J:\Jobs\113031\_Stage4\ArcGIS\ArcMap\Interim_FS\Main_Report\Final_190716\Figure01_Studyarea_catchment.mxd H A W M

a K c R d E o E S n G a B l d U I

O R R i v N e Y A

r - N L

E

F P F

P u I L

N

t t E

O y

A

A R W iver O Colo R L

J o N i

D a U s R

d e V

L m E S Y A H a P T

n L e 2 U O s i L C g 0

F D h o E R 1 e t l o Y Y s P T r 9 r o ! y L H r t

o a S l ! w a w 4 k p n

e e R e

d s r n 5 iv b F e u c L ! N r r r e

6 y i e t r o h e r W Y g m 3

t ! B h 2 a o i a r l

r

w B b o e R n lls L r a o e C

i i ne s c 7 m o r ! k f

R a f h o R

a l d o t u y W m e t r n n a 1 8 a c o i i d n c e n

i ! h d !

d B

s ! 9 r ! o 1

i ! r d 3 g

! 1 e 1 1 4 Grose ! K River 1 a 2 C t

o o

x o 1

s m M 0 P

R

b 4 S

e i o a v M n

P u

e o r t a

r ! t i o t h r h

W r

r w C a

1 a a r

! m

y e

5 r e r

a a k W t S g t a y a a l d m l a

! n c b e i a y a

D !

!1 a 6 m L a

k ! B B e e a

B 1 n s 7 u i t

n s

K r

o r

w a !

m g

u o N

n r e

g a p

R n e

i a v g

e n r R iv

e

r O

l d

H

u

m

H e

u

H

m

i

g

e

h

M w

a o

y t

L o

r C i w

t a

N t a t l y a a e r t R a t c

a i A v t

i R v

R e o i r C v

i n e

v o r

e r W R d

r e

o i v a

u l

e x l o

r R i n v g e r o P n g a

B B ! c u o

r i w 0 k f

e i r c

a R l

i O ! v e

r c e 1 a 0

n

W

o

2 l l

o

n

0 d

i

l l

y

R

i

v e r G o u l b u r n

! 4 0 N o w H r a A ! W K

E

M u

S

l w

B

a r U

6 e

0 e R

C R M K

R Y e

a i i a

v v y t

- j e e c o N

r r L h r s E

o m R C c P e o a A E n a t i t d T o A

B s n C F N o s I H G

u R M n U 8 I d 0 V R E K a E E N m r y

R T ´ 1 J:\Jobs\113031\_Stage4\ArcGIS\ArcMap\Interim_FS\Main_Report\Final_190716\Figure02_Studyarea_floodplain_area_261018.mxd D a r g

P C l e u W o

t

t l

y o i s

e H R m

e o

i a a g d n h s t

s F

! e r r L y o 4 w ! H e A r W

P o K r M R E t l P a E S e S o 5 n L r G r B d a o t r l a w U i I c S t n ! O e !

L k R d p r F S e N v L C e 6 Y a e o i l a ! n A i G l t - d f r l c t s N c g o e m L u e 3

e n k V

n E r F F v a d P I l ! L i e N e l E O l r e m A 2 A O

L a J F N

n D U R e

V

L r E ! S S r Y A E y P T a r

L r 2 c U O i n L 7 P k ! 0 g D o E R v 1 h r i F t i Y Y T l 9 B l r

Be e

l e ls N !

Line W

o R r f E o e

o 8 o

a b i m d o l r e b C t k 1 a n h e l a n y e

r t R f s n z t o a i e

c R r i

r ! c h e ! e m

a ! Y C c o a ! a h 9 r n t W G r t d R F a ! ! a P r r i m e i o n e R 1

! i a C t e n 3 d u i c t c m N

r o s h n h T e o a o s m d o e r n

r t i w o P k h s

1 B n 1 o ! n d r i W i n

d 1

t P i

4 g n a

d e c

s i

1 f

o i

! 2 c

C r H

a

i

s g t h

l

e ! w

R

r a

e y

i P

c a a

g c k

i

h f a i c b 1

y M 0

s o

!

S t

C o

o r

r w e

u a e t

h y

G k r e at C

W r e

e e

s k t e ! r n P

H e

ig n 1

h r 5 w i t

a h y P ! e n r i t h P a r r a m a t t a

! W J S N u y a W e n d p l c l a e t a n i r o a c e r n n i a y a g ! a ! m 1 b 6 W a

a T

l D h l

a e a c N i m a o r t ! h e r n R o B a d e n 1 7 t s

B a s i n

! 0 2 .

