A303 Stonehenge Amesbury to Berwick Down Technical Appraisal Report Volume 1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A303 Stonehenge Amesbury to Berwick Down Technical Appraisal Report Volume 1 A303 Stonehenge Amesbury to Berwick Down Technical Appraisal Report Volume 1 Public Consultation 2017 A303 Amesbury to Berwick Down | HE551506 Table of contents Chapter Pages Executive summary 1 Purpose of report 1 Problems and opportunities 1 Scheme objectives 2 Options identification 2 Initial Corridor appraisal – Design Fix A 2 Development of route options within corridors – Design Fix B 5 Initial route options appraisal – Design Fix C 6 Further route options appraisal 9 Appraisal summary 14 Programme 14 Overall Summary 15 1 Introduction 16 1.1 Purpose of this report 16 1.2 Scheme context 16 1.3 Scheme history 18 1.4 Technical reports 27 1.5 Structure of the report 27 2 Planning brief 30 2.1 Introduction 30 2.2 Client Scheme Requirements 30 2.3 Expansion on headline requirements 30 3 Existing conditions 32 3.1 Engineering conditions 32 3.2 Environmental status 49 3.3 Environmental conditions 50 3.4 Social conditions 56 3.5 Distributional conditions 58 3.6 Maintenance and repair strategy statement 59 3.7 Other relevant factors 62 4 Planning context 64 4.1 Introduction 64 4.2 UK Legislation and European Directives 64 4.3 National policy 66 4.4 Other relevant policy and strategy 68 4.5 Local policy 70 5 Initial corridors appraisal 72 5.1 Introduction 72 5.2 Initial corridors identification and appraisal 72 A303 Amesbury to Berwick Down | HE551506 6 Development of route options within corridors 104 6.1 Introduction 104 6.2 Basis of geometric design 104 7 Initial route options appraisal 118 7.1 Introduction 118 7.2 Route option proposals for assessment 118 7.3 Appraisal methodology 118 7.4 Corridor D route options assessment 124 7.5 Corridor F route options assessment 133 7.6 Conclusions 144 8 Description of route options for further appraisal 145 8.1 Introduction 145 8.2 Route descriptions 145 8.3 Road layout 149 8.4 Highway design relaxations and departures from standards 150 8.5 Junction and side roads strategy 150 8.6 Carriageway lighting 153 8.7 Impact on existing utilities 153 8.8 Proposed structures 154 8.9 Public Rights of Way (PRoW) 155 8.10 Tunnel design with Route Options D061 and D062 155 8.11 Earthworks 157 8.12 Surface water drainage 158 8.13 Buildability 159 9 Client Scheme Requirements and policy assessment 162 9.1 Introduction 162 9.2 Assessment methodology 162 9.3 Assessment 163 9.4 Summary and conclusions 167 10 Traffic analysis and modelling 170 10.1 Introduction 170 10.2 Initial corridors appraisal (Design Fix A) traffic modelling 170 10.3 Initial route options appraisal (Design Fix C) traffic modelling 175 10.4 Further WebTAG appraisal traffic modelling 180 10.5 Road layout and standards 186 10.6 Conclusions 191 11 Economic assessment 194 11.1 Introduction 194 11.2 Overview 194 11.3 Presentation of results 196 11.4 Approach 196 11.5 Results – Typically monetised impacts (initial BCR) 208 11.6 Results – Other transport and economic impacts (adjusted BCR) 209 HE551506-AA-GEN-SWI-RP-CX-000020 |P13, S0| 21/12/2016 A303 Amesbury to Berwick Down | HE551506 11.7 Results – Other Monetised Impacts 209 11.8 Results – supplementary approach to wider economic benefits 210 11.9 Sensitivity Tests 210 11.10 Programmatic Appraisal 211 11.11 Economic assessment conclusions 212 12 Social assessment 215 12.1 Introduction 215 12.2 Assessment methodologies 215 12.3 Assessment 220 12.4 Conclusions 224 13 Distributional impact assessment 226 13.1 Introduction 226 13.2 Assessment methodology 227 13.3 Assessment 228 14 Safety assessment 234 14.1 Introduction 234 14.2 Impact on road user 234 14.3 Impact during construction, maintenance, operation and demolition (CDM) 241 15 Operational assessment 