Byzantine Visual Culture in Western Imperial Courts, 497-1002

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Byzantine Visual Culture in Western Imperial Courts, 497-1002 COMPETITION OR ADMIRATION? BYZANTINE VISUAL CULTURE IN WESTERN IMPERIAL COURTS, 497-1002. by Stacey Adelia Blake A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY School of Arts and Law Institute of Archaeology and Antiquity University of Birmingham March, 2015. University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. ABSTRACT The following dissertation reassess previous explanations for the transmission of Byzantine iconography to western material culture that have been classified by the classical canon as being manifestations of a ‘barbarian’ ruler attempting to legitimize their fledgling culture. The tumultuous relationship between the east and the west during the Late Antique period to the middle Byzantine period and the subsequent visual culture that demonstrates cross- cultural exchange comprises the majority of my analysis. I approach the topic in a case study fashion focusing on five rulers: Theodoric, Charlemagne, and the three Ottos. The source material chosen for this dissertation varies as it has been selected based on claims by previous scholarship of demonstrating some level of Byzantine influence. My re-examination of these works includes the application of an interdisciplinary theoretical framework first postulated by Robert Hayden: Competitive Sharing. This theory suggests that material culture displaying syncretism was not a reflection of admiration, but of competition. An implication of this study is that art was an active participant in the relationship between the east and the west, serving as a communicative device, rather than as the more frequently cited passive role of a conduit for iconographical transmission or cultural legitimization. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS There are many people who have helped me complete this project. I would first, and foremost like the thank my parents who spent countless hours after school working with me to ensure that I did not lag behind the rest of the class who seemed to have the magical ability to stay seated and focused in their chairs. I would like to thank Drs. Art and Jane Blouin for their extreme generosity. Without their additional support this would not have been possible. The University of Birmingham has been an excellent resource over the past three years in terms of both supervision and financial support. Professor Leslie Brubaker has been an invaluable asset for my progression, and I would like to thank her for her support and feedback. The scholarships and bursaries awarded to me through the university were not only generous, but allowed me the freedom to travel to conferences internationally. The continued support from my alma mater, Carleton University, is still present to this day. Professor John Osborne continues to be a resource that has remained consistent throughout my academic career. I would also like to thank Dr. Caroline Goodson of University of London. Her valuable insights and expertise on the Carolingians were integral to the completion of my second chapter. Lastly, I would like to thank Arthur Blouin. The completion of this project would not have been possible without his unwavering support. His ability to be sounding board, critic and champion has meant more to me than words can express. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ......................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 1: Theodoric the Great ....................................................................... 21 Historical background ....................................................................................... 27 Theodoric’s Building Programme ..................................................................... 38 Sant’ Apollinare Nuovo ..................................................................................... 44 Arian Baptistery ................................................................................................ 65 Theodoric’s Mausoleum ................................................................................... 70 Competitive Sharing ......................................................................................... 81 Civilitas ideology ................................................................................ 84 Theodoric’s Building Programme and Competitive sharing ............... 95 Conclusions .................................................................................................... 103 Chapter 2: Charlemagne ................................................................................ 107 Historical Background .................................................................................... 110 Early Interactions with Byzantium .................................................... 112 Coronation ........................................................................................ 122 Charlemagne’s Cultural Programme .............................................................. 135 Manuscripts .................................................................................................... 142 Ivories ............................................................................................................. 179 Competitive Sharing ....................................................................................... 