DOCSLIB.ORG

Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) Friday Volume 542 23 March 2012 No. 285 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Friday 23 March 2012 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2012 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Parliamentary Click-Use Licence, available online through The National Archives website at www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/information-management/our-services/parliamentary-licence-information.htm Enquiries to The National Archives, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 4DU; e-mail: [email protected] 1045 23 MARCH 2012 Budget Resolutions and Economic 1046 Situation This Government ultimately have a laser focus on House of Commons making Britain the best place in the world to start, finance and grow a business. Friday 23 March 2012 Mr Stewart Jackson (Peterborough) (Con): On the subject of Labour waste and profligacy, is my right hon. Friend aware that the Institute for Fiscal Studies says The House met at half-past Nine o’clock that had Labour been re-elected, it would have borrowed an extra £200 billion, which would have had a huge PRAYERS impact on interest rates, in particular, and, given the debt legacy in households, a calamitous impact on the [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] economy generally? Ways and Means Justine Greening: My hon. Friend is absolutely right. Labour Members have learned nothing from the mess Budget Resolutions and Economic they handed over to us. They see us in a debt crisis and Situation their solution is to keep on borrowing—keep on digging— and we all know who would pick up that bill. AMENDMENT OF THE LAW Mr Russell Brown (Dumfries and Galloway) (Lab) Debate resumed (Order, 22 March). rose— Question again proposed, (1) That it is expedient to amend the law with respect to the Owen Smith (Pontypridd) (Lab) rose— National Debt and the public revenue and to make further provision in connection with Justine Greening: I will not give way; I am still replying finance. to an intervention. The worst thing that Britain could (2) This Resolution does not extend to the making of any do right now is to listen to the siren voices of the amendment with respect Opposition. They are very good at criticising, but they to value added tax so as to provide— have absolutely no credible alternative, and that is probably (a) for zero-rating or exempting a supply, acquisition or importation, the key message that will come across to the public who (b) for refunding an amount of tax, are watching this debate. (c) for any relief, other than a relief that— From easing access to credit and bringing down the (i) so far as it is applicable to goods, applies to goods of every cost of borrowing for small businesses, to cutting description, and corporation tax and reforming the planning system, the (ii) so far as it is applicable to services, applies to services of measures set out in this Budget will help to get growth every description. back into our economy. They will also help to rebalance 9.34 am the economy by supporting our companies—wealth creators shifting UK plc from a spend-and-borrow path The Secretary of State for Transport (Justine Greening): under the previous Government to a make-and-sell It is a great pleasure to be able to resume the debate on future under this one. the Budget today. This is the coalition Government’s third Budget. It is a Budget that helps Britain to earn its Owen Smith: Will the Minister confirm that the Office way in the world, rewards working families, backs business, for Budget Responsibility tells us that next year the and sticks to our course of clearing up the economic volume of investment by British companies in the UK mess that the previous Government left us. This Budget, will go down by 0.7%—that is, 7% down on the previous like the last two, cannot be divorced from the urgent year’s estimate? Is that right? need to deal with Labour’s debts. Let us remember the crisis that we inherited less than two years ago. The Justine Greening: If the hon. Gentleman reads the state was borrowing one in four of every pound it spent whole OBR report, he will realise that Britain is an and spending £120 million a day on debt interest alone. economy that operates in a global marketplace. Of The country was taken to the brink of bankruptcy by a course, his solution to the challenges faced in that profligate Labour Government, leaving our people with global marketplace is to go and join all the countries the biggest deficit in the developed world. that are facing problems, not to tackle our own economic This Budget marks another step on the road to a crisis that his party left us. I assume that most, if not all strong and stable economy, and that is why we are the interventions that I get from Labour Members will sticking to our deficit