Gendered Morality: Masculinity, Marriage, and Social Relations in Premodern Islamic Ethics (Under the Direction of Carl Ernst and Juliane Hammer)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
GENDERED MORALITY: !MASCULINITY, MARRIAGE, AND SOCIAL RELATIONS IN PREMODERN ISLAMIC ETHICS !Zahra M. Shoaib Ayubi A dissertation submitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Religious Studies Chapel Hill 2015 Approved by: Carl Ernst Juliane Hammer Kecia Ali Omid Safi Randall Styers c 2015 Zahra M. Shoaib Ayubi ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT ZAHRA AYUBI: Gendered Morality: Masculinity, Marriage, and Social Relations in Premodern Islamic Ethics (Under the direction of Carl Ernst and Juliane Hammer) This dissertation analyzes gender constructions and notions of moral gender relations in three widely influential medieval Persian treatises of Islamic ethics (akhlaq), Kimiya-i Sa`adat by Abu Hamid Muhammad al-Ghazali (d. 1111), Akhlaq-i Nasiri by Nasir-ad Din Tusi (d. 1274), and Akhlaq-i Jalali by Jalal ad-Din Davani (d. 1502). In examining these prescriptive works that instruct Muslims on how to live ethical lives, the main question I ask is how have medieval Muslim ethicists constructed morally guided notions of masculinity, femininity, and marriage and male homosocial relations. I argue that these texts reveal a metaphysical tension between an ethical principle that all human selves (nafses) are created equal and a hierarchical organization of humanity based on intellect and spirituality, in which some men are above others based on ethical and rational capacity and all men are above women. The ethicists define ultimate masculinity in terms of power, intellectual potential, and ethical comportment in the domestic realm as well as in homosocial structures of court, civic, and community life. They define women as instrumental to men's ethical activities since they view women themselves as lacking full rationality and limited by their biological functions. iii To my family, from whom I learn lessons in ethics everyday. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Bism Allah ar-Rahman ar-Rahim. First and foremost, I would like to record the deep personal sacrifices of my mother, father, husband, and child in helping me com- plete this dissertation and launching my academic career. My father in-law Dr. Ali Soltani, who was fond of the Kimiya-i Sa`adat and the Akhlaq-i Nasiri, introduced me to the field of akhlaq in the brief time that I spent with him before his passing and inspired me to study ethics. My late uncle, Dr. Zobair Ayubi, expressed great un- derstanding and encouragement for my scholarly pursuits. I dedicate my dissertation to these family members. From my primary to quaternary education, my family has always supported me. A special thanks to my beloved mentor in memoriam, the late Tayyibah Taylor, who celebrated my scholarly pursuits, reminded me to remain humble in sharing my knowledge, and demonstrated to me how to be a strong, yet spiritual Muslim woman. Although she was not a scholar, she was among the most learned and intelligent women I have ever known. Next, I extend my gratitude to my first advisor in academia, Kecia Ali, who recog- nized scholarly potential in me as an undergraduate and has been working closely with me at various stages throughout my graduate career. I greatly appreciate her extensive comments on an early draft of this work. I thank Carl Ernst, for being an impeccable scholarly role model for me, for pushing me to think about my project in relation to broader conversations and its own contribution, and for welcoming me into his silsila. Thanks to Juliane Hammer, for pushing me to ask big questions with regard to my scholarship and for reassuring me that being a mother and a productive scholar is an achievable goal. Thanks also to Omid Safi for helping me think through historical ques- tions, find my grounding in Islamic Studies, showing me how to navigate the field, and v for demonstrating how to be a scholar-activist. Thanks to Randall Styers for providing me with theoretical training in the study of religion and flawless professional advice. Thanks to Professor Nasrollah Pourjavady for introducing me to the inner workings of Islamic philosophy as a genre. I also acknowledge Professors Bruce Lawrence and Ebrahim Moosa for helping me find my scholarly direction, early in my graduate train- ing. I would like to thank my friends and colleagues from my graduate program at UNC Chapel Hill, in particular, Ilyse Morgenstein Fuerst, Jill Peterfeso, and Rose Aslan for their support during the graduate struggle and more. I would like to acknowledge the support of Stanford University's Abbassi Center of Islamic Studies, where I was a vis- iting scholar for two years. At Dartmouth College, I have deep gratitude for Annabel Martin, Amy Allen, and Cristen Brooks from the Women's and Gender