202 Conclusions .................................................................................................... 217 Chapter 3: The Three Ottos ............................................................................ 220 Liudprand of Cremona ...................................................................... 222 Historical background ..................................................................................... 228 Theophano in the West .................................................................................. 236 Theophano’s Impact on the Visual Arts ......................................................... 249 Art Commissioned by Ecclesiastical Leaders ................................................ 269 Imperial Artistic Commissions ........................................................................ 285 Competitive Sharing ....................................................................................... 299 Conclusions .................................................................................................... 306 Conclusion .................................................................................................... 310 Images ........................................................................................................... 316 Bibliography ................................................................................................. 387 LIST OF IMAGES Figure 1: Theophano and Otto II crowned by Christ, ivory, Paris, Musée de Cluny.…………………..……………………………………….……..316 Figure 2: Arian Baptistery, Ravenna ………………………………………………………….………………317 Figure 3: Sant’ Apollinare Nuovo, Ravenna ………………………………………………………….………………318 Figure 4: Theodoric’s Mausoleum, Ravenna ………………………………………………………….………………319 Figure 5: Palatium mosaic, Sant’ Apollinare Nuovo, Ravenna ……………………………………………………………………….…320 Figure 6: Multiplication of the Loaves, mosaic, Sant’ Apollinare Nuovo, Ravenna………….……………………………………………………321 Figure 7: Christ Carrying the Cross, mosaic, Sant’ Apollinare Nuovo, Ravenna…………….…………………………………………………322 Figure 8: Prophet, mosaic, Sant’ Apollinare Nuovo, Ravenna ………………………………………………………………………….323 Figure 9: Christ on a Lyre-backed Throne, mosaic, Sant’ Apollinare Nuovo, Ravenna……………………..………………………………....……..324 Figure 10: Madonna and Child Enthroned, mosaic, Sant’ Apollinare Nuovo, Ravenna…………………………………………….…………………325 Figure 11: The Three Magi, mosaic, Sant’ Apollinare Nuovo, Ravenna ………………………………………………………………………….326 Figure 12: Classe mosaic, Sant’ Apollinare Nuovo, Ravenna ……………………………………………………………….…………327 Figure 13: Christ Treading on the Beasts, Archiepiscopal Chapel, Ravenna ………………………………………………………....…………..…..328 Figure 14: Processional mosaic, Sant’ Apollinare Nuovo, Ravenna ………………………………………………………………......……..329 Figure 15: Detail: Palatium mosaic, Sant’ Apollinare Nuovo, Ravenna …………………………………………………………………….……330 Figure 16: Detail: Reverse of Palatium mosaic, Sant’ Apollinare Nuovo, Ravenna……………………………………………………......……..331 Figure 17: An Emperor Enthroned Before Christ, mosaic, Hagia Sophia, Istanbul…………………...……………………………………………332 Figure 18: Solidus, Basil I and Constantine, Whittemore Collection, Washington, D.C………………………………………………....…..333 Figure 19: Solidus, Leo VI and Constantine VII, Whittemore Collection, Washington, D.C……………………………………………..………334 Figure 20: Portrait of Justinian, mosaic, Sant’ Apollinare Nuovo, Ravenna …………………………………………………………..……………..335 Figure 21: Baptism of Christ, mosaic, Arian Baptistery, Ravenna ………………………………………………………………......……..336 Figure 22: Detail: Baptism of Christ, mosaic, Arian Baptistery, Ravenna ………………………………………………………………………….337 Figure 23: Gold medallion, Deutsche Archäologische Institut, Berlin
Recommended publications
  • Journeys to Byzantium? Roman Senators Between Rome and Constantinople
    Journeys to Byzantium? Roman Senators Between Rome and Constantinople Master’s Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Michael Anthony Carrozzo, B.A Graduate Program in History The Ohio State University 2010 Thesis Committee: Kristina Sessa, Advisor Timothy Gregory Anthony Kaldellis Copyright by Michael Anthony Carrozzo 2010 Abstract For over a thousand years, the members of the Roman senatorial aristocracy played a pivotal role in the political and social life of the Roman state. Despite being eclipsed by the power of the emperors in the first century BC, the men who made up this order continued to act as the keepers of Roman civilization for the next four hundred years, maintaining their traditions even beyond the disappearance of an emperor in the West. Despite their longevity, the members of the senatorial aristocracy faced an existential crisis following the Ostrogothic conquest of the Italian peninsula, when the forces of the Byzantine emperor Justinian I invaded their homeland to contest its ownership. Considering the role they played in the later Roman Empire, the disappearance of the Roman senatorial aristocracy following this conflict is a seminal event in the history of Italy and Western Europe, as well as Late Antiquity. Two explanations have been offered to explain the subsequent disappearance of the Roman senatorial aristocracy. The first involves a series of migrations, beginning before the Gothic War, from Italy to Constantinople, in which members of this body abandoned their homes and settled in the eastern capital.