243 15.1 Introduction 243 15.2 Schemes operating regime 243 15.3 Driver compliance 245 15.4 Conclusion 245 16 Technology assessment 246 16.1 Introduction 246 16.2 Option design implications of ITS systems 246 16.3 Regional Control Centre systems and sub systems 247 16.4 Conclusion 248 17 Maintenance assessment 249 17.1 Introduction 249 17.2 Maintenance and repair strategy for civils 249 17.3 Maintenance and repair strategy for technology 250 17.4 Conclusion 250 18 Environmental assessment 252 18.1 Introduction 252 19 Stakeholder engagement 268 20 Appraisal summary 277 20.1 Introduction 277 20.2 Appraisal Summary Tables (ASTs) 281 21 Programme 284 21.1 Introduction 284 21.2 Key milestones 284 HE551506-AA-GEN-SWI-RP-CX-000020 |P13, S0| 21/12/2016 A303 Amesbury to Berwick Down | HE551506 22 Overall Summary 285 GLOSSARY 288 GLOSSARY DESCRIPTIONS 292 Appendix A Existing conditions 303 A.1 Existing features 304 A.2 Existing public utilities 305 A.3 Existing geology mapping 306 A.4 Existing traffic, journey time and accident data 307 A.5 Environmental constraints 308 Appendix B Initial corridors appraisal (Design Fix A) 309 B.1 Historical routes 310 B.2 Corridors identified 311 B.3 Environmental assessment methodology and scoring assessment 312 B.4 Client Scheme Requirements 313 B.5 Environmental NPSNN assessment 314 B.6 EAST assessment 315 B.7 Better performing corridors 316 Appendix C Development of route options within preferred corridors (Design Fix B) 317 C.1 Corridor D with historic routes 318 C.2 Corridor D rationalised route options 319 C.3 Corridor D route options for initial appraisal 320 C.4 Corridor F with historic routes 321 C.5 Corridor F rationalised route options 322 C.6 Corridor F historic route rationalisation table 323 C.7 Corridor F refined route options 327 C.8 Corridor F route options for initial appraisal 328 Appendix D Initial route option assessment (Design Fix C) 329 D.1 Initial route option assessment (Design Fix C) 330 Appendix E Route options for further appraisal 331 E.1 Route options for further appraisal (D001, D003 and F010) 332 E.2 Intermediate route options (D031, D032 and F010) 333 E.3 Amended route options for further appraisal (D061, D062 and F010) 334 Appendix F Description of route options for further appraisal 335 F.1 Route Option D061 proposed layout 336 F.2 Route Option D062 proposed layout 337 F.3 Route Option F010 proposed layout 338 Appendix G Client Scheme Requirements and policy assessment 339 G.1 Client Scheme Requirements and policy assessment 340 Appendix H Assessment summary 341 H.1 Appraisal summary tables 342 HE551506-AA-GEN-SWI-RP-CX-000020 |P13, S0| 21/12/2016 A303 Amesbury to Berwick Down | HE551506 Table of Figures Figure 1 Options identification process ...................................................................... 2 Figure 2 Better performing corridor options (Design Fix A) ........................................ 5 Figure 3 Corridor D route options for initial appraisal ................................................. 7 Figure 4 Corridor F route options for initial appraisal ................................................. 9 Figure 5 Route options for further appraisal ..............................................................10 Figure 1-1 A303/A30 trunk route and Amesbury to Berwick Down scheme ...........16 Figure 1-2 Schemes to deliver an Expressway to the South West ........................18 Figure 1-3 Examples of alternative routes considered ...........................................20 Figure 1-4 Scheme published in 2003 for A303 Stonehenge Improvement ..............23 Figure 1-5 Plan showing location of relocated Stonehenge Visitor Centre ............25 Figure 1-6 Highways England's Project Control Framework structure ......................27 Figure 3-1 A303 Amesbury to Berwick Down scheme assessment area ...............32 