DOCSLIB.ORG

Evaluating Eden by IIED

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Evaluating Eden by IIED Evaluating Eden Series No 9 STORIES FROM EDEN Case studies of Community- Based Wildlife Management Compiled by Dilys Roe and Margaret Jack April 2001 ii Contents 1. INTRODUCTION..........................................................................................................................................................1 Evaluating Eden ........................................................................................................................................................1 What is CWM? ..........................................................................................................................................................2 2. CENTRAL AND WEST AFRICA................................................................................................................................5 Case Study 1: Kilum-Ijim Forest Project, Cameroon ................................................................................................6 Case Study 2: Okapi Wildlife Reserve and Garamba National Park, Democratic Republic of Congo ........................7 Case Study 3:Transition Zone to the West Region Biosphere Reserve, Niger............................................................8 Case Study 4: Gashaka Gumti National Park, Nigeria ............................................................................................10 3. EAST AFRICA............................................................................................................................................................12 Case Study 5:Western Serengeti,Tanzania ..............................................................................................................13 Case Study 6: Mount Kenya Forest, Kenya ..............................................................................................................16 Case Study 7: Lake Mburo National Park, Uganda ................................................................................................18 4. SOUTHERN AFRICA ................................................................................................................................................20 Case Study 8: Communal Conservancies, Namibia ..................................................................................................21 Case Study 9: CAMPFIRE, Zimbabwe....................................................................................................................23 Case Study 10: Madikwe Game Reserve, South Africa............................................................................................25 Case Study 11: Mkambati Nature Reserve, South Africa........................................................................................26 Case Study 12:The Makuleke Land Claim, South Africa ........................................................................................28 Case Study 13: Dwesa and Cwebe Wildlife and Marine Reserves, South Africa ....................................................29 Case Study 14: Okavango Region, Botswana ..........................................................................................................31 5. SOUTH ASIA..............................................................................................................................................................33 Case Study 15: Forest, Soil and Water Conservation in Bhaonta-Kolyala Villages, Rajasthan, India ......................34 Case Study 16: Forest Conservation at Jardhargaon, Uttar Pradesh, India ............................................................36 Case Study 17: Natural Resource Management at Mendha (Lekha) Village, Maharashtra, India ..........................38 Case Study 18: Bird Conservation in Kokkare Bellur,Karnataka, India ..................................................................40 Case Study 19:The Ibex Conservation Plan, Hushey Valley Conservation Area, Pakistan ......................................42 Case Study 20: Prawn Farming at Rekawa Lagoon, Sri Lanka ..............................................................................44 Case Study 21: Annapurna Conservation Area Project, Nepal ................................................................................45 6. SOUTH EAST ASIA ..................................................................................................................................................48 Case Study 22: Participatory monitoring in Lao P.D.R...........................................................................................48 Case Study 23: Co-Management of Mekong River Inland Aquatic Resources, Lao P.D.R. ....................................50 Case Study 24: Community-Based Fisheries Co-Management and Protected Areas Management, Lao P.D.R......52 7. CENTRAL AMERICA................................................................................................................................................54 Case Study 25: Management of Turtle Eggs in Ostional, Costa Rica ......................................................................55 Case Study 26: Management of Green Iguanas in Nicaragua ................................................................................56 8. SOUTH AMERICA ....................................................................................................................................................57 Case Study 26:Vicuña Management in Peru ..........................................................................................................58 Case Study 27: Mamirauá Sustainable Development Reserve, Brazil......................................................................60 Case Study 28: The Cofan Ecotourism Project, Ecuador........................................................................................62 iii iv 