DOCSLIB.ORG

NI 43-101 Moss Gold-Silver Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
NI 43-101 Moss Gold-Silver Project M3-PN150019 Issue Date: 22 November 2017 Moss Gold-Silver Project NI 43-101 Technical Report Preliminary Economic Analysis Phase III, Mine Life Extension Mohave County, Arizona Prepared For: Qualified Persons: David Stone, P.E. Thomas L. Drielick, P.E. Daniel K. Roth, P.E. Robert G. Cuffney, CPG Michael Grass, P.E. Thomas L. Dyer, P.E. MOSS GOLD-SILVER PROJECT FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT DATE AND SIGNATURES PAGE The issue date of this report is November 22, 2017. See Appendix A for certificates of qualified persons. (Signed) “David Stone” November 22, 2017 David Stone, P.E. Date (Signed) “Thomas L. Drielick” November 22, 2017 Thomas L. Drielick, P.E. Date (Signed) “Daniel K. Roth” November 22, 2017 Daniel K. Roth, P.E. Date (Signed) “Robert G. Cuffney” November 22, 2017 Robert G. Cuffney, CPG Date (Signed) “Michael Grass” November 22, 2017 Michael Grass, P.E. Date (Signed) “Thomas L. Dyer” November 22, 2017 Thomas L. Dyer, P.E. Date M3-PN150019 22 November 2017 i MOSS GOLD-SILVER PROJECT FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT MOSS GOLD-SILVER PROJECT FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE DATE AND SIGNATURES PAGE ............................................................................................................................................. I TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................................................................ II LIST OF FIGURES AND ILLUSTRATIONS ............................................................................................................................ IX LIST OF TABLES .................................................................................................................................................................... XII 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 ISSUER .......................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 MOSS MINE PROJECT .................................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 THIS TECHNICAL REPORT .............................................................................................................................. 1 1.4 GEOLOGY ...................................................................................................................................................... 2 1.5 2014 MINERAL RESOURCES .......................................................................................................................... 2 1.6 MINERAL RESERVES ..................................................................................................................................... 2 1.7 METALLURGY ................................................................................................................................................ 3 1.8 MINING .......................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.9 PROCESSING ................................................................................................................................................. 3 1.10 INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICES ................................................................................................................. 4 1.11 CAPITAL COSTS ............................................................................................................................................ 4 1.12 OPERATING COSTS ....................................................................................................................................... 4 1.13 FINANCIAL ANALYSIS .................................................................................................................................... 5 1.14 QUALIFIED PERSONS OPINION ....................................................................................................................... 5 2 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................................... 6 2.1 SOURCES OF INFORMATION ........................................................................................................................... 6 2.2 QUALIFIED PERSONS ..................................................................................................................................... 7 2.3 TERMS AND DEFINITIONS ............................................................................................................................... 8 3 RELIANCE ON OTHER EXPERTS ......................................................................................................................... 10 4 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION ...................................................................................................... 11 4.1 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION ................................................................................................... 11 4.2 PROPERTY LOCATION ................................................................................................................................. 12 4.3 MINERAL TENURE ........................................................................................................................................ 12 Patented Claims .............................................................................................................. 12 Unpatented Lode Claims ................................................................................................ 13 M3-PN150019 22 November 2017 ii MOSS GOLD-SILVER PROJECT FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT Claim and Permit Overlaps ............................................................................................ 21 4.4 TAXES, MAINTENANCE FEES, AND RENT ..................................................................................................... 22 Patented Lode Claims .................................................................................................... 22 Unpatented Lode Claims ................................................................................................ 22 Arizona State Exploration Permit ................................................................................. 22 4.5 PRINCIPAL AGREEMENTS ............................................................................................................................ 22 MinQuest Agreement ...................................................................................................... 22 2011 Patriot Gold Agreement ........................................................................................ 23 2016 Patriot Gold Sale Agreement................................................................................ 24 La Cuesta Agreement ..................................................................................................... 24 4.6 ROYALTIES .................................................................................................................................................. 