Figure 3-2 Proximity of Stonehenge to the A303 ...................................................33 Figure 3-3 Climate graph – Boscombe Down ............................................................35 Figure 3-4 Distribution of traffic on the A303 at Stonehenge .....................................43 Figure 3-5 A303 – Westbound daily traffic by day and month ...................................44 Figure 3-6 A303 – Eastbound daily traffic by day and month ....................................44 Figure 3-7 A303 through traffic (between Hampshire border and Winterbourne Stoke) ..................................................................................................................................46 Figure 3-8 Accident section locations ........................................................................48 Figure 3-9 Accident sections between Amesbury to Berwick Down ..........................49 Figure 5-1 Options identification process ..................................................................72 Figure 5-2 Corridor A - Surface routes more than 1km north of A303 (outside WHS) ..................................................................................................................................75 Figure 5-3 Corridor B - Surface routes more than 1km north of A303 (at least partially within WHS) ..............................................................................................................76 Figure 5-4 Corridor C - Surface routes within 1.0 km of the existing A303 (at least partially within WHS) .................................................................................................77 Figure 5-5 Corridor D - Partially tunnelled route options within 1.0km (on plan) of the existing A303 (partially within WHS)..........................................................................78 Figure 5-6 Corridor E - Surface routes and more than 1km south of A303 (at least partially within WHS) .................................................................................................79 Figure
Recommended publications
  • From: Melksham Rail User Group To: “Melksham Bypass Consultation” Date: 16Th January 2021
    From: Melksham Rail User Group To: “Melksham Bypass Consultation” Date: 16th January 2021 Dear Sirs, Input to current "A350 Melksham Bypass" consultation from the Melksham Rail User Group Thank you for the early opportunity to provide input into the "A350 Melksham Bypass" consultation process. This input is written on behalf of the Melksham Rail User Group and was unanimously adopted at the group meeting on Wednesday 13th January 2021. 1. Please consider the Melksham Rail User Group and the TransWilts Community Rail Partnerships as stakeholders and consultees throughout this process 2. We commend options 4 and 5 (rail and bus) public transport and option 6 (cycle and walking) improvements, and note that they score very highly on deliverability, affordability and acceptability. Whilst they are unlikely to meet your objectives on their own, they should provide a valuable and significant element implemented as thoroughly as practical in any solution 3. Please look at alternative of long distance traffic routing via the already Highways England / Trunk A46/A36 route rather than by increasing capacity on the regional A350 (you have confirmed you can add other options at this stage). 4. Please take a look at the alternative of rail use for longer distance freight and medium and longer passenger traffic via the TransWilts railway line which parallels the A350 road. 5. Please ensure that any railway crossings (options 9a, 9b, 9c, 8a and 8b) allow for the line to be restored to a double track such that trains can path both ways under or over the bridge at the same time. Please rule out level crossings at each point that rail and road cross.
