Protecting the Endangered Okapi, and It's Habitat, in the Democratic

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Protecting the Endangered Okapi, and It's Habitat, in the Democratic

The Okapi Wildlife Reserve Biodiversity of the Congo Okapi Conservation Project works with the Institute in The Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), the Congo for the Conservation of Nature (ICCN), a most biologically diverse country in Africa, holds government organization responsible for the infinite natural treasures and significant species protection of the Reserve, and communities such as Grauer’s gorilla, forest elephants and throughout the Okapi Wildlife Reserve to ensure bonobo. Over 1,500 types of plants and animals, the protection of the okapi and many other species including the okapi, are found nowhere else in the in this equatorial rainforest. world. Okapi Wildlife Reserve Democratic Republic of Congo OCP provides logistical and financial support to 110 ICCN rangers to provide a conservation presence in the region and to monitor land use changes and Protecting the Endangered Okapi, protect the wildlife and natural resources of the Okapi and it’s habitat, in the Wildlife Reserve. Democratic Republic of Congo OCP presently employs 58 people, working from four locations around the Reserve, who implement education programs through meetings, seminars, and providing social assistance that moves communities to care PROGRAMS about conserving resources and wildlife. Okapi Conservation Project (OCP) works in the OCP focuses on developing an economic heart of the and educational foundation Democratic on which the Reserve can Republic of operate. This is achieved Congo to through programs in wildlife protect the protection and education, natural agroforestry, and habitat of the community assistance. endangered Broad-based community okapi and assistance includes: indigenous DONATE TO HELP SAVE THE OKAPI l Mbuti pygmies Building and supplying OCP is represented by Wildlife Conservation schools and health clinics living in the Okapi Wildlife Reserve. Global (WCG) a nonprofit, 501(c)(3) l Developing fresh water organization. One hundred percent of gifts Okapi are entirely dependent on the forest sources made to the Okapi Conservation Project sanctuary for survival; deforestation, along with l Providing medical care through WCG directly support the poaching and mining, have led to their decline. and transport Conservation stewardship programs promote the management of the Okapi Wildlife Reserve, l viability of the region’s biodiversity and survival of Improving food security help local communities find sustainable ways of living, and provide an extensive refuge for native species like the okapi. l Conservation education the region’s endangered creatures. www.okapiconservation.org l Okapi — Okapia Johnstoni One of the oldest mammals on Earth the Okapi is known to the western world only since the early 20th century “The Forest Giraffe” l Classified ‘Endangered’ by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List of Threatened Species l Okapi need undisturbed tracts of forest to sustain themselves; approximately 3,000 Okapi live in the Reserve l Endemic to the Democratic Republic of Congo, the Okapi has been protected since 1933.

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Meas, Conservation and Conflict: a Case Study of Virunga National Park
© 2008 International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) Published by the International Institute for Sustainable Development MEAs, Conservation and Conflict The International Institute for Sustainable Development contributes to sustainable development by advancing policy recommendations on international trade and investment, economic policy, climate change, A case study of Virunga Nationalmeasurement Park, and DRCassessmen t, and natural resources management. Through the Internet, we report on international negotiations and share knowledge gained through collaborative projects with global partners, resulting in more rigorous research, capacity building in developing countries and better dialogue between North and South. IISD’s vision is better living for all— sustainably; its mission is to champion innovation, enabling societies to live sustainably. IISD is registered as a charitable Alec Crawford organization in Canada and has 501(c)(3) status in the United States. IISD receives core Johannah Bernstein operating support from the Government of Canada, provided through the Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA), the International Development Research Centre October 2008 (IDRC) and Environment Canada; and from the Province of Manitoba. The institute receives project funding from numerous governments inside and outside Canada, United Nations agencies, foundations and the priate sector. International Institute for Sustainable Development 161 Portage Avenue East, 6th Floor Winnipeg, Manitoba Canada R3B 0Y4 Tel: +1 (204) 958–7700 Fax: +1 (204) 958–7710 © 2008 International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) Published by the International Institute for MEAs, Conservation Sustainable Development and Conflict The International Institute for Sustainable Development contributes to sustainable A case study of Virunga development by advancing policy recommendations on international trade and investment, economic National Park, DRC policy, climate change, measurement and assessment, and natural resources management.