Studies Pro- gram for providing a wonderful scholarly home for me during the final stages of writing this dissertation. Thanks to Kevin Reinhart, who has been a warm and welcoming colleague. I appreciate my students at Dartmouth, in particular Iman AbdoulKarim, Saaid Arshad, and Maieda Janjua, who have helped me to articulate my research for teaching purposes. The women at Azizah Magazine namely, Azizah Kahera, Mariam Aziz, Nina So- erakoesoemah, Ume Naqvi, and the entire editorial team have provided me with sis- terhood and helped me keep in touch with voices of \real" Muslim women. Finally, I would like to thank friends in the field, Jessica Chen, Sajida Jalalzai, Aysha Hidayat- ullah, Amanullah De Sondy, and Farah Zeb for their solidarity throughout the years. vi TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Sources . .5 1.1.1 Kimiya-i Sa`adat .......................... 11 1.1.2 Akhlaq-i Nasiri ........................... 14 1.1.3 Akhlaq-i Jalali ............................ 18 1.2 Chapter Outline . 21 1.3 Socio-Political Context of the Middle Periods . 23 1.3.1 Political History . 25 1.3.2 Women and Gender in Pre-modern Persianate Muslim Society . 35 1.4 Defining Islamic Ethics . 44 1.4.1 Kalam as Islamic Ethics and Shared Debates in Akhlaq ..... 47 1.4.2 Fiqh as Islamic Ethics and its Relationship to Akhlaq ...... 51 1.4.3 Akhlaq as Islamic Ethics . 58 1.5 Themes and Theoretical Underpinnings of Study . 68 1.5.1 Concepts of Power . 68 1.5.2 Conceptions of Gender and Gender Relations . 70 1.5.3 Masculinity and Homosociality . 76 1.6 Self Positioning . 84 2 Ethical Perfection and Power of the (Hu)man's Soul 87 2.1 Gendered Grammar and The Nafs ..................... 89 2.2 Hierarchy of the Nafses: Animal, Vegetable, Man, and Woman . 94 vii 2.3 The Nafs of the Ethical Man . 103 2.3.1 The Rational Faculty: Its Masculine Power, Virtues and Vices . 110 2.3.2 The Irascible Faculty: Its Masculine Power, Virtues, and Vices . 120 2.3.3 The Concupiscible Faculty: Its Masculine and Feminine Power, Virtues, and Vices . 125 2.3.4 Justice: The Ultimate Virtue and Male Responsibility . 133 2.4 Chapter Conclusion . 144 3 Ethics of Marriage and the Domestic Economy 146 3.1 Ideal Husbands and Wives . 151 3.2 Married, Now What? Ethical Conduct in Marriage . 162 3.2.1 Marriage and Sexual Ethics . 169 3.2.2 Money and Marriage . 175 3.3 When and How to Divorce . 179 3.4 Parenting, Motherhood, and Fatherhood . 191 3.4.1 Raising Little Girls . 195 3.4.2 Raising Little Boys . 200 3.4.3 Mothers and Fathers: Rights of Parents . 212 3.5 Chapter Conclusion . 222 4 Homosocial Masculinity and the Ethics of Living in a Community 226 4.1 Institutions Shaping Homosocial Masculinity . 229 4.1.1 The Virtuous and Un-virtuous Cities . 232 4.1.2 The Historical Premodern Muslim Cities . 235 4.1.3 Theories of Social Classes . 243 4.2 Principles of Human Association: Love, Justice, and Hierarchy . 249 4.2.1 True Love: Mind Over Body . 257 4.2.2 Homosociality: Relationships Between Men . 264 4.2.3 Ethics of Male Homosocial Friendship . 266 4.2.4 Enmity Between Men . 279 viii 4.2.5 Ethics at Court . 283 4.2.6 Ethics for Interaction with Various \Classes" of Human Being . 297 4.3 Chapter Conclusion . 301 Conclusion 304 References 309 ix Chapter 1 Introduction In Ovidio Abdul Latif Salazar's 2004 dramatized documentary, al-Ghazali: The Alchemist of Happiness, a young Ghazali faces a crisis of faith and conscience after witnessing Baghdad's corrupt political climate. A dramatic recounting of his life that includes imagined verbal exchanges with his brother and Saljuq officials, is set against a staged backdrop of Ghazali's domestic life, complete with a beautiful wife and a young son and daughter. Ghazali is depicted as a troubled genius, contemplative, and ultimately resolute in leaving home for a long journey to Damascus, Jerusalem, and Makkah. In the climactic scene, Ghazali hugs his children, pauses to look at his wife but then turns to his brother and says, \You understand that I have to leave."1 Imme- diately after, the voice of Sufism scholar, Seyyed Hossein Nasr, describes the journey as, \the act, which makes Ghazali Ghazali, that's why we are speaking about him now, 900 years later. That is, he left his position, his wealth, his family, the world, and disappeared in order to rediscover certitude, in order to be honest with himself in understanding the nature of the divine reality."2 Ghazali's wife, played by a famous Iranian actress, appears several times during the course of the film, praying, receiving visits from Ghazali's doctors, delivering and pick- 1Al-Ghazali: The Alchemist of Happiness, directed by Ovidio Abdul Latif Salazar, Italy, 2004. 2Seyyed Hossein Nasr in Al-Ghazali: The Alchemist of Happiness 1 ing up trays of food for Ghazali, but is always silent; the filmmakers did not write any dialogue for her, as if such an omission were staying true to Ghazali's biographies.