DOCSLIB.ORG

Department of Defense Appropriations Bill, 2021

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Department of Defense Appropriations Bill, 2021 1 116TH CONGRESS " ! REPORT 2d Session HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 116–453 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE APPROPRIATIONS BILL, 2021 R E P O R T OF THE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS together with MINORITY VIEWS [TO ACCOMPANY H.R. 7617] JULY 16, 2020.—Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed VerDate Sep 11 2014 12:45 Jul 17, 2020 Jkt 040847 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6012 Sfmt 6012 E:\HR\OC\HR453.XXX HR453 rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with HEARING E:\Seals\Congress.#13 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE APPROPRIATIONS BILL, 2021 VerDate Sep 11 2014 12:45 Jul 17, 2020 Jkt 040847 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6019 Sfmt 6019 E:\HR\OC\HR453.XXX HR453 rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with HEARING with DSKBCBPHB2PROD on rfrederick 1 116TH CONGRESS " ! REPORT 2d Session HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 116–453 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE APPROPRIATIONS BILL, 2021 R E P O R T OF THE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS together with MINORITY VIEWS [TO ACCOMPANY H.R. 7617] JULY 16, 2020.—Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 40–847 WASHINGTON : 2020 VerDate Sep 11 2014 12:45 Jul 17, 2020 Jkt 040847 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4012 Sfmt 4012 E:\HR\OC\HR453.XXX HR453 rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with HEARING E:\Seals\Congress.#13 VerDate Sep 11 2014 12:45 Jul 17, 2020 Jkt 040847 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4012 Sfmt 4012 E:\HR\OC\HR453.XXX HR453 rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with HEARING CONTENTS Page Bill Totals ................................................................................................................. 1 Committee Budget Review Process ........................................................................ 3 Introduction .............................................................................................................. 3 Definition of Program, Project, and Activity ......................................................... 5 Reprogramming Guidance for Base and Overseas Contingency Operations Funding ................................................................................................................. 5 Funding Increases ................................................................................................... 6 Congressional Special Interest Items ..................................................................... 6 Designated Congressional Special Interest Items ................................................. 6 General Transfer Authority and Special Transfer Authority .............................. 7 Classified Annex ...................................................................................................... 8 Committee Recommendations by Major Category ................................................ 8 Active, Reserve, and National Guard Military Personnel ................................ 8 Operation and Maintenance ................................................................................ 8 Procurement ......................................................................................................... 8 Research, Development, Test and Evaluation ................................................... 9 Defense Health Program ..................................................................................... 10 Overseas Contingency Operations/Global War on Terrorism Requirements .. 10 Civilian Cyber Workforce ........................................................................................ 10 Initiating Operations ............................................................................................... 11 Coronavirus Disease 2019 ....................................................................................... 11 Domestic Manufacturing Requirements for Navy Shipbuilding .......................... 13 Littoral Combat Ship Decommissions .................................................................... 13 Compliance with Congressionally Directed Reports ............................................. 14 Buy America and the Berry Amendment .............................................................. 14 Renaming Institutions ............................................................................................. 14 Law Enforcement Training ..................................................................................... 15 TITLE I. MILITARY PERSONNEL ....................................................................... 17 Military Personnel Overview .............................................................................. 19 Summary of End Strength .................................................................................. 19 Overall Active End Strength ............................................................................... 19 Overall Selected Reserve End Strength ............................................................. 19 Reprogramming Guidance for Military Personnel Accounts ............................ 20 (Including Base and Overseas Contingency Operations Funding) ............... Military Personnel Special Interest Items ......................................................... 20 Minority Outreach and Officer Accessions ......................................................... 20 Recognizing Diversity in the Military ................................................................ 21 Cultural Sensitivity Training .............................................................................. 21 Trauma Training Program .................................................................................. 21 Sexual Assault Prevention and Response .......................................................... 22 Suicide Prevention and Outreach ....................................................................... 23 Military Personnel, Army .................................................................................... 