there a documented link Yes to a national peace process? Link to national process: The agreement is clearly linked to the national process.
    [Show full text]
  • Benefits of Peace in Libya: Neighbouring Countries and Beyond VISION ESCWA, an Innovative Catalyst for a Stable, Just and Flourishing Arab Region
    Benefits of Peace in Libya: Neighbouring Countries and Beyond VISION ESCWA, an innovative catalyst for a stable, just and flourishing Arab region MISSION Committed to the 2030 Agenda, ESCWA’s passionate team produces innovative knowledge, fosters regional consensus and delivers transformational policy advice. Together, we work for a sustainable future for all. E/ESCWA/CL6.GCP/2020/2 Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia Benefits of Peace in Libya: Neighbouring Countries and Beyond UNITED NATIONS Beirut 2 © 2021 United Nations All rights reserved worldwide Photocopies and reproductions of excerpts are allowed with proper credits. All queries on rights and licenses, including subsidiary rights, should be addressed to the United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia (ESCWA), e-mail: [email protected] The findings, interpretations and conclusions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the United Nations or its officials or Member States. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Links contained in this publication are provided for the convenience of the reader and are correct at the time of issue. The United Nations takes no responsibility for the continued accuracy of that information or for the content of any external website. References have, wherever possible, been verified. Mention of commercial names and products does not imply the endorsement of the United Nations.
    [Show full text]