DOCSLIB.ORG

Russian–Chinese Dialogue: the 2018 Model: Report No

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

S SUMMER SCHOOLS EXPERT COMMENTARIES GUEST LECTURES S SCENARIOS INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS T C TABLE NALYSIS AND FORECASTING FOREIGN POLICY ISCUSSIONS S A D S REFERENCE BOOKS T ETWORK DIALOGUE C SCIENCE WORKING PAPERS EDUCATION N PROJE REPORTS OUND ANALYSIS AND FORECASTING URITY R ATION C C OMPETITIONS E ONFERENCES C PROJE S ORGANIZATION NTERNATIONAL ACTIVITY C DU I E S S FOREIGN POLICY TALENT POOL CS EDUCATION S EPORTS OUND TABLES S POLITI R R POOL LOBAL POLITICS G ENARIO ETWORK ION C NTERNATIONAL I N CIVIL SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS S LOBAL G REFERENCE BOOKS INTERNATIONAL RELATION TALENT SS RUSSIAN ORGANIZATIONS Y Y Y DUCATION E S C INTERNATIONAL C ECURITY S S E SUMMER U C C AFFAIRS COUNCIL RELATION SCHOOLS DIALOGUE POLI OUND IETY R GUEST LECTURES ONAL I C TING SC TABLES O I TY S EPORTS IGRATION R I S OREIGN PARTNERSHIP V NTERNATIONAL I IBRARY XPERT ROADMAPS E F A I ONFEREN D IPLOMA M L S LOBAL COMMENTARIES NTERNAT G URITY MIGRATION C IVIL C I ACT ILATERAL NTHOLOGIE C SCIENCE D C REPORTS S POOL E DISCUSSIONS INTERNSHIPS I B BOOK A WEBSITE IPLOMA PARTNERSHIP INTERNSHIPS E S S Y C DIALOGUE LOBAL TALENT GLOBAL C NTHOLOGIES G A Y C D S SCIENCE POLI CONFERENCES FORE POLI Y S C SCIENCE ITE NALYSIS EFEREN S A IGRATION S IBRARY OADMAP EB ENARIO R OREIGN IPLOMA C F R L M OREIGN D S W NALY AND FORECASTING F NTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS A AND DIALOGUE I S INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS NETWORK LUB MEETINGS DIALOGUE DIPLOMACY PROJECTS S C REPORT E DIALOGUE HOOL S S T S URITY UMMER ITE C C S E C S HIP CIVIL SOCIETY EBSITE OMMENTARIE TURE W E C S C C EB S HIP IGRATION S SC PROJE EXPERT COMMENTARIES OREIGN POLICY LE S F T W M S IEN RELATION RUSSIA-IRAN PARTNERSHIP: XPERT IPLOMACY D E RUSSIAN–CHINESE EDIALOGUE:DUCATION UE G S ETWORK ARTNER NESS NALYSIS AND AN OVERVIEWNTERN AND PROSPECTS A I N IBRARY SC E S I P L FORECASTING C URITY IVIL OCIETY ONFEREN C S C THE 2018 MODEL E IEN FOR THE FUTURE S NTHOLOGIES LOBAL POLITICS C A RUSSIAN INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS COUNCIL (RIAC) G C S S LUB MEETINGS S ILATERAL C 1, B. Yakimanka street, 119180, Moscow, Russia S COMPETITIONS B S US HIP Tel.: +7 (495) 225 6283 ROUND TABLES HIP S ORKING PAPERS EPORT W S OADMAPS R S Fax: +7 (495) 225 6284 ANALYSIS AND FORECASTING IGRATION PAPER E E–mail: [email protected] CENARIOS E R B 3929 / 20182016 PARTNERSHIP S C www.russiancouncil.ru LOBAL REFERENCE BOOKS C S OMPETITION LIBRARY S ORKING ARTNER M NTERN IBRARY IEN G C W XPERT COMMENTARIES I L E P S S S OMMENTARIE ION SC C NTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS SS I S U S ORGANIZATION REFERENCE BOOKS DUCATION E IETY DISCUSSIONS SC C I LOBAL SUMMER SCHOOLS OADMAP XPERT UEST LECTURES OMPETITION G IVIL O INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS ILATERAL Report-29_Cover.indd 2 HOOL 12.12.2016 14:46:26 S C R C D G E E ANTHOLOGIES B RELATION WORKING PAPERS MEETING C NTHOLOGIE UMMER ONFEREN GLOBAL POLITICS IEN LUB C NTERNATIONAL S SC C S I A REFERENCE BOOKS C RUSSIAN INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS COUNCIL INSTITUTE OF FAR EASTERN STUDIES OF THE RUSSIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES INSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES AT FUDAN UNIVERSITY MOSCOW 2018 Russian International Affairs Council Institute of Far Eastern Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences Institute of International Studies at Fudan University Editor-in-Chief: I. Ivanov, RAS Corresponding Member, Dr. of History Authors: From Russia: S. Luzyanin, Dr. of History (Head); A. Kortunov, Ph.D. in History; A. Karneev, Ph.D. in History; V. Petrovsky, Dr. of Political Science; V. Kashin, Ph.D. in Political Science; I. Denisov; R. Epikhina; Y. Kulintsev; R. Mamedov; K. Kuzmina From China: Zhao Huasheng, Professor (Head); Liu Huaqin, Ph.D. in Economics; Shi Ze, Professor; Xing Guangcheng, Dr. of Law; Guo Shuqing, Professor, Dr. of History; Feng Yujun, Dr. of Law; Cai Cuihong, Professor, Ph.D. in International Relations; Zheng Jiyong, Ph.D. in International Relations Copy Editors: I. Timofeev, Ph.D. in Political Science; T. Makhmutov, Ph.D. in Political Science; K. Kuzmina; A. Larionova; A. Teslya; M. Smekalova Russian–Chinese Dialogue: The 2018 Model: Report No. 39/2018 / [S.G. Luzyanin (head) et al.; Zhao Huasheng (head) et al.]; [I.S. Ivanov (Editor-in-Chief)]; Russian International Affairs Council (RIAC). – Moscow: NPMP RIAC, 2018. – 152 p. – The names of authors are listed on reverse of title page. ISBN 978-5-6040388-1-9 This report presents the results of the analysis of the state of Russia–China relations in 2017 and the first quarter of 2018. Leading Russian and Chinese experts identify the achievements in the key areas of two states’ interaction and study the prospects for bilateral cooperation in light of the conclusions of the 19th CPC Congress and the results of the Russian Presidential election. The authors assess the prospects of reinforcing Russia–China cooperation on pending issues of global and regional agenda, promoting trade, economic, financial and investment ties to a new level as well as expanding educational and cultural exchanges. The scholars also formulate specific recommendations aimed at promoting bilateral interaction. Russian International Affairs Council thanks Lin Xu and Mees van der Werf for their help in preparing this publication. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of RIAC. Any linguistic inadequacies in the publication are the sole responsibility of the translators. Cover photo credits: REUTERS/Sergei Karpukhin/Pixstream. The full text is published on RIAC’s website. You can download the report or leave a comment via this direct link russiancouncil.ru/en/report39 © Authors, 2018 © Drafting, translation and design. NPMP RIAC, 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 5 The Development of the Comprehensive Partnership and Strategic Cooperation between Russia and China in a New Era 7 Priorities for the Development of Russia–China Relations in a New Historical Period 7 Impact of the 19th National Congress of the Communist Party of China on Russia–China Bilateral Relations 9 Cooperation between Russia and China on Pressing Global and Regional Issues 16 Russia, China and the Problems of Global Governance: the 2018 Model 16 Russia, China and the United States. Security and Development 17 Potential Cooperation between Russia and China in Ensuring Security in Neighbouring Regions 21 Prospects for Reducing Tension on the Korean Peninsula: Opportunities for Russia–China Cooperation 24 Prospects for Russia–China Cooperation in the Middle East 31 Russia–China Cooperation in Information Security, Information Space Governance and Artificial Intelligence 37 The Development of Russia—China Cooperation in the Eurasian Space 46 The Development of Cooperation within the Framework of the SCO 46 Development of the Greater Eurasian Partnership Initiative 51 Promoting the Implementation of the Belt and Road Initiative and Alignment with the EAEU 53 The Arctic as a Sphere of Russia–China Cooperation 57 Development of Trade and Economic Cooperation between Russia and China 66 Dynamics of Bilateral Trade 66 Joint Projects and Investment Cooperation between Russia and China 77 Russia–China Cooperation in the Banking and Financial Sector 84 Inter-Regional Cooperation 85 Russia–China Military-Technical Cooperation 94 Cooperation between Russia and China in Education, Culture, Sports, Media and Related Areas 98 Cooperation between Russia and China in Education, Culture, Sports, Media, and Related Areas: Key Events, Priority Areas and Support at the Government Level 98 RUSSIAN–CHINESE DIALOGUE: THE 2018 MODEL Russia and China: Opportunities for Expanding Cooperation in Higher Education 103 Chinese Language Study in Russia and Russian Language Study in China 111 Media Cooperation between Russia and China 112 Developing Contacts between the Russian and Chinese People 115 Tourism Exchanges in Russia–China Cooperation 118 Recommendations 120 Monitoring of the Key Events in Russia–China Relations in Q2–Q4 2017 and Q1 2018 126 About the Authors 148 4 Report 39 / 2018 RUSSIAN–CHINESE DIALOGUE: THE 2018 MODEL INTRODUCTION Introduction The comprehensive partnership and strategic cooperation between Russia and China continued progressively during the second half of 2017 and early 2018, receiving a new impetus on both the domestic and foreign policy fronts. Cooperation between Moscow and Beijing is being carried out within the new national context related to updating domestic political priorities and a new politi­ cal cycle starting in the two countries. The 19th National Congress of the Com­ munist Party of China (CPC) took place in October 2017, and the 13th National People’s Congress of the People’s Republic of China followed in March 2018 – the same month presidential elections were held in Russia. The re-election of Xi Jinping and Vladimir Putin as leaders of their countries reaffirms the coun­ tries’ commitment to the chosen course, in which the consistent strengthening of Russia–China cooperation in the bilateral and multilateral dimensions is an important foreign political component. In June 2018, Vladimir Putin attended the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) Summit in China, his first foreign state visit as the newly elected President of the Russian Federation was to China. The development of ties between Moscow and Beijing is taking place against the background of alienation between Russia and the West and the growing tensions in China–U.S. relations. In early 2018, the already profound crisis in Russia’s relations with Europe and the United States was deepened with a new round of mutual accusations, additional sanctions against Russian businesses and individuals, mass expulsion of diplomats and growing divergence of posi­ tions on a number of global and regional issues, including approaches to the settlement of the Syrian crisis.
Recommended publications
  • Rosneft's Offshore Partnerships: the Re-Opening of the Russian