[Show full text]
Evaluating Eden by IIED
Evaluating Eden Series No 9 STORIES FROM EDEN Case studies of Community- Based Wildlife Management Compiled by Dilys Roe and Margaret Jack April 2001 ii Contents 1. INTRODUCTION..........................................................................................................................................................1 Evaluating Eden ........................................................................................................................................................1 What is CWM? ..........................................................................................................................................................2 2. CENTRAL AND WEST AFRICA................................................................................................................................5 Case Study 1: Kilum-Ijim Forest Project, Cameroon ................................................................................................6 Case Study 2: Okapi Wildlife Reserve and Garamba National Park, Democratic Republic of Congo ........................7 Case Study 3:Transition Zone to the West Region Biosphere Reserve, Niger............................................................8 Case Study 4: Gashaka Gumti National Park, Nigeria ............................................................................................10 3. EAST AFRICA............................................................................................................................................................12 Case Study 5:Western
[Show full text]
Confirmed Soc Reports List 2015-2016
Confirmed State of Conservation Reports for natural and mixed World Heritage sites 2015 - 2016 Nr Region Country Site Natural or Additional information mixed site 1 LAC Argentina Iguazu National Park Natural 2 APA Australia Tasmanian Wilderness Mixed 3 EURNA Belarus / Poland Bialowieza Forest Natural 4 LAC Belize Belize Barrier Reef Reserve System Natural World Heritage in Danger 5 AFR Botswana Okavango Delta Natural 6 LAC Brazil Iguaçu National Park Natural 7 LAC Brazil Cerrado Protected Areas: Chapada dos Veadeiros and Natural Emas National Parks 8 EURNA Bulgaria Pirin National Park Natural 9 AFR Cameroon Dja Faunal Reserve Natural 10 EURNA Canada Gros Morne National Park Natural 11 AFR Central African Republic Manovo-Gounda St Floris National Park Natural World Heritage in Danger 12 LAC Costa Rica / Panama Talamanca Range-La Amistad Reserves / La Amistad Natural National Park 13 AFR Côte d'Ivoire Comoé National Park Natural World Heritage in Danger 14 AFR Côte d'Ivoire / Guinea Mount Nimba Strict Nature Reserve Natural World Heritage in Danger 15 AFR Democratic Republic of the Congo Garamba National Park Natural World Heritage in Danger 16 AFR Democratic Republic of the Congo Kahuzi-Biega National Park Natural World Heritage in Danger 17 AFR Democratic Republic of the Congo Okapi Wildlife Reserve Natural World Heritage in Danger 18 AFR Democratic Republic of the Congo Salonga National Park Natural World Heritage in Danger 19 AFR Democratic Republic of the Congo Virunga National Park Natural World Heritage in Danger 20 AFR Democratic
[Show full text]
Yellow-Backed Duiker ... a Giant Among Dwarfs! GIRAFFE TAG
ANTELOPE AND Yellow-backed duiker ... a giant among dwarfs! GIRAFFE TAG Why exhibit yellow-backed duikers? • Awe visitors with tales of carnivorous antelope! Although duikers typically eat fruit, they will feed on carrion and may even hunt small animals. • Capitalize on the attempts of guests to say their unpronounceable name! Duiker (rhymes with biker) is Dutch for ‘diver’ - a great interpretive opportunity to describe how these antelope flee danger by “diving” into undergrowth. • Showcase rainforest diversity by adding this species - the largest dwarf antelope - to existing exhibits housing okapi, bongo, or even primates. • Connect the erectile yellow dorsal patch of this species to other visual signals used by animals in your zoo (e.g., the tails of white-tailed deer, the manes of warthogs, and crests of cockatoos). Stewardship Opportunities MEASUREMENTS IUCN NEAR Okapi Conservation Project - Ituri Forest Length: 4 feet THREATENED http://www.okapiconservation.org Height: 2.5 feet CITES II at shoulder Bush Meat Crisis Task Force Weight: 100-175 lbs >150,000 http://www.bushmeat.org/ Rainforest Africa in the wild Care and Husbandry YELLOW SSP: 49.49 (98) in 29 AZA (+6 non-AZA) institutions (2018) Species coordinator: Linda Bachers, Milwaukee County Zoo [email protected] Social nature: Typically solitary, or in pairs accompanied by recent offspring. Males can be territorial and should not be housed together. Mixed species: The TAG strongly recommends mixing this species with bongo and okapi to maximize space use. Has been housed with other antelope (including smaller duikers), colobus, guineafowl, and cranes. Housing: Avoid extremes of heat and cold. It is recommended that enclosure containment be solid to at least 3 feet to provide a visual barrier.