1. Introduction Evaluating Eden The Evaluating Eden initiative evolved from a previous study in 1994 by IIED which reviewed mainly African wildlife management literature and CWM initiatives and analysed top-down and participatory approaches. The study was published as “Whose Eden? An Overview of Community Approaches to Wildlife Management”. Whose Eden? highlighted the fact that most donors accept CWM as the ‘right’ approach, but that this support is often based on untested assumptions and in response to a) the realisation that most countries lack the resources to enforce conservation laws; b) a generally increasing recognition that top-down approaches are morally unacceptable; c) a search for economic development options that would not result in biodiversity loss. However, the study also noted that there was very little empirical evidence demonstrating whether, in fact, such initiatives have succeeded in achieving their goals and that research was urgently required on the environ- mental, social and economic impacts of community wildlife management. For example, has the abundance of wildlife increased in a particular area as a result of a CWM initiative? Have house- hold economies improved and can this be attributed to a CWM initiative? The Evaluating Eden research programme was established to move beyond the literature, to extend the geographical scope of Whose Eden? and to provide a global perspective on the impacts and achievements of CWM. The Evaluating Eden project aims to address three overall research questions: 1. What has CWM achieved for wildlife and for people? 2. How do social, political, economic and environmental factors influence the efficacy of CWM? 3. What are the key characteristics of successful CWM and how can these be spread? The overall findings of the project are presented in the Overview Report to this series (Roe et al 2000). In the first phase of Evaluating Eden, desk-based reviews of the status of CWM were commis- sioned in eight regions: West Africa, Central Africa, East Africa, Southern Africa, South Asia, South East Asia, Central America and South America. In addition two country reviews were carried out in Australia and Canada, providing an additional and valuable perspective to the project. The regional teams then went on to explore some of the issues raised in these reviews in a series of case studies based on original fieldwork. Some of the case studies are included in the various regional reports that have been published in this series. Others have been published as discussion papers by IIED or research partners. More remain unpublished and available only as “grey” literature. The purpose of this volume is to provide the reader with detailed summaries of all the Evaluating Eden case studies and to point them in the direction of further information. 1 What is CWM? We interpret community-based wildlife management (CWM) as the regulated use of wildlife popu- lations and ecosystems by local ‘stakeholders’. Local stakeholders may be a village, or group of villages; an individual, or group of individuals with a shared interest in the resource. The important factor is not how the community is defined, but the fact that stewardship over wildlife resides at the local rather than the state level. Our definition of CWM encompasses or overlaps with a number of similar terms and approaches (Table 1.1). Table 1.1: CWM – related terms and definitions Term Definition Community-based Conservation by, for and with the local community(Western and Wright 1994). conservation Community A broad spectrum of new management arrangements by people who are not agents of the conservation state, but who, by virtue of their collective location and activities are critically placed
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Meas, Conservation and Conflict: a Case Study of Virunga National Park
    © 2008 International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) Published by the International Institute for Sustainable Development MEAs, Conservation and Conflict The International Institute for Sustainable Development contributes to sustainable development by advancing policy recommendations on international trade and investment, economic policy, climate change, A case study of Virunga Nationalmeasurement Park, and DRCassessmen t, and natural resources management. Through the Internet, we report on international negotiations and share knowledge gained through collaborative projects with global partners, resulting in more rigorous research, capacity building in developing countries and better dialogue between North and South. IISD’s vision is better living for all— sustainably; its mission is to champion innovation, enabling societies to live sustainably. IISD is registered as a charitable Alec Crawford organization in Canada and has 501(c)(3) status in the United States. IISD receives core Johannah Bernstein operating support from the Government of Canada, provided through the Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA), the International Development Research Centre October 2008 (IDRC) and Environment Canada; and from the Province of Manitoba. The institute receives project funding from numerous governments inside and outside Canada, United Nations agencies, foundations and the priate sector. International Institute for Sustainable Development 161 Portage Avenue East, 6th Floor Winnipeg, Manitoba Canada R3B 0Y4 Tel: +1 (204) 958–7700 Fax: +1 (204) 958–7710 © 2008 International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) Published by the International Institute for MEAs, Conservation Sustainable Development and Conflict The International Institute for Sustainable Development contributes to sustainable A case study of Virunga development by advancing policy recommendations on international trade and investment, economic National Park, DRC policy, climate change, measurement and assessment, and natural resources management.
