The Native Vegetation of the Nattai and Bargo Reserves

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Native Vegetation of the Nattai and Bargo Reserves The Native Vegetation of the Nattai and Bargo Reserves Project funded under the Central Directorate Parks and Wildlife Division Biodiversity Data Priorities Program Conservation Assessment and Data Unit Conservation Programs and Planning Branch, Metropolitan Environmental Protection and Regulation Division Department of Environment and Conservation ACKNOWLEDGMENTS CADU (Central) Manager Special thanks to: Julie Ravallion Nattai NP Area staff for providing general assistance as well as their knowledge of the CADU (Central) Bioregional Data Group area, especially: Raf Pedroza and Adrian Coordinator Johnstone. Daniel Connolly Citation CADU (Central) Flora Project Officer DEC (2004) The Native Vegetation of the Nattai Nathan Kearnes and Bargo Reserves. Unpublished Report. Department of Environment and Conservation, CADU (Central) GIS, Data Management and Hurstville. Database Coordinator This report was funded by the Central Peter Ewin Directorate Parks and Wildlife Division, Biodiversity Survey Priorities Program. Logistics and Survey Planning All photographs are held by DEC. To obtain a Nathan Kearnes copy please contact the Bioregional Data Group Coordinator, DEC Hurstville Field Surveyors David Thomas Cover Photos Teresa James Nathan Kearnes Feature Photo (Daniel Connolly) Daniel Connolly White-striped Freetail-bat (Michael Todd), Rock Peter Ewin Plate-Heath Mallee (DEC) Black Crevice-skink (David O’Connor) Aerial Photo Interpretation Tall Moist Blue Gum Forest (DEC) Ian Roberts (Nattai and Bargo, this report; Rainforest (DEC) Woronora, 2003; Western Sydney, 1999) Short-beaked Echidna (D. O’Connor) Bob Wilson (Warragamba, 2003) Grey Gum (Daniel Connolly) Pintech (Pty Ltd) Red-crowned Toadlet (Dave Hunter) Data Analysis ISBN 07313 6851 7 Nathan Kearnes Daniel Connolly Report Writing and Map Production Nathan Kearnes Daniel Connolly EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report describes the distribution and composition of the native vegetation within and immediately surrounding Nattai National Park, Nattai State Conservation Area and Bargo State Conservation Area. The purpose of the project has been to provide detailed information on the type, extent and condition of the native vegetation communities. The project addresses a long-standing need for detailed vegetation information to meet the needs of park management associated with water catchment protection as well as management of wilderness and world heritage conservation values. The information and associated data layers generated from this project can now be directly integrated into fire management planning and conservation related assessments. This mapping project extends the mapping work completed in the north of Nattai National Park under the mapping program for the Special Areas Plans of Management (SASPoM). Funding was provided by Central Directorate Parks and Wildlife Division to complete the southern half of Nattai National Park along with Bargo State Conservation Area and Bargo River Crown Reserves. The completion of this project provides a fine-scale vegetation mapping coverage from the Illawarra coast to Kanangra-Boyd National Park. A comprehensive field survey program was carried out to augment the information gathered in the Warragamba and Woronora Special Area mapping projects. An additional 69 floristic survey sites were collected, bringing the total number in the study area to 364 sites. All vascular plants were identified and vegetation, soil and disturbance information were recorded and entered into an electronic database. This data was used to classify vegetation communities using quantitative analytical techniques. Thirty-seven vegetation communities have been identified and described in a separate profile. Each profile describes the composition and structure of the vegetation, example locations, disturbance levels present and includes a sample photograph. The Nattai and Bargo reserves support a high level of floristic diversity. The diversity arises from the variations in soil and geological substrates, topographic variables, rainfall and elevation gradients. Within the reserves there are ten broad geology classes (Bryan, 1966; Rose, 1966); elevation that ranges from around 100 to 900 metres above sea level; rainfall ranging from approximately 700 to over 1000 millimetres per annum. Topographically the reserves include both narrow and broad sandstone tablelands, deeply incised valleys and escarpments and large river valleys supporting tall alluvial forests. Over 800 native flora species have been identified from field sampling and searches of existing literature. Structurally the vegetation varies between rainforest, tall forest, open forest, woodland, heath, mallee and swamps. The 37 vegetation communities include some typical of Sydney sandstone environments such as the shrubby forests across the Nattai Plateau, while the Burragorang Valley features dry grassy woodlands that have more in common with vegetation in the central west of NSW. Tall grassy forests found on shale and basalts of the Southern Highlands are uncommon within the reserves as were grassy and shrubby sandstone-shale transition forests. Three Endangered Ecological Communities (TSC Act, 1995) were located and a further 14 were classified as vegetation communities of regional significance. Twenty-two of the species recorded are either Threatened (TSC Act, 1995) or listed as a RoTAP (Briggs and Leigh, 1995). Of the Threatened Species four are listed as Endangered and a further five as Vulnerable. A 1: 25 000 scale map of the vegetation communities of the study area has been completed. This map was