[Show full text]
IUCN SSC Giraffe and Okapi Specialist Group
IUCN SSC Giraffe and Okapi Specialist Group 2018 Report Julian Fennessy Noelle Kumpel Co-Chairs Mission statement nium, but hope to begin to stem the species- Julian Fennessy (1) The vision of the Giraffe and Okapi Specialist wide declines and increase some populations, Noelle Kumpel (2) Group (GOSG) is: viable populations of Giraffe such as the Niger giraffe. However, we do need and Okapi, iconic African species, and their to increase survey effort and accuracy in order Red List Authority Coordinator habitats, are conserved sustainably and for to gauge any sort of conservation success, so this is a priority for Okapi, though heavily David Mallon (3) their evolutionary potential across, and role in, naturally functioning ecosystems; are valued dependent on funding and the security situation which is a considerable and difficult to counter Location/Affiliation and protected, locally and globally, recognising threat to this species in particular. (1) Giraffe Conservation Foundation, Windhoek, their independent right to existence and our Namibia duty to current and future generations. We will Targets for the 2017-2020 quadrennium (2) Independent (BirdLife International), achieve our vision by: (1) providing coordina- Cambridge, UK tion, support and technical advice; (2) moni- Assess (3) Division of Biology and Conservation toring and reporting of population status and Red List: (1) update Giraffe and Okapi species Ecology, Manchester Metropolitan University, trends; and (3) raising awareness and providing Red List assessments; (2) complete nine Giraffe Derbyshire, UK information. subspecies Red List assessments. Research activities: (1) establish a giraffid publi- Projected impact for the 2017-2020 Number of members cations/metadata repository; (2) Giraffe and quadrennium 58 Okapi taxonomy review; (3) develop stan- By the end of 2020, we expect to have a clearer, dardised methods or protocols for Giraffe and Social networks coordinated, joint framework for conserving Okapi surveys.
[Show full text]
State of Conservation of the Properties Inscribed on the List of World Heritage in Danger
World Heritage 37 COM WHC-13/37.COM/7A.Add Paris, 17 May 2013 Original: English / French UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION CONVENTION CONCERNING THE PROTECTION OF THE WORLD CULTURAL AND NATURAL HERITAGE WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE Thirty-seventh session Phnom Penh, Cambodia 16-27 June 2013 Item 7A of the Provisional Agenda: State of conservation of the properties inscribed on the List of World Heritage in Danger SUMMARY In accordance with Section IV B, paragraphs 190-191 of the Operational Guidelines, the Committee shall review annually the state of conservation of properties inscribed on the List of World Heritage in Danger. This review shall include such monitoring procedures and expert missions as might be determined necessary by the Committee. This document contains information on the state of conservation of properties inscribed on the List of World Heritage in Danger. The World Heritage Committee is requested to review the reports on the state of conservation of properties contained in this document. The full reports of reactive monitoring missions requested by the World Heritage Committee are available at the following Web address in their original language: http://whc.unesco.org/en/sessions/37COM/ All previous state of conservation reports are available through the World Heritage State of conservation Information System at the following Web address: http://whc.unesco.org/en/soc Decision required: The Committee is requested to review the following state of conservation reports. The Committee may wish to adopt the draft Decision presented at the end of each state of conservation report. TABLE OF CONTENT I. STATE OF CONSERVATION REPORTS .........................................................................
[Show full text]
Okapia Johnstoni), Using Non-Invasive Genetic Techniques
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by UCL Discovery Enhancing knowledge of the ecology of a highly elusive species, the okapi (Okapia johnstoni), using non-invasive genetic techniques David W. G. Stanton*; School of Biosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF10 3AX, United Kingdom Ashley Vosper; Address? Stuart Nixon; Address? John Hart; Lukuru Foundation, Projet Tshuapa-Lomami-Lualaba (TL2), 1235 Ave Poids Lourds, Kinshasa, DRC Noëlle F. Kümpel; Conservation Programmes, Zoological Society of London, London NW1 4RY, United Kingdom Michael W. Bruford; School of Biosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF10 3AX, United Kingdom John G. Ewen§; Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, London NW1 4RY, United Kingdom Jinliang Wang§; Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, London NW1 4RY, United Kingdom *Corresponding author, §Joint senior authors ABSTRACT Okapi (Okapia johnstoni) are an even-toed ungulate in the family Giraffidae, and are endemic to the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). Very little is known about okapi ecology in the wild. We used non-invasive genetic methods to examine the social structure, mating system and dispersal for a population of okapi in the Réserve de Faune à Okapis, DRC. Okapi individuals appear to be solitary, although there was some evidence of genetically similar individuals being associated at a very small spatial scale. There was no evidence for any close spatial association between groups of related or unrelated okapi but we did find evidence for male-biased dispersal. Okapi are genetically polygamous or promiscuous, and are also likely to be socially polygamous or promiscuous. An isolation by distance pattern of genetic similarity was present, but appears to be operating at just below the spatial scale of the area investigated in the present study.
