DOCSLIB.ORG

Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Thursday Volume 545 17 May 2012 No. 6 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Thursday 17 May 2012 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2012 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Parliamentary Click-Use Licence, available online through The National Archives website at www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/information-management/our-services/parliamentary-licence-information.htm Enquiries to The National Archives, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 4DU; e-mail: [email protected] 671 17 MAY 2012 672 message goes out that the solar industry is back in House of Commons business and on a sound footing. There will be many more solar installations compared with what happened Thursday 17 May 2012 under the solar installation regime we inherited from the Labour party. The House met at half-past Ten o’clock Caroline Flint (Don Valley) (Lab): Last week, just 900 installations took place and two thirds of businesses had empty order books, but my question is about the PRAYERS Government’s next round of cuts to solar, which is due on 1 July. Last night, the Minister of State, Department of Energy and Climate Change, the hon. Member for [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] Bexhill and Battle (Gregory Barker), tweeted: “Having listened carefully to industry, we are looking at scope for pushing back a little the next proposed reduction in the #solar Oral Answers to Questions tariffs”. The truth is that the Government have missed the deadline legally required to provide notice to Parliament for the next round of cuts to come into force. Is not the ENERGY AND CLIMATE CHANGE Government’s incompetence the real reason why they are backtracking? The Secretary of State was asked— Mr Davey: The right hon. Lady seems to think that Feed-in Tariffs we should not listen to the industry, but I do. We are considering tweaking the start date for the next tariff 1. Diana Johnson (Kingston upon Hull North) (Lab): reduction—if we change it, it will be a tweak, not a What assessment he has made of the effect of changes massive change. She needs to understand that the changes to the feed-in tariff on the number of solar PV that we have consulted on and are introducing will bring stability and mean that we have solar power for installations in the last 12 months. [107609] the many, not the few. The Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change (Mr Edward Davey): In the last 12 months, there have Caroline Flint: There will be laughs echoing outside been approximately 270,000 photovoltaic installations the Chamber at the Secretary of State’s suggestion that registered on the microgeneration certification scheme the Government have been listening to the industry, database, against a forecast of just 35,000 installations but my question was about parliamentary procedure. when the scheme was launched in 2010. Moreover, Parliamentary procedure requires that due notice must having substantially reduced the cost of each installation be given in advance of the cuts being brought into force to electricity bill payers, the coalition is now in a position on 1 July. My understanding is that the Department has to significantly expand the ambition of the feed-in missed—legally—the deadline required. Will the Secretary tariffs scheme. of State therefore confirm whether the Department has missed the deadline required to give notice to Parliament? Diana Johnson: Following the chaotic cut to the feed-in If it has, it is absolutely the truth that the Government tariff, there has been a 90% fall in solar panel installations, cannot legally impose the cuts on 1 July. Why does the and 6,000 jobs have gone in the industry, including Secretary of State not just own up, end the uncertainty more than 100 in my constituency of Kingston upon and commit to scrapping the next round of cuts on Hull North. Does not the Government’s mismanagement 1 July? and this debacle mean that the industry could be strangled at birth? It also puts at risk investment in the renewables Mr Davey: The right hon. Lady started by saying that industry, which is so important to areas such as Hull. the industry will be laughing, but Paul Barwell, the chief executive of the Solar Trade Association, said in Mr Davey: I am surprised the hon. Lady reaches that The Independent on 9 May 2012: conclusion. Since the 21p tariff came in 10 weeks ago, “The current 21p subsidy can actually give a return up to there have been more than 26,000 installations with 10 per cent, tax-free, index-linked, for 25 years, making it one of 86 MW of capacity, which is equivalent to the installation the most attractive investments around.” rate achieved in