DOCSLIB.ORG

Fourteenth Human Rights Report of the German Government Reference Period: 1 October 2018 Until 30 September 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fourteenth Human Rights Report of the German Government Reference Period: 1 October 2018 Until 30 September 2020 Fourteenth Human Rights Report of the German Government Reference period: 1 October 2018 until 30 September 2020 1 Federal Minister for Foreign Affairs Heiko Maas meets Svetlana Tikhanovskaya, an unaffliated civil rights activist and candidate for the presidential elections in Belarus in 2020, for talks at the Federal Foreign Offce in Berlin on 7 October 2020 © photothek. Dear readers, Fate has bestowed upon her a role that she would hardly have envisaged for herself. Teacher, translator, mother – these are the words people would perhaps have used to describe Svetlana Tikhanovskaya before the events in Belarus in 2020, when they were joined by a few more: presidential candidate, opposition leader, human rights activist. The state crackdowns in Belarus in connection with the presidential elec- tions drove her to take on her husband’s candidacy after he was barred from standing for election. Following his arrest, she became one of the leading fgures of the protest movement and a voice for freedom, democracy and human rights in Belarus. Civil society in Belarus is representative of many people in the world who are taking a stand against oppression and the curtailment of their human rights. Who are showing authoritarian rulers that there are limits to their tyranny. Who are responding to power with truth. 2 The shrinkage of civil society spaces nonetheless remains a widespread and growing phenomenon. One which the Federal Government is working deter- minedly to counteract through its human rights engagement. The fact that in some places the COVID-19 pandemic is being used as an excuse for repressive measures under the pretext of maintaining public order and protecting public health is an even clearer sign of how vital this engagement is. Women are often particularly affected. They have already long been fghting for recognition and equal opportunities, and in the pandemic they are now facing even more challenges. Often they are solely responsible for caregiving, whether childcare or looking after sick or elderly family members. That not only limits their capacity to assume responsibility in civil society or political functions. It also marks a return to outdated stereotypes which were believed to have long been overcome. Yet the COVID-19 pandemic is not solely to blame. It is often a deliberate ploy. The systematic campaigning of ostensibly conservative policymakers with the goal of reversing signifcant achievements in the area of equal opportunities has become known as “pushback”. We don’t need to go very far to see the fundamental value of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights – that all human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights – being called into question. The Federal Government is working to counteract this regression. But that is not all. This year, we have celebrated the 25th anniversary of the groundbreaking World Conference on Women in Beijing as well as the 20th anniversary of the UN Security Council Resolution 1325 on Women, Peace and Security. It is high time for women to sit at the negotiating table when the future of confict-ridden societies is under discussion. The scientifcally proven statement that peace is more enduring and incorporates broader sec- tions of the population when women have a say in shaping it is now almost universally accepted. We are passionately working on this and many other human rights issues, not least in the United Nations Security Council. For we know all too well that peace and security and the protection of human rights are interdependent. During our membership we have succeeded in bringing the Human Rights Council in Geneva and the UN Security Council in New York closer together and anchoring the issue of human rights frmly on the agenda in New York. When we leave the Council at the end of 2020, the partners who succeed us will continue to promote this goal. 3 Over the past year, we have taken the opportunity offered by our parallel membership of the UN Security Council and the UN Human Rights Council and our Presidency of the EU Council to drive forward our human rights agenda in numerous areas. Our Presidency of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe from November 2020 to May 2021 will continue to provide us with a forum for this activity, as will the additional two years of membership in the UN Human Rights Council. These institutions are fanked by a close-knit network of other established instruments and mechanisms – ranging from the Offce of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and the numerous United Nations supervisory committees and mandate holders, through the OSCE’s third dimension, the human dimension, and the European Court of Human Rights, to the Charter of fundamental rights of the European Union. However, these achievements of multilateral policymaking – in the feld of human rights and beyond – are being more and more frequently called into question and the rules of multilateralism disregarded. We and our partners are often challenged by attempts to water down universal values. Yet alongside this defensive battle which we are continually fghting we can also set a pos- itive agenda of cooperation to fnd global solutions on the basis of common values. We have achieved this with the Alliance for Multilateralism. With more than 60 members, it actively works to shape multilateral policy felds, such as human rights