    [Show full text]
  • BYZANTINE CAMEOS and the AESTHETICS of the ICON By
    BYZANTINE CAMEOS AND THE AESTHETICS OF THE ICON by James A. Magruder, III A dissertation submitted to Johns Hopkins University in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Baltimore, Maryland March 2014 © 2014 James A. Magruder, III All rights reserved Abstract Byzantine icons have attracted artists and art historians to what they saw as the flat style of large painted panels. They tend to understand this flatness as a repudiation of the Classical priority to represent Nature and an affirmation of otherworldly spirituality. However, many extant sacred portraits from the Byzantine period were executed in relief in precious materials, such as gemstones, ivory or gold. Byzantine writers describe contemporary icons as lifelike, sometimes even coming to life with divine power. The question is what Byzantine Christians hoped to represent by crafting small icons in precious materials, specifically cameos. The dissertation catalogs and analyzes Byzantine cameos from the end of Iconoclasm (843) until the fall of Constantinople (1453). They have not received comprehensive treatment before, but since they represent saints in iconic poses, they provide a good corpus of icons comparable to icons in other media. Their durability and the difficulty of reworking them also makes them a particularly faithful record of Byzantine priorities regarding the icon as a genre. In addition, the dissertation surveys theological texts that comment on or illustrate stone to understand what role the materiality of Byzantine cameos played in choosing stone relief for icons. Finally, it examines Byzantine epigrams written about or for icons to define the terms that shaped icon production.
    [Show full text]
  • Revisions for 2016 Catalog
    Revisions for 2016 Catalog 1. October 3, 2016 – Trim – Page 56: Added 270CR – Replacement Rubber Tip 2. October 3, 2016 – Trim – Page 42: Door Protection Plates – changed 220S diamond tread to (diamond tread available on in US26 only) 3. October 3, 2016 – Trim – Page 25: added (compatible with 1-3/4” doors only) to 27N Fasteners 4. October 3, 2016 – Trim – Page 83: Changed 334V image 5. October 3, 2016 – Trim – Page 83: Changed 334V Fasteners bullets to read: • Two (2) #8 finish washers; • Two (2) 7-32 x 1-7/8” OHMS for 1-5/8” doors; • Two (2) 7-32 x 2” OHMS for 1-3/4” doors. 6. October 3, 2016 – Trim – Page 83: Added 334V Engraving: Available up to four characters. 7. October 3, 2016 – Trim – Page 83: Added 322V Engraving: Available up to four characters. 8. October 3, 2016 – Electrified Solutions: Added touchless actuators 2-659-03707 and 2-659- 3708 to page 76 9. October 3, 2016 – Electrified Solutions: Added touchless actuators 2-659-03707 and 2-659- 3708 images to page 53 10. October 4, 2016- General Information: Changed address under Montgomery DC from 200 County Court Lane, Montgomery, AL 36105 to 200 County Court, Montgomery, AL 36105 11. October 4, 2016 – Locks: changed last sentence on page 1 in the introductory paragraph 12. October 5, 2016 – T&W: removed all brass finishes (MIB) from product line and removed verbiage, “brass thresholds are supplied with brass screws.” Pages included: 2, 3 (General Information), 6, 8, 9, 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, 18, 26, 29, 35 and 38 13.
    [Show full text]
  • GPSMAP® 400/500 Series Owner’S Manual © 2009 Garmin Ltd
    GPSMAP® 400/500 series owner’s manual © 2009 Garmin Ltd. or its subsidiaries Garmin International, Inc. Garmin (Europe) Ltd. Garmin Corporation 1200 East 151st Street, Liberty House No. 68, Jangshu 2nd Road, Olathe, Kansas 66062, USA Hounsdown Business Park, Shijr, Taipei County, Taiwan Tel. (913) 397.8200 or (800) 800.1020 Southampton, Hampshire, SO40 9LR UK Tel. 886/2.2642.9199 Fax (913) 397.8282 Tel. +44 (0) 870.8501241 (outside the UK) Fax 886/2.2642.9099 0808 2380000 (within the UK) Fax +44 (0) 870.8501251 All rights reserved. Except as expressly provided herein, no part of this manual may be reproduced, copied, transmitted, disseminated, downloaded or stored in any storage medium, for any purpose without the express prior written consent of Garmin. Garmin hereby grants permission to download a single copy of this manual onto a hard drive or other electronic storage medium to be viewed and to print one copy of this manual or of any revision hereto, provided that such electronic or printed copy of this manual must contain the complete text of this copyright notice and provided further that any unauthorized commercial distribution of this manual or any revision hereto is strictly prohibited. Information in this document is subject to change without notice. Garmin reserves the right to change or improve its products and to make changes in the content without obligation to notify any person or organization of such changes or improvements. Visit the Garmin Web site (www.garmin.com) for current updates and supplemental information concerning the use and operation of this and other Garmin products.