August 2011, when the tariff was at That is what the industry is saying. The Government 43p. The installation rate in the period is 1.7 times what will abide by all the procedures required by the House it was in the same period last year. and lay the regulations when required. Mr Philip Hollobone (Kettering) (Con): Feed-in tariffs Green Deal are not the only way to encourage solar PV installations. Can more be done with building regulations, especially to encourage solar to be built in to new-build properties 2. David Rutley (Macclesfield) (Con): What progress at the start? his Department has made on the introduction of the green deal. [107611] Mr Davey: I am sure local authorities will look at that proposal, but the key thing is to ensure that our new, 3. Tom Brake (Carshalton and Wallington) (LD): more stable and predictable regime supports the solar What progress his Department has made on preparatory industry, as we believe it will. We need to ensure that the work on the green deal. [107612] 673 Oral Answers17 MAY 2012 Oral Answers 674 6. Damian Hinds (East Hampshire) (Con): What Amber Rudd: My hon. Friend has been kind enough progress his Department has made on the introduction to visit Hastings on several occasions, as he is a neighbouring of the green deal. [107615] MP, and will be aware that many of my constituents live in housing association property. How will the green deal 18. Amber Rudd (Hastings and Rye) (Con): What benefit residents in housing associations? progress his Department has made on the introduction of the green deal. [107627] Gregory Barker: Absolutely. I know that my hon. Friend is a terrific advocate for Hastings, and I can The Minister of State, Department of Energy and assure her that social housing will be among the first to Climate Change (Gregory Barker): The green deal is a benefit from the green deal revolution. Dedicated funding flagship policy for the coalition. We are making good within the £1.3 billion of energy company obligation progress towards the introduction of the green deal this subsidy will be focused on the most deprived areas of autumn. We are determined to have a solid framework the country, so I would expect areas such as Hastings to in place for this transformational scheme, which will be among the first to see the benefits. With her as its enable the green deal market to grow right through to MP, I am sure it will. the next decade and beyond. Dame Joan Ruddock (Lewisham, Deptford) (Lab): David Rutley: Macc2020, an active and energetic Will the Minister explain what happened to the community group in Macclesfield, has effectively used a 30,000 people who applied for help through Warm local energy assessment fund to stimulate take-up of Front last year? Despite an underspend, they did not the green deal among home owners and to promote get anything. Will he apologise to them for having to local small and medium-sized enterprises associated wait for this much heralded green deal and will it with energy efficiency. Does my hon. Friend agree that actually be delivered to the very poorest? I doubt it. that is the right approach given that economic development potential? Gregory Barker: I am pleased to say that since I became Minister in the right hon. Lady’s place, the Gregory Barker: Absolutely. Macclesfield is a terrific number of complaints about Warm Front has reduced example of community activity. That is exactly the kind substantially. She will know that there was a massive of approach we want to see followed across the whole complaint bag about Warm Front while she was in country. It will help get the green deal off to a strong office. We have not seen that since I entered office. Of start. It is great that my hon. Friend’s constituency is course we will continue to run Warm Front though next blazing a trail, and I congratulate everyone involved— year. It remains part of a suite of measures to tackle perhaps he will do so in person on my behalf—on fuel poverty, and we remain committed to doing much taking advantage of the DECC LEAF scheme to such more. good effect. Barry Gardiner (Brent North) (Lab): In the interests of transparency, will the Minister share with the House Tom Brake: I have had a very positive meeting on the the benchmarks he has set for the uptake of the green green deal with Sutton Seniors Forum, Ofgem and deal scheme in the first to third years and what emissions the Minister of State, Department of Health, my hon. reductions he has set as the benchmarks for the success Friend the Member for Sutton and Cheam (Paul Burstow). of the scheme? One issue that arose was the importance of providing clear information to people, particularly senior citizens.
Recommended publications
  • The Conservative Party's Credibility Deficit Updated Tax and Spending