during the conference entitled “Advocating Human Rights in the 21st Century”, which took place at the Federal Foreign Offce in December 2019. It also focuses on future-defning issues such as digital transformation and climate change and their impact on human rights. Germany’s engagement in the area of human rights is held in high regard throughout the world. This is a result of the Federal Government’s activity in this feld in cooperation with foreign partners and in other countries, but not only that. Another signifcant factor is our credibility on the global stage, as we strive to ensure that human rights are also protected at home. These efforts fnd their expression, for example, in Germany’s commitment to implementing the international community’s recommendations in the UN Human Rights Council’s Universal Periodic Review. I would like to offer my sincere thanks to all the staff of the federal ministries and subordinate authorities who work to ensure that we do not tire of continuing to improve our own human rights record. 4 In this task, we receive constructive criticism and support from nongovern- mental players in Germany and throughout the world. To them, too, I convey my gratitude and respect for this and for their engagement in the numerous felds related to human rights. In many countries, human rights defenders put themselves at great personal risk. A fact that we wish to acknowledge through the founding of the Elisabeth Selbert Initiative for persecuted hu- man rights defenders, which helps to remove committed activists from the fring line of repression so that they can continue their engagement in the medium and long term. Svetlana Tikhanovskaya is one of the people who are willing to shoulder a considerable personal burden for the sake of preserving human rights. She represents many people whose names we may never know but who likewise decide on a daily basis to stand up for human rights. I have great respect for all of them. Only together can we defend the foundation of values on which free, democratic societies are built. Only together can we respond to issues affecting the future in such a way that respect for human rights does not just remain an ambition but can become a reality for everyone. This goal is what drives the engagement of the Federal Government, which will continue to make every effort to ensure that human rights are respected throughout the world. Heiko Maas, Federal Minister for Foreign Affairs 5 Contents Preliminary remarks and guide to the report .................................... 13 Structure of the report .................................................... 14 Replies to the German Bundestag .......................................... 15 A German Government’s Action Plan for Human Rights 2021 – 2022 ............ 17 Preserving and expanding the human rights acquis .......................... 22 1. Strengthening human rights in the context of the digital transition ..... 22 2. Tackling climate action, protection of biodiversity and the environment and defence of human rights as a unifed challenge ................... 23 3. Promoting the rights to water and sanitation, health, housing and nutrition . 25 4. Strengthening human rights in the context of business and trade ...... 27 5. Championing freedom of the media and freedom of opinion .......... 28 6. Championing freedom of religion or belief ........................... 29 7. Championing gender equality . 31 8. Actively promoting the Women, Peace and Security Agenda ........... 34 9. Combating discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity . 35 10. Strengthening children’s rights ..................................... 37 11. Championing the rights of migrants, asylum seekers and refugees . 38 12. Championing the rights of minorities and indigenous peoples . 40 13. Strengthening the rights of older people ............................ 41 14. Promoting the right to education ................................... 41 Combating human rights violations ........................................ 44 15. Combating racism, antisemitism and other forms of hatred against particular groups . 44 16. Opposing the death penalty around
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Limits of Punishment Transitional Justice and Violent Extremism
    i n s t i t u t e f o r i n t e g r at e d t r a n s i t i o n s The Limits of Punishment Transitional Justice and Violent Extremism May, 2018 United Nations University – Centre for Policy Research The UNU Centre for Policy Research (UNU-CPR) is a UN-focused think tank based at UNU Centre in Tokyo. UNU-CPR’s mission is to generate policy research that informs major UN policy processes in the fields of peace and security, humanitarian affairs, and global development. i n s t i t u t e f o r i n t e g r at e d t r a n s i t i o n s Institute for Integrated Transitions IFIT’s aim is to help fragile and conflict-affected states achieve more sustainable transitions out of war or authoritarianism by serving as an independent expert resource for locally-led efforts to improve political, economic, social and security conditions. IFIT seeks to transform current practice away from fragmented interventions and toward more integrated solutions that strengthen peace, democracy and human rights in countries attempting to break cycles of conflict or repression. Cover image nigeria. 2017. Maiduguri. After being screened for association with Boko Haram and held in military custody, this child was released into a transit center and the care of the government and Unicef. © Paolo Pellegrin/Magnum Photos. This material has been supported by UK aid from the UK government; the views expressed are those of the authors.