25 MinQuest, Inc. .................................................................................................................. 25 Greenwood Agreement .................................................................................................. 26 Finders Agreement ......................................................................................................... 26 La Cuesta International, Inc. .......................................................................................... 27 Patriot Gold ...................................................................................................................... 27 Property Access Agreement ......................................................................................... 27 4.7 ENVIRONMENTAL LIABILITIES ...................................................................................................................... 28 Historical Liabilities ........................................................................................................ 28 Phase I Liabilities ............................................................................................................ 28 4.8 PERMIT HISTORY/BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................. 28 Phase I .............................................................................................................................. 28 Phase II ............................................................................................................................. 29 Jurisdictional Washes .................................................................................................... 29 Property Access .............................................................................................................. 29 Aquifer Protection Permits (APP) – AZ DEQ ............................................................... 30 Air Quality Permit – AZ DEQ .......................................................................................... 30 4.9 FACTORS AND RISKS (QUALIFIED PERSON’S OPINION) .............................................................................. 30 5 ACCESSIBILITY,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Strategic Long-Range Transportation Plan for the Colorado River Indian
    2014 Strategic Long Range Transportation Plan for the Colorado River Indian Tribes Final Report Prepared by: Prepared for: COLORADO RIVER INDIAN TRIBES APRIL 2014 Project Management Team Arizona Department of Transportation Colorado River Indian Tribes 206 S. 17th Ave. 26600 Mohave Road Mail Drop: 310B Parker, Arizona 85344 Phoenix, AZ 85007 Don Sneed, ADOT Project Manager Greg Fisher, Tribal Project Manager Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Telephone: 602-712-6736 Telephone: (928) 669-1358 Mobile: (928) 515-9241 Tony Staffaroni, ADOT Community Relations Project Manager Email: [email protected] Phone: (602) 245-4051 Project Consultant Team Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 333 East Wetmore Road, Suite 280 Tucson, AZ 85705 Mary Rodin, AICP Email: [email protected] Telephone: 520-352-8626 Mobile: 520-256-9832 Field Data Services of Arizona, Inc. 21636 N. Dietz Drive Maricopa, Arizona 85138 Sharon Morris, President Email: [email protected] Telephone: 520-316-6745 This report has been funded in part through financial assistance from the Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation. The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data, and for the use or adaptation of previously published material, presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the Arizona Department of Transportation or the Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. Trade or manufacturers’ names that may appear herein are cited only because they are considered essential to the objectives of the report.
    [Show full text]
  • D J -B Vy Li' /^/ RECEIVED 2280 Q] NFS Form 10-900 *B Fl 0 (Rev
    D j -b vy Li' /^/ RECEIVED 2280 Q] NFS Form 10-900 *B fl 0 (Rev. 10-90) OCT United States Department of the Inte: •ior FE82 81996 National Park Service if NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES NAT REGISTE H STQRIC PLACES NATION/1% * I SERVICE „ NATIONAL PARK SERV,. • REGISTRATION FORM jjAriONAL REGISTER Rfte This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties—' and districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NFS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property historic name Camp Date Creek 1868-1873 other names/site number Camp McPherson 1867-1868 2. Location street & number SE1/4 Sec. 30, NE1/4 Sec. 31, T11N,R6W / /not for publication______ city or town Hawkins area in vicinity of Hawkins Ranch and Date Creek___/X/ Vicinity between the present towns of Hillside and Congress____________________________ state Arizona code AZ county Yavapai code 025 zip code none* *Nearest P.O. is Congress, AZ 85332 3. Classification Ownership of Property Category of Property No. of Resources w/in Property /X/ private /X/ building(s) Contributing Noncontributing / / public-local / / district __ ___ buildings /X/ public-State /X/ site 1 ___ sites / / public-Federal / / structure __ _____ structures / / object ______ objects I Total Name of related multiple property listing: Number of contributing resources previously listed in the National Register: Q 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Phonology and Dictionary of Yavapai
    Phonology and Dictionary of Yavapai By Alan William Shaterian A.B. (Syracuse University) 1963 C.Phil. (University of California) 1973 DISSERTATION Submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in Linguistics in the GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY Approved: Chairmai Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. YAVAPAI PHONOLOGY AND DICTIONARY Copyright @ 1983 by Alan Shaterian Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. DEDICATION For Jeanie Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. YAVAPAI PHONOLOGY AND DICTIONARY by Alan Shaterian ABSTRACT This work will preserve the fundamental facts about the Yavapai language, the most evanescent of the Pai group of Yuman languages, a linguistic family which in its vari­ ety of members and geographic distribution is analagous to the Germanic family as of five centuries ago. The dis­ sertation explores the relationship between the pattern of speech sounds and the shape of words in Yavapai. It de­ scribes the phonology, morphology, and a part of the lex­ icon in a format which is accessible to linguists of varied theoretical backgrounds. It is the speech of Chief Grace Jimulla Mitchell (1903-1976), a speaker of the Prescott subdialect of North­ eastern Yavapai, that forms the basis of the description. The research necessary for this undertaking was spon­ sored in part by the Survey of California and Other Indian Languages at the University of California at Berkeley. The Introduction surveys the field of Yavapai and Pai studies and places them within the deeper perspective of 1 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner.