    The Conservative Party's Credibility Deficit Updated Tax and Spending

    The Conservative Party’s credibility deficit Updated tax and spending commitments April 2010 2 Contents Page Introduction 5 Summary 7 Methodology 8 Tables 10 Broken promises 13 45,000 new single rooms in the NHS 15 5,000 new prison places 19 Reducing taxes on savings 22 More places for science courses, training and apprenticeships 24 Maternity nurses for all 25 Reinstate the Defence Export Services Organisation (DESO) 28 National Loan Guarantee Scheme 30 Tax cuts 33 Corporation tax and investment allowance changes 35 Freeze council tax for two years 38 Reduce employers’ NICs for some small companies 41 Tax cuts for married couples 43 Inheritance tax cuts 50 Reverse impact of abolition of dividend tax credit 53 Tax reversals 57 Raise National Insurance Contributions thresholds 59 Oppose Broadband levy 61 Oppose cider duty increase 63 Tax increases 65 Non-domicile levy 67 Spending reductions 73 Cut Government “waste” 75 Savings on employment and skills programmes 78 Reduce spending on Building Schools for the Future 83 Reduce eligibility for tax credits 85 Reduce eligibility for Child Trust Funds 88 Reduce government spending on consultants and advertising 90 Reduce “bureaucracy” spending by a third 92 Welfare savings 95 Scrap ContactPoint 98 NHS IT Programme 100 Freeze pay and cap pensions for public sector workers 103 Reduce spending on Sure Start outreach workers 105 3 Scrap some Regional Development Agencies 107 Scrap regional assemblies 109 Scrap identity cards 110 “Cutting the cost of politics” 112 Scrap the Trade Union Modernisation
  • Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)

    Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)

    Wednesday Volume 527 11 May 2011 No. 155 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Wednesday 11 May 2011 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2011 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Parliamentary Click-Use Licence, available online through The National Archives website at www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/information-management/our-services/parliamentary-licence-information.htm Enquiries to The National Archives, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 4DU; e-mail: [email protected] 1145 11 MAY 2011 1146 12. Andrew Selous (South West Bedfordshire) (Con): House of Commons What progress has been made on the Government’s commitment to undertake a process similar to the Wednesday 11 May 2011 Calman commission on devolution funding; and if she will make a statement. [54363] The House met at half-past Eleven o’clock The Secretary of State for Wales (Mrs Cheryl Gillan): Following the yes vote in the referendum on further PRAYERS powers, we have started to consider the scope and form of such a process. Now that the elections to the National [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] Assembly have taken place I intend to discuss the process with other stakeholders and the First Minister. May I also take this opportunity while I am at the Dispatch Box to offer our congratulations to Carwyn Oral Answers to Questions Jones, who is currently considering forming the Welsh Assembly Government and has the largest party in the Welsh Assembly? WALES Mary Macleod: Our priority in Wales and elsewhere The Secretary of State was asked— right now is to ensure that the deficit is under control.
  • ECON Thesaurus on Brexit

    ECON Thesaurus on Brexit

    STUDY Requested by the ECON Committee ECON Thesaurus on Brexit Fourth edition Policy Department for Economic, Scientific and Quality of Life Policies Authors: Stephanie Honnefelder, Doris Kolassa, Sophia Gernert, Roberto Silvestri Directorate General for Internal Policies of the Union July 2017 EN DIRECTORATE GENERAL FOR INTERNAL POLICIES POLICY DEPARTMENT A: ECONOMIC AND SCIENTIFIC POLICY ECON Thesaurus on Brexit Fourth edition Abstract This thesaurus is a collection of ECON related articles, papers and studies on the possible withdrawal of the UK from the EU. Recent literature from various sources is categorised, chronologically listed – while keeping the content of previous editions - and briefly summarised. To facilitate the use of this tool and to allow an easy access, certain documents may appear in more than one category. The thesaurus is non-exhaustive and may be updated. This document was provided by Policy Department A at the request of the ECON Committee. IP/A/ECON/2017-15 July 2017 PE 607.326 EN This document was requested by the European Parliament's Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs. AUTHORS Stephanie HONNEFELDER Doris KOLASSA Sophia GERNERT, trainee Roberto SILVESTRI, trainee RESPONSIBLE ADMINISTRATOR Stephanie HONNEFELDER Policy Department A: Economic and Scientific Policy European Parliament B-1047 Brussels E-mail: [email protected] LINGUISTIC VERSIONS Original: EN ABOUT THE EDITOR Policy departments provide in-house and external expertise to support EP committees and other parliamentary bodies
  • 2013 Automotive Sustainability Report the 14Th Edition - 2012 Data