    [Show full text]
  • Cartels" Under the New German Cartel Statute
    Vanderbilt Law Review Volume 11 Issue 2 Issue 2 - A Symposium on Trade Article 1 Regulation and Practices 3-1958 "Cartels" Under the New German Cartel Statute Heinrich Kronstein Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vlr Part of the Labor and Employment Law Commons Recommended Citation Heinrich Kronstein, "Cartels" Under the New German Cartel Statute, 11 Vanderbilt Law Review 271 (1958) Available at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vlr/vol11/iss2/1 This Symposium is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Vanderbilt Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. VANDERBILT LAW REVIEW VOLUME 11 MARcH, 1958 Nuavim 2 A SYMPOSIUM ON TRADE REGULATION AND PRACTICES "CARTELS" UNDER THE NEW GERMAN CARTEL STATUTE HEINRICH KRONSTEIN* Introduction On January 1, 1958, the "Cartel Statute" of the Federal Republic of Germany' became effective. American interests in this event are threefold: (1) During the past decade Americans have tried to convince the Western world that in an industrial, democratic society legislation of the American antitrust type is imperative. Is the German cartel statute a piece of legislation of this type? (2) The enactment of the statute brings to an end the application of Law No. 56 enacted by the American Military Government on January 28, 1947. The Paris Treaty between the Allied Powers and Germany provided that the Allied "cartel laws," though administered by the German Minister of Economics, should remain in effect until the German legislature could agree on a new statute.
    [Show full text]
  • „Härtere Gangart“
    Deutschland „Härtere Gangart“ Netzpolitik SPD-Fraktionschef Thomas Oppermann, 62, kündigt ein Gesetz gegen Fake News und Hasskommentare an und wirft Facebook vor, den demokratischen Diskurs zu untergraben. SPIEGEL: In Bocholt ist einer Ihrer Partei - nate Künast gerade wieder gezeigt hat. freunde gerade wegen Hassbotschaften ge - Das ist ein intransparentes Mysterium, gen ihn und seine Familie zurückgetreten. aber keine Rechtsschutzstelle. Ist das ein Einzelfall, oder wird das zum SPIEGEL: Melden wird nicht reichen. Renate politischen Alltag? Künast und die „Süddeutsche Zeitung“ ha - Oppermann: Ich habe Verständnis für seine ben sich vorige Woche direkt bei Facebook persönliche Entscheidung. Aber es ist eine über die sie betreffende Falschmeldung be - Niederlage für unseren freien, demokrati - schwert, und dennoch geschah drei Tage schen Diskurs, der auf Rede und Gegenre - lang nichts. Wie soll diese Rechtsschutz - de beruht. Wenn wir nicht aufpassen, wird stelle also funktionieren? er durch Lüge und Hass zerstört. Oppermann: Ich stelle mir das so vor: Wenn SPIEGEL: Anfeindungen und auch Lügen Betroffene ihre Rechtsverletzung dort sind in der Politik nichts Neues. Hat sich glaubhaft machen können und Facebook in der politischen Kommunikation wirklich nach entsprechender Prüfung die betroffe - etwas verändert? ne Meldung nicht unverzüglich binnen Oppermann: Ich sehe eine zunehmende Ver - 24 Stunden löscht, muss Facebook mit emp - rohung in der Gesellschaft insgesamt, für findlichen Bußgeldern bis zu 500 000 Euro S die es viele Gründe gibt. Aber die sozialen S rechnen. Und wenn die Betroffenen es E R P Medien tragen in besonderer Weise dazu wünschen, muss es zudem eine Richtigstel - N O I bei. Deshalb brauchen wir jetzt dringend T lung mit der gleichen Reichweite geben, C A / eine Verrechtlichung bei den Plattformen, und zwar spätestens nach 48 Stunden.