24 Military Personnel, Navy .................................................................................... 28 Cybersecurity Professionals ............................................................................. 32 Military Personnel, Marine Corps ...................................................................... 32 Military Personnel, Air Force .............................................................................. 36 Reserve Personnel, Army .................................................................................... 40 Reserve Personnel, Navy ..................................................................................... 43 Reserve Personnel, Marine Corps ....................................................................... 46 Reserve Personnel, Air Force .............................................................................. 49 National Guard Personnel, Army ....................................................................... 52 National Guard Personnel, Air Force ................................................................. 55 TITLE II. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE ................................................... 59 Reprogramming Guidance for Operation and Maintenance Accounts ............. 61 (Including Base and Overseas Contingency Operations Funding) ............... Reprogramming Guidance for Special Operations Command .......................... 62 Operation and Maintenance Special Interest Items ......................................... 62 (III) VerDate Sep 11 2014 12:45 Jul 17, 2020 Jkt 040847 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 E:\HR\OC\HR453.XXX HR453 rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with HEARING IV Page Quarterly Operation and Maintenance Updates ............................................... 63 Restoring Readiness ............................................................................................. 63 Reclaimed Refrigerants ....................................................................................... 63 Meals Ready-To-Eat War Reserve ...................................................................... 63 Advertising ........................................................................................................... 63 Minority and Women-Owned Businesses ........................................................... 64 Classified Contracting for Small Businesses ..................................................... 64 Pilot Shortages ..................................................................................................... 64 Military Funeral Honors ..................................................................................... 65 Body Composition Testing ................................................................................... 65 Inventory Management ....................................................................................... 65 Language Flagship Program ............................................................................... 65 Military Food Transformation ............................................................................. 66 Vieques and Culebra ............................................................................................ 67 Indian Financing Act ........................................................................................... 67 PFOS/PFOA Exposure Assessment .................................................................... 68 Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances Cleanup Cost Reporting ........................ 68 Childcare ............................................................................................................... 69 Movement of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Case #2 United States of America (Respondent)
    Model International Court of Justice (MICJ) Case #2 United States of America (Respondent) Relocation of the United States Embassy to Jerusalem (Palestine v. United States of America) Arkansas Model United Nations (AMUN) November 20-21, 2020 Teeter 1 Historical Context For years, there has been a consistent struggle between the State of Israel and the State of Palestine led by the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO). In 2018, United States Secretary of State Mike Pompeo announced that the U.S. embassy located in Tel Aviv would be moving to the city of Jerusalem.1 Palestine, angered by the embassy moving, filed a case with the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in 2018.2 The history of this case, U.S. relations with Israel and Palestine, current events, and why the ICJ should side with the United States will be covered in this research paper. Israel and Palestine have an interesting relationship between war and competition. In 1948, Israel captured the west side of Jerusalem, and the Palestinians captured the east side during the Arab-Israeli War. Israel declared its independence on May 14, 1948. In 1949, the Lausanne Conference took place, and the UN came to the decision for “corpus separatum” which split Jerusalem into a Jewish zone and an Arab zone.3 At this time, the State of Israel decided that Jerusalem was its “eternal capital.”4 “Corpus separatum,” is a Latin term meaning “a city or region which is given a special legal and political status different from its environment, but which falls short of being sovereign, or an independent city-state.”5 1 Office of the President, 82 Recognizing Jerusalem as the Capital of the State of Israel and Relocating the United States Embassy to Israel to Jerusalem § (2017).
    [Show full text]
  • The History and Politics of Defense Reviews
    C O R P O R A T I O N The History and Politics of Defense Reviews Raphael S. Cohen For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR2278 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-0-8330-9973-0 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2018 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface The 1993 Bottom-Up Review starts with this challenge: “Now that the Cold War is over, the questions we face in the Department of Defense are: How do we structure the armed forces of the United States for the future? How much defense is enough in the post–Cold War era?”1 Finding a satisfactory answer to these deceptively simple questions not only motivated the Bottom-Up Review but has arguably animated defense strategy for the past quarter century.