    [Show full text]
  • Confirmed Soc Reports List 2015-2016
    Confirmed State of Conservation Reports for natural and mixed World Heritage sites 2015 - 2016 Nr Region Country Site Natural or Additional information mixed site 1 LAC Argentina Iguazu National Park Natural 2 APA Australia Tasmanian Wilderness Mixed 3 EURNA Belarus / Poland Bialowieza Forest Natural 4 LAC Belize Belize Barrier Reef Reserve System Natural World Heritage in Danger 5 AFR Botswana Okavango Delta Natural 6 LAC Brazil Iguaçu National Park Natural 7 LAC Brazil Cerrado Protected Areas: Chapada dos Veadeiros and Natural Emas National Parks 8 EURNA Bulgaria Pirin National Park Natural 9 AFR Cameroon Dja Faunal Reserve Natural 10 EURNA Canada Gros Morne National Park Natural 11 AFR Central African Republic Manovo-Gounda St Floris National Park Natural World Heritage in Danger 12 LAC Costa Rica / Panama Talamanca Range-La Amistad Reserves / La Amistad Natural National Park 13 AFR Côte d'Ivoire Comoé National Park Natural World Heritage in Danger 14 AFR Côte d'Ivoire / Guinea Mount Nimba Strict Nature Reserve Natural World Heritage in Danger 15 AFR Democratic Republic of the Congo Garamba National Park Natural World Heritage in Danger 16 AFR Democratic Republic of the Congo Kahuzi-Biega National Park Natural World Heritage in Danger 17 AFR Democratic Republic of the Congo Okapi Wildlife Reserve Natural World Heritage in Danger 18 AFR Democratic Republic of the Congo Salonga National Park Natural World Heritage in Danger 19 AFR Democratic Republic of the Congo Virunga National Park Natural World Heritage in Danger 20 AFR Democratic
    [Show full text]
  • The Main Vegetation Types of Kaokoland, Northern Damaraland and a Description of Some Transects of Owambo, Etosha and North Western South West Africa
    THE MAIN VEGETATION TYPES OF KAOKOLAND, NORTHERN DAMARALAND AND A DESCRIPTION OF SOME TRANSECTS OF OWAMBO, ETOSHA AND NORTH WESTERN SOUTH WEST AFRICA Rui Ildegario de Sousa Correia June 1976 ~ € id Tdi MAIN VEGETATION TYPES OF KAOKOLAND, NORTHERN DAMARALAND AND A DESCRIPTION OF SOME TRANSECTS OF OWAMBO, ETOSHA AND NORTH WESTERN SOUT WEST AFRICA The general ecological conditions that influence the vege- tation types of the study area have already been described in a previous report. The main factor influencing vegetation here, is rainfall. Topography plays a very important paralel role related with an additional distribution of rainwater by the superficial drainage of hills and mountains to the neighbouring flats " and slopes. Concerning the soils, it appears that the physical structure is of more importance than the chemical composition, as this (the structure) determines the availability of water for root development. - Iu some specific instances the soil seems to have a marked effect on the vegetation such as the superficial calcareous layer in south-eastern Kaokoland. The influence of the watersheds is also well marked in deter- mining vegetation types, whether floristic or physiognomic. In addition both physiognomic features and floristic composi- tion have been used to determine the boundaries of the various vegetation types as described. Judicious use/..... ‘co Judicious use was also made of "indicator" species, whether by its occurence or by its absence. The following have been used-<« Baikeea plurijuga - Typical of red “alahari sands in the me~- dian and higher rainfall areas (300 - 700 mm/2),“- Spirostachys africane - Usually appears on the edge of pans (such as Owambo and Southern Angola) and along seasonal rockey c : or sandy dry water courses exept in the desert country courses.