    [Show full text]
  • Collective Identity in Germany: an Assessment of National Theories
    James Madison Undergraduate Research Journal Volume 7 | Issue 1 2019-2020 Collective Identity in Germany: An Assessment of National Theories Sean Starkweather James Madison University Follow this and other works at: http://commons.lib.jmu.edu/jmurj Recommended APA 7 Citation Starkweather, S. (2020). Collective identity in Germany: An assessment of national theories. James Madison Undergraduate Research Journal, 7(1), 36-48. http://commons.lib.jmu.edu/jmurj/vol7/iss1/4 This full issue is brought to you for free and open access by JMU Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in James Madison Undergraduate Research Journal by an authorized administrator of JMU Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Collective Identity in Germany An Assessment of National Theories Sean Starkweather “Köln stellt sich quer - Tanz die AfD” by Elke Witzig is licensed under CC BY-SA-4.0 Beginning in the 18th century, the question of what makes a nation has occupied a prominent place in German politics. From the national theories of the 18th-century German Romantics, who identified cultural and ethnic factors as being the key determinants, to modern civic nationalists and postnationalists, who point to liberal civic values and institutions, the importance of collective identity and how it is oriented has remained an important topic for German scholars and policymakers. Using survey research, I assess the accuracy and relevance of these theories in contemporary German society. I find that, contrary to the optimism of modern thinkers, German collective identity remains aligned with the national theories of the Romantics, resulting in ethnic discrimination and heightened fears over the loss of culture through external ideological and ethnic sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Cartel Enforcement Global Review – September 2020 CARTEL ENFORCEMENT GLOBAL REVIEW – SEPTEMBER 2020
    Cartel Enforcement Global review – September 2020 CARTEL ENFORCEMENT GLOBAL REVIEW – SEPTEMBER 2020 Fight against cartels continues to consolidate around the world The period between 2017 and the beginning of 2020 has shown the importance of the prosecution of cartels in the context of global competition law enforcement. Competition authorities are intensifying their initiatives and concluding investigations in strategic sectors such as technology and digital services, construction, transport and mobility services, life sciences, financial services, retail and consumer goods, agriculture, food and energy. In many jurisdictions, fines imposed against participants In the EU, Directive (EU) 2019/1 (ECN+ Directive), in cartels have increased significantly or remained at a aimed at providing competition authorities of high level in the reference period. the Member States with the means to implement competition rules more effectively and to guarantee In 2019, the European Commission imposed cartel the proper functioning of the internal market, should be fines of around EUR1.4 billion. Taking into account fines implemented by Member States by February 2021. of National Competition Authorities, the total fines imposed within the EU (excluding the UK) exceeded The criminal prosecution of cartels continues to be a key EUR4 billion in 2019. factor in many jurisdictions, with particular regard to US, Canada, Australia and Ireland. New Zealand introduced In the US, the amount of fines for cartels, criminal penalties adopting a law that will come into after an important decrease in 2017, rose again force on April 8, 2021. In the UK, the authorities to USD356 million in 2019. continue to seek directors’ disqualification orders in addition to monetary penalties.
