DOCSLIB.ORG

Derivations Derivations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Derivations Derivations DERIVATIONS® DEMYSTIFYING RISK MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS VOLUME NO. 20 REVISIONS TO ACCOUNTING THE CHALLENGE RULES REOPENS DOOR TO DERIVATIVES IN CROSS-BORDER The global nature of the capital markets allows many companies to capture lower costs of FINANCING funds and greater market liquidity by raising capital outside their country of domicile. However, the full benefits of cheaper funding can only be realized if there is an Recent revisions to the new U.S. deri- economically viable, and financial statement friendly, method to convert foreign currency vatives accounting rules make it possible cash flows back into the company's functional currency. for U.S. GAAP issuers to again use cross- Long-term cross-currency interest rate swaps are a proven technique for addressing this currency interest rate swaps in global problem. They allow financing to be raised in the most efficient market, carry over the funding strategies. The changes restore financing advantages (cost, covenants, and rate character) from the source to the target financial statement hedge treatment for a currency, and eliminate currency risk on a cash-flow-neutral basis. widely used tool that enables borrowers to New U.S. accounting rules for derivatives and hedging activity have changed the financial access low cost capital across the world. statement impact of cross-currency interest rate swaps. The rules require mark-to-market treatment for derivative contracts, unless certain stringent hedge accounting rules are met, in which case deferral accounting is allowed. As initially written, the new rules excluded almost all cross-currency swaps from meeting hedge accounting guidelines. However, recent revisions now permit appropriately constructed transactions to qualify for hedge accounting. This allows all of the economic benefits of cross-currency swaps to be realized, while minimizing negative financial statement impact. FAS 133 Background In June 1998, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (FAS 133). FAS 133 was formally amended by FAS 138, and informally interpreted through discussions of the Derivative Implementation Group (DIG). The original rules, the amendment, and the interpretations collectively redefine hedge accounting practices, including the identification of hedgeable risks, designation and effectiveness, and accounting recognition and measurement. The fundamental principle of FAS 133 is that all derivative contracts are assets or liabilities that must be recorded on the balance sheet at fair value, with any changes in the fair value recognized in earnings unless specific hedge criteria are met. Changes in value of derivatives that do not qualify under the hedge accounting rules are always recorded in current period earnings. If a transaction qualifies under the hedge accounting rules of FAS 133, a company is allowed to offset the income statement impact of the change in fair value of the derivative. Hedging Cross-Border Funding To account for a cross-currency swap prior to the adoption of FAS 133, a company recorded interest expense at the rate paid on the functional currency leg of the swap. Changes in the value of the currency component of the swap were deferred and recorded as an offset to translation gains or losses on the debt. This hedge accounting treatment applied to foreign currency borrowings swapped back to the issuer's domestic currency. DEMYSTIFYING RISK MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS CONTINUED Under the original version of the FAS 133 rules, cross-currency interest rate swaps were not accorded hedge accounting treatment. The impact of this was to prevent borrowers from raising capital abroad for use domestically. Under the revised rules, a cross-currency interest rate swap is accounted for as a fair value or cash flow hedge, depending on the character of the target debt, as illustrated below. Where fair value hedge accounting is applied, changes in the value of the derivative, and changes in the value of the hedged, foreign-denominated debt are recorded in current earnings. To the extent that the changes offset each other, there is no net income statement impact. Where cash flow hedge accounting is applied, changes in the value of the derivative that are deemed effective are deferred into equity, and recognized in income, to offset interest and currency translation effects on the hedged, foreign currency debt. Case Study U.S. companies regularly make use of cross-border funding through bond issues in offshore markets. The example on the next page illustrates the economic and financial statement impacts of cross-border funding under the new U.S. accounting rules. A U.S. company can borrow USD domestically at T+1.50% (6.90% currently) fixed for 10 years. As an alternative, the company can issue 10 year Euro-denominated notes in London at a rate of 5.80% for 10 years. Since the borrower's objective is to raise USD, a cross-currency swap is used to convert the Euro-denominated notes to dollars. In the swap, the company agrees to receive a fixed Euro interest rate equal to the coupon on underlying issue, and pay a USD fixed rate of 6.65%. This represents a 25 basis point saving compared to issuing direct in the domestic U.S. market. In addition to the periodic exchange of interest payments, the swap incorporates an initial exchange of principal. The company delivers the Euro proceeds of the issue, and receives dollars with the exchange rate set at the spot rate on the date of issue. The company also agrees to a re-exchange of