Trout Waters Recreational Fishing Guide (Central)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Murrumbidgee Regional Fact Sheet
Murrumbidgee region Overview The Murrumbidgee region is home The river and national parks provide to about 550,000 people and covers ideal spots for swimming, fishing, 84,000 km2 – 8% of the Murray– bushwalking, camping and bird Darling Basin. watching. Dryland cropping, grazing and The Murrumbidgee River provides irrigated agriculture are important a critical water supply to several industries, with 42% of NSW grapes regional centres and towns including and 50% of Australia’s rice grown in Canberra, Gundagai, Wagga Wagga, the region. Narrandera, Leeton, Griffith, Hay and Balranald. The region’s villages Chicken production employs such as Goolgowi, Merriwagga and 350 people in the area, aquaculture Carrathool use aquifers and deep allows the production of Murray bores as their potable supply. cod and cotton has also been grown since 2010. Image: Murrumbidgee River at Wagga Wagga, NSW Carnarvon N.P. r e v i r e R iv e R v i o g N re r r e a v i W R o l g n Augathella a L r e v i R d r a W Chesterton Range N.P. Charleville Mitchell Morven Roma Cheepie Miles River Chinchilla amine Cond Condamine k e e r r ve C i R l M e a nn a h lo Dalby c r a Surat a B e n e o B a Wyandra R Tara i v e r QUEENSLAND Brisbane Toowoomba Moonie Thrushton er National e Riv ooni Park M k Beardmore Reservoir Millmerran e r e ve r i R C ir e e St George W n i Allora b e Bollon N r e Jack Taylor Weir iv R Cunnamulla e n n N lo k a e B Warwick e r C Inglewood a l a l l a g n u Coolmunda Reservoir M N acintyre River Goondiwindi 25 Dirranbandi M Stanthorpe 0 50 Currawinya N.P. -
GBMWHA Summary of Natural & Cultural Heritage Information
GREATER BLUE MOUNTAINS WORLD HERITAGE AREA Summary of Natural & Cultural Heritage Information compiled by Ian Brown Elanus Word and Image for NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service November 2004 CONTENTS 1. Introduction 2 2. Essential Facts 3 3. World Heritage Values 5 4. Geography, Landscape and Climate 6 5. Geology and Geomorphology 8 6. Vegetation 13 7. Fauna 15 8. Aboriginal Cultural Heritage 16 9. Non-Aboriginal Cultural Heritage 18 10. Conservation History 20 11. Selected References 24 Summary of Natural and Cultural Heritage Information Greater Blue Mountains World Heritage Area November 2004 1 1. INTRODUCTION This document was prepared as a product of the Interpretation and Visitor Orientation Plan for the Greater Blue Mountains World Heritage Area. It is intended primarily as a summary reference of key information for use by those who are preparing public information and interpretation for the world heritage area. It is not intended to be fully comprehensive and anyone requiring detailed information on any topic is encouraged to refer to the list of selected references and additional material not listed. It is also recommended that all facts quoted here are checked from primary sources. A major source for this document was the Greater Blue Mountains World Heritage Area Nomination (see reference list), which is a very useful compendium of information but of limited availability. All other key sources used in compiling this summary are listed in the references, along with some other useful documents which were not consulted. Some items of information contained here (eg. total area of wilderness and comparisons with other east coast wilderness areas) have been derived from original research for this project. -
New South Wales Class 1 Load Carrying Vehicle Operator’S Guide
New South Wales Class 1 Load Carrying Vehicle Operator’s Guide Important: This Operator’s Guide is for three Notices separated by Part A, Part B and Part C. Please read sections carefully as separate conditions may apply. For enquiries about roads and restrictions listed in this document please contact Transport for NSW Road Access unit: [email protected] 27 October 2020 New South Wales Class 1 Load Carrying Vehicle Operator’s Guide Contents Purpose ................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Definitions ............................................................................................................................................................... 