DOCSLIB.ORG

Existing Conditions and Potential Environmental Effects

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Existing Conditions and Potential Environmental Effects California North Coast Offshore Wind Studies Existing Conditions and Potential Environmental Effects This report was prepared by H.T. Harvey & Associates. It is part of the California North Coast Offshore Wind Studies collection, edited by Mark Severy, Zachary Alva, Gregory Chapman, Maia Cheli, Tanya Garcia, Christina Ortega, Nicole Salas, Amin Younes, James Zoellick, & Arne Jacobson, and published by the Schatz Energy Research Center in September 2020. The series is available online at schatzcenter.org/wind/ Schatz Energy Research Center Humboldt State University Arcata, CA 95521 | (707) 826-4345 California North Coast Offshore Wind Studies Disclaimer This project was funded by the California Natural Resources Agency, Ocean Protection Council. The content does not represent the official views of policies of the State of California. This report was created under agreement #C0304300 About the Schatz Energy Research Center The Schatz Energy Research Center at Humboldt State University advances clean and renewable energy. Our projects aim to reduce climate change and pollution while increasing energy access and resilience. Our work is collaborative and multidisciplinary, and we are grateful to the many partners who together make our efforts possible. Learn more about our work at schatzcenter.org Rights and Permissions The material in this work is subject to copyright. Please cite as follows: H.T. Harvey & Associates (2020). Existing Conditions and Potential Environmental Effects. In M. Severy, Z. Alva, G. Chapman, M. Cheli, T. Garcia, C. Ortega, N. Salas, A. Younes, J. Zoellick, & A. Jacobson (Eds.) California North Coast Offshore Wind Studies. Humboldt, CA: Schatz Energy Research Center. schatzcenter.org/pubs/2020-OSW-R13.pdf. All images remain the sole property of their source and may not be used for any purpose without written permission from that source. Existing Conditions and Potential Environmental Effects ii California North Coast Offshore Wind Studies Executive Summary In support for the North Coast Offshore Wind Feasibility Project, funded by the California Ocean Protection Council (OPC), this document provides an inventory of existing conditions and evaluates the potential effects of the project scenarios developed by Humboldt State University (HSU) and Mott MacDonald. These project scenarios (also referred to as the proposed action) represent different combinations of project scales and locations, as presented briefly below. The goal of this document is to inform the evaluation of project scenario feasibility and support future regulatory and permitting efforts. The North Coast Offshore Wind Feasibility Project assesses two offshore wind farm locations with multiple build-out scenarios that differ in project size and the associated number of 12 MW turbines. The offshore wind farm locations consist of offshore Humboldt Bay (HB), which coincides with the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management’s Northern California Call Area, and the hypothetical Cape Mendocino area (CM). For HB, there are three project size scenarios: 50 MW (four turbines), 150 MW (12 turbines), and 1800 MW (153 turbines). At CM, there are two project size scenarios (150 MW and 1800 MW). Both locations would require the installation and operation of an export cable to convey the electricity to the shore cable landfall at the South Spit of Humboldt Bay. The segment of export cable between the South Spit cable landfall and the Humboldt Bay Substation would be installed using horizontal directional drilling under the bay. All of the project scenarios would involve infrastructure improvements to the Humboldt Bay port. These improvements would include upgrades to Redwood Marine Terminal 1 and adjacent lands to support project construction and maintenance; potential changes to the timing and frequency of dredging within Humboldt Bay, and the potential addition of areas to be dredged in the bay. Power generated by the offshore wind farms will likely need to be distributed out of the area by overland transmission line route upgrades from the Humboldt Bay Substation to the east or south, or by a subsea cable route that extends south from the offshore wind farms to the San Francisco Bay area. All of the project scenarios (proposed action) would entail construction, operations and maintenance, and decommissioning