reduction plan, winning credibility be cherry-picked statistics that offer no alternative solutions in the markets and keeping interest rates low. to the challenges facing Britain. Mike Gapes (Ilford South) (Lab/Co-op): Will the right hon. Lady explain why this Government are going Mr Russell Brown rose— to add £150 billion to total borrowing? Is that a sign of success? Justine Greening: I wonder whether the hon. Gentleman has an alternative. Justine Greening: Many people who see that the hon. Gentleman’s party’s strategy is to borrow in the middle Mr Brown: I am not about to cherry-pick a statistic, of a debt crisis will wonder why he is asking that but let me give the Secretary of State some facts. I appreciate question. I presume it is because he thinks that borrowing that she was not here at the time, but when the Labour is not high enough. Government came into power in 1997, the servicing of 1047 Budget Resolutions and Economic 23 MARCH 2012 Budget Resolutions and Economic 1048 Situation Situation [Mr Russell Brown] Tom Blenkinsop (Middlesbrough South and East Cleveland) (Lab): I find the Secretary of State’s emphasis the debt that was left behind amounted to more than on infrastructure appealing, because infrastructure is was being spent on transport and defence combined. needed. Unfortunately, the Office for Budget Responsibility That was a major task to be handled by the incoming has put the majority of growth for the foreseeable Labour Government, so everything was not rosy in the future down to personal consumption. Last Budget, it garden. said that 12.5% of growth would come from private consumption. It now says that the figure is 37.5%. That Justine Greening: The previous Conservative Government is the very growth that the Government have now handed over a golden economic legacy. It was the condemned. Labour party that handed over a Britain loaded up with Justine Greening: I am not sure that the hon. Gentleman’s debt, costing us £120 million a day in debt interest, and intervention made much sense. I agree that infrastructure that left unemployment higher than when it came to is critical. The key part of the OBR report, which he office, like every single Labour Government we have ought to focus on, states that we are on course to meet ever had. I will take no lectures from the party opposite our fiscal mandate and to get our public finances back on economic management, and neither will the British in order. I am sure that he welcomes the OBR’s assessment people. that we will see the net creation of 1 million jobs in this country over the coming year. Matthew Hancock (West Suffolk) (Con): On the question of investment from overseas, is my right hon. Friend Helen Goodman (Bishop Auckland) (Lab): To explain aware that some Labour shadow Cabinet Ministers further the point made by my hon. Friend the Member have said that they would reverse the corporation tax for Middlesbrough South and East Cleveland (Tom cut, which was cited by GlaxoSmithKline yesterday Blenkinsop), if the Secretary of State turns to table D.1 when it announced 1,000 new jobs in this country? in the Red Book, which shows the detailed summary of the OBR’s central forecast, and looks along the line for “Fixed investment” by “General government”, she will Justine Greening: Ultimately, Labour Members seem see that it falls in 2011, falls in 2012 and falls in 2013. to know nothing about how business runs. It may be That is the point that my hon. Friend was making. The that none of them has ever worked in business. Keeping right hon. Lady clearly has not looked at the Red Book. our corporation tax rate low is critical in re-establishing our economic credibility and our tax competitiveness. Justine Greening: This Government are investing more Those are fundamental building blocks in getting the money in capital spend than was planned by the previous investment that we are seeing. I wholeheartedly welcome Government. If the hon. Lady is complaining about the steps that the Chancellor has taken. those numbers, she would be complaining even more if As my right hon. Friend the Prime Minister has said, we had the misfortune of having her party in office. the infrastructure deficit that we inherited is just as This Government are investing in infrastructure and serious as the budget deficit for our future productivity putting unprecedented levels of investment into the and the country’s ability to be successful. Infrastructure railways, as I am sure she is well aware, even though she matters because it makes possible our journeys to work, prefers to score a political point.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Conservative Party's Credibility Deficit Updated Tax and Spending
