MOLECULAR AND STRUCTURAL REQUIREMENTS OF THE
1L-ADRENOCEPTOR
Paul Klenowski BBiotech (Hons)
Submitted in [partial] fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy
Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation Faculty of Health Queensland University of Technology [September 2012]
Keywords
Affinity, agonist, antagonist, 1L-adrenoceptor, 1H-adrenoceptor, 2-adrenoceptor,
3-adrenoceptor, -blocker, (-)-bupranolol, cardiostimulation, cardiovascular, catecholamines, (-)-CGP 12177, (-)-[3H]- CGP 12177, chimera, contractility, crystal structure, cyclic AMP, G-protein coupled receptor, heterologous, human atrial force, human heart failure, (-)-isoprenaline, L-748,337, ligand, low-affinity binding site, L- type Ca2+ channel, molecular modelling, non-conventional partial agonists, noradrenaline, pindolol, positive inotropic effect, potency, radioligand binding, recombinant, site-directed mutagenesis, transmembrane domain
i
Abstract
There are two binding sites on the β1-adrenoceptor (AR), β1H and β1L corresponding to high and low-affinity binding sites respectively, which can be activated to cause cardiostimulation. Some β-blockers typified by (-)-CGP 12177 and
(-)-pindolol block β1AR and β2ARs, but also activate β1LARs at higher concentrations than those required to cause blockade. However, in a report by Skeberdis et al., (2008) it was proposed that the positive inotropic effects of (-)-CGP
12177 are mediated through β3ARs. Consequently, experiments were performed using human atrial trabeculae, to investigate whether the β3AR selective antagonist
L-748,337 could antagonise the positive inotropic effects of the β3AR agonists SR 58611, BRL 37344 and (-)-CGP 12177. These experiments did not detect inotropic effects of SR 58611 (1 nM-10 M). The positive inotropic effects of BRL 37344 were antagonised by the 1AR and 2AR antagonist nadolol (200 nM) and 2AR antagonist ICI 118,551 (50 nM). Concurrent ICI 118,551 and CGP 20712A (β1AR selective antagonist) addition caused a greater shift of the curve of BRL 37344 than
ICI 118,551 alone. Furthermore, the 3AR-selective antagonist L-748,337 (1 M) did not affect the responses to BRL 37344. These results indicate that the effects of
BRL 37344 are mediated through 1AR and 2AR but not 3AR.
(-)-CGP 12177 (200 nM) caused stable increases in contractile force which were significantly reduced by the addition of (-)-bupranolol (1 M) but not affected by the addition of L-748,337 (1 M, P = 0.001, 1-way ANOVA). The results of trabeculae obtained from 4 patients revealed that L-748,337 did not affect the response to (-)-CGP 12177 (P = 0.12), inconsistent with mediation through 3AR. In contrast, (-)-bupranolol reduced the response by 91 ± 16%, n = 4, P = 0.002, consistent with mediation through 1LAR, as observed before on human atrium
(Kaumann et al., 1996a) and recombinant 1AR (Joseph et al., 2004b).
Studies have demonstrated that β2AR does not form a corresponding low- affinity binding site (Baker et al., 2002), therefore it was hypothesised that
ii
heterologous β1- β2AR amino acids are responsible for the formation of β1LAR. This study investigated whether heterologous amino acids of the fifth transmembrane domain (TMDV) of β1AR and β2ARs contribute to β1LAR. β1ARs, β2ARs and mutant
β1ARs containing all (β1/β2TMDVAR) or single amino acids of TMDV of the β2AR were prepared and stably expressed in Chinese Hamster Ovary cells. Concentration- effect curves for cyclic AMP accumulation were carried out for (-)-CGP 12177 or (-)-isoprenaline in the absence and presence of (-)-bupranolol.
The potencies (pEC50) of (-)-CGP 12177 and affinities (pKB) of (-)-bupranolol versus (-)-CGP 12177 were:
Cell Line pEC50 (-)-CGP 12177 n pKB (-)-bupranolol n
β2AR 9.10 ± 0.18 14 9.31 ± 0.16 7
β1(V230I)AR 9.08 ± 0.07 10 7.64 ± 0.12 8
β1/β2TMDVAR 8.90 ± 0.10 15 8.06 ± 0.17 8
β1(R222Q)AR 8.10 ± 0.10 6 7.33 ± 0.23 5
β1AR 7.96 ± 0.09 14 7.20 ± 0.16 8
The potency of (-)-CGP 12177 was higher at β2AR than at β1AR, consistent with activation through a low-affinity site at the β1AR (β1LAR). The presence of valine at position 230 in β1AR accounted for the lower potency of (-)-CGP 12177.
The affinity of (-)-bupranolol was lower at β1AR compared to β2AR. The presence of valine 230 in β1AR accounted in part for the lower affinity. In conclusion, TMDV and valine 230 of the β1AR contribute in part to the low-affinity binding site of
β1AR.
iii
Table of Contents
Keywords ...... i Abstract ...... ii Table of Contents ...... iv List of Figures ...... vi List of Tables ...... ix List of Abbreviations ...... x Statement of Original Authorship ...... xiii Publications and Conference Abstracts ...... xiv Acknowledgements ...... xv CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION ...... 1 CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW ...... 5 2.1 G-Protein Coupled Receptors ...... 5 2.2 -Adrenoceptors ...... 6 2.2.1 1AR Gene and Protein Structure ...... 7
2.3 Structural Components of the 1AR ...... 9 2.3.1 N-Terminus and Extracellular Loops ...... 9 2.3.2 Transmembrane Domain Regions and 1AR Ligand Binding Pocket ...... 10 2.3.3 Intracellular Loops and G-Protein Binding ...... 13 2.4 GPCR Signalling and Activation ...... 15 2.4.1 1AR Activation ...... 16 2.4.2 1AR Signalling ...... 21 2.5 AR Signalling in the Human Heart ...... 23 2.5.1 The Role of1AR in Heart Failure ...... 27
2.6 1LAR Pharmacology ...... 31 2.6.1 Mechanistic Studies Into the Pharmacology of 1LAR ...... 32 2.6.2 The Putative β4-Adrenoceptor: A Working Hypothesis ...... 33 2.6.3 Proposal of a Low-Affinity Form of the β1-Adrenoceptor ...... 35 2.6.4 Pharmacological Differences Between the Putative β4-Adrenoceptor and Low- Affinity β1-Adrenoceptor ...... 37 2.6.5 The Underlying Role of β1-Adrenoceptors in Putative β4-Adrenoceptor Pharmacology ...... 38 2.6.6 Structural Implications of High and Low-Affinity Binding of Non-Conventional Partial Agonists to β1-Adrenoceptors ...... 39 2.6.7 Functional and Clinical Implication of the β1L-Adrenoceptor ...... 41 2.7 Summary and Implications ...... 43 CHAPTER 3: MATERIALS AND METHODS ...... 45 3.1 Research Design ...... 45 3.2 materials and Methods ...... 47 3.2.1 General Reagents ...... 47 3.2.2 General Methods ...... 50 3.2.3 Radioligand Binding Experiments ...... 58 3.2.4 Cyclic AMP Enzyme Immunoassays ...... 62 3.2.5 Tissue Bath Experiments ...... 67
iv
CHAPTER 4: HUMAN ATRIAL 1L-ADRENOCEPTOR BUT NOT 3-ADRENOCEPTOR ACTIVATION INCREASES FORCE AND Ca2+ CURRENT AT PHYSIOLOGICAL TEMPERATURE ...... 71 4.1 Introduction ...... 71 4.2 Results ...... 74 4.2.1 Patients ...... 74 4.2.2 Antagonism of the Inotropic Effects of BRL 37344 by the 1AR/2AR Antagonist Nadolol, 2AR Antagonist ICI 118,551 but not 3AR Antagonist L-748,337 in Atrial Trabeculae...... 75 4.2.3 The 3AR Agonist SR 58611 does not Increase Contractile Force...... 78 4.2.4 Stable (-)-CGP 12177-Evoked Contractions are Decreased by (-)-Bupranolol but not by L-748,337...... 79 4.2.5 L-748,337 does not Modify the Contractile Potency of (-)-CGP 12177...... 81 4.2.6 ICa-L Responses to SR 58611, BRL 37344, and (-)-CGP 12177 at 24°C...... 82 4.2.7 BRL 37344 and SR 58611 do not Increase ICa-L at 37°C...... 84 4.2.8 Antagonism of (-)-CGP 12177-Evoked ICa-L Increases by (-)-Bupranolol but not by L-748,337 at 37C ...... 84 4.2.9 SR 58611 does not Increase Atrial Force at 24C...... 86 4.2.10 (-)-CGP 12177-Evoked Increases in Atrial Force at 24°C are Antagonised by (-)-Bupranolol but not by L-748,337...... 86 4.3 Discussion ...... 88 CHAPTER 5: CONTRIBUTION OF TRANSMEMBRANE DOMAIN V OF THE 1-ADRENOCEPTOR TO 1L-ADRENOCEPTOR PHARMACOLOGY ...... 95 5.1 Introduction ...... 95 5.2 Results ...... 97 5.2.1 Characterisation and Validation of Wild-type and Mutant βARs Expressed in CHOAA8 Cells...... 97 5.2.2 Cyclic AMP Responses to (-)-CGP 12177 and (-)-Isoprenaline at 1AR, 2AR and 1/2TMDVAR in CHOAA8 cells...... 109 5.2.3 Cyclic AMP Responses to (-)-CGP 12177 and (-)-Isoprenaline at Heterologous Point Mutations of 1-2AR TMDV...... 119 5.2.4 Cyclic AMP Responses to (-)-CGP 12177 and (-)-Isoprenaline at Homologous Serine Residues of 1AR, 2AR TMDV...... 125 5.3 Discussion ...... 129 CHAPTER 6: PHARMACOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF 5-[3-(TERT-BUTYLAMINO))2- HYDROXYPROPOXY]1,3-DIHYDRO-2H-BENZIMIDAZOL-2-ONE ...... 137 6.1 Introduction ...... 137 6.2 Results ...... 139 6.2.1 Competition Binding ...... 139 6.2.2 Cyclic AMP Experiments ...... 139 6.3 Discussion ...... 142 CHAPTER 7: GENERAL DISCUSSION AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS ...... 145 BIBLIOGRAPHY ...... 151 APPENDICES ...... 179 Appendix A Table of Chemical Structures ...... 179 Appendix B British Journal of Pharmacology Publication ...... 181 Appendix C Molecular Modelling ...... 198
v
List of Figures
Figure 2.1. Two-dimensional diagram of the human 1AR adapted from the turkey 1AR-m23 model...... 8
Figure 2.2. The ligand binding pocket of β1AR-m23, displaying the amino acids interacting with cyanopindolol...... 11
Figure 2.3. The ligand binding pockets of 2AR with carazolol, 1AR with cyanopindolol and 1AR with isoprenaline...... 17
Figure 2.4. Comparison of the 1AR-m23 structures with either cyanopindolol or isoprenaline...... 18
Figure 2.5. Comparison of the inactive carazolol bound β2AR with the Nb80 stabilised β2AR and the active β2AR-Gs structure...... 20 Figure 2.6. Schematic representation of main βAR signal transduction pathways in cardiac sympathetic nervous transmission...... 24 Figure 2.7. The effects of the βAR-Gs-protein-adenylyl cyclase-cAMP-protein kinase A pathway in human heart...... 26 Figure 2.8. The correlation between the potencies (pD2) and affinities (pKa) of partial agonists on isolated heart preparations...... 32 Figure 2.9. The biphasic activity of CGP 12177...... 36 Figure 2.10. Polygraph traces comparing the effects (-)-CGP 12177 on left atrium from β2AR knockout and β1AR/β2AR double knockout mice...... 39 Figure 2.11. Chemical structures of (-)-CGP 12177 and (-)-pindolol...... 43 Figure 3.1. Structural considerations of -blockers with different agonist activity at
1LAR...... 46
Figure 3.2. The 1/2TMDVAR chimera...... 53 Figure 3.3. The cAMP EIA assay plate...... 64 Figure 3.4. The cAMP EIA reaction...... 65
Figure 4.1. Mediation of the positive inotropic effects of BRL 37344 through 1-and 2ARs but not 3ARs in human atrial trabeculae...... 75
Figure 4.2. Mediation of the positive inotropic effects of BRL 37344 through 1-and 2ARs in human atrial trabeculae...... 76 Figure 4.3. Lack of inotropic effects of BRL 37344 at 24°C in human atrial trabeculae...... 76 Figure 4.4. Lack of positive inotropic effects of SR 58611 at 37 ºC in human atrial trabeculae...... 78 Figure 4.5. Lack of positive inotropic effects of SR 58611 at 24ºC in human atrial trabeculae...... 79 Figure 4.6. Mediation of the positive inotropic effects of (-)-CGP 12177 through β1LAR but not β3AR...... 80 Figure 4.7. A comparison of the contractile force obtained in the presence of 200 nM (-)-CGP 12177 and after incubation of L-748,337, (-)-bupranolol or control...... 81
vi
Figure 4.8. L-748,337 does not change the inotropic potency of (-)-CGP 12177 in the presence of nadolol (200 nM) and IBMX (10 M)...... 82
Figure 4.9. L-748,337(1 µM) prevents small ICa-L responses to SR 58611 (1 µM) and BRL 37344 (1 µM) but not to (-)-CGP 12177 (1 µM) at 24ºC in the presence of nadolol (200 nM)...... 83 Figure 4.10. SR 58611 (1 µM) and BRL 37344 (1 µM), in the presence of nadolol (200 nM) failed to increase ICa-L in the absence and presence of IBMX (10 µM) at 37ºC...... 84
Figure 4.11. (-)-CGP 12177 (1 µM) causes small increases of ICa-L at 37ºC, compared to (-)-isoprenaline (1 µM), in the presence but not absence of IBMX (10 µM) that are prevented by (-)-bupranolol (10 µM) but not by L-748,337 (1µM) ICI 118,551 (50 nM) or nadolol (200 nM)...... 85 Figure 4.12. Inotropic effects of (-)-CGP 12177 at 24ºC...... 87 Figure 4.13. (-)-CGP 12177 causes positive inotropic effects in the presence of both (-)-propranolol (200 nM) and IBMX (10 µM) through β1LAR but not β3AR...... 87 Figure 5.1. Saturation binding studies performed using (-)-[3H]-CGP 12177 on purified membranes from CHOAA8 cells expressing wild-type β1AR and 1/2TMDVAR...... 99 Figure 5.2. Saturation binding performed using (-)-[3H]-CGP 12177 on purified membranes from CHOAA8 cells expressing β1(S228A)AR and β1(S229A)AR ...... 100 Figure 5.3. Competition binding between CGP 20712A or ICI 118,551 graph A, 3 (-)-bupranolol or bisoprolol graph B and (-)-[ H]-CGP 12177 at 1AR...... 103 Figure 5.4. Competition binding between CGP 20712A or ICI 118,551 graph A, 3 (-)-bupranolol or bisoprolol graph B and (-)-[ H]-CGP 12177 at 2AR...... 104 Figure 5.5. Competition binding between CGP 20712A or ICI 118,551 graph A, (-)-bupranolol or bisoprolol graph B and (-)-[3H]-CGP 12177 at
1/2TMDVAR ...... 105 Figure 5.6. Competition binding between CGP 20712A or ICI 118,551 at 3 1(V230I)AR graph A, 1(V230A)AR graph B and (-)-[ H]-CGP 12177...... 106 Figure 5.7. Competition binding between CGP 20712A or ICI 118,551 at 3 1(R222Q)AR graph A, 1(S228A)AR graph B and (-)-[ H]-CGP 12177...... 107 Figure 5.8. Competition binding between CGP 20712A or ICI 118,551 at 3 1(S229A)AR graph A, 1(S232A)AR graph B and (-)-[ H]-CGP 12177...... 108 Figure 5.9. Concentration-effect curves for cAMP accumulation in CHOAA8 cells
stably expressing 1AR in response to (-)-CGP 12177 and (-)-isoprenaline...... 111 Figure 5.10. Concentration-relationship (A) and concentration-effect curve (B) for
cAMP accumulation in CHOAA8 cells stably expressing 2AR in response to (-)-CGP 12177 and (-)-isoprenaline...... 112 Figure 5.11. Concentration-effect curves for cAMP accumulation in CHOAA8 cells
stably expressing 2AR at high density in response to (-)-CGP 12177 and (-)-isoprenaline...... 113 Figure 5.12. Concentration-effect curves for cAMP accumulation in CHOAA8 cells
stably expressing 1/2TMDVAR in response to (-)-CGP 12177 and (-)- isoprenaline...... 114
vii
Figure 5.13. Concentration-effect curves for cAMP accumulation in CHOAA8 cells
stably expressing 1AR in response to (-)-CGP 12177 and (-)-isoprenaline in the absence and presence of 100 nM (-)-bupranolol...... 116 Figure 5.14. Concentration-effect curve for cAMP accumulation in CHOAA8 cells
stably expressing 2AR in response to (-)-CGP 12177 in the absence and presence of 100 nM (-)-bupranolol...... 117 Figure 5.15. Concentration-effect curves for cAMP accumulation in CHOAA8 cells
stably expressing 1/2TMDVAR in response to (-)-CGP 12177 and (-)- isoprenaline in the absence and presence of 100 nM (-)-bupranolol...... 118
Figure 5.16. Homology model of the 1AR ...... 119 Figure 5.17. Concentration-effect curves for cAMP accumulation in CHOAA8 cells
stably expressing 1(R222Q)AR in response to (-)-CGP 12177 and (-)- isoprenaline in the absence and presence of 100 nM (-)-bupranolol...... 121 Figure 5.18. Concentration-effect curves for cAMP accumulation in CHOAA8 cells
stably expressing 1(V230I)AR in response to (-)-CGP 12177 and (-)- isoprenaline in the absence and presence of 100 nM (-)-bupranolol...... 122 Figure 5.19. Concentration-effect curves for cAMP accumulation in CHOAA8 cells
stably expressing 1(V230A)AR in response to (-)-CGP 12177 and (-)- isoprenaline in the absence and presence of 100 nM (-)-bupranolol...... 124 Figure 5.20. Concentration effect curves for cAMP accumulation in CHOAA8 cells
stably expressing 1(S228A)AR in response to (-)-CGP 12177 and (-)- isoprenaline in the absence and presence of 100 nM (-)-bupranolol...... 126 Figure 5.21. Concentration-effect curves for cAMP accumulation in CHOAA8 cells
stably expressing 1(S229A)AR in response to (-)-CGP 12177 and (-)- isoprenaline in the absence and presence of 100 nM (-)-bupranolol...... 127 Figure 5.22. Concentration-effect curves for cAMP accumulation in CHOAA8 cells
stably expressing 1(S232A)AR in response to (-)-CGP 12177 and (-)- isoprenaline in the absence and presence of 10 nM (-)-bupranolol...... 128