constructed using detailed Aerial Photograph Interpretation (API) of 1:25000 photography (1994) in conjunction with environmental data layers that describe the patterns in geology, elevation, rainfall and aspect. Digital data layers for use in ARCView GIS are available, which describe the distribution of vegetation communities as well as other landscape features such as exposed rock and cleared land. The derived mapping can now be used to display vegetation communities, vegetation structure, disturbance, amount of rock present, understorey type, canopy density and tree species present. This data can now be widely applied to a number of uses ranging from environmental reporting, fire management planning, conservation assessments and field operations. The Native Vegetation of the Nattai and Bargo Reserves 3 CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS...............................................................................................................................2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY..............................................................................................................................3 CONTENTS ..................................................................................................................................................4 1 INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................................7 1.1 BACKGROUND ..................................................................................................................................7 1.2 APPROACH.......................................................................................................................................7 1.3 STUDY AREA ....................................................................................................................................7 1.3.1 Location...................................................................................................................................7 1.3.2 Environmental Setting.............................................................................................................8 1.3.3 Regional Context ..................................................................................................................16 2 METHODS...........................................................................................................................................19 2.1 REVIEW OF EXISTING INFORMATION.................................................................................................19 2.2 EXISTING SITE DATA.......................................................................................................................19 2.3 SURVEY STRATIFICATION AND SITE SELECTION................................................................................20 2.4 FIELD SAMPLING.............................................................................................................................20 2.5 SITE NOMENCLATURE .....................................................................................................................21 2.6 DATABASE STORAGE ......................................................................................................................22 2.7 TAXONOMIC REVIEW.......................................................................................................................22 2.8 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH INTERPRETATION...........................................................................................22 2.8.1 Objectives .............................................................................................................................22 2.8.2 Area Mapped and Photography Used ..................................................................................22 2.8.3 Aerial Photo Interpretation and Landcover Classification.....................................................23 2.8.4 Patterns in Vegetation Cover................................................................................................23
Recommended publications
  • Wildflowers to Grow in Your Garden Here Is the Key to the List Large
    Wildflowers to grow in your garden Here is the key to the list Trees Ground covers Shrubs Eucalypts Banksias Myrtle family Banksias Others Baeckea Other Beaufortia Calothamnus Chamelaucium Hypocalymna Kunzea Melaleuca and Callistemon Scholtzia Thryptomene Verticordia Large trees. Think very carefully before you plant them! Large trees, such as lemon scented gums or spotted gums may look great in parks - at least local councils seem to think so (we would rather see local plants). But you may regret planting them in a modern small garden. That doesn't mean there is no room for trees. There are hundreds of attractive small trees that grow very well in native gardens. Here are just a few. Small trees Eucalypts with showy flowers. Eucalytpus caesia Comes in two sub species with the one known as "silver princess" being readily available in Perth. Lovely multi- stemmed weeping tree with pendulous pink flowers and silver-bell fruits. E. torquata Small upright tree with attractive pink flowers. Very drought resistant. E. ficifolia Often called the WA Flowering gum. Ranges in size from small to quite large and in flower colour from deep red to = Corymbia ficifolia orange to pale pink. In WA subject to a serious disease - called canker. Many trees succumb when about 10 or so years old, either dying or becoming very unhealthy. E. preissiana Bell fruited mallee. Small tree (or shrub) with bright yellow flowers. E. erythrocorys Illyarrie, red cap gum or helmet nut gum. Large golden flowers in February preceded by a bright red bud cap. Tree tends to be bit floppy and to need pruning.
