DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:1203.5425V1 [Physics.Atom-Ph] 24 Mar 2012 § ‡ † (People’S China Metrology, Of) of Lic Technolog Institute Canada National Council, and Zhang, Research Z

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:1203.5425V1 [Physics.Atom-Ph] 24 Mar 2012 § ‡ † (People’S China Metrology, Of) of Lic Technolog Institute Canada National Council, and Zhang, Research Z CODATA Recommended Values of the Fundamental Physical Constants: 2010∗ Peter J. Mohr†, Barry N. Taylor‡, and David B. Newell§, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899-8420, USA (Dated: March 27, 2012) This paper gives the 2010 self-consistent set of values of the basic constants and conversion factors of physics and chemistry recommended by the Committee on Data for Science and Technology (CODATA) for international use. The 2010 adjustment takes into account the data considered in the 2006 adjustment as well as the data that became available from 1 January 2007, after the closing date of that adjustment, until 31 December 2010, the closing date of the new adjustment. Further, it describes in detail the adjustment of the values of the constants, including the selection of the final set of input data based on the results of least-squares analyses. The 2010 set replaces the previously recommended 2006 CODATA set and may also be found on the World Wide Web at physics.nist.gov/constants. Contents D. Cyclotron resonance measurement of the electron relative atomic mass 8 I. Introduction 2 A. Background 2 IV. Atomic transition frequencies 8 B. Brief overview of CODATA 2010 adjustment 3 A. Hydrogen and deuterium transition frequencies, the Rydberg constant R∞, and the proton and deuteron 1. Fine-structure constant α 3 charge radii rp,rd 8 2. Planck constant h 3 1. Theory of hydrogen and deuterium energy levels 8 3. Molar gas constant R 4 2. Experiments on hydrogen and deuterium 16 4. Newtonian constant of gravitation G 4 3. Nuclear radii 17 5. Rydberg constant R∞ and proton radius rp 4 B. Antiprotonic helium transition frequencies and C. Outline of the paper 4 Ar(e) 19 1. Theory relevant to antiprotonic helium 19 II. Special quantities and units 4 2. Experiments on antiprotonic helium 20 3. Inferred value of Ar(e) from antiprotonic helium 20 III. Relative atomic masses 5 C. Hyperfine structure and fine structure 20 A. Relative atomic masses of atoms 5 B. Relative atomic masses of ions and nuclei 6 V. Magnetic moment anomalies and g-factors 22 C. Relative atomic masses of the proton, triton, and A. Electron magnetic moment anomaly ae and the helion 7 fine-structure constant α 22 1. Theory of ae 22 2. Measurements of ae 24 3. Values of α inferred from ae 24 ∗This report was prepared by the authors under the auspices of the B. Muon magnetic moment anomaly aµ 24 CODATA Task Group on Fundamental Constants. The members 1. Theory of aµ 24 of the task group are: 2. Measurement of aµ: Brookhaven 25 F. Cabiati, Istituto Nazionale di Ricerca Metrologica, Italy C. Bound electron g-factor in 12C5+ and in 16O7+ J. Fischer, Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, Germany and Ar(e) 26 J. Flowers, National Physical Laboratory, United Kingdom 1. Theory of the bound electron g-factor 26 K. Fujii, National Metrology Institute of Japan, Japan 2. Measurements of g (12C5+) and g (16O7+) 29 S. G. Karshenboim, Pulkovo Observatory, Russian Federation e e arXiv:1203.5425v1 [physics.atom-ph] 24 Mar 2012 P. J. Mohr, National Institute of Standards and Technology, United VI. Magnetic moment ratios and the muon-electron States of America mass ratio 30 D. B. Newell, National Institute of Standards and Technology, United States of America A. Magnetic moment ratios 30 F. Nez, Laboratoire Kastler-Brossel, France 1. Theoretical ratios of atomic bound-particle to K. Pachucki, University of Warsaw, Poland free-particle g-factors 30 T. J. Quinn, Bureau international des poids