DOCSLIB.ORG

Protecting People Through Nature Natural World Heritage Sites As Drivers of Sustainable Development

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Protecting People Through Nature Natural World Heritage Sites As Drivers of Sustainable Development REPORT 2016 PROTECTING PEOPLE THROUGH NATURE NATURAL WORLD HERITAGE SITES AS DRIVERS OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT A REPORT FOR WWF BY ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The report was written by Dalberg Global Development Advisors, and the team comprised Wijnand de Wit, Tamara Pironnet, Ellie Marsh and Simon Allan. This report was made possible by the generous contributions from many individuals and organizations, and we would like to thank the following: Kamal Kunwar (Chitwan National Park), Angelique Songco (Tubbataha Reefs Natural Park), Diego Lynch (Asociación ANAI), Janelle Chanona (OCEANA), Alyssa Carnegie (OCEANA), Professor Andrew Balmford (University of Cambridge), Barbara Engels (German Federal Nature Conservation Agency), Tim Badman (IUCN), Remco Van Merm (IUCN), Elena Osipova (IUCN), Yichuan Shi (UNEP-World Conservation 0RQLWRULQJ&HQWUH ::)DQGLWVRI¿FHVLQ%HOL]H1HSDO3KLOLSSLQHV6SDLQDQG Tanzania. DALBERG GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS 'DOEHUJ*OREDO'HYHORSPHQW$GYLVRUVLVDVWUDWHJLFFRQVXOWLQJ¿UPWKDWZRUNV to raise living standards in developing countries and address global issues such as climate change. Dalberg works with governments, foundations, international agencies, non- governmental organizations, and Fortune 500 companies to make sustainable improvements in the lives of disadvantaged and underserved populations around the world. WWF WWF is one of the world’s largest and most experienced independent conservation organizations, with over 5 million supporters and a global network active in more than 100 countries. WWF’s mission is to stop the degradation of the planet’s natural environment and to build a future in which humans live in harmony with nature, by conserving the world’s biological diversity, ensuring that the use of renewable natural resources is sustainable, and promoting the reduction of pollution and wasteful consumption. The designation of geographical entities in this report, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of WWF concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Published in February 2016 by WWF – World Wide Fund For Nature (Formerly World Wildlife Fund), Gland, Switzerland. Any reproduction in full or in part must mention the title and credit the above-mentioned publisher as the copyright owner. © Text 2016 WWF All rights reserved Design: Louise Clements Design Ltd ISBN 978-2-940529-29-2 PERFORMANCE Paper from neutral responsible sources 02).4%2 No. 01-13-609635 – www.myclimate.org © myclimate – The Climate Protection Partnership WWF International Dalberg Avenue du Mont-Blanc Rue de Chantepoulet 7 1196 Gland, Switzerland 1201 Geneva, Switzerland www.panda.org www.Dalberg.com CONTENTS FOREWORD 6 From WWF International Director General Marco Lambertini WWF’S CALL FOR ACTION 8 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 10 THE VALUE: 12 (FRQRPLFVRFLDODQGHQYLURQPHQWDOEHQH¿WVRI World Heritage sites THE THREATS: 16 Harmful industrial activities in and around World Heritage sites THE SUCCESSES: 28 World Heritage sites and sustainable development THE SOLUTION: 38 Principles for sustainable management of World Heritage sites IN DEPTH: 44 Belize Barrier Reef Reserve System WORLD HERITAGE SITES MAP 52 'H¿QLWLRQRIKDUPIXOLQGXVWULDODFWLYLWLHV ANNEX 58 © Antonio Busiello / WWF-US CHALLENGING THE ANTI-DEVELOPMENT MYTH SURROUNDING CONSERVATION FOREWORD FROM WWF INTERNATIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL MARCO LAMBERTINI For too long we have been told of long-term, robust and that conserving the environment sustainable development that removes economic opportunities EHQH¿WVSHRSOHDQGQDWXUDO for people. The adoption of the systems, including our social Sustainable Development Goals