    [Show full text]
  • GBMWHA Summary of Natural & Cultural Heritage Information
    GREATER BLUE MOUNTAINS WORLD HERITAGE AREA Summary of Natural & Cultural Heritage Information compiled by Ian Brown Elanus Word and Image for NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service November 2004 CONTENTS 1. Introduction 2 2. Essential Facts 3 3. World Heritage Values 5 4. Geography, Landscape and Climate 6 5. Geology and Geomorphology 8 6. Vegetation 13 7. Fauna 15 8. Aboriginal Cultural Heritage 16 9. Non-Aboriginal Cultural Heritage 18 10. Conservation History 20 11. Selected References 24 Summary of Natural and Cultural Heritage Information Greater Blue Mountains World Heritage Area November 2004 1 1. INTRODUCTION This document was prepared as a product of the Interpretation and Visitor Orientation Plan for the Greater Blue Mountains World Heritage Area. It is intended primarily as a summary reference of key information for use by those who are preparing public information and interpretation for the world heritage area. It is not intended to be fully comprehensive and anyone requiring detailed information on any topic is encouraged to refer to the list of selected references and additional material not listed. It is also recommended that all facts quoted here are checked from primary sources. A major source for this document was the Greater Blue Mountains World Heritage Area Nomination (see reference list), which is a very useful compendium of information but of limited availability. All other key sources used in compiling this summary are listed in the references, along with some other useful documents which were not consulted. Some items of information contained here (eg. total area of wilderness and comparisons with other east coast wilderness areas) have been derived from original research for this project.
    [Show full text]
  • Hut News September 2020 Reduced 6
    Hut News Issue no. 384 September 2020 Blue Mountains Conservation Society Inc. HUT NEWS Nature conservation saves for tomorrow Blue Gum Forest - a threatened future, part 2 Wyn Jones Our walk continued into Blue Gum Forest through the years yet to wither and die. Part of me promised these trees stripped of leaves by a hot burn, heading west magnificent trees AND the valley that they should not where the understory was completely burnt. The trees suffer another fire, for this forest is my soul, your soul, were shedding bark which protected them from our heritage. killing heat. Blue Gums have about 1-2 cm of smooth bark to protect them from too much heat, though it is Climbing up Perrys Track, I fought sadness and not enough to prevent epicormic bud death, I suspect. elation, step after step. With my friends in 2006, I had measured 2000 of these forest trees, which included And as we have seen before, many of the large trees the giants and the saplings risen from the fire before showed little or no epicormic growth on most of the 2006. The giants included a few, very old warrior trees. trunk, the crown being the only part which was Yet most are now gone, or are going. We must greening up. Taking lunch at my most favourite spot measure them again though this will be a forensic by the river, my past self conversed with the reality of analysis of the forest, one which will be handed on to the present: for this place had changed.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Materialsupplementary Material
