DOCSLIB.ORG

Major Trollope and the Eastern Caprivi Zipfel One Night As He Lay

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Major Trollope and the Eastern Caprivi Zipfel One Night As He Lay Conference Paper for ABORNE 2009. Please do not cite vilify or pillage without at least talking to me. Beyond the Last Frontier: Major Trollope and the Eastern Caprivi Zipfel One night as he lay sleeping on the veranda of his residence in Katima Mulilo Major L.F.W. Trollope, the Native Commissioner and Resident Magistrate for the Eastern Caprivi Zipfel, was attacked by a nineteen year old wielding an axe. Major Trollope survived the attack and the assailant was soon arrested, but in the subsequent trial the “plum posting” that Trollope had created on the furthermost frontier of South African rule came crashing down. The trial brought to the fore that Trollope lived beyond the control of the South African administration to which he was formally subject, and that instead he had become enmeshed in the administrations of Northern Rhodesia and the Bechuanaland Protectorate. Originally appointed to Katima Mulilo to enforce South African rule in the Eastern Caprivi Zipfel, Trollope increasingly established his own fiefdom on the outer fringes of South African rule, and became evermore integrated in the administrations of countries beyond the borders of South Africa. By the time of his demise, Trollope ruled the Eastern Caprivi Zipfel in a manner that had more in keeping with the academically schooled coterie of District Commissioners of Northern Rhodesia and the Bechuanaland Protectorate, than that it bore relation to the apartheid securocrats of the South African Bantu Affairs Department to which he was nominally subject. Beyond the frontier Even amongst the arbitrarily drawn borders of Africa, the borders of the Namibian Caprivi strip are a striking anomaly jutting 500 kilometres into the African continent. Determined in the boardrooms of Europe as part of an exchange between the British and German Empires, the Caprivi strip was designed to enable the German protectorate of South West Africa access to trade and traffic on the Zambesi river; an exchange determined by maps and not necessarily the reality of navigable rivers.1 Beginning with the establishment of the German protectorate through to the establishment of the 1 For a clear and detailed introduction to the Eastern Caprivi and Katima Mulilo in particular see, Wolfgang Zeller, “Danger and Opportunity in Katima Mulilo: A Namibian Border Boomtown at Transnational Crossroads”, Journal of Southern African Studies, Volume 35, Number 1, March 2009, pp. 133 – 154. An overview of German and British administration prior to 1956 see, Major L.F.W. Trollope, “The Eastern Caprivi Zipfel”, The Northern Rhodesia Journal, Volume III, Number 2, 1956, pp. 107 – 118. A description of the Caprivi in the heyday of apartheid see, Professor Richard F. Logan, “The People of the Eastern Caprivi”, S.W.A. Jaarboek 1972, pp. 149 - 152. 1 Conference Paper for ABORNE 2009. Please do not cite vilify or pillage without at least talking to me. independent Namibian state, the Caprivi strip has consistently existed beyond the collective imagination of the Namibian state. That the Caprivi strip exists as something of an embarrassment and inconvenient appendage to the country as a whole can be gauged by the manner in which successive Namibian administrations have sought to portray the strip on its maps. The Kriegskarte von Deutsch-Sudwestafrika [war-map of German South West Africa] published by Dietrich Reimer in Berlin in 1904 completely ignores the Caprivi.2 To be fair, between 1904 and 1908, the German administration had more than enough on its hands with the wars in central and southern Namibia to be overly concerned with the cartography of the Caprivi strip. None the less, the Kriegskarte set the standard for a large scale map of the territory as a whole. The famous “farm-map” of Namibia which has been printed in consecutive runs in a scale of 1 : 1 000 000 since 1921, portrays the Caprivi, not as an integral part of Namibia, but as a separate entity in a scale of 1 : 2 000 000.3 The maps published after Namibian independence in 1990 have not been changed and the latest published by the Surveyor General in Windhoek in 2007 continues