Figure 5.23. Overlay of TMDV regions of the 1AR homology model, inactive β2AR- T4L bound to carazolol and nanobody stabilised active β2AR ...... 133 Figure 6.1. Two possible alignments of the common features of noradrenaline and (-)- CGP 12177...... 138 Figure 6.2. Chemical structure of (-)-CGP 12177 and its structural isomer 5-[3-(tert- butylamino))2-hydroxypropoxy]1,3-dihydro-2H-benzimidazol-2-one...... 138 Figure 6.3. Concentration-effect relationship for cAMP accumulation in CHOAA8
cells stably expressing 1AR in response to 5-[3-(tert-butylamino))2- hydroxypropoxy]1,3-dihydro-2H-benzimidazol-2-one...... 140 Figure 6.4. Concentration-effect curves for cAMP accumulation in CHOAA8 cells
stably expressing 1AR in response to (-)-isoprenaline in the absence and presence of 1 M 5-[3-(tert-butylamino))2-hydroxypropoxy]1,3-dihydro- 2H-benzimidazol-2-one...... 141 Figure 6.5. Concentration-effect curves for cAMP accumulation in CHOAA8 cells
stably expressing 1AR in response to (-)-CGP 12177 in the absence and presence of 10 M 5-[3-(tert-butylamino))2-hydroxypropoxy]1,3-dihydro- 2H-benzimidazol-2-one...... 141
viii
List of Tables
Table 3.1 Primers Used to Generate 1AR Mutations ...... 53 Table 4.1 Patient Demographics ...... 74 Table 4.2 Effects of Antagonists on the Inotropic Potency of BRL 37344 in the Presence of IBMX (10 M) ...... 77 3 Table 5.1 Affinity Values of (-)-[ H]-CGP 12177 (pKD) and Receptor Densities (Bmax) for ARs Stably Expressed in CHOAA8 Cells ...... 98 Table 5.2 Affinity Values (pKi) of AR Antagonists used in Competition Binding Experiments ...... 102
Table 5.3 Potencies (pEC50) of (-)-Isoprenaline (1HAR), (-)-CGP 12177 (1LAR) and (-)-Bupranolol Affinity Values (pKB) for ARs Expressed in CHOAA8 Cells ...... 110 Table 5.4 Analogous AR Amino Acids at Different AR Structures That Interact at the TMDV-TMDVI Interface ...... 132
ix
List of Abbreviations
AC adenylyl cyclase
ATP adenosine 5-triphosphate
MEM Alpha Modified minimal essential medium
ASCEPT Australasian Society of Clinical and Experimental Pharmacologists and Toxicologists
1AR 1-adrenoceptor
2AR 2-adrenoceptor
3AR 3-adrenoceptor
1LAR low-affinity 1-adrenoceptor
1HAR high-affinity 1-adrenoceptor
1/2TMDVAR 1-adrenoceptor containing transmembrane domain V of the
2-adrenoceptor
β1AR-m23 modified turkey β1-adrenoceptor
β2AR-T4L modified human β2-adrenoceptor
BRL 37344 (RR+SS)[4-[2-[[2-(3-chlorophenyl)-2-hydroxy-ethyl]amino] propyl]phenoxy]acetic acid
CAMKII calmodulin-dependent protein kinase cAMP cyclic AMP
CGP 12177 4-[3-(tert-butylamino))2-hydroxypropoxy]1,3-dihydro-2H- benzimidazol-2-one
CGP 20712A 2-hydroxy-S-[2-[[2-hydroxy-3-[4-[methyl-4-(trifluoromethyl)- 1H-imidazol-2-yl]phenoxy]propyl]amino]ethoxy]-benzamide
CHOAA8 Chinese Hamster Ovary cell line that expresses the tetracycline-controlled transactivator
DMEM Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium
x
DRY motif aspartic acid-arginine-tyrosine motif
ECL/EL extracellular loop
EIA enzyme immunoassay
GDP guanosine 5-diphosphate
GPCR G-protein coupled receptor
GTP guanosine 5-triphosphate
Gi inhibitory G protein for adenylyl cyclase
Gs stimulatory G protein for adenylyl cyclase
IBMX 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine
2+ ICa-L L-type Ca current
ICL intracellular loop
ICI 118,551 1-[2,3-dihydro-7-methyl-1H-inden-4-yl]oxy-3-[(1- methylethyl) amino-2-butanol)]
L-748,337 N-(3-[3-[2-(4-benzenesulphonylamino phenyl)ethylamino]-2- hydroxypropoxy]benzyl acetamide
PDE phosphodiesterase enzyme
SR 58611 ethyl{(7S)-7-[(2R)-2-(3-chlorophenyl)-2-hydroxyethylamino]- 5,6,7,8-tetrahydronaphtyl2-yloxy} acetate hydrochloride pEC50 -log molar concentration of agonist required to produce half maximal response
PI3K phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase
PKA cAMP-dependent protein kinase
PKB protein kinase B pKB -log molar concentration of antagonist which at equilibrium would occupy 50% of receptors in the absence of agonist pKD -log molar equilibrium dissociation constant for a radioligand pKi -log molar binding inhibition constant
xi
RyR2 sarcoplasmic reticulum ryanodine channel
TMD transmembrane domain
S.E.M standard error of the mean
xii
Statement of Original Authorship
The work contained in this thesis has not been previously submitted to meet requirements for an award at this or any other higher education institution. To the best of my knowledge and belief, the thesis contains no material previously published or written by another person except where due reference is made.
Signature: ______
Date: ______
xiii
Publications and Conference Abstracts
Christ T, Molenaar P, Klenowski PM, Ravens U, Kaumann AJ (2011). Human atrial beta(1L)-adrenoceptor but not beta-adrenoceptor activation increases force and Ca(2+) current at physiological temperature. Br J Pharmacol 162(4): 823-839.
Klenowski P, Semmler ABT, Chee K, Iconomou M, Molenaar P (2010).
Contribution of transmembrane domain V amino acids to β1L-adrenoceptor activity and affinity. ASCEPT and Molecular Pharmacology of G-Protein Coupled Receptors Meeting Melbourne.
Molenaar P, Klenowski P, Semmler AB, Chee K, Iconomou M, Tugiono N, Kiriazis
H, Du XJ, Ravens U, Christ T, Kaumann A (2010). The highs (1H) and lows (1L) of human heart 1-adrenoceptors (AR). ASCEPT and Carney Symposium Christchurch.
Molenaar P, Klenowski P, Kaumann AJ (2009). (-)-CGP12177 increases contractile force through β1L-adrenoceptors but not through β3-adrenoceptors in human right atrial myocardium. ASCEPT Sydney.
Klenowski P, Semmler A, Mälzer A, Wei M, Kaumann A, Molenaar P (2008)
Transmembrane spanning domain 5 (TMD5) of the 1-adrenoceptor (1AR) is required for the formation of the ‘low affinity state’. Molecular Pharmacology of G- Protein Coupled Receptors Meeting Sydney.
xiv
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by an APA/IHBI postgraduate student award and a NHMRC grant awarded to Assoc. Prof. Peter Molenaar.
Firstly, I would like to thank my supervisors, Assoc. Prof. Peter Molenaar and Dr Annalese Semmler for their guidance, support and encouragement throughout my candidature. I would also like to thank the past and present members of the Molecular Human Cardiac Pharmacology Group, and in particular, Kelly Chee for her hardwork and assistance with experiments.
I am most grateful to the heart surgeons of The Prince Charles Hospital for providing right atrial appendages, and to Prof. Malcolm West and Assoc. Prof. Ian Yang of the School of Medicine, University of Queensland, to carry out experiments in the in vitro human heart laboratory.
I would also like to acknowledge the lab’s collaborators Prof. David Fairlie (UQ), Dr Andrew Lucke (UQ), Dr Robert Reid (UQ), Dr Torsten Christ (Dresden University) and Prof. Alberto Kaumann (University of Cambridge) for their valuable contribution to this research project.
My thanks also to the members of IHBI for their help and friendly attitude, and to Prof. Ross Young for use of IHBI facilities to carry out molecular pharmacology experiments
Lastly, but by no means least, I would like to thank my family and friends (particularly my Mother, Father and Brother) for their love, encouragement and prayers. Your support, generosity, comfort and guidance has given me the strength to complete this great challenge.
xv
Chapter 1: Introduction
The 1-adrenoceptor (1AR) is activated by (-)-noradrenaline and blocked by all clinically used -blockers. Some -blockers, typified by (-)-CGP 12177 and
(-)-pindolol not only block the 1AR, but also activate it at higher concentrations (~2-3 orders of magnitude) than those required to block it (reviewed Kaumann et al., 2008). To accommodate these findings, it was hypothesised that -blockers such as
(-)-CGP 12177 and (-)-pindolol bind to the 1AR at two different sites, one that blocks (-)-noradrenaline from activating the receptor, the 1H site and another which activates the receptor, the 1L site. Other -blockers typically block 1H- with ~2-3 orders of magnitude higher affinity than 1LAR (Kaumann et al., 2008).
The physiological manifestations of the 1LAR were originally observed in the heart where (-)-pindolol and related indoleamines, (-)-CGP 12177 and other -blockers such as oxprenolol and (-)-alprenolol caused cardiostimulant effects resistant to blockade by propranolol and bisoprolol but which were blocked by moderately low (1 M) concentrations of (-)-bupranolol (reviewed Kaumann et al.,
2008). 1LAR mediated agonist effects were subsequently observed in adipose (Granneman et al., 1992; Sennitt et al., 1998) and smooth muscle tissues (Oostendorp et al., 2000). Despite relative resistance of the cardiostimulant effects to (-)-CGP 12177 and like drugs to blockade by -blockers, notably complete resistance in the presence of 200 nM (-)-propranolol (Kaumann, 1996), a concentration that causes >60-fold rightward shift of noradrenaline effects in heart (Gille et al., 1985), a
1AR mechanism was authenticated in murine cardiac tissues where cardiostimulant effects were observed in tissues from 2AR knockout mice but not 1-/2AR knockout mice (Kaumann et al., 2001). Consistent findings were observed at recombinant 1AR where (-)-CGP 12177 exhibited antagonist properties at low concentrations, but agonist effects at higher concentrations (Pak et al., 1996), and other antagonists displayed a characteristic 2-3 orders of magnitude difference of
Chapter 1 1
affinity against noradrenaline/isoprenaline versus (-)-CGP 12177/(-)-pindolol (reviewed Kaumann et al., 2008).
A recent report claimed that (-)-CGP 12177 increased L-type Ca2+ current
(ICa-L) and contractile force via activation of 3-adrenoceptors (3AR) (Skeberdis et al., 2008). As observed previously with the non-selective phosphodiesterase (PDE) inhibitor 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine (IBMX) (Kaumann et al., 1997c) and PDE3- selective inhibitor cilostamide (Kaumann et al., 2007), Skeberdis et al., (2008) observed a marked increase of the contractile responses to (-)-CGP 12177 in the presence of IBMX, in human atrium. However, they interpreted the effects of
(-)-CGP 12177 to be mediated through activation of 3AR. Skeberdis et al., (2008) based the interpretation of their results from human atrial myocytes in which (-)-CGP
12177 increased ICa-L, an effect blocked by the 3AR-selective antagonist L-748,337 (Candelore et al., 1999). However, they did not verify with L-748,337 their claim that the contractile effects of (-)-CGP 12177 are mediated through 3AR (Skeberdis et al., 2008).
The interpretation of Skeberdis et al., (2008) challenged the fundamental hypothesis used as a basis for this PhD project, that the agonist properties of (-)-CGP 12177 and other non-conventional partial agonists are mediated through
1LAR (Joseph et al., 2003; Kaumann et al., 2007; Kaumann et al., 2008; Sarsero et al., 2003). It has been shown previously in human atrial trabeculae that L-748,337 failed to antagonise the positive inotropic effects of the non-conventional partial agonist (-)-pindolol mediated through 1LAR (Joseph et al., 2003). Therefore experiments were performed during the undertaking of this PhD project to investigate whether L-748,337 could antagonise the inotropic effects of (-)-CGP 12177 on human atrial preparations under the conditions of Skeberdis et al., (2008), using IBMX. In addition, concentration-effect curves to (-)-CGP 12177 in the absence and presence of (-)-bupranolol were determined. Evidence from these experiments ruled out an involvement of 3AR and confirmed previous work on human atrial myocardium (Kaumann, 1996; Sarsero et al., 2003), and recombinant
2 Chapter 1
1AR (Joseph et al., 2004b), that showed that the inotropic effects of (-)-CGP 12177 are mediated through 1LAR.
Having confirmed the original hypothesis of this project, the remaining work focused on identifying the molecular and structural determinants of the 1LAR. The molecular features of the 1AR that differentiate between the 1H- and 1LAR forms are poorly understood. Mutagenesis studies have provided conflicting results with respect to amino acids required for 1LAR activity. Amino acids critical at 1HAR have been investigated to determine their involvement in 1LAR pharmacology (Baker et al., 2008). This has revealed that Asp138 in transmembrane domain III (TMDIII) and Asn363 (TMDVI) are required for binding and agonist activity at both
1H- and 1LAR, whilst Ser228 and Ser229 of TMDV contribute to agonist
[(-)-CGP 12177] potency at 1LAR (Baker et al., 2008). It is proposed that an interaction between a nitrogen atom of the indole group of (-)-pindolol and one of the
TMDV serines may contribute to 1LAR activity (Baker et al., 2008; Warne et al.,
2008). The serine residues are also important for catecholamine binding to 1HAR, leading to the suggestion that the 1L- and 1H binding sites must overlap (Baker et al., 2008). Interestingly, the proposed involvement of Asp138 at 1LAR is in contrast to that reported previously (Joseph et al., 2004a), which proposed an involvement of
Asp138 in binding of (-)-CGP 12177 at 1HAR but not 1LAR.
The TMDV region of the 1AR is a critical anchor point for the catechol groups of catecholamines (Rasmussen et al., 2007; Sato et al., 1999; Strader et al.,
1989b; Sugimoto et al., 2002; Warne et al., 2008). The turkey 1AR crystal structure reveals that the catechol hydroxyl groups of (-)-isoprenaline are likely to interact with Ser211 and Ser215 in TMDV. For antagonist activity at 1HAR, cyanopindolol appears to bind in a similar pocket to that occupied by catecholamines such as (-)-isoprenaline, to interdict catecholamine agonist activity (Warne et al., 2011; Warne et al., 2008). The benzimidazolone and indole groups of (-)-CGP 12177 and
(-)-pindolol play a critical role in 1LAR agonist activity (Kaumann et al., 2008), however the binding partners of these groups to the 1LAR are still speculative.
Chapter 1 3
The interactions formed upon ligand binding to the 1AR also influences intramolecular TMD interactions. These effects can cause movement of the TMD regions and may contribute to the stabilisation of inactive and active receptor conformations (Rasmussen et al., 2011a; Rasmussen et al., 2011b; Warne et al., 2011). Consequently, amino acids within TMDV that are remote to the binding pocket may also contribute to the formation of 1LAR via steric/stabilising interactions. Because the 2AR does not form a corresponding low-affinity state (Baker et al., 2002), heterologous amino acids within TMDV were targeted to determine their involvement in binding at 1AR, and their potential involvement in
1LAR activity. Initially, a conservative approach was adopted that examined TMDV as a whole entity. It was hypothesised that if TMDV contributes to 1LAR agonist activity, a chimeric 1AR which incorporates the 2AR TMDV would not display characteristic 1LAR pharmacology. Site-directed mutagenesis was used to generate a chimeric 1AR that contained the TMDV region of 2AR. The functionality of this receptor was tested using radioligand binding studies and cAMP enzyme immunoassays (EIA). Based on these data and results obtained from molecular modelling, individual amino acids within this region were identified and investigated using the above mentioned techniques, to determine their involvement at the 1LAR.
4 Chapter 1
Chapter 2: Literature Review
2.1 G-PROTEIN COUPLED RECEPTORS
GPCRs have a conserved structure that consists of seven helical transmembrane spanning domains, an extracellular N terminus, an intracellular C terminus and three interhelical loops on either side of the membrane. This structure provides a link that allows extracellular molecules to activate intracellular signal transduction pathways without crossing the plasma membrane (Oldham et al., 2008). GPCRs are activated by a diverse range of endogenous ligands including neurotransmitters, inflammatory mediators, hormones, odorants, peptides and enzymes. Upon activation, GPCRs undergo a conformational change that promotes the transfer of GDP for GTP to the -subunit of heterotrimeric GTP binding proteins (G-proteins). This causes the dissociation of the coupled G-protein which splits into , and subunits. The individual subunits then interact with intracellular proteins, leading to subsequent downstream signalling and modulation of various cellular responses involved in autonomic nervous system transmission, cell homeostasis and cell growth (Deupi et al., 2007; Oldham et al., 2008).