principal at maturity of the swap, using the Euros it receives in the re-exchange to redeem the bond issue, and delivering dollars to the swap counterparty at exactly the same rate used in the initial exchange. DEMYSTIFYING RISK MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS CONTINUED If the company issues EUR100MM in notes when the exchange rate is USD .90/EUR, it will deliver EUR100M and receive USD90M through the swap. At maturity, the flows are reversed. Economics: The cross-currency swap produces USD90M of new financing for the company at a saving of .25%, compared to direct USD issuance. The swap allows the company to draw on a pool of advantageously-priced capital outside its home market, broaden its investor base, and preserve its access to domestic capital sources for future use. Accounting: The cross-currency swap qualifies under FAS 133 as a cash flow hedge of the forecasted U.S. dollar equivalent of the Euro cash flows that are associated with the interest payments on the Euro debt issue. The swap is not eligible for short-cut treatment (only single currency interest rate swaps qualify), but can be expected to be highly effective, provided the key terms of the derivative are properly structured and closely matched to those of the bond issue it hedges. Because this is a cash flow hedge, financial statement effectiveness is calculated through the preparation of an Other Comprehensive Income (OCI) table. This table compares the cumulative change in the market value of the hedging derivative to the cumulative change in market value of the hedged asset or liability. The lesser of the absolute values of these two amounts is deemed to be the effective portion of the hedge gains or losses, and is recorded in OCI, a component of the equity section of the Balance Sheet. Changes in the value of the derivative hedge that are greater than or lesser than the value of the underlying asset or liability, represent ineffectiveness. An excess would be recorded in current earnings. If changes in the value of the derivative are less than the changes in value of the hedged cash flows, the shortfall is not recorded in current earnings. Under the cash flow hedge methodology, the effective gains and losses recorded in OCI are recognized into income on a pro-rata basis, in each time period that the company makes USD payments on the debt issuance. This treatment is appropriate as long as the hedge relationship meets the overall 80% - 125% effectiveness band required by the statement. DEMYSTIFYING RISK MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS CONTINUED Operational: To facilitate the preparation of the OCI table, and the measurement of effectiveness, companies need to value both the underlying liability and the derivative. The valuations are used to populate the OCI table, and as evidence of the highly-effective correlation of the hedging relationship. Although valuation of the derivative is a relatively straightforward matter (i.e. quotes from the swap counterparty are easily obtained), valuation of the underlying liability may be more complicated, depending on the nature of the instrument. On this topic, FAS 133 allows for alternative methodologies to provide the issuer more flexibility (i.e. other than quotes from financial intermediaries). SUMMARY Companies prefer to fund in the most efficient (lowest cost) market available to them. In some cases, the best alternative is to raise foreign currency funds, either through issuing debt in the name of the parent organization in a foreign country, or by issuing debt in the name of the foreign subsidiary, in that subsidiary's country of domicile. The amended rules of FAS 133 now allow the use of cross-currency interest rate swaps when hedging either type of foreign currency debt issuance. This allows a company to take advantage of the lower cost of funds available when funding in foreign currencies, and then use a cross- currency interest rate swap to convert the foreign cash flows back to their functional currency. While there are administrative issues involved in utilizing the cash flow hedge accounting model under FAS 133, the extra administrative effort is offset by potentially significant savings arising from tapping into low-cost sources of capital. Standard Report Disclaimer The opinions, estimates and projections contained herein are those of BMO Nesbitt Burns Inc. ("BMO NBI") as of the date hereof and are subject to change without notice.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Section 1256 and Foreign Currency Derivatives
    Section 1256 and Foreign Currency Derivatives Viva Hammer1 Mark-to-market taxation was considered “a fundamental departure from the concept of income realization in the U.S. tax law”2 when it was introduced in 1981. Congress was only game to propose the concept because of rampant “straddle” shelters that were undermining the U.S. tax system and commodities derivatives markets. Early in tax history, the Supreme Court articulated the realization principle as a Constitutional limitation on Congress’ taxing power. But in 1981, lawmakers makers felt confident imposing mark-to-market on exchange traded futures contracts because of the exchanges’ system of variation margin. However, when in 1982 non-exchange foreign currency traders asked to come within the ambit of mark-to-market taxation, Congress acceded to their demands even though this market had no equivalent to variation margin. This opportunistic rather than policy-driven history has spawned a great debate amongst tax practitioners as to the scope of the mark-to-market rule governing foreign currency contracts. Several recent cases have added fuel to the debate. The Straddle Shelters of the 1970s Straddle shelters were developed to exploit several structural flaws in the U.S. tax system: (1) the vast gulf between ordinary income tax rate (maximum 70%) and long term capital gain rate (28%), (2) the arbitrary distinction between capital gain and ordinary income, making it relatively easy to convert one to the other, and (3) the non- economic tax treatment of derivative contracts. Straddle shelters were so pervasive that in 1978 it was estimated that more than 75% of the open interest in silver futures were entered into to accommodate tax straddles and demand for U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Federal Government's Use of Interest Rate Swaps and Currency