    [Show full text]
  • Colorado River Indian Tribes SDPI
    SPECIAL DIABETES PROJECT-RECREATION PROGRAM SDP-REC FACILITIES The goal of the CRIT SDP-REC Program is to increase physi- cal activity among Native Americans enrolled in a federal recognized tribe living within the boundaries of the CRIT Building 1 Building 2 Irataba Hall reservation to prevent diabetes and to help individuals manage their diabetes with exercise. The Program has three facilities that include two workout centers and a gymnasium. These facilities feature 25 cardio machines, 40 strength training machines, and a gymnasium for team sports. Individuals receive fitness and exercise education from certified Fitness Instructors as well as nutrition and diabetes education from our Community Health Educator. COLORADO RIVER INDIAN TRIBES The Colorado River Indian Tribes is a geo-political unit consisting of the four distinct tribes associated with the Colorado River Indian Reservation: NUTRITION EDUCATION Chemehuevi, Mohave, Hopi, and Navajo. The reservation covers 432.22 COMMUNITY EVENTS The SDP Program, in collaboration with IHS, pro- square miles of land in Riverside and San Bernardino counties in California, Volleyball Leagues & Tournaments vides nutrition education to its participants. Partici- and La Paz County in Arizona. Today, the tribe has about 4,200 active (or Basketball Leagues & Tournaments enrolled) members. Most reside in communities in and around Parker and pants receive information on the basic food Baseball/Softball Leagues & Tournaments Poston, AZ. The largest community is the town of Parker. The 2000 census groups, portions size, meal planning and prepara- Youth Leagues & Tournaments tion in a classroom setting and on an individual ba- reported a population of 9,201 persons residing on the reservation.
    [Show full text]
  • General Crook's Administration in Arizona, 1871-75
    General Crook's administration in Arizona, 1871-75 Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Bahm, Linda Weldy Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 29/09/2021 11:58:29 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/551868 GENERAL CROOK'S ADMINISTRATION IN ARIZONA, 1871-75 by Linda Weldy Bahm A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 19 6 6 STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This thesis has been submitted in partial fu lfill ment of requirements for an advanced degree at The University of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library. Brief quotations from this thesis are allowable without special permission, provided that accurate acknowledgment of source is made. Requests for per­ mission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the head of the major department or the Dean of the Graduate College when in his judgment the proposed use of the material is in the interests of scholarship. In all other instances, however, permission must be obtained from the author. SIGNED: APPROVAL BY THESIS DIRECTOR This thesis has been approved on the date shown below: J/{ <— /9 ^0 JOHN ALEXANDER CARROLL ^ T 5 ite Professor of History PREFACE In the four years following the bloody attack on an Indian encampment by a Tucson posse early in 1871, the veteran professional soldier George Crook had primary responsibility for the reduction and containment of the "hostile" Indians of the Territory of Arizona.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to the Literature of the Southwest Genevieve Porterfield
    New Mexico Quarterly Volume 23 | Issue 2 Article 22 1953 A Guide to the Literature of the Southwest Genevieve Porterfield Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nmq Recommended Citation Porterfield, Genevieve. "A Guide to the Literature of the Southwest." New Mexico Quarterly 23, 2 (1953). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nmq/vol23/iss2/22 This Contents is brought to you for free and open access by the University of New Mexico Press at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in New Mexico Quarterly by an authorized editor of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Porterfield: A Guide to the Literature of the Southwest ( Genevieve Porterfield A GUIDE TO THE LITERATURE OF THE SOUTHWEST, XLV HIS BIB L lOG RAP H y attempts to list, with such thorough­ T ness as time and resources permit, current materials dealing with the Southwest. The Southwest, as here defined, includes all of New Mexico, Arizona and Texas, and parts of Utah, Oklahoma, Colo­ rado and California. In order to conserve space, items from periodicals that are indexed in the Readers' Guide to Periodical Literature, the Education Index, the Industrial Arts Index and the Agricultural Index have been eliminated. Included in this issue are mainly those titles which were published or came to our attention between December I, 1952 and February 28, 1953. BOOKS BEALS, CARLETO!';. Stephen F. Austin, plishments of the first hundred )'ears. father of Texas, illustrated by Jay Hyde Stanford, Stanford University Press, Barnum. New York, McGraw-Hill, 1953, 1952, $6.00.