that would result in effects on the marine and terrestrial environments. The potential short- term effects on the marine environment that would be associated with construction include: (1) disturbance of benthic habitat; (2) changes in water quality from sedimentation or contaminants; (3) increase in ambient acoustic levels underwater; (4) increase in the risk for vessel collisions with wildlife; and (5) wildlife disturbance from the use of artificial lighting (e.g., on decks or underwater). The potential longer-term effects associated with operations and maintenance include: (1) operational noise of turbines and maintenance vessels; (2) seabird and bat collision/avoidance with rotating turbine blades; (3) marine mammal interactions with underwater structure (e.g., cetacean collision or entanglement with lost fishing gear); (4) habitat changes associated with structure in the water column and on the seafloor; (5) perching and haul-out effects; and (6) electromagnetic field transmissions from the interarray cables, offshore substation, and export cable (see table below). The potential effects on the terrestrial environment associated with the transmission line upgrades include: (1) disturbance of threatened or endangered wildlife species from the noise associated with horizontal directional Existing Conditions and Potential Environmental Effects iii California North Coast Offshore Wind Studies drilling and transmission line improvements; (2) removal of threatened or endangered plant species or sensitive natural communities during ground-disturbing activities; (3) loss of wildlife habitat (vegetation clearing); (3) hydrological interruption or the placement of fill in jurisdictional water bodies; (4) increased long-term risk of bird collision with transmission lines improvements; and (5) the introduction and spread of terrestrial invasive plant species (see table below). The following are the key findings of this study. • The potential effects of onshore and offshore construction will mostly be short-term and localized with opportunities for mitigation; however, major changes to existing habitat in Humboldt Bay (e.g., larger docks, dredging to increase channel size/depth beyond current channel configuration) will be a challenge to permit. • The potential effects associated with the offshore project operations and maintenance will likely be an ongoing, long-term concern, primarily due to greater uncertainties about interactions with seabirds and marine mammals that may require extensive monitoring and adaptive management; these potential effects are scaled to project size and scenario. • The long, linear improvements to existing overland transmission lines will also result in long-term effects on multiple terrestrial and freshwater biota and habitats, including those subject to state and federal regulations. Permitting challenges are scaled to project size/scenario due to greater environmental uncertainties and potential risks: larger scale projects will not only affect a larger offshore footprint, but will include long terrestrial transmission line improvements that potentially affect a large number of threatened or endangered species and natural communities (e.g., wetlands and other waters). In addition, there are differences in the applicable regulatory agencies between the east and south transmission routes1. Potential environmental effects associated with the installation and operation of a subsea transmission cable to the south and from Cape Mendocino to Humboldt Bay are not well understood when compared to the terrestrial transmission line improvements, and will require more extensive surveys to narrow down the cable route and improve understanding of environmental risks and permitting challenges. The routes for the export cables and the subsea transmission cable should avoid marine geological features (e.g., submarine canyons, faults), protected marine areas (e.g., Marine Protected Areas), and (where feasible) rocky or hard substrates, to minimize effects. 