    The Federal Government’s Use of Interest Rate Swaps and Currency Swaps John Kiff, Uri Ron, and Shafiq Ebrahim, Financial Markets Department • Interest rate swaps and currency swaps are swap agreement is a contract in which contracts in which counterparties agree to two counterparties arrange to exchange exchange cash flows according to a pre-arranged cash-flow streams over a period of time A according to a pre-arranged formula. Two formula. In its capacity as fiscal agent for the federal government, the Bank of Canada has of the most common swap agreements are interest rate carried out swap agreements since fiscal year swaps and currency swaps. In an interest rate swap, counterparties exchange a series of interest payments 1984/85. denominated in the same currency; in a currency • The government uses these swap agreements to swap, counterparties exchange a series of interest pay- obtain cost-effective financing, to fund its foreign ments denominated in different currencies. There is exchange reserves, and to permit flexibility in no exchange of principal in an interest rate swap, but a managing its liabilities. principal payment is exchanged at the beginning and • To minimize its exposure to counterparty credit upon maturity of a currency-swap agreement. risk, the government applies strict credit-rating The swaps market originated in the late 1970s, when criteria and conservative exposure limits based on simultaneous loans were arranged between British a methodology developed by the Bank for and U.S. entities to bypass regulatory barriers on the International Settlements. movement of foreign currency. The first-known foreign currency swap transaction was between the World • Between fiscal 1987/88 and 1994/95, the Bank and IBM in August 1981 and was arranged by government used domestic interest rate swaps to Salomon Brothers (Das 1994, 14–36).
    [Show full text]
  • European Tracker of Financing Measures
    20 May 2020 This publication provides a high level summary of the targeted measures taken in the United Kingdom and selected European jurisdictions, designed to support businesses and provide relief from the impact of COVID-19. This information has been put together with the assistance of Wolf Theiss for Austria, Stibbe for Benelux, Kromann Reumert for Denmark, Arthur Cox for Ireland, Gide Loyrette Nouel for France, Noerr for Germany, Gianni Origoni, Grippo, Capelli & Partners for Italy, BAHR for Norway, Cuatrecasas for Portugal and Spain, Roschier for Finland and Sweden, Bär & Karrer AG for Switzerland. We would hereby like to thank them very much for their assistance. Ropes & Gray is maintaining a Coronavirus resource centre at www.ropesgray.com/en/coronavirus which contains information in relation to multiple geographies and practices with our UK related resources here. JURISDICTION PAGE EU LEVEL ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 UNITED KINGDOM ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 8 IRELAND ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • DEPARTMENT of the TREASURY Determination of Foreign Exchange
    This document has been submitted to the Office of the Federal Register (OFR) for publication and is pending placement on public display at the OFR and publication in the Federal Register. The document may vary slightly from the published document if minor editorial changes have been made during the OFR review process. Upon publication in the Federal Register, the regulation can be found at http://www.gpoaccess.gov/fr/, www.regulations.gov, and at www.treasury.gov. The document published in the Federal Register is the official document. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Determination of Foreign Exchange Swaps and Foreign Exchange Forwards under the Commodity Exchange Act AGENCY: Department of the Treasury, Departmental Offices. ACTION: Notice of Proposed Determination. SUMMARY: The Commodity Exchange Act (―CEA‖), as amended by Title VII of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (―Dodd-Frank Act‖), authorizes the Secretary of the Treasury (―Secretary‖) to issue a written determination exempting foreign exchange swaps, foreign exchange forwards, or both, from the definition of a ―swap‖ under the CEA. The Secretary proposes to issue a determination that would exempt both foreign exchange swaps and foreign exchange forwards from the definition of ―swap,‖ in accordance with the relevant provisions of the CEA and invites comment on the proposed determination, as well as the factors supporting such a determination. DATES: Written comments must be received on or before [INSERT DATE THAT IS 30 DAYS AFTER PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER], to be assured of consideration. ADDRESSES: Submission of Comments by mail: You may submit comments to: Office of Financial Markets, Department of the Treasury, 1500 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W., Washington, DC, 20220.