    [Show full text]
  • The Costume of Byzantine Emperors and Empresses ’
    Shaw, C. (2011) ‘The Costume of Byzantine Emperors and Empresses ’ Rosetta 9.5: 55-59. http://www.rosetta.bham.ac.uk/colloquium2011/shaw_costume.pdf http://www.rosetta.bham.ac.uk/colloquium2011/shaw_costume.pdf The Costume of the Byzantine Emperors and Empresses Carol Shaw PhD candidate, 4th year (part-time) University of Birmingham, College of Arts and Law [email protected] The Costume of the Byzantine Emperors and Empresses The first Roman emperors were all members of the senate and continued to belong to it throughout their reigns.1 All the members of the senate including the emperor wore tunics and togas decorated with a wide purple band, the latus clavus, and special footwear.2 During the period of instability in the early third century several emperors were selected by the army.3 Initially this shift in power did not affect court ceremony and dress; but slowly both began to change. Court ceremony became more formal and emperors distanced themselves even from senators.4 During the late third century, Diocletian introduced the new court ceremony of the adoration of the purple; according to Aurelius Victor, the emperor also wore richly brocaded purple robes, silks and jeweled sandals.5 Diocletian’s abdication ceremony illustrates that court ceremony and dress often remained very simple. The only garment closely associated with imperial power at this time was the emperor’s purple robes. In his On the Deaths of the Persecutors, Lactantius records that in AD 305 when Diocletian abdicated, the ceremony consisted of the emperor standing under a statue of his patron deity, 1 Under the law the Lex Ovinia (enacted by 318 BC), censors selected each senator according to certain criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • Bvm6612m(S)-Hc-Bf-Dg
    144 Cell Mono 440-450W Advancing the Power of the Sun BVM6612M(S)-HC-BF-DG 0~+5W Power Tolerance 20.2% Maximum Efficiency 440-450W Power Output Range High Quality and Reliable Modules ◆Double-sided glass technology, more power generation ◆ Withstand up to 5400 Pa snow load and 2400 Pa wind load ◆ 2 EL inspections per cell/module for defect-free consistency ◆ High salt and ammonia resistance certified ◆ 0~+5 W guaranteed positive tolerance ◆ Rugged design for long-term durability; passed extended reliability tests 41.19 x 84.06 Inches Silver Frame / Double-sided glass Warranty Output Linear Warranty ◆ 12-year product warranty Standard Warranty 1.(12)years product warranty ◆ 30-year linear power output warranty 2.Out linear warranty with 2.5% degradation in the 1st year and less er than 0.5% degradation each year 97.5% from 2nd year to 30th year 95% Addi ti onal Va lue Comprehensive Certificates for Products and Management 85% ◆ UL 61730, IEC 61215, IEC 61730, CEC listed, MCS and CE Output pow ◆ ISO 9001 for Quality Management Systems 1 5 10 12 15 20 30 unit:year ◆ ISO 14001 for Environmental Management Systems ◆ OHSAS 18001 Occupational Health and Safety Systems Listed in Bloomberg New Energy Finance’s tier 1 list as of 1Q 2018 2107 N 1st Street Suite 550 San Jose, CA 95131 BOVIETSOLARUSA.COM ◆ 877.253.2858 ◆ [email protected] Electrical Characteristics STC BVM6612M-440S-H-HC-BF-DG BVM6612M-445S-H-HC-BF-DG BVM6612M-450S-H-HC-BF-DG Maximum Power (Pmax) 440W 445W 450W Maximum Power Current (Imp) 10.92A 10.99A 11.06A Maximum Power Voltage
    [Show full text]
  • Art List by Year
    ART LIST BY YEAR Page Period Year Title Medium Artist Location 36 Mesopotamia Sumerian 2600 Standard of Ur Inlaid Box British Museum 36 Mesopotamia Sumerian 2600 Stele of the Vultures (Victory Stele of Eannatum) Limestone Louvre 38 Mesopotamia Sumerian 2600 Bull Headed Harp Harp British Museum 39 Mesopotamia Sumerian 2600 Banquet Scene cylinder seal Lapis Lazoli British Museum 40 Mesopotamia Akkadian 2254 Victory Stele of Narum-Sin Sandstone Louvre 42 Mesopotamia Akkadian 2100 Gudea Seated Diorite Louvre 43 Mesopotamia Akkadian 2100 Gudea Standing Calcite Louvre 44 Mesopotamia Babylonian 1780 Stele of Hammurabi Basalt Louvre 45 Mesopotamia Assyrian 1350 Statue of Queen Napir-Asu Bronze Louvre 46 Mesopotamia Assyrian 750 Lamassu (man headed winged bull 13') Limestone Louvre 48 Mesopotamia Assyrian 640 Ashurbanipal