    10.1071/BT13149_AC © CSIRO 2013 Australian Journal of Botany 2013, 61(6), 436–445 SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL Comparative dating of Acacia: combining fossils and multiple phylogenies to infer ages of clades with poor fossil records Joseph T. MillerA,E, Daniel J. MurphyB, Simon Y. W. HoC, David J. CantrillB and David SeiglerD ACentre for Australian National Biodiversity Research, CSIRO Plant Industry, GPO Box 1600 Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia. BRoyal Botanic Gardens Melbourne, Birdwood Avenue, South Yarra, Vic. 3141, Australia. CSchool of Biological Sciences, Edgeworth David Building, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia. DDepartment of Plant Biology, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801, USA. ECorresponding author. Email: [email protected] Table S1 Materials used in the study Taxon Dataset Genbank Acacia abbreviata Maslin 2 3 JF420287 JF420065 JF420395 KC421289 KC796176 JF420499 Acacia adoxa Pedley 2 3 JF420044 AF523076 AF195716 AF195684; AF195703 Acacia ampliceps Maslin 1 KC421930 EU439994 EU811845 Acacia anceps DC. 2 3 JF420244 JF420350 JF419919 JF420130 JF420456 Acacia aneura F.Muell. ex Benth 2 3 JF420259 JF420036 JF420366 JF419935 JF420146 KF048140 Acacia aneura F.Muell. ex Benth. 1 2 3 JF420293 JF420402 KC421323 JQ248740 JF420505 Acacia baeuerlenii Maiden & R.T.Baker 2 3 JF420229 JQ248866 JF420336 JF419909 JF420115 JF420448 Acacia beckleri Tindale 2 3 JF420260 JF420037 JF420367 JF419936 JF420147 JF420473 Acacia cochlearis (Labill.) H.L.Wendl. 2 3 KC283897 KC200719 JQ943314 AF523156 KC284140 KC957934 Acacia cognata Domin 2 3 JF420246 JF420022 JF420352 JF419921 JF420132 JF420458 Acacia cultriformis A.Cunn. ex G.Don 2 3 JF420278 JF420056 JF420387 KC421263 KC796172 JF420494 Acacia cupularis Domin 2 3 JF420247 JF420023 JF420353 JF419922 JF420133 JF420459 Acacia dealbata Link 2 3 JF420269 JF420378 KC421251 KC955787 JF420485 Acacia dealbata Link 2 3 KC283375 KC200761 JQ942686 KC421315 KC284195 Acacia deanei (R.T.Baker) M.B.Welch, Coombs 2 3 JF420294 JF420403 KC421329 KC955795 & McGlynn JF420506 Acacia dempsteri F.Muell.
    [Show full text]
  • Telopea · Escholarship.Usyd.Edu.Au/Journals/Index.Php/TEL · ISSN 0312-9764 (Print) · ISSN 2200-4025 (Online)
    Ρ ιΙ 'Λ ϊ Volume 1 (6): 409-420 T elopea Publication Date: March 1980 . , . _ . The Royal dx.doi.org/io.775i/teiopeai9803603 Journal ot Plant Systematics “ 2™ plantnet.rbgsyd.nsw.gov.au/Telopea · escholarship.usyd.edu.au/journals/index.php/TEL · ISSN 0312-9764 (Print) · ISSN 2200-4025 (Online) Telopea 1 (6): 409-420 (1980) 409 BAECKEA RAMOSISSIMA A. Gunn. (MYRTACEAE) A TAXONOMIC AND ECOLOGICAL STUDY G. W. CARR* (Accepted 19.6.1978) ABSTRACT Carr, G. W. (Botany Department, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia 3083) 1980. Baeckea ramosissimaA. Cunn. {Myrtaceae). A taxonomic and ecological Study. Telopea 1 (6): 409-420.—The taxonomic history Baeckeaof ramosissima is given. Two subspecies are recognized: B. ramosissima subsp. ramosissima is widely distributed in coastal and inland localities from northern New South Wales through Victoria to South Australia and Tasmania;B. ramosissima subsp. prostrata (Hook, f.) G. W. Carr, comb, et stat. nov., occurs in southern coastal New South Wales, southern Victoria and northern and western Tasmania. Both taxa are described and illustrated, also a key to their identification is provided. Distribution of the taxa is mapped. Geographical variation, ecology and biology are discussed. INTRODUCTION Baeckea ramosissima (as currently recognized by Australian botanists) is a widespread and very distinct species occurring in south eastern Australia. The eastern Australian species most closely allied to it are B. crassifolia Lindl. and B. ericaea F. Muell. My observations on its Victorian populations have supported the view of Willis (1973) that it is “A polymorphic assemblage, some populations of which may merit taxonomic distinction.” The descriptions by Black (1952), Curtis (1956) and Beadle et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Tahmoor Colliery - Longwalls 28 to 30