    [Show full text]
  • Currency Swaps Basis Swaps Basis Swaps Involve Swapping One Floating Index Rate for Another
    Advanced forms of currency swaps Basis swaps Basis swaps involve swapping one floating index rate for another. Banks may need to use basis swaps to arrange a currency swap for the customers. Example A customer wants to arrange a swap in which he pays fixed dollars and receives fixed sterling. The bank might arrange 3 other separate swap transactions: • an interest rate swap, fixed rate against floating rate, in dollars • an interest rate swap, fixed sterling against floating sterling • a currency basis swap, floating dollars against floating sterling Hedging the Bank’s risk Exposures arise from mismatched principal amounts, currencies and maturities. Hedging methods • If the bank is paying (receiving) a fixed rate on a swap, it could buy (sell) government bonds as a hedge. • If the bank is paying (receiving) a variable, it can hedge by lending (borrowing) in the money markets. When the bank finds a counterparty to transact a matching swap in the opposite direction, it will liquidate its hedge. Multi-legged swaps In a multi-legged swap a bank avoids taking on any currency risk itself by arranging three or more swaps with different clients in order to match currencies and amounts. Example A company wishes to arrange a swap in which it receives floating rate interest on Australian dollars and pays fixed interest on sterling. • a fixed sterling versus floating Australian dollar swap with the company • a floating Australian dollar versus floating dollar swap with counterparty A • a fixed sterling versus dollar swap with counterparty B Amortizing swaps The principal amount is reduced progressively by a series of re- exchanging during the life of the swap to match the amortization schedule of the underlying transaction.
    [Show full text]
  • Foreign Currency Swaps
    RECORD OF SOCIETY OF ACTUARIES 1990 VOL. 16 NO. 2 FOREIGN CURRENCY SWAPS Moderator: RANDALL LEE BOUSHEK Panelists: JOSEPH C. LAU* MICHAEL B. MURDOCH** PATRICIA OWENS** * Recorder: RANDALL LEE BOUSHEK o With the globalization of the capital markets and more active entry of U.S. insurance companies into the international insurance market, this instrument may become more widely used. -- What is it? -- Past uses and results -- Future potential uses MR. RANDALL LEE BOUSHEK: This is the panel discussion on foreign currency swaps. My name is Randy Boushek and I will be the moderator for this session. I am what you might call a nontraditional actuary, involved in asset management at Lutheran Brotherhood, a $7 billion fraternal benefit society headquartered in Minneapolis. Within our operation I am responsible for directing investment in all derivative securities markets, including mortgage-backed securities, asset-backed securities, options, futures, swaps, index-linked notes and other esoteric securities. At Lutheran Brotherhood we, like many in the industry, have for some time been researching the currency swap and nondollar bond markets for investment opportunity. The reasons for this are twofold. First, on the asset side, nondollar denominated debt and equity securities now constitute the first and third largest securities markets in the world and cannot be ignored in the asset allocation decision. Second, on the liability side, the opening of international insurance markets and the potential for growth in nondollar insurance liabilities represents both a significant opportunity and a significant risk for the domestic insurance industry. As evidence of this potential, at present the U.S. consumer accounts for approximately 40% of the premiums collected in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • The Foreign Exchange and Interest Rate Derivatives Markets
    The Foreign Exchange and Interest Rate Derivatives Markets: Turnover in the United States, April 2016 Federal Reserve Bank of New York Turnover in the United States, April 2016 The Foreign Exchange and Interest Rate Derivatives Markets: Turnover in the United States, April 2016 Background The Federal Reserve Bank of New York together with over fifty other central banks conducted a survey of turnover in the over-the-counter (OTC) foreign exchange and interest rate derivatives markets for April 2016. This worldwide, cooperative effort is undertaken every three years and is coordinated by the Bank for International Settlements (BIS). The “triennial survey” is a comprehensive source of information on the size and structure of the OTC foreign exchange and derivatives markets. To measure the OTC markets, the dealers that make markets in foreign exchange and interest rate derivatives reported trading volumes for April 2016 to the central banks in the countries where they are located. The participants reported separately the volume of trading they conduct with each other to permit adjustments for double reporting. The central banks then compiled national aggregates from the dealers’ data and the BIS compiled global totals from the central banks’ national data.1 (See Annex I for a complete description of survey terms and methods.) In 2016, a total of twenty-three dealers in the United States participated in the foreign exchange part of the survey and nineteen in the interest rate derivatives section, slightly changed from 2013, which had twenty-four and eighteen participating institutions respectively. Participating dealers were commercial banks, U.S. offices of foreign banking organizations, and securities brokers/dealers.