5 O

5

l

d

H

u

m

e

H

i

g

h

w

a y 1 0 C F M G K l e a a a o y t u j o c o

g d L h r i

p o m n R l c g a 1 e o a

i 5 n a S n t S i t d

o t

E a T B s n t x U s

o

i H o t

u e u D n

F n m n s Y

I

d t

e

G

a M

(

A

P

o U

r 2 t

y o

M R

R 0 r k w

E F a E m y )

A ´ 2

!

!

!

! J:\Jobs\113031\_Stage3\Excel\Stochastic_Drawdown_Averages.xlsx 2500000

Full Supply Level 2000000

1500000 Storage(m³)

1000000 WARRAGAMBADAM

500000 In accordance with standard practice, the dam is assumed to be full at the PMF and for events above the 1 in 10 000 AEP. FULLSUPPLY LEVEL

Warragamba Dam would be below full supply level at

commencement of storms in 11% of modelled 1 in 100 DISTRIBUTION

AEP events DRAWDOWN

0 FIGURE 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Probability (Percent)

1 in 100 AEP 1 in 50 AEP 1 in 20 AEP 1 in 10 AEP 1 in 5 AEP 3 J:\Jobs\113031\_Stage4\Excel\Interim_FS\Figure03_04_PreDamFloodLevels_CumulativeRankedInflows.xlsx 2500000

2000000 Full Supply Level

1500000

)

3 PRE

Storage(m 1000000

-

EVENTWARRAGAMABA DAMLEVELS CUMULATIVERANKEDINFLOWS

500000

Hydroelectric Power Scheme Present. Storage in Previous Month For Rank N Inflow Event (2000 sets of 100 Year Simulations). 0

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 4 FIGURE Probability (Percent)

Rank 1 Rank 1 to 2 Rank 1 to 5 Rank 1 to 10 Rank 1 to 20 All Data Top 10 Historical Floods 1962-2012 (~Rank1-20) J:\Jobs\113031\FFA\Processed Data\Flike_FFA_results_all_2 100000 Estimated Discharges (year)

Expected Probability

90% Confidence limit

10000 1867 1864

1900

/s) 3

1000

Peak Discharge (m DischargePeak FLOOD FLOOD FREQUENCYANALYSIS 100

Q 1% AEP = 12400 m3/s LP3 analysis - Bayesian

Gauged record: 1909 - 2012 WARRAGAMBA Included 1864, 1867 and 1900 events, 43 years below 500 m3/s

Ungauged record:1791 - 1908, 115 years below 14600 m3/s FIGURE 5 FIGURE 10 2 5 10 20 50 100 200 500

1 in X AEP J:\Jobs\113031\FFA\Processed Data\Flike_FFA_results_all_2 100000 Estimated Discharges (year) Expected Probability 90% Confidence limit

1867 10000 1961

1964 1978

/s) 3

1000

PeakDischarge(m FLOOD FLOOD FREQUENCYANALYSIS

100

Q 1% AEP = 15600 m3/s LP3 analysis - Bayesian Gauged record: 1893 - 2012 Included 1867 event, 26 years below 322 m3/s 3

Ungauged record: 1791 - 1892, 102 years below 20000 m /s PENRITH FIGURE 6 FIGURE 10 2 5 10 20 50 100 200 500

1 in X AEP J:\Jobs\113031\FFA\Processed Data\Flike_FFA_results_all_2 100000 Estimated Discharges (year) Expected Probability 90% Confidence limit

1867 10000

1978 1961

/s) 3

1000

Peak Discharge (m Discharge Peak FLOOD FREQUENCYANALYSIS

100

Q 1% AEP = 11100 m3/s LP3 analysis - Bayesian Gauged record: 1855 - 2012, 97 years below 2020 m3/s 3

Ungauged record: 1791 - 1854, 64 years below 14700 m /s WINDSOR FIGURE 7 FIGURE 10 2 5 10 20 50 100 200 500