    [Show full text]
  • Defense Media Awards Nomination Guidance for Calendar Year 2020
    MEMORANDUM FOR CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER/G-6, HEADQUARTERS, DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY SECRETARY OF THE ARMY, CHIEF OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS SECRETARY OF THE NAVY, CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF U.S. MARINE CORPS COMMUNICATION, HEADQUARTERS MARINE CORPS CHIEF OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, U.S. COAST GUARD SUBJECT: Request for Nominations to the 2020 Defense Media Awards This memorandum is the call for nominations to the 2020 Defense Media Awards. Attached is the fifth iteration of the DoD-level awards program guidance designed by your designated public affairs and visual information representatives. There are no significant changes to this year’s nomination criteria. The number of categories remains at nine: Defense Communicator of the Year, Civilian and Military Graphic Designer of the Year, Civilian and Military Videographer of the Year, Civilian and Military Photographer of the Year, the Thomas Jefferson Civilian Print Journalist of the Year and the Thomas Jefferson Military Print Journalist of the Year. Each Service may submit one nomination for each category. Submit nominations in accordance with the attached guidance no later than March 29, 2021. If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Chad McMeen at (301) 677-2042 or [email protected]. Thank you for your support. Paul R. Haverstick, Jr. Colonel, U.S. Army Acting Director Attachment: As stated Defense Media Awards Nomination Guidance for Calendar Year 2020 Defense Media Activity 6700 Taylor Ave. Fort George G. Meade, MD 20755 [email protected] Defense Media Awards Nomination Guidance for Calendar Year 2020 Table of Contents I.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Air and Ground Conventional Forces for NATO: Mobility and Logistics Issues
    BACKGROUND PAPER U.S. Air and Ground Conventional Forces for NATO: Mobility and Logistics Issues March 1978 Congress of the United States Congressional Budget Office Washington, D.C. U.S. AIR AND GROUND CONVENTIONAL FORCES FOR NATO: MOBILITY AND LOGISTICS ISSUES The Congress of the United States Congressional Budget Office For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Qovernment Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 FT II PREFACE The defense budget that the Congress will be considering in fiscal year 1979 places a strong emphasis on improving U.S. conventional forces for NATO. U.S. decisions concerning air and ground conventional forces for NATO are, however, tied closely to, and must be assessed in terms of, the capabilities of our NATO allies. This paper outlines the increasing importance of mobility and logistics in NATO defense. It compares U.S. and allied capabilities in those areas and presents options regarding U.S. decisions on logistics and mobility. The paper is part of a CBO series on the U.S. military role in NATO. Other papers in this series are U.S. Air and Ground Conventional Forces for NATO: Overview (January 1978),Assessing the NATO/Warsaw Pact Military Balance"" (December 1977), and two forthcoming, background papers, Air Defense Issues and Firepower Issues. This series was under- taken at the request of the Senate Budget Committee. In accord- ance with CBO's mandate to provide objective analysis, the study offers no recommendations. This paper was prepared by Peggy L. Weeks and Alice C. Maroni of the National Security and International Affairs Division of the Congressional Budget Office, under the supervision of John E.
    [Show full text]
  • ATLAS SUPPORTED: Strengthening U.S.-Israel Strategic Cooperation
    ATLAS SUPPORTED: Strengthening U.S.-Israel Strategic Cooperation JINSA’s Gemunder Center U.S.-Israel Security Task Force Chairman Admiral James Stavridis, USN (ret.) May 2018 DISCLAIMER The findings and recommendations contained in this publication are solely those of the authors. Task Force and Staff Chairman Admiral James Stavridis, USN (ret.) Former NATO Supreme Allied Commander and former Commander of U.S. European Command Members General Charles Wald, USAF (ret.) Former Deputy Commander of U.S. European Command LTG John Gardner, USA (ret.) Former Deputy Commander of U.S. European Command Lt Gen Henry Obering, USAF (ret.) Former Director of U.S. Missile Defense Agency JINSA Gemunder Center Staff Michael Makovsky, PhD President & CEO Harry Hoshovsky Policy Analyst Jonathan Ruhe Associate Director Table of Contents Executive Summary 7 Strategic Overview 17 Growing Iranian threat to the Middle East 18 Israel’s vital role in defending mutual interests 19 New opportunities for U.S.-led regional defense 20 Recommendations 21 Elevate Israel’s official standing as an ally to that of Australia 21 Frontload the MoU to ensure Israel’s qualitative military edge (QME) 26 Replenish and regionalize prepositioned munitions stockpiles in Israel 28 Drive Israeli-Arab regional security cooperation 29 Support Israel’s legitimate security needs against the Iranian threat in Syria 33 Develop new frontiers for bilateral military cooperation and R&D 35 Endnotes 37 I. Executive Summary “Beautiful,” is how Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu recently described the relationship between the United States and Israel, two liberal democratic countries which acutely share many values and security interests. The United States recognized the State of Israel minutes after the Jewish state was established 70 years ago this month, but a bilateral strategic partnership only began several decades later during the height of the Cold War.