    [Show full text]
  • Cross-Currency Swap Market Through the Lens of OTC Derivative
    Bank of Japan Review 2021-E-1 Cross-Currency Swap Market through the Lens of OTC Derivative Transaction Data: Impact of COVID-19 and Subsequent Recovery Financial Markets Department MARUYAMA Rinto, WASHIMI Kazuaki May 2021 Cross-currency swaps are one of the major US dollar funding tools for non-US banks. While their developments have attracted international attention, data for gauging transaction details are limited since these swaps are over-the-counter transactions, not trades on an exchange. This report provides an overview of the Japan’s cross-currency swap market with over-the-counter derivative transaction data collected in Japan. Then it briefly reviews the impact of the COVID-19 crisis on these transactions around the spring of 2020. A data analysis indicates that major banks continued transactions as a market maker by breaking trades into smaller blocks and diversifying the counterparties, while smaller banks who do not actively engage in normal times were found to have participated in trading. Up until now, there has been little available data for Introduction gauging transaction details, since cross-currency swap transactions are over-the-counter (OTC) transactions In recent years, foreign currency funding by banks, rather than on-exchange trades. Previous studies have especially the US dollar funding, has attracted largely relied on the cross-currency basis which international attention as cross-border claims have been represents the dollar funding premium. It has been on an increasing trend. In particular, the spring of 2020, pointed out that more data would be needed to gauge when the market was in turmoil due to the spread of market liquidity and functioning in the cross-currency COVID-19, saw a sharp increase in the dollar funding swap market.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Currency Swaps in the Domestic Banking System and the Functioning of the Swap Market During the Crisis
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Páles, Judit; Kuti, Zsolt; Csávás, Csaba Working Paper The role of currency swaps in the domestic banking system and the functioning of the swap market during the crisis MNB Occasional Papers, No. 90 Provided in Cooperation with: Magyar Nemzeti Bank, The Central Bank of Hungary, Budapest Suggested Citation: Páles, Judit; Kuti, Zsolt; Csávás, Csaba (2011) : The role of currency swaps in the domestic banking system and the functioning of the swap market during the crisis, MNB Occasional Papers, No. 90, Magyar Nemzeti Bank, Budapest This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/83552 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu Judit Páles−Zsolt Kuti −Csaba Csávás The role of currency swaps in the domestic banking system and the functioning of the swap market during the crisis MNB OCCASIONAL PAPERS 90.
    [Show full text]
  • ADB Debt Management Products
    ADB Debt Management Products This brochure presents the Asian Development Bank’s debt management products and explains their main features and purposes. It also provides an overview of basic terms and conditions to help borrowers in making informed decisions when using these products. About the Asian Development Bank ADB is committed to achieving a prosperous, inclusive, resilient, and sustainable Asia and the Pacific, while sustaining its efforts to eradicate extreme poverty. Established in 1966, it is owned by 68 members—49 from the region. Its main instruments ADB Debt Management for helping its developing member countries are policy dialogue, loans, equity investments, guarantees, grants, and technical assistance. Products ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK 6 ADB Avenue, Mandaluyong City 1550 Metro Manila, Philippines www.adb.org ADB Debt Management Products Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 IGO license (CC BY 3.0 IGO) © 2020 Asian Development Bank 6 ADB Avenue, Mandaluyong City, 1550 Metro Manila, Philippines Tel +63 2 8632 4444; Fax +63 2 8636 2444 www.adb.org Some rights reserved. Published in 2020. Publication Stock No. ARM200040-2 The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Asian Development Bank (ADB) or its Board of Governors or the governments they represent. ADB does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this publication and accepts no responsibility for any consequence of their use. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by ADB in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned.