    [Show full text]
  • WILTSHIRE Extracted from the Database of the Milestone Society
    Entries in red - require a photograph WILTSHIRE Extracted from the database of the Milestone Society National ID Grid Reference Road No. Parish Location Position WI_AMAV00 SU 15217 41389 UC road AMESBURY Church Street; opp. No. 41 built into & flush with churchyard wall Stonehenge Road; 15m W offield entrance 70m E jcn WI_AMAV01 SU 13865 41907 UC road AMESBURY A303 by the road WI_AMHE02 SU 12300 42270 A344 AMESBURY Stonehenge Down, due N of monument on the Verge Winterbourne Stoke Down; 60m W of edge Fargo WI_AMHE03 SU 10749 42754 A344 WINTERBOURNE STOKE Plantation on the Verge WI_AMHE05 SU 07967 43180 A344 SHREWTON Rollestone top of hill on narrow Verge WI_AMHE06 SU 06807 43883 A360 SHREWTON Maddington Street, Shrewton by Blind House against wall on Verge WI_AMHE09 SU 02119 43409 B390 CHITTERNE Chitterne Down opp. tank crossing next to tree on Verge WI_AMHE12 ST 97754 43369 B390 CODFORD Codford Down; 100m W of farm track on the Verge WI_AMHE13 ST 96143 43128 B390 UPTON LOVELL Ansty Hill top of hill,100m E of line of trees on Verge WI_AMHE14 ST 94519 42782 B390 KNOOK Knook Camp; 350m E of entrance W Farm Barns on bend on embankment WI_AMWH02 SU 12272 41969 A303 AMESBURY Stonehenge Down, due S of monument on the Verge WI_AMWH03 SU 10685 41600 A303 WILSFORD CUM LAKE Wilsford Down; 750m E of roundabout 40m W of lay-by on the Verge in front of ditch WI_AMWH05 SU 07482 41028 A303 WINTERBOURNE STOKE Winterbourne Stoke; 70m W jcn B3083 on deep verge WI_AMWH11 ST 990 364 A303 STOCKTON roadside by the road WI_AMWH12 ST 975 356 A303 STOCKTON 400m E of parish boundary with Chilmark by the road WI_AMWH18 ST 8759 3382 A303 EAST KNOYLE 500m E of Willoughby Hedge by the road WI_BADZ08 ST 84885 64890 UC road ATWORTH Cock Road Plantation, Atworth; 225m W farm buildings on the Verge WI_BADZ09 ST 86354 64587 UC road ATWORTH New House Farm; 25m W farmhouse on the Verge Registered Charity No 1105688 1 Entries in red - require a photograph WILTSHIRE Extracted from the database of the Milestone Society National ID Grid Reference Road No.
    [Show full text]
  • West Ashton Neighbourhood Development Plan 2018-2026
    WEST ASHTON NEIGHBOURHOOD DEVELOPMENT PLAN 2018-2026 Referendum Version Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................... 3 2. Portrait of West Ashton ............................................................ 7 3. Vision and Objectives ............................................................. 14 4. NDP Policies ........................................................................... 17 5. Informal Aspirations ................................................................ 33 6. Monitoring and Review ........................................................... 34 Appendix 1: Evidence Base Appendix 2: The Neighbourhood Area and Parish of West Ashton Appendix 3: West Ashton and Ashton Park Appendix 4: West Ashton: Landscape and Biodiversity Appendix 5: West Ashton and Heritage Appendix 6: West Ashton and Flood Risk Appendix 7: West Ashton and Sustainable Transport Appendix 8: West Ashton Researchers 2 1. Introduction The West Ashton Neighbourhood Development Plan (NDP) covers the whole of the Parish of West Ashton which is a rural community located adjacent to the county town of Trowbridge. 1.1. West Ashton Parish Council resolved to prepare a Neighbourhood Development Plan (NDP) on 21st July 2015. Neighbourhood planning was introduced by the Localism Act 2011 and gives communities the power to develop a shared vision for their area. Neighbourhood plans can shape, direct and help to deliver sustainable development, by influencing local planning decisions by Wiltshire Council