1 The east route intersects with the jurisdictions of the North Coast and Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Boards (RWQCBs) and two U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Districts: San Francisco and Sacramento. The south route occurs within the jurisdictions of the North Coast RWQCB and the San Francisco USACE District. Existing Conditions and Potential Environmental Effects iv California North Coast Offshore Wind Studies Summary of Offshore Wind Alternative Build-Out Scenario Stressors and their Relative Potential Risks to the Marine, Humboldt Bay, and Terrestrial Environment Small Build-Out Scenario Medium Build-Out Commercial Build-Out Stressor -50 MW Scenario -150 MW Scenario -1800 MW Marine Environment Rotating Blades (seabird and bat collision) Mooring and Interarray Cables (cetacean collision or entanglement) Acoustic (marine mammal behavior) Habitat Change (benthic and pelagic invertebrates, fish) EMF (fish and invertebrate behavior) Water Quality (contaminants, increased turbidity from sediments) Humboldt Bay Dock Improvements (eelgrass, fish, marine mammals) Dredging (habitat, acoustic, water quality) Vessels (acoustic, collision, nonnative aquatic species, bird disturbance
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Vascular Plants at Fort Ross State Historic Park
    19005 Coast Highway One, Jenner, CA 95450 ■ 707.847.3437 ■ [email protected] ■ www.fortross.org Title: Vascular Plants at Fort Ross State Historic Park Author(s): Dorothy Scherer Published by: California Native Plant Society i Source: Fort Ross Conservancy Library URL: www.fortross.org Fort Ross Conservancy (FRC) asks that you acknowledge FRC as the source of the content; if you use material from FRC online, we request that you link directly to the URL provided. If you use the content offline, we ask that you credit the source as follows: “Courtesy of Fort Ross Conservancy, www.fortross.org.” Fort Ross Conservancy, a 501(c)(3) and California State Park cooperating association, connects people to the history and beauty of Fort Ross and Salt Point State Parks. © Fort Ross Conservancy, 19005 Coast Highway One, Jenner, CA 95450, 707-847-3437 .~ ) VASCULAR PLANTS of FORT ROSS STATE HISTORIC PARK SONOMA COUNTY A PLANT COMMUNITIES PROJECT DOROTHY KING YOUNG CHAPTER CALIFORNIA NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY DOROTHY SCHERER, CHAIRPERSON DECEMBER 30, 1999 ) Vascular Plants of Fort Ross State Historic Park August 18, 2000 Family Botanical Name Common Name Plant Habitat Listed/ Community Comments Ferns & Fern Allies: Azollaceae/Mosquito Fern Azo/la filiculoides Mosquito Fern wp Blechnaceae/Deer Fern Blechnum spicant Deer Fern RV mp,sp Woodwardia fimbriata Giant Chain Fern RV wp Oennstaedtiaceae/Bracken Fern Pleridium aquilinum var. pubescens Bracken, Brake CG,CC,CF mh T Oryopteridaceae/Wood Fern Athyrium filix-femina var. cyclosorum Western lady Fern RV sp,wp Dryopteris arguta Coastal Wood Fern OS op,st Dryopteris expansa Spreading Wood Fern RV sp,wp Polystichum munitum Western Sword Fern CF mh,mp Equisetaceae/Horsetail Equisetum arvense Common Horsetail RV ds,mp Equisetum hyemale ssp.affine Common Scouring Rush RV mp,sg Equisetum laevigatum Smooth Scouring Rush mp,sg Equisetum telmateia ssp.
    [Show full text]
  • Conceptual Design Documentation
    Appendix A: Conceptual Design Documentation APPENDIX A Conceptual Design Documentation June 2019 A-1 APPENDIX A: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN DOCUMENTATION The environmental analyses in the NEPA and CEQA documents for the proposed improvements at Oceano County Airport (the Airport) are based on conceptual designs prepared to provide a realistic basis for assessing their environmental consequences. 1. Widen runway from 50 to 60 feet 2. Widen Taxiways A, A-1, A-2, A-3, and A-4 from 20 to 25 feet 3. Relocate segmented circle and wind cone 4. Installation of taxiway edge lighting 5. Installation of hold position signage 6. Installation of a new electrical vault and connections 7. Installation of a pollution control facility (wash rack) CIVIL ENGINEERING CALCULATIONS The purpose of this conceptual design effort is to identify the amount of impervious surface, grading (cut and fill) and drainage implications of the projects identified above. The conceptual design calculations detailed in the following figures indicate that Projects 1 and 2, widening the runways and taxiways would increase the total amount of impervious surface on the Airport by 32,016 square feet, or 0.73 acres; a 6.6 percent increase in the Airport’s impervious surface area. Drainage patterns would remain the same as both the runway and taxiways would continue to sheet flow from their centerlines to the edge of pavement and then into open, grassed areas. The existing drainage system is able to accommodate the modest increase in stormwater runoff that would occur, particularly as soil conditions on the Airport are conducive to infiltration. Figure A-1 shows the locations of the seven projects incorporated in the Proposed Action.