    [Show full text]
  • State of Conservation of the Properties Inscribed on the List of World Heritage in Danger
    World Heritage 37 COM WHC-13/37.COM/7A.Add Paris, 17 May 2013 Original: English / French UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION CONVENTION CONCERNING THE PROTECTION OF THE WORLD CULTURAL AND NATURAL HERITAGE WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE Thirty-seventh session Phnom Penh, Cambodia 16-27 June 2013 Item 7A of the Provisional Agenda: State of conservation of the properties inscribed on the List of World Heritage in Danger SUMMARY In accordance with Section IV B, paragraphs 190-191 of the Operational Guidelines, the Committee shall review annually the state of conservation of properties inscribed on the List of World Heritage in Danger. This review shall include such monitoring procedures and expert missions as might be determined necessary by the Committee. This document contains information on the state of conservation of properties inscribed on the List of World Heritage in Danger. The World Heritage Committee is requested to review the reports on the state of conservation of properties contained in this document. The full reports of reactive monitoring missions requested by the World Heritage Committee are available at the following Web address in their original language: http://whc.unesco.org/en/sessions/37COM/ All previous state of conservation reports are available through the World Heritage State of conservation Information System at the following Web address: http://whc.unesco.org/en/soc Decision required: The Committee is requested to review the following state of conservation reports. The Committee may wish to adopt the draft Decision presented at the end of each state of conservation report. TABLE OF CONTENT I. STATE OF CONSERVATION REPORTS .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa Report: Volume 2
    VOLUME TWO Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa Report The report of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission was presented to President Nelson Mandela on 29 October 1998. Archbishop Desmond Tutu Ms Hlengiwe Mkhize Chairperson Dr Alex Boraine Mr Dumisa Ntsebeza Vice-Chairperson Ms Mary Burton Dr Wendy Orr Revd Bongani Finca Adv Denzil Potgieter Ms Sisi Khampepe Dr Fazel Randera Mr Richard Lyster Ms Yasmin Sooka Mr Wynand Malan* Ms Glenda Wildschut Dr Khoza Mgojo * Subject to minority position. See volume 5. Chief Executive Officer: Dr Biki Minyuku I CONTENTS Chapter 1 Chapter 6 National Overview .......................................... 1 Special Investigation The Death of President Samora Machel ................................................ 488 Chapter 2 The State outside Special Investigation South Africa (1960-1990).......................... 42 Helderberg Crash ........................................... 497 Special Investigation Chemical and Biological Warfare........ 504 Chapter 3 The State inside South Africa (1960-1990).......................... 165 Special Investigation Appendix: State Security Forces: Directory Secret State Funding................................... 518 of Organisations and Structures........................ 313 Special Investigation Exhumations....................................................... 537 Chapter 4 The Liberation Movements from 1960 to 1990 ..................................................... 325 Special Investigation Appendix: Organisational structures and The Mandela United
    [Show full text]
  • Namibia a Violation of Trust
    AN OXFAM REPORT ON INTERNATIONAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR POVERTY IN NAMIBIA M Y First Published 1986 ©Oxfam 1986 ISBN 0 85598 0761 Printed in Great Britain by Express Litho Service (Oxford) Published by Oxfam 274 Banbury Road Oxford 0X2 7DZ United Kingdom This book converted to digital file in 2010 Acknowledgements My main thanks must go to all the Namibian people who generously gave their time and expertise to help with the research for this book, particularly Oxfam friends and partners. I am also grateful to the Overseas Development Administration, the Foreign & Commonwealth Office, the Catholic Institute for International Relations and the Namibian Support Committee for their assistance in providing information. Thanks are especially due for the time and advice given by all those who read and commented on the drafts. In particular, I am grateful to Richard Moorsom who helped with both research and editing, and to Justin Ellis, Julio Faundez, Peter Katjavivi, Prudence Smith, Paul Spray and Brian Wood. This book reflects the collective experience of Oxfam's work in Namibia over the past twenty-two years and I have therefore relied on the active collaboration of Oxfam staff and trustees. Sue Coxhead deserves special thanks for her help with research and typing. Finally, without the special help with childcare given by Mandy Bristow, Caroline Lovick and Prudence Smith, the book would never have seen the light of day. Susanna Smith March 1986 ANGOLA A M B I A 3*S^_5 Okavango Si Swamp .or Map 1: Namibia and its neighbours Map 2: Namibia B OTSWANA frontiers restricted areas 'homelands' tar roads AT LANTIC «~ other roads OCEAN railways rivers Luderi I capital city A main towns A mines: 1 TSUMEB copper/lead 2 ROSSING uranium 3 ORANJEMUNO diamonds Oranjemu Scale: 100 200 miles AFRICA Adapted from The Namibians, the Minority Rights Group report no.
