Imagining the Perpetrator in Iraq War Fiction
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Ghent University Faculty of Arts and Philosophy Imagining the Perpetrator in Iraq War Fiction: Evan Wright’s Generation Kill and Kevin Powers’ The Yellow Birds Supervisor: Paper submitted in partial Dr. Tobi Smethurst fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of “Master in de Taal- en Letterkunde: Engels – Nederlands” by Karen De Loof May 2016 Acknowledgments First of all, I would like to thank my supervisor Prof. Tobi Smethurst, for her help with providing great sources and for answering all my questions. Secondly, I would like to refer to two courses that inspired me to write a thesis on the subject of trauma theory, which are Dr. Philippe Codde’s “Contemporary American Literature” and Dr. Stef Craps’ “Contemporary English Literature”. The cross-cultural subjects handled in these two courses gave rise to my interest in how literature, 21th century conflicts and trauma theory are interwoven. I would also especially like to thank my mother who took the time to proofread my whole thesis and bibliography and advised me to make spelling corrections where needed. Also a big thank you to all my family and friends for keeping me motivated by showing much interest in my dissertation. Table of contents 1. Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 1 2. Theoretical Framework ..................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Historical Framework .......................................................................................... 3 2.2 Contemporary Trauma Studies ............................................................................ 9 2.3 Perpetrator Trauma ............................................................................................. 18 2.3.1 Perpetrator Studies ............................................................................... 18 2.3.2 Combat ................................................................................................. 20 3. Introduction to Primary Sources ...................................................................................... 25 3.1 Iraq War .............................................................................................................. 25 3.2 Primary Sources ................................................................................................. 30 4. Close Reading .................................................................................................................. 35 4.1 Gradual Disillusionment .................................................................................... 35 4.2 During Combat: Insidious Trauma ..................................................................... 40 4.3 Rationalization ................................................................................................... 48 4.4 Coming Home .................................................................................................... 53 5. Conclusion ........................................................................................................................ 67 Works cited .......................................................................................................................... 71 Word count: 22 797 1. Introduction In my master dissertation I will explore the link between trauma studies and perpetrator fiction, more particularly with a focus on Iraq War fiction. The two novels I will discuss are Evan Wright’s Generation Kill and Kevin Powers’ The Yellow Birds. In these two Iraq War novels both authors draw attention to the involvement in overwhelming warfare and define the mental state of the individual soldiers. However, the novels wield contrasting perspectives. While Evan Wright takes up the position of an outsider -he is an embedded reporter who finds himself witnessing severe combat without actually participating-, Kevin Powers takes up the position of the veteran as he translates his own direct combat experiences and struggles. I particularly chose these two novels considering that the divergent view of a reporter and soldier on warfare offers an interesting starting point for my research. By drawing on a close reading of Generation Kill and The Yellow Birds I discuss the way in which these novels offer a thorough representation of the position of the Iraq War soldiers within the realms of trauma studies. My aim is to purvey a comparative study that shows an analysis of the structure of my two novels linked with trauma theory. To achieve this research question I will firstly give an overview of the origins of trauma theory, referring to trauma pioneers and their theories. In addition, I will look at contemporary trauma studies and refer to the core concepts of trauma. Subsequently, I will focus on the particular perpetrator studies and discuss trauma features typically linked to combat trauma. After my theoretical framework I will introduce the specifics of the Iraq War in order to then situate my two primary sources within the correct historical framework. I will then analyze my two books via a close reading in which I focus on four main aspects: the gradual disillusionment among soldiers, the insidious trauma in combat situations, the justification of their perpetrated actions and the aftermath of trauma. By exploring these four elements I am able to compare the 1 structure of the two novels and show how they deal with moral questions and the aftermath related to combat. Finally, I aim to conclude with a coherent overview of my findings. 2 2. Theoretical Framework In order to arrive at a coherent and correct understanding of the concept trauma, I will firstly investigate the origins of the term ‘trauma’. Therefore, I give a chronological overview of how the concept ‘trauma’ changed in meaning over the last decennia, and how it was used in different contexts. 2.1 Historical Framework Nowadays trauma is commonly defined as a disorder of memory: An overwhelming set of emotions of terror caused by certain events, cause the mind to split or dissociate: it is unable to register the wound to the psyche because the ordinary mechanisms of awareness and cognition are destroyed. As a result, the victim is unable to recollect and integrate the hurtful experience in normal consciousness: instead, she is haunted or possessed by intrusive traumatic memories. These memories intrude the victim’s mind generally through symptoms such as flashbacks, nightmares, numbing, guilt, violence… (Leys 2) This definition stated by Ruth Leys in her book Trauma: A Genealogy is a contemporary interpretation of trauma. The term was reinterpreted multiple times throughout the years. For example, it changed from being interpreted as a physical notion to a mere wounding of the mind. To describe the chronological process I will firstly address the original understanding of the term, and will then focus on the three main elements that helped to define the contemporary term trauma: Freud’s interpretation of hysteria, the reinterpretation after World War I and the meaning after the Vietnam war, which lead to the contemporary notion of Post 3 Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Furthermore, I will also focus on the stages of recovery; how a person diagnosed with traumatic symptoms was treated and how this notion evolved as well. Ruth Leys mentions in her definition of trauma ‘to register the wound to the psyche’. The use of the word ‘psyche’ already indicates a break with the original meaning and use of the concept trauma. The original use of the term trauma denoted a surgical wound, thus it was a physical term: a literal injury to the body (Leys 19). However, it was expanded with a psychological usage soon afterwards: the shock that causes the wound. The father of psychoanalysis, Sigmund Freud, adds to this interpretation the idea that an unexpected shock can also wound the mind. An event that takes place too soon, too suddenly, too unexpectedly to be fully grabbed by consciousness, is defined as a traumatic accident (Caruth, “Unclaimed” 101). The lack of preparedness of the mind for this sudden event causes a wound in the psyche. The event is not fully grasped at the moment of occurrence, therefore it is not processed and experienced as a normal incident. Consequently, the meaning of trauma was expanded; as it now marked a psychological interpretation as well. As claimed in Trauma: A Genealogy, the mind cannot handle the increase of stimulus as this is too powerful to be worked off in the normal way (23). This does not exclude occasions where physical and psychological reactions to a devastating event can go hand in hand. William Sargant, a British psychiatrist, recounts a case where a man’s right hand was paralyzed. When the soldier was in the fields, he came across his own brother, who was severely wounded. His brother asked to shoot him in order to release him from his misery and pain. It was the hand that pulled the trigger that became paralyzed afterwards. After he confessed the incident and his feelings of guilt and grief, the hand started working again (Leys 192). Whilst narrating the past traumatic event, his paralyzed hand gradually began to heal. This anecdote illustrates the importance of confession; I will discuss this in my second chapter. 4 Trauma came into public attention when neurologist Sigmund Freud and psychologist Pierre Janet were looking for an explanation for ‘female hysteria’. They both agreed that a psychological trauma could explain this hysterical behavior