[Show full text]
Camelus Dromedarius) Need Shaded Areas? a Case Study of the Camel Market in Doha
animals Article Do Camels (Camelus dromedarius) Need Shaded Areas? A Case Study of the Camel Market in Doha Martina Zappaterra, Laura Menchetti , Leonardo Nanni Costa and Barbara Padalino * Department of Agricultural and Food Sciences, University of Bologna, Viale Fanin 46, I-40127 Bologna, Italy; [email protected] (M.Z.); [email protected] (L.M.); [email protected] (L.N.C.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Simple Summary: Scientiﬁc knowledge concerning dromedary camel behavior and welfare is still limited. To date, providing pens with adequate shaded areas is not regulated in camel husbandry. The objectives of this study were to document whether dromedary camels have a preference for shade and describe how their behavior would change depending on the presence of shade in pens with different animal densities. Analyzing the behavior of camels kept at a permanent market in Doha, we found they had a preference for shade, and adequate shaded areas seemed to exert a positive effect on their behavioral repertoire. Camels in shade expressed more natural behaviors such as lying in sternal recumbency and ruminating, while those in the sun showed more walking and standing. Limited space allowance, instead, seemed to affect camel welfare, increasing the expression of stereotypic behavior (i.e., pacing). Overall, the results of this pilot study suggest that provision of adequate shaded areas could safeguard camel wellbeing under extremely hot conditions. Citation: Zappaterra, M.; Menchetti, Abstract: This study aimed at documenting whether dromedary camels have a preference for shade L.; Nanni Costa, L.; Padalino, B. Do and how their behavior would change depending on the presence of shade and variable space Camels (Camelus dromedarius) Need allowance.
[Show full text]
CARPE Overview
CARPE Overview July 12, 2021 1 · General Sector Overview Central Africa’s Congo Basin is critical to the health, livelihoods, and security of more than 80 million people. ○ Forests and peatlands regulate climate and millions of tons of carbon. ○ Endangered wildlife species (forest elephants, chimpanzees, bonobos, and lowland and mountain gorillas) ○ Congo River provides food, fresh water, and transport for people and wildlife. The Congo Basin is also a region of change, opportunity, and uncertainty. ○ Logging, harvesting timber for fuel, bushmeat hunting, poaching and wildlife trafﬁcking, and expanding smallholder agriculture increasingly contribute to deforestation and defaunation of the region. ○ Diseases such as Ebola and the loss of forest landscapes are detrimental for the health and livelihoods. ○ International market for wildlife and wildlife products attracts violence, increases corruption, and funds international criminal syndicates. ○ Uncontrolled and extractive use of natural resources underlies many conﬂicts. N I G E R I A C H A D CARPE PROGRAM FOCUS LANDSCAPES S O U T H Democratic Republic of the Congo · August 2019 S U D A N C E N T R A L A F R I C A N R E P U B L I C 9 Garamba C A M E R O O N Bangui Chinko Yaounde 1 Tri-National Sangha Landscape 7 EQUATORIAL 13 Ituri GUINEA Dja-Odzala Epulu 10 Minkébé Tri 5 Aru Monte Alén National (Tridom) Maringa Monte de Cristal Lopori-Wamba C O N G O U G A N D A Libreville 12 G A B O N 6 Lopé Maiko-Tayna 8 Chaillu 3 Kahuzi Virunga Louesse Lac Télé 4 Biega Kigali 11 Lac Tumba Gamba 2 Salonga R W A N D A Mayumba Léconi Lukenie Conkouati Batéké Sankuru Léfini BURUNDI Brazzaville Kinshasa T A N Z A N I A D E M O C R A T I C R E P U B L I C O F T H E C O N G O AFRICA A N G O L A Country Capital Landscape Boundary _ Map Reference: RAFR-CP006-0318; International Boundary Protected Area CARPE: Central Africa Regional Preliminary/provisional, "as-is" and subject to revision.