    REPORT: BUILT HERITAGE MANAGEMENT PLAN GLENCORE: Tahmoor Colliery - Longwalls 28 to 30 Management Plan for Potential Impacts to Built Heritage © MSEC MARCH 2014 | REPORT NUMBER: MSEC646-13 | REVISION A AUTHORISATION OF MANAGEMENT PLAN Authorised on behalf of Tahmoor Colliery: Name: Signature: Position: Date: DOCUMENT REGISTER Date Report No. Rev Comments Dec-10 MSEC446-13 A Draft for review Feb-11 MSEC446-13 B Final plan Dec-12 MSEC567-13 A Updated for Longwall 27 to include Tahmoor House Feb-14 MSEC646-13 A Updated for Longwalls 28 to 30 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This Management Plan was prepared with the assistance of Tahmoor Colliery, Niche Environment and Heritage, Biosis Research and John Matheson & Associates. References:- Biosis, (2009). Tahmoor Colliery – Longwalls 27-30, Impacts of Subsidence on Cultural Heritage. Biosis Research, May 2009. JMA, (2012). 27 Remembrance Drive, Tahmoor Structural Inspection Report, John Matheson & Associates, Report No. 0194, Rev. 1, July 2012. MSEC, (2009). Tahmoor Colliery Longwalls 27 to 30 - The Prediction of Subsidence Parameters and the Assessment of Mine Subsidence Impacts on Natural Features and Items of Surface Infrastructure due to mining Longwalls 27 to 30 at Tahmoor Colliery in support of the SMP Application. Mine Subsidence Engineering Consultants, Report No. MSEC355, Revision B, July 2009. MSEC, (2013). Tahmoor Colliery Longwalls 29 and 30 – The Effects of the Proposed Modified Commencing Ends of Longwalls 29 and 30 at Tahmoor Colliery on the Subsidence Predictions and Impact Assessments. Mine Subsidence Engineering Consultants, Report No. MSEC645, 2013. MSEC, (2013b). Tahmoor House Monitoring Reports during the mining of Longwall 27, Report Series MSEC620. Niche, (2012). Heritage Assessment of Tahmoor House, Niche Environment and Heritage, Project No.
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Native Plants Society Canberra Region(Inc)
    AUSTRALIAN NATIVE PLANTS SOCIETY CANBERRA REGION (INC) Journal Vol. 17 No. 4 December 2012 ISSN 1447-1507 Print Post Approved PP299436/00143 Contents ANPS Canberra Region Report 1 Whose Bean genus is that? 3 Winter Walks 6 Signs renewal for Frost Hollow to Forest Walk 16 Touga Road Touring 21 Study Group Snippets 25 Acacia Study Group Field Trip 27 ANPSA Study Groups 34 ANPS contacts and membership details inside back cover Cover: Correa reflexa, Kambah Pool, North; Photo: Martin Butterfield Journal articles The deadline dates for submissions are 1 February The Journal is a forum for the exchange of members' (March), 1 May (June), 1 August (September) and and others' views and experiences of gardening with, 1 November (December). Send articles or photos to: propagating and conserving Australian plants. Journal Editor All contributions, however short, are welcome. Gail Ritchie Knight Contributions may be typed or handwritten, and 1612 Sutton Road accompanied by photographs and drawings. Sutton NSW 2620 e-mail: [email protected] Submit photographs as either electronic files, tel: 0416 097 500 such as JPGs, or prints. Please enclose a stamped, self-addressed envelope if you would like your prints Paid advertising is available in this Journal. Details returned. If possible set your digital camera to take from the Editor. high resolution photos. If photos cannot be emailed, Society website: http://nativeplants-canberra.asn.au make a CD and send it by post. If you have any Printed by Elect Printing, Fyshwick, ACT queries please contact the editor http://www.electprinting.com.au/ Original text may be reprinted, unless otherwise indicated, provided an acknowledgement for the source is given.