The GPCR superfamily consists of approximately 800 members which have been broadly classified into 5 subfamilies (A,B,C,D and E) based on sequence homology and function (Kobilka, 2007). The rhodopsin-like class A subfamily is the largest comprising approximately 85% of all GPCRs. The development of compounds that block or activate GPCRs has provided an important field of research and therapeutic strategy. While nearly 30% of all commercially available medicines mediate their therapeutic effects through GCPRs, there remains an enormous scope for further research considering these drugs are targeted against a small percentage of the receptor family (Landry et al., 2008; Leach et al., 2007; Overington et al., 2006).
Chapter 2 5
2.2 -ADRENOCEPTORS
Adrenoceptors (AR) are members of the class A GPCR subfamily. Their expression and activation is mediated by the biogenic amines, noradrenaline and adrenaline. Since the subdivision of adrenoceptors into - and - (Ahlquist, 1948), the study of βARs has remained an active field of research. Early investigations into the physiological and pharmacological properties of βARs using a series of structurally related catecholamines resulted in further subdivision into β1AR, β2AR
(Lands et al., 1967a; Lands et al., 1967b) and β3AR (Emorine et al., 1989).
In humans all three members of the βAR subtype are widely and heterogeneously distributed throughout the body in cardiac, skeletal and smooth muscle, neuronal, endocrine and adipose tissues (Brodde et al., 1984; Carstairs et al., 1985; Golf et al., 1985; Heitz et al., 1983; Kaumann et al., 1987; Langin et al., 1991; Lemoine et al., 1988; Liggett et al., 1988; Minneman et al., 1979). Multiple βARs subtypes often contribute to the overall βAR activity within a specific region (Carlsson et al., 1972). Upon activation all three receptors can cause intracellular levels of cAMP to increase via the protein kinase A (PKA)/cAMP signalling pathway (Galandrin et al., 2006; Lefkowitz et al., 2002), although studies have also revealed regulation of other intracellular effectors and signalling pathways including phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (Leblais et al., 2004), c-Src (Luttrell et al., 1999; Schmitt et al., 2002), Erk 1/2 (Gerhardt et al., 1999; Lindquist et al., 2000; Sato et al., 2008; Soeder et al., 1999), p38 mitogen activated protein kinase (Cao et al., 2000; Gong et al., 2000; Sato et al., 2008; Zheng et al., 2000), Ca2+/calmodulin- dependent protein kinase II pathway (Wang et al., 2004) and the JAK/STAT pathway (Westphal et al., 2008). In the heart, the effects of the sympathetic nervous system are mainly mediated through activation of 1AR (Gilman, 1987; Katz et al.,
1975). Activation of 1AR in heart results in an elevation of cAMP levels, increased PKA activity and phosphorylation of target proteins including L-type Ca2+ channels, phospholamban, troponin I and C-protein which enhance contractility and hastens relaxation (Kaumann et al., 1999; Kaumann et al., 1996b; Molenaar et al., 2000; Molenaar et al., 2007b). Increased cAMP in the sinoatrial node hastens the action potential to cause an increase in heart rate and conduction (Gilman, 1987; Katz et al., 1975).
6 Chapter 2
2.2.1 1AR Gene and Protein Structure
The gene encoding human β1AR is localised on chromosome 10 (Yang-Feng et al., 1990) and was first cloned in 1987 (Frielle et al., 1987). The 2.4 kbp sequence contains a short 5’ untranslated region of 86 bp, a single exon of 1434 bp and an 3’ non-coding region of ~900 bp (Frielle et al., 1987). Within the exon, there are two common naturally occurring variations observed at positions 49 (Ser/Gly) (Borjesson et al., 2000; Maqbool et al., 1999) and 389 (Arg/Gly) (Maqbool et al., 1999; Mason et al., 1999; Tesson et al., 1999). There are a further 24 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) reported in the population, 11 of which are non-synonymous (Brodde, 2008).
The human β1AR exon encodes a 477 amino acid protein (Figure 2.1). There is a high degree of amino acid sequence homology between the receptor subtypes with
β1- and β2ARs sharing 48.9% homology, while β3AR exhibits 50.7% and 45.5% with
β1AR and β2AR respectively (Emorine et al., 1989). β1AR and β2AR exhibit the highest degree of homology within the TMD regions (71%) (Frielle et al., 1988). The
β1AR protein exhibits the typical GPCR structure containing seven hydrophobic transmembrane -helices connected by hydrophilic extracellular and intracellular loops (Figure 2.1). Within the protein structure, important amino acids involved in ligand binding and G-protein coupling have been identified (Sato et al., 1999; Strader et al., 1989b; Strader et al., 1988; Strader et al., 1987b). This work, performed initially in the β2AR has since been confirmed in the homologous β1AR amino acid residues (Baker et al., 2008).
Chapter 2 7
Figure 2.1. Two-dimensional diagram of the human 1AR adapted from the turkey 1AR-m23 model.
8 Chapter 2
2.3 STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS OF THE 1AR
The β1AR exhibits the typical GPCR structure and provides a mechanism for signal transduction across the plasma membrane (Figure 2.1). In order to facilitate how the β1AR protein structure determines functionality, the important structural features and amino acids will be discussed.
2.3.1 N-Terminus and Extracellular Loops
The major roles of the β1AR N-terminus are in regulation of receptor levels as well as receptor trafficking to the plasma membrane. The β1AR is glycosylated on Asn15 (Frielle et al., 1987), a site that is implicated in receptor trafficking and dimerisation (He et al., 2002). Regulation of cell surface expression is also thought to occur through constitutive and agonist induced cleavage of the N-terminus at 2 sites, Arg31-Leu32 and Pro52-Leu53 (Hakalahti et al., 2010).
The recent publication of the human β2AR-T4 lysozyme fusion protein (β2AR-
T4L) and the modified turkey 1AR (1AR-m23) crystal structures has provided insights into the structural and functional roles of the extracellular loops (ECLs). In both β1AR and β2AR, ECL1 and ECL3 are short loops connecting TMDII and III and TMDVI and VII. ECL2 which connects TMDIV and V is much larger and is more exposed to the extracellular side (Figure 2.1). It is stabilised by two disulfide bonds and a sodium ion (Warne et al., 2008). Furthermore, ECL2 appears to provide an insight into the observed specificity of βAR ligands. ECL2 of the β2AR forms a short -helix that exists as a partial opening over the ligand binding pocket on the extracellular surface (Cherezov et al., 2007). This is in contrast to the corresponding loop in rhodopsin which is a -sheet that is buried in the transmembrane region and covers the ligand binding pocket. The opening created by ECL2 appears to act as an entrance to the binding pocket and is thought to be involved in the initial recognition of ligands and their binding kinetics (Avlani et al., 2007; Klco et al., 2005; Shi et al.,
2004; Warne et al., 2008). ECL2 in both β1AR and β2AR also forms part of the ligand binding site, by forming stabilising interactions with bound ligands. At β2AR, an aromatic interaction is formed between the inverse agonist carazolol and Phe193
Chapter 2 9
of ECL2 (Bokoch et al., 2010), while at the β1AR, Thr203 forms a hydrogen bond with cyanopindolol and Phe201 forms a van der Waals interaction (Warne et al.,
2008). While the backbone structure of the three β1AR ECLs are very similar to
β2AR (Warne et al., 2008), there are 22 amino acid differences between ECL2 and
ECL3 of β1AR compared to β2AR (Bokoch et al., 2010). It is proposed that the difference in amino acid side chains results in spatial and charge distribution differences that may contribute to the sub-type selectivity of β1AR and β2AR ligands (Bokoch et al., 2010).
2.3.2 Transmembrane Domain Regions and 1AR Ligand Binding Pocket The βAR ligand binding pocket is formed by the cylindrical arrangement of the seven hydrophobic transmembrane -helices within the plasma membrane. The specific interactions that occur between catecholamines and amino acid side chains within the TMD regions are well established. In the 1980s the 2AR served as the prototype GPCR for investigating binding mechanisms of endogenous ligands and blockers directly at the receptor. Site-directed mutagenesis and molecular modelling techniques were implemented, resulting in the identification of amino acids involved in catecholamine binding at the 2AR (Sato et al., 1999; Strader et al., 1989b; Strader et al., 1988; Strader et al., 1987b). These results suggested that the main + contact points between catecholamines and β2AR were the bioamine NH3 group with Asp113 in TMDIII, hydroxyl groups of the catechol ring with Ser203, Ser204 and Ser207 in TMDV, the aromatic ring with Phe290 in TMDVI and the chiral -hydroxyl with Asn293 in TMDVI. The recent publication of ARs in complex with antagonists and agonists, has provided further characterisation of the 1AR and
2AR binding sites. This structural information has provided a more authoritative view of the involvement of amino acids identified from mutagenesis studies and afforded a greater understanding of specific βAR ligand interactions.
At the 1AR-m23 crystal structure containing the antagonist cyanopindolol, a binding pocket is formed by 15 amino acid side chains from four different TMDs (III, IV, V and VII) and ECL2 (Figure 2.2). In comparison, the antagonist binding pocket of β2AR defined by carazolol is highly conserved considering there is only
10 Chapter 2
two amino acid differences within an 8 Å distance of the ligand (Thr164 in TMDIV and Tyr308 in TMDVII of β2AR, corresponding to Val172 and Phe325 of β1AR).
Additionally, the recent publication of agonist bound structures of β1AR-m23 has afforded comparison to the cyanopindolol bound structure. The overall structures and binding pockets are very similar (Warne et al., 2011), a result that was expected considering that the introduced point mutations stabilise the receptor preferentially in an inactive state.
Figure 2.2. The ligand binding pocket of β1AR-m23, displaying the amino acids (aquamarine, grey) interacting with cyanopindolol (yellow). H, helix, EL, extracellular loop. Figure from Warne et al., (2008).
The interactions between GPCRs and the ligands that bind to them result in conformational changes to the receptor. Agonists stabilise conformations that promote G-protein coupling leading to increased signal transduction. Antagonists stabilise conformations that reduce the level of G-protein coupling, while inverse agonists reduce basal and agonist independent levels of signal transduction. As a consequence, the amino acids within the binding pocket not only interact with ligands but also play a role in the functionality of the receptor by promoting conformational changes that affect signalling. Here the amino acids critical for ligand binding and their role with respect to βAR functionality will be discussed.
Chapter 2 11
Studies have demonstrated that in the 2AR, Asp79 within TMDII is required for agonist binding (Chung et al., 1988; Sato et al., 1999; Strader et al., 1988; Strader et al., 1987b; Sugimoto et al., 2002) and mutation of the equivalent Asp104 of the
β1AR does not affect agonist or antagonist affinity, but significantly alters Gs- protein coupling and cAMP signalling (Baker et al., 2008). Within TMDIII of β2AR, the side chain of Asp113 interacts with the positively charged protonated amine group of βAR ligands (Strader et al., 1988). Alteration of this residue dramatically decreases agonist potency and antagonist affinity. The homologous residue in the
β1AR, Asp138, is also essential for the binding of antagonists and the βAR agonist isoprenaline (Baker et al., 2008; Joseph et al., 2004b).
There are three conserved serine residues within TMDV of both β1AR and
β2AR which serve as an anchor point for the catechol groups of catecholamines. It was proposed that the hydroxyl side chains of Ser203 and Ser204 at β2AR interact with the meta-hydroxyl and Ser207 with the para-hydroxyl of (-)-isoprenaline (Sato et al., 1999; Strader et al., 1989b). The removal of Ser203 also reduced the affinity of antagonists containing a nitrogen in the heterocyclic ring (Liapakis et al., 2000).
Mutation of the analogous β1AR residues, Ser228, Ser229 and Ser232 resulted in reduced affinity and potency of isoprenaline (Baker et al., 2008). These residues are also involved in antagonist binding at the β1AR, although this result was antagonist dependent (Baker et al., 2008).
The Phe290 within TMDVI of the β2AR appears to form non-polar interactions with the aromatic ring of catecholamines (Swaminath et al., 2005). This residue is part of a cluster of highly conserved aromatic residues which surround the Proline- kink (Pro288) in TMDVI (Shi et al., 2002). It is proposed that these residues form a molecular switch known as the “rotamer toggle switch”, and that the interactions between the aromatic catechol ring of catecholamines, Phe290 and possibly other residues within the switch, alter the angle of the bend around the Pro288, resulting in movement of the cytoplasmic end of TMDVI upon receptor activation (Shi et al.,
2002). Analysis of the equivalent β1AR residue Phe341, suggests no significant
12 Chapter 2
functional role and variable effects with respect to antagonist binding (Baker et al., 2008).
The TMDVI residue Asn293 in β2AR appears to interact with the -hydroxyl group of catecholamines. Replacing Asn293 with leucine, caused a reduction in the affinity and potency of (-)-isoprenaline but not (+)-isoprenaline (Wieland et al., 1996). These results provided a rationale for the observed stereoselectivity for the (-)-enantiomer of catecholamines (Wieland et al., 1996). The affinity and potency of
(-)-isoprenaline was also reduced when the homologous β1AR residue Asn344 was changed to alanine (Baker et al., 2008). Mutagenesis studies have also demonstrated a functional role for the β1AR Lys324 residue in TMDVI. It is proposed that upon agonist binding, an interaction with Lys324 causes movement of TMDVI, inducing a GTP sensitive form of the receptor (Zeitoun et al., 2006). Mutation of the Lys324 to alanine, results in decreased potency of full and partial agonists (Zeitoun et al.,
2006). Finally, Asp363 within TMDVII of β1AR appears to interact with both agonists and antagonists since its mutation significantly reduces antagonist affinity and agonist potency (Baker et al., 2008).
2.3.3 Intracellular Loops and G-Protein Binding
The final structural components of the β1AR include the intracellular loops (ICLs) and the C-terminus. In βARs, ICL2 and ICL3 appear to play a role in receptor activation and the recognition of binding G-proteins (Dixon et al., 1987; Hausdorff et al., 1990; O'Dowd et al., 1988; Strader et al., 1987a). These receptor components also interact with -arrestins, which can regulate expression levels in both an agonist dependent and independent manner, by initiating receptor internalisation (Marion et al., 2006). While the underlying mechanism behind formation of GPCR-G-protein ternary complex has not been fully elucidated, evidence for direct contact of G- proteins within this region of the receptor does exist (Chung et al., 1988; Hausdorff et al., 1990; O'Dowd et al., 1988; Rasmussen et al., 2011b; Strader et al., 1987a).
Studies have identified a highly conserved triplet of amino acids located at the boundary between TMDIII and ICL2 in class A GPCRs. In the β2AR, the aspartic
Chapter 2 13
acid-arginine-tyrosine (DRY) motif has been implicated in the formation of an “ionic lock” that stabilises the receptor in an inactive conformation. It is proposed that the non-covalent intramolecular interactions supporting the formation of the “ionic lock” occur between Arg131 on the cytoplasmic end of TMDIII, the adjacent Asp130 and
Glu268 at the cytoplasmic end of TMDVI at 2AR (Ballesteros et al., 2001; Rasmussen et al., 1999). The mutation of these residues disrupts the interactions between TMDIII and TMDVI resulting in the β2AR becoming constitutively active (Ballesteros et al., 2001). Furthermore, agonists induce conformational changes at
β2AR that lead to disruption of the “ionic lock” interactions (Yao et al., 2006). The
1AR-m23 structure reveals that Tyr149 in ICL2 is close enough to interact with the
Asp138 (homologous to β2AR Asp130) via hydrogen bond formation, suggesting that this residue may also be involved in the formation of the ionic lock at the β1AR.
Elucidation of the contact points between GPCRs and G-proteins has proved difficult. One of the challenges researchers have faced is that altering areas of interest using mutagenesis has led to a reduction in agonist affinity at the receptor, thus reducing G-protein coupling efficiency. To alleviate this problem, studies using peptides and G-proteins have been performed to investigate these interactions (Wu et al., 2000). A drawback of this method could be that binding determinants that promote high-affinity G-protein binding may only be exposed when the receptor is in an agonist-induced active conformation. Studies have provided evidence to support the contact of G-proteins to ICL2 of the M1-muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (Moro et al., 1993), and ICL3 of the 2AR (Taylor et al., 1996), M2 and M3 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (Wu et al., 2000) and the β2AR (Cheung et al., 1992; Hausdorff et al., 1990; Strader et al., 1987a). Removal of residues 222-229 by deletion from the β2AR resulted in complete loss of coupling to adenylyl cyclase (Strader et al., 1987a), and the corresponding peptide was able to activate the Gs- protein (Okamoto et al., 1991). A mutant β2AR containing a seven amino acid deletion at the carboxyl terminus of its ICL3 exhibited a 50% reduction in adenylyl cyclase activity when exposed to agonist compared with the wild-type receptor, while agonist affinity was not affected (Hausdorff et al., 1990). Furthermore, mutation of the hydrophobic residues at the amino acid terminus of ICL3 significantly reduced isoprenaline mediated adenylyl cyclase activity, suggesting that
14 Chapter 2
the chemical composition of amino acid side chains within this region is critical for G-protein coupling (Cheung et al., 1992).
The recent publication of the β2AR-Gs-protein structure has provided further insights into β2AR-G-protein interactions. Although this structure displays the contact interface between the β2AR intracellular regions of TMDV, TMDVI and ICL2 with the Gs subunit, no direct interaction with G and G subunits was observed (Rasmussen et al., 2011b). This was somewhat surprising considering that the heterotrimeric G-protein is required for efficient coupling (Hekman et al., 1987; Ratnala et al., 2009). Nevertheless, G appeared to play an indirect role in coupling by stabilising the amino end of the -helix of Gs(Rasmussen et al., 2011b). A network of non-polar interactions is formed along the β2AR-Gs interface. Additionally, rearrangement of the cytoplasmic ends TMDV, TMDVI and ICL2 is observed, that accommodates the 5-helix of Gs subunit, causing a rearrangement of the interactions formed by the DRY motif(Rasmussen et al., 2011b).