hunting lions Relief Gypsum British Museum 65 Egypt Old Kingdom 2500 Seated Scribe Limestone Louvre 75 Egypt New Kingdom 1400 Nebamun hunting fowl Fresco British Museum 75 Egypt New Kingdom 1400 Nebamun funery banquet Fresco British Museum 80 Egypt New Kingdom 1300 Last Judgement of Hunefer Papyrus Scroll British Museum 81 Egypt First Millenium 680 Taharqo as a sphinx (2') Granite British Museum 110 Ancient Greece Orientalizing 625 Corinthian Black Figure Amphora Vase British Museum 111 Ancient Greece Orientalizing 625 Lady of Auxerre (Kore from Crete) Limestone Louvre 121 Ancient Greece Archaic 540 Achilles & Ajax Vase Execias Vatican 122 Ancient Greece Archaic 510 Herakles wrestling Antaios Vase Louvre 133 Ancient Greece High
    [Show full text]
  • The Neonian Baptistery in Ravenna 359
    Ritual and ReconstructedMeaning: The Neonian Baptisteryin Ravenna Annabel Jane Wharton The pre-modern work of art, which gained authority through its extension in ritual action, could function as a social integrator. This essay investigates the figural decoration of the Orthodox Baptistery in Ravenna, in an effort to explain certain features of the mosaic program. If the initiation ritual is reenacted and the civic centrality of the rite and its executant, the bishop, is restored, the apparent "icon- ographic mistakes" in the mosaics reveal themselves as signs of the mimetic re- sponsiveness of the icon. By acknowledging their unmediated character, it may be possible to re-empower both pre-modern images and our own interpretative strategy. The Neonian (or "Orthodox") Baptistery in Ravenna is the preciated, despite the sizable secondary literature generated most impressive baptistery to survive from the Early Chris- by the monument. Because the artistic achievement of the tian period (Figs. 1-5).1 It is a construction of the late fourth Neonian Baptistery lies in its eloquent embodiment of a or early fifth century, set to the north of the basilican ca- new participatory functioning of art, a deeper comprehen- thedral of Bishop Ursus (3897-96?) (Fig. 1).2 The whole of sion of the monument is possible only through a more thor- the ecclesiastical complex, including both the five-aisled ba- ough understanding of its liturgical and social context. The silica and the niched, octagonal baptistery, appears to have first section of this essay therefore attempts to reconstruct been modeled after a similar complex built in the late fourth the baptismal liturgy as it may have taken place in the century in Milan.3 Within two or three generations of its Neonian Baptistery.
    [Show full text]
  • Dreamitaly0709:Layout 1
    INSIDE: The Artistic Village of Dozza 3 Private Guides in Ravenna 5 Bicycling Through Ferrara 6 Where to Stay in Bologna 8 Giorgio Benni Giorgio giasco, flickr.com giasco, Basilica di San Vitale MAMbo SPECIAL REPORT: EMILIA-ROMAGNA Bologna: dream of City of Art ith its appetite for art, Bologna’s ® Wcontributions to the good life are more than gustatory. Though known as the “Red City” for its architecture and politics, I found a brilliant palette of museums, galleries, churches and markets, with mouth-watering visuals for every taste. ITALYVolume 8, Issue 6 www.dreamofitaly.com July/August 2009 City Museums For a splash of Ravcnna’s Ravishing Mosaics 14th-century sculp- ture start at the fter 15 centuries, Ravenna’s lumi- across the region of Emilia-Romagna. Fontana del Nettuno A nous mosaics still shine with the With only a day to explore, I’m grate- in Piazza Maggiore. golden brilliance of the empires that ful that local guide Verdiana Conti Gianbologna’s endowed them. These shimmering Baioni promises to weave art and bronze god — Fontana Nettuno sacred images reveal both familiar and history into every step. locals call him “the giant” — shares the unexpected chapters in Italian history water with dolphins, mermaids and while affirming an artistic climate that We meet at San Apollinaire Nuovo on cherubs. Close by, Palazzo Comunale’s thrives today. Via di Roma. A soaring upper floors contain the Collezioni basilica, its narrow side Comunale d’Arte, which includes opu- Ravenna attracted con- aisles open to a broad lent period rooms and works from the querors from the north nave where three tiers 14th through 19th centuries.
