• Abstract and Figures
• Public Full-text

QUICK REFERENCE CHART AND ANNOTATIONS FOR DETERMINING IMMIGRATION CONSEQUENCES OF SELECTED ARIZONA OFFENSES Immigrant Legal Resource Center Florence Immigrant and Refugee Rights Project Maricopa County Office of the Public Defender Principal authors are Katherine Brady, Holly Cooper, Kara Hartzler, Beth Houck, Angie Junck, and Ryan Moore i Introduction Note to Immigration Attorneys: Using the Chart. This chart was written for criminal defense counsel, not immigration counsel. It represents a fairly conservative view of the law, meant to guide criminal defense counsel away from potentially dangerous options and toward safer ones. Thus immigration counsel should not rely on the chart in deciding whether to pursue defense against removal. An offense may be listed as an aggravated felony or other adverse category here even if there are strong arguments to the contrary that might prevail in immigration proceedings. For a more detailed analysis of Ninth Circuit law, see cited sections of Defending Immigrants in the Ninth Circuit (www.ilrc.org, 2009) and other works in Note “Resources.” The Chart can provide guidance as to the risk of filing an affirmative application for a non- citizen with a criminal record. The Notes are concise and basic summaries of several key topics. 1. Using the Chart and Notes. The Chart analyzes adverse immigration consequences that flow from conviction of selected Arizona offenses and suggests how to avoid the consequences. Endnote annotations discuss each offense in greater detail. The Chart appears organized numerically by code section. Several short articles or “Notes” provide more explanation of selected topics. These include Notes that explain the Chart’s immigration categories, such as aggravated felonies and crimes involving moral turpitude, as well as those that discuss certain kinds of offenses, such as domestic violence or controlled substances. 2. Sending comments about the Chart. Contact us if you disagree with an analysis, see a relevant new case, want to suggest other offenses to be analyzed or to propose other alternate “safer” pleas, or want to say how the chart works for you or how it could be improved. Send email to [email protected]. This address will not answer legal questions. For consultations contact Kara Hartzler, Arizona Defending Immigrants Partnership, at the Florence Immigrant and Refugee Rights Project ([email protected]) or see information about obtaining legal consults on cases “contract services” at www.ilrc.org. 3. Need for Individual Analysis. This Chart and Notes are a summary of a complex body of law, to be consulted on-line or printed out and carried to courtrooms and client meetings for quick reference. However, more thorough individual analysis of a defendant’s immigration situation is needed to give competent defense advice. For example, the defense goals for representing a permanent resident are different from those for an undocumented person, and analysis also changes depending upon past convictions and what type of immigration relief is potentially available. See Note “Establishing Defense Goals.” The Chart and Notes are best used in conjunction with resource works such as Brady, Defending Immigrants in the Ninth Circuit (citations to specific sections are included throughout these materials) or Tooby, Criminal Defense of Immigrants, and/or along with consultation with an immigration expert. See Note “Resources.” Ideally each noncitizen defendant should complete a form such as the one found at Note “Immigrant Client Questionnaire,” which captures the information needed to make an ii immigration analysis and is a diagnostic aid. Some offices print these forms on colored paper, so that defenders can immediately identify the file as involving a noncitizen client and have the client data needed to begin the immigration analysis. 4. Disclaimer, Additional Resources. While federal courts have specifically affirmed the immigration consequences listed for some of these offenses, in other cases the chart represents only the authors’ opinion as to how courts are likely to rule. In addition there is the constant threat that Congress will amend the immigration laws and apply the change retroactively to past convictions. Defenders and noncitizen defendants need to be aware that the immigration consequences of crimes is a complex, unpredictable and constantly changing area of law where there are few guarantees. Defender offices should check accuracy of pleas and obtain up-to-date information. See books, websites, and services discussed in Note “Resources.” But using this guide and other works cited in the “Resources” Note will help defenders to give noncitizen defendants a greater chance to preserve or obtain lawful status in the United States – for many defendants, a goal as or more important than avoiding criminal penalties. Acknowledgements The Chart began with the impressive efforts of Ryan Moore, now with the Federal Defender’s Office of Arizona, when he was a law student at the University of Arizona. Since that time Katherine Brady and Angie Junck of the Immigrant Legal Resource