    [Show full text]
  • State of New York City's Plants 2018
    STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 Daniel Atha & Brian Boom © 2018 The New York Botanical Garden All rights reserved ISBN 978-0-89327-955-4 Center for Conservation Strategy The New York Botanical Garden 2900 Southern Boulevard Bronx, NY 10458 All photos NYBG staff Citation: Atha, D. and B. Boom. 2018. State of New York City’s Plants 2018. Center for Conservation Strategy. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY. 132 pp. STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 INTRODUCTION 10 DOCUMENTING THE CITY’S PLANTS 10 The Flora of New York City 11 Rare Species 14 Focus on Specific Area 16 Botanical Spectacle: Summer Snow 18 CITIZEN SCIENCE 20 THREATS TO THE CITY’S PLANTS 24 NEW YORK STATE PROHIBITED AND REGULATED INVASIVE SPECIES FOUND IN NEW YORK CITY 26 LOOKING AHEAD 27 CONTRIBUTORS AND ACKNOWLEGMENTS 30 LITERATURE CITED 31 APPENDIX Checklist of the Spontaneous Vascular Plants of New York City 32 Ferns and Fern Allies 35 Gymnosperms 36 Nymphaeales and Magnoliids 37 Monocots 67 Dicots 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report, State of New York City’s Plants 2018, is the first rankings of rare, threatened, endangered, and extinct species of what is envisioned by the Center for Conservation Strategy known from New York City, and based on this compilation of The New York Botanical Garden as annual updates thirteen percent of the City’s flora is imperiled or extinct in New summarizing the status of the spontaneous plant species of the York City. five boroughs of New York City. This year’s report deals with the City’s vascular plants (ferns and fern allies, gymnosperms, We have begun the process of assessing conservation status and flowering plants), but in the future it is planned to phase in at the local level for all species.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide on Common, Herbaceous, Hydrophytic Vegetation of Southern Texas
    United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service Technical Note No: TX-PM-20-02 July 2020 A Guide on Common, Herbaceous, Hydrophytic Vegetation of Southern Texas Plant Materials Technical Note Horsetail Background: Wetlands are those lands that have saturated soils, shallow standing water or flooding during at least a portion of the growing season. These sites have soils that are saturated for at least two consecutive weeks during the growing season and support a distinct vegetation type adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. Purpose: The purpose of this Technical Note is to provide information on the use of some common wetland plants of southern Texas. The list includes plants found along the Guadalupe River around Tivoli southward to the Rio Grande River floodplain. It is not intended to be a comprehensive treatment of the wetland flora of this region. Rather it is intended to introduce to the reader the many common wetland plant species that occur in south Texas. The guide is broken down into four categories: wildlife habitat, shoreline erosion control, water quality improvement and landscaping. Each species has a brief description of its identifying features, notes on its ecology or habitat, use and its National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) assessment. For more detailed information we suggest referring to our listed references. All pictures came from the USDA Plants Data Base or the E. “Kika” de la Garza Plant Materials Center. Plants for wildlife habitat: The plants listed in this section are primarily for waterbird and waterfowl habitat as well as for fish nursery and spawning areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Rockfish (Sebastes) That Are Evolutionarily Isolated Are Also
    Biological Conservation 142 (2009) 1787–1796 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Biological Conservation journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/biocon Rockfish (Sebastes) that are evolutionarily isolated are also large, morphologically distinctive and vulnerable to overfishing Karen Magnuson-Ford a,b, Travis Ingram c, David W. Redding a,b, Arne Ø. Mooers a,b,* a Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby BC, Canada V5A 1S6 b IRMACS, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby BC, Canada V5A 1S6 c Department of Zoology and Biodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia, #2370-6270 University Blvd., Vancouver, Canada V6T 1Z4 article info abstract Article history: In an age of triage, we must prioritize species for conservation effort. Species more isolated on the tree of Received 23 September 2008 life are candidates for increased attention. The rockfish genus Sebastes is speciose (>100 spp.), morpho- Received in revised form 10 March 2009 logically and ecologically diverse and many species are heavily fished. We used a complete Sebastes phy- Accepted 18 March 2009 logeny to calculate a measure of evolutionary isolation for each species and compared this to their Available online 22 April 2009 morphology and imperilment. We found that evolutionarily isolated species in the northeast Pacific are both larger-bodied and, independent of body size, morphologically more distinctive. We examined Keywords: extinction risk within rockfish using a compound measure of each species’ intrinsic vulnerability to Phylogenetic diversity overfishing and categorizing species as commercially fished or not. Evolutionarily isolated species in Extinction risk Conservation priorities the northeast Pacific are more likely to be fished, and, due to their larger sizes and to life history traits Body size such as long lifespan and slow maturation rate, they are also intrinsically more vulnerable to overfishing.