    [Show full text]
  • Scientific Name Common Name Victorian A
    Table 1: Species present in a 2km radius of Crib Point (VBA database search 13 Aug 2020) Scientific Name Common Name Victorian Advisory List Austrolestes analis Slender Ringtail Microcarbo melanoleucos Little Pied Cormorant Calamanthus fuliginosus Striated Fieldwren Acacia verticillata Prickly Moses Poa labillardierei Common Tussock-grass Selliera radicans Shiny Swamp-mat Phyllostachys spp. Bamboo Eudyptula minor Little Penguin Turnix varius Painted Button-quail Phaps chalcoptera Common Bronzewing Phaps elegans Brush Bronzewing Ocyphaps lophotes Crested Pigeon Lewinia pectoralis Lewin's Rail Vulnerable Hypotaenidia philippensis Buff-banded Rail Poliocephalus poliocephalus Hoary-headed Grebe Ardenna tenuirostris Short-tailed Shearwater Thalassarche melanophris Black-browed Albatross Vulnerable Thalassarche cauta Shy Albatross Vulnerable Phalacrocorax carbo Great Cormorant Phalacrocorax sulcirostris Little Black Cormorant Phalacrocorax fuscescens Black-faced Cormorant Near threatened Phalacrocorax varius Pied Cormorant Near threatened Morus serrator Australasian Gannet Pelecanus conspicillatus Australian Pelican Hydroprogne caspia Caspian Tern Near threatened Thalasseus bergii Crested Tern Sternula nereis Fairy Tern Endangered Chroicocephalus novaehollandiae Silver Gull Haematopus longirostris Pied Oystercatcher Vanellus miles Masked Lapwing Pluvialis fulva Pacific Golden Plover Vulnerable Charadrius bicinctus Double-banded Plover Charadrius ruficapillus Red-capped Plover Numenius madagascariensis Eastern Curlew Vulnerable Limosa lapponica
    [Show full text]
  • Tendrils November 2018 Issue 7
    Tendrils Newsletter Issue 7, November 2018 Tendrils Australian Botanical Artists Regional Network (ABARN) Some local NSW Southern Highlands wattles: (L-R) Acacia jonesii, Acacia dorothea (both uncommon) & Acacia melanoxylon News from Regional Groups Nine paintings for our Florilegium of Threatened Species of the NSW Southern Highlands, were NSW featured in the exhibition and generated much BDAS Botanic Artists public interest. Lauren Hook from the NSW Office of by Cathryn Coutts Environment and Heritage officially opened the The second For The Love of Plants exhibition exhibition. and workshops event was held this year at Bowral Art Gallery, from October 19-30. Five workshops were held over the two weekends. We thank tutors, Helen Fitzgerald, Susannah Blaxill, Rita Parkinson, Peter Wale and Jacqueline Donovan for their expert tuition, patience and encouragement of the students. There were 86 paintings in the exhibition, and sales of works were pleasing. Gallery visitors were also keen to buy the Botanical Art Society of Australia (BASA) publication, Flora of Australia, showing Australian paintings from the Botanical Art Worldwide Exhibition in May Lauren Hook at the exhibition opening 2018. Copies are still available from BASA. We thank Lauren for her support. In her opening remarks, she also thanked many local groups on 1 Tendrils Newsletter Issue 7, November 2018 our behalf, for their support of the project, including: local landowners, Wingecarribee Shire Council staff, bush-care volunteers, Australian Plant Society Southern Highlands group, local experts, field naturalists and NSW National Parks and Wildlife staff. Visitors commented that it was a powerful and thought-provoking experience to see the paintings of the individual plants (some of which are very small in life size) displayed as a group.