to represent the marginal nature of Caprivi by representing the territory as a separate entity, in half the scale of the rest of Namibia. The marginality of the Caprivi in relation to the newly independent Republic of Namibia came to a head in August 1999 when armed members of the Caprivi Liberation Front, staged an insurrection and attempted to secede from the Republic.4 Unfortunately for the secessionists they failed to secure the military airport at Mpacha near Katima Mulilo and the Namibian government was able to fly in military forces to suppress the secession. In the subsequent military operations Caprivians were given to understand that whatever their marginal status, they were subject and answerable to the Namibian state. Units of the Namibian Army, Police, and the Special Field Force in particular arrested, 2 Originally published as Kriegskarte von Deutsch-Sudwestafrika 1 : 800 000, Berlin: Dietrich Reimer Verlag 1904. Republished in 1994 by the National Archives of Namibia. 3 On the history of the “farm-map” see, Giorgio Miescher, “Visualising Space and Colonial Settlement: The so called “Farm Map” as an Icon of Settler Historiography”, paper presented at the second AEGIS conference held in Leiden, 12 July 2007. 4 CLF refers to Trollope in its propaganda seeking to justify its specific status separate from the nation state of Namibia. 2 Conference Paper for ABORNE 2009. Please do not cite vilify or pillage without at least talking to me. beat and tortured hundreds of people.5 Four years after the event at least 130 people were still being held without trial, at least eleven had died in detention, and at least five were being held incommunicado at a detention centre over fifteen hundred kilometres away in the vicinity of Mariental in southern Namibia.6 Establishing and maintaining an administrative presence Following its establishment on paper in 1890, it was not until 1909 that the German Empire actually established an on the ground presence in the eastern Caprivi Zipfel.7 Essentially an enormous triangle of land defined by the Rio Cuando (under its multiple names of Mashi, Linyanti and Chobe) as it flows south and then north-east to its confluence with the Zambezi, the eastern Caprivi Zipfel is an enormous area of land that consists of forested Kalahari sands and extensive marshes subject to annual flooding. Not surprisingly the area was and is host to extensive stocks of wildlife, and the territory was long contested between various powers anxious to control access to the area’s bountiful hunting products. Also known as the Linyanti, the territory has come to form the basis for innumerable hunting and trading legends.8 Whilst both the Bulozi and Batawana kingdoms contested access to the Linyanti in the second half of the nineteenth century, numerous European hunters made names for themselves in the area.9 Frederick Courtney Selous’s companion French died in a hunting accident in the Linyanti in the 1880’s. In1906 Arnold Hodson (at that stage Assistant Resident Magistrate but later Governor of Sierra Leone) accompanied Resident Commissioner Sir Ralph Williams, on what was essentially a hunting trip to the 5 The Special Field Force falls within the terms of the 1990 Police Act. However, unlike the regular police, no educational requirements are necessary for membership of the SFF. The SFF has come to be staffed primarily by PLAN (people’s liberation army of Namibia) veterans and political appointees. During operations in Caprivi they reported directly to the Head of State and not to the Minister of Home Affairs, whereby any parliamentary supervision was removed. 6 Full details regarding the insurrection are to be found in, Amnesty International, Namibia: Justice Delayed is Justice Denied; The Caprivi Treason Trial, August 2003. 7 As regards the intricacies of the German presence in the Eastern Caprivi, Maria Fisch, Der Caprivizipfel während der deutschen Zeit, 1890 – 1914, Köln: Rüdiger Köppe Verlag, 1996. 8 Hugh Macmillan notes how the establishment of German and British rule “complicated the Susman brothers’trading relations with people in the two territories where trade had been unregulated”. Hugh Macmillan, An African Trading Empire: The Story fo Susman Brothers & Wulfsohn, 1901 – 2005, London: I.B. Tauris, 2005, p. 102. 