    2013 Automotive Sustainability Report the 14Th Edition - 2012 Data

    2013 Automotive Sustainability Report The 14th edition - 2012 data SMMT, the ‘S’ symbol and the ‘Driving the motor industry’ brandline are trademarks of SMMT Ltd. IN SUMMARY Percentage change 2011 2012 2012 on 2011 ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE Automotive manufacturing sector turnover* (£ billion) 57.7 59.3 2.8 Expenditure on business R&D* (£ billion) 1.5 1.7 9.2 Total number of cars and CVs produced (million) (UK) (WI) 1.5 1.6 7.7 Total new cars and CV registrations (million) (UK) (WI) 2.2 2.3 1.7 Signatories’ combined turnover (£ billion) (AS) 49.6 58.2 17.5 Total number of vehicles produced (million) (AS) 1.4 1.5 9.4 ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE Production inputs Total combined energy use (GWh) (AS) 5,010 4,628 -7.6 Energy used per vehicle produced (MWh/unit) (VMs) 2.3 2.2 -4.8 Total combined water use (000m3) (AS) 5,481 5,765 5.2 Water use per vehicle produced (m3/unit) (VMs) 3.0 2.9 -2.1 Material output Total combined CO2 equivalents (tonnes) (AS) 1,600,148 1,420,805 -11.2 CO2 equivalents per vehicle produced (tonnes/unit) (VMs) 0.68 0.66 -3.2 Volatile Organic Compounds emissions (cars) (g/m2) (VMs) 35.4 35.3 -0.2 Volatile Organic Compounds emissions (vans) (g/m2) (VMs) 61.4 60.5 -1.4 Total combined waste to landfill (tonnes) (AS) 14,780 11,661 -21.1 Waste to landfill per vehicle produced (kg/unit) (VMs) 7.1 5.9 -16.7 Vehicle use Average new car CO2 emissions (g/km) (AC) 138.1 133.1 -3.6 SOCIAL PERFORMANCE Number of jobs dependent on the sector* (‘000) (WI) 746 731 -2.0 Combined number of employees (AS) 79,641 83,308 4.6 Number of lost-time incidents (AS) 185 178 -3.8 Number of training days per employee (AS) 3.2 2.7 -14.8 (WI) Whole industry data; (AC) All car registrations in the UK; (AS) All signatories; (VMs) UK vehicle manufacturer signatories; (CV) Commercial vehicles; (CO2) Carbon dioxide.
  • 'The Left's Views on Israel: from the Establishment of the Jewish State To

    'The Left's Views on Israel: from the Establishment of the Jewish State To

    ‘The Left’s Views on Israel: From the establishment of the Jewish state to the intifada’ Thesis submitted by June Edmunds for PhD examination at the London School of Economics and Political Science 1 UMI Number: U615796 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U615796 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 F 7377 POLITI 58^S8i ABSTRACT The British left has confronted a dilemma in forming its attitude towards Israel in the postwar period. The establishment of the Jewish state seemed to force people on the left to choose between competing nationalisms - Israeli, Arab and later, Palestinian. Over time, a number of key developments sharpened the dilemma. My central focus is the evolution of thinking about Israel and the Middle East in the British Labour Party. I examine four critical periods: the creation of Israel in 1948; the Suez war in 1956; the Arab-Israeli war of 1967 and the 1980s, covering mainly the Israeli invasion of Lebanon but also the intifada. In each case, entrenched attitudes were called into question and longer-term shifts were triggered in the aftermath.
  • Supplier Performance and the Smicop Domestic Monitoring and Compliance Survey Report: Results for Smart Meter Installations Occu

