The Oswego Canal a Connecting Link Between the United States and Canada, 1819-1837 Janet Larkin

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Oswego Canal a Connecting Link Between the United States and Canada, 1819-1837 Janet Larkin Document generated on 09/26/2021 5:57 a.m. Ontario History The Oswego Canal A Connecting Link Between The United States and Canada, 1819-1837 Janet Larkin Volume 103, Number 1, Spring 2011 Article abstract In this article the author argues that the Oswego Canal (1825-1829) was a vital URI: https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1065479ar commercial link in the Great Lakes-Atlantic seaway, but its real worth became DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/1065479ar evident with the opening of Canada’s neighboring Welland Canal in 1829. The newly fashioned Oswego-Welland line offered an alternative route to the much See table of contents publicized Erie Canal, and brought increased prosperity, settlement, and economic and social opportunities to the Great Lakes region. An important story in its own right, the Oswego Canal, especially in connection with Canada’s Publisher(s) Welland, was one of North America’s more important systems of internal navigation. The Ontario Historical Society ISSN 0030-2953 (print) 2371-4654 (digital) Explore this journal Cite this article Larkin, J. (2011). The Oswego Canal: A Connecting Link Between The United States and Canada, 1819-1837. Ontario History, 103(1), 23–41. https://doi.org/10.7202/1065479ar Copyright © The Ontario Historical Society, 2011 This document is protected by copyright law. Use of the services of Érudit (including reproduction) is subject to its terms and conditions, which can be viewed online. https://apropos.erudit.org/en/users/policy-on-use/ This article is disseminated and preserved by Érudit. Érudit is a non-profit inter-university consortium of the Université de Montréal, Université Laval, and the Université du Québec à Montréal. Its mission is to promote and disseminate research. https://www.erudit.org/en/ The Oswego Canal 2 A Connecting Link Between The United States and Canada, 1819-1837* By Janet Larkin , vol. 1 (1850) , vol. Pictorial Field Book Revolution of the Field Pictorial “The Oswego Canal, whether viewed in reference to the business done on it, or to the facilities it affords for intercom- munication with the Canadas, may very justly be regarded as an important and interesting feature in the internal improvements of this state.” The Western Guidebook and Emigrant’s Directory (1834).1 Oswego harbour in 1848 from Benson J. Lossing, in 1848 from Benson harbour Oswego “ he Oswego Canal,” trumpeted New York market.”2 While Americans the Kingston Chronicle in June were busy celebrating their “Grand Erie of 1830 “which has lately been Canal,” Upper Canadians were actively Tcompleted joins the great Erie Canal at monitoring developments on New York’s the village of Syracuse. The completion Oswego Canal that connected Oswego’s of the Welland Canal which unites the bustling port on Lake Ontario with the waters of Lake Erie and Ontario will ma- Erie Canal at Syracuse. Officially opened terially increase the trade of Oswego—it to traffic in 1829, the Oswego Canal being supposed that a large portion of would become Upper Canada’s gateway the produce coming through that chan- to New York, unlocking a vital commer- nel will enter the Oswego Canal, for the cial waterway between the United States * I am greatful to R.Arthur Bowler for reading earlier drafts of this article and Thomas McIlwraith who provided helpful comments and suggestions in addition to the maps. Craig Williams, history cura- tor of the New York State Museum, drew my attention to the unique illustration of the Oswego Canal. Thanks also to the editor and anonymous readers ofOntario History. 1 The Western Guidebook and Emigrant’s History: Containing General Descriptions of Different Routes Through the State of New York, Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, and Michigan (Buffalo, 1834). 