4 NSW Travel Zones .................................................................................................................................................... 5 Part A – NSW Class 1 Load Carrying Vehicles Notice ................................................................................................ 9 About the Notice ..................................................................................................................................................... 9 1: Travel Conditions ................................................................................................................................................. 9 1.1 Pilot and Escort Requirements .......................................................................................................................... -
Lachlan Water Resource Plan
Lachlan Water Resource Plan Surface water resource description Published by the Department of Primary Industries, a Division of NSW Department of Industry, Skills and Regional Development. Lachlan Water Resource Plan: Surface water resource description First published April 2018 More information www.dpi.nsw.gov.au Acknowledgments This document was prepared by Dayle Green. It expands upon a previous description of the Lachlan Valley published by the NSW Office of Water in 2011 (Green, Burrell, Petrovic and Moss 2011, Water resources and management overview – Lachlan catchment ) Cover images: Lachlan River at Euabalong; Lake Cargelligo, Macquarie Perch, Carcoar Dam Photos courtesy Dayle Green and Department of Primary Industries. The maps in this report contain data sourced from: Murray-Darling Basin Authority © Commonwealth of Australia (Murray–Darling Basin Authority) 2012. (Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License) NSW DPI Water © Spatial Services - NSW Department of Finance, Services and Innovation [2016], Panorama Avenue, Bathurst 2795 http://spatialservices.finance.nsw.gov.au NSW Office of Environment and Heritage Atlas of NSW Wildlife data © State of New South Wales through Department of Environment and Heritage (2016) 59-61 Goulburn Street Sydney 2000 http://www.biotnet.nsw.gov.au NSW DPI Fisheries Fish Community Status and Threatened Species data © State of New South Wales through Department of Industry (2016) 161 Kite Street Orange 2800 http://www.dpi.nsw.gov.au/fishing/species-protection/threatened-species-distributions-in-nsw © State of New South Wales through the Department of Industry, Skills and Regional Development, 2018. You may copy, distribute and otherwise freely deal with this publication for any purpose, provided that you attribute the NSW Department of Primary Industries as the owner. -
Volume 38 No 2 Autumn 2013
Volume 38 Issue 2 Berowra Waters from the Great North Walk, A pleasant day walk. Autumn 2013 Wouldn’t you like to be here? Hiking in the Zanskar region of Ladakh, from Padum to Lamayuru. Photo: Nina Gallo Pagodas, Capertee region. Photo: Michael Keats, The Bush Club Walk Safely—Walk with a Club T h e Bushwalker The Official Publication of Bushwalking NSW Inc Volume 38, Issue 2, Autumn 2013 ISSN 0313 2684 Editor: Roger Caffin From the editor’s desk. [email protected] Graphic Design & Assembly: AME CHANGE: The Confederation is now known as Bushwalking Barry Hanlon NSW. There is an optional ‘Incorporated’ at the end, but that is just Proofreader: Roy Jamieson Na legalism and is not needed in ordinary use. However, I imagine that we will continue to refer to ‘the Confederation’ for quite some time as Confederation Officers: it is convenient. President: David Trinder Administration Officer: [email protected] Website: www.bushwalking.org.au Articles for Publication Address all correspondence to: We are always happy to receive pictures for the Inside Front Cover. If you would like to PO Box 119, Newtown, NSW 2042 see yours published, send them in. Note that I need the originals, straight from the camera and uncropped and unretouched, so we can set them up for the printing process. We need high resolution for large pictures. In particular, photos embedded in DOC files are not accepted, and neither are scans of standard photographic prints - with Bushwalking NSW Inc represents the possible exception of historical items where the print is all that exists. -