    [Show full text]
  • The German Institute for Human Rights
    Nova Acta Leopoldina NF 113, Nr. 387, 19 –24 (2011) The German Institute for Human Rights Beate Rudolf (Berlin) 1. Introduction The German Institute for Human Rights (Deutsches Institut für Menschenrechte) is the in- dependent National Human Rights Institution (NHRI) for Germany.1 It was established in March 2001 following a unanimous motion of the German federal parliament. In setting up a NHRI, Germany followed the example of many states, and heeded the recommendation made by the UN General Assembly in 1993.2 The German Institute for Human Rights is one of the few NHRIs that is organized as an institute, i.e. an institution with a focus on academic research. In its ten years of existence, the German Institute has acquired an excellent reputa- tion, both domestically and internationally. 2. National Human Rights Institutions The central purpose of National Human Rights Institutions is to help states comply with their obligations arising from international human rights law. NHRIs have been set up gradually in a number of countries since the early 1950s. The 1993 World Conference on Human Rights in Vienna brought new momentum to this development, emphasising the valuable contribution that NHRIs have made and can continue to make to promoting and protecting human rights on the national level. The UN General Assembly took up this idea; in its recommendation to the States, it incorporated the “Paris Principles”, a set of rules developed by academic experts that define NHRIs and the conditions for ensuring their independence.3 The Paris Principles provide that NHRIs must have a broad mandate to promote and pro- tect human rights.
    [Show full text]
  • A Strategy for Success in Libya
    A Strategy for Success in Libya Emily Estelle NOVEMBER 2017 A Strategy for Success in Libya Emily Estelle NOVEMBER 2017 AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE © 2017 by the American Enterprise Institute. All rights reserved. The American Enterprise Institute (AEI) is a nonpartisan, nonprofit, 501(c)(3) educational organization and does not take institutional positions on any issues. The views expressed here are those of the author(s). Contents Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................1 Why the US Must Act in Libya Now ............................................................................................................................1 Wrong Problem, Wrong Strategy ............................................................................................................................... 2 What to Do ........................................................................................................................................................................ 2 Reframing US Policy in Libya .................................................................................................. 5 America’s Opportunity in Libya ................................................................................................................................. 6 The US Approach in Libya ............................................................................................................................................ 6 The Current Situation
    [Show full text]
  • Human Rights and History a Challenge for Education
    edited by Rainer Huhle HUMAN RIGHTS AND HISTORY A CHALLENGE FOR EDUCATION edited by Rainer Huhle H UMAN The Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the Genocide Convention of 1948 were promulgated as an unequivocal R response to the crimes committed under National Socialism. Human rights thus served as a universal response to concrete IGHTS historical experiences of injustice, which remains valid to the present day. As such, the Universal Declaration and the Genocide Convention serve as a key link between human rights education and historical learning. AND This volume elucidates the debates surrounding the historical development of human rights after 1945. The authors exam- H ine a number of specific human rights, including the prohibition of discrimination, freedom of opinion, the right to asylum ISTORY and the prohibition of slavery and forced labor, to consider how different historical experiences and legal traditions shaped their formulation. Through the examples of Latin America and the former Soviet Union, they explore the connections · A