    Rosneft's Offshore Partnerships: the Re-Opening of the Russian

    140 Polar Record 49 (249): 140–153 (2013). c Cambridge University Press 2012. doi:10.1017/S0032247412000137 Rosneft’s offshore partnerships: the re-opening of the Russian petroleum frontier? Indra Overland and Jakub Godzimirski Norwegian Institute of International Affairs, PB 8159, Dept., 0033 Oslo, Norway ([email protected]) Lars Petter Lunden and Daniel Fjaertoft Sigra Group, Fagerheimgata 8, 0567 Oslo, Norway Received December 2011; first published online 2 April 2012 ABSTRACT. During an intense period of only 14 months, from June 2010 to August 2011, six major cooperation agreements between oil companies were announced in Russia. Almost all of these partnerships involved offshore projects, with an international oil company as one of the partners and Rosneft as the other. The agreements were concentrated along Russia’s Arctic petroleum frontier, and the three that survived the longest involved oil or gas extraction in the Arctic. This article analyses and compares the contents and contexts of the agreements, to ascertain what they have to tell about access for international companies to Russia’s offshore petroleum resources and the influence of competing Russian political actors over the country’s petroleum sector. The article argues that the new partnerships did represent an intention to open up the Russian continental shelf, and that the agreements were driven and shaped by a series of needs: to secure foreign capital and competence, to reduce exploration risk, to lobby for a better tax framework, to show the government that necessary action was being taken to launch exploration activities, to improve Rosneft’s image abroad, and either to avert or prepare for future privatisation of state companies such as Rosneft.
  • The Killing of William Browder