    Supplier Performance and the Smicop Domestic Monitoring and Compliance Survey Report: Results for Smart Meter Installations Occu

    Supplier Performance and the SMICoP Domestic Monitoring and Compliance Survey Report: Results for Smart Meter Installations occurring from October to December 2019 Published 30 June 2020 Page 1 of 26 30 Jun 2020 Summary The Smart Meter Installation Code of Practice (SMICoP) is a set of rules that energy suppliers must follow when installing smart meters in homes and smaller businesses. To make sure these standards have been met by the energy suppliers, a sample of customers are asked about their experiences when their smart meter was installed. These surveys are carried out by independent survey organisations on behalf of energy suppliers. More information regarding the methodology can be found within the Annex A of this report. The Monitoring and Compliance Customer Survey (MCCS) report was established to show if energy suppliers have met their obligations and responsibilities set out in the SMICoP rules. This report provides a summary of the answer’s customers gave about what happened when a smart meter was installed in their home. Some of the questions within the report show how your energy supplier is performing when installing smart meters in homes compared to other suppliers. Some of the questions within the report do not demonstrate the performance of an energy supplier if looked at on their own. For the questions that don’t indicate a better or worse performance, that are intended to help qualify1 a subsequent question, the information is presented listed by supplier in alphabetical order in black shaded tables and figures. Where suppliers’ performance is ranked highest to lowest, these are shown in blue shaded tables and figures.
  • Z675928x Margaret Hodge Mp 06/10/2011 Z9080283 Lorely

    Z675928x Margaret Hodge Mp 06/10/2011 Z9080283 Lorely

    Z675928X MARGARET HODGE MP 06/10/2011 Z9080283 LORELY BURT MP 08/10/2011 Z5702798 PAUL FARRELLY MP 09/10/2011 Z5651644 NORMAN LAMB 09/10/2011 Z236177X ROBERT HALFON MP 11/10/2011 Z2326282 MARCUS JONES MP 11/10/2011 Z2409343 CHARLOTTE LESLIE 12/10/2011 Z2415104 CATHERINE MCKINNELL 14/10/2011 Z2416602 STEPHEN MOSLEY 18/10/2011 Z5957328 JOAN RUDDOCK MP 18/10/2011 Z2375838 ROBIN WALKER MP 19/10/2011 Z1907445 ANNE MCINTOSH MP 20/10/2011 Z2408027 IAN LAVERY MP 21/10/2011 Z1951398 ROGER WILLIAMS 21/10/2011 Z7209413 ALISTAIR CARMICHAEL 24/10/2011 Z2423448 NIGEL MILLS MP 24/10/2011 Z2423360 BEN GUMMER MP 25/10/2011 Z2423633 MIKE WEATHERLEY MP 25/10/2011 Z5092044 GERAINT DAVIES MP 26/10/2011 Z2425526 KARL TURNER MP 27/10/2011 Z242877X DAVID MORRIS MP 28/10/2011 Z2414680 JAMES MORRIS MP 28/10/2011 Z2428399 PHILLIP LEE MP 31/10/2011 Z2429528 IAN MEARNS MP 31/10/2011 Z2329673 DR EILIDH WHITEFORD MP 31/10/2011 Z9252691 MADELEINE MOON MP 01/11/2011 Z2431014 GAVIN WILLIAMSON MP 01/11/2011 Z2414601 DAVID MOWAT MP 02/11/2011 Z2384782 CHRISTOPHER LESLIE MP 04/11/2011 Z7322798 ANDREW SLAUGHTER 05/11/2011 Z9265248 IAN AUSTIN MP 08/11/2011 Z2424608 AMBER RUDD MP 09/11/2011 Z241465X SIMON KIRBY MP 10/11/2011 Z2422243 PAUL MAYNARD MP 10/11/2011 Z2261940 TESSA MUNT MP 10/11/2011 Z5928278 VERNON RODNEY COAKER MP 11/11/2011 Z5402015 STEPHEN TIMMS MP 11/11/2011 Z1889879 BRIAN BINLEY MP 12/11/2011 Z5564713 ANDY BURNHAM MP 12/11/2011 Z4665783 EDWARD GARNIER QC MP 12/11/2011 Z907501X DANIEL KAWCZYNSKI MP 12/11/2011 Z728149X JOHN ROBERTSON MP 12/11/2011 Z5611939 CHRIS
  • Japan Securities Summit 4 March 2019