9 Thomas Tlou, A History of Ngamiland 1750 to 1906: The Formation of an African State, Gaborone: Macmillan 1985. Barry C. Morton, A Social and Economic History of a Southern African Native Reserve: Ngamiland, 1890 – 1966, PhD Department of History Indiana University 1996. 3 Conference Paper for ABORNE 2009. Please do not cite vilify or pillage without at least talking to me. Linyanti.10 On this trip Hodson’s party came upon a hunting party led by Europeans that had been hunting in the Linyanti, essentially territory subject to Imperial Germany, albeit that there was no official German presence in the area.11 The hunting must have been particularly good, for four years later in 1910 Hodson guided the highest British official in southern Africa, High Commissioner Lord Selbourne to the Linyanti, and once again the British officials crossed over and hunted in what was essentially German territory.12 In 1914 the Eastern Caprivi was occupied by Rhodesian Troops guided by the cattle trader Harry Susman, becoming “the first Allied occupation of enemy territory in the Great War”.13 Administration was undertaken by the British authorities in Bechuanaland Protectorate with the area falling under the District Commissioner Kasane. Throughout the 1920s and early 1930s the area remained bereft of any form of colonial administration. As such the territory formed a magnet for poachers and hunters anxious to make a living out of the sale of dried meat, hides and ivory.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Immediate and Long-Term Effects of Namibia's Colonization Process
    The Immediate and Long-Term Effects of Namibia’s Colonization Process By: Jonathan Baker Honors Capstone Through Professor Taylor Politics of Sub-Saharan Africa Baker, 2 Table of Contents I. Authors Note II. Introduction III. Pre-Colonization IV. Colonization by Germany V. Colonization by South Africa VI. The Struggle for Independence VII. The Decolonization Process VIII. Political Changes- A Reaction to Colonization IX. Immediate Economic Changes Brought on by Independence X. Long Term Political Effects (of Colonization) XI. Long Term Cultural Effects XII. Long Term Economic Effects XIII. Prospects for the Future XIV. Conclusion XV. Bibliography XVI. Appendices Baker, 3 I. Author’s Note I learned such a great deal from this entire honors capstone project, that all the knowledge I have acquired can hardly be covered by what I wrote in these 50 pages. I learned so much more that I was not able to share both about Namibia and myself. I can now claim that I am knowledgeable about nearly all areas of Namibian history and life. I certainly am no expert, but after all of this research I can certainly consider myself reliable. I have never had such an extensive knowledge before of one academic area as a result of a school project. I also learned a lot about myself through this project. I learned how I can motivate myself to work, and I learned how I perform when I have to organize such a long and complicated paper, just to name a couple of things. The strange inability to be able to include everything I learned from doing this project is the reason for some of the more random appendices at the end, as I have a passion for both numbers and trivia.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluating Eden by IIED
    Evaluating Eden Series No 9 STORIES FROM EDEN Case studies of Community- Based Wildlife Management Compiled by Dilys Roe and Margaret Jack April 2001 ii Contents 1. INTRODUCTION..........................................................................................................................................................1 Evaluating Eden ........................................................................................................................................................1 What is CWM? ..........................................................................................................................................................2 2. CENTRAL AND WEST AFRICA................................................................................................................................5 Case Study 1: Kilum-Ijim Forest Project, Cameroon ................................................................................................6 Case Study 2: Okapi Wildlife Reserve and Garamba National Park, Democratic Republic of Congo ........................7 Case Study 3:Transition Zone to the West Region Biosphere Reserve, Niger............................................................8 Case Study 4: Gashaka Gumti National Park, Nigeria ............................................................................................10 3. EAST AFRICA............................................................................................................................................................12 Case Study 5:Western