    [Show full text]
  • A303 PI Inspector's Report
    Report to the First Secretary of The Planning State and the Secretary of State for Inspectorate 4/09 Kite Wing Transport Temple Quay House 2 The Square Temple Quay By Michael Ellison MA (Oxon) Bristol BS1 6PN 0117 372 6372 An Inspector appointed by the First Secretary Date: 31 January of State and the Secretary of State for 2005 Transport Assisted by Clive Cochrane Dip Arch, Reg Arch, MSc, MRTPI HIGHWAYS ACT 1980 ACQUISITION OF LAND ACT 1981 ROAD TRAFFIC REGULATION ACT 1984 THE A303 TRUNK ROAD (STONEHENGE IMPROVEMENT) ORDER 200 THE A303 TRUNK ROAD (STONEHENGE IMPROVEMENT) SLIP ROADS ORDER 200 THE A303 TRUNK ROAD (STONEHENGE IMPROVEMENT) (DETRUNKING) ORDER 200 THE A303 TRUNK ROAD (STONEHENGE IMPROVEMENT) SIDE ROADS ORDER 200 THE A303 TRUNK ROAD (STONEHENGE IMPROVEMENT) COMPULSORY PURCHASE ORDER (NO. ) 200 THE A303 TRUNK ROAD STONEHENGE IMPROVEMENT (COUNTESS ROUNDABOUT TO LONGBARROW CROSSROADS) (PROHIBITION OF CERTAIN CLASSES OF TRAFFIC AND PEDESTRIANS) ORDER 200 AND THE A303 TRUNK ROAD STONEHENGE IMPROVEMENT (STONEHENGE BYWAY) (PROHIBITION OF MOTOR VEHICLES) ORDER 200 Dates of Inquiry: 17 February 2004 to 11 May 2004 Ref: HA61/4/3 REPORT TO THE FIRST SECRETARY OF STATE AND THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR TRANSPORT FILE REF: HA61/4/3 CONTENTS Section Subject Page Number Case Details 1 1 Introduction 3 2 Description of the site and its surroundings 7 3 Procedural Submission 12 4 The case of the Highways Agency 14 Background and history of the scheme 14 The need for the scheme 17 Traffic forecasts 20 The scheme proposals 21 Design standards 26
    [Show full text]
  • THE UFO REPORT App Endix Some Major UFO Organizations 223 the Crop Circles 224 Some UFO Journals 225 Bibliography 226 Services 228 Index 231 Editor's Foreword
    Subject: Unexplained Lights Later in the night a red sun/ike light was seen through the trees. It moved about and pulsed. At one point it appeared to throw offglowing particles and then broke into five separate white objects and then disappeared. Immediately thereafter, three starlike objects were noticed in the sky, two objects to the north and one to the south, all of which were about 1 oo offthe horizon. The objects moved rapidly in sharp angular movements and displayed red, green and blue lights. The objects to the north appeared to be elliptical through an 8-12 power lens. Then they turned to full circles. The objects to the north remained in the sky for an hour or more. The object to the south was visible for two or three hours and beamed down a stream of light from time to time. Numerous individuals, including the undersigned, witnessed the activities. -from an oHicial memorandum wriHen by Charles I. Halt, Lt. Col., USAF to the British Ministry of Defense January 13, 1981 Other UFO Reports from Avon Books COMMUNION by Wh itley Strieber THE GULF BREEZE SIGHTINGS: THE MosT AsTOUNDING MuLTIPLE UFO SIGHTINGs IN U.S. HISTORY by Ed Wa lters and Frances Wa lters PHENOMENON: FORTY YEARS OF FLYING SAUCERS edited by John Sp encer and Hilary Evans REPORT ON COMMUNION by Ed Conroy TRANSFORMATION by Wh itley Strieber UFO CRASH AT ROSWELL by Ke vin D. Randle and Donald R. Schmitt Avon Books are available at special quantity discounts for bulk purchases for sales promotions, premiums, fund raising or edu­ cational use.
