Carbon Sequestration Potential of the Secondary Growth Forest Along The
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Macaranga Tanarius Parasol Leaf Tree Euphorbiaceae
Macaranga tanarius Parasol leaf tree Euphorbiaceae Forest Starr, Kim Starr, and Lloyd Loope United States Geological Survey--Biological Resources Division Haleakala Field Station, Maui, Hawai'i January, 2003 OVERVIEW Macaranga tanarius, native to Malaysia, is a medium size tree that is cultivated for ornament and reforestation in Hawai'i and other tropical regions of the world. In Hawai'i, M. tanarius is naturalized in disturbed mesic valleys on Kaua'i, O'ahu, and Maui (Oppenheimer et al. 1999, Wagner et al. 1999). On Maui, M. tanarius is widely naturalized in the Waikapu area of West Maui where it forms dense thickets in mesic valleys and streams from near sea level up to about 4,400 ft (1,341 m) elevation. On East Maui, only a single cultivated tree is currently known from a residential planting in Ha'iku. On West Maui, the infestation may not be feasible to control due to the vast area that it covers in steep and difficult terrain. On East Maui, there will always be the potential of re-invasion from the west side of the island, but control of the lone tree now may prevent a large infestation from occurring in the future. TAXONOMY Family: Euphorbiaceae (spurge family) (Wagner et al. 1999). Latin name: Macaranga tanarius (L.) Mull. Arg. (Wagner et al. 1999). Synonyms: Ricinus tanarius L. (Wagner et al. 1999), Macaranga molliuscula Kurz, Macaranga tomentosa Druce, Mappa tanarius Blume (World Agroforestry Centre 2002). Common names: Parasol leaf tree (Randall 2002), Macaranga (Neal 1965). Taxonomic notes: The genus, Macaranga, is made up of 250-280 species from tropical Africa, Madagascar, and Malesia to Australia and some parts of the Pacific, though none are native to Hawai'i (Wagner et al. -
Title Evolutionary Relationships Between Pollination and Protective Mutualisms in the Genus Macaranga (Euphorbiaceae)( Dissertat
Evolutionary relationships between pollination and protective Title mutualisms in the genus Macaranga (Euphorbiaceae)( Dissertation_全文 ) Author(s) Yamasaki, Eri Citation 京都大学 Issue Date 2014-03-24 URL https://doi.org/10.14989/doctor.k18113 学位規則第9条第2項により要約公開; 許諾条件により本文 Right は2019-06-25に公開 Type Thesis or Dissertation Textversion ETD Kyoto University Evolutionary relationships between pollination and protective mutualisms in the genus Macaranga (Euphorbiaceae) Eri Yamasaki 2014 1 2 Contents 摘要.…………………………………………………………………………………..5 Summary.……………………………………………………………………………..9 Chapter 1 General introduction……………………………………………………………….14 Chapter 2 Diversity of pollination systems in Macaranga Section 2.1 Diversity of bracteole morphology in Macaranga ………………………….20 Section 2.2 Wind and insect pollination (ambophily) in Mallotus , a sister group of Macaranga …………..…………..……...…………..………………………...31 Section 2.3 Disk-shaped nectaries on bracteoles of Macaranga sinensis provide a reward for pollinators……………………………….………………………………...45 Chapter 3 Interactions among plants, pollinators and guard ants in ant-plant Macaranga Section 3.1 Density of ant guards on inflorescences and their effects on herbivores and pollinators…………………………………………………….......................56 Section 3.2 Anal secretions of pollinator thrips of Macaranga winkleri repel guard ants…….71 Chapter 4 General discussion.………………….……………………………………………...85 Appendix…………………………………………………………………….………89 Acknowledgement…………………………………………………………….…...101 Literature cited……………………………….…………………………………….103 -
Nazrin Full Phd Thesis (150246576
Maintenance and conservation of Dipterocarp diversity in tropical forests _______________________________________________ Mohammad Nazrin B Abdul Malik A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Faculty of Science Department of Animal and Plant Sciences November 2019 1 i Thesis abstract Many theories and hypotheses have been developed to explain the maintenance of diversity in plant communities, particularly in hyperdiverse tropical forests. Maintenance of the composition and diversity of tropical forests is vital, especially species of high commercial value. I focus on the high value dipterocarp timber species of Malaysia and Borneo as these have been extensive logged owing to increased demands from global timber trade. In this thesis, I explore the drivers of diversity of this group, as well