2.4 GPCR SIGNALLING AND ACTIVATION
Over the last two decades, the understanding of GPCR activation and signalling has advanced considerably. This new knowledge has led to the realisation that the mechanisms underlying these processes are more complex than first thought. Numerous studies have explored these concepts using βARs. Here, the information pertaining to our current understanding, along with challenges facing researchers will be presented.
GPCR activation involves the binding of an agonist to the receptor, resulting in the formation of a ternary complex consisting of a ligand, the receptor and a G-protein (De Lean et al., 1980; Ross et al., 1977). This leads to the exchange of GDP for GTP to the G-protein -subunit, causing dissociation of the complex and of the heterotrimeric G-protein into the GTP- subunit and subunits. Both GTP-G and G interact with intracellular effector proteins that regulate signalling pathways. In order to determine the function of GPCRs at a molecular level, a fundamental
Chapter 2 15
understanding of how agonist binding results in receptor activation is required. Early studies proposed a two state kinetic model whereby agonist binding induces a conformational change that converts the receptor from an inactive state R to an active state R* (Bond et al., 1995; Chidiac et al., 1994; Gotze et al., 1994; Lefkowitz et al., 1993; Mewes et al., 1993; Monod et al., 1965; Samama et al., 1993; Samama et al., 1994; Schutz et al., 1992). The equilibrium between R and R* determines the level of basal activity (Bond et al., 1995). A full agonist shifts the equilibrium to the high- affinity GTP binding R* state, while inverse agonists and antagonists stabilise the low-affinity GTP binding R state (Bond et al., 1995; De Lean et al., 1980). Partial agonists and neutral antagonists have affinity for both R and R* (Bond et al., 1995). The efficacy of ligands is determined by their ability to shift the equilibrium between the two states. In the case of βARs, a two state model cannot be applied because different agonists have varying efficacies, resulting in diverse functional outcomes. In order to provide a mechanistic explanation of this scenario, it has been proposed that at the β2AR, agonist binding initiates a series of intermediate conformations, ultimately leading to an active conformation with varying affinity towards one or more G-proteins. In addition, this process is further complicated because full and partial agonists appear to stabilise distinct conformational states based on their interactions with the ligand binding pocket and their effect on conformational switches within the receptor (Kobilka et al., 2007).
2.4.1 1AR Activation Until recently, the conformational changes resulting in βAR activation were predicted from models of the inactive βAR crystal structures containing antagonists. However the recent publication of 2 active structures of rhodopsin (Choe et al., 2011; Standfuss et al., 2011), the active adenosine A2 receptor structure (Xu et al., 2011), the active state β2AR-Gs-protein ternary complex (Rasmussen et al., 2011b) and βAR crystal structures in complex with agonists (Rasmussen et al., 2011a; Rasmussen et al., 2011b; Warne et al., 2011), has afforded a greater understanding of the agonist induced conformational changes at these receptors.
16 Chapter 2
The binding pocket of the β1AR is revealed by the position of cyanopindolol (Figure 2.2, Warne et al., 2008). These interactions occur with surrounding hydrophobic residues and the polar residues, Asp121, Asn329, Tyr333 at the “front” and Ser211, Ser215 and Asn310 at the “back” of the binding pocket (Figure 2.3). The residues in the β1AR that interact with cyanopindolol are identical to those that make contact with carazolol in the β2AR binding pocket (Cherezov et al., 2007; Warne et al., 2008). Furthermore, comparison of β1AR and β2AR antagonist structures with
β1AR structures containing bound agonists reveals very little difference with respect to ligand binding (Warne et al., 2011). Additionally, the 1AR-m23 structures containing full and partial agonists are almost identical, with an exception being that full agonists appear to induce a rotamer conformational change of Ser215 in addition to Ser212 (Figure 2.3). It is proposed that the additional hydrogen bonding and stronger helice-helice interactions observed in full agonist binding causes contraction of the ligand binding pocket, while reduced hydrogen bond formation and weaker TMD helical interactions observed with partial agonists do not (Warne et al., 2011).
Figure 2.3. The ligand binding pockets of 2AR with carazolol (a, yellow), 1AR with cyanopindolol (b, yellow) and 1AR with isoprenaline (c, yellow) (Warne et al., 2011). Interacting amino acids are shown in green. Models were generated from 1AR-m23 crystallised with the antagonist cyanopindolol (Warne et al., 2008) and agonist isoprenaline (Warne et al., 2011) and β2AR-T4L crystallised with the inverse agonist carazolol (Cherezov et al., 2007).
There appears to be three structurally significant differences in the ligand pocket at β1AR when full agonists are bound compared to antagonists. These include the rotamer conformation changes in the side chains of Ser212 and Ser215, and contraction of the binding pocket, measured between TMDV and TMDVII (Figures 2.3 and 2.4, Warne et al., 2011). These changes alter the configuration of the binding
Chapter 2 17
pocket to allow the formation of additional hydrogen bonds. Furthermore, they may contribute to disruption of the interhelical interactions between TMDIV (Val172) and TMDV (Ser215) and strengthening of the TMDV (Ser212) - TMDVI (Asn310) interface (Figure 2.3, Warne et al., 2011). The rotamer changes of the TMDV serines are not present in the 1AR-m23 antagonist structure containing cyanopindolol (Figure 2.3), reducing the potential number of hydrogen bonds. A reduced number of hydrogen bonds are also predicted to occur between the headgroup of the partial agonist salbutamol and TMDV (Warne et al., 2011). Further stabilisation of the ligand binding pocket is observed via the formation of additional hydrogen bonds between Asp121 in TMDIII and the -hydroxyl of (-)-isoprenaline, strengthening the interactions of TMDIII and TMDVII (Warne et al., 2011). Dobutamine lacks a -hydroxyl group, reducing the potential number of hydrogen bonds to TMDIII. It is proposed that disruption of the TMDIII-TMDVII interface for dobutamine and the TMDV-TMDVI interface for salbutamol, in addition to reduced number of hydrogen bonds, may contribute to the decreased efficacy of these ligands. The increased network of hydrogen bonds and stabilisation of TMDIII-TMDVI and TMDV-
TMDVI interfaces, predicted from the 1AR-m23-isoprenaline bound structure, results in a 1 Å contraction of the binding pocket measured from the distance between TMDV and TMDVII (Figure 2.4).
Figure 2.4. Comparison of the 1AR-m23 structures with either cyanopindolol (grey) or isoprenaline (orange). The figure shows the positions of the ligands and the interactions formed between TMDV and TMDVII. Isoprenaline causes a 1 Å contraction of the binding pocket compared to cyanopindolol. Figure from Warne et al., (2011).
18 Chapter 2
While comparison of the βAR structures containing antagonists and agonists have provided important structural information relating to the binding pocket, it has afforded little structural insight into how agonist binding facilitates receptor activation. The fact that even agonist bound structures represent inactive receptor conformations, demonstrates the need for formation of the ternary complex to complete βAR activation (Yao et al., 2009).
Researchers have faced a difficult task in crystallising a GPCR ternary complex due to their instability in detergents (Rasmussen et al., 2011a). Recently however, the publication of a nanobody stabilised active state of the β2AR
(Rasmussen et al., 2011a) and the β2AR-Gs complex structure (Rasmussen et al., 2011b) has provided an insight into the structural changes that occur as a result of βAR activation. The Nb80 nanobody is a camelid antibody fragment that displays
G-protein like properties towards β2AR (Rasmussen et al., 2011a). Crystallisation of the active β2AR state complex was achieved using β2AR-T4L (complex used to obtain inactive β2AR carazolol structure), Nb80 and the high-affinity agonist BI- 167107. This structure has provided the first clues about the rearrangement of TMD regions, and interactions with the intracellular loops that occur in order to facilitate G-protein binding.
The major structural differences between the inactive β2AR-T4L, β2AR-Nb80 and β2AR-Gs occur at the cytoplasmic end of the receptor and involve a large outward movement of TMDV and TMDVI and an inward movement of TMDIII and TMDVII (Figure 2.5, Rasmussen et al., 2011a; Rasmussen et al., 2011b). This helical rearrangement generates a hydrophobic pocket which is occupied by Nb80. The TMD movements are facilitated by the interacting Nb80, which appears to break the hydrogen bonds of the ionic lock residues Arg130, Arg131 and Glu368, and form its own interaction with Arg131 (Rasmussen et al., 2011a). In the β2AR-Gs structure, similar helix movements are observed and the ionic lock Arg131 residue interacts with a tyrosine residue of the Gs subunit (Rasmussen et al., 2011b). An inward movement of TMDIII and TMDVII by 4 Å and 2.5 Å respectively, in addition to an outward 6 Å movement of TMDV is also observed, similar to the β2AR-Nb80
Chapter 2 19
structure (Figure 2.5, Okamoto et al., 1991; Rasmussen et al., 2011a; Rasmussen et al., 2011b).
Figure 2.5. Comparison of the inactive carazolol bound β2AR (β2AR-Cz) with the Nb80 stabilised β2AR (β2AR-Nb80, orange) and the active β2AR-Gs structure (β2AR-Gs, green). This cytoplasmic view depicts the large outward movements of TMDVI in the active structures β2AR-Nb80 and β2AR-Gs relative to the inactive β2AR-Cz. The smaller TMDIII, TMDV and TMDVII movements are also shown. Figures from Rasmussen et al., 2011a (left) and Rasmussen et al., 2011b (right).
The BI-167107-β2AR-T4L interactions are relatively similar to the interactions observed in the 1AR-m23-isoprenaline bound structure and also the β2AR-carazolol bound structure. The biggest difference within the β2AR active and inactive ligand binding pocket is the inward movement (2.1 Å) of TMDV (Rasmussen et al., 2011a).
A contraction of the TMDV region is also observed in the 1AR-m23-isoprenaline structure (Figure 2.3, Warne et al., 2011). At the β2AR, the agonist BI-167107 interacts with TMDV Ser203 and Ser204, similarly to the interactions formed between isoprenaline and TMDV Ser211 and Ser215 at the β1AR. Additionally, the
Ser212 in β1AR and Ser204 in β2AR do not interact directly with the ligand, but form an additional hydrogen bond with Asn310 on TMDVI in β1AR and Asn293 in β2AR, which in turn interacts with Tyr308 in ECL3. In contrast, carazolol forms only a single hydrogen bond with Ser203 at β2AR, similarly to cyanopindolol at β1AR, which forms a hydrogen bond with the analogous residue (Ser211). These results suggest that the increased stabilisation of the binding pocket via interactions between ligands and the TMDV serines, in addition to the formation of helice-helice
20 Chapter 2
interactions when full agonists are bound to βARs, are critical in stabilising a high- affinity G-protein coupling state.
While these crystal structures provide a fascinating insight into βAR-ligand interactions, how these relatively subtle changes are propagated into the large structural changes observed in the cytoplasmic region of the receptor is still speculative. The development of ligands that will allow the manipulation of this process is further complicated by the fact that different agonists are likely to induce and/or stabilise different conformations at different GPCRs, leading to varying structural outcomes. Kinetic studies also support the formation of early intermediate conformations upon agonist binding, followed by larger and slower conformational changes that involve intramolecular switches and TMD interactions (Kobilka et al., 2007; Liapakis et al., 2004; Swaminath et al., 2005). The available βAR crystal structures represent a single static view of this process. Another consideration is that βARs display basal activity. This suggests that the tertiary structure of the binding pocket is highly dynamic and can transition between inactive (R) and active (R*) states in the absence of a ligand. Furthermore, studies demonstrating that constitutively active mutants can be generated by a single point mutation, shows that disruption of a single interaction may be adequate to cause receptor activation. This level of sensitivity and structural complexity displayed by GPCRs, suggests that a dynamic view of receptor activation is required in order to understand how intermediate conformations are formed by rearrangement of amino acid packing and TMD movements.
2.4.2 1AR Signalling Recent advances in GPCR research have revealed the complex nature of GPCR signalling. It is now well established that the classical lock and key mechanism cannot be applied. Studies have demonstrated that GPCR activation often results in a multitude of signalling outcomes and may involve coupling to multiple G-proteins, signalling via G and/or G and even G-protein independent pathways (reviewed in Audet et al., 2008; Hoffmann et al., 2008; Kenakin, 2007; Seifert et al., 2009). Consequently, the classification of GPCR ligands has also become increasingly
Chapter 2 21
difficult. Ligands once classed as simple agonists, have been shown to possess varied efficacy or even inhibit one or more signalling pathways controlled by a particular GPCR (Kenakin, 2001). This phenomenon, often referred to a ligand bias or biased agonism, may in the future be exploited as a therapeutic strategy to develop drugs that activate clinically favourable pathways while inhibiting detrimental pathways. The multiple signalling pathways that are activated by βARs have been extensively reviewed (Audet et al., 2008; Hoffmann et al., 2008; Kenakin, 2007; Seifert et al., 2009). This section will address functional outcomes resulting from βAR activation with particular emphasis on β1AR signalling and function in the human heart.
β1ARs are expressed in a variety of mammalian tissues. Tissues that contain high levels of β1AR expression include the brain, kidney, adipose tissue and the heart. In the brain, β1ARs are localised in various regions and are the dominantly expressed βAR subtype (Gibbs et al., 2005; Machida et al., 1990; Minneman et al.,
1979; Paschalis et al., 2009). β1ARs are found predominantly within neurons of the brain where they play a role in neuronal plasticity, memory and learning, and memory retrieval processes (Gibbs et al., 2005; Murchison et al., 2004; Ramos et al.,
2005). β1ARs are also involved in regulating the secretion of melatonin from the pineal gland and have also been implicated in mood change (Leonard, 1997).
β1ARs in the kidney act to increase renin release from the juxtaglomerular apparatus (Kurtz et al., 1999; Torretti, 1982). High levels of β1AR expression are also found in brown (Bukowiecki et al., 1980; Levin et al., 1986; Rothwell et al., 1985) and white adipose tissues (Germack et al., 2000; Lacasa et al., 1986; Mauriege et al., 1988). β1AR activation in white adipose tissue controls lipolysis (Berlan et al.,
1978), while in brown adipose tissue β1AR activation has been implicated in heat production (Lafontan et al., 1993). In the heart, β1AR expression has been extensively characterised in a variety of mammalian species including rodent (Juberg et al., 1985; Ota et al., 1993), guinea pig (Molenaar et al., 1987; Summers et al., 1987), feline (Lemoine et al., 1991; Molenaar et al., 1985), ferret (Lowe et al., 2002), canine (Molenaar et al., 1988), pig (Sillence et al., 2005) and human (Buxton et al., 1987; Molenaar et al., 1989; Summers et al., 1989). Activation of cardiac
β1AR and β2ARs mediates positive chronotropic, inotropic, lusitropic and
22 Chapter 2
dromotropic effects (Gille et al., 1985; Hall et al., 1990; Katz et al., 1975; Kaumann et al., 1989; Kaumann et al., 1996b; Molenaar et al., 2000; Molenaar et al., 2002;
Molenaar et al., 2007b). Chronic β1AR stimulation in the human heart is thought to result in receptor desensitisation and cause changes in heart pathophysiology that are associated with the progression of heart failure (reviewed in Bristow, 2000; Brodde et al., 1995).
2.5 AR SIGNALLING IN THE HUMAN HEART
In the human heart, β1AR and β2AR coexist (Ablad et al., 1974) with β1AR representing ~60-70% and ~70-80% of the total βAR population in atria and ventricles respectively (reviewed in Brodde, 1991; Brodde et al., 1999). The endogenous catecholamines adrenaline and noradrenaline released from adrenal glands and sympathetic nerves respectively, bind to β1AR and β2AR and stabilise a receptor conformation that facilitates binding of the heterotrimeric Gs-protein (Birnbaumer et al., 1987; Gilman, 1987).
Formation of the βAR-Gs ternary complex results in the transfer of GDP for GTP from the Gs subunit (Asano et al., 1984; Brandt et al., 1986). The mechanism underlying GDP/GTP transfer has not been elucidated. GTP binding results in the dissociation of Gs from the subunits, allowing the Gs subunit to activate the membrane bound adenylyl cyclase, resulting in the conversion of ATP to cAMP (Figure 2.6, reviewed in Levitzki, 1988). Adenylyl cyclase is more tightly coupled to
β2AR than β1AR even though β1AR is dominantly expressed (Brodde et al., 1984; Waelbroeck et al., 1983). This variance has been reported in right atrium (Brodde et al., 1984; Gille et al., 1985; Lemoine et al., 1988), right ventricle (Bristow et al., 1989; Kaumann et al., 1989; Kaumann et al., 1987; Lemoine et al., 1988) and recombinant βARs (Green et al., 1992; Levy et al., 1993). A proline-rich region in ICL3 appears to contribute in part to the decreased adenylyl cyclase coupling efficiency of β1AR compared to β2AR (Green et al., 1994), but the physiological role underlying this anomaly is still unclear. βAR mediated increases in intracellular cAMP activates PKA which phosphorylates numerous proteins involved in cardiac excitation-contraction including, L-type calcium channels, phospholamban, troponin
Chapter 2 23
I and C protein (Kaumann et al., 1999; Kaumann et al., 1996b; Molenaar et al.,
2000; Molenaar et al., 2007b). Additionally, acute β1AR activation causes PKA- independent phosphorylation of Thr17-phospholamban via the calmodulin-dependent protein kinase (CAMKII) pathway. Dephosphorylation of Thr17-phospholamban is catalysed by type 1 phosphatase which in turn, is inhibited by PKA-dependent phosphorylation of protein phosphatase inhibitor 1 (Kaumann et al., 1999). Activation of this pathway appears to evoke myocyte apoptosis in animal models (Wang et al., 2004; Zaugg et al., 2000; Zhu et al., 2003).