    The Killing of William Browder

    THE KILLING OF WILLIAM BROWDER THE KILLING OF WILLIAM BROWDER Bill Browder, the fa lse crusader for justice and human rights and the self - styled No. 1 enemy of Vladimir Putin has perpetrated a brazen and dangerous deception upon the Weste rn world. This book traces the anatomy of this deception, unmasking the powerful forces that are pushing the West ern world toward yet another great war with Russia. ALEX KRAINER EQUILIBRIUM MONACO First published in Monaco in 20 17 Copyright © 201 7 by Alex Krainer ISBN 978 - 2 - 9556923 - 2 - 5 Material contained in this book may be reproduced with permission from its author and/or publisher, except for attributed brief quotations Cover page design, content editing a nd copy editing by Alex Krainer. Set in Times New Roman, book title in Imprint MT shadow To the people of Russia and the United States wh o together, hold the keys to the future of humanity. Enlighten the people generally, and tyranny and oppressions of body and mind will vanish like the evil spirits at the dawn of day. Thomas Jefferson Table of Contents 1. Bill Browder and I ................................ ................................ ............... 1 Browder’s 2005 presentation in Monaco ................................ .............. 2 Harvard club presentation in 2010 ................................ ........................ 3 Ru ssophobia and Putin - bashing in the West ................................ ......... 4 Red notice ................................ ................................ ............................ 6 Reading
  • 77 a Feature of the Russian Society in Its Current State Is the Crisis of Identity

    77 a Feature of the Russian Society in Its Current State Is the Crisis of Identity

    euroPOLIS vol. 7, no. 1/2013 THE REGIONAL IDENTITY OF THE SIBERIAN COMMUNITY: Major formation factors and reconstruction problems Vyacheslav V. Shevtsov Tomsk State University Abstract The article considers conditions, factors and mechanisms of regional Siberian identity formation in the historical past and in the modern conditions of poliethnic and multiconfessional Russia. The Siberian identity is presented by hierarchy of identities: regional and territorial (territories and areas), national and territorial (autonomous republics and areas), ethnic, religious and professional ones. The level of the Siberian identity is proportional to the level of resource, technological, historical and cultural self-sufficiency of the Siberian society. Today the Siberian identity is realized mainly at the level of separate territories and national and territorial formations as well. At the same time, the strengthening of the confessional and ethnocultural identity role, expressed in the growth of the number of religious, national and cultural associations and autonomies, became a new phenomenon. Keywords: Siberia, identity, Russia, community. Introduction In the last decade of the XX century, marked by mondialisation and the transformations of the political map of Europe, a surge in scientific interest towards problems of regional identity and the emergence of the theories of «neo - a regionalism» (Keating 1998) are evident. On the other side of the Atlantic these problems are briskly discussed in Quebec, where both academics and the public compare the quest for identity at home and in Europe (Palard & all 2006; Therien & all. 2004). In 2000, in Montreal, a congress gathering leading economists, political scientists, sociologists, anthropologists and ministers of the federal government debated on the topic of «Mondialisation and national identity».
  • Knowledge Transfer Between Russian and Western Firms

    Knowledge Transfer Between Russian and Western Firms

    Michailova and Jormanainen “Knowledge transfer between Russian and Western firms: Whose absorptive capacity is in question?”: A reply Michailova and Jormanainen (forthcoming) are trying to challenge the mainstream (or, rather, expressed in rare papers on Russian management in A and B-level journals) conviction that the “deep and wide stream of Western business knowledge is flowing to Russia, but due to the limited absorptive capacity of Russian firms that flow does not allow to irrigate properly the somehow virgin land of the 6th largest world economy, but creates instead swamps and “quagmires” that engulf even the most ambitious initiatives to enhance value creation”. They put forward three major arguments: Soviet experience and knowledge is still valid and forms a background for actions of Russian firms; Soviet experience serves as a “sieve” for cautious imitation and selective acquisition of Western business models and management techniques; Some aspects of genuine Russian business techniques should be properly used by foreign companies operating in Russia, and also may have wider impact on international practices of leading MNCs. Michailova and Jormanainen have strong personal interests in defending such arguments. As by their own words “Half and a third of [their] lives respectively so far has been split between living in [their] native countries and the West”, they are proud to demonstrate that the Western education they received is properly used to create knowledge valuable to the global academic audience. We do not intend to attack their arguments as we consider them correct in many aspects. However, we must admit that Michailova and Jormanainen presented a complex phenomenon of knowledge transfer in a rather simplistic way.
  • The Palgrave Handbook of Digital Russia Studies