Center (San Francisco); Holly Cooper of the Florence Immigrant and Refugee Rights Project (Florence), now teaching at the University of California Davis School of Law (Davis, CA); and Beth Houck of Maricopa County Office of the Public Defender (Phoenix) have been the primary authors. In 2008 and 2010, Kara Hartzler of the Arizona Defending Immigrants Partnership revised and expanded the Chart. The ILRC is grateful to our colleagues in the national Defending Immigrants Partnership and to the Gideon Project of the Open Society Institute for funding the national project. Copyright 2010 Immigrant Legal Resource Center and Florence Immigrant and Refugee Rights Project. Permission to reproduce is granted to criminal and immigration defense attorneys and advocates only. If you use these materials in a training, please notify [email protected], for our reporting purposes. iii Aggravated Aggravated Felony, defined at 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(A)-(U). The aggravated felony definition includes Felony twenty-one provisions that describe hundreds of offenses, which need not be aggravated or felonious. Aggravated felons under immigration law are ineligible to apply for most forms of discretionary relief from deportation including asylum, voluntary departure, and cancellation of removal. Conviction of an aggravated felony triggers mandatory detention without bond pending deportation. A conviction for illegal reentry after deportation or removal, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326, will carry a significantly higher federal prison term if the defendant was previously convicted of an aggravated felony. See 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2). See Note: Aggravated Felony CMT Crime Involving Moral Turpitude (CMT). A crime involves moral turpitude if it involves fraud, or it comes within a vague definition of involving evil intent or deviating from accepted rules of contemporary morality. Here, moral turpitude is defined according to federal immigration case law, and not, e.g., state cases on witness credibility or disbarment. For CMT determinations, see comments on individual offenses in this chart. A noncitizen is deportable who (a) is convicted of two CMT’s, which are not part of a “single scheme of criminal misconduct,” at any time after being admitted to the U.S. or (b) is convicted of one CMT, committed within five years of admission to the U.S., that carries a potential sentence of at least one year. 8 USC § 1227(a)(2)(A)(ii) and (i). A noncitizen is inadmissible if convicted of one CMT, unless he or she qualifies for the petty theft or youthful offender exception. To qualify for the petty theft exception, the person must have committed only one CMT, which has a potential sentence of not more than a year, and a sentence of not more than six months must have been imposed. To qualify for the youthful offender exception, the person must have committed only one CMT. 8 USC § 1182(a)(2)(A)(ii)(II) and (I). See Note: CMT. DRUG Controlled Substance offenses. A noncitizen is deportable and inadmissible if convicted of an offense “relating to a controlled substance (as defined in section 802 of Title 21).” There is an exception to the deportation ground, and a waiver of inadmissibility, for conviction of a single offense of possession or being under the influence of marijuana or hashish. To be deportable, the person must have been convicted after admission to the United States. 8 USC § 1227(a)(2)(B)(i) (deportability), 8 USC § 1182(a)(2)(A)(i)(II), (h) (inadmissibility, waiver). In many cases, the record of conviction must identify the specific controlled substance involved in order for the crime to have immigration consequences. See Note: Controlled Substances and comments on individual offenses in this chart. DV Crimes of Domestic Violence, Stalking, Violation of Protection Order, Crime of Child Abuse, Neglect or CHILDREN Abandonment. A noncitizen convicted of one of these offenses, or who is the subject of a court order finding certain types of violations of a domestic violence protective order, is deportable under 8 USC § 1227(a)(2)(E). A crime of domestic violence is defined as a “crime of violence” against a current or former spouse, cohabitant, person sharing a common child, or any other a person who is protected from the defendant’s acts under the domestic or family violence law. See Note: Domestic Violence and individual offenses in this chart. FIREARMS Firearms offenses, A noncitizen is deportable under 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(C) who at any time after admission is convicted “under any law of purchasing, selling, offering for sale, exchanging, using, owning, possessing, or carrying, or of attempting or conspiring to purchase, sell, offer for sale, exchange, use, own, possess, or carry, any weapon, part, or accessory which is a firearm or destructive device ….”. See Note: Firearms. DIVISIBLE One of the most important defense strategies comes from understanding and controlling the official “record of STATUTES, conviction” that will be considered by immigration authorities.

Load more

  97

Copy Link