    [Show full text]
  • Salisbury Plain SAC Conservation Objectives Supplementary Advice
    European Site Conservation Objectives: Supplementary Advice on Conserving and Restoring Site Features Salisbury Plain Special Area of Conservation (SAC) Site code: UK0012683 Date of Publication: 20 February 2017 Page 1 of 30 About this document This document provides Natural England’s supplementary advice about the European Site Conservation Objectives relating to Salisbury Plain SAC. This advice should therefore be read together with the SAC Conservation Objectives which are available here. You should use the Conservation Objectives, this Supplementary Advice and any case-specific advice given by Natural England, when developing, proposing or assessing an activity, plan or project that may affect this site. This Supplementary Advice to the Conservation Objectives presents attributes which are ecological characteristics of the designated species and habitats within a site. The listed attributes are considered to be those that best describe the site’s ecological integrity and which, if safeguarded, will enable achievement of the Conservation Objectives. Each attribute has a target which is either quantified or qualitative depending on the available evidence. The target identifies as far as possible the desired state to be achieved for the attribute. The tables provided below bring together the findings of the best available scientific evidence relating to the site’s qualifying features, which may be updated or supplemented in further publications from Natural England and other sources. The local evidence used in preparing this supplementary advice has been cited. The references to the national evidence used are available on request. Where evidence and references have not been indicated, Natural England has applied ecological knowledge and expert judgement.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Joint World Heritage Centre / ICOMOS Advisory Mission to Stonehenge, Avebury and Associated Sites
    World Heritage 41 COM Patrimoine mondial Paris, 27 June / 27 juin 2017 Original: English UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION ORGANISATION DES NATIONS UNIES POUR L'EDUCATION, LA SCIENCE ET LA CULTURE CONVENTION CONCERNING THE PROTECTION OF THE WORLD CULTURAL AND NATURAL HERITAGE CONVENTION CONCERNANT LA PROTECTION DU PATRIMOINE MONDIAL, CULTUREL ET NATUREL WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE / COMITE DU PATRIMOINE MONDIAL Forty-first session / Quarante-et-unième session Krakow, Poland / Cracovie, Pologne 2-12 July 2017 / 2-12 juillet 2017 Item 7 of the Provisional Agenda: State of conservation of properties inscribed on the World Heritage List and/or on the List of World Heritage in Danger Point 7 de l’Ordre du jour provisoire: Etat de conservation de biens inscrits sur la Liste du patrimoine mondial et/ou sur la Liste du patrimoine mondial en péril MISSION REPORT / RAPPORT DE MISSION Stonehenge, Avebury and Associated Sites (United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland) (373bis) Stonehenge, Avebury et sites associés (Royaume-Uni de Grande-Bretagne et d'Irlande du Nord) (373bis) 31 January – 3 February 2017 Report on the joint World Heritage Centre / ICOMOS Advisory Mission to Stonehenge, Avebury and Associated sites 31 January – 3 February 2017 Table of contents Executive Summary 1. Introductory Statements 1.1 Acknowledgments 1.2. Aims and mandate of the February 2017 Mission 2. Context and background 2.1 Statement of Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) 2.2 Summary 1st Mission recommendations (October 2015 – report April 2016). 2.3 Reactions by the civil society 2.4 Governance and consensus building among heritage bodies 3. Responses by the SP to the recommendations of the first Mission - April 2016 3.1 Willingness to respond 3.2 Issues of archaeological organisation and quality control 3.3 Issue of visitor numbers and behaviour 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Joint World Heritage Centre / Icomos Advisory Mission to Stonehenge, Avebury and Associated Sites 27-30 October 20