Professionals Australia's Response on Behalf of Members in Relation to The
Professionals Australia’s response on behalf of members in relation to the proposed restructure PA met with engineers who work in the Engineering Division on two occasions at WNSW Parramatta offices with members dialling-in from regional NSW. PA encouraged members to put forward their professional views on the proposed restructure on whether it addressed existing problems. PA has received some very detailed responses from our members. It is clear there is a high level of concern that the restructure will have undesired impacts on both employees and the functions of Engineering. Many members have taken the opportunity to respond directly to the WNSW email address set up for feedback. This submission does not repeat those comments. This submission is concerned with the first order issue – Does the restructure enhance the undertaking of engineering functions by WaterNSW or not? The next level of concerns which appear to be the main focus of the input provided via the WNSW email are the detail of position descriptions and the arrangements for filling the structure. We understand such matters have also attracted a large number of comments and concerns from members. However, those issues arise only when the first order issue is satisfied. The focus of this submission is whether the restructure has accurately identified the deficiencies and whether the proposal will address those deficiencies. What can a restructure address? A restructure can address issues such as resourcing levels, specific function focus and functional alignment. It cannot address issues caused by dysfunctional organisational behaviour, lack of effective processes, etc. Does the restructure enhance engineering functions at WNSW? The view of WNSW engineers is that overall the restructure will not result in the enhanced performance of the engineering functions required by WNSW. -
A Case Study of the Kowmung River at Cedar Ford, Australia
International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning Vol. 16, No. 3, June, 2021, pp. 497-501 Journal homepage: http://iieta.org/journals/ijsdp Application of Deep Learning Method for Daily Streamflow Time-Series Prediction: A Case Study of the Kowmung River at Cedar Ford, Australia Sarmad Dashti Latif1*, Ali Najah Ahmed2 1 Civil Engineering Department, College of Engineering, Komar University of Science and Technology, Sulaimany 46001, Kurdistan Region, Iraq 2 Institute for Energy Infrastructure (IEI), Universiti Tenaga Nasional (UNITEN), Kajang 43000, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia Corresponding Author Email: [email protected] https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.160310 ABSTRACT Received: 12 May 2020 Sustainable management of water supplies faces a comprehensive challenge due to global Accepted: 9 December 2020 climate change. Improving forecasts of streamflow based on erratic precipitation is a significant activity nowadays. In recent years, the techniques of data-driven have been widely Keywords: used in the hydrological parameter’s prediction especially streamflow. In the current research, streamflow prediction, artificial a deep learning model namely Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), and two conventional intelligence, deep learning, machine machine learning models namely, Random Forest (RF), and Tree Boost (TB) were used to learning, LSTM, random forest, tree boost predict the streamflow of the Kowmung river at Cedar Ford in Australia. Different scenarios proposed to determine the optimal combination of input predictor variables, and the input predictor variables were selected based on the auto-correlation function (ACF). Model output was evaluated using indices of the root mean square error (RMSE), and the Nash and Sutcliffe coefficient (NSE). The findings showed that the LSTM model outperformed RF and TB in predicting the streamflow with RMSE and NSE equal to 102.411, and 0.911 respectively. -
Macquarie Perch Refuge Project – Final Report for Lachlan CMA Author: Luke Pearce, Fisheries Conservation Manager, NSW DPI, Albury