    The Palgrave Handbook of Digital Russia Studies

    The Palgrave Handbook of Digital Russia Studies Edited by Daria Gritsenko Mariëlle Wijermars · Mikhail Kopotev The Palgrave Handbook of Digital Russia Studies Daria Gritsenko Mariëlle Wijermars • Mikhail Kopotev Editors The Palgrave Handbook of Digital Russia Studies Editors Daria Gritsenko Mariëlle Wijermars University of Helsinki Maastricht University Helsinki, Finland Maastricht, The Netherlands Mikhail Kopotev Higher School of Economics (HSE University) Saint Petersburg, Russia ISBN 978-3-030-42854-9 ISBN 978-3-030-42855-6 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42855-6 © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2021. This book is an open access publication. Open Access This book is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this book are included in the book’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the book’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specifc statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.
  • Mr. Chairman, I Welcome the Opportunity to Appear Before The

    Mr. Chairman, I Welcome the Opportunity to Appear Before The

    Mr. Chairman, I welcome the opportunity to appear before the Helsinki Commission to discuss the current situation in Russia and the concerns of all of us about the Putin government and the future of Russia. First, I wish to emphasize the value of the Commission’s mandate and stated criteria to promote compliance with the fundamental standards of civil society in Russia and the other former Soviet republics. Second, those of us who have witnessed first-hand the travesty of justice in Russia much appreciate the concerns expressed by the co-chairmen about the improper handling of the Yukos trial and the sentencing of Mikhail Khodorkovsky and his colleagues by Russian authorities. Your formal statement to the world’s press that the “case appears to the world to be justice directed by politics” and that the “selective prosecution such as appears to be the case here will wreak havoc on Russia’s legal system” reflects that the chairmen of this commission have an accurate view of the Khodorkovsky trial and the weakened state of the legal system in Russia. Third, it is vitally important that the Helsinki Commission continue monitoring the implementation of the provisions of the 1975 Helsinki Accords as they relate to Russia and report its findings to the public. While the U.S. Administration and Congressional leaders must necessarily balance many variables in the bilateral relationship, the Helsinki Commission has a clear mandate to insure that human rights and basic freedoms are maintained in the countries under its jurisdiction. Mr. Chairman, it is my opinion that the rule of law is the cornerstone of civil society because it serves to protect the rights and freedoms of all citizens.
  • 2021 Wave Electronics and Its Application in Information and Telecommunication Systems»

    2021 Wave Electronics and Its Application in Information and Telecommunication Systems»

    XXIV International Conference WECONF-2021 «2021 WAVE ELECTRONICS AND ITS APPLICATION IN INFORMATION AND TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS» (IEEE Conference Record #51603) 31 May to 04 June 2021 CONFERENCE PROGRAM St-Petersburg 2021 ОРГАНИЗАТОРЫ КОНФЕРЕНЦИИ САНКТ-ПЕТЕРБУРГСКИЙ ГОСУДАРСТВЕННЫЙ УНИВЕРСИТЕТ АЭРОКОСМИЧЕСКОГО ПРИБОРОСТРОЕНИЯ (ГУАП) ИНСТИТУТ РАДИОТЕХНИКИ И ЭЛЕКТРОНИКИ ИМ. В. А. КОТЕЛЬНИКОВА РОССИЙСКОЙ АКАДЕМИИ НАУК, г. МОСКВА АО «МОРИОН», г. САНКТ-ПЕТЕРБУРГ ИЗДАТЕЛЬСКИЙ ДОМ «МЕДИА ПАБЛИШЕР», г. МОСКВА IEEE – INSTITUTE OF ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS OSA – THE OPTICAL SOCIETY SPIE – INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR OPTICS AND PHOTONICS РЕГИОНАЛЬНЫЙ ЦЕНТР НТИ ПО НАПРАВЛЕНИЮ «ТЕХНОЛОГИИ БЕСПРОВОДНОЙ СВЯЗИ И ИНТЕРНЕТА ВЕЩЕЙ» ПО СЕВЕРО-ЗАПАДНОМУ ФЕДЕРАЛЬНОМУ ОКРУГУ СЕКЦИИ КОНФЕРЕНЦИИ* CHAPTER 1. Acoustooptics (Акустооптика) CHAPTER 2. Acoustoelectronics (Акустоэлектроника) CHAPTER 3. Methods and devices of information processing (Методы и устройства обработки информации) CHAPTER 4. Data processing and transmission in information and telecommunication systems (Обработка и передача информации в инфокоммуникационных системах) CHAPTER 5. Round table «Acoustoelectronics and acoustooptics: problems, prospects and applications» (Круглый стол «Акустооптика и акустоэлектроника: проблемы, перспективы и области применения») CHAPTER 6. Electromechanics and control systems (Встроенные микроэлектронные системы) CHAPTER 7. Microelectronic Embedded Systems (Электромеханика и системы управления) CHAPTER 8. Modeling and situational quality management in
  • The Trump-Russia Collusion Case