Figure 2.6. Schematic representation of main βAR signal transduction pathways in cardiac sympathetic nervous transmission. Pre-junctional regulation of noradrenaline is facilitated by β2AR and αARs. Noradrenaline binds to post-junctional β1ARs that are coupled to the Gsα-cAMP pathway. Cyclic AMP activates cAMP dependant protein kinase leading to the phosphorylation of several proteins involved in increasing force of contraction and hastening of relaxation. βARs are also coupled to other pathways including the β2AR Giα signalling pathway, which causes anti- apoptotic effects through phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) and protein kinase B (PKB) signalling (Schluter et al., 1998). Additionally, Ca2+ increases mediated by 2+ β1AR stimulate Ca calmodulin-dependent protein kinase (CAMKII) in animals (Machida et al., 2005). Figure adapted from Molenaar et al., (2005).
There is evidence for β3AR expression in human heart (Moniotte et al., 2001a; Moniotte et al., 2001b), however their functional role remains controversial. Studies have reported conflicting results with respect to contractile function (Gauthier et al., 1996; Kaumann et al., 2008; Molenaar et al., 1997; Rozec et al., 2006; Skeberdis et al., 2008). Gauthier et al., (1996), reported that β3AR agonists produced negative
24 Chapter 2
inotropic effects on human ventricle obtained from endomyocardial biopsies. This effect could be due to release of nitric oxide (NO) from endothelial and/or endocardial cells, considering the negative inotropic effects of the β3AR agonist BRL 37344 were prevented by the NO antagonist L-NMA (Napp et al., 2009). In other studies, β3AR agonists were devoid of cardiodepressant or cardiostimulant effects in human ventricular trabeculae (Kaumann et al., 2008; Molenaar et al., 1997). In contrast, increased contractile force in human atrium and increases in L-type calcium current (ICa-L) reportedly from β3AR activation have been observed (Skeberdis et al., 2008).
In human cardiomyocytes, cardiac excitation-contraction coupling is modulated by activation of β1AR and β2AR via the Gs-PKA-cAMP pathway (Figure 2.7, Kaumann et al., 1997c; Molenaar et al., 2007a). Increased contractility results from Ca2+ influx through L-type calcium channels, causing the release of larger amounts of Ca2+ from the sarcoplasmic reticulum ryanodine channel (RyR2) and Na+/Ca2+ exchanger, which then diffuses through the myocyte and interacts with troponin C on myofilaments to initiate contraction (Kaumann et al., 1997c; Molenaar et al., 2007a). This part of the contraction mechanism is called systole. The diffusion of Ca2+ away from the myofilaments and re-uptake in the sarcoplasmic reticulum by Ca2+ATPase (and to lesser extent the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger) and extrusion from the myocyte causes relaxation and is known as diastole (Bers, 2002; Blayney et al., 2009; Molenaar et al., 2007a). The quantity of Ca2+ released from the sarcoplasmic reticulum through RyR2 plays a critical role in determining the magnitude of systole. The duration of contraction and length of diastole is determined by the rate of uptake of Ca2+ into the sarcoplasmic reticulum.
Chapter 2 25
Figure 2.7. The effects of the βAR-Gs-protein-adenylyl cyclase-cAMP-protein kinase A pathway in human heart on systole (left panels) and diastole (right panels). Activation of 1-and 2ARs during systole causes PKA-dependent phosphorylation of L-type Ca2+ channels which increases Ca2+ influx leading to a larger release of Ca2+ from the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) through ryanodine channels (RyR2). Ca2+ binds to troponin C initiating actin–myosin cross-bridge cycling. 2AR activation causes higher cAMP production compared to 1AR due to tighter coupling to AC. Activation of 1-and 2ARs causes hastening of relaxation by PKA-catalysed phosphorylation of Ser16-phospholamban and troponin I. Phosphorylation of Thr17- phospholamban is caused by calcium calmodulin kinase II. AR, adrenoceptor; PDE, phosphodiesterase; PLB, phospholamban; Ac, adenylyl cyclase; TNC, troponin C; TNI-P, phosphorylated troponin I. Figure from Molenaar et al., (2007).
26 Chapter 2
In the human heart both β1AR and β2AR regulate systole and duration of diastole. This occurs due to PKA dependent phosphorylation of L-type calcium channels causing increased influx of Ca2+ (Trautwein et al., 1990), increased sensitivity of phosphorylated RyR2 to Ca2+ (Blayney et al., 2009; Xiao et al., 2007), increased sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ stores (Blayney et al., 2009; Li et al., 2000) caused by PKA-dependent phosphorylation of phospholamban, which reduces the inhibitory effect of phospholamban on the IIA sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase pump (Kaumann et al., 1999; Molenaar et al., 2000; Molenaar et al., 2007b), phosphorylation of troponin I which causes reduced affinity of Ca2+ for troponin C (Zhang et al., 1995), resulting in hastening of relaxation (reviewed in Molenaar et al., 2007a) and increased sensitivity to luminal Ca2+ concentrations (Figure 2.7, Blayney et al., 2009; Xiao et al., 2007). PKA-dependent phosphorylation of RyR2 increases the sensitivity to Ca2+ induced activation and increases the probability of the channel opening (Blayney et al., 2009; Marx et al., 2000). Hyperphosphorylation of RyR2 is observed in heart failure and causes destabilisation and desensitisation of the receptor resulting in increased Ca2+ leak from the sarcoplasmic reticulum (Blayney et al., 2009). This appears to lead to impaired contractile function and is also associated with cardiac arrhythmias (Marx et al., 2000). In the human heart, it is not known whether PKA-dependent phosphorylation of the RyR2 occurs as a result of βAR activation. βAR subtype activation of the RyR2 requires investigation, because it may provide a therapeutic strategy for the management of arrhythmias in heart failure.
2.5.1 The Role of1AR in Heart Failure Human heart failure is a complex clinical condition that is characterised by reduced cardiac output, fluid retention and elevated venous pressure (Katz, 2003). In the failing human heart, activation of 1ARs occurs as a physiological response to facilitate adequate hemodynamic function and perfusion pressure in organs. During heart failure, chronic activation of 1AR leads to hypertrophy and cardiac remodelling (Cohn et al., 1984; Engelhardt et al., 2004). A decrease in the sensitivity of 1AR to catecholamines caused by receptor down-regulation and decreased 1AR density is observed in human heart failure (Bristow et al., 1986; Brodde, 1991).
Chapter 2 27
The desensitisation and internalisation of 1AR, like many GPCRs, appears to involve a three step process that includes, receptor phosphorylation, interactions with scaffolding proteins such as postsynaptic density 95/disc large/zonula occuldens-1 (PDZ) proteins and -arrestins, receptor endocytosis and degradation mediated by clathrin-coated pits (reviewed in Hanyaloglu et al., 2008). The 1AR is phosphorylated at consensus sites within ICL3 and the C-terminal tail by PKA, protein kinase C and G-protein receptor kinases (Friedman et al., 2002; Hausdorff et al., 1991; January et al., 1998; January et al., 1997; Seibold et al., 1998; Seibold et al., 2000; Tran et al., 2004) and interacts with the scaffolding proteins PSD 95, MAGI 2 and -arrestin 1 and 2 resulting in receptor internalisation and recycling (Gage et al., 2005; Gardner et al., 2007; He et al., 2006; Xiang et al., 2002; Xu et al., 2001). Receptor expression and receptor occupancy appear to be the main contributing factors that regulate these processes (He et al., 2006). Because heart failure patients exhibit an increase in the level of plasma noradrenaline (Cohn et al., 1984), it would appear that the processes involved in receptor desensitisation and internalisation are upregulated (He et al., 2006; Hu et al., 2000; Xiang et al., 2002; Xu et al., 2001).
The current therapeutic strategy employed to manage heart failure involves administering compounds that block the effects of catecholamines at βARs. However, until the mid 1990s βARs agonists (noradrenaline, adrenaline, dobutamine and dopamine) were commonly prescribed to patients with chronic heart failure on the premise that increased sympathetic nervous system activity would increase blood pressure and maintain cardiac output (Molenaar et al., 2005). It later became apparent that βAR agonists and other positive inotropic agents had detrimental effects on the heart resulting in increased mortality (Packer, 1992; Packer et al., 1991; Persson et al., 1996; The Xamoterol in Severe Heart Failure Study Group, 1990). Nevertheless, AR agonists still have a role in the management of human heart failure to provide inotropic support for the failing heart when it is decompensated and when other reparative measures have failed (Molenaar et al., 2005). In practice, they are more often used as a ‘bridge to transplantation’ in end- stage heart failure.
28 Chapter 2
The introduction of propranolol into clinical practice in 1965 by Sir James Black for the treatment of coronary artery disease provided the basis for the mechanism of β-blockade as a therapeutic strategy (Black et al., 1965). This clinical practice was also pioneered by Finn Waagstein and colleagues in 1975 (Waagstein et al., 1975) who introduced β-blockers as a treatment for congestive heart failure. The principle of β-blockade was based on decreasing the energy demand of the heart in order to provide a more favourable hemodynamic state (Waagstein et al., 1975). This hypothesis was initially met with uncertainty and scepticism, especially considering the report that short term administration of β-blockers was detrimental to patients with ventricular dysfunction (Epstein et al., 1966). It wasn’t until the mid 1990s when large scale clinical trials revealed the benefits of β-blockers and established their use as a means to clinically manage heart failure.
The pharmacological effects of β-blockers differ significantly and hence have evolved since their introduction into clinical practice. The first clinically used β-blockers such as propranolol were introduced as a treatment for angina and were non-selective towards β1AR and β2ARs (Black et al., 1965). The second generation of β-blockers developed in the 1970s and 80s selectively antagonised β1ARs and included compounds such as metoprolol and bisoprolol (Ablad et al., 1975; Schliep et al., 1984). These compounds, mainly used to treat hypertension, aimed at selectively blocking the β1AR in order to ameliorate the vascular and pulmonary side effects associated with non-selective 1-2AR-blockers. This hypothesis was never conclusively proved (Newton et al., 1999; Newton et al., 1996). The third class of β-blockers developed in the 1980s included the compounds carvedilol and bucindolol and had additional properties in that they not only blocked both β1ARs and β2ARs, but they also demonstrated antioxidant activity and vasodilating properties through + blockade of α1-adrenoceptors or activation of K channels (Bristow et al., 1992; Bristow et al., 1998; Gilbert et al., 1996; Gilbert et al., 1990).
The therapeutic effects of second and third generation β-blockers have been extensively tested in large scale clinical trials (Colucci et al., 1996; Packer et al.,
Chapter 2 29
1996; Packer et al., 2001; Poole-Wilson et al., 2003; The Beta-Blocker Evaluation of Survival Trial Investigators, 2001; The CIBIS-II Investigators, 1999; The MERIT- HF Investigators, 1999; Waagstein et al., 1993). Results of these trials have reported reduced morbidity and mortality with the β-blockers metoprolol, bisoprolol and carvedilol. Interestingly however, not all trials produced survival benefits (The Beta- Blocker Evaluation of Survival Trial Investigators, 2001; The Xamoterol in Severe Heart Failure Study Group, 1990). This appears due to the intrinsic sympathomimetic activity of some β-blockers, an effect which is clinically unfavourable in heart failure (Packer, 1998; The Xamoterol in Severe Heart Failure Study Group, 1990).
Although the results of clinical trials demonstrate that some β-blockers produce survival benefits in heart failure patients, considerable inter-individual variability exists (Lechat et al., 1997). Studies have begun to explore genetic variation as a potential mechanism underlying inter-individual responses to β-blockers (Chen et al., 2007; Liggett et al., 2006; Mialet Perez et al., 2003; Terra et al., 2005). These studies have implicated the 389 (Arg/Gly) polymorphism as a contributing factor to the effectiveness of β-blocker treatment. Results from these studies demonstrate that patients carrying the Arg389Arg variant exhibit significantly greater improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) compared to Gly389Gly patients after treatment with carvedilol and metoprolol (Chen et al., 2007; Mialet Perez et al., 2003; Terra et al., 2005). The observation that Arg389 βARs have higher basal activity than Gly389 βARs in recombinant systems (Joseph et al., 2004c; Mason et al., 1999), has led to the suggestion that catecholamines produce larger effects through Arg389 βARs, which leads to more effective β-blockade (Chen et al., 2007).
Bucindolol, another β-blocker which like carvedilol is non-selective with respect to β1ARs and β2ARs and causes vasodilatation, produced no survival benefits in clinical studies (Poole-Wilson et al., 2003). However a follow-up study did uncover a significant survival benefit in Arg389Arg patients, although no improvement in LVEF was observed (Liggett et al., 2006). A closer examination of the pharmacology of bucindolol could uncover the reason for it’s ineffectiveness compared to carvedilol. One possible difference could be that it can activate the low- affinity site of the β1AR. This property, previously observed with drugs such as
30 Chapter 2
(-)-pindolol and (-)-CGP 12177 (4-(3-tertiarybutylamino-2-hydroxypropoxy)- benzimidazole-2-on hydrochloride), causes cardiostimulant effects in humans and arrhythmias in animal models (Kaumann et al., 1996a; Molenaar et al., 1997).
2.6 1LAR PHARMACOLOGY
Results that demonstrated cardiostimulant effects of β-blockers at concentrations that were higher than those that caused blockade were first reported by Kaumann et al. (1973). Kaumann initially set out to test the affinity of a series of β-blockers for βARs, and found that some of these compounds had intrinsic agonist activity in tissue preparations of feline and guinea pig hearts. Because these β-blockers produced cardiostimulant effects that were less than the maximal effect for the agonist (-)-isoprenaline (a reference agonist used to measure maximal βAR effects), they were initially considered to be partial agonists. This was proposed based on receptor theory which stated by definition that a full agonist could produce a maximal effect at a concentration that occupies a small percentage of receptors, while a partial agonist is required to saturate the receptor population in order to produce it’s maximal effect (Stephenson, 1956). Therefore, one could expect the KP (equilibrium dissociation constant of a partial agonist) of a partial agonist to be the same as the concentration required to produce a 50% maximal effect (EC50). This was the case for the β-blockers pronethalol and practolol, however pindolol was atypical because it did not exhibit the classic behaviour of a partial agonist (Kaumann et al., 1973a).
The half maximal cardiostimulant effects of pindolol occurred at concentrations that were significantly greater (no less than one order of magnitude) than the KB (equilibrium dissociation constant of an antagonist, measured from competitive blockade of the effects of an agonist) recorded against (-)-isoprenaline (Kaumann et al., 1973a). The dissociation between concentrations of pindolol required for blockade of the cardiostimulant effects of (-)-isoprenaline and it’s own cardiostimulant effects prompted the re-classification of β-blockers as either conventional or non-conventional partial agonists (Figure 2.8, Kaumann, 1989). A
Chapter 2 31
non-conventional partial agonist causes activation only at high receptor occupancy (Kaumann et al., 1973b)
Figure 2.8. The correlation between the potencies (pD2) and affinities (pKa) of partial agonists on isolated heart preparations. The open symbols represent conventional partial agonists acting via β1ARs (○), β2ARs (∆) or most probably both (□). The closed symbols represent non-conventional partial agonists such as pindolol and indoleamines (●), CGP 12177 (▲) and alprenolol (■) acting via atypical βARs. Graph from Kaumann, 1989.
2.6.1 Mechanistic Studies Into the Pharmacology of 1LAR The dissociation between blockade and stimulation raised questions with regard to the mechanism through which pindolol, other indoleamines and chemically similar compounds elicited cardiostimulation. The first question was whether these effects were mediated through βARs. Using both enantiomers, (-)-pindolol and (+)-pindolol on guinea pig atrium, it was found that (-)-pindolol produced biphasic activity, measured on a concentration-effect curve (Walter et al., 1984). The curve
32 Chapter 2
consisted of a high-potency (H) component (pEC50 = 9.2) and a low-potency (L) component (pEC50 = 6.1). The addition of the β1AR selective antagonist (-)-bisoprolol into the system effectively blocked the H-component but had no effect on the L-component. Meanwhile, the L-component was blocked with moderate potency by the non-selective βAR antagonist (-)-bupranolol (Morris et al., 1981;
Walter et al., 1984). The β2AR selective antagonist ICI 118,551 had no effect on either component. The concentration-effect curve produced by (+)-pindolol was monophasic (pEC50 = 7.6), and the cardiostimulant effects were blocked by ICI
118,551, suggesting that these effects were mediated through β2AR (Walter et al., 1984). It was concluded from these experiments that at low concentrations
(-)-pindolol mediated antagonism of (-)-isoprenaline through a high-affinity β1AR population, while at high concentrations, (-)-pindolol caused cardiostimulation through a low-affinity receptor population (Walter et al., 1984). At this time the βAR subtype which (-)-pindolol had low-affinity for remained contentious.
Further studies analysing the behaviour of non-conventional partial agonists provided evidence to suggest that the heart may express a third βAR (Kaumann, 1989). Properties of this putative cardiac βAR were it’s activation by non- conventional partial agonists at high concentrations, inability of propranolol and bisoprolol to block stimulant effects and blockade by moderately low (1 μM) concentrations of (-)-bupranolol (Kaumann, 1989; Walter et al., 1984).