    [Show full text]
  • COMMITTEE AGAINST TORTURE in Connection with Consideration of Second Periodic Report by Namibia
    SPECIAL SHADOW REPORT SUDMITTED TO: COMMITTEE AGAINST TORTURE In Connection With Consideration of Second Periodic Report by Namibia NAMIBIA AS A TORTURE EMPTIRE WINDHOEK NAMIBIA OCTOBER 11 2016 ABOUT NAMRIGHTS INC Formerly known as National Society for Human Rights (“NSHR”), NamRights Inc (hereinafter “NamRights”) is a private, independent, non-partisan and non-profit making human rights monitoring and advocacy organization. Founded on December 1 1989 by concerned citizens, the Organization envisages a world free of human rights violations. Its mission is to stop human rights violations in Namibia and the rest of the world. NamRights bases its legal existence on the provisions of Article 21(1) (e) of the Namibian Constitution as well as Article 71 of the UN Charter, read with Economic and Social Council Resolutions 1296 (XLIV) and E/1996/31. The Organization is lawfully registered in terms of Section 21(a) of the Companies Act 1973 (Act 61 of 1973), as amended, as an association incorporated not for gain. Both African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights of African Union (in 1993) and UN Economic and Social Council (in 1997) recognize NamRights as a bona fide human rights organization truly concerned with matters in their respective competence. The organization can be reached via this address: NamRights Liberty Center 116 John Meinert Street Windhoek-West P. O. Box 23592 Windhoek Namibia Tel: +264 61 236 183/+264 61 253 447/+264 61 238 711 Fax: +264 88 640 669/+264 61 234 286 Mobile: +264 811 406 888 E-mail1: [email protected] E-mail2: [email protected] Web: www.nshr.org.na 2 I.
    [Show full text]
  • The Main Vegetation Types of Kaokoland, Northern Damaraland and a Description of Some Transects of Owambo, Etosha and North Western South West Africa
    THE MAIN VEGETATION TYPES OF KAOKOLAND, NORTHERN DAMARALAND AND A DESCRIPTION OF SOME TRANSECTS OF OWAMBO, ETOSHA AND NORTH WESTERN SOUTH WEST AFRICA Rui Ildegario de Sousa Correia June 1976 ~ € id Tdi MAIN VEGETATION TYPES OF KAOKOLAND, NORTHERN DAMARALAND AND A DESCRIPTION OF SOME TRANSECTS OF OWAMBO, ETOSHA AND NORTH WESTERN SOUT WEST AFRICA The general ecological conditions that influence the vege- tation types of the study area have already been described in a previous report. The main factor influencing vegetation here, is rainfall. Topography plays a very important paralel role related with an additional distribution of rainwater by the superficial drainage of hills and mountains to the neighbouring flats " and slopes. Concerning the soils, it appears that the physical structure is of more importance than the chemical composition, as this (the structure) determines the availability of water for root development. - Iu some specific instances the soil seems to have a marked effect on the vegetation such as the superficial calcareous layer in south-eastern Kaokoland. The influence of the watersheds is also well marked in deter- mining vegetation types, whether floristic or physiognomic. In addition both physiognomic features and floristic composi- tion have been used to determine the boundaries of the various vegetation types as described. Judicious use/..... ‘co Judicious use was also made of "indicator" species, whether by its occurence or by its absence. The following have been used-<« Baikeea plurijuga - Typical of red “alahari sands in the me~- dian and higher rainfall areas (300 - 700 mm/2),“- Spirostachys africane - Usually appears on the edge of pans (such as Owambo and Southern Angola) and along seasonal rockey c : or sandy dry water courses exept in the desert country courses.