2 From the Kingston Chronicle, reprinted in the Oswego Palladium, 2 June 1830. Ontario History / Volume CIII, No. 1 / Spring 2011 2 ONTARIO HISTORY The newly fashioned Oswego- Welland line brought increased Abstract prosperity, settlement, and so- In this article the author argues that the Oswego Canal cial and economic opportuni- (1825-1829) was a vital commercial link in the Great ties to the Great Lakes region. Lakes-Atlantic seaway, but its real worth became Though frequently regarded as evident with the opening of Canada’s neighboring Welland Canal in 1829. The newly fashioned Oswego- a mere “extension” or branch of Welland line offered an alternative route to the much New York’s grand Erie Canal, publicized Erie Canal, and brought increased prosper- the Oswego Canal, especially ity, settlement, and economic and social opportunities in conjunction with Canada’s to the Great Lakes region. An important story in its own right, the Oswego Canal, especially in connection Welland, was one of North with Canada’s Welland, was one of North America’s America’s more important sys- more important systems of internal navigation. tems of internal navigation. ������������������������North America’s nineteenth Résumé: Le canal Oswego (1825-1829) était déjà un lien commercial essentiel dans la voie maritime century transportation leaders reliant les Grands Lacs à l’Atlantique, mais sa early looked to the Oswego Ca- réelle utilité fut vraiment mise en lumière avec nal as a viable avenue of trade. l’ouverture du canal Welland en 1829. La nouvelle In speaking of the Oswego, route Oswego-Welland non seulement offrait une famed canal engineer, Benjamin alternative au canal Erie, mais elle fut aussi à l’origine d’une nouvelle prospérité, de nouveaux Wright, who provided invalua- établissements comme de nouveaux développements ble service on both the Erie and sociaux et économiques dans la région des Grands Welland canals, remarked, “all Lacs. Important en lui-même, le canal Oswego devint intelligent men at an early date alors, en liaison avec le canal Welland au Canada, l’un des plus importants systèmes de navigation looked that way as the natural intérieure en Amérique du Nord. route for improvement.”3 Amer- ica’s longest serving Secretary of the Treasury, Albert Gallatin, and Canada. Subsequent developments urged his statesmen to consider a conti- like the opening of the Welland Canal nental-wide vision of transportation, see- affirmed the Oswego Canal’s worth in ing in the Oswego Canal, and an addi- the Great Lakes-Atlantic water system. tional canal around Niagara Falls, a more Closely skirting Niagara Falls between comprehensive system of navigation. Re- Lakes Ontario and Erie, the Welland Ca- nowned New York engineer and Surveyor nal, together with the newly opened Os- General, James Geddes, whose work was wego, eliminated more than 150 miles as critical on the Welland Canal as it was of navigation on the Erie Canal’s west- the Erie, examined the Oswego route in ern end, making it an attractive alterna- 1808, reporting favourably on both the tive to inland merchants and shippers. Oswego Canal and the as yet determined 3 In David Hosack, Memoir of De Witt Clinton (New York, 1829), 269. the oswego canal 2 Erie Canal route between Albany and number of salt boats and lumber rafts in- Buffalo. However, the pleas of the New tended for Lake Ontario and the St. Law- York City merchants, who feared the Os- rence market. Clinton was impressed by wego route was too closely linked to Lake the Canada-United States connection, Ontario and the Montreal market, along- noting that in 1809 ninety-ton lake ves- side future Governor De Witt Clinton, sels filled with teas, East India goods, whose sagging political fortunes would coffees and other merchandise regularly S be mended by backing the Erie channel, plied between Oswego and Upper Can- worked in the