    The Trump-Russia Collusion Case

    The Trump-Russia Collusion Case Updated to August 2020 Source: http://www.scaruffi.com/politics/trumptraitor.html For those who have been following this page for a while: my main target is not Trump, my target is Putin. Putin, not Trump, is the most dangerous person in the world. Trump is just a lackey, a small-time crook and bit-time liar whom Putin is using to attack the USA. The problem is not that there is no evidence of Trump-Putin collusion, the problem is that there is too much of it. I have added some background about the motive of Russia's interference in US politics. In my opinion, it was not only a general attempt at undermining US institutions (that came later) but originally it was a determined effort to make sure that Hillary Clinton did not become president. Putin feared her more than anyone else. For those who have NOT followed this page from the beginning: this website was one of the first to talk about the Trump-Russia collusion at a time when few dared mention the Steele dossier. Just to be very clear: this is not about whether Russia's interference changed the results of the election (i personally think that the FBI investigation into Clinton's email server had a much bigger impact). It is about Putin's strategy to attack the USA, and, secondly, it is about the extent of Trump's collaboration with Putin. And, just to be fair, Putin's Russia is not the only country that ever interfered in US politics.
  • An Assessment of Russian Civil Society (2005)

    An Assessment of Russian Civil Society (2005)

    An Assessment of Russian Civil Society (2005) CIVICUS CIVIL SOCIETY INDEX REPORT FOR THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION L. Proskuryakova’, Е. Vandisheva – St. Petersburg “Strategy” Center; N. Belyaeva, Е. Bychkova – State University – Higher School of Economics, 2005 St. Petersburg Center for Humanities and Political Studies “Strategy” in collaboration with the Departments of Public Policy of the Moscow State University – Higher School of Economics CIVICUS Civil Society Index Short Assessment Tool (CSI-SAT) An international action-research project coordinated by CIVICUS: World Alliance for Citizen Participation 1 FOREWORD The CSI-SAT in Russia was carried out by the National coordinating organisation in Russia - St. Petersburg “Strategy” Center in cooperation with the Moscow State University-Higher School of Economics. St. Petersburg “Strategy” Center was created in 1993 with the mission to provide “Assistance in establishment of civil society and constitutional state in Russia through implementing projects and programs aimed at development of public participation, social partnership and responsibility of the authorities”. Nowadays, “Strategy” Center is itself developed into a full- fledged resource and support center for public policy centers in Russia and abroad. St. Petersburg “Strategy” Centre is a member of CIVICUS and other international civil society networks. “Strategy” Centre is the only one in the North-West and one of few in Russia relatively steadily functioning public policy centre sustaining independence from authorities and corporate interests. “Strategy” Centre has been a politically non-partisan organisation since its date of establishment, independent of political forces, and does not engage in election campaign activities, for the same reason. Current programs of “Strategy” Center include: 1.
  • International Winter Schools in Russia