    [Show full text]
  • SWAPS: Definition and Types
    RS: IF-V-4 SWAPS SWAPS: Definition and Types Definition A swap is a contract between two parties to deliver one sum of money against another sum of money at periodic intervals. • Obviously, the sums exchanged should be different: – Different amounts (say, one fixed & the other variable) – Different currencies (say, USD vs EUR) • The two payments are the legs or sides of the swap. - Usually, one leg is fixed and one leg is floating (a market price). • The swap terms specify the duration and frequency of payments. 1 RS: IF-V-4 Example: Two parties (A & B) enter into a swap agreement. The agreement lasts for 3 years. The payments will be made semi-annually. Every six months, A and B will exchange payments. Leg 1: Fixed A B Leg 2: Variable • Swaps can be used to change the profile of cash flows. If a swap is combined with an underlying position, one of the (or both) parties can change the profile of their cash flows (and risk exposure). For example, A can change its cash flows from variable to fixed. Fixed A B Variable Payment Variable • Types Popular swaps: - Interest Rate Swap (one leg floats with market interest rates) - Currency Swap (one leg in one currency, other leg in another) - Equity Swap (one leg floats with market equity returns) - Commodity Swap (one leg floats with market commodity prices) - CDS (one leg is paid if credit event occurs) Most common swap: fixed-for-floating interest rate swap. - Payments are based on hypothetical quantities called notionals. - The fixed rate is called the swap coupon.
    [Show full text]
  • Valuation Adjustments 6 Ntnze
    0 0 ·~rf'J. ·~> ·~Q Q) 8 0 u 0 ~ ~ Q) ~ ·~ ~ t 0 ~ Q) ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ u ~ ·s:t:::: .0 fJl Od 00 b ...... 0 ~ W,o c:: 0 0 co 0 ~ :iQ 0 :::. ·~ @ Ql ~ ~ .;:: ~ $: ~ ~ ~ ~ .D ~ ro Cl) > ~ ~ LBEX-WGM 002234 CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED BY LEHMAN BROTHERS HOLDINGS, INC. t""'('l rn~ ~~ ~ti ~~ t:l:i>-l ~> Contents >-lt""" :::r:...., I [/).>~G; :::r:...., 1. Executive Summary 3-5 0~ t""'tn z....,oz @G; "!0 JL Valuation Adjustments 6 ntnze . [/)....., Significant Changes 7 0 Summary 8 ~ Regional Matrix 9 Americas 10- 11 Europe 12-13 Asia 14-15 Monthly Changes 16-17 UL Pricing Report 18 r Explanation of Significant Variances 19-23 m m >< Coverage 24-25 Projects 26-28 :s:~ 0 0 1\.) 1\.) (.,) 0'1 LEHlvfAN BROTHERS 2 t""'('l rn~ ~~ ~ti ~~ t:l:i>-l ~> Executive summary >-lt""" :::r:...., Complex Derivatives Transaction Review Committee [/).>~G; :::r:...., This committee, consisting of Capital Market Finance, Accounting Policy and Model Validation personnel, was set up in April 2005 and meets to 0~ t""'tn consider any significant derivative transactions undertaken. The committee considers whether the transactions are being booked, valued and z....,oz modeled appropriately. Furthermore, the committee determines whether the proper accounting treatment is being applied. During the month, the @G; following transactions were reviewed: "!0 ntnze . [/)....., -----+Emerging Market Loan with FX Call Spread- Lehman loaned ¥6 billion to Astana, a Kazakhstan quasi-sovereign entity. In addition, Lehman entered into a currency swap with Astana to convert the JPY loan into USD. Lehman also purchased a FX call spread from 0 Astana.
    [Show full text]