    [Show full text]
  • 13.1. for COMPONENT ASSIGNMENTS. CMD Will Use The
    13.1. FOR COMPONENT ASSIGNMENTS. CMD will use the digraphs and trigraphs in Table 26 for the DoD and OSD Component heads, as appropriate, when assigning actions in CATMS, in suspense reports, and on the SD Form 391. Questions regarding them may be directed to CMD at whs.pentagon.esd.mbx.cmd- [email protected]. Table 26. Digraphs and Trigraphs for Action or Information Component Assigned OSD Entities SD Secretary of Defense (Assign Action to ES) DSD Deputy Secretary of Defense COS The Special Assistant to the Secretary and Deputy Secretary of Defense MAS Military Assistan t to the Secretary of Defense MAD Military Assistan t to the Deputy Secretary of Defense COS Chief of Staff ES Executive Secretary of the Department of Defense ESR Executive Secretariat Rear ESW Executive Secretary White House Actions PRO Protocol SDS Secretary of Defense Scheduling DS Deputy Secretary of Defense Scheduling TNT Transition T eam USA Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment URE Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering USP Under Secretary of Defense for Policy USC Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller)/Chief Financial Officer UPR Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness USI Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security CMO Chief Management Officer CIO DoD Chief Information Officer LA Assistant Secretary of Defense for Legislative Affairs PA Assistant to the Secretary of Defense for Public Affairs GC General Counsel of the Department of Defense OTE Director of Operational Test and Evaluation CAP Director, Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation IG Inspector General of the Department of Defense NA Director of Net Assessment Military Departments SA Secretary of the Army SAF Secretary of the Air Force SN Secretary of the Navy SECTION 13: OFFICIAL DIGRAPHS AND TRIGRAPHS 86 DoDM 5110.04, Volume 1, June 16, 2020 Table 26.
    [Show full text]
  • DEPARTMENT of DEFENSE the Pentagon 20301–1155, Phone (703) 545–6700 Fax 695–3362/693–2161
    DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE The Pentagon 20301–1155, phone (703) 545–6700 fax 695–3362/693–2161, http://www.defenselink.mil ROBERT M. GATES, Secretary of Defense; born in Wichita, KS, September 25, 1943; education: B.A., College of William and Mary, 1965; M.A., Indiana University, 1966; Ph.D., Georgetown University, 1974; military service: U.S. Air Force, 1967–69, served as an officer in the Strategic Air Command; professional: intelligence analyst, Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), 1966–74; staff, National Security Council, 1974–79; Director, DCA/DDCI Executive Staff, CIA, 1981–82; Deputy Director for Intelligence, CIA, 1982–86; Chair, National Intel- ligence Council, 1983–86; Deputy Director of Central Intelligence, CIA, 1986–89; Deputy Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs, CIA, 1989; Assistant to the President and Deputy for National Security Affairs, CIA, 1989–91; Director, CIA, 1991–93; private consultant; author, From the Shadows: The Ultimate Insider’s Story of Five Presidents and How They Won the Cold War, 1996; interim Dean of the George Bush School of Government and Public Service, Texas A & M University, 1999–2001; President, Texas A & M University, 2002–07; President, National Eagle Scout Association; awards: National Security Medal; Presi- dential Citizens Medal; National Intelligence Distinguished Service Medal; Distinguished Intel- ligence Medal; family: married to Becky; two children; nominated by President George W. Bush to become the 22nd Secretary of Defense, and was confirmed by the U.S. Senate on December 6, 2006. OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY Pentagon, Room 3E880, 20301–1000, phone (703) 692–7100, fax 697–8339 Secretary of Defense.—Robert M.