    [Show full text]
  • The Last Horizons of Roman Gaul: Communication, Community, and Power at the End of Antiquity
    The Last Horizons of Roman Gaul: Communication, Community, and Power at the End of Antiquity The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Wilkinson, Ryan Hayes. 2015. The Last Horizons of Roman Gaul: Communication, Community, and Power at the End of Antiquity. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Graduate School of Arts & Sciences. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:17467211 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA The Last Horizons of Roman Gaul: Communication, Community, and Power at the End of Antiquity A dissertation presented by Ryan Hayes Wilkinson to The Department of History in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the subject of History Harvard University Cambridge, Massachusetts May 2015 © 2015 Ryan Hayes Wilkinson All rights reserved. Dissertation Advisor: Professor Michael McCormick Ryan Hayes Wilkinson The Last Horizons of Roman Gaul: Communication, Community, and Power at the End of Antiquity Abstract In the fifth and sixth centuries CE, the Roman Empire fragmented, along with its network of political, cultural, and socio-economic connections. How did that network’s collapse reshape the social and mental horizons of communities in one part of the Roman world, now eastern France? Did new political frontiers between barbarian kingdoms redirect those communities’ external connections, and if so, how? To address these questions, this dissertation focuses on the cities of two Gallo-Roman tribal groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Aspects of St Anna's Cult in Byzantium
    ASPECTS OF ST ANNA’S CULT IN BYZANTIUM by EIRINI PANOU A thesis submitted to The University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Centre for Byzantine, Ottoman and Modern Greek Studies Institute of Archaeology and Antiquity College of Arts and Law The University of Birmingham January 2011 Acknowledgments It is said that a PhD is a lonely work. However, this thesis, like any other one, would not have become reality without the contribution of a number of individuals and institutions. First of all of my academical mother, Leslie Brubaker, whose constant support, guidance and encouragement accompanied me through all the years of research. Of the National Scholarship Foundation of Greece ( I.K.Y.) with its financial help for the greatest part of my postgraduate studies. Of my father George, my mother Angeliki and my bother Nick for their psychological and financial support, and of my friends in Greece (Lily Athanatou, Maria Sourlatzi, Kanela Oikonomaki, Maria Lemoni) for being by my side in all my years of absence. Special thanks should also be addressed to Mary Cunningham for her comments on an early draft of this thesis and for providing me with unpublished material of her work. I would like also to express my gratitude to Marka Tomic Djuric who allowed me to use unpublished photographic material from her doctoral thesis. Special thanks should also be addressed to Kanela Oikonomaki whose expertise in Medieval Greek smoothened the translation of a number of texts, my brother Nick Panou for polishing my English, and to my colleagues (Polyvios Konis, Frouke Schrijver and Vera Andriopoulou) and my friends in Birmingham (especially Jane Myhre Trejo and Ola Pawlik) for the wonderful time we have had all these years.
    [Show full text]
  • Aristocratic Society in Abruzzo, C.950-1140
    Aristocratic society in Abruzzo, c.950-1140 Felim McGrath A dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Dublin 2014 Declaration I declare that this thesis has not been submitted as an exercise for a degree at this or any other university and it is entirely my own work. I agree to deposit this thesis in the University’s open access institutional repository or allow the Library to do so on my behalf, subject to Irish Copyright Legislation and Trinity College Library conditions of use and acknowledgement. ____________________________ Felim McGrath iii Summary This thesis is an examination of aristocratic society in the Italian province of Abruzzo from the mid-tenth century to the incorporation of the region into the kingdom of Sicily in 1140. To rectify the historiographical deficit that exists concerning this topic, this thesis analyses the aristocracy of Abruzzo from the tenth to the twelfth centuries. It elucidates the political fragmentation apparent in the region before the Norman invasion, the establishment and administration of the Abruzzese Norman lordships and their network of political connections and the divergent political strategies employed by the local aristocracy in response to the Norman conquest. As the traditional narrative sources for the history of medieval southern Italy provide little information concerning Abruzzo, critical analysis of the idiosyncratic Abruzzese narrative and documentary sources is fundamental to the understanding this subject and this thesis provides a detailed examination of the intent, ideological context and utility of these sources to facilitate this investigation. Chapter 1 of this thesis examines the historical and ideological context of the most important medieval Abruzzese source – the chronicle-cartulary of San Clemente a Casauria.
    [Show full text]