as the determinants of global abundance, conservation and timber value. The most widely supported hypothesis for explaining tropical diversity is the Janzen Connell hypothesis. I experimentally tested the key elements of this, namely density and distance dependence, in two dipterocarp species. The results showed that different species exhibited different density and distance dependence effects. To further test the strength of this hypothesis, I conducted a meta-analysis combining multiple studies across tropical and temperate study sites, and with many species tested. It revealed significant support for the Janzen- Connell predictions in terms of distance and density dependence. Using a phylogenetic comparative approach, I highlight how environmental adaptation affects dipterocarp distribution, and the relationships of plant traits with ecological factors and conservation status. This analysis showed that environmental and ecological factors are related to plant traits and highlights the need for dipterocarp conservation priorities. -
13. ANTIDESMA Burman Ex Linnaeus, Sp. Pl. 2: 1027. 1753. 五月茶属 Wu Yue Cha Shu Li Bingtao (李秉滔 Li Ping-Tao); Petra Hoffmann Rhytis Loureiro; Stilago Linnaeus
Fl. China 11: 209–215. 2008. 13. ANTIDESMA Burman ex Linnaeus, Sp. Pl. 2: 1027. 1753. 五月茶属 wu yue cha shu Li Bingtao (李秉滔 Li Ping-tao); Petra Hoffmann Rhytis Loureiro; Stilago Linnaeus. Trees or erect shrubs, dioecious; indumentum of simple hairs. Leaves alternate, eglandular; stipules small; petiole usually short; leaf blade simple, margin entire, venation pinnate. Inflorescences axillary, sometimes apparently terminal, or cauline, spikes or ra- cemes, sometimes much branched. Male flowers: calyx 3–5(–8)-lobed, cup-shaped, lobes imbricate; petals absent; disk extrastaminal, annular or cushion-shaped (enclosing bases of stamens and pistillode), or consisting of free lobes; stamens (1–)3–5(– 7), inserted inside/within disk or sinus of disk lobes, incurved in bud, afterward straight; filaments longer than sepals; anthers 2- locular, connectives U-shaped; thecae separate from each other, resembling swollen ends of U, raised at anthesis, dehiscing longitudinally; pistillode usually present. Female flowers: sepals as in male; disk annular surrounding ovary, entire; ovary longer than sepals, usually 1-locular; ovules 2 per locule, pendent; styles 2–4, short, terminal to lateral, apex usually bifid. Fruit a drupe, ovoid, ellipsoid, or lens-shaped, with many areoles when dry, crowned with persistent styles, usually 1-seeded. Seeds small, endosperm fleshy, cotyledon flattened and broad. x = 13. About 100 species: mainly the tropics and subtropics of Asia but also in Africa (8 species), the Pacific islands (5–8 species), and Australia (5–7 species); 11 species (two endemic) in China. Material of species no. 11, Antidesma hontaushanense, described from Taiwan (Lan Yu), has not been seen and the available description is too poor to include this taxon within the key to species. -
Weiblen, G.D. 2002 How to Be a Fig Wasp. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 47:299
25 Oct 2001 17:34 AR ar147-11.tex ar147-11.sgm ARv2(2001/05/10) P1: GJB Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2002. 47:299–330 Copyright c 2002 by Annual Reviews. All rights reserved ! HOW TO BE A FIG WASP George D. Weiblen University of Minnesota, Department of Plant Biology, St. Paul, Minnesota 55108; e-mail: [email protected] Key Words Agaonidae, coevolution, cospeciation, parasitism, pollination ■ Abstract In the two decades since Janzen described how to be a fig, more than 200 papers have appeared on fig wasps (Agaonidae) and their host plants (Ficus spp., Moraceae). Fig pollination is now widely regarded as a model system for the study of coevolved mutualism, and earlier reviews have focused on the evolution of resource conflicts between pollinating fig wasps, their hosts, and their parasites. Fig wasps have also been a focus of research on sex ratio evolution, the evolution of virulence, coevolu- tion, population genetics, host-parasitoid interactions, community ecology, historical biogeography, and conservation biology. This new synthesis of fig wasp research at- tempts to integrate recent contributions with the older literature and to promote research on diverse topics ranging from behavioral ecology to molecular evolution. CONTENTS INTRODUCING FIG WASPS ...........................................300 FIG WASP ECOLOGY .................................................302 Pollination Ecology ..................................................303 Host Specificity .....................................................304 Host Utilization .....................................................305 -