    [Show full text]
  • The Risks of NOT KNOWING.. Travelling in Kaokoland/Damaraland
    The risks of NOT KNOWING.. Travelling in Kaokoland/Damaraland. Authors/Contributors to this document amongst others and in no particular order Tony Robertson, Robert Shadforth, Andre Brummer, Paulo Narcisi, Andy Chase, Wynand Pretorius, Jan Joubert, Herbie Hellstrom, Piet Steenkamp, Hienner Dillman, Pieter Hesingla For members of www.tracks4africa.com Date 2006.05.23 1. NOT KNOWING that this is a Malaria area and that there different types, some of which can kill you (within hours) if not promptly treated. There are only three rules for malaria: · Don’t let the little beasts bite you · Don’t let the little beasts bite you · Don’t let the little beasts bite you Prior to visiting a Malaria area, consult your Doctor, then strictly adhere to the agreed action plan. During and after visiting treat any Flu like symptoms as the onset of a malaria attack and treat accordingly. T4A Medical Advisor and expert on Malaria Paolo Narcisi mailto:[email protected] 2. NOT KNOWING that daytime temperatures in these parts of Namibia can exceed 60 degrees Celsius.. that in case something goes wrong with the car you must carry enough drinking water. · To carry enough water is far more important than to carry enough fuel. 3. NOT KNOWING that without good maps and a good understanding of how to use them it is easy to get lost, run out of fuel and die of thirst or starvation (May 2003). 4. NOT KNOWING that driving on soft sand (riverbeds) requires lowering tyre pressure to 50% normal pressure... and as the day gets hotter, the sand gets softer, your speed is slower and your fuel consumption is higher.
    [Show full text]
  • Protecting the Endangered Okapi, and It's Habitat, in the Democratic
    The Okapi Wildlife Reserve Biodiversity of the Congo Okapi Conservation Project works with the Institute in The Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), the Congo for the Conservation of Nature (ICCN), a most biologically diverse country in Africa, holds government organization responsible for the infinite natural treasures and significant species protection of the Reserve, and communities such as Grauer’s gorilla, forest elephants and throughout the Okapi Wildlife Reserve to ensure bonobo. Over 1,500 types of plants and animals, the protection of the okapi and many other species including the okapi, are found nowhere else in the in this equatorial rainforest. world. Okapi Wildlife Reserve Democratic Republic of Congo OCP provides logistical and financial support to 110 ICCN rangers to provide a conservation presence in the region and to monitor land use changes and Protecting the Endangered Okapi, protect the wildlife and natural resources of the Okapi and it’s habitat, in the Wildlife Reserve. Democratic Republic of Congo OCP presently employs 58 people, working from four locations around the Reserve, who implement education programs through meetings, seminars, and providing social assistance that moves communities to care PROGRAMS about conserving resources and wildlife. Okapi Conservation Project (OCP) works in the OCP focuses on developing an economic heart of the and educational foundation Democratic on which the Reserve can Republic of operate. This is achieved Congo to through programs in wildlife protect the protection and education, natural agroforestry, and habitat of the community assistance. endangered Broad-based community okapi and assistance includes: indigenous DONATE TO HELP SAVE THE OKAPI l Mbuti pygmies Building and supplying OCP is represented by Wildlife Conservation schools and health clinics living in the Okapi Wildlife Reserve.