et mesures 2. Bound helion to free helion magnetic moment ′ B. N. Taylor, National Institute of Standards and Technology, ratio µh/µh 31 United States of America 3. Ratio measurements 31 B. M. Wood, National Research Council, Canada B. Muonium transition frequencies, the muon-proton Z. Zhang, National Institute of Metrology, China (People’s Repub- magnetic moment ratio µµ/µp, and muon-electron lic of) mass ratio mµ/me 32 1. Theory of the muonium ground-state hyperfine †Electronic address: [email protected] splitting 32 ‡Electronic address: [email protected] 2. Measurements of muonium transition frequencies § Electronic address: [email protected] and values of µµ/µp and mµ/me 33 2 VII. Quotient of Planck constant and particle mass Nomenclature 86 h/m(X) and α 34 A. Quotient h/m(133Cs) 34 References 88 B. Quotient h/m(87Rb) 34 C. Other data 35 VIII. Electrical measurements 35 A. Types of electrical quantities 36 B. Electrical data 36 2 1. KJ RK and h: NPL watt balance 37 2 2. KJ RK and h: METAS watt balance 37 3. Inferred value of KJ 38 C. Josephson and quantum Hall effect relations 38 IX. Measurements involving silicon crystals 39 A. Measurements of d220(X) of natural silicon 39 I. INTRODUCTION B. d220 difference measurements of natural silicon crystals 40 A. Background C. Gamma-ray determination of the neutron relative atomic mass Ar(n) 40 D. Historic X-ray units 40 This article reports work carried out under the aus- E. Other data involving natural silicon crystals 41 pices of the Committee on Data for Science and Tech- F. Determination of NA with enriched silicon 41 nology (CODATA) Task Group on Fundamental Con- 1 X. Thermal physical quantities 42 stants. It describes in detail the CODATA 2010 least- A. Acoustic gas thermometry 42 squares adjustment of the values of the constants, for 1. NPL 1979 and NIST 1988 values of R 43 which the closing date for new data was 31 December 2. LNE 2009 and 2011 values of R 43 2010. Equally important, it gives the 2010 self-consistent 3. NPL 2010 value of R 43 set of over 300 CODATA recommended values of the fun- 4. INRIM 2010 value of R 44 B. Boltzmann constant k and quotient k/h 44 damental physical constants based on the 2010 adjust- 1. NIST 2007 value of k 44 ment. The 2010 set, which replaces its immediate pre- 2. NIST 2011 value of k/h 45 decessor resulting from the CODATA 2006 adjustment C. Other data 45 (Mohr et al., 2008), first became available on 2 June 2011 D. Stefan-Boltzmann constant σ 45 at physics.nist.gov/constants, a Web site of the NIST Fundamental Constants Data Center (FCDC). XI. Newtonian constant of gravitation G 46 A. Updated values 46 The World Wide Web has engendered a sea change in 1. National Institute of Standards and Technology expectations regarding the availability of timely informa- and University of Virginia 46 tion. Further, in recent years new data that influence our 2. Los Alamos National Laboratory 47 knowledge of the values of the constants seem to appear B. New values 47 1. Huazhong University of Science and Technology 47 almost continuously. As a consequence, the Task Group 2. JILA 48 decided at the time of the 1998 CODATA adjustment to take advantage of the extensive computerization that XII. Electroweak quantities 49 had been incorporated in that effort to issue a new set of recommended values every 4 years; in the era of the XIII. Analysis of Data 49 A. Comparison of data through inferred values of α, h, Web, the 12-13 years between the first CODATA set of k and Ar(e) 53 1973 (Cohen and Taylor, 1973) and the second CODATA B. Multivariate analysis of data 55 set of 1986 (Cohen and Taylor, 1987), and between this 1. Data related to the Newtonian constant of second set and the third set of 1998 (Mohr and Taylor, gravitation G 59 2000), could no longer be tolerated. Thus, if the 1998 set 2. Data related to all other constants 60 3. Test of the Josephson and quantum Hall effect is counted