    [Show full text]
  • Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa Report: Volume 2
    VOLUME TWO Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa Report The report of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission was presented to President Nelson Mandela on 29 October 1998. Archbishop Desmond Tutu Ms Hlengiwe Mkhize Chairperson Dr Alex Boraine Mr Dumisa Ntsebeza Vice-Chairperson Ms Mary Burton Dr Wendy Orr Revd Bongani Finca Adv Denzil Potgieter Ms Sisi Khampepe Dr Fazel Randera Mr Richard Lyster Ms Yasmin Sooka Mr Wynand Malan* Ms Glenda Wildschut Dr Khoza Mgojo * Subject to minority position. See volume 5. Chief Executive Officer: Dr Biki Minyuku I CONTENTS Chapter 1 Chapter 6 National Overview .......................................... 1 Special Investigation The Death of President Samora Machel ................................................ 488 Chapter 2 The State outside Special Investigation South Africa (1960-1990).......................... 42 Helderberg Crash ........................................... 497 Special Investigation Chemical and Biological Warfare........ 504 Chapter 3 The State inside South Africa (1960-1990).......................... 165 Special Investigation Appendix: State Security Forces: Directory Secret State Funding................................... 518 of Organisations and Structures........................ 313 Special Investigation Exhumations....................................................... 537 Chapter 4 The Liberation Movements from 1960 to 1990 ..................................................... 325 Special Investigation Appendix: Organisational structures and The Mandela United
    [Show full text]
  • Namibia a Violation of Trust
    AN OXFAM REPORT ON INTERNATIONAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR POVERTY IN NAMIBIA M Y First Published 1986 ©Oxfam 1986 ISBN 0 85598 0761 Printed in Great Britain by Express Litho Service (Oxford) Published by Oxfam 274 Banbury Road Oxford 0X2 7DZ United Kingdom This book converted to digital file in 2010 Acknowledgements My main thanks must go to all the Namibian people who generously gave their time and expertise to help with the research for this book, particularly Oxfam friends and partners. I am also grateful to the Overseas Development Administration, the Foreign & Commonwealth Office, the Catholic Institute for International Relations and the Namibian Support Committee for their assistance in providing information. Thanks are especially due for the time and advice given by all those who read and commented on the drafts. In particular, I am grateful to Richard Moorsom who helped with both research and editing, and to Justin Ellis, Julio Faundez, Peter Katjavivi, Prudence Smith, Paul Spray and Brian Wood. This book reflects the collective experience of Oxfam's work in Namibia over the past twenty-two years and I have therefore relied on the active collaboration of Oxfam staff and trustees. Sue Coxhead deserves special thanks for her help with research and typing. Finally, without the special help with childcare given by Mandy Bristow, Caroline Lovick and Prudence Smith, the book would never have seen the light of day. Susanna Smith March 1986 ANGOLA A M B I A 3*S^_5 Okavango Si Swamp .or Map 1: Namibia and its neighbours Map 2: Namibia B OTSWANA frontiers restricted areas 'homelands' tar roads AT LANTIC «~ other roads OCEAN railways rivers Luderi I capital city A main towns A mines: 1 TSUMEB copper/lead 2 ROSSING uranium 3 ORANJEMUNO diamonds Oranjemu Scale: 100 200 miles AFRICA Adapted from The Namibians, the Minority Rights Group report no.
    [Show full text]
  • Paleoecological Reconstruction of Lake Liambezi, Botswana Using Multidisciplinary Proxies
    Geophysical Research Abstracts Vol. 21, EGU2019-9888, 2019 EGU General Assembly 2019 © Author(s) 2019. CC Attribution 4.0 license. Paleoecological reconstruction of Lake Liambezi, Botswana using multidisciplinary proxies Anaël Lehmann (1), Christophe Paul (2), Sevasti Filippidou (2), Léandre Ballif (1), Shannon Dyer (1), Pilar Junier (2), and Torsten Vennemann (1) (1) Institute of Earth Surface Dynamics, Geosciences and Environment, Lausanne, Switzerland, (2) Laboratory of Microbiology, Institute of Biology, Faculty of Science, Neuchâtel, Switzerland Lake Liambezi is located at the Eastern side of Caprivi Strip, straddling the border between Namibia and Botswana. The drainage basin of the lake is a large, flat wetland, including some woodlands, which contains a typically slow-flowing floodplain river (Seaman et al., 1978; Peel et al., 2015). The Lake changes its shape, size, and depth seasonally and over the years due to fluctuating contributions of water from its distinct source regions. The lake forms two elongated basins with a South-West to North-West direction joined by a main channel. The present study is based on multiple methods conducted on the watershed as well as on the lake. The aim is to give a paleoecological interpretation of the lake with isotopic and multi-proxy records. During the two field campaigns conducted during the dry season (September 2016) as well as at the end of the rainy season during March 2017, water from multiple sources of ground and surface waters were collected to better understand the drainage and hydrodynamics (Dyer, 2017). It was also established that the present climate supports a vegetation representing both the C3 and C4 photosynthetic cycles (Ballif, 2018).