    [Show full text]
  • Desert Fever: an Overview of Mining History of the California Desert Conservation Area
    Desert Fever: An Overview of Mining History of the California Desert Conservation Area DESERT FEVER: An Overview of Mining in the California Desert Conservation Area Contract No. CA·060·CT7·2776 Prepared For: DESERT PLANNING STAFF BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 3610 Central Avenue, Suite 402 Riverside, California 92506 Prepared By: Gary L. Shumway Larry Vredenburgh Russell Hartill February, 1980 1 Desert Fever: An Overview of Mining History of the California Desert Conservation Area Copyright © 1980 by Russ Hartill Larry Vredenburgh Gary Shumway 2 Desert Fever: An Overview of Mining History of the California Desert Conservation Area Table of Contents PREFACE .................................................................................................................................................. 7 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................... 9 IMPERIAL COUNTY................................................................................................................................. 12 CALIFORNIA'S FIRST SPANISH MINERS............................................................................................ 12 CARGO MUCHACHO MINE ............................................................................................................. 13 TUMCO MINE ................................................................................................................................ 13 PASADENA MINE
    [Show full text]
  • Writing Irataba: on Representing Native Americans on Wikipedia
    AMERICAN ANTHROPOLOGIST Writing Irataba: On Representing Native Americans on Wikipedia Magnus Pharao Hansen ABSTRACT Wikipedia, the online encyclopedia that anyone can edit, is simultaneously an experiment in anarchic knowledge production and a realization of the long dream of modernity: storing all human knowledge. It is also a battleground for the politics of representation and for creating and circulating realities and “Wikialities.” I ethno- graphically describe how Wikipedians, most of whom are white Anglo-Americans, negotiate the representation of Native Americans as objects of encyclopedic knowledge and how the sins of our anthropological forebears come back to haunt us in this process. In 2015, I participated in the collaborative writing of the article on Irataba or Yara tav, who was an important leader of the Mohave people of California and Arizona in the late 19th century. This process brought representational dilemmas to the fore in the negotiation between the inadequacies of historical and anthropological knowledge and Wikipedia’s policies establishing how to authorize and re-represent narratives. These dilemmas point out to us, as 21st-century anthropologists, that we have a responsibility for being the stewards of the knowledge created by anthropologists past as well as for correcting their mistakes and guiding the global public of readers and writers when they make forays into our traditional territories. [Wikipedia, representation of Native Americans, public anthropology, history of anthropology] RESUMEN Wikipedia, la enciclopedia en lınea´ que cualquiera puede editar, es simultaneamente´ un experimento en la produccion´ anarquica´ de conocimiento y una realizacion´ del largo sueno˜ de modernidad: almacenar todo el conocimiento humano. Es tambien´ un campo de batalla para la polıtica´ de representacion´ y para la creacion´ y circulacion´ de realidades y “Wikialidades”.
    [Show full text]
  • California Indian Warfare
    47 CALIFORNIA INDIAN WARFARE Steven R. James Suzanne Graziani 49 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION NORTHERN CALIFORNIA TRIBES CENTRAL COAST TRIBES CENTRAL INTERIOR TRIBES SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TRIBES COLORADO RIVER TRIBES DISCUSSION APPENDIX 1 A List of Warfare Encounters Between Tribes ILLUSTRATION Map Showing Names and Territories of California Tribes BIBLIOGRAPHY 51 INTRODUCTION With the exception of the Mohave and the Yuma Indians along the Colorado River, the tribes of California were considered to be peaceful, yet peaceful is an ambiguous word. While there was no large-scale or organized warfare outside the Colorado River area, all tribes seemed to be, at one time or another, engaged in fighting with their neighbors. There was a great deal of feuding between groups (tribelets or villages) within the individual tribes, also. The basic cause for warfare was economic competition, which included trespassing, and poaching, as well as murder. The Mohave and the Yuma, on the other hand, glorified war for itself. The ambiguity of the word "peaceful" is increased by the accounts in the ethnographies. For example, a tribe may be described as being "peaceful;" yet, warfare with certain neighbors was said to be "common." At times, there were actual contradictions in the information concerning tribal warfare and intertribal relationships. Apparently, each California tribe had contact with most of its neighbors, but for the purposes of this paper, we have divided the state into the following five areas of interaction: the Northern tribes, the Central Coast tribes, the Southern tribes, the Central Interior tribes, and tie Colorado River tribes. Within each area, we have attempted to ascertain which tribes were in agreement and which tribes were in conflict, and if the conflicts were chronic.