as the first of the new 4-year cycle, the 2010 relations 62 set is the 4th of that cycle. Throughout this article we refer to the detailed re- XIV. The 2010 CODATA recommended values 64 ports describing the 1998, 2002, and 2006 adjustments A. Calculational details 64 B. Tables of values 65 as CODATA-98, CODATA-02, and CODATA-06, respec- tively (Mohr and Taylor, 2000, 2005; Mohr et al., 2008). XV. Summary and Conclusion 82 To keep the paper to a reasonable length, our data re- A. Comparison of 2010 and 2006 CODATA view focuses on the new results that became available be- recommended values 82 B. Some implications of the 2010 CODATA recommended values and adjustment for metrology and physics 83 C. Suggestions for future work 84 1 CODATA was established in 1966 as an interdisciplinary com- mittee of the International Council of Science. The Task Group XVI. Acknowledgments 85 was founded 3 years later. 3 tween the 31 December 2006 and 31 December 2010 clos- B. Brief overview of CODATA 2010 adjustment ing dates of the 2006 and 2010 adjustments; the reader should consult these past reports for detailed discussions The 2010 set of recommended values is the result of of the older data. These past reports should also be applying the same procedures as in previous adjustments consulted for discussions of motivation, philosophy, the and is based on a least-squares adjustment with, in this treatment of numerical calculations and uncertainties, case, N = 160 items of input data, M = 83 variables etc. A rather complete list of acronyms and symbols called adjusted constants, and ν = N M = 77 degrees may be found in the nomenclature section near the end of freedom. The statistic “chi-squared”− is χ2 = 59.1 with of the paper. probability p(χ2 ν)=0.94 and Birge ratio R =0.88. | B A significant number of new results became avail- To further achieve a reduction in the length of this able for consideration, both experimental and theoreti- report compared to the lengths of its three most recent cal, from 1 January 2007, after the closing date of the predecessors, it has been decided to omit extensive de- 2006 adjustment, to 31 December 2010, the closing date scriptions of new experiments and calculations and to of the current adjustment.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Magnetic Moment of a Spin, Its Equation of Motion, and Precession B1.1.6
    Magnetic Moment of a Spin, Its Equation of UNIT B1.1 Motion, and Precession OVERVIEW The ability to “see” protons using magnetic resonance imaging is predicated on the proton having a mass, a charge, and a nonzero spin. The spin of a particle is analogous to its intrinsic angular momentum. A simple way to explain angular momentum is that when an object rotates (e.g., an ice skater), that action generates an intrinsic angular momentum. If there were no friction in air or of the skates on the ice, the skater would spin forever. This intrinsic angular momentum is, in fact, a vector, not a scalar, and thus spin is also a vector. This intrinsic spin is always present. The direction of a spin vector is usually chosen by the right-hand rule. For example, if the ice skater is spinning from her right to left, then the spin vector is pointing up; the skater is rotating counterclockwise when viewed from the top. A key property determining the motion of a spin in a magnetic field is its magnetic moment. Once this is known, the motion of the magnetic moment and energy of the moment can be calculated. Actually, the spin of a particle with a charge and a mass leads to a magnetic moment. An intuitive way to understand the magnetic moment is to imagine a current loop lying in a plane (see Figure B1.1.1). If the loop has current I and an enclosed area A, then the magnetic moment is simply the product of the current and area (see Equation B1.1.8 in the Technical Discussion), with the direction n^ parallel to the normal direction of the plane.