    [Show full text]
  • Report to the Survival Service Commission, IUCN and The
    Elephant Volume 1 | Issue 4 Article 15 12-15-1980 Report to the Survival Service Commission, IUCN and the Endangered Wildlife Trust: Kaokoland, South West Africa / Namibia Clive Walker Endangered Wildlife Trust of South Africa Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/elephant Recommended Citation Walker, C. (1980). Report to the Survival Service Commission, IUCN and the Endangered Wildlife Trust: Kaokoland, South West Africa / Namibia. Elephant, 1(4), 161-163. Doi: 10.22237/elephant/1521731752 This Brief Notes / Report is brought to you for free and open access by the Open Access Journals at DigitalCommons@WayneState. It has been accepted for inclusion in Elephant by an authorized editor of DigitalCommons@WayneState. Fall 1980 WALKER - EWT: KAOKOLAND 161 REPORT TO THE SURVIVAL SERVICE COMMISSION, IUCN AND THE ENDANGERED WILDLIFE TRUST: KAOKOLAND, SOUTH WEST AFRICA / NAMIBIA* by Clive Walker It is with the utmost urgency that I draw your attention to my recent visit to Kaokoland with Professor F.C. Eloff's expedition during September 1978, with the University of Pretoria, South Africa. Kaokoland is in the northwestern part of South West Africa/Namibia and covers an area of some 5½ million hectares (22,000 square miles) and at present is under the control of the South African Government and falls under the Minister of Plural Relations, Dr. C. Mulder. The most striking topographic feature of the region is the many mountains, from the dolomite hills in the south to the stark ridges and isolated eminences rising from the highland plains and to the towering peaks of the Northern Baynes and Otjihipa ranges.
    [Show full text]
  • (2014) Alphonso Lisk-Carew: Early Photography in Sierra Leone. Phd
    Crooks, Julie (2014) Alphonso Lisk‐Carew: early photography in Sierra Leone. PhD Thesis. SOAS, University of London http://eprints.soas.ac.uk/18564 Copyright © and Moral Rights for this thesis are retained by the author and/or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non‐commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder/s. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. When referring to this thesis, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given e.g. AUTHOR (year of submission) "Full thesis title", name of the School or Department, PhD Thesis, pagination. Alphonso Lisk-Carew: Early Photography in Sierra Leone Julie Crooks Thesis Submitted for PhD March 2014 Department of the History of Art and Archaeology SOAS University of London © 2014 Julie Crooks All rights reserved Declaration for SOAS PhD thesis I have read and understood regulation 17.9 of the Regulations for students of the SOAS, University of London concerning plagiarism. I undertake that all the material presented for examination is my own work and has not been written for me in whole or in part, by any other person. I also undertake that any quotation or paraphrase from the published or unpublished work of another person has been duly acknowledged in the work which I present for examination.
    [Show full text]
  • S V Mushwena and Others
    CASE NO.: SA 6/2004 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NAMIBIA In the matter between THE STATE APPELLANT versus MOSES LIMBO MUSHWENA 1ST RESPONDENT (ACC 12) FRED MAEMELO ZIEZO 2ND RESPONDENT (ACC 25) ANDREAS MULUPA 3RD RESPONDENT (ACC 26) RICHARD LIBANO MISUHA 4TH RESPONDENT (ACC 48) OSCAR MUYUKA KUSHALUKA PUTEHO 5TH RESPONDENT (ACC 49) RICHARD JOHN SAMATI 6TH RESPONDENT (ACC 53) JOHN SIKUNDEKO SAMBOMA 7TH RESPONDENT (ACC 54) OSBERT MWENYI LIKANYI 8TH RESPONDENT (ACC 57) THADEUS SIYOKA NDALA 9TH RESPONDENT (ACC 70) MARTIN SIYANO TUBAUNDULE 10 TH RESPONDENT (ACC 71) OSCAR NYAMBE PUTEHO 11 TH RESPONDENT (ACC 72) CHARLES MAFENYAHO MUSHAKWA 12 TH RESPONDENT (ACC 73) CHARLES KALIPA SAMBOMA 13 TH RESPONDENT (ACC 119) CORAM: Strydom, ACJ, O'Linn, AJA, Mtambanengwe, AJA, Gibson, AJA et Chomba, AJA. HEARD ON: 10-12/05/2004 DELIVERED ON: ____________________________________________________________________________ APPEAL JUDGMENT ____________________________________________________________________________ 2 MTAMBANENGWE A.J.A.: The state appeals against Hoff J's judgment in favour of the thirteen respondents that the court did not have jurisdiction to try them. The application leading to the court a quo's ruling began as an application on notice of motion supported by various affidavits deposed by the respondents. The notice of motion sought an order declaring inter alia that the respondents apprehension and abduction from Zambia and Botswana respectively, and their subsequent transportation to Namibia and their arrest and detention pursuant thereto was in breach of international law, unlawful and that they had not been properly and lawfully arraigned before the court for trial on the charge preferred against them. The court a quo directed that the notice of motion and the supporting affidavits be regarded as respondents pleas in terms of section 106 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act 57 of 1977, namely that the court a quo had not jurisdiction to try the 13 respondents.
    [Show full text]
  • Complete Paper
    Shanjo and Fwe as Part of Bantu Botatwe: A Diachronic Phonological Approach Koen Bostoen Royal Museum for Central Africa Tervuren - Université libre de Bruxelles 1. Introduction1 Shanjo and Fwe are two small Bantu languages spoken in the southern part of the Western Province of Zambia. The number of Shanjo speakers was estimated at 3,033 in 1960 (Fortune 1963).2 The Shanjo live in scattered communities to the west of the Zambezi, between Sioma and Sesheke. They consider themselves as ethnically distinct from other communities in the Western Province, but their linguistic competence in Shanjo is seriously reduced in favour of the region’s vehicular language Lozi. Most Shanjo speak Lozi as their first language and the Shanjo language displays considerable interference from Lozi, mainly in the lexicon. Apart from some data in Fortune (1963), no published documentation is available for Shanjo. Most Fwe speakers live in the eastern Caprivi strip in neighbouring Namibia. Their number was estimated at 7,400 in 1998 (Gordon 2005). In Zambia, there were an estimated 1,649 speakers in 1960 (Fortune 1963). Zambian Fwe speakers mainly live in the Imusho area in the south-western part of the Western Province, but there also scattered communities more to the north. Linguistic competence in Fwe seems to be less threatened in Zambia, as compared to Shanjo, possibly due to its strong ethnic identity in the Caprivi (Seidel 2005; Elderkin 1998). The only hitherto published documentation on Fwe is on the Caprivi variant (Baumbach 1997). In Guthrie’s (1971) referential classification of the Bantu languages, Shanjo was classified in the Luyana group as K36.
    [Show full text]
  • Josephine Ntelamo Sitwala Master of Arts
    LANGUAGE MAINTENANCE IN THE MALOZI COMMUNITY OF CAPRIVI Josephine Ntelamo Sitwala Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the subject SOCIOLINGUISTICS at the University of South Africa Supervisor: Prof L.A. Barnes February 2010 ii Table of Contents Acknowledgements .............................................................................................................. vi Abstract ............................................................................................................................... viii Chapter 1: Introduction 1 ................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Introduction: Statement of the problem ...................................................................... 1 1.2 Aim of the study .......................................................................................................... 1 1.3 The research questions ................................................................................................ 2 1.4 The hypothesis of the study ......................................................................................... 2 1.5 Significance of the study ............................................................................................. 3 1.6 Motivation for the study .............................................................................................. 3 1.7 The Malozi and their language .................................................................................... 4
    [Show full text]