    REPORT ON THE JOINT WORLD HERITAGE CENTRE / ICOMOS ADVISORY MISSION TO STONEHENGE, AVEBURY AND ASSOCIATED SITES Stonehenge October 2015 copyright UNESCO 27-30 OCTOBER 2015 Chris Barker, Civil Engineer, ICOMOS Nathan Schlanger, Archaeologist, ICOMOS Marie-Noël Tournoux, Project Officer Europe and North America Unit, World Heritage Centre Stonehenge October 2015 copyright UNESCO 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ……………………………………………………………….…… 4 1 INTRODUCTION ………………………………………………………………………..… 5 2 MISSION REPORT ……………………………………………………………………….. 7 3 MISSION CONCLUSIONS ………………………………………………………………. 24 4 MISSION RECOMMENDATIONS ………………………………………………...…...... 24 5 REFERENCES……………………………………………………………………………... 28 6 ANNEXES…………....……………………………………………………………………... 29 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The joint World Heritage Centre and ICOMOS mission thanks the State Party for the arrangements for the Advisory Mission and the preparation of all the necessary relevant materials, together with the good will in its advancement. Particular thanks are due to DCMS and Historic England and more specifically to Keith Nichol and Hannah Jones from DCMS and Henry Owen-John and Phil McMahon from Historic England, our main focal points. The mission would like to acknowledge and to commend the investment and professionalism of our hosts in addition to logistics and hospitality. The assistance gladly provided by Historic England, English Heritage Trust, the National Trust, and their representatives, be it at organizational level or on the ground, including notably Chris Smith, Historic England, and Heather Sebire, Properties Curator West English Heritage Trust, Kate Davies, Stonehenge General Manager, English Heritage Trust, Beth Thomas & Sarah Simmonds, World Heritage site Coordinator, Nicola Snashall, National Trust WHS archaeologist for Stonehenge & Avebury, Cassandra Genn, Senior project and Stakeholder Manager, Ian Wilson, Assistant Director of Operations, Ingrid Samuel, Historic Environment Director, Janet Tomlin, National Trust, as well as the Wiltshire Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Stonehenge A303 Improvement: Outline Assessment of the Impacts
    Stonehenge A303 improvement: outline assessment of the impacts on the Outstanding Universal Value of the World Heritage property of potential route options presented by Highways England for January 2017 Nicola Snashall BA MA PhD MCIfA National Trust Christopher Young BA MA DPhil FSA Christopher Young Heritage Consultancy January 2017 ©Historic England and the National Trust Stonehenge A303 improvements: outline assessment of the impacts on the Outstanding Universal Value of the World Heritage property of potential route options presented by Highways England for January 2017 Executive Summary Introduction In 2014, English Heritage (now Historic England) and the National Trust commissioned an assessment (Snashall, Young 2014) on the potential impact of new road options, including a tunnel, for the A303 within the Stonehenge component of the Stonehenge, Avebury and Associated Sites World Heritage property. Since at that time, there were no detailed proposals, that report considered four possible alternatives and concluded that, of these, an off-line route with a tunnel of 2.9kms length would be the most deliverable solution. The government remains committed to improving the A303 and to funding sufficient for a tunnel of at least 2.9kms length within the World Heritage property. Highways England are consulting in early 2017 on route options developed since 2014 for this road scheme through the World Heritage property and bypassing Winterbourne Stoke village to the west. This report is an outline assessment of these initial options on the Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) of the World Heritage property. It has been commissioned to assess the impact of the latest road options in the light of updated archaeological information.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Name Construction Start Actual Construction End
    Construction Construction Construction Project Name Start Actual End Planned End Actual M5 J11a-12 MP 86/9 Geotech 10/01/2013 19/04/2013 21/03/2013 M5 J20-21 VRS MP 155/5 - 159/0 10/01/2013 17/01/2014 17/01/2014 M5 J31 Exminster Drainage 02/09/2011 30/10/2011 30/10/2011 A38 Lee Mill to Voss Farm FS C 01/10/2009 01/04/2011 01/04/2011 A30 SCORRIER-AVERS W/B & E/B C 02/02/2012 01/07/2012 01/03/2012 A30 PLUSHA KENNARDS HSE E/B C 18/09/2012 24/09/2012 25/09/2012 A38 WHISTLEY HILL DRAINAGE C 07/11/2011 24/12/2011 23/12/2011 A47 Guyhirn Bank C NP 19/09/2012 28/09/2012 29/09/2012 A120 Coggeshall Bypass East C 13/11/2012 16/11/2012 16/11/2012 A14 Orwell to Levington C 04/11/2013 11/11/2013 11/11/2013 A14SpittalsI/CResurfacingC NP 02/07/2012 07/08/2013 26/07/2012 A38 Clinnick R/W & White C 11/03/2012 06/07/2012 06/07/2012 A30 Whiddon Down to Woodleigh 01/12/2011 14/02/2012 14/02/2012 A49 KIMBOLTON RETAINING-CapRd 11/02/2013 10/04/2013 30/04/2013 NO3:A404 A308toA4130 SB Appl C 16/07/2012 18/07/2012 21/07/2012 NO3 M4 J6-7 EB Cippenham C 24/09/2012 11/08/2012 16/11/2012 A36 Southington Farm Geotech C 05/09/2011 24/06/2011 21/10/2011 A303 BOSCOMBE DOWN RS C 01/01/2011 30/06/2011 30/06/2011 M5 J18 Avonmouth slip lighti C 01/02/2012 31/03/2012 31/03/2012 A303 South Pethrton St Light C 01/05/2011 30/09/2011 30/09/2011 A303Cartgate RAB St Lighting C 01/01/2012 29/02/2012 29/02/2012 A4 Portway Signals C 01/02/2011 30/09/2011 30/09/2011 M4/M5 Alm.