Published by NSW Trade & Investment, Department of Primary Industries First published May 2013 Title: Macquarie Perch Refuge Project – Final Report for Lachlan CMA Author: Luke Pearce, Fisheries Conservation Manager, NSW DPI, Albury. Print: ISBN 978 1 74256 500 2 Web: ISBN: 978 1 74256 501 9 Acknowledgements I thank the Lachlan Catchment Management Authority for providing the funding for the project. I would like to acknowledge the following staff, Fin Martin and Geoff Minchin for their input, assistance, advice and support on this project. The following staff in Fisheries NSW who worked on the project and made it possible; John Pursey, Dean Gilligan, Trevor Daly, Allan Lugg, Sarah Fairfull, Justin Stanger, Tim McGarry, Martin Asmus, Matthew McLellan, Lachie Jess and Antonia Creese. I thank the Recreational Fishing Trust for their ongoing support and funding for the Macquarie Perch captive breeding program; without it there would not be fish to stock into the refuge site. I would also like to acknowledge the Central Acclimatisation Society, in particular Karl Schaerf and Peter Byron for their ongoing support of the project and threatened native fish. TRIM reference: PUB13/61 Jobtrack 12067 © State of New South Wales through the Department of Trade and Investment, Regional Infrastructure and Services, 2013. You may copy, distribute and otherwise freely deal with this publication for any purpose, provided that you attribute the NSW Department of Primary Industries as the owner. Disclaimer: The information contained in this publication is based on knowledge and understanding at the time of writing (May 2013). However, because of advances in knowledge, users are reminded of the need to ensure that information upon which they rely is up to date and to check currency of the information with the appropriate officer of the Department of Primary Industries or the user’s independent adviser. -
Dubbo Zirconia Project
Dubbo Zirconia Project Aquatic Ecology Assessment Prepared by Alison Hunt & Associates September 2013 Specialist Consultant Studies Compendium Volume 2, Part 7 This page has intentionally been left blank Aquatic Ecology Assessment Prepared for: R.W. Corkery & Co. Pty Limited 62 Hill Street ORANGE NSW 2800 Tel: (02) 6362 5411 Fax: (02) 6361 3622 Email: [email protected] On behalf of: Australian Zirconia Ltd 65 Burswood Road BURSWOOD WA 6100 Tel: (08) 9227 5677 Fax: (08) 9227 8178 Email: [email protected] Prepared by: Alison Hunt & Associates 8 Duncan Street ARNCLIFFE NSW 2205 Tel: (02) 9599 0402 Email: [email protected] September 2013 Alison Hunt & Associates SPECIALIST CONSULTANT STUDIES AUSTRALIAN ZIRCONIA LTD Part 7: Aquatic Ecology Assessment Dubbo Zirconia Project Report No. 545/05 This Copyright is included for the protection of this document COPYRIGHT © Alison Hunt & Associates, 2013 and © Australian Zirconia Ltd, 2013 All intellectual property and copyright reserved. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study, research, criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright Act, 1968, no part of this report may be reproduced, transmitted, stored in a retrieval system or adapted in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise) without written permission. Enquiries should be addressed to Alison Hunt & Associates. Alison Hunt & Associates RW CORKERY & CO. PTY. LIMITED AUSTRALIAN ZIRCONIA LTD Dubbo Zirconia Project Aquatic Ecology Final September 2013 SPECIALIST CONSULTANT STUDIES AUSTRALIAN ZIRCONIA LTD Part 7: Aquatic Ecology Assessment Dubbo Zirconia Project Report No. 545/05 SUMMARY Alison Hunt & Associates Pty Ltd was commissioned by RW Corkery & Co Pty Limited, on behalf of Australian Zirconia Limited (AZL), to undertake an assessment of aquatic ecology for the proposed development of the Dubbo Zirconia Project (DZP), which would be located at Toongi, approximately 25 km south of Dubbo in Central West NSW. -
Fish River Water Supply Scheme