    [Show full text]
  • Mcgrath State Beach Plants 2/14/2005 7:53 PM Vascular Plants of Mcgrath State Beach, Ventura County, California by David L
    Vascular Plants of McGrath State Beach, Ventura County, California By David L. Magney Scientific Name Common Name Habit Family Abronia maritima Red Sand-verbena PH Nyctaginaceae Abronia umbellata Beach Sand-verbena PH Nyctaginaceae Allenrolfea occidentalis Iodinebush S Chenopodiaceae Amaranthus albus * Prostrate Pigweed AH Amaranthaceae Amblyopappus pusillus Dwarf Coastweed PH Asteraceae Ambrosia chamissonis Beach-bur S Asteraceae Ambrosia psilostachya Western Ragweed PH Asteraceae Amsinckia spectabilis var. spectabilis Seaside Fiddleneck AH Boraginaceae Anagallis arvensis * Scarlet Pimpernel AH Primulaceae Anemopsis californica Yerba Mansa PH Saururaceae Apium graveolens * Wild Celery PH Apiaceae Artemisia biennis Biennial Wormwood BH Asteraceae Artemisia californica California Sagebrush S Asteraceae Artemisia douglasiana Douglas' Sagewort PH Asteraceae Artemisia dracunculus Wormwood PH Asteraceae Artemisia tridentata ssp. tridentata Big Sagebrush S Asteraceae Arundo donax * Giant Reed PG Poaceae Aster subulatus var. ligulatus Annual Water Aster AH Asteraceae Astragalus pycnostachyus ssp. lanosissimus Ventura Marsh Milkvetch PH Fabaceae Atriplex californica California Saltbush PH Chenopodiaceae Atriplex lentiformis ssp. breweri Big Saltbush S Chenopodiaceae Atriplex patula ssp. hastata Arrowleaf Saltbush AH Chenopodiaceae Atriplex patula Spear Saltbush AH Chenopodiaceae Atriplex semibaccata Australian Saltbush PH Chenopodiaceae Atriplex triangularis Spearscale AH Chenopodiaceae Avena barbata * Slender Oat AG Poaceae Avena fatua * Wild
    [Show full text]
  • Suisun Marsh Fish Report 2015 Final
    native CPUE from 2014 to 2015 (Table 1). Native fishes that contributed most to 2015's value were Sacramento splittail and northern anchovy (Engraulis mordax), which offset declines in staghorn sculpin, prickly sculpin (Cottus asper), and longfin smelt CPUE from 2014 to 2015 (Table 1). In addition to anchovies, several marine fishes were captured in 2016 for which there are few records in Suisun Marsh: plainfin midshipman (Porichthys notatus), white croaker (Genyonemus lineatus), and California halibut (Paralichthys californicus; Appendix B). Figure 14. Annual otter trawl CPUE of native and non-native fishes, with important events highlighted. Table 1. Percent change in annual otter trawl CPUE of eight common marsh fishes (% increases are equivalent to percentage points, such that a 100% increase indicates that the value has doubled; species in bold are native; "all years" is the average for 1980 - 2015). Species All Years CPUE 2014 CPUE 2015 CPUE 2015/2014 % Change northern anchovy 0.03 0.01 0.20 +1900% Sacramento splittail 2.84 5.15 6.90 +34% longfin smelt 1.16 0.23 0.03 -87% staghorn sculpin 0.26 0.16 0.00 -98% prickly sculpin 1.09 0.55 0.20 -64% common carp 0.52 0.49 0.19 -61% white catfish 0.63 0.94 0.43 -54% yellowfin goby 2.31 0.47 0.26 -45% 20 Beach Seines Annual beach seine CPUE in 2015 was similar to the average from 1980 to 2015 (57 fish per seine; Figure 15), declining mildly from 2014 to 2015 (62 and 52 per seine, respectively). CPUE declined slightly for both non-native and native fishes from 2014 to 2015 (Figure 15); as usual, non-native fish, dominated by Mississippi silversides (Menidia audens), were far more abundant in seine hauls than native fish (Table 2).