CHALLENGE FOR EDUCATION between human rights movements and human rights education. Finally, they address current challenges in human rights education to elucidate the role of historical experience in education. ISBN-13: 978-3-9810631-9-6 © Foundation “Remembrance, Responsibility and Future” Stiftung “Erinnerung, Verantwortung und Zukunft” Lindenstraße 20–25 10969 Berlin Germany Tel +49 (0) 30 25 92 97- 0 Fax +49 (0) 30 25 92 -11 [email protected] www.stiftung-evz.de Editor: Rainer Huhle Translation and Revision: Patricia Szobar Coordination: Christa Meyer Proofreading: Julia Brooks and Steffi Arendsee Typesetting and Design: dakato…design. David Sernau Printing: FATA Morgana Verlag ISBN-13: 978-3-9810631-9-6 Berlin, February 2010 Photo Credits: Cover page, left: Stèphane Hessel at the conference “Rights, that make us Human Beings” in Nuremberg, November 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • Management Von Wachstum Und Globalisierung Best Practice
    Werner G. Faix Stefanie Kisgen Jens Mergenthaler Ineke Blumenthal David Rygl Ardin Djalali (Hrsg.) Management von Wachstum und Globalisierung Best Practice Band 6 SCHOOL OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS S I AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP BE STEINBEIS UNIVERSITY BERLIN Werner G. Faix | Stefanie Kisgen | Jens Mergenthaler | Ineke Blumenthal David Rygl | Ardin Djalali (Hrsg.) Management von Wachstum und Globalisierung Band 6 WERNER G. FAIX | STEFANIE KISGEN | JENS MERGENTHALER | INEKE BLUMENTHAL | DAVID RYGL | ARDIN DJALALI (HRSG.) MANAGEMENT VON WACHSTUM UND GLOBALISIERUNG BAND 6 Impressum © 2018 Steinbeis-Edition Alle Rechte der Verbreitung, auch durch Film, Funk und Fernsehen, fotomechanische Wiederga- be, Tonträger jeder Art, auszugsweisen Nachdruck oder Einspeicherung und Rückgewinnung in Datenverarbeitungsanlagen aller Art, sind vorbehalten. Werner G. Faix, Stefanie Kisgen, Jens Mergenthaler, Ineke Blumenthal, David Rygl, Ardin Djalali (Hrsg.) Management von Wachstum und Globalisierung. Band 6 1. Auflage, 2018 | Steinbeis-Edition, Stuttgart ISBN 978-3-95663-179-5 Redaktion: SIBE GmbH (www.steinbeis-sibe.de) Satz und Umschlaggestaltung: Helene Sadilek, Lena Uphoff, Katsiaryna Kaliayeva Titelbild: Santos, Brazil, Sculpture by Tomie Ohtake at Marine Outfall / idegograndi / istockphoto.com | Printed in Germany 201218-2018-06 | www.steinbeis-edition.de VORWORT DER HERAUSGEBER Die SCHOOL OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP (SIBE) ist die in- ternationale Business School der Steinbeis-Hochschule Berlin (SHB). Die SIBE steht für erfolg- reichen
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of the African Diaspora in Conflict Processes
    B ONN INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR CONVERSION • INTERNATIONALES KONVERSIONSZENTRUM BONN Agents of Peace or Agents of War? The Role of the African Diaspora in Confl ict Processes CONCEPT PAPER The Role of the African Diaspora in Conflict Processes Concept Paper (abridged English version) Of the Workshop Agents of Peace or Agents of War? The Role of the African Diaspora in Conflict Processes organized by the Ministry for Intergenerational Affairs, Family, Women and Integration of the Land of North Rhine-Westphalia in cooperation with the Bonn International Center for Conversion (BICC) INTERNATIONALES KONVERSIONSZENTRUM BONN - An der Elisabethkirche 25 BONN INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR CONVERSION (BICC) GMBH 53113 Bonn, GERMANY Phone: +49-228-911 96-0 Director: Peter J. Croll Fax: +49-228-24 12 15 Chairman of the Board: Deputy Minister Dr. Michael Stückradt E-Mail: [email protected] Register of Companies: Bonn HRB 6717 Internet: www.bicc.de Authors: Andrea Warnecke Julie Brethfeld Volker Franke BICC, April 2007 2 ANDREA WARNECKE is Junior Researcher at BICC JULIE BRETHFELD is Research Associate at BICC VOLKER FRANKE is Research Director at BICC This study was conducted by BICC with the support of the Ministry for Intergenerational Affairs, Family, Women and Integration of the Land of North Rhine-Westphalia. The authors are solely responsible for the content and for the opinions expressed therein. 3 1. INTRODUCTION 5 2. THE TERMS ‘CONFLICT PROCESS’ AND ‘DIASPORA’ 7 2.1. Conflict process 7 2.2. Diaspora 7 3. THE AFRICAN DIASPORA IN GERMANY (FOCUS NORTH RHINE-WESTPHALIA) 9 3.1. Heterogeneity and networking 10 3.2. Organizations of the African Diaspora in NRW 11 4.