    [Show full text]
  • Strengthening US-Israel Strategic Cooperation
    ATLAS SUPPORTED: Strengthening U.S.-Israel Strategic Cooperation JINSA’s Gemunder Center U.S.-Israel Security Task Force Chairman Admiral James Stavridis, USN (ret.) May 2018 DISCLAIMER This report is a product of JINSA’s Gemunder Center U.S.-Israel Security Task Force. The findings expressed herein are those solely of the Task Force. The report does not necessarily represent the views or opinions of JINSA, its founders or its board of directors. Task Force and Staff Chairman Admiral James Stavridis, USN (ret.) Former NATO Supreme Allied Commander and former Commander of U.S. European Command Members General Charles Wald, USAF (ret.) Former Deputy Commander of U.S. European Command LTG John Gardner, USA (ret.) Former Deputy Commander of U.S. European Command Lt Gen Henry Obering, USAF (ret.) Former Director of U.S. Missile Defense Agency JINSA Gemunder Center Staff Michael Makovsky, PhD President & CEO Harry Hoshovsky Policy Analyst Jonathan Ruhe Associate Director Table of Contents Executive Summary 7 Strategic Overview 17 Growing Iranian threat to the Middle East 18 Israel’s vital role in defending mutual interests 19 New opportunities for U.S.-led regional defense 20 Recommendations 21 Elevate Israel’s official standing as an ally to that of Australia 21 Frontload the MoU to ensure Israel’s qualitative military edge (QME) 26 Replenish and regionalize prepositioned munitions stockpiles in Israel 28 Drive Israeli-Arab regional security cooperation 29 Support Israel’s legitimate security needs against the Iranian threat in Syria 33 Develop new frontiers for bilateral military cooperation and R&D 35 Endnotes 37 I. Executive Summary “Beautiful,” is how Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu recently described the relationship between the United States and Israel, two liberal democratic countries which acutely share many values and security interests.
    [Show full text]
  • Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 President's Budget
    Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 President’s Budget Operation and Maintenance, Defense-Wide Defense Media Activity March 2019 (This page intentionally left blank) Defense Media Activity Operation and Maintenance, Defense-Wide Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 President’s Budget Operation and Maintenance, Defense-Wide Summary ($ in thousands) Budget Activity (BA) 4: Administrative and Service-wide Activities FY 2018 Price Program FY 2019 Price Program FY 2020 Actuals Change Change Enacted Change Change Estimate DMA 230,734 3,254 -16,984 217,004 2,847 -17,059 202,792 * The FY 2018 Actual column includes $13,255.0 thousand of FY 2018 Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO) Appropriations Funding (PL 115-141). * The FY 2019 Enacted column excludes $14,377.0 thousand of FY 2019 OCO Appropriations Funding (PL 115-245). * The FY 2020 Estimate column excludes $14,377.0 thousand of FY 2020 OCO Appropriations Funding. I. Description of Operations Financed: The Defense Media Activity (DMA) is the Department of Defense (DoD) internal news and media production organization with the mission of supporting public affairs (internal communications) operations of the Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD) and each of the Military Departments by gathering information on DoD policies, messages, programs and priorities and delivering it to the DoD worldwide military audience – active, reserve, civilian and contractors, and including their families, on land and at sea. DMA preserves the DoD’s visual information records, including Combat Camera images, makes them available to support military operations and to the public, and provides them to the National Archives and Records Administration in accordance with federal law.
    [Show full text]
  • Stratvocate Ccinsight
    Stratvocate ccInsight Customers DoD Defense Contract Management Agency Defense Contract Management Agency / DCMA AQ Defense Contract Management Agency / DCMA General Dynamics Defense Systems (Pittsfield) Defense Contract Management Agency / DCMA Hartford Defense Contract Management Agency / DCMA Lockheed Martin Sunnyvale Defense Contract Management Agency / Defense Contract Management Agency East (DCMAE) Top Level / DCMA NSSO Lockheed Martin, Mitchel Field, NY Defense Information Systems Agency DISA PLD-Washington D.C. / White House Communications Agency Procurement Directorate / DITCO-Europe Procurement Directorate / DITCO-NCR Procurement Directorate / DITCO-NCR PL64 Special Projects Procurement Directorate / DITCO-Pacific Procurement Directorate / DITCO-Scott Procurement Directorate / DITCO-Scott JITC Defense Logistics Agency DLA Acquisition Locations / Defense Media Center DLA Acquisition Locations / DLA Aviation DLA Acquisition Locations / DLA Aviation - BSM DLA Acquisition Locations / DLA Aviation - Huntsville DLA Acquisition Locations / DLA Aviation - Philadelphia Detachment DLA Acquisition Locations / DLA Contracting Services Office DLA Acquisition Locations / DLA Contracting Services Office - Battle Creek DLA Acquisition Locations / DLA Contracting Services Office - Columbus DLA Acquisition Locations / DLA Contracting Services Office - Energy DLA Acquisition Locations / DLA Contracting Services Office - Philadelphia DLA Acquisition Locations / DLA Contracting Services Office - Philadelphia - BSM DLA Acquisition Locations / DLA
    [Show full text]
  • Organization of the Department of Defense (Dod)
    Organization of the Department of Defense Department of Defense (DoD) Secretary of Defense Office of the Inspector General of the Department of Defense Office of the Department of Department of Department of Joint Chiefs Secretary of Defense the Army the Navy the Air Force of Staff Deputy Secretary of Secretary of the Army Secretary of the Navy Secretary of the Air Force Chairman of the Defense, Under Joint Chiefs of Staff Office Office Office Office Secretaries of Head- of the of the of the of the Defense, Assistant The quarters The The The Secretary Chief Secretary Secretary Secretaries of Army Staff Marine Air Staff Joint Chiefs Joint Staff of the of Naval of the of the Defense, and other Corps Army Operations Navy Air Force specified officials The The The The Marine Army Navy Air Force Corps Defense Agencies (17) DoD Field Activities (10) Combatant Commands (9) Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency Defense Media Activity Africa Command Defense Commissary Agency Defense POW/Missing Personnel Office Central Command Defense Contract Audit Agency Defense Technical Information Center European Command Defense Contract Management Agency * Defense Technology Security Administration Northern Command Defense Finance and Accounting Service DoD Education Activity Pacific Command Defense Information Systems Agency * DoD Human Resources Activity Southern Command Defense Intelligence Agency * DoD Test Resource Management Center Special Operations Command Defense Legal Services Agency Office of Economic Adjustment Strategic Command Defense Logistics
    [Show full text]
  • Fiscal Year 2009 Budget Estimates DEFENSE MEDIA ACTIVITY
    Fiscal Year 2009 Budget Estimates DEFENSE MEDIA ACTIVITY February 2008 (This page intentionally left blank.) DEFENSE MEDIA ACTIVITY (DMA) Operation and Maintenance, Defense-Wide Fiscal Year (FY) 2009 Budget Estimates Operation and Maintenance, Defense-Wide Summary ($ in thousands) Budget Activity (BA) 4: Administrative and Service-wide Activities FY 2007 Price Program FY 2008 Price Program FY 2009 Actuals Change Change Estimate Change Change Estimate Defense Media Activity 167,849 3,352 -23,616 147,585 3,209 63,014 213,808 * The FY 2007 Actual column includes $18,785.0 thousand of FY 2007 Global War on Terror (GWOT) Emergency Supplemental funds (PL 110- 28) and $149,064.0 thousand of the American Forces Information Service (AFIS) funds. Figures exclude military service funds. * The FY 2008 Estimate column excludes $9,300.0 thousand of FY 2008 Consolidated Appropriations Act funding. Figures exclude military service funds. I. Description of Operations Financed: The Defense Media Agency (DMA) is the DoD's direct line of communication for news and information to U.S Forces deployed world-wide, on land, sea and air. The DMA operates in a complex, fast paced news environment and strives to be the most comprehensive source of information to U.S. Forces anywhere in the world. The DMA trains public affairs professionals and presents news, information, and entertainment through media outlets including radio, TV, internet and print media to the DoD and the public at large. DoD-Wide Support: The DMA provides information outlets and products, in peace and war that are viewed through the American Forces Press Service, American Forces Radio/Television Service, Web Specials/DefenseLink, Pentagon Channel, Early Bird, and Stars & Stripes newspaper.
    [Show full text]