    [Show full text]
  • Developing Collaborative and Innovative Approaches to the Delivery of Rural Services a Report for Defra's Rural Community Policy
    Developing Collaborative and Innovative Approaches to the Delivery of Rural Services A Report for Defra's Rural Community Policy Unit By Rob Hindle and Ivan Annibal September 2011 Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................. 4 Introduction ........................................................... 7 Consultant Team............................................................. 10 Acknowledgements .......................................................... 10 Methodology Health Warning............................................... 10 How Rurality Affects Service Delivery............................11 Emerging Challenges to Rural Service Delivery .................14 Library Services .............................................................. 15 Primary Schools .............................................................. 17 Rural Bus Services ........................................................... 20 Highway Maintenance ....................................................... 24 Collaborative Local Solutions ......................................26 Library Services .............................................................. 26 Primary Schools .............................................................. 28 Rural Bus Services ........................................................... 30 Using ICT to Support Local Solutions...................................... 32 Enabling the Transition .............................................34 Enabling Local Solutions ...................................................
    [Show full text]
  • South Wiltshire Transport Assessment 2008
    Delivering Strategies Salisbury Core Strategy Transport Assessment Report for Salisbury District Council March 2008 Document Control Project Title: Salisbury Core Strategy Transport Assessment MVA Project Number: C3691500 Document Type: Final Report Directory & File Name: J:\C36915 Salisbury Core Strategy TA\Salisbury Core Strategy TA Final Report.Doc Document Approval Primary Author: Katie Hall Other Author(s): Nick Richardson Antony Onipko Reviewer(s): Steve Williamson Formatted by: KH/SW/MD Distribution Issue Date Distribution Comments 1 26/01/2008 Vincent Albano, Natasha Draft report issued for comment Styles 2 01/04/2008 Vincent Albano, Natasha Final Report issued Styles Contents 1 Introduction 1.1 1.1 Scope of the Study 1.1 1.2 Context 1.1 1.3 Methodology 1.2 1.4 Structure of the Report 1.4 2 Baseline 2.1 2.1 Development Needs 2.1 2.2 Policy Context 2.1 2.3 Travel Patterns in Salisbury District 2.5 2.4 Community Transport 2.6 2.5 Demand Responsive Transport (DRT) 2.7 2.6 Trip Attractors 2.8 3 Larger Settlements Review 3.1 3.1 Introduction 3.1 3.2 Accessibility 3.1 3.3 Journey to Work Data 3.2 3.4 Highway Capacity 3.5 3.5 Public Transport Capacity 3.7 3.6 Opportunities for Walking and Cycling 3.9 3.7 Summary 3.10 4 Smaller Settlements Review 4.1 4.1 Introduction 4.1 4.2 Accessibility 4.1 4.3 Facilities 4.2 4.4 Journey to Work Data 4.3 4.5 Highway Capacity 4.5 4.6 Public Transport Capacity 4.5 4.7 Opportunities for Walking and Cycling 4.7 4.8 Summary 4.7 5 Strategy Development 5.1 5.1 Settlement Ranking 5.1 5.2 Larger Settlements
    [Show full text]