2.6.2 The Putative β4-Adrenoceptor: A Working Hypothesis Studies into the dissociation between stimulation and blockade by the hydrophilic βAR antagonist CGP 12177 (Staehelin et al., 1983) on cardiac tissue were subsequently performed (Arch et al., 1993; Kaumann, 1983; Kaumann, 1989; Pak et al., 1996). Kaumann, (1996) reported that high concentrations of (-)-CGP 12177 (60-600 nM) caused positive inotropic effects on right atrial appendages (human right atrial heart muscle) obtained from patients with coronary artery disease undergoing surgery (Kaumann, 1996). These effects were resistant to blockade by (-)-propranolol (200 nM), a concentration that causes a >60 fold rightward shift to the concentration-effect curve of (-)-noradrenaline at β1AR (Gille et al., 1985), and
Chapter 2 33
blocked with moderate potency by (-)-bupranolol (pKB = 7.3, Kaumann, 1996, compared to 9.1 and 9.7 for β1AR and β2AR, Lemoine et al., 1983). Results from this study led Kaumann to conclude that cardiostimulation of (-)-CGP 12177 was mediated through a third cardiac βAR population which was possibly related to the
β3AR cloned by Emorine et al., (1989). This assumption was based on:
the inotropic effects of (-)-CGP 12177 measured in right atrial tissue were
propranolol (a high-affinity β1- and β2AR blocker) resistant, but were blocked with moderate affinity by bupranolol.
(-)-bupranolol blocked (-)-CGP 12177 (pKB = 7.3) at β1AR in human right
atrial tissue similarly to transfected human β3AR (pKB = 7.7) (Blin et al.,
1993; Blin et al., 1994) and β3ARs from rat adipose tissue (pKB = 7.3-7.5) (Langin et al., 1991).
The potency of (-)-CGP 12177 on human right atrial appendages causing
agonist effects (pEC50 = 7.3) was similar to the binding affinities of
(-)-CGP 12177 measured at cloned recombinant β3AR (pKI = 7.3) (Blin et
al., 1993) and in β3AR from human omental fat (Revelli et al., 1993).
Shortly after, Kaumann and Molenaar published results of a study comparing similarities and differences between the third cardiac βAR and colonic β3AR from rat (Kaumann et al., 1996a). In these experiments (-)-CGP 12177 caused positive inotropic effects in rat left and right atrial tissue preparations. These effects were resistant to blockade by 200 nM (-)-propranolol and 3 μM ICI 118,551 (β2AR selective antagonist) and blocked by 1 μM (-)-bupranolol (pKB = 6.4-6.8), 3 μM CGP
20712A (pKB = 6.3-6.4) (β1AR selective antagonist) and 6.6 μM SR 59230A (β3AR selective antagonist) (pKB = 5.1-5.4). (-)-CGP 12177 also displayed partial agonist activity via β3AR (pKA = 7.3-7.5), causing colonic relaxation effects which were maximal at about approximately 55% of those cause by (-)-isoprenaline. These effects were resistant to blockade by 200 nM (-)-propranolol, 3 μM CGP 20712A and
3 μM ICI 118,551. However, 2 μM (-)-propranolol (pKB = 6.0), 1 μM (-)-bupranolol
(pKB = 6.4), and 3 μM SR 59230A (pKB = 6.3) antagonised the relaxant effects of
(-)-CGP 12177. The results differ in that the β1AR selective agonist CGP 20712A blocked the effects of (-)-CGP 12177 in atria, but did not cause blockade of effects in the colon. Also, the β3AR selective antagonist SR 59230A effectively blocked the
34 Chapter 2
colonic relaxation effects of (-)-CGP 12177 but displayed decreased affinity in antagonising the positive inotropic effects of (-)-CGP 12177 in right and left atria. This pharmacology suggested that the activity mediated by (-)-CGP 12177 occurred through different receptors. Furthermore, micromolar concentrations of the following
β3AR selective agonists; BRL 37344, ZD 2079, CL 316242 and SR 58611A were potent colonic relaxants, but did not cause cardiostimulation or affect cardiostimulation caused by (-)-CGP 12177. Due to the distinct differences in pharmacology displayed by (-)-CGP 12177 and β3AR selective agonists and antagonists, Kaumann and Molenaar concluded that the third cardiac βAR was different to the colonic β3AR.
Because the third cardiac βAR exhibited significant differences to the colonic
β3AR and had distinctively different pharmacology compared to β1AR and β2AR, the term “putative β4-adrenoceptor” was coined to differentiate it from the β3AR, thus avoiding confusion (Molenaar et al., 1997). Further studies followed, that aimed to identify this novel receptor encoded gene and further characterise its pharmacological properties.
2.6.3 Proposal of a Low-Affinity Form of the β1-Adrenoceptor Pak and Fishman et al. (1996) were the first to propose that the hypothetical
βAR was in fact a low-affinity form of the β1AR, in what has become a seminal study in the field. Using (±)-CGP 12177 on human or rat β1AR stably transfected into Chinese Hamster Fibroblast Cells (CHW), Pak and Fishmann reported its ability to antagonise increases in cAMP levels produced by (-)-isoprenaline at low concentrations, while higher concentrations (approximately 2 log units) caused concentration-dependent increases in cAMP (Figure 2.9). (±)-CGP 12177 also increased cAMP in Baby Hamster Kidney (BHK) and Chinese Hamster Ovary
(CHO) cells expressing human β1AR (pEC50 = ~7.7). In general, (±)-CGP 12177 behaved as a partial agonist with respect to isoprenaline, however in cell lines containing high receptor densities (~ 1 pmol/mg protein) it behaved as a full agonist.
The agonist effects of (±)-CGP 12177 were proportional to β1AR receptor densities, and were antagonised by the β1AR selective antagonist CGP 20712A (pKB ~ 7.7).
Chapter 2 35
The β2AR selective antagonist ICI 118,551 blocked (±)-CGP 12177 agonists effects with 80-fold lower potency, which suggested that the agonist activity was being mediated through β1AR (Pak et al., 1996). (±)-CGP 12177 behaved as a weak partial agonist in Chinese Hamster cells expressing β2AR.
Figure 2.9. The biphasic activity of CGP 12177 is represented in the above concentration-effect curve. Chinese Hamster Fibroblast cells expressing human β1ARs were exposed to 2 nM isoprenaline in the presence of increasing concentrations of (±)-CGP 12177. Figure from Pak et al., 1996.
Competition binding studies were employed to further study the binding sites responsible for the effects of (±)-CGP 12177. Using membrane preparations 3 expressing β1AR, (-)-[ H]-CGP 12177 labelled high-affinity β1AR binding sites with pKD = 9.7. (±)-CGP 12177 competed with high-affinity (pKi = 9.5) for 90% of 125 binding sites occupied by (-)-[ I]-cyanopindolol, and with low-affinity (pKi = 7.7) for the remaining 10% of binding sites. The low-affinity of (±)-[3H]-CGP 12177 at
β1AR was similar in its potency, leading Pak and Fishman to conclude that the antagonist effects could be mediated through a high-affinity β1AR receptor population, while the agonist effects were mediated through a low-affinity β1AR receptor population coupled to Gs protein. This conclusion prompted subsequent
36 Chapter 2
recombinant βAR studies (Baker, 2005a; Baker, 2005b; Baker et al., 2003; Joseph et al., 2004b; Konkar et al., 2000b), and studies in βAR knockout mice (Kaumann et al., 2001; Kaumann et al., 1998; Konkar et al., 2000a; Konkar et al., 2000b).
2.6.4 Pharmacological Differences Between the Putative β4-Adrenoceptor and Low-Affinity β1-Adrenoceptor In 1998, the contribution of Sarsero and colleagues resulted in the development 3 of a radioligand binding assay using (-)-[ H]-CGP 12177 to study the putative β4AR (Sarsero et al., 1998). The use of this assay on rat atrial membranes demonstrated the 3 stereoselectivity of catecholamines for the putative β4AR. (-)-[ H]-CGP 12177 was 3 used to label β1AR, β2AR and putative β4AR. The observed binding of (-)-[ H]-CGP
12177 was biphasic, consisting of a high-affinity binding site (pKD = 9.4,
β1AR/β2AR) and low-affinity binding site (pKD = 7.6, β4AR). Binding in the presence of 500 nM (-)-propranolol revealed that 35% of total specific sites were labelled with (-)-[3H]-CGP 12177 at high-affinity , while 65% were labelled with low-affinity (Sarsero et al., 1998). The biphasic binding of (-)-[3H]-CGP 12177 was also observed in ventricular membranes with pKD = 9.0 (β1AR/β2AR) and pKD = 7.3 3 (β4AR) (Sarsero et al., 1999). The ratio of (-)-[ H]-CGP 12177 binding at high and low-affinity sites was different to that reported by Pak and Fishmann where low- affinity binding represented only 10% of the total binding sites (Pak et al., 1996).
The low-affinity binding of (-)-CGP 12177 observed by Pak and Fishmann also caused an increase in cAMP accumulation, which was attributed to stimulation of a guanidine nucleotide sensitive form of the β1AR, coupled to the Gs protein which comprised 10% of the total β1AR population (Pak et al., 1996). However, in rat atrium the putative β4AR represented approximately 35% of the total binding sites and appeared insensitive to guanidine nucleotides (Sarsero et al., 1998). These inconsistencies, required further investigation to determine if the agonist properties of (±)-CGP 12177 observed through the low-affinity form of recombinant β1AR (Pak et al., 1996), were indeed the same as the putative β4AR in rat atria (Sarsero et al., 1998).
Chapter 2 37
2.6.5 The Underlying Role of β1-Adrenoceptors in Putative β4-Adrenoceptor Pharmacology
Direct evidence supporting the contribution of β1AR to the effects caused by non-conventional partial agonists such as (-)-CGP 12177 was provided from experiments with recombinant β1AR and tissues from genetically engineered βAR knockout mice (Kaumann et al., 2001; Kaumann et al., 1998; Konkar et al., 2000a; Konkar et al., 2000b). Experiments using brown adipose tissue membranes from wild-type mice demonstrated that (-)-CGP 12177 stimulated adenylyl cyclase activity with a high-affinity component and low-affinity component (Konkar et al., 2000a). The low-affinity activity of (-)-CGP 12177 was absent in brown adipose tissue membranes from β3AR knockout mice, while tissues from β1AR knockout mice lacked the high-affinity activity. In addition, the low-affinity activity of (-)-CGP 12177 was resistant to blockade by 1 M CGP 20712A, while CGP 20712A caused blockade of the high-affinity component with a pKB of 7.4, consistent with the value obtained from recombinant β1AR (Konkar et al., 2000a; Konkar et al., 2000b). Taken together, these data suggested that (-)-CGP 12177 increased adenylyl cyclase activity with low-affinity via β3AR and with high-affinity via β1AR (Konkar et al., 2000a).
Experiments using β3AR knockout mice (Kaumann et al., 1998), β2AR knockout mice and β1AR/ β2AR knockout mice (Kaumann et al., 2001) confirmed that the previously observed cardiostimulation caused by (-)-CGP 12177 was mediated through β1AR. (-)-CGP 12177 elicited cardiostimulant effects in atria from
β2AR knockout mice and β3AR knockout mice but these effects were not present in the atria from β1AR/β2AR knockout mice (Kaumann et al., 2001; Kaumann et al.,
1998) (Figure 2.10). The results indicate that the pharmacology of the putative β4AR in human heart was not due to a novel receptor gene, as previously proposed (Kaumann et al., 1998). Furthermore, these results clearly demonstrated the obligatory requirement of β1AR in the mediation of cardiostimulation effects by (-)-CGP 12177 (Kaumann et al., 2001).
38 Chapter 2
Figure 2.10. Polygraph traces comparing the effects (-)-CGP 12177 (1 μM/L), on left atrium from β2AR knockout (β2AR KO) and β1AR/β2AR (β1AR/β2AR KO) double knockout mice set up in the same tissue bath. Increased force of contraction was observed in the β2AR KO atria but not the β1AR/β2AR KO atria after addition of (-)-CGP 12177 (1 μM/L). IBMX (a phosphodiesterase inhibitor) and dibutyryl cAMP caused increased force of contraction in both atria. Data from Kaumann et al., 2001
These observations were further characterised using CHO cells stably expressing rat and human β1AR at physiological densities (Konkar et al., 2000b). (-)-CGP 12177 increased adenylyl cyclase activity in CHO cells expressing rat or human β1AR with pEC50 values of 7.83 and 7.90 respectively (Konkar et al., 2000b). These effects were relatively resistant to blockade by propranolol, while
CGP 20712A caused blockade of (-)-CGP 12177 activity with pKB values of 7.35 and 7.38 at rat and human β1AR respectively. Furthermore, higher concentrations of CGP 20712A were required to block the effects of (-)-CGP 12177 compared to isoprenaline, providing further evidence for the proposal of two distinct sites within the β1AR (Konkar et al., 2000b).
2.6.6 Structural Implications of High and Low-Affinity Binding of Non- Conventional Partial Agonists to β1-Adrenoceptors
The potential for the β1AR to exist in high and low-affinity states was first endorsed by Pak and Fishmann et al., 1996, and became an accepted view among other researchers (Baker, 2005a; Baker et al., 2003; Kompa et al., 1999; Lowe et al., 2002) following further investigation (Kaumann et al., 2001; Kaumann et al., 1998;
Konkar et al., 2000a; Konkar et al., 2000b). This concept implies that β1AR can form two separate receptor conformations, a high-affinity conformation that is formed
Chapter 2 39
when (-)-CGP 12177 binds to the β1H site and acts as an antagonist to block the effects of catecholamines, and a low-affinity conformation that causes cardiostimulant effects, and is formed when (-)-CGP 12177 binds to the β1L site. Saturation and kinetic binding studies demonstrated that (-)-[3H]-CGP 12177 binds to two distinct sites in both heart (Sarsero et al., 2003) and recombinant β1AR
(Joseph et al., 2004b). It was postulated that the binding of (-)-CGP 12177 to β1HAR caused a conformational change in the receptor that inhibited the binding of catecholamines. In contrast, the binding of (-)-CGP 12177 to β1LAR causes its own distinct conformational change, that resulted in the observed agonist activity of non- conventional partial agonists (Kaumann et al., 2008). The high-affinity (β1HAR) and low-affinity (β1LAR) agonist states of the β1AR should not be confused with the high (R*) and low-affinity (R) GTP binding states, proposed from the ternary complex models (Bond et al., 1995; De Lean et al., 1980).
Elucidating the important structural components involved in agonist and antagonist binding to βARs has emerged as a critical area of research. The binding partners of catecholamines at β1HAR are now well established, however, limited structural information exists on the contact points between non-conventional partial agonists and β1LAR. A study that investigated the role of amino acids involved in catecholamine binding at β1AR revealed a role for Asp138 and Asn363 at both 1H- 3 and 1LAR (Baker et al., 2008). A complete loss of specific binding of (-)-[ H]-CGP 12177 was observed when the Asp138 residue was mutated to alanine, glutamate, histidine, asparagine or serine. In addition, no agonist responses were observed for (-)-isoprenaline and (-)-CGP 12177 when Asp138 was changed to alanine. Similarly, specific binding of (-)-[3H]-CGP 12177 and agonist activity of (-)-CGP 12177 was abolished when the Asn363 residue was mutated to alanine (Baker et al., 2008).
Interestingly, the proposed involvement of Asp138 in the low-affinity agonist binding of (-)-CGP 12177 is in marked contrast to that proposed previously, where the potency of (-)-CGP 12177 was reduced by only 5-fold and the affinity of (-)-bupranolol was reduced by only 0.4 log units when Asp138 was changed to glutamate (Joseph et al., 2004a). Furthermore, high-affinity antagonist binding of
40 Chapter 2
(-)-CGP 12177 (pKD = 9.4) measured at β1AR was reduced (pKD = 7.6) when Asp138 was mutated to glutamate. The potency of (-)-isoprenaline for increases in cAMP was decreased 500,000 fold at Glu138-1AR compared to Asp138-1AR and (-)-bupranolol antagonism (1 μM) was abolished (Joseph et al., 2004a). Based on these data, it was concluded that Asp138 contributes to ligand affinity and activity at
β1HAR not but β1LAR (Joseph et al., 2004a).
The common human 1AR polymorphic amino acids Arg389Gly differentially affect (-)-isoprenaline and (-)-CGP 12177 agonist responses at recombinant 1AR
(Joseph et al., 2004c). At Gly389-1ARs, the maximum cAMP response of
(-)-isoprenaline was reduced by 97% compared to Arg389-1ARs, while for (-)-CGP 12177 it was reduced by only 46%, making (-)-CGP 12177 a full agonist at Gly389-
1ARs (Joseph et al., 2004c). These studies have provided evidence to suggest that
(-)-isoprenaline through 1HAR and (-)-CGP 12177 through 1LAR, have different binding partners and stabilise different 1AR conformations that result varying levels of efficacy.
2.6.7 Functional and Clinical Implication of the β1L-Adrenoceptor
Cardiostimulation by non-conventional partial agonists through β1LAR has been observed in rat atrium (Kaumann et al., 1997b) and human heart (Kaumann, 1996). These effects are mediated through Gs-protein-cAMP-PKA pathway (Kaumann et al., 1997b; Sarsero et al., 2003), and have been shown to result in arrhythmias in murine ventricular myocytes (Lowe et al., 1998), presumably through
β1LAR (Kaumann et al., 2008). The activity of non-conventional partial agonists was reduced in the end stages of heart failure in both rat and human (Kompa et al., 1999; Sarsero et al., 2003), a result that was consistent with reduced binding density of
β1AR observed in end stage heart failure (Bristow et al., 1986; Brodde, 1991).
These observations may demonstrate why the effectiveness of β-blockers used in the treatment of heart failure is varied. A classic example of this is bucindolol, which unlike other clinically used β-blockers metoprolol (The MERIT-HF
Chapter 2 41
Investigators, 1999), bisoprolol (The CIBIS-II Investigators, 1999) and carvedilol (Packer et al., 1996; Packer et al., 2001) does not provide an overall benefit to heart failure patients (The Beta-Blocker Evaluation of Survival Trial Investigators, 2001).