1 in X AEP HAWKESBURY-NEPEAN VALLEY FIGURE 8 REGIONAL FLOOD STUDY HYDROLOGIC MODEL LAYOUT FINAL REPORT RORB JULY 2019

B121 Brooklyn Sydney B118 Spencer Pa B120 M cif B119 oto ic rw ay B117 Pacific Ocean ry u b s e r k e B116 w iv Parramatta M115 a R H B77 Wisemans Ferry B76 M111 B101 M114 Cattai B104 B78 S74 M112 B75 W52 M107 M110 Lower Portland B100 River S73 Macdonald B103 Windsor W46 M113 S72 S71 W53 M108 B70 O B102 e n H ld M106 M109 N h er W54 W47 epean T h H um W51 River rt d ig o a h e North Richmond N o w W44 Colo R ay W48 rke U99 P62 W57 W56 W45 Bu Putty Road B69 B63 iver Heights W43 R U98 t W42 U92 ea W55 Nowra M105 e r n G68 G r P60 P40 n te i d y es a W50 L a w W Warragamba W49 o h s g l G67 i l R H

r P61

e f Dam R39 W41 e o

v U93 B U91 i G65

R e R38 ittl R21 o L r l P59 R22 ive J11 U90 U89 o U97 G66 R

C P58 Lake C18 Bowral d Burragorang x Na U96 ttai C19 m C20

. R23 U85 River m U88

n U95 b U94 G64 R36 w U84 _

l R37 e Katoomba R28 d J12 o m U87 R17 J13 _ U83 c i U81 K33 g ´

o J16 l o Coxs r F27 d U86 K30 K31 K32 K35 y River J6

H U80 _ W 8 Lithgow J10 0 RORB F26 o e J7 l r l K34 o u U82 n g Subcatchments i K29 d

F i

\ l U79 l

6 J15 y

1 Brooklyn R 7 i

0 v

9 J9 e r 1 Causeway F24 F25 _ l a n i Cedar Ford J14 F \

t J5 r o p Burralow e R _

n Jooriland i J8 a M \ Kelpie Point S

F J4 _ Goulburn m St Albans i r J3 e t J2 n I

\ Penrith p a

M Residual Area c r A \ J1 S South Creek I G c r Upper A \ 4

e Colo/Morans g a t Rock S _ \ 1

3 Wallacia 0 3 1 1 \

s 0 10 20 40 60 80 b o

J Km \ : J HAWKESBURY-NEPEAN VALLEY FIGURE 9 REGIONAL FLOOD STUDY HYDRAULIC MODEL LAYOUT FINAL REPORT RUBICON JULY 2019 26 ID BOUNDARY AND INFLOW DESCRIPTION 1 Nepean Inflow 2 Warragamba Dam Inflow Pacific Ocean 3 DS Warragamba Dam 4 Erskine Creek Inflow 5 Mulgoa Creek Inflow 6 Glenbrook Creek Inflow 7 Penrith Lakes 8 Grose River Inflow 9 Hawksebury River at Redbank Creek Brooklyn Sydney 25 10 Rickabys Creek Inflow 11 South Creek Upstream 12 Eastern Creek Inflow 23 Spencer 13 South Creek Downstream 14 Wilberforce 24 P ac ifi 15 Cattai Creek Inflow c H ig 16 Little Cattai Creek Inflow hw ay 17 Howes Creek Inflow 18 Colo River Inflow 19 Gorge Local Flows 22 20 Webbs Creek Inflow r e iv 21 Macdonald River Inflow R ry Parramatta u 22 Downstream of Wisemans Ferry b s e k 23 Mangrove Creek Inflow w a H 24 Berowra Creek Inflow d x 25 Mooney Mooney Creek Inflow m .

N Wisemans 26 Ocean Boundary

O Ferry C

I 21 B U

R 20 _ t u o Cattai y 16

a 19 l 15 _ l e d o m _ c i 12 l u Lower a r

d Portland y 14 h Wilberforce _

9 13 0 e r u r 17 g

i e v F i

\ 18 R 6 Freemans

1 o l 7 o Reach 0 C 11 9 1

_ O l 10 H a H ld u n m i i d g H e F a 9 h u \ M t o w m r o R a t o e e o Th y p y rn r t North Richmond e w e t Penrith rth a u o y R N ad _ P Ro n i Colo Heights a Yarramundi Bridge M \ r

S e 8 Riv F pean Bents _ e 6 Wallacia N m Basin i 7 5 1 r e t n 4 I

\ d

p a

a t o ea R r n M 2 r f G e c t 3

r y o s e a ´

A W w \ e gh n i S i H Warragamba I L G Dam c s l r RUBICON Boundaries and Inflows l

A e \ B 4

e Cross Sections g a t

S RUBICON Layout _ \ 1

3 Catchment Boundary 0 3 1 1 \ s 0 2.5 5 10 15 20 25 b o

J Km \ : J J:\Jobs\113031\_Stage4\MonteCarlo\crude\ror_file_creation\mc_inputs\data\spatial_pattern\Figure10_Spatial_Distribution_plot.xlsx 0.8 This plot shows the proportion of rainfall produced in each portion of the catchment, resulting from 0.7 variation of the spatial pattern.