    [Show full text]
  • 4 Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
    Chapter 4, page 1 4 Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Pieter Zeeman observed in 1896 the splitting of optical spectral lines in the field of an electromagnet. Since then, the splitting of energy levels proportional to an external magnetic field has been called the "Zeeman effect". The "Zeeman resonance effect" causes magnetic resonances which are classified under radio frequency spectroscopy (rf spectroscopy). In these resonances, the transitions between two branches of a single energy level split in an external magnetic field are measured in the megahertz and gigahertz range. In 1944, Jevgeni Konstantinovitch Savoiski discovered electron paramagnetic resonance. Shortly thereafter in 1945, nuclear magnetic resonance was demonstrated almost simultaneously in Boston by Edward Mills Purcell and in Stanford by Felix Bloch. Nuclear magnetic resonance was sometimes called nuclear induction or paramagnetic nuclear resonance. It is generally abbreviated to NMR. So as not to scare prospective patients in medicine, reference to the "nuclear" character of NMR is dropped and the magnetic resonance based imaging systems (scanner) found in hospitals are simply referred to as "magnetic resonance imaging" (MRI). 4.1 The Nuclear Resonance Effect Many atomic nuclei have spin, characterized by the nuclear spin quantum number I. The absolute value of the spin angular momentum is L =+h II(1). (4.01) The component in the direction of an applied field is Lz = Iz h ≡ m h. (4.02) The external field is usually defined along the z-direction. The magnetic quantum number is symbolized by Iz or m and can have 2I +1 values: Iz ≡ m = −I, −I+1, ..., I−1, I.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Redefinition of SI Base Units
    2019 redefinition of SI base units A redefinition of SI base units is scheduled to come into force on 20 May 2019.[1][2] The kilogram, ampere, kelvin, and mole will then be defined by setting exact numerical values for the Planck constant (h), the elementary electric charge (e), the Boltzmann constant (k), and the Avogadro constant (NA), respectively. The metre and candela are already defined by physical constants, subject to correction to their present definitions. The new definitions aim to improve the SI without changing the size of any units, thus ensuring continuity with existing measurements.[3][4] In November 2018, the 26th General Conference on Weights and Measures (CGPM) unanimously approved these changes,[5][6] which the International Committee for Weights and Measures (CIPM) had proposed earlier that year.[7]:23 The previous major change of the metric system was in 1960 when the International System of Units (SI) was formally published. The SI is a coherent system structured around seven base units whose definitions are unconstrained by that of any other unit and another twenty-two named units derived from these base units. The metre was redefined in terms of the wavelength of a spectral line of a The SI system after the 2019 redefinition: krypton-86 radiation,[Note 1] making it derivable from universal natural Dependence of base unit definitions onphysical constants with fixed numerical values and on other phenomena, but the kilogram remained defined in terms of a physical prototype, base units. leaving it the only artefact upon which the SI unit definitions depend. The metric system was originally conceived as a system of measurement that was derivable from unchanging phenomena,[8] but practical limitations necessitated the use of artefacts (the prototype metre and prototype kilogram) when the metric system was first introduced in France in 1799.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:0801.0028V1 [Physics.Atom-Ph] 29 Dec 2007 § ‡ † (People’S China Metrology, Of) of Lic Institute Canada National Council, Zhang, Research Z
    CODATA Recommended Values of the Fundamental Physical Constants: 2006∗ Peter J. Mohr†, Barry N. Taylor‡, and David B. Newell§, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899-8420, USA (Dated: March 29, 2012) This paper gives the 2006 self-consistent set of values of the basic constants and conversion factors of physics and chemistry recommended by the Committee on Data for Science and Technology (CODATA) for international use. Further, it describes in detail the adjustment of the values of the constants, including the selection of the final set of input data based on the results of least-squares analyses. The 2006 adjustment takes into account the data considered in the 2002 adjustment as well as the data that became available between 31 December 2002, the closing date of that adjustment, and 31 December 2006, the closing date of the new adjustment. The new data have led to a significant reduction in the uncertainties of many recommended values. The 2006 set replaces the previously recommended 2002 CODATA set and may also be found on the World Wide Web at physics.nist.gov/constants. Contents 3. Cyclotron resonance measurement of the electron relative atomic mass Ar(e) 8 Glossary 2 4. Atomic transition frequencies 8 1. Introduction 4 1. Hydrogen and deuterium transition frequencies, the 1. Background 4 Rydberg constant R∞, and the proton and deuteron charge radii R , R 8 2. Time variation of the constants 5 p d 1. Theory relevant to the Rydberg constant 9 3. Outline of paper 5 2. Experiments on hydrogen and deuterium 16 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Conventioral Standards?* JESSE W