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of the Vascular Plants of Redwood National Park
    Humboldt State University Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University Botanical Studies Open Educational Resources and Data 9-17-2018 Checklist of the Vascular Plants of Redwood National Park James P. Smith Jr Humboldt State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Smith, James P. Jr, "Checklist of the Vascular Plants of Redwood National Park" (2018). Botanical Studies. 85. https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps/85 This Flora of Northwest California-Checklists of Local Sites is brought to you for free and open access by the Open Educational Resources and Data at Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Botanical Studies by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A CHECKLIST OF THE VASCULAR PLANTS OF THE REDWOOD NATIONAL & STATE PARKS James P. Smith, Jr. Professor Emeritus of Botany Department of Biological Sciences Humboldt State Univerity Arcata, California 14 September 2018 The Redwood National and State Parks are located in Del Norte and Humboldt counties in coastal northwestern California. The national park was F E R N S established in 1968. In 1994, a cooperative agreement with the California Department of Parks and Recreation added Del Norte Coast, Prairie Creek, Athyriaceae – Lady Fern Family and Jedediah Smith Redwoods state parks to form a single administrative Athyrium filix-femina var. cyclosporum • northwestern lady fern unit. Together they comprise about 133,000 acres (540 km2), including 37 miles of coast line. Almost half of the remaining old growth redwood forests Blechnaceae – Deer Fern Family are protected in these four parks.
    [Show full text]
  • Caprifoliaceae, Dipsacales)
    Syst. Biol. 59(3):322–341, 2010 c The Author(s) 2010. Published by Oxford University Press, on behalf of the Society of Systematic Biologists. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: [email protected] DOI:10.1093/sysbio/syq011 Advance Access publication on March 22, 2010 Combining Historical Biogeography with Niche Modeling in the Caprifolium Clade of Lonicera (Caprifoliaceae, Dipsacales) STEPHEN A.SMITH1,2,* AND MICHAEL J.DONOGHUE1 1Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, PO Box 208105, New Haven, CT 06520, USA; and 2National Evolutionary Synthesis Center, 2024 West Main Street, Suite A200, Durham, NC 27705, USA; *Correspondence to be sent to: National Evolutionary Synthesis Center, 2024 West Main Street, Suite A200, Durham, NC 27705, USA; E-mail:[email protected]. Received 15 September 2008; reviews returned 17 February 2009; accepted 9 December 2009 Associate Editor: Roberta J. Mason-Gamer Abstract.—The Lonicera clade Caprifolium contains 25 species distributed around the Northern Hemisphere, including in the Mediterranean climates of California and Europe.∼ We sequenced the second intron of LFY to help resolve relationships within the clade where the internal transcribed spacer and chloroplast markers had previously failed to do so. Divergence Downloaded from time estimation and biogeographic analyses over the posterior distribution of dated trees suggest that a widespread an- cestor was distributed across the Northern Hemisphere some 7–17 million years ago. Asian species form a sister group to a clade in which the European species are sister to the North American species. We use climatic niche modeling and divergence time estimates to explore the evolution of climate variables in the group.
    [Show full text]
  • Crangon Franciscorum Class: Multicrustacea, Malacostraca, Eumalacostraca
    Phylum: Arthropoda, Crustacea Crangon franciscorum Class: Multicrustacea, Malacostraca, Eumalacostraca Order: Eucarida, Decapoda, Pleocyemata, Caridea Common gray shrimp Family: Crangonoidea, Crangonidae Taxonomy: Schmitt (1921) described many duncle segment (Wicksten 2011). Inner fla- shrimp in the genus Crago (e.g. Crago fran- gellum of the first antenna is greater than ciscorum) and reserved the genus Crangon twice as long as the outer flagellum (Kuris et for the snapping shrimp (now in the genus al. 2007) (Fig. 2). Alpheus). In 1955–56, the International Mouthparts: The mouth of decapod Commission on Zoological Nomenclature crustaceans comprises six pairs of appendag- formally reserved the genus Crangon for the es including one pair of mandibles (on either sand shrimps only. Recent taxonomic de- side of the mouth), two pairs of maxillae and bate revolves around potential subgeneric three pairs of maxillipeds. The maxillae and designation for C. franciscorum (C. Neocran- maxillipeds attach posterior to the mouth and gon franciscorum, C. franciscorum francis- extend to cover the mandibles (Ruppert et al. corum) (Christoffersen 1988; Kuris and Carl- 2004). Third maxilliped setose and with exo- ton 1977; Butler 1980; Wicksten 2011). pod in C. franciscorum and C. alaskensis (Wicksten 2011). Description Carapace: Thin and smooth, with a Size: Average body length is 49 mm for single medial spine (compare to Lissocrangon males and 68 mm for females (Wicksten with no gastric spines). Also lateral (Schmitt 2011). 1921) (Fig. 1), hepatic, branchiostegal and Color: White, mottled with small black spots, pterygostomian spines (Wicksten 2011). giving gray appearance. Rostrum: Rostrum straight and up- General Morphology: The body of decapod turned (Crangon, Kuris and Carlton 1977).