Erie Canal’s favor.4 Still, ada. Oswego’s residents faithfully sub- the Oswego improvement was never far scribed to the Upper Canadian Guardian from the minds of canal proponents. for commercial news and opportunities Having secured his pet project, even De in the neighbouring country.7 Ironically, Witt Clinton, now dubbed the “father of the rampant smuggling that occurred D the Erie Canal,” went on to promote the in this region during the embargo and Oswego improvement. More than once War of 1812 awakened borderland mer- did Clinton acknowledge the Oswego chants to the thriving inland trade. Con- Canal as “an important link in the chain sequently, when New Yorkers went to of communications.”5 build the Oswego Canal, the Canadian Upper Canadians closely followed market was regarded as essential to the the internal improvements drive in canal’s success. These connections would neighbouring New York. Indeed, some be strengthened with the opening of the of the keenest supporters of the Oswe- Welland Canal that sent trade to Oswe- go Canal were Canada’s merchants and go, Kingston and Montreal. entrepreneurs who benefited from the Though countless politicians, engi- American system. Long before the Erie neers, legislatures, and private individuals Canal’s celebrated opening in 1825, Os- had encouraged the building of the Os- wego’s commercial importance as a lake wego Canal for years past, it was not until port had been established with contacts the second decade of the nineteenth cen- principally at Kingston, on Lake On- tury that improvements to the Oswego tario, and Montreal on the St. Lawrence.6 River began. An important development While investigating the Oswego route in in the canal’s history came in 1819 with 1810, De Witt Clinton saw firsthand the the completion of the mile-long Salina 4 Evan Cognac, The Birth of Empire: DeWitt Clinton and the American Experience, 1769-1828 (Ox- ford: Oxford University Press, 1998), 104. 5 Onondaga Register, 2 November 1825. An earlier speech by Clinton to the Albany legislature gives further praise to the Oswego improvement and can be read in the American newspaper Niles Weekly Regis- ter, 29 January, 1820; 17, 438.
Recommended publications
  • Erie Canalway Map & Guide
    National Park Service Erie Canalway National Heritage Corridor U.S. Department of the Interior Erie Canalway Map & Guide Pittsford, Frank Forte Pittsford, The New York State Canal System—which includes the Erie, Champlain, Cayuga-Seneca, and Oswego Canals—is the centerpiece of the Erie Canalway National Heritage Corridor. Experience the enduring legacy of this National Historic Landmark by boat, bike, car, or on foot. Discover New York’s Dubbed the “Mother of Cities” the canal fueled the growth of industries, opened the nation to settlement, and made New York the Empire State. (Clinton Square, Syracuse, 1905, courtesy Library of Congress, Prints & Photographs Division, Detroit Publishing Extraordinary Canals Company Collection.) pened in 1825, New York’s canals are a waterway link from the Atlantic Ocean to the Great Lakes through the heart of upstate New York. Through wars and peacetime, prosperity and This guide presents exciting Orecession, flood and drought, this exceptional waterway has provided a living connection things to do, places to go, to a proud past and a vibrant future. Built with leadership, ingenuity, determination, and hard work, and exceptional activities to the canals continue to remind us of the qualities that make our state and nation great. They offer us enjoy. Welcome! inspiration to weather storms and time-tested knowledge that we will prevail. Come to New York’s canals this year. Touch the building stones CONTENTS laid by immigrants and farmers 200 years ago. See century-old locks, lift Canals and COVID-19 bridges, and movable dams constructed during the canal’s 20th century Enjoy Boats and Boating Please refer to current guidelines and enlargement and still in use today.