stability, economic prosperity, last year demonstrates that and individual well-being. We governments around the world are not going to develop a just are recognizing that social, and prosperous future, nor defeat economic and environmental poverty and improve health, in a agendas are intrinsically linked weakened or destroyed natural Marco Lambertini, and inseparable. The impact of environment. Director General, climate change perhaps is the This report shows that by WWF International most obvious demonstration of conserving large areas of habitat, WKHOLQNDQGUDPL¿FDWLRQV7KH natural World Heritage sites also same logic applies to deforestation, increase resilience to natural and RYHU¿VKLQJVSHFLHVH[WLQFWLRQV weather-related disasters, support and the list goes on. livelihoods for communities, and Protecting natural areas provide communities with vital and ecosystems is not anti- protection against the impacts development. It is in the interest of climate change. Protecting People Through Nature 6 FOREWORD Shockingly, almost half of all development. The responsibility natural World Heritage sites are lies with the governments threatened by harmful industrial that allow these projects or activities and operations, such concessions, the companies that as oil and gas exploration and WDNHWKHPXSDQGWKH¿QDQFLDO extraction, mining, illegal logging, institutions that fund them. It construction of large-scale LVWLPHIRUJRYHUQPHQWVWRIXO¿O LQIUDVWUXFWXUHRYHU¿VKLQJDQG their commitments to preserving unsustainable water use. the outstanding universal value that led to the declaration of these This should alarm all of us. More natural World Heritage Sites, and than eleven million people living for businesses to support their in and near World Heritage conservation. sites depend on them for food, water, medicine and jobs—that’s Healthy natural World Heritage more than the entire population sites contribute to poverty of Portugal. The well-being of reduction, help alleviate food communities is being put at risk by insecurity, combat climate change, harmful industrial activities that and restore and promote the degrade the environment, and that sustainable use of ecosystems. compromise the ability of these Protecting these sites and investing places to provide economic and in their future should be part of QRQHFRQRPLFEHQH¿WVWKDWDUHVR each government’s national action fundamental to local populations, for achieving its Sustainable as well as to our global community. Development Goals commitments. 'HVSLWHWKHREYLRXVEHQH¿WVRI This report, and the accompanying these natural areas, we still haven’t FDOOWRDFWLRQLVMXVWWKH¿UVWVWHS managed to decouple economic in a broader dialogue in which we development from environmental must all engage. Governments, degradation. This is the deepest civil society and the private sector challenge, and the greatest must work together to achieve imperative, of our time. Instead, ecologically-sound development too often, we grant concessions for that empowers local people, exploration of oil, gas or minerals, supports responsible business, and plan large-scale industrial and provides long-term sustainable projects without considering economic growth. This is the key social and environmental risks. driver to advance an integrated This approach favours short-term agenda that supports development ¿QDQFLDOJDLQRYHUORQJWHUP in balance with environmental sustainable and inclusive economic protection. IF WE WORK TOGETHER TO SECURE THE FUTURE FOR WORLD HERITAGE SITES, WE TAKE A STEP TOWARD ENSURING THAT THE COMMITMENTS MADE TO SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND CLIMATE ACTION ARE MORE THAN WORDS ON PAPER. Protecting People Through Nature 7 CALL FOR ACTION OF THIS REPORT, AND ACKNOWLEDGING THE POTENTIAL FOR NATURAL WORLD TERM SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OUTCOMES FOR PEOPLE AND THE PLANET WWF CALLS ON THE WORLD WWF CALLS ON CORPORATE WWF CALLS ON CIVIL HERITAGE COMMITTEE TO: AND FINANCE ENTITIES TO: SOCIETY GROUPS AND • Utilize the ongoing process