[Show full text]
Safeguarding Our Natural Heritage WCS and the WORLD HERITAGE CONVENTION Human Activity Is Transforming Our Planet
Safeguarding our Natural Heritage WCS AND THE WORLD HERITAGE CONVENTION Human activity is transforming our planet. Increasing demand for resources is placing extraordinary pressure on our natural world, driving a record number of wildlife species to extinction, and unraveling ecosystems and degrading the services they provide to people. Terrestrial and marine habitats around the world are undergoing change at an unprecedented rate, threatening the environment and the myriad species—including humans—whose existence depends on it. Protected areas are powerful tools for conservation during such extraordinary change. Legally protected, well-managed landscapes and seascapes help maintain ecologically viable wildlife populations, while preserving ecosystem functions and services for humans. In order to succeed, any long-term conservation strategy must include the conservation and management of existing protected areas, along with the creation of new ones that focus on those intact, climate-resilient, and biodiverse ecosystems containing critical species and habitats. However, creating and managing protected areas requires both resources and political will. Many existing protected areas are chronically underfunded and suffer from inadequate infrastructure, poorly-trained and under-equipped staff, corruption, and/or a lack of political support. That being said, many governments are highly committed to the conservation of protected areas, particularly their World Heritage sites. 2 Non-governmental conservation organizations like the Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS) are leading the way on protected areas and site-based conservation. WCS, founded in 1895, is a global conservation organization with a science-based approach to the protection of wildlife and wild places. WCS currently manages hundreds of conservation projects in nearly 60 countries.
[Show full text]
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Division of International Conservation Wildlife Without Borders-Africa Summary FY 2011 in 2011, T
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Division of International Conservation Wildlife Without Borders-Africa Summary FY 2011 In 2011, the USFWS awarded 18 new grants from the Wildlife Without Borders-Africa program totaling $1,373,767.85, which was matched by $813,661.00 in leveraged funds. Field projects in eleven countries (in alphabetical order below) will be supported, in addition to seven projects that involve multiple countries. Democratic Republic of Congo AFR-0114 Building the foundation for a range-wide okapi conservation status assessment. In partnership with Zoological Society of London. The purpose of this project is to train rangers from the Institut Congolais pour la Conservacion de la Nature (ICCN), the conservation authority of the Democratic Republic of Congo, as part of a major field-based okapi conservation status assessment. Informative field guides on okapi ecology and public awareness-raising materials will be produced through broader collaborative conservation and community education efforts. FWS/USAID: $93,985 Leveraged funds: $146,517 Ethiopia AFR-0081 Training park personnel on fish resource identification and conservation in Alatish National Park, Ethiopia. In partnership with Addis Ababa University and Institute of Biodiversity Conservation. The purpose of this project is to train park personnel in Alatish National Park on diversity, distribution and importance of the fish life of the region. Park staff will learn methods of sampling, identification, and data collection on fishes in order to improve their conservation and management activities. FWS/USAID: $24,816 Leveraged funds: $6,160 Gabon AFR-0086 Increasing Institutional and Individual Capacity for Crocodile and Hippo Management in Gabon Through the Implementation of a Crocodile Management Unit.
[Show full text]
Giraffid – Volume 8, Issue 1, 2014
Giraffid Newsletter of the IUCN SSC Giraffe & Okapi Specialist Group Note from the Co-Chairs Volume 8(1), September 2014 Giraffe conservation efforts have never been as internationally prominent as Inside this issue: they are today – exciting times! The Giraffe Conservation Foundation’s launch of World Giraffe Day – 21 June 2014 resulted in the biggest single event for giraffe The first-ever World Giraffe Day 2 conservation in history, bringing together a network of like-minded enthusiasts GiraffeSpotter.org – A citizen science online platform for giraffe observations 5 from around the world to raise awareness and funds. This first annual event can only get bigger and better, and a great step towards a ‘One Plan’ approach for Rothschild’s refuge 6 giraffe. A historic overview of giraffe distribution in Namibia 8 In this issue of Giraffid Paul Rose and Julian further explore the steps taken Going to new length: A ‘One Plan towards building a more collaborative approach between the in situ and ex situ Approach’ for giraffe 13 communities, based initially on critical research and now undertaking targeted Enrichment methods used for Giraffa efforts to save giraffe. From studbook analysis to historical distributions of camelopardalis and Gazella dama mhorr giraffe, and oxpeckers to flamingos, this issue is filled with interesting tales and at East Midland Zoological Society 15 stories, not to forget David Brown’s piece on lion vs. giraffe! Clawing their way to the top: Lion vs. Over the past six months the IUCN SSC Giraffe & Okapi Specialist Group have giraffe! 19 worked hard to undertake the first-ever IUCN Red List assessments of all giraffe New project: Giraffe within the Free State Nature Reserve 20 (sub)species.
[Show full text]