    [Show full text]
  • New York State Canal Corporation Flood Warning and Optimization System
    K19-10283720JGM New York State Canal Corporation Flood Warning and Optimization System SCOPE OF SERVICES K19-10283720JGM Contents 1 Background of the Project........................................................................................................... 3 2 Existing FWOS features ............................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Data Import Interfaces ............................................................................................................ 5 2.2 Numeric Models ...................................................................................................................... 5 2.2.1 Hydrologic Model............................................................................................................. 6 2.2.2 Hydraulic Model .............................................................................................................. 6 2.3 Data Dissemination Interfaces .................................................................................................. 6 3 Technical Landscape ................................................................................................................... 7 3.1 Software ................................................................................................................................. 7 3.1.1 Systems......................................................................................................................... 7 3.1.2 FWOS Software ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Barge Canal” Is No Longer an Accurate Description of the New York State Canals Marine Activity on New York’S Canals
    The Story of the Afterword Today, the name “Barge Canal” is no longer an accurate description of the New York State Canals marine activity on New York’s canals. Trains and trucks have taken over the transport of most cargo that once moved on barges along the canals, but the canals remain a viable waterway for navigation. Now, pleasure boats, tour Historical and Commercial Information boats, cruise ships, canoes and kayaks comprise the majority of vessels that ply the waters of the legendary Erie and the Champlain, Oswego and Cayuga- Seneca canals, which now constitute the 524-mile New York State Canal ROY G. FINCH System. State Engineer and Surveyor While the barges now are few, this network of inland waterways is a popular tourism destination each year for thousands of pleasure boaters as well as visitors by land, who follow the historic trade route that made New York the “Empire State.” Across the canal corridor, dozens of historic sites, museums and community festivals in charming port towns and bustling cities invite visitors to step back in time and re-live the early canal days when “hoggees” guided mule-drawn packet boats along the narrow towpaths. Today, many of the towpaths have been transformed into Canalway Trail segments, extending over 220 miles for the enjoyment of outdoor enthusiasts from near and far who walk, bike and hike through scenic and historic canal areas. In 1992, legislation was enacted in New York State which changed the name of the Barge Canal to the “New York State Canal System” and transferred responsibility for operation and maintenance of the Canal System from the New York State Department of Transportation to the New York State Canal Corporation, a newly created subsidiary of the New York State Thruway Authority.
    [Show full text]
  • Oswego County 2012 Water Chestnut Control Program
    Oswego County Soil and Water Conservation District 3105 State Route 3 Fulton, New York 13069 Oswego County 2012 Water Chestnut Control Program Introduction This year’s Water chestnut (Trapa natans) control program included various physical hand pulling events as well as a large chemical treatment approach throughout Oswego County. Multiple hand pulls were orchestrated on three different water bodies: Oswego River, Oneida Lake and the Salmon River. Chemical treatment took place on the Oswego River only. Chemical Treatment Preparations and planning began during the winter and spring of 2012. Discussions took place between NYS Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC)/Division of Environmental Permits, Onondaga County Health Department and this office pertaining to the application techniques and outcomes. Decisions were being formulated as to which approach would be undertaken for the 2012 season: chemical alone, and which one? hand pulling, cutting, and/or mechanical harvesting, or a combination of any or all of the mentioned techniques. Chemical effectiveness was being looked at more closely; knowing that terrestrial plants can build up a resistance to glyphosate (Roundup), and that Rodeo (the aquatic version of Roundup) has been used for a number of years now, it was decided to alter the chemical for 2012. The prior approved and labeled chemical called Clearcast was then selected to be used as a comparison test for effectiveness. Clearcast cost ten times as much as Rodeo, thereby making for a tighter management of financial resources in support of the 2012 expectation. A total resources package was then developed between: St. Lawrence-Eastern Lake Ontario (SLELO) PRISM via The Nature Conservancy, the NYS Environmental Protection Fund via the Finger Lakes-Lake Ontario Watershed Protection Alliance (FLLOWPA) and the federal Great Lakes Restoration Initiative (GLRI) Aquatic Nuisance Species grant via FLLOWPA.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Water Chestnut Control Report
    OSWEGO RIVER BASIN AQUATIC INVASIVE CONTROL Oswego County Soil and Water Conservation District Water Chestnut Control Final Report September 22, 2016 1. Due to the fact that New York State/Department of Environmental Conservation permitting protocols changed beginning in the 2016 season and was late being noticed at the local level, such requirements were then shifted over to the awarded contractor for completion. General chemical permit application work and public notification was completed by contractor and spraying was conducted on Monday, August 29th, 2016. Approximately 60 acres of Water chestnut was treated in Ox Creek between the RR Bridge overpass and Co. Rt. 14 highway culvert. Another 20 acres were treated just on the north side of Big Island located downstream from Ox Creek, in the Oswego River. Water samples were pulled and analyzed for any chemical concentrations; by September 2nd concentration levels were below 1ppb, and the lifting of the restriction of water usage notice was sent out to all targeted property owners within the treatment areas. On September 14th a visual observation was conducted and clearly showed that the treated areas were decaying and decomposing as expected. As the season progressed, other areas within the Oswego River Corridor showed increase numbers of plants, more than what could be hand pulled. Therefore, for 2017 a more intense chemical treatment campaign will be necessary to keep Water chestnut in check. 2. Five college students formed the first Oswego County Water Chestnut Assault Team (aka Water CATs). Team began work on June 7th and continued throughout the summer, for a ten week period, ending on August 11th.