    [Show full text]
  • Othithiya Namibia 2016
    Othithiya Namibia 2016 Number of Days: 15 Dates: 08/02-22/02 Dates are flexible Number of Kilometres: +/- 4000 Places: Namib Naukluft Park, Sossusvlei, Sesriem Canyon, Walvis Bay, Swakopmund, Cape Cross, Damaraland, Opuwo (Kaokoland), Epupa Falls, Etosha National Park, Waterberg, Erindi Game reserve Price per person: 1 470 EURO PER PERSON (2 Person in the car) 1 090 EURO PER PERSON (4 Person in the car) Price Includes: 4x4 Car hire with zero excess fees, accommodation costs with breakfast in hotels, lodges, airport transfers, Camping equipment’s, roof top tents or tent on the ground ( as desired)GPS with maps, refrigerator & detailed itinerary/programme. Price does not include: Airline tickets, meals not specified, park fees, fuel costs, & all items not specified. *Price is subject to the amount of participants, accommodation standard and the duration of the trip. www.namibia.com.pl Day 1 08-02-2016 Travel time 1 hour Distance: 45 km Windhoek Airport – Windhoek On the first day – We will pick you up from the airport and then transfer you to Windhoek. We will discuss the itinerary; get fully briefed on the vehicle and camping equipment. We will then do the last minute grocery shopping. First overnight accommodation will be determined according to your wishes. This will be either in Windhoek or just outside Windhoek in the surrounding areas. After shopping, the entire afternoon you will free to rest or visit the city of Windhoek. Day 2 &3 09 & 10-02-2016 Travel time 6 hours Distance: 358km Windhoek – Namib Naukluft We will depart Windhoek and head towards Sesriem, travelling mostly on gravel roads.
    [Show full text]
  • As Workers Set Strike Ultimatum
    * TODAY: L~TEST ElECTION rNF'O * SEAl-SLAYING SLAMMED * WHITE MAIZE ~ARNING * as workers set strike ultimatum MBATJIUA NGAVIRUE I;-.~ .>.:,.~~ '~~~ ::·:"r··' .-: ,'; .. ~ ".:' .~ ~ '. :- ___:~ ~-~"",,' ~'~ <... .' 'F-:' ,;:-: . :. :. '" ~ .', :':"'~ - .' .:. A WHOPPING 80 per cent vote in favour [ ~;'~lti:~~c:~~s'_ '< '~':~:. _ - .. ~:.~' . ~~ _'::-':'~;; :-~;~~j,: ,-'-':~ -. '-'~~~~ . :.:~-. :: .. :- ,': ',}", .'~ ~ - .:- ~-: . 'p'> of a strike at the CDM diamond mine has brought the prospect of a long and bruis­ TOM,MINNEY ing confrontation between the company PROBLEMS IN world dia­ and workers at the mine a step closer. mond markets are set to The ballot, which teok at crippling the economy of force Namibia's Consoli­ place on Tuesday, brought Namibia. dated Diamond Mines ini­ a result of 80,55 per cent in If a strike is declared at tially to store a quarter of favour of a strike, only 2,53 the mine it could be all ex­ the normal value of stones per cent workers against a tremely long, drawn-out which it usually sells each strike, 0,23 per cent spoilt affair as CDM is believed year. papers and 16,69 abstentions. to have the financial re­ The .stockpile is set to start Shortly after the results sources to withstand strike from this month and could grow became known, the Mine­ action for some time. at more than R200 million a year according to press esti­ workers' Union of Namibia The Central Selling Or­ mates ofCDM's yearly sales, (MUN) gave CDM seven ganisation, through which The move is set to lop large calendar days to "drastically CDM sens its production, is sums off diamond export duty, revise its unrealistic and already sitting on a huge which was forecast in the unreasonable wage offer of stocJcpile of diamonds which Government budget this year 9,5 per cent".