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Ord Natural Reserve Plant List
    UCSC Fort Ord Natural Reserve Plants Below is the most recently updated plant list for UCSC Fort Ord Natural Reserve. * non-native taxon ? presence in question Listed Species Information: CNPS Listed - as designated by the California Rare Plant Ranks (formerly known as CNPS Lists). More information at http://www.cnps.org/cnps/rareplants/ranking.php Cal IPC Listed - an inventory that categorizes exotic and invasive plants as High, Moderate, or Limited, reflecting the level of each species' negative ecological impact in California. More information at http://www.cal-ipc.org More information about Federal and State threatened and endangered species listings can be found at https://www.fws.gov/endangered/ (US) and http://www.dfg.ca.gov/wildlife/nongame/ t_e_spp/ (CA). FAMILY NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME LISTED Ferns AZOLLACEAE - Mosquito Fern American water fern, mosquito fern, Family Azolla filiculoides ? Mosquito fern, Pacific mosquitofern DENNSTAEDTIACEAE - Bracken Hairy brackenfern, Western bracken Family Pteridium aquilinum var. pubescens fern DRYOPTERIDACEAE - Shield or California wood fern, Coastal wood wood fern family Dryopteris arguta fern, Shield fern Common horsetail rush, Common horsetail, field horsetail, Field EQUISETACEAE - Horsetail Family Equisetum arvense horsetail Equisetum telmateia ssp. braunii Giant horse tail, Giant horsetail Pentagramma triangularis ssp. PTERIDACEAE - Brake Family triangularis Gold back fern Gymnosperms CUPRESSACEAE - Cypress Family Hesperocyparis macrocarpa Monterey cypress CNPS - 1B.2, Cal IPC
    [Show full text]
  • Staff Summary for April 15-16, 2020
    Item No. 30 STAFF SUMMARY FOR APRIL 15-16, 2020 30. SHASTA SNOW-WREATH CESA PETITION Today’s Item Information ☐ Action ☒ Consider and potentially act on the petition, DFW’s evaluation report, and comments received to determine whether listing Shasta snow-wreath (Neviusia cliftonii) as a threatened or endangered species under the California Endangered Species Act (CESA) may be warranted. Summary of Previous/Future Actions • Received petition Sep 30, 2019 • FGC transmitted petition to DFW Oct 10, 2019 • Published notice of receipt of petition Nov 22, 2020 • Public receipt of petition Dec 11-12, 2019; Sacramento • Received DFW 90-day evaluation report Feb 21, 2020; Sacramento • Today, determine if petitioned action Apr 15-16, 2020; Teleconference may be warranted Background A petition to list Shasta snow-wreath as endangered under CESA was submitted by Kathleen Roche and the California Native Plant Society on Sep 30, 2019 (Exhibit 1). On Oct 10, 2019, FGC staff transmitted the petition to DFW for review. A notice of receipt of petition was published in the California Regulatory Notice Register on Nov 22, 2019. California Fish and Game Code Section 2073.5 requires that DFW evaluate the petition and submit to FGC a written evaluation with a recommendation, which was received at FGC’s Feb 21, 2020 meeting. The evaluation report (Exhibit 2) delineates each of the categories of information required for a petition, evaluates the sufficiency of the available scientific information for each of the required components, and incorporates additional relevant information that DFW possessed or received during the review period. Today’s agenda item follows the public release and review period of the evaluation report prior to FGC action, as required in Fish and Game Code Section 2074.
    [Show full text]