    [Show full text]
  • Trail Shrines in Native American Rock Art
    Galal R. Gough TRAIL SHRINES IN NATIVE AMERICAN ROCK ART In 1999, I was given an envelope with six boulder, and from there the trail led toward pictures which had been in the Coachella Valley Rabbit Peak and a box canyon with numerous Historical Society Museum, and which were agave plants, a different trail destination than I unlabeled but had a print date of 1968. Each had expected. picture featured a boulder or boulders with Previously my only experience with trails petroglyphs, and one had two teenage boys having ceremonial features had been what I have inspecting the rock art (Figure 1). The boulders come to call "Safe Passage Trail Shrines." The were along a trail, with a huge body of water in most famous such Trail Shrine is described by the background. If it was the Salton Sea, I Meriweather Lewis in his June 27, 1806 entry in theorized, then the boulders were above the the Lewis and Clark Journals, describing shoreline of Ancient Lake Cahuilla, for they had passage over a high ridge in the Bitter Root no tell-tale tufa or marine deposits on the rock Mountains: surfaces. Ancient Lake Cahuilla had been formed in prehistoric times when in flood stage We halted by the request of the Guides a the Colorado River overflowed and was diverted few minits on an elevated point and smoked to fill the present day Imperial-Coachella a pipe on this eminance the nativs have Valleys. The water line of the huge lake is still raised a conic mound of stons of 6 or 8 feet visible on the mountains because of the tufa or high and erected a pine pole of 15 feet long.
    [Show full text]
  • Proquest Dissertations
    ARIZONA DURING THE CIVIL WAR; THE IMPACT OF THE CALIFORNIA VOLUNTEERS, 1861-1866 Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Masich, Andrew Edward Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 29/09/2021 03:28:53 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/291194 INFORMATION TO USERS This reproduction was made from a copy of a document sent to us for microfilming. While the most advanced technology has been used to photograph and reproduce this document, the quality of the reproduction is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help clarify markings or notations which may appear on this reproduction. 1.The sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting through an image and duplicating adjacent pages to assure complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a round black mark, it is an indication of either blurred copy because of mov.-^ment during exposure, duplicate copy, or copyrighted materials that should not have been filmed. For blurred pages, a good image of the page can be found in the adjacent frame.
    [Show full text]
  • Phonology and Dictionary of Yavapai
    UC Berkeley Dissertations, Department of Linguistics Title Phonology and Dictionary of Yavapai Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9671j4f8 Author Shaterian, Alan Publication Date 1983 eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Phonology and Dictionary of Yavapai By Alan William Shaterian A.B. (Syracuse University) 1963 C.Phil. (University of California) 1973 DISSERTATION Submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in Linguistics in the GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY Approved: Chairmai Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. YAVAPAI PHONOLOGY AND DICTIONARY Copyright @ 1983 by Alan Shaterian Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. DEDICATION For Jeanie Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. YAVAPAI PHONOLOGY AND DICTIONARY by Alan Shaterian ABSTRACT This work will preserve the fundamental facts about the Yavapai language, the most evanescent of the Pai group of Yuman languages, a linguistic family which in its vari­ ety of members and geographic distribution is analagous to the Germanic family as of five centuries ago. The dis­ sertation explores the relationship between the pattern of speech sounds and the shape of words in Yavapai. It de­ scribes the phonology, morphology, and a part of the lex­ icon in a format which is accessible to linguists of varied theoretical backgrounds. It is the speech of Chief Grace Jimulla Mitchell (1903-1976), a speaker of the Prescott subdialect of North­ eastern Yavapai, that forms the basis of the description. The research necessary for this undertaking was spon­ sored in part by the Survey of California and Other Indian Languages at the University of California at Berkeley.
    [Show full text]