0.6

0.5

0.4

0.3

SPATIAL SubArea TotalCatchment to Rainfall Ratio

0.2 PATTERNDISTRIBUTION

0.1

0.0 10 FIGURE Warragamba Catchment Nepean Catchment Grose/South Creek Catchments Colo Catchment Sub -Area Mean Example Spatial Pattern J:\Jobs\113031\_Stage2\ModellingFramework\mc_inputs\data\temporal_pattern\temporal_pattern_plot.xlsx 350 This plot shows the 17 three day temporal patterns from the Extreme Storm Database. These are sampled randomly and applied to all AEPs. 300

250

200

150 Cumulative Rainfall (mm)

100

50 TEMPORAL PATTERNS

0 FIGURE 11 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Time (%) Temporal pattern (three day) J:\Jobs\113031\_Stage4\Excel\Interim_FS\Figure12_ARF.xlsx 1.10 ARR 1987 24 Hour 50% AEP 24 Hours ARR 1987 did not provide ARFs for larger catchment 1% AEP 24 Hour areas > 1000km2. 1.05 50% AEP 72 Hour The ARFs provided in ARR 1987 were independent of 1% AEP 72 Hour AEP. New ARFs are only AEP dependent from Hawkesbury Nepean Catchment Area To Penrith durations greater than 18 hours. 1.00

0.95

0.90

0.85 ARF

0.80

0.75 AREALREDUCTIONFACTOR

0.70

0.65 FIGURE

0.60

30 300 3000 30000 12 Area (km2) FIGURE 13A LOSSES DISTRIBUTIONS INITIAL LOSS 100

90

80

70

60

50 Standardised Initial Loss (mm)LossInitialStandardised 40

30

20

Figure13AB_calibrated_loss_distribution.xlsx \

10

Interim_FS

\

Excel

\

_Stage4 \ 0

113031 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 \

Exceedance Percentile

Jobs

\ J: FIGURE 13B LOSSES DISTRIBUTIONS PREBURST TO BURST RATIO 1.2

1

0.8

0.6

burst to Burst Ratio to Burst burst

- Pre

0.4

0.2

Figure13AB_calibrated_loss_distribution.xlsx

\

Interim_FS

\

Excel

\

_Stage4 \ 0

113031 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 \

Exceedence Percentile

Jobs

\ J: J:\Jobs\113031\_Stage2\Timing\timing_distribution.xlsx 50

40

30

20

10

0

Difference in time to 50% (mm) to rainfalltime50% Differencein -10 TRIBUTARY

-20 TIMING

-30

DISTRIBUTION FIGURE 14 FIGURE -40 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 Exceedence Percentile Warragamba to Nepean Warragamba to Grose Warragamba to Colo J:\Jobs\113031\_Stage4\ArcGIS\ArcMap\Interim_FS\Main_Report\Final_190716\Figure15_Flood_Extents_FloodplainArea.mxd C P

u W o

t l t o y i s

e H R m

e o

i a a g d n h s t

s F

! e r r L y o w ! H e A r W

P o K P r R E t a l c a E S i n f i G B c d

M U I S ! ! O o L R p t e N o e Y e r

! n w A G t - c s N a L u e

y V

n E r F F a d P I l ! L e N e E O r m A A O L a J N

n D U R

V

L E ! S S Y A P T a

L 2 c U O L k ! 0 D E R v 1 i F Y Y T l 9 B l Be r lls Line R e e o N ! f W r o E o a e o

d b i m o l r e b C t k a n h e l a n y e

r t R f s n z t o a i e

c R r i

r ! c h e ! e m

a ! Y C c o a ! a h r n t W r t d a ! ! a P i m i n

! i C t d u t

r s n T e o d o e r i w k

B

! n r

i

d P

g a

e c

i f

i

! c

H

i

g

h

! w

R a

y

i P

c a

k c

i

a f i c b

y M

s o

!

S t

C o

o r

r w e

u a e t

G h y r k e at C W r e e e s

t k e

r ! n P H e i g n h r

w i t

a h y ! P a r r a m a t t a

! W S y a W d l l a a n r c e r i a y a g ! a ! m b

a T

D h e

a N m o r t ! h e r n R o

B a d e n t s

B a s f T d F u A i T m F c r N m l e a o i o s h l h l n o n o e o g t o e p e e e y t c o t o i e d d l s o h

h e d d N m f

! s

n o l m m b n f

o : e o a m d b a

e o o T e e p r l s e p

h t a d h n n f e

h a p a l i a p i e t t o n a n a n e

a v n p o f c

n g v y d l m i t d i o o o d i

n i

o o R

i a f u o r i n a g t l 0 n n u p s e o r i d p f

v

g r s o o o c o i o p i

e n

n e r r h v i d i f n e a m r n g

s

e n

t p d f t i F s

c h r o o n e a o o

l m l e f r l 2 u f P

t o r o t l m o t i

e o

o d h e . o e g l a r o o 5 n n i a e n m d n y r n c d t e

t

t .