    [Show full text]
  • Jervis Bay Territory Page 1 of 50 21-Jan-11 Species List for NRM Region (Blank), Jervis Bay Territory
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Indigenous Plants of Bendigo
    Produced by Indigenous Plants of Bendigo Indigenous Plants of Bendigo PMS 1807 RED PMS 432 GREY PMS 142 GOLD A Gardener’s Guide to Growing and Protecting Local Plants 3rd Edition 9 © Copyright City of Greater Bendigo and Bendigo Native Plant Group Inc. This work is Copyright. Apart from any use permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the City of Greater Bendigo. First Published 2004 Second Edition 2007 Third Edition 2013 Printed by Bendigo Modern Press: www.bmp.com.au This book is also available on the City of Greater Bendigo website: www.bendigo.vic.gov.au Printed on 100% recycled paper. Disclaimer “The information contained in this publication is of a general nature only. This publication is not intended to provide a definitive analysis, or discussion, on each issue canvassed. While the Committee/Council believes the information contained herein is correct, it does not accept any liability whatsoever/howsoever arising from reliance on this publication. Therefore, readers should make their own enquiries, and conduct their own investigations, concerning every issue canvassed herein.” Front cover - Clockwise from centre top: Bendigo Wax-flower (Pam Sheean), Hoary Sunray (Marilyn Sprague), Red Ironbark (Pam Sheean), Green Mallee (Anthony Sheean), Whirrakee Wattle (Anthony Sheean). Table of contents Acknowledgements ...............................................2 Foreword..........................................................3 Introduction.......................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • Life Cycle and Host Range of Phycita Sp. Rejected for Biological Control of Prickly Acacia in Australia † K
    J. Appl. Entomol. ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION Life cycle and host range of Phycita sp. rejected for biological control of prickly acacia in Australia † K. Dhileepan1, C. J. Lockett1,A.Balu2, S. Murugesan2, D. J. Perovic1, & D. B. J. Taylor1 1 Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Ecosciences Precinct, Biosecurity Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia 2 Institute of Forest Genetics and Tree Breeding, Coimbatore, India Keywords Abstract biological control, field host range, host specificity, leaf webber, non-target risk, Prickly acacia (Vachellia nilotica subsp. indica), a native of the Indian sub- Phycitinae continent, is a serious weed of the grazing areas of northern Australia and is a target for classical biological control. Native range surveys in India Correspondence identified a leaf webber, Phycita sp. (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) as a prospec- Kunjithapatham Dhileepan (corresponding tive biological control agent for prickly acacia. In this study, we report the author), Department of Agriculture and life cycle and host-specificity test results Phycita sp. and highlight the con- Fisheries, Biosecurity Queensland, Ecosciences Precinct, Dutton Park, QLD 4102, tradictory results between the no-choice tests in India and Australia and Australia. E-mail: [email protected] the field host range in India. In no-choice tests in India and Australia, Phy- cita sp. completed development on two of 11 and 16 of 27 non-target test †Current address: Fujian Agriculture and plant species, respectively. Although Phycita sp. fed and completed devel- Forestry University Fuzhou, Fujian, China opment on two non-target test plant species (Vachellia planifrons and V. leucophloea) in no-choice tests in India, there was no evidence of the Received: October 9, 2014; accepted: insect on the two non-target test plant species in the field.
    [Show full text]