It has been postulated that bucindolol may cause positive inotropic effects via β1LAR (Kaumann et al., 2008). Bucindolol has been shown to elicit cardiostimulation in human myocardium preparations in a propranolol insensitive manner (Bundkirchen et al., 2002). It has also been suggested that the partial agonist activity of bucindolol may cause arrhythmias via β1LAR (Kaumann et al., 2008). However the effects of chronic activation of β1LARs and the clinical mechanisms underlying the ineffectiveness of bucindolol in human heart failure have not been investigated.
Although 1H- and 1L- are separate states of 1AR, they can both cause cardiostimulant effects through activation of the Gs-protein-cAMP-PKA pathway.
Consequently, increased activity of 1LARs could be expected to contribute to the progression of heart failure. It is also possible that chronic activation of 1LAR may lead to cardiac dysfunction and heart failure (Molenaar et al., 2011; Tugiono et al., 2010), forming the basis of the development of β-blockers that effectively block the
β1LAR to be used in combination with current β1HAR β-blockers for treating heart failure.
It has been proposed that the unique pharmacology of (-)-CGP 12177, (-)-pindolol and derivatives is conferred by the presence of the benzimidazolone [(-)-CGP 12177] and indole [(-)-pindolol] groups. A common feature of these substituents is the common nitrogen atom at position 1 (Figure 2.11) which may be critical for agonist activity. Modifying this atom by steric hindrance or by changing the polarity may result in compounds that bind to β1LAR with reduced agonist effects. While these assertions are yet to be investigated, it is believed that identifying the molecular features that confer agonist activity of non-conventional partial agonists will lead to the development of novel compounds that block 1LAR with higher affinity (pK ~ 9) than those currently available (current pK 7).
42 Chapter 2
3 O N O N H 4 H 3 4 H N OH OH O 2 2 N 5 N 5 H 6 1 H 6 1 (-)-CGP 12177 (-)-Pindolol
Figure 2.11. Chemical structures of (-)-CGP 12177 and (-)-pindolol show the common nitrogen at position 1.
2.7 SUMMARY AND IMPLICATIONS
The literature review has provided a detailed insight into the structure and function of 1AR, the role of 1AR in human heart failure, the atypical pharmacology of 1AR and the existence of 1H- and 1LAR forms. Clearly demonstrated is the advancement and implementation of research methodology in the field of AR research that has significantly developed our current knowledge of AR activation and signalling. The research has revealed the complexity of these mechanisms and raised additional questions that require further investigation in order to understand the intricacies of these processes.
The literature review has demonstrated a clear knowledge gap with respect to
1AR pharmacology. The identification and subsequent characterisation of non- conventional partial agonists has been investigated for more than 30 years, however the existence of two forms of pharmacology at 1AR produced by a single ligand has not been conclusively explained. In the present study, the following research hypotheses and aims were formed:
The hypotheses of the project are that:
Non-conserved amino acids of 1- and 2AR in TMDV confer agonist
activity of (-)-CGP 12177 at the low-affinity site of the 1AR.
Chapter 2 43
Modification of non-conserved amino acids in TMDV of the 1AR will
alter the activity of (-)-CGP 12177 at the 1AR.
The benzimidazolone group of (-)-CGP 12177 and indole group of
(-)-pindolol are critical for agonist activity at 1LAR. Structural
modification will lead to the development of 1LAR antagonists.
The aims to address the hypotheses were to:
determine the effect of heterologous 1AR - 2AR TMDV amino acids on
agonist activity following substitution into the 1AR.
determine if the agonist properties of (-)-CGP 12177 are conferred by the substitution of the benzimidazolone group by investigating the properties of the structural isomer 5-[3-(tert-butylamino))2-hydroxypropoxy]1,3-
dihydro-2H-benzimidazol-2-one at recombinant 1AR.
The long term aim being:-
To develop a -blocker that can block 1LAR with higher affinity (pK ~ 9) than those currently available (current pK 7) for potential therapeutic use in heart failure.
44 Chapter 2
Chapter 3: Materials and Methods
3.1 RESEARCH DESIGN
Currently, the molecular attributes that distinguish β1LAR and β1HAR are not fully understood. Because the β2AR does not form a corresponding low-affinity binding site (Baker et al., 2002), it was hypothesised that TMDV amino acids of
1AR that are heterologous with respect to 2AR, might be critical for 1LAR and that their absence in 2AR prevents the existence of a corresponding “2LAR”.
Preliminary experiments targeted a broad region of the β1AR (TMDV) to determine whether this region is involved in the formation of β1LAR. This region was hypothesised as being a critical region based on pharmacological observations including:
1, The differing agonist activity of a series of compounds at 1LAR where, (-)-CGP 12177 > (-)-pindolol >>> (-)-propranolol (Figure 3.1).
2. The assumption that the agonist activity is conferred through the indole group (blue) of pindolol and benzimidazolone group of (-)-CGP 12177 (blue) and not (-O.CH2.CHOH.CH2.NH.CH(CH3)x, (where x = 2 or 3) since (-)-propranolol has no intrinsic activity while pindolol and (-)-CGP 12177 have agonist activity (Figure 3.1).
3. An assumption of the binding site of the position 1 nitrogens of the indole group of pindolol and benzimidazolone group of (-)-CGP 12177, predicted from the interaction of the catechol group of catecholamines with serines residues within
TMDV of 1ARs.
Chapter 3 45
O-CH2-CHOH-CH2-NH-CH(CH3)2
(-)-Propranolol
O-CH2-CHOH-CH2-NH-CH(CH3)2
(-)-Pindolol N O-CH2-CHOH-CH2-NH-C(CH3)3
N (-)-CGP 12177 O N
Figure 3.1. Structural considerations of -blockers with different agonist activity at
1LAR.
The generation of a 1/2TMDVAR chimera and subsequent analysis demonstrating altered intrinsic activity of (-)-CGP 12177, prompted further characterisation of this region using molecular modelling. A homology model of
1AR based on the crystal structure of β2AR-T4 lysozyme fusion protein identified two amino acid residues (Arg222, Val230) that could act alone or in combination to contribute to ligand binding/efficacy and confer the intrinsic activity of
(-)-CGP 12177 at 1LAR. It was proposed that by altering these residues to the corresponding 2AR residues (Arg222-1AR to Gln222 and Val230-1AR to Ile230), would affect the agonist activity of (-)-CGP 12177.
These two strategies have provided information about the 1LAR ligand binding site and have identified a region of the 1AR that contributes to the formation of 1LAR.
A modification of the original research design was implemented to include experiments that confirmed that the positive inotropic effects of (-)-CGP 12177 are mediated through 1LAR but not 3AR. The requirement for these experiments was evoked by a report published during the course of planned studies, which claimed that (-)-CGP 12177 increased ICa-L and contractile force through activation of 3AR
46 Chapter 3
(Skeberdis et al., 2008). This interpretation was based on results from human atrial myocytes in which (-)-CGP 12177 increased ICa-L, an effect that was reversed by the
3AR-selective antagonist L-748,337 (Candelore et al., 1999). The claim that the contractile effects of (-)-CGP 12177 were mediated through 3AR was not verified with L-748,337.
3.2 MATERIALS AND METHODS
3.2.1 General Reagents Molecular Biology General molecular biology reagents were purchased from the following vendors: Qiagen Spin Miniprep Kit, Qiagen Qiaquick Gel Extraction Kit, and Qiagen Plasmid Purification Kit from Qiagen (Doncaster, Australia); Macherey-Nagel Plasmid Mini Kit from Macherey-Nagel (Clayton, Australia); Expression vectors pBI-L and pTRE2hyg from Clonetech (Mountain View, CA); DNA polymerase (Klenow fragment), and T4 DNA ligase from Invitrogen (Mulgrave, Australia); Restriction enzymes HindIII, XbaI, EcoRV and Thermosensitive Alkaline Phosphatase from Promega (Alexandria, Australia); Stratagene QuikChange™ multi site-directed mutagenesis kit distributed by Integrated Sciences (Chatswood, Australia); Oligonucleotides used in mutagenesis polymerase chain reactions (PCR) and DNA sequencing were synthesised by Sigma (Castle Hill, Australia).
Cell Culture General cell culture reagents were purchased from the following vendors: CHOAA8 cell line from Clonetech (Mountain View, CA); Alpha Modified minimal essential medium from Lonza (Mt Waverly, Australia); Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium from Lonza or Invitrogen (Mulgrave, Australia); 10% heat inactivated tetracycline approved foetal calf serum (FCS) from Scientifix (Clayton, Australia); 1% penicillin/streptomycin, 1% L-Glutamine, 1% GlutaMAX-I, G418, hygromycin and trypsin/EDTA (0.25% trypsin (w/v), 0.913 mM EDTA) from Invitrogen (Mulgrave, Australia); doxycycline from Scientifix (Clayton, Australia); FuGene 6 transfection reagent from Roche Diagnostics (Castle Hill, Australia); sterile 1.5 ml
Chapter 3 47
eppendorf tubes from Quantum Scientific (Murarrie, Australia); 3 mm cloning discs and 1X cell freezing media-DMSO from Sigma Aldrich (Castle Hill, Australia).
Drugs Drugs were purchased from the following vendors: BRL 37344 [(RR + SS)[4- [2-[[2-(3-chlorophenyl)-2-hydroxy-ethyl]amino] propyl]phenoxy]acetic acid], (-)-CGP 12177 [(7)-4-(3-tertiarybutylamino-2-hydroxypropoxy) benzimidazol-2- one], IBMX (3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine), (-)-isoprenaline hydrochloride, (-)-nadolol, ICI 118,551 [1-[2,3-dihydro-7-methyl-1H-inden-4-yl] oxy-3-[(1- methylethyl) amino-2-butanol)], CGP 20712A [(2-hydroxy-S-[2-[[2-hydroxy-3-[4- [methyl-4-(trifluoromethyl)-1H-imidazol-2-yl]phenoxy]propyl]amino]ethoxy] benza- mide) were from Sigma Aldrich (Castle Hill, Australia); bisoprolol was from Merck KGaA (Darmstadt, Germany); (-)-[3H]-CGP 12177 (specific activity 30-60 Ci/mmol) from Perkin Elmer (Melbourne, Australia); (-)-bupranolol was a gift Dr Klaus Sandrock (Sanol-Schwarz, Monheim, Germany); L-748,337 [N- (3- [3-[2-(4- benzenesulphonylaminophenyl)ethylamino]-2- hydroxyl-propoxy]benzyl acetamide was a gift from Prof. Alberto Kaumann (University of Cambridge). See Appendix A for list of chemical structures.
Buffers If a pH value is stated, the baseline value was obtained using a labChem-TPS pH electrode (TPS Pty. Ltd. Brisbane, Australia), before addition of either 1 M HCl or 2 M NaOH to obtain the desired pH:
Phosphate-buffered saline (PBS): 137 mM NaCl, 10 mM sodium phosphate buffer, 2.7 mM KCl (pH 7.4).
Tris-acetate-EDTA (TAE): 40 mM Tris-acetate, 1 mM EDTA (pH 8.0).
Agarose gel loading dye: 0.09% (w/v) bromophenol blue, 0.09% (w/v) xylene cyanol FF, 60% (v/v) glycerol, 60 mM EDTA, 1 M Tris (pH 7.6).
Tris-Incubation buffer: 5 mM EGTA, 1 mM EDTA, 4 mM MgCl2, 1 mM ascorbic acid, 0.5 mM phenyl-methyl-sulfonyl fluoride, 50 mM Tris HCl, (pH 7.7).
48 Chapter 3
Modified Krebs buffer: 125 mM Na+, 5 mM K+, 2.25 mM Ca2+, 0.5 mM Mg2+, 98.5 − 2- - 2- mM Cl , 0.5 mM SO4 , 29 mM HCO3 , 1 mM HPO4 , 0.04 mM EDTA, and equilibrated with 95% O2/5% CO2
Cyclic AMP assay buffer: 0.05 M acetate, 0.02% (w/v) Bovine Serum Albumin, 0.01% (w/v) preservative (pH 5.8).
Cyclic AMP lysis buffer 1B: 0.25% dodecyltrimethylammonium bromide.
Cyclic AMP wash buffer: 0.01 M phosphate containing 0.05% (w/v) Tween 20 (pH 7.5)
Bacterial Culture Bacterial culture was performed in Luria-Bertani (LB) broth [1% (w/v) Bacto- Tryptone 0.5% (w/v) Bacto-yeast extract and 0.5% (w/v) NaCl, pH 7.0]. Construct
DNA (1AR, 2AR or modified 1AR gene cloned into pCDNA3.1, pBI-L or pTRE2hyg) was transformed into Library Efficiency DH5™ competent cells from Invitrogen (Mulgrave, Australia). Ligation reactions were transformed into One Shot® MAX Efficiency® DH5™ competent cells from Invitrogen (Mulgrave, Australia). Mutagenesis reactions were transformed into XL-10 Gold ultra-competent cells (provided in the Stratagene QuikChange™ multi site-directed mutagenesis kit). Transformation and growth conditions are detailed in the General Methods section.
Cyclic AMP assays Cyclic AMP assays were performed using reagents supplied in the GE Healthcare Biotrak cAMP enzyme-immunoassay kit (GE Healthcare Bio-sciences Pty. Ltd., Rydalmere, Australia) following the manufacturer’s instructions (RPN225). Kit reagents were equilibrated to room temperature prior to use. The cAMP standard was prepared by addition of 2 ml lysis 1B buffer. The final solution contained cAMP at a concentration of 32 pmol/ml. The concentrations of cAMP required for the standard curve were obtained by diluting the cAMP solution in lysis buffer 1B. The anti-cAMP serum was prepared by adding 11 ml of lysis buffer 2B (components of lysis buffer 2B not provided by the manufacturer). The cAMP- horseradish peroxidase conjugate was made up in 11 ml of diluted assay buffer.
Chapter 3 49
3.2.2 General Methods
It is acknowledged that the generation of 1AR and 2AR recombinant clones and 1/2TMDVAR chimera were performed by Dr Annalese Semmler. The
1(V230I)AR, 1(R222Q)AR, 1(S228A)AR, 1(S229A)AR and 1(S232A)AR were generated by Kelly Chee and Dr Annalese Semmler. I performed the recombinant techniques associated with the generation of 1(V230A)AR and subcloned the
1(S232A)AR modified DNA fragment from pCDNA3.1 into pTRE2hyg.
Molecular Biology
Generating 1AR and 2AR recombinant clones
A 1 wild-type construct (1pBI-L) was created as described by Kaumann et al., (2007). In addition two plasmids containing either a full-length ~1.3 Kb wild type 1AR or a full-length ~1.2 Kb wild type 2AR cloned into the HindIII/XbaI site of pCDNA3.1, were kindly donated by Professor Roger Summer’s laboratory
(Monash University, Australia). It is noted that the 1AR gene used in both constructs (pBI-L and pTRE2hyg) contained the Arg389 genotype.
The cDNA fragments were subcloned into pBI-L and/or pTRE2hyg cloning vectors (Clonetech, Australia). The 1- or AR construct DNA was transformed into Library Efficiency DH5™ competent cells by standard heat shock procedure. Briefly, the cells were thawed on ice and 50 l aliquots of cells were mixed with ~1 l construct DNA (10 ng) in ice cold 1.5 ml eppendorf tubes and incubated on ice for a further 30 min. The cells were then heat shocked for 20 sec in a 42oC water bath and chilled on ice for 2 min. LB broth (950 l) was added to transformed cells which were then incubated at 225 rpm for 1 hr at 37oC. The transformed culture (2.5-100 l) was plated on 1.5% LB ampicillin agar plates and incubated overnight at 37oC. Single colonies were selected and inoculated into 5 ml LB broth supplemented with ampicillin (100 g/ml) and incubated overnight at 37oC with shaking at 225 rpm. The overnight cultures were minipreped using the Qiagen Spin Miniprep Kit or the Macherey-Nagel Plasmid Mini Kit using the manufacturer’s instructions. Agarose loading dye was added to 1 l of the samples and the DNA was visualised
50 Chapter 3
by gel electrophoresis with 0.8% (w/v) TAE agarose gels containing ethidium bromide (0.5 g/ml). The gels were run in TAE buffer at 100 V for 40-60 min.
The wild type 1AR or wild type 2AR gene fragments were then excised from pCDNA3.1 as HindIII/XbaI fragments and were separated by gel electrophoresis as detailed above. The gene fragments were then excised from the agarose gel and purified using the Qiagen Qiaquick Gel Extraction Kit as per the manufacturer’s protocol. Prior to ligation, the purified gene inserts were treated with DNA polymerase (Klenow fragment) to create blunt ends. Reactions contained 10 l purified DNA insert (0.5-1 g), 1.5 l of 10 X Klenow reaction buffer, 0.2 l acetylated BSA (10 mg/ml), 0.8 l dNTP (1 mM), 10 l DNA polymerase (Klenow fragment, 0.5 U/l) and made up to a total of 15 l with nuclease free H2O. Reactions were incubated at room temperature for 15 min. The vector DNA (pBI-L or pTRE2hyg) was linearised using EcoRV (Promega, Australia) and dephosphorylated with Thermosensitive Alkaline Phosphatase (TSAP, Promega, Australia) following the manufacturer’s protocol. All DNA fragments were electrophoresed and purified as above. DNA concentrations were determined by spectrophotometric analysis at λ=260 nm.