    The Conservative Party’s credibility deficit Updated tax and spending commitments April 2010 2 Contents Page Introduction 5 Summary 7 Methodology 8 Tables 10 Broken promises 13 45,000 new single rooms in the NHS 15 5,000 new prison places 19 Reducing taxes on savings 22 More places for science courses, training and apprenticeships 24 Maternity nurses for all 25 Reinstate the Defence Export Services Organisation (DESO) 28 National Loan Guarantee Scheme 30 Tax cuts 33 Corporation tax and investment allowance changes 35 Freeze council tax for two years 38 Reduce employers’ NICs for some small companies 41 Tax cuts for married couples 43 Inheritance tax cuts 50 Reverse impact of abolition of dividend tax credit 53 Tax reversals 57 Raise National Insurance Contributions thresholds 59 Oppose Broadband levy 61 Oppose cider duty increase 63 Tax increases 65 Non-domicile levy 67 Spending reductions 73 Cut Government “waste” 75 Savings on employment and skills programmes 78 Reduce spending on Building Schools for the Future 83 Reduce eligibility for tax credits 85 Reduce eligibility for Child Trust Funds 88 Reduce government spending on consultants and advertising 90 Reduce “bureaucracy” spending by a third 92 Welfare savings 95 Scrap ContactPoint 98 NHS IT Programme 100 Freeze pay and cap pensions for public sector workers 103 Reduce spending on Sure Start outreach workers 105 3 Scrap some Regional Development Agencies 107 Scrap regional assemblies 109 Scrap identity cards 110 “Cutting the cost of politics” 112 Scrap the Trade Union Modernisation
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)
    Wednesday Volume 527 11 May 2011 No. 155 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Wednesday 11 May 2011 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2011 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Parliamentary Click-Use Licence, available online through The National Archives website at www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/information-management/our-services/parliamentary-licence-information.htm Enquiries to The National Archives, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 4DU; e-mail: [email protected] 1145 11 MAY 2011 1146 12. Andrew Selous (South West Bedfordshire) (Con): House of Commons What progress has been made on the Government’s commitment to undertake a process similar to the Wednesday 11 May 2011 Calman commission on devolution funding; and if she will make a statement. [54363] The House met at half-past Eleven o’clock The Secretary of State for Wales (Mrs Cheryl Gillan): Following the yes vote in the referendum on further PRAYERS powers, we have started to consider the scope and form of such a process. Now that the elections to the National [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] Assembly have taken place I intend to discuss the process with other stakeholders and the First Minister. May I also take this opportunity while I am at the Dispatch Box to offer our congratulations to Carwyn Oral Answers to Questions Jones, who is currently considering forming the Welsh Assembly Government and has the largest party in the Welsh Assembly? WALES Mary Macleod: Our priority in Wales and elsewhere The Secretary of State was asked— right now is to ensure that the deficit is under control.
    [Show full text]
  • 'The Left's Views on Israel: from the Establishment of the Jewish State To
    ‘The Left’s Views on Israel: From the establishment of the Jewish state to the intifada’ Thesis submitted by June Edmunds for PhD examination at the London School of Economics and Political Science 1 UMI Number: U615796 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U615796 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 F 7377 POLITI 58^S8i ABSTRACT The British left has confronted a dilemma in forming its attitude towards Israel in the postwar period. The establishment of the Jewish state seemed to force people on the left to choose between competing nationalisms - Israeli, Arab and later, Palestinian. Over time, a number of key developments sharpened the dilemma. My central focus is the evolution of thinking about Israel and the Middle East in the British Labour Party. I examine four critical periods: the creation of Israel in 1948; the Suez war in 1956; the Arab-Israeli war of 1967 and the 1980s, covering mainly the Israeli invasion of Lebanon but also the intifada. In each case, entrenched attitudes were called into question and longer-term shifts were triggered in the aftermath.
    [Show full text]
  • Z675928x Margaret Hodge Mp 06/10/2011 Z9080283 Lorely
    Z675928X MARGARET HODGE MP 06/10/2011 Z9080283 LORELY BURT MP 08/10/2011 Z5702798 PAUL FARRELLY MP 09/10/2011 Z5651644 NORMAN LAMB 09/10/2011 Z236177X ROBERT HALFON MP 11/10/2011 Z2326282 MARCUS JONES MP 11/10/2011 Z2409343 CHARLOTTE LESLIE 12/10/2011 Z2415104 CATHERINE MCKINNELL 14/10/2011 Z2416602 STEPHEN MOSLEY 18/10/2011 Z5957328 JOAN RUDDOCK MP 18/10/2011 Z2375838 ROBIN WALKER MP 19/10/2011 Z1907445 ANNE MCINTOSH MP 20/10/2011 Z2408027 IAN LAVERY MP 21/10/2011 Z1951398 ROGER WILLIAMS 21/10/2011 Z7209413 ALISTAIR CARMICHAEL 24/10/2011 Z2423448 NIGEL MILLS MP 24/10/2011 Z2423360 BEN GUMMER MP 25/10/2011 Z2423633 MIKE WEATHERLEY MP 25/10/2011 Z5092044 GERAINT DAVIES MP 26/10/2011 Z2425526 KARL TURNER MP 27/10/2011 Z242877X DAVID MORRIS MP 28/10/2011 Z2414680 JAMES MORRIS MP 28/10/2011 Z2428399 PHILLIP LEE MP 31/10/2011 Z2429528 IAN MEARNS MP 31/10/2011 Z2329673 DR EILIDH WHITEFORD MP 31/10/2011 Z9252691 MADELEINE MOON MP 01/11/2011 Z2431014 GAVIN WILLIAMSON MP 01/11/2011 Z2414601 DAVID MOWAT MP 02/11/2011 Z2384782 CHRISTOPHER LESLIE MP 04/11/2011 Z7322798 ANDREW SLAUGHTER 05/11/2011 Z9265248 IAN AUSTIN MP 08/11/2011 Z2424608 AMBER RUDD MP 09/11/2011 Z241465X SIMON KIRBY MP 10/11/2011 Z2422243 PAUL MAYNARD MP 10/11/2011 Z2261940 TESSA MUNT MP 10/11/2011 Z5928278 VERNON RODNEY COAKER MP 11/11/2011 Z5402015 STEPHEN TIMMS MP 11/11/2011 Z1889879 BRIAN BINLEY MP 12/11/2011 Z5564713 ANDY BURNHAM MP 12/11/2011 Z4665783 EDWARD GARNIER QC MP 12/11/2011 Z907501X DANIEL KAWCZYNSKI MP 12/11/2011 Z728149X JOHN ROBERTSON MP 12/11/2011 Z5611939 CHRIS
    [Show full text]
  • Groups, Governance and the Development of UK Al- Cohol Policy: an Adversarial Policy Communities Ap- Proach
    ORBIT-OnlineRepository ofBirkbeckInstitutionalTheses Enabling Open Access to Birkbeck’s Research Degree output Groups, governance and the development of UK al- cohol policy: an adversarial policy communities ap- proach https://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/id/eprint/40473/ Version: Full Version Citation: Barrett, Gareth Paul (2020) Groups, governance and the de- velopment of UK alcohol policy: an adversarial policy communities ap- proach. [Thesis] (Unpublished) c 2020 The Author(s) All material available through ORBIT is protected by intellectual property law, including copy- right law. Any use made of the contents should comply with the relevant law. Deposit Guide Contact: email Groups, governance and the development of UK alcohol policy: An Adversarial Policy Communities Approach Gareth Paul Barrett A thesis presented for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Politics Birkbeck, University of London January 2020 1 Declaration of Work I certify that the thesis I have presented for examination for the PhD degree of the University of London is solely my own work other than where I have clearly indicated that it is the work of others. The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. Quotation from it is permitted, provided that full acknowledgement is made. This thesis may not be reproduced without my prior written consent. 2 Abstract The governance of UK alcohol policy looks like a textbook case of decision-making by a closed community of policymakers and industry insiders, but this thesis challenges this view. Drawing on Jordan and Richardson’s policy communities approach and Dudley and Richardson’s later work on adversarial policy communities, it examines the complex development of UK alcohol policy using archival sources, government and pressure group reports, news releases and historic media coverage going back over a century.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)
    Monday Volume 557 21 January 2013 No. 100 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Monday 21 January 2013 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2013 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. HER MAJESTY’S GOVERNMENT MEMBERS OF THE CABINET (FORMED BY THE RT HON.DAVID CAMERON,MP,MAY 2010) PRIME MINISTER,FIRST LORD OF THE TREASURY AND MINISTER FOR THE CIVIL SERVICE—The Rt Hon. David Cameron, MP DEPUTY PRIME MINISTER AND LORD PRESIDENT OF THE COUNCIL—The Rt Hon. Nick Clegg, MP FIRST SECRETARY OF STATE AND SECRETARY OF STATE FOR FOREIGN AND COMMONWEALTH AFFAIRS—The Rt Hon. William Hague, MP CHANCELLOR OF THE EXCHEQUER—The Rt Hon. George Osborne, MP CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE TREASURY—The Rt Hon. Danny Alexander, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT—The Rt Hon. Theresa May, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR DEFENCE—The Rt Hon. Philip Hammond, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR BUSINESS,INNOVATION AND SKILLS—The Rt Hon. Vince Cable, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR WORK AND PENSIONS—The Rt Hon. Iain Duncan Smith, MP LORD CHANCELLOR AND SECRETARY OF STATE FOR JUSTICE—The Rt Hon. Chris Grayling, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR EDUCATION—The Rt Hon. Michael Gove, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR COMMUNITIES AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT—The Rt Hon. Eric Pickles, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR HEALTH—The Rt Hon. Jeremy Hunt, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT,FOOD AND RURAL AFFAIRS—The Rt Hon. Owen Paterson, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT—The Rt Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • Why the Global Economy Needs Nations
    WHY THE GLOBAL ECONOMY NEEDS NATIONS By the Rt Hon Francis Maude MP Shadow Chancellor of the Exchequer Adam Smith Institute 1999 First published in the UK in 1999 by ASI (Research) Limited ã The Adam Smith Institute All rights reserved. Apart from fair dealing for the purposes of private study, research, criticism, or review, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission of the publishers, ASI (Research) Limited, 23 Great Smith Street, London SW1P 3BL (0171 222 4995) The views expressed in this publication are those of the author and do necessarily reflect those of the publisher or copyright owner. They have been selected for their independence and intellectual vigour, and are presented as a contribution to public debate. ISBN: 1-902737 14 8 About the author Francis Maude, the MP for Horsham, was appointed Shadow Chancellor in June 1998. Born in 1953, he was educated at Abingdon School, Corpus Christi College, Cambridge and the College of Law, and is married with five children. He started his political life as the MP for North Warwickshire from 1983-92, throughout which he took up a number of posts in the DTI, foreign office and the treasury, as well as becoming assistant Government Whip. In June 1992, he was created a Privy Counsellor in the Dissolution Honours List, and has been MP for Horsham since 1997. 2 Why the global economy needs nations Introduction Some commentators love globalisation rather as football pundits love the FA Cup Final.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)
    Monday Volume 572 9 December 2013 No. 90 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Monday 9 December 2013 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2013 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. HER MAJESTY’S GOVERNMENT MEMBERS OF THE CABINET (FORMED BY THE RT HON.DAVID CAMERON,MP,MAY 2010) PRIME MINISTER,FIRST LORD OF THE TREASURY AND MINISTER FOR THE CIVIL SERVICE—The Rt Hon. David Cameron, MP DEPUTY PRIME MINISTER AND LORD PRESIDENT OF THE COUNCIL—The Rt Hon. Nick Clegg, MP FIRST SECRETARY OF STATE AND SECRETARY OF STATE FOR FOREIGN AND COMMONWEALTH AFFAIRS—The Rt Hon. William Hague, MP CHANCELLOR OF THE EXCHEQUER—The Rt Hon. George Osborne, MP CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE TREASURY—The Rt Hon. Danny Alexander, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT—The Rt Hon. Theresa May, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR DEFENCE—The Rt Hon. Philip Hammond, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR BUSINESS,INNOVATION AND SKILLS—The Rt Hon. Vince Cable, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR WORK AND PENSIONS—The Rt Hon. Iain Duncan Smith, MP LORD CHANCELLOR AND SECRETARY OF STATE FOR JUSTICE—The Rt Hon. Chris Grayling, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR EDUCATION—The Rt Hon. Michael Gove, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR COMMUNITIES AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT—The Rt Hon. Eric Pickles, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR HEALTH—The Rt Hon. Jeremy Hunt, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT,FOOD AND RURAL AFFAIRS—The Rt Hon. Owen Paterson, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT—The Rt Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • Cross-Border Provision of Public Services for Wales: Follow–Up
    House of Commons Welsh Affairs Committee Cross-border provision of public services for Wales: follow–up Tenth Report of Session 2009–10 Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 2 March 2010 HC 26 Published on 11 March 2010 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Welsh Affairs Committee The Welsh Affairs Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Office of the Secretary of State for Wales (including relations with the National Assembly for Wales). Current membership Dr Hywel Francis MP (Labour, Aberavon) (Chairman) Mr David T.C. Davies MP (Conservative, Monmouth) Ms Nia Griffith MP (Labour, Llanelli) Mrs Siân C. James MP (Labour, Swansea East) Mr David Jones MP (Conservative, Clwyd West) Mr Martyn Jones MP (Labour, Clwyd South) Rt Hon Alun Michael MP (Labour and Co-operative, Cardiff South and Penarth) Mr Albert Owen MP (Labour, Ynys Môn) Mr Mark Pritchard MP (Conservative, The Wrekin) Mr Mark Williams MP (Liberal Democrat, Ceredigion) Mr Hywel Williams MP (Plaid Cymru, Caernarfon) Powers The committee is one of the Departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publications The reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. All publications of the Committee (including press notices) are on the internet at www.parliament.uk/parliamentary_committees/welsh_affairs_committee.cfm.
    [Show full text]
  • NEC Annual Report 2019
    Labour Party | Annual Report 2019 LABOUR PARTY ANNUAL REPORT 2019 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION Treasurers’ Responsibilities . 54 Foreword from Jeremy Corbyn . 5 Independent Auditor’s Report Introduction from Tom Watson . 7 to the members of the Labour Party . 55 Introduction from the General Secretary . 9 Consolidated income and expenditure account 2018/2019 National Executive Committee . 10 for the year ended 31 December 2018 . 57 NEC Committees . 12 Statements of comprehensive income Obituaries . 13 and changes in equity for the year ended NEC aims and objectives for 2019 . 14 31 December 2018 . 58 Consolidated balance sheet BY-ELECTIONS . 15 at 31 December 2018 . 59 Peterborough . 16 Consolidated cash flow statement for the year Newport West . 17 ended 31 December 2018 . 60 ELECTIONS 2019 . 19 Notes to Financial Statements . 61 Analysis . 20 APPENDICES . 75 Local Government Report . 23 Members of Shadow Cabinet LOOKING AHEAD: 2020 ELECTIONS . 25 and Opposition Frontbench . 76 The year ahead in Scotland . 26 Parliamentary Labour Party . 80 The year ahead in Wales . 27 Members of the Scottish Parliament. 87 NEC PRIORITIES FOR 2019 . 29 Members of the Welsh Assembly . 88 Members and Supporters Members of the European Parliament . 89 Renewing our party and building an active Directly Elected Mayors . 90 membership and supporters network . 30 Members of the London Assembly . 91 Equalities . 31 Leaders of Labour Groups . 92 Labour Peers . 100 NEC PRIORITIES FOR 2019 . 35 Labour Police and Crime Commissioners . 103 National Policy Forum Parliamentary Candidates endorsed NPF Report . 36 by the NEC at time of publication . 104 NEC PRIORITIES FOR 2019 . 39 NEC Disputes . 107 International NCC Cases .
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix: “Ideology, Grandstanding, and Strategic Party Disloyalty in the British Parliament”
    Appendix: \Ideology, Grandstanding, and Strategic Party Disloyalty in the British Parliament" August 8, 2017 Appendix Table of Contents • Appendix A: Wordscores Estimation of Ideology • Appendix B: MP Membership in Ideological Groups • Appendix C: Rebellion on Different Types of Divisions • Appendix D: Models of Rebellion on Government Sponsored Bills Only • Appendix E: Differences in Labour Party Rebellion Following Leadership Change • Appendix F: List of Party Switchers • Appendix G: Discussion of Empirical Model Appendix A: Wordscores Estimation of Ideology This Appendix describes our method for ideologically scaling British MPs using their speeches on the welfare state, which were originally produced for a separate study on welfare reform (O'Grady, 2017). We cover (i) data collection, (ii) estimation, (iii) raw results, and (iv) validity checks. The resulting scales turn out to be highly valid, and provide an excellent guide to MPs' ideologies using data that is completely separate to the voting data that forms the bulk of the evidence in our paper. A1: Collection of Speech Data Speeches come from an original collection of every speech made about issues related to welfare in the House of Commons from 1987-2007, covering the period over which the Labour party moved 1 to the center under Tony Blair, adopted and enacted policies of welfare reform, and won office at the expense of the Conservatives. Restricting the speeches to a single issue area is useful for estimating ideologies because with multiple topics there is a danger of conflating genuine extremism (a tendency to speak in extreme ways) with a tendency or requirement to talk a lot about topics that are relatively extreme to begin with (Lauderdale and Herzog, 2016).
    [Show full text]
  • Global Tax Reform: Who's Leading, Who's Lagging, and Is the US in The
    Tax Foundation “Global Tax Reform: Who’s Leading, Who’s Lagging, and Is the U.S in the Race?” November 18, 2004 How Will Large Advanced Economies Respond to these Global Trends? Scott Hodge: We’ve asked our next three panelists to answer a couple of key questions. What is the influence of the new competitive global environment on their economies and tax policies? And how have they reconciled the need for tax revenues with the need to promote competition and at the same time maintain fairness in the system? And then what are the emerging challenges for tax reform in their countries going forward? And I’m very delighted to have our three panelists with us today. I’ll introduce all of them and then we’ll go in order. Starting with Dawn Primarolo, who is a member of Parliament and Paymaster General in the United Kingdom. As Paymaster General, Ms. Primarolo has a strategic oversight over the UK tax system as a whole, including direct, indirect corporate taxation, capital gains tax, inheritance tax, VAT, European and international tax issues. That’s a very, very 1 broad portfolio to be able to get your arms around. She’s been a member of Parliament for South Bristol since 1987. And our second speaker will be Vadim Grishin who is the head of the Economic Office at the Embassy of the Russian Federation. We’re very delighted that Mr. Grishin has joined us today. He concentrates his activities within the Economic Office on expanding Russian/American economic partnerships, especially business dialogues in promising fields such as energy, high technology and finance.
    [Show full text]