of • Comply with the highest standards for NON-GOVERNMENTAL developing the Policy Guidelines responsible business conduct when ORGANIZATIONS TO: for the Implementation of the adhering to national and international World Heritage Convention to laws, as well as recognized international • Participate constructively in the GH¿QHDIRUPDOSROLF\DJDLQVW guidelines such as the OECD Guidelines management and conservation of harmful industrial activities. for Multinational Enterprises. protected areas at the local, national and international levels, and • Require governments, with the • Act as responsible stewards of capital, promote the potential of such places support of the UNESCO World in recognition of the potential for World to deliver sustainable development Heritage Centre, advisory bodies, Heritage sites to be drivers of inclusive outcomes for people and nature. and organizations with practical growth, and comply when investing experience of conservation of with International Finance Corporation • Support the effective natural World Heritage sites, to Performance Standard 6, which relates to implementation of the World report systematically on the social biodiversity conservation and sustainable Heritage Convention, particularly in and economic contributions these management of living natural resources. regard to integrating a sustainable sites make to communities. development perspective into the • Make public and formal no go processes of the convention. • Explore ways to promote greater commitments to refrain from activities involvement of representatives that threaten to degrade the capacity for :RUNZLWKEXVLQHVVHVDQG¿QDQFLDO of communities and indigenous protected areas, and World Heritage sites institutions to help them develop groups into the processes of the in particular, to support the livelihoods
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Meas, Conservation and Conflict: a Case Study of Virunga National Park
    © 2008 International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) Published by the International Institute for Sustainable Development MEAs, Conservation and Conflict The International Institute for Sustainable Development contributes to sustainable development by advancing policy recommendations on international trade and investment, economic policy, climate change, A case study of Virunga Nationalmeasurement Park, and DRCassessmen t, and natural resources management. Through the Internet, we report on international negotiations and share knowledge gained through collaborative projects with global partners, resulting in more rigorous research, capacity building in developing countries and better dialogue between North and South. IISD’s vision is better living for all— sustainably; its mission is to champion innovation, enabling societies to live sustainably. IISD is registered as a charitable Alec Crawford organization in Canada and has 501(c)(3) status in the United States. IISD receives core Johannah Bernstein operating support from the Government of Canada, provided through the Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA), the International Development Research Centre October 2008 (IDRC) and Environment Canada; and from the Province of Manitoba. The institute receives project funding from numerous governments inside and outside Canada, United Nations agencies, foundations and the priate sector. International Institute for Sustainable Development 161 Portage Avenue East, 6th Floor Winnipeg, Manitoba Canada R3B 0Y4 Tel: +1 (204) 958–7700 Fax: +1 (204) 958–7710 © 2008 International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) Published by the International Institute for MEAs, Conservation Sustainable Development and Conflict The International Institute for Sustainable Development contributes to sustainable A case study of Virunga development by advancing policy recommendations on international trade and investment, economic National Park, DRC policy, climate change, measurement and assessment, and natural resources management.