TAXON:Ficus Macrophylla Pers. SCORE:9.0 RATING:High Risk
TAXON: Ficus macrophylla Pers. SCORE: 9.0 RATING: High Risk Taxon: Ficus macrophylla Pers. Family: Moraceae Common Name(s): Australian banyan Synonym(s): Ficus magnolioides Borzì black fig Moreton Bay fig Assessor: Chuck Chimera Status: Assessor Approved End Date: 15 Oct 2019 WRA Score: 9.0 Designation: H(Hawai'i) Rating: High Risk Keywords: Strangler Fig, Naturalized, Environmental Weed, Bird-Dispersed, Resprouts Qsn # Question Answer Option Answer 101 Is the species highly domesticated? y=-3, n=0 n 102 Has the species become naturalized where grown? 103 Does the species have weedy races? Species suited to tropical or subtropical climate(s) - If 201 island is primarily wet habitat, then substitute "wet (0-low; 1-intermediate; 2-high) (See Appendix 2) High tropical" for "tropical or subtropical" 202 Quality of climate match data (0-low; 1-intermediate; 2-high) (See Appendix 2) High 203 Broad climate suitability (environmental versatility) y=1, n=0 n Native or naturalized in regions with tropical or 204 y=1, n=0 y subtropical climates Does the species have a history of repeated introductions 205 y=-2, ?=-1, n=0 y outside its natural range? 301 Naturalized beyond native range y = 1*multiplier (see Appendix 2), n= question 205 y 302 Garden/amenity/disturbance weed n=0, y = 1*multiplier (see Appendix 2) n 303 Agricultural/forestry/horticultural weed n=0, y = 2*multiplier (see Appendix 2) n 304 Environmental weed n=0, y = 2*multiplier (see Appendix 2) y 305 Congeneric weed n=0, y = 1*multiplier (see Appendix 2) y 401 Produces spines, thorns or burrs y=1, n=0 n 402 Allelopathic 403 Parasitic y=1, n=0 n 404 Unpalatable to grazing animals y=1, n=-1 n 405 Toxic to animals y=1, n=0 n 406 Host for recognized pests and pathogens y=1, n=0 y 407 Causes allergies or is otherwise toxic to humans 408 Creates a fire hazard in natural ecosystems y=1, n=0 n 409 Is a shade tolerant plant at some stage of its life cycle y=1, n=0 y Creation Date: 15 Oct 2019 (Ficus macrophylla Pers.) Page 1 of 20 TAXON: Ficus macrophylla Pers. -
WRA Species Report
Family: Euphorbiaceae Taxon: Macaranga tanarius Synonym: Ricinus tanarius L. Common Name: Questionaire : current 20090513 Assessor: Patti Clifford Designation: Status: Assessor Approved Data Entry Person: Patti Clifford WRA Score 12 101 Is the species highly domesticated? y=-3, n=0 n 102 Has the species become naturalized where grown? y=1, n=-1 103 Does the species have weedy races? y=1, n=-1 201 Species suited to tropical or subtropical climate(s) - If island is primarily wet habitat, then (0-low; 1-intermediate; 2- High substitute "wet tropical" for "tropical or subtropical" high) (See Appendix 2) 202 Quality of climate match data (0-low; 1-intermediate; 2- High high) (See Appendix 2) 203 Broad climate suitability (environmental versatility) y=1, n=0 y 204 Native or naturalized in regions with tropical or subtropical climates y=1, n=0 y 205 Does the species have a history of repeated introductions outside its natural range? y=-2, ?=-1, n=0 y 301 Naturalized beyond native range y = 1*multiplier (see y Appendix 2), n= question 205 302 Garden/amenity/disturbance weed n=0, y = 1*multiplier (see y Appendix 2) 303 Agricultural/forestry/horticultural weed n=0, y = 2*multiplier (see n Appendix 2) 304 Environmental weed n=0, y = 2*multiplier (see n Appendix 2) 305 Congeneric weed n=0, y = 1*multiplier (see y Appendix 2) 401 Produces spines, thorns or burrs y=1, n=0 y 402 Allelopathic y=1, n=0 403 Parasitic y=1, n=0 n 404 Unpalatable to grazing animals y=1, n=-1 n 405 Toxic to animals y=1, n=0 n 406 Host for recognized pests and pathogens y=1, -
Dictionary of Cultivated Plants and Their Regions of Diversity Second Edition Revised Of: A.C