    [Show full text]
  • The European, Middle Eastern and African Antitrust Review 2018
    The European, Middle Eastern and African Antitrust Review 2018 Published by Global Competition Review in association with AEQUO Law Firm FBC – Fischer Behar Chen Well Popovici Nit¸u Stoica & Asociat¸ii Baker Botts LLP Orion & Co Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP bpv Hügel Rechtsanwälte Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP Shearman & Sterling LLP Bruun & Hjejle Gide Loyrette Nouel Simonsen Vogt Wiig AS Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP Herbert Smith Freehills LLP SZA Schilling, Zutt & Anschütz Cooley Hogan Lovells Rechtsanwalts AG Covington & Burling LLP Kellerhals Carrard Vieira de Almeida & Associados DLA Piper Morgan Lewis & Bockius UK LLP Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP Dryllerakis & Associates Motieka & Audzevicˇius WilmerHale LLP ELIG, Attorneys-at-Law Norton Rose Fulbright LLP Fatur LLC Oppenländer Rechtsanwälte GCR www.globalcompetitionreview.com GLOBAL COMPETITION REVIEW Germany: Federal Cartel Office Andreas Mundt President Digitalisation and globalisation are triggering an enormous trans- important adjustments with regard to the notification of merger formation process that is challenging not only for the business com- cases that do not meet the established turnover thresholds. Cases munity but also for competition authorities, which have to deal with concerning the acquisition of companies that did not achieve high new markets, new players and new business models. The task of the turnovers in the past may also appear important in terms of their competition authorities is not changing, but the focus is. The Federal economic and competitive value for the purchaser. In those cases, Cartel Office is very well positioned to deal with this. the company’s economic potential can often be better expressed by One focus of our case work will be to keep markets open in the the purchase price.
    [Show full text]
  • Eritrean Diaspora in Germany: the Case of the Eritrean Refugees in Baden-Württemberg
    Eritrean Diaspora in Germany: The case of the Eritrean refugees in Baden-Württemberg Beatris de Oliveira Santos Dissertação de Mestrado em Migrações, Inter-Etnicidades e Transnacionalismo September, 2019 Dissertação apresentada para cumprimento dos requisites necessários à obtenção do grau de Mestre em Migrações, Inter-Etnicidades e Transnacionalismo, realizada sob orientação científica da Prof. Dr. Alexandra Magnólia Dias - NOVA/FCSH e Prof. Dr. Karin Sauer - Duale Hochschule Baden-Württemberg. This dissertation is presented as a final requirement for obtaining the Master's degree in Migration, Inter-Ethnicity and Transnationalism, under the scientific guidance of Prof. Dr. Alexandra Magnólia Dias of NOVA/FCSH, and co-orientation of Prof. Dr. Karin Sauer of DHBW. Financial Support of Baden-Württemberg Stiftung ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First of all, I would like to thank my thesis advisors Prof. Dr. Alexandra Magnólia Dias of the New University of Lisbon and Prof. Dr. Karin Sauer of the Duale Hochschule Villingen-Schwenningen. The access to both advisors was always open whenever I ran into trouble or had a question about my research or writing. I would also like to thank the experts who were involved in the validation survey for this research project: Jasmina Brancazio, Felicia Afryie, Karin Voigt, Orland Esser, Uwe Teztel, Werner Heinz, Volker Geisler, Abraham Haile, Tekeste Baire, Semainesh Gebrey, Inge Begger, Isaac, Natnael, Maximillian Begger, Alexsander Siyum, Robel, Dawit Woldu, Herr Kreuz, Hadassa and Teclu Lebasse. Without their passionate participation and inputs, this research could not have been successfully conducted. For all refugees who shared me their experiences with generosity, trust, knowledge and time, my sincerely thank you all.
    [Show full text]