Ligation of the blunt-ended genes into the EcoRV site of the respective cloning vectors was performed using T4 DNA ligase following the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, purified DNA inserts were ligated to the pBI-L or pTRE2hyg vector at molar ratios of 3:1 and 2:1 (DNA insert : Vector DNA). Ligation reactions were prepared using 3 l of 5 X ligase reaction buffer, 2 l vector DNA (50 ng), 1 l of T4 DNA ligase (5 U/l), required molar equivalent of DNA insert and made to a o total of 15 l with H2O. Reactions were incubated overnight at 14 C and transformed into One Shot® MAX Efficiency® DH5™ competent cells by heat shock. This involved the addition of the ligation reaction (5 l) to a 50 l vial of One Shot® cells, which was incubated on ice for 30 min and subsequently heat shocked for 30 sec at 42oC. The transformed cells were then incubated in 250 l of SOC medium (2% (w/v) Bacto Tryptone, 0.5% yeast extract, 10 mM NaCl, 2.5 mM KCl, 10 mM o MgCl2, 10 mM MgSO4 and 20 mM glucose) and shaken at 225 rpm for 1 hr at 37 C.
Chapter 3 51
The transformed cultures (100-200 l) were plated on 1.5% LB ampicillin agar plates and incubated overnight at 37oC. Single colonies were selected and inoculated into ~1 ml LB broth supplemented with ampicillin (100 g/ml) and incubated overnight at 37oC with shaking (225 rpm). The overnight cultures were minipreped and visualised by gel electrophoresis as detailed previously. Restriction mapping of the purified construct DNA was performed to identify clones containing the insert in the correct orientation.
The 1ARpTRE2hyg, 1ARpBI-L, 2ARpBI-L and 2ARpTRE2hyg clones were sequence verified by di-deoxy sequencing using the ABI BigDye Terminator kit at either the Australian Genome Research Facility (AGRF) or the Griffith University DNA Sequencing Facility (GUDSF). A sequence reaction consisted of 2 l BigDye terminator mix, 3.2 pmol of specific sequencing primer, 400-600 ng of construct DNA and was made up to 20 l with nuclease free H2O. Following an initial denaturation period of 96oC for 1 min, cycling conditions of 90oC for 10 sec, 50oC for 5 sec and 60oC for 4 min were repeated for 30 cycles. The sequencing products were precipitated in a 1.5 ml eppendorf tube containing 5 l of 125 mM EDTA, pH 8.0. The tubes were vortexed and quickly spun, then 60 l of 100% ethanol was added and the tubes were vortexed and respun. The samples were incubated at room temperature for 15 min and then centrifuged at 16,000 X g. The supernatant was removed and the pellet was washed with 250 l of 70% ethanol and subsequently centrifuged at 16,000 X g for 5 min. The supernatant was removed and the pellets were left to air dry.
Generating 1/2TMDVAR chimera recombinant clone
Using the donated 1pCDNA3.1 clone, the 1/2TMDVAR chimera was created by 3 successive rounds of multi site-directed mutagenesis (using the QuikChange™ multi site-directed mutagenesis kit following the manufacturer’s instructions) to change the 5 amino acids that are not conserved between the 1 and 2 TMDV (RVCAL to QIVVS, Figure 3.2). All reagents were provided in the kit unless otherwise stated. To obtain the desired substitution, primers were designed (using the Quikchange primer design program www.agilent.com/genomics/qcpd) which
52 Chapter 3
incorporated single base pair changes, which would then enable this change to be incorporated in the wild-type 1AR construct during the PCR process (Table 3.1).
Figure 3.2. The 1/2TMDVAR chimera was prepared by substitution of the 5 heterologous amino acids of 2AR TMDV into 1AR.
Table 3.1
Primers Used to Generate 1AR Mutations Primer Sequence (5’ to 3’)
1/2TMDV 1 GACTTCGTCACCAACCAGGCCTACGCCATCGCC
1/2TMDV 2 ATCGCCTCGTCCATAGTCTCCTTCTACGTGC
1/2TMDV 3 CCTTCTACGTGCCCCTGGTCATCATGGCCTTCGTGTACC
1/2TMDV 4 CCCTGGTCATCATGGTCTTCGTGTACCTGCG
1/2TMDV 5 ATCATGGTCTTCGTGTACTCGCGGGTGTTCC
R222Q GACTTCGTCACCAACCAGGCCTACGCCATCGCC
V230I GCCATCGCCTCGTCCATAGTCTCCTTCTACG
V230A CATCGCCTCGTCCGCAGTCTCCTTCTACG
S228A CTACGCCATCGCCGCGTCCGTAGTCTC
S229A CGCCATCGCCTCGGCCGTAGTCTCCTT
S232A CCTCGTCCGTAGTCGCCTTCTACGTGCCC *Bold underlined letters indicate changed nucleotides
Chapter 3 53
The PCRs were performed in a PTC-200 Peltier thermal cycler DNA Engine (Bresatec, South Australia). The PCRs (25 l) contained 2.5 l 10 X Quikchange Multi reaction buffer, 0.75 l Quikchange solution, 1 l dNTP mix, 0.8 l DNA template (100 ng), 1 l of specific mutagenesis primer (100 ng) (Table 3.1), 1 l
Quikchange multienzyme blend and 17.75 l H20. PCR amplification was performed using an initial denaturation period of 95oC for 1 min, followed by 30 cycles of 95oC for 1 min, 55oC for 1 min and 65oC for 14 min. The amplification products were treated with 1 l DpnI (10 U/ml) and incubated for 1 hr at 37oC to digest parental template.
The mutagenesis reactions were then transformed into XL-10 Gold ultra- competent cells by heat shock. For each reaction, 45 l of cells were aliquoted into a pre-chilled Falcon 2059 tube (Integrated Sciences, Australia), followed by addition of 2 l of -mercaptoethanol mix. Cells were incubated for 10 min on ice and gently swirled every 2 min. The DpnI treated DNA (4 l) was added to the cells which were gently swirled and then incubated for 30 min on ice. The cells were heat shocked in a 42oC water bath for 30 sec then incubated on ice for 2 min. The transformed cells were incubated in 500 l of pre-warmed (42oC) NZY+ broth (1% (w/v) casein hydrolysate, 0.5% (w/v) Bacto-yeast extract, 0.5% (w/v) NaCl, 12.5 mM MgCl2, o 12.5 mM MgSO4, 20 mM glucose, pH 7.5) and shaken at 250 rpm for 1 hr at 37 C. The transformation cultures (10-200 l) were plated on 1.5% LB ampicillin agar plates and incubated overnight at 37oC. Single colonies were selected and inoculated into 2 ml LB broth supplemented with ampicillin (100 g/ml) and incubated overnight at 37oC with shaking (225 rpm). The overnight cultures were minipreped and visualised by gel electrophoresis as detailed earlier. Following each round of site-directed mutagenesis, the nucleotide changes were confirmed by sequence analysis as described earlier. The chimeric gene was then subcloned from pCDNA3.1 into pBI-L and confirmed by sequence analysis as detailed above.
54 Chapter 3
Generating 1(V230I)AR, 1(V230A)AR, 1(R222Q)AR, 1(S228A)AR, 1(S229A)AR and 1(S232A)AR recombinant clones
The 1(V230I)AR, 1(V230A)AR, 1(R222Q)AR, 1(S228A)AR,
1(S229A)AR and 1(S232A)AR clones were created using site-directed mutagenesis as detailed previously. The first clone contained a change to the valine at amino acid position 230 into the corresponding isoleucine found in 2AR
(1(V230I)AR). The second clone contained a valine to alanine change at amino acid position 230 (1(V230A)AR), the third clone had a substitution of arginine to glutamine at amino acid position 222 (1(R2222Q)AR), whilst the conserved serines at positions 228, 229, and 232 were changed to alanine in the clones 1(S228A)AR,
1(S229A)AR and 1(S232A)AR. All changes were confirmed by di-deoxy sequencing as detailed earlier and the modified genes were then subcloned from pCDNA3.1 into pTRE2hyg as detailed above and confirmed by sequence analysis.
Cell Culture Cell maintenance All cell culture procedures were performed in a PS2 laminar flow hood under sterile conditions using sterile equipment. The CHOAA8 cell line (Chinese Hamster Ovary cell line that expresses the tetracycline-controlled transactivator) was used in transfections. Cells were grown on sterile 10 cm2 plates (Corning®, distributed by Sigma Aldrich, Castle Hill Australia) in growth medium [Alpha Modified minimal essential medium (MEM), supplemented with 10% heat inactivated tetracycline approved foetal calf serum (FCS), 1% penicillin/streptomycin and 1% L-Glutamine o or 1% GlutaMAX-I] at 37 C in an atmosphere containing 5% CO2. For CHOAA8 cells stably expressing receptors, G418 (100 g/ml) and hygromycin (400 g/ml) were added to the growth medium. Doxycycline (1 mg/ml) was only used during the selection of the stable transfectants to inhibit gene transcription.
CHOAA8 cells were removed from plates every 2 to 4 days (depending on cell growth) by the addition of 1.5 ml trypsin/EDTA (0.25% trypsin (w/v), 0.913 mM EDTA). Cells were grown until 70-95% confluency was reached. At this point, the media was discarded and cells washed twice with 5 ml MEM. The washed cells
Chapter 3 55
were detached by adding 1.5 ml of trypsin/EDTA followed by incubation for 4 min at 37oC. The reaction was halted by addition of 5 ml MEM containing 10% FCS. The cell suspension was pelleted by centrifugation for 5 min at 100 X g. The supernatant was removed and the cell pellet resuspended in fresh media.
Cell counting Cells were trypsinised and resuspended in fresh growth medium. The cell suspension was diluted (1:1) in PBS and 10 l transferred to a haemocytometer. The suspension dispersed by capillary action between the haemocytometer and the cover slip. Counting was performed using established protocols (Freshney, 1994).
Transient transfection of CHOAA8 cells Prior to transfection, suitably purified DNA was prepared using the Qiagen Plasmid Purification Kit following the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA concentrations were determined by spectrophotometric analysis at λ=260 nm. CHOAA8 cells for transfection were grown in antibiotic free growth medium. Transfection into CHOAA8 cells was performed in 6-well plates, with cells seeded at a density of 1x105 cells/well in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) and cultured overnight to achieve ~50% confluence.
Before transfection, the FuGene 6 transfection reagent was warmed to room temperature. The transfection mix was prepared in sterile 1.5 ml eppendorf tubes using DMEM, Fugene 6 transfection reagent and purified construct DNA in a total volume of 100 l. The ratios of reagent (l) : DNA (g) used were 3:1, 3:2 and 6:1. Initially, the required volume of Fugene 6 transfection reagent was added to each tube containing DMEM and incubated for 5 min at room temperature. The construct DNA was then added to each tube to form the transfection complex. The complex was incubated for 60 min at room temperature. The cells were removed from the incubator and each complex was added to the designated well in the plate, then the cells were returned to the incubator. At 24 and 48 hrs post transfection, cells were trypsinised by adding 0.5 ml of trypsin/EDTA followed by incubation for 2.5 min at 37oC. Cells from each well were pooled and pelleted at 100 X g for 5 min and
56 Chapter 3
resuspended in 1 ml of ice cold Tris-Incubation buffer. Cells were stored at -80oC and subsequently analysed by radioligand binding.
Generation of CHOAA8 cells stably expressing human 1AR, 2AR or mutant ARs To generate stable transfectants, CHOAA8 cell transfection was performed using the aforementioned protocol. At 48 hrs post transfection, each well was washed twice with 2 ml of MEM. The cells were lifted by adding 0.5 ml of trypsin/EDTA followed by incubation for 2.5 min at 37oC. The reaction was then halted with 2 ml of MEM containing 10% FCS. The cells from each well were pelleted by centrifugation at 100 X g for 5 min. The supernatant was removed and cell pellets were resuspended in 1 ml of growth medium containing G418 (100 g/ml), doxycycline (1 mg/ml) and hygromycin (400 g/ml). The 10 cm2 plates were seeded with 500 l, 100 l, 50 l or 10 l of the appropriate cell suspension and 10 ml of fresh growth medium was added to each plate. Different volumes of cell suspension were used to ensure good separation of colonies. A media change was performed every 3 days and doxycycline was replenished every 2 days.
Stable hygromycin-resistant colonies formed over a 2-4 week period. Between 30 and 80 stable cell clones were selected from each transfection. Microscopy was used to identify well spaced single colonies. These colonies were selected using 3 mm cloning discs soaked in trypsin/EDTA. A disc was placed over a single colony and incubated for 10 min at 37oC. Each disc was then removed and placed into a single well of a 24 well plate containing 1 ml of growth medium supplemented with G418 (100 g/ml), doxycycline (1 mg/ml) and hygromycin (400 g/ml). Colony collection was confirmed by microscopy. The 24 well plate containing selected clones was cultured at 37oC. The cells received a media change every 3 days and fresh doxycycline every 2 days.
When the transfected cells had reached ~80% confluency they were trypsinised, transferred to 10 cm2 plates containing 10 ml of growth medium supplemented with G418 (100 g/ml), doxycycline (1 mg/ml) and hygromycin (400
Chapter 3 57
g/ml), cultured at 37oC and allowed to grow to ~80% confluency. The cells were then trypsinised and either resuspended in 1 ml of cell freezing media-DMSO 1X, o stored overnight at -80 C in a cyrovessel and then transferred to liquid N2 for storage, or passaged onto new 10 cm2 plates containing fresh growth media, supplemented with G418 (100 g/ml) and hygromycin (400 g/ml) at 37oC. Doxycycline, which inhibits gene transcription in the pTRE2hyg Tet-off expression system was discontinued at this point. Transient and stable transfections of 1(V230I)AR,
1(V230A)AR, 1(R222Q)AR were performed by myself, while 1AR,
2AR,1(S228A)AR, 1(S229A)AR and 1(S232A)AR transfections were performed by Kelly Chee and Dr Annalese Semmler.
3.2.3 Radioligand Binding Experiments Cell membrane preparation Cells were trypsinised by the addition of 1.5 ml trypsin/EDTA when 70-95% confluency was reached. The resulting cell pellets were resuspended in 3 ml of ice cold Tris-Incubation buffer. The cell suspension was pelleted by centrifugation for 10 min at 200 X g at 4oC. The supernatant was removed and the cells were resuspended in fresh buffer and re-centrifuged. The supernatant was again removed and each pellet was resuspended in 1.5 ml of Tris-Incubation buffer, then spilt into 2 X 750 l aliquots and stored at -80oC.
The cells were disrupted using a Kinematica Polytron PT 2100 (7 mm probe, 1 x 3 sec, speed setting 10). Cell membranes were than isolated by centrifugation for 15 min at 51,500 X g at 4°C. Fresh Tris-incubation buffer (3 ml) was added to membrane pellets which were than homogenised by Polytron (settings as above). The volume of cell suspension was made up to between 7-20 ml depending on the type of binding assay.
Single point binding Single point binding was used as a screening tool to estimate the receptor density of clones from transfection. Each homogenate was incubated for 2 hr at 37°C
58 Chapter 3
in a final volume of 0.25 ml containing a final concentration of 2 nM 3 (-)-[ H]-CGP 12177 (specific activity 30-60 Ci/mmol) for 1AR (pBI-L and pTRE2hyg), 2AR (pBI-L and pTRE2hyg), 1/2TMDVAR, 1(V230I)AR,
1(V230A)AR, 1(R222Q)AR and 1(S232A)AR, 10 nM for 1(S229A)AR and
70 nM for 1(S228A)AR. Non-specific binding was measured in the presence of 200 μM (-)-isoprenaline. Bound radioligand was isolated by filtration through Whatman GF/B paper and radioactivity counted in 10 ml Ultima Gold™ scintillation cocktail (Perkin Elmer, Melbourne, Australia) using a Tri-Carb 2800TR scintillation counter (Perkin Elmer, Melbourne, Australia).
Saturation binding To identify cell lines expressing receptors to approximate densities observed for 1AR and 2AR in human heart (~70 and ~30 fmol/mg protein respectively, reviewed in Brodde, 1991), saturation binding experiments were carried out with 3 0.02 nM – 10 nM (-)-[ H]-CGP 12177 for cell lines 1AR (pBI-L and pTRE2hyg),
2AR (pBI-L and pTRE2hyg), 1/2TMDVAR, 1(V230I)AR, 1(V230A)AR,
1(R222Q)AR and 1(S232A)AR. The concentration ranges for 1(S228A)AR and 3 1(S229A)AR were 0.5 nM – 80 nM and 0.1 nM – 40 nM (-)-[ H]-CGP 12177 respectively. All saturation experiments were performed in the presence of 0.1 mM GTP (Roche Diagnostics, Castle Hill, Australia). Non-specific binding was determined in the presence of 200 μM (-)-isoprenaline. Bound radioligand was isolated and radioactivity counted as detailed above.
Competition binding Competition binding experiments between known AR ligands and (-)-[3H]-CGP 12177 were performed to generate a pharmacological profile of CHOAA8 cell membranes expressing wild-type or mutant ARs. Cell membranes containing 1AR (pBI-L), 2AR (pBI-L), 1/2TMDVAR, 1(V230I)AR, 3 1(V230A)AR, 1(R222Q)AR were labelled with 0.5 nM (-)-[ H]-CGP 12177, whilst 1(S228A)AR, 1(S229A)AR and 1(S232A)AR were labelled with 10 nM, 2.5 nM and 1 nM respectively, in the absence and presence of the competing agents
Chapter 3 59
ICI 118, 551 (0.1 nM-100 M), CGP 20712A (1 aM-100 M). Competition binding experiments using (-)-bupranolol (10 pM-10 M) or bisoprolol (0.2 nM-100 M) were carried out for 1AR, 2AR and 1/2TMDVAR. Bound radioligand was isolated and radioactivity counted as above. Assays were carried out in triplicate and replicated at least 4 times. Results are presented as mean ± s.e. mean.
The amount of protein was determined for all samples used in radioligand binding experiments using the method of Bradford (Bradford, 1976).
Analysis of single point binding data In order to screen large numbers of transfection clones, a single concentration of radioligand was used to estimate the receptor density using the equation below: