Patterns of Macromycete Community Assemblage Along an Elevation Gradient: Options for Fungal Gradient and Metacommunity Analyses
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Hans Halbwachs
Hans Halbwachs hat are fungal characteristics Moreover, the variability of spore traits in winter. It has been speculated that good for? Well, for identifying is bewildering (as was discussed by Else this may be a strategy to avoid predators fungi, of course! Field Vellinga in the previous issue of FUNGI). (Halbwachs et al., 2016), though this Wmycologists all over the world are living Size, ornamentation, and pigmentation would imply investment, e.g., into encyclopedias when it comes to fungal occur in all combinations (Fig. 2). These antifreeze substances and producing traits. Even the most subtle differences are the visible characteristics which may relatively small fruit bodies, as in in spore size or cap coloration have their be grouped in (1) morphological (shape, Flammulina velutipes or Hygrophorus place in identifying mushrooms and size) and (2) physiological (pigments, hypothejus. Generally, species fruiting other fungi. Quite many mycologists are taste, smell, toxicity, etc.). A third, more in late autumn seem to have larger intrigued by the endless variations, for mysterious trait, is the phenology of fruit fruit bodies, at least in Cortinarius instance of fruit bodies (Fig. 1). bodies. Some do it in spring, some even (Halbwachs, 2018). Figure 1. Examples of basidiomycete fruit body shapes and colors. From left to right top: Amanita flavoconia (courtesy J. Veitch), Lactarius indigo (courtesy A. Rockefeller), Butyriboletus frostii (courtesy D. Molter); bottom: Calostoma cinnabarinum (courtesy D. Molter), Tricholomopsis decora (courtesy W. Sturgeon), Mycena adonis (courtesy D. Molter). creativecommons. org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/deed.en. 18 FUNGI Volume 12:1 Spring 2019 Knockin’ on Evolution’s Door Although some ideas are circulating about the functionality of fungal traits, mycologists want to know more about their ecological implications. -
Four Newly Recorded Amanita Taxa from India
BIODIVERSITAS ISSN: 1412-033X Volume 17, Number 1, April 2016 E-ISSN: 2085-4722 Pages: 342-348 DOI: 10.13057/biodiv/d170146 Four newly recorded Amanita taxa from India YADWINDER SINGH♥, MUNRUCHI KAUR Department of Botany, Punjabi University, University College of Engineering Rd, Urban Estate Phase II, Patiala-147002, Punjab, India. Tel.::+91 175 304 6265, email: [email protected] Manuscript received: 9 March 2015. Revision accepted: 16 April 2016. Abstract. Singh Y, Kaur M. 2016. Four newly recorded Amanita taxa from India. Biodiversitas 17: 342-348. During the fungal forays in district Himachal Pradesh of North Western India, four unrecorded taxa of Amanita were collected. They are Amanita flavoconia var. flavoconia, A. flavoconia var. inquinata, A. pilosella f. pilosella and A. porphyria. A. flavoconia var. flavoconia is distinctive in having a brilliant yellow to yellow orange cap, with white lamellae and a stipe base turning light brownish on injury. Whereas. A. flavoconia var. inquinata possesses brownish orange to yellowish orange to orange yellow, subvicid pileus, having white to pastel yellow stipe, annulus grayish yellow, superior and volva forming broken rings of yellow patches around the bulb. A. pilosella f. pilosella unique in possessing grayish brown or brownish beige pileus having thick irregular warts and white lamellae edges. A. porphyria is represented by nonstriate pileus margin, off white stipe, decorated with grayish squamules, with violaceous tinge and has a marginate bulb, annulus is persistent, off white above and light grey below and volva is friable, as grey, cottony mass at the margin of the bulb. Keywords: Amanitaceae, new record, India, taxonomy INTRODUCTION microscope (Olympus) on 100x and 40x by cutting free hand sections of revived part of the dried specimen and The genus Amanita belongs to the family Amanitaceae staining them in 1% cotton blue or 2% congo red. -
Species Diversity of the Genus Amanita Dill. Ex Boehm. (1760) in Chu Yang Sin National Park, Daklak, Vietnam
Available online www.jsaer.com Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research, 2018, 5(4):53-63 ISSN: 2394-2630 Research Article CODEN(USA): JSERBR Species Diversity of the Genus Amanita Dill. Ex Boehm. (1760) in Chu Yang Sin National Park, Daklak, Vietnam T.T.T. Hien1, L.B. Dung2, N.P.D. Nguyen3, T.D. Khanh4* 1Middle School Teachers Nursery Daklak, Buon Ma Thuat, Vietnam 2Dalat Univesity, Vietnam, 3Tay Nguyen University, Vietnam; 4Agricultural Genetics Insitute, Hanoi, Vietnam Abstract The genus Amanita is one of the genera which is diverse in shapes, colors, species and biological characteristics. The species are valuable in medicine and nutritious for human health. However, there are some species belonging to this genus are toxic, especially the species belonging to Amanita Dill. Ex Boehm. The investigation of the species was carried out in Chu Yang Sin national park. The results showed that 15 species of Amanita Dill. Ex Boehm were recorded: (1) Amanita abrupta; (2) Amanita amanitoides; (3) Amanita caesareoides; (4) Amanita caesarea; (5) Amanita cokeri ; (6) Amanita concentrica; (7) Amanita flavoconia; (8) Amanita levistriata; (9) Amanita multisquamosa; (10) Amanita pantherina; (11) Amanita phalloides; (12) Amanita pilosella, (13) Amanita solitaria; (14) Amanita subcokeri; (15) Amanit vaginata .Within 15 species were identified, eight species were newly added to the list of predominant fungi in the Central Highlands of Vietnam included: Amanita abrupta, Amanita amanitoides, Amanita concentrica, Amanita flavoconia, Amanita levistriata, Amanita multisquamosa, Amanita pilosella, Amanita solitaria. Most of the collected Amanita species showed bright colors with a base or fungal rings. They live in areas with high moisture (>85%), at altitude from 800 – 1200 m above sea level, annually occur from June to November and are saprotrophic on soil, under tree shades, especially coniferous, semi-evergreen trees and on greensward or shrubs. -
How to Distinguish Amanita Smithiana from Matsutake and Catathelasma Species
VOLUME 57: 1 JANUARY-FEBRUARY 2017 www.namyco.org How to Distinguish Amanita smithiana from Matsutake and Catathelasma species By Michael W. Beug: Chair, NAMA Toxicology Committee A recent rash of mushroom poisonings involving liver failure in Oregon prompted Michael Beug to issue the following photos and information on distinguishing the differences between the toxic Amanita smithiana and edible Matsutake and Catathelasma. Distinguishing the choice edible Amanita smithiana Amanita smithiana Matsutake (Tricholoma magnivelare) from the highly poisonous Amanita smithiana is best done by laying the stipe (stem) of the mushroom in the palm of your hand and then squeezing down on the stipe with your thumb, applying as much pressure as you can. Amanita smithiana is very firm but if you squeeze hard, the stipe will shatter. Matsutake The stipe of the Matsutake is much denser and will not shatter (unless it is riddled with insect larvae and is no longer in good edible condition). There are other important differences. The flesh of Matsutake peels or shreds like string cheese. Also, the stipe of the Matsutake is widest near the gills Matsutake and tapers gradually to a point while the stipe of Amanita smithiana tends to be bulbous and is usually widest right at ground level. The partial veil and ring of a Matsutake is membranous while the partial veil and ring of Amanita smithiana is powdery and readily flocculates into small pieces (often disappearing entirely). For most people the difference in odor is very distinctive. Most collections of Amanita smithiana have a bleach-like odor while Matsutake has a distinctive smell of old gym socks and cinnamon redhots (however, not all people can distinguish the odors). -
What's in a Name?
What’s in a Name? Expand your Vocabulary by Looking at the World around You 1. Mushrooms When walking through a field or forest, have you ever wondered what the names are for the flowers, trees, or animals that you see? We tend to remember the things we see around us when we identify them by name; we forget what we see when we can’t put a name to it. This happens especially with birds, insects, and flowers: you see an unusual specimen and want to recall it later, but you forget it quickly because you can’t name it. This happened to me last summer. During a mid-summer outing, I came across several interesting mushrooms, and determined to find out their names, so that I could identify them and recognize them the next time. Fortunately I had a camera with me, and so I was able to capture pictures that would help me in finding the names of the mushrooms. The result not only expanded my knowledge of the natural world, it also reinforced my grasp of Greek and Latin vocabulary. A little reading revealed that names are given to mushrooms for various and good reasons. Here’s a sampling of what I learned. Amanita flavoconia – Yellow Patches Appearing in this photo in the so-called button stage, the Amanita flavoconia is a very common but pretty mushroom. Notice that the mushroom is identified by two words: the first points to the general ranking (genus) of mushrooms that share several features; the second word identifies the species with a more peculiar feature. -
Morphological and Molecular Characterization of Selected Macrofungi in Northern Areas of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan
MORPHOLOGICAL AND MOLECULAR CHARACTERIZATION OF SELECTED MACROFUNGI IN NORTHERN AREAS OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA, PAKISTAN PhD (Botany) Junaid Khan CENTER FOR PLANT SCIENCES AND BIODIVERSITY UNIVERSITY OF SWAT 2018 MORPHOLOGICAL AND MOLECULAR CHARACTERIZATION OF SELECTED MACROFUNGI IN NORTHERN AREAS OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA, PAKISTAN PhD (Botany) Submitted by Junaid Khan Roll No. 120851 Supervised by Dr. Hassan Sher Co supervisor Dr. Abdul Nasir Khalid CENTER FOR PLANT SCIENCES AND BIODIVERSITY UNIVERSITY OF SWAT 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS CONTENTS Page Number Acknowledgements i Abstract ii Chapter 1. Introduction 1 Aims and Objectives 08 2. Materials and Methods 10 Study area 10 Field visits and collection of fruiting bodies 12 Morphological and anatomical characterization 13 Specimen identification and deposition 14 Molecular characterization 14 DNA extraction 14 PCR amplification, Visualization and sequencing 15 Editing of Sequences and BLAST Analysis of ITS sequences 16 3. Results 18 4. Discussion 382 5. Conclusions and Recommendations 419 6. References 421 7. Annexure-A 451 LIST OF FIGURES No. TITLE Page No. 1. Map of the study area……………………………………………………... 11 2. Macroscopic and microscopic characters of Chlorophyllum hortense…… 22 3. Molecular Phylogenetic analysis by of Chlorophyllum hortense and associated taxa inferred from nITS data by using Maximum Likelihood method……………………………………………………………………… 23 4. Macroscopic and microscopic characters of Echinoderma asperum………. 26 5. Macroscopic and microscopic structures of Lepiota cristata………………. 29 6. Molecular Phylogenetic analysis of Lepiota cristata and associated taxa by 30 Maximum Likelihood method inferred from nITS data using MEGA6…….. 7. Basidiomata of Leucoagaricus campestris………………………………… 34 8. Microscopic structures of Leucoagaricus campestris……………………… 35 9. Molecular Phylogenetic analysis of Leucoagaricus campestris and associated 36 taxa by Maximum Likelihood method using MEGA6 software……………. -
Mycologia Newsletter of the Mycological Society of America -- In
Supplement to Mycologia Vol. 53(4) August 2002 Newsletter of the Mycological Society of America -- In This Issue -- Fungal Protein For Human Use by Karl Leo Braun and Gustavo Viniegra Fungal Protein for Human Use ............... 1-2 Questions or comments should be sent to Karl Leo Braun at 5460 Ballentine MSA Official Business .......................... 2-15 Pike, Springfield, OH 45502 or email: <[email protected]>. From the President .................................. 2 MSA Council Email Express ................. 2-3 As a follow up to his article entitled “An Interview With Dr. William Important Announcements ............... 3-4 Dudley Gray” [Inoculum 53(3):1-5] concerning the production of Annual Reports of: fungal protein, Karl Leo Braun contacted Dr. Gaston Guzman in Officers .............................................. 5-6 Xalapa, Mexico. In turn, Dr. Guzman suggested that he get in touch with Dr. Gustavo Viniegra. Mr. Braun did contact Dr. Viniegra and Publications ....................................... 6-8 received the following reply. Standing Committees ......................... 8-9 Rotating Committees ..................... 10-11 Dear Mr. Braun: Affiliates and Assignments ........... 11-13 The idea to use mycelial cultures as fungal protein was considered Ad Hoc Committees ...................... 13-14 in many countries, including Mexico, but to my knowledge, only the Representatives ............................. 14-15 Rank Hovis and McDougall company started food protein from From the Editor ..................................... 15 sugars at UK. I remember, Dr. Solomon’s announcing in 1980 at the Forms International Biotechnology Symposium the approval of UK of Change of Address ............................. 25 mycelial protein for human uses. The brand name is Quorn and you Endowment & Contributions ............. 28 may check the details in the following address <http://sst.tees.ac.uk/ Gift Membership .............................. -
2020 Oklahoma Native Plant Record
58 Oklahoma Native Plant Record Volume 20, December 2020 SOME COMMON AMANITA SPECIES OF OKLAHOMA Clark L. Ovrebo Department of Biology University of Central Oklahoma Edmond, OK 73034 [email protected] Jay Justice 16055 Michelle Drive Alexander, AR 72002 ABSTRACT Brief descriptions and photos are presented for twenty species of the mushroom genus Amanita that are common to Oklahoma. The descriptions and illustrations introduce mushroom morphology and terminology for Amanitas that are important for their identification. Short diagnoses are also presented for each of the seven sections of Amanita. The species are arranged according to their placement in each section. One species, A. persicina, has not yet been reported for Oklahoma but we include it with the speculation that it is present in the pine forests of eastern Oklahoma. Key words: Agaricomycetes, Amanitaceae, mushrooms, biodiversity INTRODUCTION present. The geographical “hot spot” that has the greatest diversity of Amanitas in Amanita is a charismatic genus because North America, and perhaps the entire of its reputation for having some of the world, is the Southeastern/Gulf Coast deadliest poisonous species, because of the regions of the United States. We cannot lore associated with several species, and estimate for sure how many species occur in because of their artistic beauty. Amanitas Oklahoma but it could be as many as one rank among the most photographed or hundred. painted of all wild mushrooms. Illustrations In this article, we report on and illustrate of Amanitas are frequently featured on tea some of the frequently encountered towels, coffee cups and many other kitchen Amanitas in Oklahoma. -
Publication 26. Biological Series 5 the AGARICACEAE of MICHIGAN
MICHIGAN GEOLOGICAL AND BIOLOGICAL SURVEY prunulus Fr. .............................................16 orcella Fr..................................................17 Publication 26. Biological Series 5 novaboracensis Pk. ................................. 17 THE AGARICACEAE OF MICHIGAN caespitosus Pk. ....................................... 17 BY Leptonia Fr. ....................................................18 C. H. KAUFFMAN Key to the species.......................................18 VOL. I Leptonia placida Fr.........................................18 lampropoda Fr. ........................................19 TEXT rosea Longyear........................................19 PUBLISHED AS A PART OF THE ANNUAL REPORT OF THE seticeps Atk. ............................................19 BOARD OF GEOLOGICAL AND BIOLOGICAL SURVEY FOR formosa Fr. ..............................................20 1918. serrulata Fr. .............................................20 euchroa Fr. ..............................................20 LANSING, MICHIGAN WYNKOOP HALLENBECK CRAWFORD CO., STATE PRINTERS asprella Fr................................................20 1918 Nolanea Fr......................................................21 Key to the species.......................................21 Nolanea dysthales (Pk.) Atk...........................21 Contents pascua Fr.................................................22 versatilis Fr. .............................................22 Pluteus Fr. ........................................................3 babingtonii Berk.......................................22 -
Amanita Subgenus Amanita
GSMNP ATBI Amanita subgenus Amanita Amanita Pers. Amanita section Amanita (Amanitaceae) Amanita section Vaginatae Amanita subgenus Lepidella Key to Sections Section List Amanita section Lepidella Bibliography Amanita section Amidella Back to Top Amanita section Phalloideae Amanita section Validae Amanita of GSMNP - 1 Key to Sections of the Genus Amanita GSMNP T.b.w. ATBI Amanita Pers. (Amanitaceae) Key to Sections Section List Bibliography Back to Top Amanita of GSMNP - 2 Taxa of Amanita section Amanita in Park GSMNP ATBI Amanita agglutinata (B. & C. in B.) Lloyd (t.b.w.) Amanita farinosa Schw. Amanita frostiana (Peck) Sacc. Amanita Amanita gemmata sensu Jenkins (t.b.w.) section Amanita monticulosa (B. & C.) Sacc. (t.b.w.) Amanita Amanita multisquamosa Peck Amanita muscaria (L.:Fr.) Pers. var. persicina Jenkins (t.b.w.) Key to Amanita (section) Amanita parcivolvata (Peck) E. J. Gilb. List of Amanita (section) Key to Sections Amanita pubescens sensu Coker (t.b.w.) Section List Amanita roseitincta (Murr.) Murr. Bibliography Amanita velatipes Atk. Back to Top Amanita wellsii (Murr.) Sacc. (t.b.w.) Amanita sp. S1 sect. Amanita - 1 Key to Amanita section Amanita in the Park GSMNP T.b.w. ATBI Amanita section Amanita Key to Amanita (section) List of Amanita (section) Key to Sections Section List Bibliography Back to Top sect. Amanita - 2 Amanita farinosa Schw. GSMNP BRIEF DESCRIPTION: T.b.w. ATBI Amanita section Amanita Key to Amanita (section) List of Amanita (section) Key to Sections Section List Bibliography Back to Top A. farinosa - 1 Amanita frostiana (Peck) Sacc. GSMNP BRIEF DESCRIPTION: T.b.w. ATBI Amanita section Amanita Key to Amanita (section) List of Amanita (section) Key to Sections Section List Bibliography Back to Top A. -
2020 Oklahoma Native Plant Record
ISSN 1536-7738 Oklahoma Native Plant Record Journal of the Oklahoma Native Plant Society Volume 20, December 2020 1 Oklahoma Native Plant Record Journal of the Oklahoma Native Plant Society P. O. Box 14274 Tulsa, Oklahoma 74159-1274 Volume 20, December 2020 ISSN 1536-7738 http://ojs.library.okstate.edu/osu/ Editor: Gloria Caddell Production Editor: Sandy Graue Electronic Production Editor: Sandy Graue Manuscript Editor: Chad King Technical Advisor: Erica Corbett The purpose of ONPS is to encourage the study, protection, propagation, appreciation, and use of the native plants of Oklahoma. Membership in ONPS is open to any person who supports the aims of the Society. ONPS offers individual, student, family, and life memberships. Officers and Board Members President: Bill Farris Committee Chairs: Vice-President: Donna Horton Historian: Fran Stallings Secretary: Connie Murray Publicity/Merchandise: Barbara Klein Treasurer: Mary Korthase Betty Kemm Award: Sue Amstutz Past President: Bruce Smith Awards: Constance Murray Directors at Large: Membership Database: Sandy Graue Kathy Doss Membership Database Ed.: Tina Julich Jim Elder Mailings/Printings: Sandy Graue Ray Luth Gaillardia Editor: Lynn Michael Joe Roberts Color Oklahoma: Alicia Nelson Janet Thomas Webmaster: Adam Ryburn Rahmona Thompson Web Editors: Joe Roberts, Sandy Graue Chapter Chairs: http://www.oknativeplants.org Central: Patrick Bell Cross Timbers: Elaine Lynch Northeast: Teresa Blue Mycology: Nancy Hamill Articles (c) The Authors Journal compilation (c) Oklahoma Native Plant Society Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-ShareAlike4.0 International License, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc-sa/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly attributed, not used for commercial purposes, and, if transformed, the resulting work is redistributed under the same or similar license to this one. -
Museum Bulletin 179
if ( (i. urcr C ^ 4Cik^ < <SL --t fT < r '' 9 f r r 2 F^vv^ < t '/'- ^ c <_ «^ <^ rc i< ^f C^ ^ 4C «w c C ^ r V t. C ( f C C f ( r 1^^^ * ( ''SL < < ' " r * '^ '. ^S ^c*: ^L ^ i r" c r ^c «^ ( C ' r c ^ ^ ^5 ^ ^ ?* « <^ If 1 ^flr <- f ( '^c <Hr r J • *3ik- - im «« ^i^ s ( «e<!^ ' •-^ 'S ^iL. ^ c / r r^M ^ c r c C 40^ r^ «L C 1 <^ «s. « c <^ c c c: ^ ••ar \l ^ ' ' ^ ' -^*^ '^ I ; < f^ v^ • ^ «. %. ^cI fi ~ ^^ ^ ( M '( itf m (^ i^ r ^L L ^ * r 41 ft. «1^ >- « 4 / 42- 'r V * ' <' e ( 4C * 4 ^ < 4 r < « 4 ^ * M 5: I ^ I- -. ?^ * i^- 4 C '' ' C (^ ^ 44L' < ^ < <' 1 f € «' ^ C < 4 C 4 ^ ! 1 41 V 4 c r 1. r r < f ^ ^ ' c 1 ( ^ 41 1 ^ c ^f- «< C < 1 « < c C < L. ^ c r ."^ c c ^ r a^ 41 ^ 4S 4 43f. ( V <^ « r « ^ ^ C 4L fi ^ Ci c « •^ ^« <- « ^. ^9>- «. HH %^ r •^ % c '^ ^ I ^ r f r < ^ . 4r J a i 1 •^^ * 41 ^ < r r a ^ ^^ 4^ U ^ « '^^ c 4f < « L C 4S^ 5 41 ^ 4 I ( l( C € c 4C <* * '' €i € ^L ^ i ^ * « «[ S^ ^ ^^^^^^^r^^^^^^^^^BB ( ^^ 2^ « ^ «^^^/1^9 < ( 5^ ^^ ^KT m1^ ( c c ^ 4L m^ i ^tec <^ .^^^M^ . ^ « ^ »w %, c <i» ^ V ^ 3^ I c L < < -r ^ ^ < C C « i: c * < ^ (.41 <.C C € 1 'Vv.- f (A. \ t 4 < t « 4 r «_ ^ t *: *4^ MB c < t '4. t ^ ^ \ i ' *4^ ^ ^ < 'c < Si •ar < « ''°' L c if; 4^" ^ ^^.^ ^ < <ir « ^ cr ^ ^M *4.