    [Show full text]
  • Vision 2030 Comprehensive Plan
    New York State's only Port on Lake Ontario VISION 2030 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN March 2021 Table of Contents Section Page Vision ..........................................................................................................................................................................................1 Background ............................................................................................................................................................................1 Historic Preservation and Educational Assets ...................................................................................................5 Existing Improvements and Conditions .........................................................................................................5 The Plan to Advance the Vision for Historic and Educational Assets ............................................5 Commercial Development and Economic Development Programs .................................................5 Existing Improvements and Conditions .........................................................................................................5 Plans to Advance the Vision with Port Projects ..........................................................................................8 Current Port Commodities ......................................................................................................................................10 Plans to Advance the Vision with Industrial Projects ..............................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • Greater Syracuse Area Waterway Destinations and Services
    Waterway Destinations and Services Map Central Square Y¹ `G Area Syracuse Greater 37 C Brewerton International a e m t ic Speedway Bradbury's R ou d R Boatel !/ y Remains of 5 Waterfront nt Bradbury Rd 1841 Lock !!¡ !l Fort Brewerton State Dock ou Caughdenoy Marina C !Z!x !5 Alb County Route 37 a Virginia St ert Palmer Ln bc !x !x !Z Weber Rd !´ zabeth St N River Dr !´ E R North St Eli !£ iver R C a !´ A bc d !º UG !x W Genesee St H Big Bay B D !£ E L ÆJ !´ \ N A ! 5 O C !l Marina !´ ! Y !5 K )§ !x !x !´ ÆJ Mercer x! Candy's Brewerton x! N B a Memorial 5 viga Ç7 Winter Harbor r Y b Landing le hC Boat Yard e ! Cha Park FA w nn e St NCH Charley's Boat Livery ![ el Charlott ROAD ER Guy Young Rd e r Oswego St Hidden Harbor !® t !´ Lock 23 o Trade-A-Yacht !´ 159 Oneid n Marina XW Ess-Kay Yards R !y Lock State Canal XW Ka East Marina a d 158 th C N R Park a a River St Island L !x zG n v E !l NA !x i E A ga C Brewerton R b K Y d Park D 151 l N ¡ e LOCK 23 Brewerton A C E O River § h O XWXW !l Riverfront Park 5 !l a ERI H R ! n T !¡ n Û 150 [¤ N el Paper Mill !´ !´ 136 5 J !£ A Æ GUY !y !´ ! D K XWXW Island Park 5 H OA A `G R T 137 !´ ! OR YO H 134 5 !2 !¡ A E U S R Bl NG N ! !® O XW O C O H a W E G ROAD O A c R O S DINGLEHOLE D LINE E 169 k D XW ¸- COUNTY !y !\ 170 135 Bartel Rd ÆJ !® XWXW 31 J D SH Æ PE COUNTY LINE Marble St NDE COLE RD R !º Mud RGAST UBA I ROAD EAST !¡ Û!´ S D ROAD Phoenix L SeeROA Brewerton CanalR Port Inset !2 LOCK O-1 A MILLE BA 00.250.125 LANE N KIBBY D Û RABBIT FENNER R RD ROAD !£ ORANGEPORT B Miles N River Edge Mansion
    [Show full text]
  • Habitat Use and Movement of Re