    [Show full text]
  • Gap Analysis in Support of Cpan: the Russian Arctic
    CAFF Habitat Conservation Report No. 9 GAP ANALYSIS IN SUPPORT OF CPAN: THE RUSSIAN ARCTIC Igor Lysenko and David Henry CAFF INTERNATIONAL SECRETRARIAT 2000 This report, prepared by Igor Lysenko, World Conservation Monitoring Centre (WCMC) and David Henry, United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) Global Resource Information Database (GRID)-Arendal, is a technical account of a Gap Analysis Project conducted for the Russian Arctic in 1997-1999 in support of the Circumpolar Protected Areas Network (CPAN) of CAFF. It updates the status and spatial distribution of protected areas within the CAFF area of the Russian Federation and provides, in 22 GIs based maps and several data sets, a wealth of information relevant for present and future management decisions related to habitat conservation in the Russian Arctic. The present Gap Analysis for the Russian Arctic was undertaken in response to the CPAN Strategy and Action Plan requirement for countries to identify gaps in protected area coverage of ecosystems and species and to select sites for further action. Another important objective was to update the Russian data base. The Analysis used a system of twelve landscape units instead of the previously used vegetation zone system as the basis to classify Russia's ecosystems. A comparison of the terrestrial landscape systems against protected area coverage indicates that 27% of the glacier ecosystem is protected, 9.3% of the tundra (treeless portion) and 4.7% of the forest systems within the Arctic boundaries are under protection, but the most important Arctic forested areas have only 0.1% protection. In general, the analysis indicates a negative relationship between ecosystem productivity and protection, which is consistent with findings in 1996.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluating Eden by IIED
    Evaluating Eden Series No 9 STORIES FROM EDEN Case studies of Community- Based Wildlife Management Compiled by Dilys Roe and Margaret Jack April 2001 ii Contents 1. INTRODUCTION..........................................................................................................................................................1 Evaluating Eden ........................................................................................................................................................1 What is CWM? ..........................................................................................................................................................2 2. CENTRAL AND WEST AFRICA................................................................................................................................5 Case Study 1: Kilum-Ijim Forest Project, Cameroon ................................................................................................6 Case Study 2: Okapi Wildlife Reserve and Garamba National Park, Democratic Republic of Congo ........................7 Case Study 3:Transition Zone to the West Region Biosphere Reserve, Niger............................................................8 Case Study 4: Gashaka Gumti National Park, Nigeria ............................................................................................10 3. EAST AFRICA............................................................................................................................................................12 Case Study 5:Western
    [Show full text]
  • Harmful Industrial Activities Other Natural World Heritage Sites
    MAP HARMFUL INDUSTRIAL 169 79 170 191 ACTIVITIES 171 100 87 151 45 43 168 WWF DEFINES HARMFUL 44 INDUSTRIAL ACTIVITIES AS: 207 172 204 80 Operations that cause major 167 38 39 81 94 23 203 disturbances or changes to the 46 93 166 141 42 40 94 94 122 218 193192 99 character of marine or terrestrial 165 41 115 114 164 environments. Such activities are of 221 179 119 71 35 173 91 88 142 34 concern due to their potential to involve 220 197 96 62 118 186 95 194 large impacts on the attributes of 217 112 199 222 184 200 214 215 198 113 56 outstanding universal value and other 52 162 101 51 163 natural, economic and cultural values. 136 212 105 58 54 120 187 85 121 53 61 The impacts of these activities are 185 144 50 55 117 140 103 145 60 57 219 137 213 1 104102 often long-term or permanent. 49 59 They can also be of concern due 72 22 139 106 224 138 73 134 48 216 135 149 226 to their impacts on the sustainability 24 116 97 82 175 196 225 of local livelihoods, and/or because 98 133 195 174 176 86 they put at risk the health, safety or 150 227 65 67 160 154 68 47 107 well-being of communities. Harmful 153 63 70 188 161 152 132 159 66 64 223 69 189 industrial activities are often, but not 190 36 74 37 124 131 exclusively, conducted by multinational 76 92 78 125 83 84 77 201202 123 enterprises and their subsidiaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Obtaining World Heritage Status and the Impacts of Listing Aa, Bart J.M