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera Fauna of Namibia. I. Seasonal Distribution of Moths of the Koakoland (Mopane) Savanna in Ogongo, Northern Namibia
    FRAGMENTA FAUNISTICA 57 (2): 117–129, 2014 PL ISSN 0015-9301 © MUSEUM AND INSTITUTE OF ZOOLOGY PAS DOI 10.3161/00159301FF2014.57.2.117 Lepidoptera fauna of Namibia. I. Seasonal distribution of moths of the Koakoland (Mopane) Savanna in Ogongo, northern Namibia Grzegorz KOPIJ Department of Wildlife Management, University of Namibia, Katima Mulilio Campus, Private Bag 1096, Katima Mulilo, Namibia; e-mail: [email protected] Abstract: During the years 2011–2013, moths were collected in Koakoland (Mopane) Savanna in the Cuvelai Drainage System, Ovamboland, northern Namibia. In total, 77 species from 13 families have been identified. Their seasonal occurrence in this habitat was also investigated, with most species recorded in wet season between September and April, but with clear peak in February and March. The family Noctuidae was by far the most speciose (38 recorded species), followed by Crambidae (8 spp.), Sphingidae (6 spp.) and Arctiidae (4 spp.). All other families were represented by 1–3 species. For each species listed date of collection is given, and data on its global distribution. Key words: Lepidoptera, check-list, biodiversity, distribution, moths, Ovamboland INTRODUCTION According to recent quite precise estimate, there are 15 5181 species, 16 650 genera and 121 families of Lepidoptera worldwide (Pouge 2009). Lepidoptera fauna of Namibia has recently attracted attention of European entomologists. However, thorough surveys were conducted hitherto in a few areas only, such as Brandberg and Hobatere. The northern regions of the country were especially badly neglected. In southern Africa (south of Zambezi and Kunene Rivers) – 8 511 species, 2 368 genera and 89 families were recently catalogued (Vári et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Report to the Survival Service Commission, IUCN and The
    Elephant Volume 1 | Issue 4 Article 15 12-15-1980 Report to the Survival Service Commission, IUCN and the Endangered Wildlife Trust: Kaokoland, South West Africa / Namibia Clive Walker Endangered Wildlife Trust of South Africa Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/elephant Recommended Citation Walker, C. (1980). Report to the Survival Service Commission, IUCN and the Endangered Wildlife Trust: Kaokoland, South West Africa / Namibia. Elephant, 1(4), 161-163. Doi: 10.22237/elephant/1521731752 This Brief Notes / Report is brought to you for free and open access by the Open Access Journals at DigitalCommons@WayneState. It has been accepted for inclusion in Elephant by an authorized editor of DigitalCommons@WayneState. Fall 1980 WALKER - EWT: KAOKOLAND 161 REPORT TO THE SURVIVAL SERVICE COMMISSION, IUCN AND THE ENDANGERED WILDLIFE TRUST: KAOKOLAND, SOUTH WEST AFRICA / NAMIBIA* by Clive Walker It is with the utmost urgency that I draw your attention to my recent visit to Kaokoland with Professor F.C. Eloff's expedition during September 1978, with the University of Pretoria, South Africa. Kaokoland is in the northwestern part of South West Africa/Namibia and covers an area of some 5½ million hectares (22,000 square miles) and at present is under the control of the South African Government and falls under the Minister of Plural Relations, Dr. C. Mulder. The most striking topographic feature of the region is the many mountains, from the dolomite hills in the south to the stark ridges and isolated eminences rising from the highland plains and to the towering peaks of the Northern Baynes and Otjihipa ranges.
    [Show full text]