    Japan Securities Summit 4 March 2019

    Japan Securities Summit 4 March 2019 Mansion House London Japan Securities Dealers Association (JSDA) with the support of the International Capital Market Association (ICMA) Japan Securities Summit Contents Welcome message from Mr. Taro Aso, Deputy Prime Minister of Japan Messages from the organisers Programme Speaker biographies About the organisers Supporting Partners Media Partner Join the ICMA Events App Event code: jss2019 iPhone Android QR code QR code 01 Welcome message from Mr. Taro Aso, Deputy Prime Minister I would like to welcome you all to the Japan Securities Summit in London. More than six years have passed since digitalization, and we will strive to pursue the Abe Administration was inaugurated the objectives in the “Financial Services in December 2012. In order to break out Policy: Assessments and Strategic of prolonged deflation, the Prime Minister Priorities” to transform the Financial has placed top priority on revitalizing the Services Agency from the Financial Japanese economy and has advanced Sanction Agency to the Financial Services an economic policy package comprising Development Agency. (i) bold monetary policy, (ii) flexible fiscal policy, and (iii) a growth strategy that In addition, we have continued to work encourages private sector investment. to maintain the long-term soundness of Japan’s financial system and to facilitate Resulting from such efforts, the nominal financial intermediation amid the evolving GDP of the Japanese economy is financial environment. expected to mark a record high for four straight years. In addition, although the In Japan, the household sector holds a stock market showed some fluctuations tremendous pool of financial assets, and from the end of last year to the beginning more than half of them, about 8 trillion of this year, corporate operating income dollars, are deposits and cash.
  • Women Mps in Westminster Photographs Taken May 21St, June 3Rd, June 4Th, 2008

    Women Mps in Westminster Photographs Taken May 21St, June 3Rd, June 4Th, 2008

    “The House of Commons Works of Art Collection documents significant moments in Parliamentary history. We are delighted to have added this unique photographic record of women MPs of today, to mark the 90th anniversary of women first being able to take their seats in this House” – Hugo Swire, Chairman, The Speaker's Advisory Committee on Works of Art. “The day the Carlton Club accepted women” – 90 years after women first got the vote aim to ensure that a more enduring image of On May 21st 2008 over half of all women women's participation in the political process Members of Parliament in Westminster survives. gathered party by party to have group photographs taken to mark the anniversary of Each party gave its permission for the 90 years since women first got the vote (in photographs to be taken. For the Labour February 1918 women over 30 were first Party, Barbara Follett MP, the then Deputy granted the vote). Minister for Women and Equality, and Barbara Keeley MP, who was Chair of the Labour Party Women’s Committee and The four new composite Caroline Adams, who works for the photographs taken party by Parliamentary Labour Party helped ensure that all but 12 of the Labour women party aim to ensure that a attended. more enduring image of For the Conservative women's participation in the Party, The Shadow Leader of the House of political process survives Commons and Shadow Minister for Until now the most often used photographic Women, Theresa May image of women MPs had been the so called MP and the Chairman “Blair Babes” picture taken on 7th May 1997 of the Conservative shortly after 101 Labour women were elected Party, Caroline to Westminster as a result of positive action by Spelman MP, enlisted the Labour Party.
  • The Financial Services Trade and Investment Board Annual Report 2018