    University of Groningen Preserving the heritage of humanity? Obtaining world heritage status and the impacts of listing Aa, Bart J.M. van der IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date: 2005 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): Aa, B. J. M. V. D. (2005). Preserving the heritage of humanity? Obtaining world heritage status and the impacts of listing. s.n. Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum. Download date: 23-09-2021 Appendix 4 World heritage site nominations Listed site in May 2004 (year of rejection, year of listing, possible year of extension of the site) Rejected site and not listed until May 2004 (first year of rejection) Afghanistan Península Valdés (1999) Jam,
    [Show full text]
  • Confirmed Soc Reports List 2015-2016
    Confirmed State of Conservation Reports for natural and mixed World Heritage sites 2015 - 2016 Nr Region Country Site Natural or Additional information mixed site 1 LAC Argentina Iguazu National Park Natural 2 APA Australia Tasmanian Wilderness Mixed 3 EURNA Belarus / Poland Bialowieza Forest Natural 4 LAC Belize Belize Barrier Reef Reserve System Natural World Heritage in Danger 5 AFR Botswana Okavango Delta Natural 6 LAC Brazil Iguaçu National Park Natural 7 LAC Brazil Cerrado Protected Areas: Chapada dos Veadeiros and Natural Emas National Parks 8 EURNA Bulgaria Pirin National Park Natural 9 AFR Cameroon Dja Faunal Reserve Natural 10 EURNA Canada Gros Morne National Park Natural 11 AFR Central African Republic Manovo-Gounda St Floris National Park Natural World Heritage in Danger 12 LAC Costa Rica / Panama Talamanca Range-La Amistad Reserves / La Amistad Natural National Park 13 AFR Côte d'Ivoire Comoé National Park Natural World Heritage in Danger 14 AFR Côte d'Ivoire / Guinea Mount Nimba Strict Nature Reserve Natural World Heritage in Danger 15 AFR Democratic Republic of the Congo Garamba National Park Natural World Heritage in Danger 16 AFR Democratic Republic of the Congo Kahuzi-Biega National Park Natural World Heritage in Danger 17 AFR Democratic Republic of the Congo Okapi Wildlife Reserve Natural World Heritage in Danger 18 AFR Democratic Republic of the Congo Salonga National Park Natural World Heritage in Danger 19 AFR Democratic Republic of the Congo Virunga National Park Natural World Heritage in Danger 20 AFR Democratic
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Conservation Outlook Assessment (Archived)
    IUCN World Heritage Outlook: https://worldheritageoutlook.iucn.org/ Lena Pillars Nature Park - 2017 Conservation Outlook Assessment (archived) IUCN Conservation Outlook Assessment 2017 (archived) Finalised on 09 November 2017 Please note: this is an archived Conservation Outlook Assessment for Lena Pillars Nature Park. To access the most up-to-date Conservation Outlook Assessment for this site, please visit https://www.worldheritageoutlook.iucn.org. Lena Pillars Nature Park SITE INFORMATION Country: Russian Federation Inscribed in: 2012 Criteria: (viii) Site description: Lena Pillars Nature Park is marked by spectacular rock pillars that reach a height of approximately 100 m along the banks of the Lena River in the central part of the Sakha Republic (Yakutia). They were produced by the region’s extreme continental climate with an annual temperature range of almost 100 degrees Celsius (from –60 °C in winter to +40 °C in summer). The pillars form rocky buttresses isolated from each other by deep and steep gullies developed by frost shattering directed along intervening joints. Penetration of water from the surface has facilitated cryogenic processes (freeze-thaw action), which have widened gullies between pillars leading to their isolation. Fluvial processes are also critical to the pillars. The site also contains a wealth of Cambrian fossil remains of numerous species, some of them unique. © UNESCO IUCN World Heritage Outlook: https://worldheritageoutlook.iucn.org/ Lena Pillars Nature Park - 2017 Conservation Outlook Assessment (archived) SUMMARY 2017 Conservation Outlook Good Because of the relatively robust nature of the values contributing to the OUV of Lena Pillars Nature Park, the remoteness and lack of inhabitants of the site, and the existing protection and management regime, which is effective overall in spite of some low concern, the overall conservation outlook of Lena Pillars Nature Park is assessed as good.