    Updated Fall 2018 By Thomas E. Brooking, Cornell University Biological Field Station Richard Colesante, Oneida Lake Association Lake Sturgeon were once very abundant in the Great Lakes region and its tributaries. Historical accounts indicate commercial fishermen used to stack them like cordwood up on the bank, because they tore up their fishing nets. Atlantic sturgeon in the Hudson River near Albany were referred to as “Albany beef”, being loaded onto ice in railroad cars and shipped to New York City. The eggs of the sturgeon became prized as caviar, and the smoked flesh considered a delicacy. It was this popularity that soon led to their demise. These magnificent fish whose ancestors have been around for more than 200 million years were reduced to remnant populations by humans in a matter of 70 years. Why did they disappear? People overharvested sturgeon for caviar and for meat. Sturgeon are long-lived creatures, sometimes living up to 150 years old. Being long-lived, female sturgeon do not begin to spawn until they are about 17 years old, and were often harvested before they could even spawn once. People would catch a 5 foot long sturgeon and think it’s a huge fish, but that fish has not even spawned once yet. During the Industrial Revolution, construction of dams on rivers was a major contributing factor to spawning failures, and many of those dams remain in place today. Not only did dams block their spawning streams, but fish stacking up behind the dams became easy targets for overfishing. Pollution and water quality problems likely affected sturgeon in some waters, and illegal poaching for the lucrative caviar trade may have contributed as well.
    [Show full text]
  • National Significance and Historical Context
    2.1 2 National Signifi cance and Historical Context NATIONAL SIGNIFICANCE OVERVIEW Th e Erie Canal is the most successful and infl uential human-built waterway and one of the most important works of civil engineering and construction in North America. It facilitated and shaped the course of settlement of the North- east, Midwest, and Great Plains, knit together the Atlantic Seaboard with the area west of the Appalachian Mountains, solidifi ed New York City’s place as the young nation’s principal seaport and commercial center, and became a central element forging the national identity. New York’s canal system, including the Erie Canal and its laterals – principally the Champlain, Oswego, and Cayuga-Seneca Canals – opened the interior of the continent. Built through the only low-level gap between the Appalachian Mountain chain and the Adirondack Mountains, the Erie Canal provided one of the principal routes for migration and an economical and reliable means for transporting agricultural products and manufactured goods between the American interior, the eastern seaboard, and Europe. Th e Erie Canal was a heroic feat of early 19th century engineering and construc- tion, and at 363 miles long, more than twice the length of any canal in Europe. Photo: It was without precedent in North America, designed and built through sparsely Postcard image of canal basin in Clinton Square, Syracuse, ca. 1905 settled territory by surveyors, engineers, contractors, and laborers who had to learn much of their craft on the job. Engineers and builders who got their start on New York’s canals went on to construct other canals, railroads, and public water supplies throughout the new nation.