Dictionary of cultivated plants and their regions of diversity Second edition revised of: A.C. Zeven and P.M. Zhukovsky, 1975, Dictionary of cultivated plants and their centres of diversity 'N -'\:K 1~ Li Dictionary of cultivated plants and their regions of diversity Excluding most ornamentals, forest trees and lower plants A.C. Zeven andJ.M.J, de Wet K pudoc Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation Wageningen - 1982 ~T—^/-/- /+<>?- •/ CIP-GEGEVENS Zeven, A.C. Dictionary ofcultivate d plants andthei rregion so f diversity: excluding mostornamentals ,fores t treesan d lowerplant s/ A.C .Zeve n andJ.M.J ,d eWet .- Wageninge n : Pudoc. -11 1 Herz,uitg . van:Dictionar y of cultivatedplant s andthei r centreso fdiversit y /A.C .Zeve n andP.M . Zhukovsky, 1975.- Me t index,lit .opg . ISBN 90-220-0785-5 SISO63 2UD C63 3 Trefw.:plantenteelt . ISBN 90-220-0785-5 ©Centre forAgricultura l Publishing and Documentation, Wageningen,1982 . Nopar t of thisboo k mayb e reproduced andpublishe d in any form,b y print, photoprint,microfil m or any othermean swithou t written permission from thepublisher . Contents Preface 7 History of thewor k 8 Origins of agriculture anddomesticatio n ofplant s Cradles of agriculture and regions of diversity 21 1 Chinese-Japanese Region 32 2 Indochinese-IndonesianRegio n 48 3 Australian Region 65 4 Hindustani Region 70 5 Central AsianRegio n 81 6 NearEaster n Region 87 7 Mediterranean Region 103 8 African Region 121 9 European-Siberian Region 148 10 South American Region 164 11 CentralAmerica n andMexica n Region 185 12 NorthAmerica n Region 199 Specieswithou t an identified region 207 References 209 Indexo fbotanica l names 228 Preface The aimo f thiswor k ist ogiv e thereade r quick reference toth e regionso f diversity ofcultivate d plants.Fo r important crops,region so fdiversit y of related wild species areals opresented .Wil d species areofte nusefu l sources of genes to improve thevalu eo fcrops . -
Phyllanthaceae
Species information Abo ut Reso urces Hom e A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Phyllanthaceae Family Profile Phyllanthaceae Family Description A family of 59 genera and 1745 species, pantropiocal but especially in Malesia. Genera Actephila - A genus of about 20 species in Asia, Malesia and Australia; about ten species occur naturally in Australia. Airy Shaw (1980a, 1980b); Webster (1994b); Forster (2005). Antidesma - A genus of about 170 species in Africa, Madagascar, Asia, Malesia, Australia and the Pacific islands; five species occur naturally in Australia. Airy Shaw (1980a); Henkin & Gillis (1977). Bischofia - A genus of two species in Asia, Malesia, Australia and the Pacific islands; one species occurs naturally in Australia. Airy Shaw (1967). Breynia - A genus of about 25 species in Asia, Malesia, Australia and New Caledonia; seven species occur naturally in Australia. Backer & Bakhuizen van den Brink (1963); McPherson (1991); Webster (1994b). Bridelia - A genus of about 37 species in Africa, Asia, Malesia and Australia; four species occur naturally in Australia. Airy Shaw (1976); Dressler (1996); Forster (1999a); Webster (1994b). Cleistanthus - A genus of about 140 species in Africa, Madagascar, Asia, Malesia, Australia, Micronesia, New Caledonia and Fiji; nine species occur naturally in Australia. Airy Shaw (1976, 1980b); Webster (1994b). Flueggea - A genus of about 16 species, pantropic but also in temperate eastern Asia; two species occur naturally in Australia. Webster (1984, 1994b). Glochidion - A genus of about 200 species, mainly in Asia, Malesia, Australia and the Pacific islands; about 15 species occur naturally in Australia. -
“Desenvolvimento Da Flor E Da Inflorescência Em Espécies De
UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO FFCLRP - DEPARTAMENTO DE BIOLOGIA PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM BIOLOGIA COMPARADA “Desenvolvimento da flor e da inflorescência em espécies de Moraceae”. VIVIANE GONÇALVES LEITE Tese apresentada à Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto da USP, como parte das exigências para a obtenção do título de Doutor em Ciências, Área: Biologia Comparada RIBEIRÃO PRETO - SP 2016 VIVIANE GONÇALVES LEITE “Desenvolvimento da flor e da inflorescência em espécies de Moraceae”. Tese apresentada à Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto da USP, como parte das exigências para a obtenção do título de Doutor em Ciências, Área: Biologia Comparada Orientadora: Profa. Dra. Simone de Pádua Teixeira RIBEIRÃO PRETO - SP 2016 Autorizo a reprodução e/ou divulgação total ou parcial deste trabalho, por qualquer meio convencional ou eletrônico, para fins de estudo e pesquisa, desde que citada a fonte. Catalogação na Publicação Serviço de Documentação Faculdade de Filosofia Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto Leite, Viviane Gonçalves Desenvolvimento da flor e da inflorescência em espécies de Moraceae. Ribeirão Preto, 2016. 