    [Show full text]
  • Stevns Klint
    EUROPE / NORTH AMERICA STEVNS KLINT DENMARK Denmark – Stevns Klint WORLD HERITAGE NOMINATION – IUCN TECHNICAL EVALUATION STEVNS KLINT (DENMARK) – ID No. 1416 IUCN RECOMMENDATION TO WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE: To inscribe the property under natural criteria. Key paragraphs of Operational Guidelines: Paragraph 77: Nominated property meets World Heritage criteria. Paragraph 78: Nominated property meets integrity and protection and management requirements. 1. DOCUMENTATION protected area is in eastern Denmark. The nominated property includes intertidal cliffs and adjacent a) Date nomination received by IUCN: 20 March 2013 constructed tunnels and abandoned quarries which expose Cretaceous and Tertiary strata. A buffer zone of b) Additional information officially requested from 4,136 ha has been defined and provides protection for and provided by the State Party: Following the 471 ha of land adjacent to the cliffs and for 3,655 ha of technical evaluation mission the State Party was marine areas. The property is technically a serial requested to provide supplementary information on 13 property of two component parts, as there is a break in December 2013. The information was received on 28 the coastal section where a quarry export quay is February 2014. located at Stevns Kridtbrud. c) Additional literature consulted: Various sources as Stevns Klint illustrates the best-known global mass cited in the nomination, together with Wells, R. T. (1996) extinction event in the history of Earth, which marks the Earth's geological history: a contextual framework Cretaceous - Tertiary (K/T) boundary. This mass for assessment of World Heritage fossil site extinction occurred c.65 million years ago and is nominations. IUCN, Gland; Molina, E., Alegret, L., particularly notable due to its association with Chixulub Arenillas, I., Arz, J.A., Gallala, N., Hardenbol, J., von asteroid impact that took place in what is currently the Salis, K., Etienne Steurbaut5, Noel Vandenberghe, E.
    [Show full text]
  • Sonoran Desert GEORGE GENTRY/FWSGEORGE the Sonoran Desert Has 2,000 Endemic Plant Species—More Than Anywhere Else in North America
    in the shadow of the wall: borderlands conservation hotspots on the line Borderlands Conservation Hotspot 2. Sonoran Desert GEORGE GENTRY/FWSGEORGE The Sonoran Desert has 2,000 endemic plant species—more than anywhere else in North America. hink deserts are wastelands? A visit to one of the national monuments or national wildlife refuges in the Sonoran Desert could change your mind. These borderlands are teeming with plants and animals impressively adapted to extreme conditions. T During your visit you might encounter a biologist, a volunteer or a local activist in awe of the place and dedicated to protecting it. The Sonoran Desert is so important to the natural heritage of the United States and Mexico that both countries are vested in conservation lands and programs and on a joint mission to preserve it. “A border wall,” says one conservation coalition leader, “harms our mission” (Campbell 2017). The Sonoran Desert is one of the largest intact wild areas mountains, where they find nesting cavities and swoop in the country, 100,387 square miles stretching across the between cactuses and trees to hunt lizards and other prey. southwestern United States and northwestern Mexico. This Rare desert bighorn sheep stick to the steep, rocky slopes of desert is renowned for columnar cactuses like saguaro, organ isolated desert mountain ranges where they keep a watchful pipe and cardón. Lesser known is the fact that the Sonoran eye for predators. One of the most endangered mammals in Desert has more endemic plant species—2,000—than North America, Sonoran pronghorn still occasionally cross anywhere else in North America (Nabhan 2017).