r i g w i l a a S a i

F a o a ( t i

t l n h o l i b t n t

i t

l u s e o o f h f

t o a

l o L h

h

d i s n v o i O s c 5 n r o a e t o y e

o

m k

e

l k r s

w i r d d t d n

w m

l x h P 1 1 U R A - P C e u H a

t a

n f

h c

a m e s b u r a t

n r M r e E . p i a a i m l a i i

t

j o v e u e y

d n n e i e i b

n s n e s t s t x

n

d

e

i F f r c a a c

H p t

g

f

t e r

e

r i f 1 5 t i

l t

g n r e n r r r h o l u a i

e h s o e r t o

t e o w k 0

f

d o c t

o F h m

f A a o v p i n s y e t f t a i t o 0 d

c h

i d u r o l

c c d E n t i o L e o e P m a

e n

r h t A e e

e f s t s a n o

n P g m a

e i 1

i x e

r

v , m E m . k t d n o

o E i t n e n 0 e v b

e g f e p B

P o t a e t

u r x n S s e o e t a r i s s r h t o t t

t e n s

c s u H e t h a e d

l A u u t ) r d o y s

o s n a

e P n d

w C e

r

r e w a t s a o

F e e t d y s s i s . a

k i f t o n r t

h t a

L

a e i r n c e y t r - l f o e e h

i s l F o s r

O t

i ( u a P r d e h m b y C u t a e

L t m

u l i

O M a f L a t n p 1 o d f l r

O s o n a t e o y c e p 5 e u

D F o a k - l f s r t u

r O N a n d e l c

n h

y o d P t M i h

s e c e o l o s m e D e x

a p w u i L i S

s d l a i o n e l

l

n m H o

c d

A N d g d p a o F E i

c h o u n e e a n f n p a

a

I e e m v I t X l

t

o G N e l l m a e a i t m p i

n

e t e n

n s T ,

U M e

e a

b

g g t

d

A i

. o E o i e

a g

R n

2

t n o a

R s n N

0

r E t t k

l w i

r y

o E a T m e

) y 1 n a A S . 5 m

´

!

!

!

! HAWKESBURY-NEPEAN VALLEY FIGURE 16 C r FLOOD EXTENTS REGIONAL FLOOD STUDYS e p e r k RICHMOND-WINDSOR FINAL REPORT in k R s i JULY 2019 d R g d e

R d

d R Kurmond Rd e

c

r

o

f

r

e

b l i

d W R e c a rr n e L T d e k o ro C

S lo p e s R d

K u r ra jo n g R d d i R ta at PITT TOWN C

NORTH RICHMOND d x m . r o s d n i W _ s t

n RICHMOND e t x E _ d Windsor Bridge o Richmond AFB o L l en F no _ x Ha 6 St wkes 1 bury e V r alley u Wa d g y R i yville F he \ W Sc

6 i

1 n d d 7 R WINDSOR s

0 h o 9 g B r 1 a R d la _ e d R l r e c n a tl k w n s t o i a o T F C w Windsor Railway Station tt \ i t n t P r S o R e p i d r e a

R u q _ c n i a MCGRATHS HILL a M d M \ R

S

y

F r

r _

e m i d r

n e t o n d I \

n p

o a

L M c r A \ S

I Notes: The mapped flood information represents Hawkesbury-Nepean ´ G

c mainstream regional flooding including backwater effects, but does not include r

A local catchment flooding or local overland flooding.

\ Flood Extent 4 e g Flood behaviour information is subject to change as a result of new data, 1 in 5 AEP a t

S methods and technology. 1 in 100 AEP _ \

1 BLIGH PARK 3 The mapped flood information excludes the impacts of climate change and PMF 0 3

1 implementation of potential flood mitigation measures. 1 \ s 0 0.5 1 2 3 4 b Any flooding information within the banks of rivers or streams should not be o

J km \

: used for any assessment (other than flood extents) without detailed investigation. J HAWKESBURY-NEPEAN VALLEY FIGURE 17 REGIONAL FLOOD STUDY FLOOD EXTENTS FINAL REPORT PENRITH LAKES PENRITH JULY 2019 Notes: The mapped flood information represents Hawkesbury-Nepean mainstream regional flooding including backwater effects, but does not include local catchment flooding or local overland flooding.