    [Show full text]
  • NYSCS Recreational Pass Information
    Table of Contents www.canals.ny.gov WELCOME TO THE NEW YORK STATE CANAL SYSTEM _________________________________________ 1 New York State Canal System OPERATIONAL SCHEDULE________________________ 2 ERIE CHAMPLAIN OSWEGO CAYUGA-SENECA RECREATIONAL PASS FEE SCHEDULE ____________ 2 SEASONAL PASSES _______________________________ 3 PURCHASE OF A SEASONAL PASS __________________ 3 RECREATIONAL PASS Eligibility______________________________________________ 3 Purchase_______________________________________________ 3 Payment _______________________________________________ 4 Refund ________________________________________________ 4 INFORMATION USE OF A SEASONAL PASS _________________________ 5 Conditions _____________________________________________ 5 Valid Time Period _______________________________________ 5 REPLACEMENT OF PASS DECALS __________________ 5 Eligibility for Replacement ________________________________ 5 Instructions for Replacement_______________________________ 6 TRANSFER OF A SEASONAL PASS___________________ 7 Eligibility for Transfer____________________________________ 7 Instructions for Transfer __________________________________ 7 TEN-DAY AND TWO-DAY PASSES __________________ 8 PURCHASE OF TEN-DAY AND TWO-DAY PASSES ____ 8 Eligibility______________________________________________ 8 Purchase_______________________________________________ 8 Payment _______________________________________________ 9 Refund/Transfer/Replacement_____________________________ 10 USE OF TEN-DAY AND TWO-DAY PASSES __________ 10 Conditions ____________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Water Everywhere
    Water, Water, Everywhere Lesson for the Atlas of New York: Legacies of the Erie Canal Because of our fairly wet climate and the landscape left us from the Ice Age, New York has many rivers and streams. They are connected together to form watersheds. (see page 9). 1. Find three watersheds on this map. Name them after the main river. List them here: Black River, _______________________________________________________ ________________________________, _________________________________ 2. Rivers always flow from high to low elevation. There is an elevation map on page 4. What do the colors on this map tell you? Green is ________ elevation; orange is _______________ elevation; brown is _________ elevation. 3. The map above is the same as the one on Atlas New York page 8. Find the Genesee River. Draw a triangle ( ) at the source of this river. It begins in northern Pennsylvania, and it flows ___________ (direction) into ______________________ (a big body of water). How do we know that? Flip back to page 4. The elevation of northern Pennsylvania is ________, and the elevation of that body of water is ___________. 4. Now see if you can determine the direction of flow for the Hudson River. Find its source and mark that with a . It begins in what part of New York (NW, NE, SW, or SE)? ________ It ends at the _______________ Ocean at the City of ___________________. Therefore, it must flow in a __________ direction. 5. TESTING YOUR GEOGRAPHIC KNOWLEDGE! The Niagara River connects two Great Lakes, Ontario and Erie. Which way does it flow? Does it flow south from Lake Ontario to Lake Erie, or does it flow north from Lake Erie to Lake Ontario? __________________________ Use the elevation map on page 4 to help you explain your answer.
    [Show full text]
  • The 1996 Priority Waterbodies List for the Oswego-Seneca-Oneida River Basin
    Note: The following is an abridged version of the 1996 PWL list and shows only those counties that pertain to the Oneida Lake watershed (Lewis, Madison, Oneida, Onondaga, and Oswego). Division of Water The 1996 Priority Waterbodies List for The Oswego-Seneca-Oneida River Basin including portions of the Central and Eastern Lake Ontario Watersheds Encompassing all or portions of Cayuga, Chemung, Cortland, Jefferson, Lewis, Madison, Monroe, Oneida, Onondaga, Ontario, Oswego, Seneca, Schuyler, Steuben, Tompkins, Wayne and Yates Counties September 1996 Appendix I Page 1 The 1996 Priority Waterbodies List (PWL) for The Oswego-Seneca-Oneida River Basin including portions of the Central and Eastern Lake Ontario Watersheds Periodically, the NYSDEC Division of Water publishes a list of surface waters that either cannot be fully used as a resource, or have problems that can damage their environmental integrity. This list--The Priority Waterbodies List (formerly referred to as the Priority Water Problems List, or PWP List)--is used as a base resource for Division of Water program management. This listing of the Priority Waterbodies List (PWL) includes individual waterbody data sheets describing the conditions, causes, and sources of water quality problems in the Oswego-Seneca-Oneida Rivers Drainage Basin and portions of the Central and Eastern Lake Ontario Watersheds. Specifically, this document lists those PWL waters of or tributary to the Oswego River, or that enter Lake Ontario between the Oswego-Jefferson County line and the Wayne-Monroe County line (tributaries Ont 47 thru Ont 98, including P1041). This basin also includes waters of and tributary to the NYS Barge Canal between the Wayne-Monroe County line and the canal confluence with the Mohawk River in Rome.
    [Show full text]