    International Winter Schools in Russia

    International winter schools in Russia COUNTRY OVERVIEW Geography Russia spans from the eastern plains of Europe to the Pacific Ocean in Asia, making it the largest country in the world. The coasts of Russia are washed by 12 seas and three oceans. There is hardly any country in the world where such a variety of scenery and vegetation can be found: steppes in the south, plains and forests in the midlands, tundra and taiga in the north, highlands and deserts in the east. There are 11 time zones in Russia, which is more than in any other country in the world. Climate Due to its vast territory, Russia is a country of natural contrasts. The northern part of the country is located in arctic and subarctic climate zones, while the southern regions have a subtropical climate. Normally Moscow, St. Petersburg and Kazan have very warm summers and fairly cold winters, while Tomsk in Siberia often has temperatures of -40 C or colder in winter. Culture Despite its vast area the population is 146 million people, less than the United States, Brazil or Pakistan. However, it is extremely diverse culturally. There are about 185 ethnic groups, whereas Slavs (the first inhabitants of Russia, Ukraine and Belarus) comprise the major ethnicity. Russian is the only official language across the country, but there are more than 25 different languages that are considered official in certain regions. Economy Russia is the biggest gas and second biggest oil exporter in the world and also has vast stocks of precious metals. Other important sectors include information technology, defense, agriculture and aerospace.
  • State Practice of Asian Countries in International Law Vietnam

    State Practice of Asian Countries in International Law Vietnam

    State Practice of Asian Countries in International Law Vietnam Tran Viet Dung* International Economic Law – Expropriation – Investor-State Dispute Settlement – Property Taking – Investor Protection Trinh Vinh Binh v. Socialist Republic of Vietnam (International Court of Arbitration – International Chamber of Commerce) From 21 August 2017 to 27 August 2017, the International Court of Arbitration (ica) begun the hearing between Mr. Trinh Vinh Binh, a Dutch-Vietnamese businessman, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam. The case concerns the alledged breaches by Vietnam the 1994 Treaty between Vietnam and Nether- lands on Encouragement and Reciprocal Protection of Investments (bit). The Trinh Vinh Binh v. Vietnam case was originally initiated in 2003 before the Stockholm Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce by Mr. Trinh. The case arose out of Mr. Trinh’s investment in real estate, food processing and several tourism assets in Vietnam in the early 1990s. As the Law on Foreign Investment 1987 did not allow foreigners (including Vietnamese with foreign citizenship) to use their own names to buy house and receive transfer of land ownership, Mr. Trinh asked his family members to use their names to register ownership of the land, houses and a few Vietnamese busi- nesses in order to justify these certificates prima facie. In 1996, Mr. Trinh was arrested and prosecuted by the provincial competent authorities for many criminal charges, including violations of regulations on land rights, tax evasion and bribery. It was reported that until the time of being arrested, Mr. Trinh held the de facto ownership of 11 houses, 114 grounds and 2,847,745 meter square of land.
  • 841 Copyright © 2019 by Academic Publishing House Researcher S.R.O. All Rights Reserved. Published in the Slovak Republic Europ

    841 Copyright © 2019 by Academic Publishing House Researcher S.R.O. All Rights Reserved. Published in the Slovak Republic Europ

    European Journal of Contemporary Education, 2019, 8(4) Copyright © 2019 by Academic Publishing House Researcher s.r.o. All rights reserved. Published in the Slovak Republic European Journal of Contemporary Education E-ISSN 2305-6746 2019, 8(4): 841-854 DOI: 10.13187/ejced.2019.4.841 www.ejournal1.com WARNING! Article copyright. Copying, reproduction, distribution, republication (in whole or in part), or otherwise commercial use of the violation of the author(s) rights will be pursued on the basis of international legislation. Using the hyperlinks to the article is not considered a violation of copyright. The Formation of the Eurasian Research-and-Education Ecosystem and the Internationalization of Educational Platforms: the Case of Russia and China Nina Pestereva a , *, Sun Yuhua b, Mariya Belyakova c, Feng Jgin b a Peoples' Friendship University of Russia, Moscow, Russian Federation b Dalian University of Foreign Languages, Dalian, People's Republic of China c Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, Russian Federation Abstract The object of this study is to assess the potential for the development of the Russian market for educational services as a component part of the present-day process of internationalization of science and higher education in the countries of Eurasia, above all China and Russia. The paper describes Russia’s and China’s unique unifying and coordinating role in the development of a common educational space, which must result in the creation of a Eurasian research-and- education ecosystem. The authors conducted an analysis of the current structure of the ecosystem. The authors conducted an analysis of the current structure of the education ecosystem.