    [Show full text]
  • Geographical Names and Sustainable Tourism
    No. 59 NOVEMBERNo. 59 NOVEMBER 2020 2020 Geographical Names and Sustainable Tourism Socio- Institutional cultural Sustainable Tourism Economic Environmental Table of Contents The Information Bulletin of the United Nations MESSAGE FROM THE CHAIRPERSON ............................................... 3 Group of Experts on Geographical Names (formerly Reconsidérer notre mobilité ......................................................... 3 UNGEGN Newsletter) is issued twice a year by the Secretariat of the Group of Experts. The Secretariat Reconsider our mobility ............................................................... 4 is served by the Statistics Division (UNSD), MESSAGE FROM THE SECRETARIAT ................................................. 5 Department for Economic and Social Affairs (DESA), Secretariat of the United Nations. Contributions “Geographical names and sustainable tourism ............................ 5 and reports received from the Experts of the Group, IN MEMORIAM ................................................................................ 7 its Linguistic/Geographical Divisions and its Working Groups are reviewed and edited jointly by the Danutė Janė Mardosienė (1947-2020) ........................................ 7 Secretariat and the UNGEGN Working Group on SPECIAL FEATURE: GEOGRAPHICAL NAMES AND SUSTAINABLE Publicity and Funding. Contributions for the TOURISM ......................................................................................... 9 Information Bulletin can only be considered when they are made
    [Show full text]
  • Migration: on the Move in Alaska
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Alaska Park Science Alaska Region Migration: On the Move in Alaska Volume 17, Issue 1 Alaska Park Science Volume 17, Issue 1 June 2018 Editorial Board: Leigh Welling Jim Lawler Jason J. Taylor Jennifer Pederson Weinberger Guest Editor: Laura Phillips Managing Editor: Nina Chambers Contributing Editor: Stacia Backensto Design: Nina Chambers Contact Alaska Park Science at: [email protected] Alaska Park Science is the semi-annual science journal of the National Park Service Alaska Region. Each issue highlights research and scholarship important to the stewardship of Alaska’s parks. Publication in Alaska Park Science does not signify that the contents reflect the views or policies of the National Park Service, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute National Park Service endorsement or recommendation. Alaska Park Science is found online at: www.nps.gov/subjects/alaskaparkscience/index.htm Table of Contents Migration: On the Move in Alaska ...............1 Future Challenges for Salmon and the Statewide Movements of Non-territorial Freshwater Ecosystems of Southeast Alaska Golden Eagles in Alaska During the A Survey of Human Migration in Alaska's .......................................................................41 Breeding Season: Information for National Parks through Time .......................5 Developing Effective Conservation Plans ..65 History, Purpose, and Status of Caribou Duck-billed Dinosaurs (Hadrosauridae), Movements in Northwest
    [Show full text]
  • 37Th World Heritage Committee Session Phnom Penh, Cambodia, 16-27 June 2013
    Enhancing the IUCN World Heritage Programme II – Focus Europe 7-11 November 2013, Vilm, Germany 37th World Heritage Committee Session Phnom Penh, Cambodia, 16-27 June 2013 Boris Erg IUCN The 37th Session of the World Heritage Committee took place in the Kingdom of Cambodia, in Phnom Penh and Siem Reap-Angkor, from 16th to 27th June 2013. It was organized by UNESCO and the National Commission of Cambodia with the support of the Office of the Council of Ministers. World Heritage Committee The Committee is a governing body responsible for the implementation of the World Heritage Convention. It decides on new inscriptions on the World Heritage List. It examines State of Conservation reports and also decides on the inscription or deletion of properties on the List of World Heritage in Danger. World Heritage Committee (ctd.) The 21 States Parties of the current World Heritage Committee are the following: Algeria, Cambodia, Colombia, Estonia, Ethiopia, France, Germany, India, Iraq, Japan, Malaysia, Mali, Mexico, Qatar, Russian Federation, Senegal, Serbia, South Africa, Switzerland, Thailand, and United Arab Emirates. During the 19th session of the General Assembly (19-21 November 2013), 12 seats will have to be filled. Outgoing members in 2013 are: Cambodia, Estonia, Ethiopia, France, Iraq, Mali, Mexico, Russian Federation, South Africa, Switzerland, Thailand, United Arab Emirates. IUCN’s advisory role Ahead of the annual World Heritage Committee meeting, IUCN submits its recommendations regarding the inscriptions of new sites following a rigorous evaluation process through which it works with members on the ground, scientific experts, independent feedback and desk reviews. IUCN also submits “state of conservation” reports for sites under threat or sites that are already on the danger list or that it considers should be.
    [Show full text]