Flood behaviour information is subject to change as a result of new data, methods and technology.

A The mapped flood information excludes the impacts of climate change and ndrews Rd implementation of potential flood mitigation measures.

Any flooding information within the banks of rivers or streams should not be

d used for any assessment (otd her than flood extents) without detailed investigation.

R

R

h

d g Flood mapping over Penrith Lakes is indicative only as the flood modelling n

a

o e does not incorporate the latest infrastructure of the Penrith Lakes Scheme. r m

e l h

t c s The Nepean River Flood Si tudy may provide more detailed analysis a R

C of flood behaviour in the area shown.

Dunh eved Rd

Victoria Bridge

PENRITH wy estern H Great W d x m .

h d t i G r EMU PLAINS R re at n W a es e ter o n H P g wy

_ l

s u t

n M e t x e

E v

_ A d h c J o am n ison o Rd l e T F

_ Jamison Park 7 1 e r u g i F \ 6 1 7

0 GLENBROOK 9 1 _ l a n i F \ t r o p e Maxw R ell St _ n i a M \ S F

_ ´ m i r e t n I

\ Penrith Lakes Area (approximate only) p a - refer to note M c r Area of Penrith City Council Nepean A \ M4 M S O I T River Flood Study - refer to note ORW G AY c r Flood Extent A \ 4 e 1 in 5 AEP g a t d

S 1 in 100 AEP R _ \ n 1 r

3 PMF e 0 Penrith Golf Course h 3 t r 1

1 o \

s N 0 0.5 1 2 3 b e o

J h km \

: T J HAWKESBURY-NEPEAN VALLEY FIGURE 18 REGIONAL FLOOD STUDY FLOOD EXTENTS FINAL REPORT WALLACIA JULY 2019 Notes: The mapped flood information represents Hawkesbury-Nepean mainstream regional flooding including backwater effects, but does not include local catchment flooding or local overland flooding. Wallacia Weir Flood behaviour information is subject to change as a result of new data, d methods and technology. R

a o The mapped flood information excludes the impacts of climate change and g l u implementation of potential flood mitigation measures. M Elizabeth Dr Any flooding information within the banks of rivers or streams should not be WALLACIA used for any assessment (other than flood extents) without detailed investigation.

Flooding at Wallacia is complex due to the joint probabilty of flooding from the Nepean and Warragamba Rivers. This study uses a simplified hydrologic approach and the mapping is based on a 1d hydraulic model.

P D ark Rd A

O

R

N

R

E

H

T

R

O

N

E

H

T

Warragamba Dam d x m . a i c a l l a W

_ WARRAGAMBA s t n e t x E _ d o o l

F d

_ R

8

1 e l e a r

u d r g i e

F v \ l i 6

1 S 7 0 9 1

_ SILVERDALE l a n i F \ t r o p e R _ n i a M \ S F _ m i r e t n I \ p a GREENDALE M c r ´ A \ S I

G Upstream extent of flood mapping c r A

\ Flood Extent 4 e g 1 in 5 AEP a t

S 1 in 100 AEP _ \ 1

3 PMF 0 3 1 1 \

s 0 0.5 1 2 3 b o

J km \ : J J:\Jobs\113031\_Stage4\ArcGIS\ArcMap\Interim_FS\Main_Report\Final_190716\Figure19_FloodDepths_0005yAEP_FloodplainArea.mxd

P C

u W o

t

t l

y o i s

e H R m

e o

i a a g d n h s t

s F

! e r r L y o w ! H e A r W

P o K r R E t l a E S n G B d U I S ! ! O L R p e N e Y e

! n A G t - c s N L u e

V

n E r F F a d P I l ! L e N e E O r m A A O L a J N

n D U R

V

L E ! S S Y A P T a

L 2 c U O L k ! 0 D E R v 1 i F Y Y T l 9 B l r

B e

e e ell Lin N ! s o W o r f R a E o d e o b i m o l r e b C t k a n h e l a n y e

r t R f s n z t o a i e

c R r i

r ! c h e ! e m

a ! Y C c o a ! a h r n t W r t d a ! ! a P i m i n

! i C t d u t

r s n T e o d o e r i w k

B

! n r i

d

P

g

a

e

c

i

f

i

! c

H

i g

h

! w

R

a

y

i P

c a

k c

i

f

a i c b y

M s

o

! S C t

o o

r r w

e

u a e

t y h G e k r

a C t

W r

e e

e s

k t

! er n P

H e

ig n

h r

w i t

a h y ! P a r r a m a t t a

! W S y a W d l l a a n r c e r i a y a g ! a ! m b a

T D he a N m o r t ! h

e rn R o

B a d e n t s

B a s d F l F u A i T m F c r N o m e i a o s l l h l n o n c o o e o g t e p e e y a t c o o t o i e d l s o h

t h e d d d m ! f i s

n o l o m m n f

o : o a m d d b a n

o o T e e r l e s e p ,

t a d D

h n n f

p h a p t l i a p i h e t t o n n t a n e e

a n p h e o f c

g v y d l m t d i s p

o o d i n i

f o o

i a f l o r i n a g a t t 0 l o n n u p s e o h d p f

r > 1 5 2 1 0 U F P C o

g r s o o o c e o i o p

d n 0 .

e

l r r h e v i d p a ( i f - 5 - - n e o 1 a m i n g s

e n n m

l n p d s t f t i e - o s

5 c 1 2 1 r o o d n e a c o - o

r t l m v f 2 r l d ) 1 0 . u i f P

t r h r i o t l c m o e t i 5 5 t

e o e o d h e .

e 5 a g l h m r l o 5 o n e

n i a e n m a n t y n s

c d i t

t

x t . r v L h i e m g w i l a a a i

o a e ( t t i o

a n t l n h o l i e b n t

i t

u e o o o f h f

t k E t a

l n o L h

l

i s

n v o O n i d s e 5 c n B r a e t x t e

o

l

m k

l y e

s s d k b r s

i r t d t o

n w .

l x h H e u e e

a

t a

f

T A o h u c a m e u s b

r t n n o

m c a i l a t

n j n

o u r

d e i e i b o t e n s

s t e d n d

l

i d

H r c a m t y

g o

f

i g e e

r a i f l t

h n e a n r

o l u a

w p f t

s o e t

k

s f e a d

o c t

o r f a

( o p i F y s e r t y h i t o d

a c r h d u m r

c c e n l i o e o a e p n

r o h t d e

i e f s t s

n g m w a

p o 1 i i x

e

r v , m e . t n o

i t r o e 0 n d e v b n

e g f o p t

a e t

u

n

h a s o e t a M x s r i h t e t

n n s

c s u H s i a e d

m l t a )

u d r o y s

o s a

t e P

r w e

r p h

e w a a v s a o

F e p s s i p i s e .

k f t t s n t r t

h L

e y h e i r n c e t r

n 1 o e h e i

s l

o s a O t o i u a o e d g h m b

u t F r f

t m I

u n

l O i

e f g L a N t f n 1 d l L r

l s l o r o a t a o y c e y 5 e o D

o k - o O l f s t ) u

5 u

N a d e c d n h

d P n i

- h

s O e i e o l m A n e d

e

a p w u L r S g

d D o n e e l l l

E H o

e c d

A d g d a F a i f c h

v n u e P e e a n t n a I

D e e

I v m l

a t G

o

r N

l l l m a e a m

e i

.

t

n E E

n s p , t

U M e

a b g o

t d a A

P i V

. o i e

g R

n 2

r

n t o t

a

R s T E

i 0 r c E w t k t o

i

r u H E

a o N m e

t y l 1 e n a a A S T . r 9 m

´

!

!

!

! HAWKESBURY-NEPEAN VALLEY FIGURE 20 C r FLOOD DEPTHS REGIONAL FLOOD STUDYS e p e r k 1 IN 5 AEP EVENT FINAL REPORT in k R s i JULY 2019 d RICHMOND-WINDSOR R g d e

R d

d R Kurmond Rd e

c

r

o

f

r

e

b l i

d W R e c a rr n e L T d e k o ro C

S lo p e s R d

K u r ra jo n g R d d i R ta at PITT TOWN C d x NORTH RICHMOND m . r o s d n i W _ P E A y 5 0 0 0 _

s RICHMOND h t p e D d Windsor Bridge o Richmond AFB o L l en F no _ x Ha 0 St wkes 2 bury e V r alley u Wa d g y R i yville F he \ W Sc

6 i

1 n d WINDSOR d 7 R s

0 h o 9 g B r 1 a R d la _ e d R l r e c n a tl k w n s t o i a o T F C w Windsor Railway Station tt \ i t n t P r S o R e p i d r e a

R u q _ c n i a MCGRATHS HILL a M d M \ R

S

y

F r

r _

e m i d r

n e

t ´ o n d I \

n p

o a Depth (m) L M c r Notes: The mapped flood information represents Hawkesbury-Nepean 0 - 1 A \ mainstream regional flooding including backwater effects, but does not include S I local catchment flooding or local overland flooding. 1 - 2.5 G c r