135p. Tese de Doutorado, apresentada à Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto da USP. Área de concentração: Biologia Comparada. Orientadora: Simone de Pádua Teixeira. 1. análise de superfície, 2. arquitetura do receptáculo, 3. morfologia, 4. ontogenia floral, 5. pseudomonomeria. Leite, V. G. Desenvolvimento da flor e da inflorescência em espécies de Moraceae. Tese apresentada à Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto da USP, para obtenção do título de Doutor em Ciências – Área de Concentração: Biologia Comparada Aprovado em: Ribeirão Preto,____________________________________________de 2016. -
The Distribution of Macaranga Tanarius (L.) Mull
Borneo Journal of Sciences and Technology, Volume (1), Issue (2), Pages: 45-50 DOI: 10.35370/BJOST.2019.1.2-07 e-ISSN: 2672-7439 © 2019, UCTS Publisher. Submitted: 21st April 2019 Accepted: 15th May 2019 Published: 31st July 2019 The Distribution of Macaranga tanarius (L.) Mull. Arg. in Peninsular Malaysia Rosdi Koter 1,2, Mohd Zaki Hamzah 2,Nor Aini Abd Shukor 2,3, Hazandy Abdul Hamid 2,3, Wan Rasidah Kadir1, Patahayah Mansor1 and Mohd Zaki Isa1 1Forest Research Institute Malaysia (FRIM), 52109 Kepong, Selangor, Malaysia 2Faculty of Forestry, University Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM, Selangor, Malaysia 3Laboratory of Sustainable Bioresources Management, Institute of Tropical Forestry and Forest Product, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM, Selangor, Malaysia Abstract: Macaranga tanarius distribution has been identified in a study conducted by almost all states in Peninsular Malaysia. Assessment on the distribution of M. tanarius was based on the records available and type specimens housed in three different herbarium namely the Kepong Herbarium (KEP) in Forest Research Institute Malaysia, the herbarium in the Faculty of Forestry in Universiti Putra Malaysia and the Herbarium Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. While field surveys were carried out from July 2012 until October 2013. There are 128 specimens were assessed from the three herbaria which made in the year of 1925 to 2005. Field surveys showed that M. tanarius can be found from the state of Perlis in the north, to the state of Johor in the south. From the observation, M. tanarius is a commonly found species along the highways and the road sides, whether as single individuals or as mono-stands. -
Perennial Edible Fruits of the Tropics: an and Taxonomists Throughout the World Who Have Left Inventory
United States Department of Agriculture Perennial Edible Fruits Agricultural Research Service of the Tropics Agriculture Handbook No. 642 An Inventory t Abstract Acknowledgments Martin, Franklin W., Carl W. Cannpbell, Ruth M. Puberté. We owe first thanks to the botanists, horticulturists 1987 Perennial Edible Fruits of the Tropics: An and taxonomists throughout the world who have left Inventory. U.S. Department of Agriculture, written records of the fruits they encountered. Agriculture Handbook No. 642, 252 p., illus. Second, we thank Richard A. Hamilton, who read and The edible fruits of the Tropics are nnany in number, criticized the major part of the manuscript. His help varied in form, and irregular in distribution. They can be was invaluable. categorized as major or minor. Only about 300 Tropical fruits can be considered great. These are outstanding We also thank the many individuals who read, criti- in one or more of the following: Size, beauty, flavor, and cized, or contributed to various parts of the book. In nutritional value. In contrast are the more than 3,000 alphabetical order, they are Susan Abraham (Indian fruits that can be considered minor, limited severely by fruits), Herbert Barrett (citrus fruits), Jose Calzada one or more defects, such as very small size, poor taste Benza (fruits of Peru), Clarkson (South African fruits), or appeal, limited adaptability, or limited distribution. William 0. Cooper (citrus fruits), Derek Cormack The major fruits are not all well known. Some excellent (arrangements for review in Africa), Milton de Albu- fruits which rival the commercialized greatest are still querque (Brazilian fruits), Enriquito D.