    The Financial Services Trade and Investment Board Annual Report 2018

    The Financial Services Trade and Investment Board Annual Report 2018 February 2019 The Financial Services Trade and Investment Board Annual Report 2018 February 2019 © Crown copyright 2019 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/version/3 or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: [email protected]. Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This publication is available at www.gov.uk/government/publications Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at [email protected] ISBN 978-1-912809-39-4 PU2232 Contents Foreword 2 Chapter 1 Introduction 4 Chapter 2 Annual progress report 6 Chapter 3 Board structure 17 Financial Services Trade and Investment Board Annual Report 2018 Foreword The UK is a global centre for international finance with markets that serve customers, companies, and investors here at home and across the world. We have a unique business environment and financial ecosystem, recognised globally for its high standards, diversity, and equal treatment of all. Underpinning this are three pillars – innovation, resilience and openness – that have been historical strengths and are an underlying foundation of the UK’s financial sector. Financial services play a fundamental role in the UK economy. The sector employs over one million people and in 2017-18 the sector accounted for over 10% of total UK tax receipts.
  • Over the Years

    Over the Years

    Over the Years Indra Rai Sharma Over the Years -A Photo Autobiography In 2010 before going to US, I had been going through my old papers. As it appeared, I had wished to pen down my autobiography long back. In my diary on February 10, 1963, I had written that if I would ever write my autobiography, I would caption it ‘My Life and Dreams’. In 1997 again, in my acceptance letter to the notice regarding my impending retirement that I sent on June 23, to Mr. A. Sankara Narayanan, Executive Director, M/S Hindustan Motors, I wrote: “I wish I could pen down my years at HM some day and hope that it would provide useful insight for our budding engineers as Lee Iacocca’s biography or the book ’On a clear day you can see General Motors’ provided to millions of it readers.’ I knew that I was not that great a name in HM or industry, though I aspired to be one. Perhaps I didn’t select the right profession or I couldn’t take advantage of the opportunity that I got to convert the same to become big. I remember my teasing of my grandmother and later on my mother in school days by telling them time and again that they should not expect me to do routine household work, as I would be a big man. Later on I joked with some close friends and their wives that one day I would get into number 1 Rajpath. I meant Rastrapati Bhawan. I failed to become as great or big as I wanted but I did work very hard for every assignment that I got.
  • UNITED KINGDOM Aid C 4/2002 (Ex N 594/01) — Vauxhall/Ellesmere

    UNITED KINGDOM Aid C 4/2002 (Ex N 594/01) — Vauxhall/Ellesmere

    C 77/28EN Official Journal of the European Communities 28.3.2002 STATE AID — UNITED KINGDOM Aid C 4/2002 (ex N 594/01) — Vauxhall/Ellesmere Port Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty (2002/C 77/05) (Text with EEA relevance) By means of the letter dated 23 January 2002, reproduced in the authentic language on the pages following this summary, the Commission notified the United Kingdom of its decision to initiate the procedure laid down in Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty concerning the abovementioned aid. Interested parties may submit their comments on the aid in respect of which the Commission is initiating the procedure within one month of the date of publication of this summary and the following letter, to: European Commission Directorate-General for Competition State Aid Registry B-1049 Brussels Fax (32-2) 296 12 42. These comments will be communicated to the United Kingdom. Confidential treatment of the identity of the interested party submitting the comments may be requested in writing, stating the reasons for the request. SUMMARY Assessment The aid is assessed under the Community framework for State Procedure aid to the motor vehicle industry. According to this framework, the Commission shall ensure that the aid granted is both The aid proposal was notified on 23 August 2001. The necessary for the realisation of the project and proportional Commission asked additional questions on 23 October 2001, to the gravity of the problems. to which the United Kingdom replied by letter dated 16 November 2001. In order to demonstrate the necessity for regional aid, the aid recipient must clearly prove that it has an economically viable Description alternative location for its project.