A 2.5 - 5 \ Flood behaviour information is subject to change as a result of new data, 4 e methods and technology. 5 - 10 g a t

S The mapped flood information excludes the impacts of climate change and 10 - 15 _ \

1 implementation of potential flood mitigation measures. BLIGH PARK 3 > 15 0 3

1 Any flooding information within the banks of rivers or streams should not be 1 \ s used for any assessment (other than flood extents) without detailed investigation. 0 0.5 1 2 3 4 b o Flood depths are indicative only. To determine the depth of flooding at a particular

J km \ : location, the flood level should be compared to a surveyed ground level. J HAWKESBURY-NEPEAN VALLEY FIGURE 21 REGIONAL FLOOD STUDY FLOOD DEPTHS FINAL REPORT PENRITH LAKES 1 IN 5 AEP EVENT JULY 2019 PENRITH Notes: The mapped flood information represents Hawkesbury-Nepean mainstream regional flooding including backwater effects, but does not include local catchment flooding or local overland flooding.

Flood behaviour information is subject to change as a result of new data, A methods and technology. ndrews Rd The mapped flood information excludes the impacts of climate change and implementation of potential flood mitigation measures.

d

d

R Any flooding information within the banks of rivers or streams should not be R

h used for any assessment (od ther than flood extents) without detailed investigation. g

n a Flood depths are indicative only. To determine the depth of flooding at a particular o

e

r location, the flood level shom uld be compared to a surveyed ground level. e l h

t c

s i

a Flood mapping over PenritRh Lakes is indicative only as the flood modelling C does not incorporate the latest infrastructure of the Penrith Lakes Scheme.

Dunh eved Rd

Victoria Bridge d x m

. PENRITH h t i r ern Hwy n at West e Gre P _ P

E d

A G EMU PLAINS R re

y a t W

5 e a ste

0 r o n H 0 g w l y 0 u _ s M h t p e e v

D A d h c J o am n ison o Rd l e T F

_ Jamison Park 1 2 e r u g i F \ 6 1 7

0 GLENBROOK 9 1 _ l a n i F \ t r o p e Maxw R ell St _ n i a M \ S F

_ ´ m i r e t

n Penrith Lakes Area (approximate only) - refer to note I \ p a Depth (m) M c r 0 - 1 A \ M4 M S O I T ORW 1 - 2.5 G AY c r 2.5 - 5 A \ 4 e 5 - 10 g a t d

S 10 - 15 R _ \ n 1 r > 15 3 e 0 Penrith Golf Course h 3 t r 1

1 o \

s N 0 0.5 1 2 3 b e o

J h km \

: T J HAWKESBURY-NEPEAN VALLEY FIGURE 22 REGIONAL FLOOD STUDY FLOOD DEPTHS FINAL REPORT 1 IN 5 AEP EVENT JULY 2019 WALLACIA

Wallacia Weir

d

R

a o g l u M Elizabeth Dr WALLACIA

P D ark Rd A

O

R

N

R

E

H

T

R

O

N

E

H

T

Warragamba Dam d x m . a i c a l l a W _ P E A y 5 0 0

0 WARRAGAMBA _ s h t p e D d o o l

F d

_ R

2

2 e l e a r

u d r g i e

F v \ l i 6

1 S 7 0 9 1

_ SILVERDALE l a n i F \ t r o p e R _ n i a M \ S F

_ ´ m i r Notes: The mapped flood information represents Hawkesbury-Nepean e t

n mainstream regional flooding including backwater effects, but does not include

I Upstream extent of flood mapping \

p local catchment flooding or local overland flooding. a GREENDALE Depth (m) M c r Flood behaviour information is subject to change as a result of new data, 0 - 1 A \ methods and technology. S I 1 - 2.5 G c r The mapped flood information excludes the impacts of climate change and 2.5 - 5 A \ implementation of potential flood mitigation measures. 4

e 5 - 10 g a t Any flooding information within the banks of rivers or streams should not be 10 - 15 S used for any assessment (other than flood extents) without detailed investigation. _ \

1 Flood depths are indicative only. To determine the depth of flooding at a particular > 15 3

0 location, the flood level should be compared to a surveyed ground level. 3 1 1 \ s Flooding at Wallacia is complex due to the joint probabilty of flooding 0 0.5 1 2 3 b o from the Nepean and Warragamba Rivers. This study uses a simplified

J km \ : hydrologic approach and the mapping is based on a 1d hydraulic model. J