Nomination of FISH RIVER WATER SUPPLY SCHEME as a National Engineering Landmark Contents 1. Introduction 3 2. Nomination Form 4 Owner's Agreement 5 3. Location Map 6 4. Glossary, Abbreviations and Units 8 5. Heritage Assessment 10 5.1 Basic Data 10 5.2 Heritage Significance 11 5.2.1 Historic phase 11 5.2.2 Historic individuals and association 36 5.2.3 Creative or technical achievement 37 5.2.4 Research potential – teaching and understanding 38 5.2.5 Social or cultural 40 5.2.6 Rarity 41 5.2.7 Representativeness 41 6. Statement of Significance 42 7. Proposed Citation 43 8. References 44 9. CD-ROM of this document plus images obtained to date - 1 - - 2 - 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Fish River Water Supply Scheme [FRWS] is a medium size but important water supply with the headwaters in the Central Highlands of NSW, west of the Great Dividing Range and to the south of Oberon. It supplies water in an area from Oberon, north to Portland, Mount Piper Power Station and beyond, and east, across the Great Dividing Range, to Wallerawang town, Wallerawang Power Station, Lithgow and the Upper Blue Mountains. It is the source of water for many small to medium communities, including Rydal, Lidsdale, Cullen Bullen, Glen Davis and Marrangaroo, as well as many rural properties through which its pipelines pass. It was established by Act of Parliament in 1945 as a Trading Undertaking of the NSW State Government. The FRWS had its origins as a result of the chronic water supply problems of the towns of Lithgow, Wallerawang, Portland and Oberon from as early as 1937, which were exacerbated by the 1940-43 drought. -
Livestock, Land Cover, and Environmental History: The
Livestock,Land Cover, and Environmental History: The Tablelandsof New SouthWales, Australia, 1820-1920 KarlW Butzer*and David M. Helgren** *DepartmentofGeography and the Environment, University ofTexas at Austin **DepartmentofGeography, SanJose State University Forsoutheastern Australia, arrival of the First Fleet in 1788raises similar issues in environmental history as the 1492landing of Columbus in the Americas. But Anglo-Australian settlement isyounger and better documented, bothin termsof scientific proxy data and historical sources, which include data on stockingrates that generally werelight. Environmental concerns were voiced early, and a livelydebate continues both among professionals andthe lay public, with Australian geographers playing a major academic and applied role. This article addresses environmentaldegradation often attributed to earlypastoralism (and implicit clearance) in theTablelands of NewSouth Wales. Methods include: (1) comparisonofwell-reported travel itineraries of1817-1833 with mod- ernland cover and streamchannels; (2) criticalreviews of high-resolutionpollen profiles and theissues of Aboriginalvs. Anglo-Australian fireecology; and (3) identificationofsoil erosion and gullying both before and afterAnglo-Australian intrusion. The results indicate that (a) landcover of the Tablelands islittle changed since priorto Contact,although some species are less common, while invasive genera of legumes have modified the groundcover; (b) thecharcoal trace in pollen profiles prior to Contact supports an ecologicalimpact -
District 11 Eastern Map (PDF, 2.2
o! E o! E E E E E E E E E E E t S t s a E E T E he S n Rd ow kajo y Buc R iv e r W a y Tat hra Rd Joint Fuel iver Candelo - rray R Mu Bega Rd E Forest Hill RA E t S C a e m n an S a L i d n d l m R l e tain i ha o oun lo d W n Management w M alo - y y ang W W taw o R Tan lumla Rd iv e r t a S nim Bur Mt Cobberas No 1 E E Un Program n am E ed Eden Mount Darragh Rd St CFA District 11 d R art thc Ca (Eastern) ! ! M er t im S b u t ! e la D b r S ! y a t M e k r ! ! a M E ! E r 2020-2021 to 2022-2023 D Suggan Buggan ! e in a K r ! u h rt n St A d Gordo R ! e t ! a g ! e Toa ! l Moun llo St Beehive e t Darragh Rd ! D ! d ! Creek RA ! R E e E ! ! t a ! g ! a r r ! ! u New South B ! ! ! +$ 2020-21 Planned Burn (<50Ha) ! ! Wales ! ! ! ! TUBBUT ! ! ! - MOUNT ! +$ ! 2021-22 Planned Burn (<50Ha) ! WHITTAKERS ! o! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! t +$ ! S 2022-23 Planned Burn (<50Ha) ! ! ! am ! ! h ! D d ! ! e n Per ! le y icoe ! ! g W St ! a la ! a ! t b e Bom ! Concordia DELEGATE - Rd ! St ! d 2020-21 Planned Burn (50Ha +) ! Gully RA ! ! ! DEAD END R ! ! r e ! ! ! TRACK E v T i ! ! o R ! ! w Tubbut BENDOC - BENDOC - a ! y m ! w Deddick b ! ROARING CAMP CORNER a o ! ! ! 2021-22 Planned Burn (50Ha +) ! R n Valley S ! d Mt Seldom ! TRACK ! DELEGATE - Seen ! ! E ! BORDER TRACK ! BONANG-YELLOW ! ! ! # # # # # # # # ! 2022-23 Planned Burn (50Ha +) ! STREAK MINE # # # # # # ! # # # ! ! ! E ! ! ! ! # # # # # # # # ! TRACK ! ! ! ! ! # # # # # # ! ! # # # # # ! ! ! ! ! ! # # # ! # ! # # # # # # ! ! Non Burning Treatment - Mineral Earth Disturbance # # # #