    156 IRE TRANSACTIONS ON INSTRUMENTATION December Present Status of Precise Information on the Universal Physical Constants. Has the Time Arrived for Their Adoption to Replace Our Present Arbitrary Conventioral Standards?* JESSE W. M. DuMONDt INTRODUCTION this subject that the experimentally measured data r HREE years ago Dr. E. R. Cohen and I prepared often do not give the desired unknowns directly but and published our latest (1955) least-squares ad- instead give functions of the unknowns. justment of all the most reliable data then avail- Seven different functions of these above four un- able bearing on the universal constants of physics and knowns have been measured by experimental methods chemistry. Since then new data and information have which we feel are sufficiently precise and reliable to been accumulating so that a year or two from now the qualify them as input data in a least-squares adjust- time may perhaps be propitious for us to prepare a new ment. These seven experimentally determined numeri- adjustment taking the newly-gained knowledge into cal values are not only functions of the unknowns,ae, account. At present it is too early to attempt such a e, N, and A, but also of the above-mentioned experi re-evaluation since many of the investigations and re- mentally determined auxiliary constants, of which five determinations now under way are still far from com- different kinds are listed in Table I. Another of these pleted. I shall be obliged, therefore, to content myself auxiliary constants I find it expedient to recall to your in this talk with a description of the sources of informa- attention at the very beginning to avoid any possibility tion upon which our 1955 evaluation was based, men- of confusion.
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring the Gyromagnetic Ratio Through Continuous Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Amy Catalano and Yash Aggarwal, Adlab, Boston University, Boston MA 02215
    1 Measuring the gyromagnetic ratio through continuous nuclear magnetic resonance Amy Catalano and Yash Aggarwal, Adlab, Boston University, Boston MA 02215 Abstract—In this experiment we use continuous wave nuclear magnetic resonance to measure the gyromagnetic ratios of Hydro- gen, Fluorine, the H nuclei in Water, and Water with Gadolinium. Our best result for Hydrogen was 25.4 ± 0.19 rad/Tm, compared to the previously reported value of 23 rad/Tm [1]. Our results for the gyromagnetic ratio of water and water with gadolinium contained a greater difference than expected. I. INTRODUCTION Nuclear magnetic resonance has to do with the absorption of radiation by a nucleus in a magnetic field. The energy Fig. 1. Schematic diagram for continuous nmr of a nucleus in a B-field can be written in terms of the gyromagnetic ratio, γ the magnetic field, B, and the frequency, f: III. DATA AND ERROR ANALYSIS ∆E = γB = 2πf (1) For Hydrogen, we plotted 16 points on a graph of frequency The gyromagnetic ratio is a fundamental nuclear constant (Mhz) and magnetic field (Gs). Using the numpy library in and is a different value for every nucleus. Every nucleus Python we calculated a linear best fit line of has a magnetic moment. The principle of nuclear magnetic resonance is to put the nucleus with an intrinsic nuclear spin y = mx + b (2) in a magnetic field and measure at which B-field and frequency where the spin of the nucleus flips. As we vary the magnetic field and the nucleus absorbs the signal from the spectrometer, the Gs m = 217:89 ± 1:95 (3) nucleus will go from a lower energy state to a higher energy MHz state.
    [Show full text]
  • The Discovery of Thermodynamics
    Philosophical Magazine ISSN: 1478-6435 (Print) 1478-6443 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tphm20 The discovery of thermodynamics Peter Weinberger To cite this article: Peter Weinberger (2013) The discovery of thermodynamics, Philosophical Magazine, 93:20, 2576-2612, DOI: 10.1080/14786435.2013.784402 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/14786435.2013.784402 Published online: 09 Apr 2013. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 658 Citing articles: 2 View citing articles Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=tphm20 Philosophical Magazine, 2013 Vol. 93, No. 20, 2576–2612, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14786435.2013.784402 COMMENTARY The discovery of thermodynamics Peter Weinberger∗ Center for Computational Nanoscience, Seilerstätte 10/21, A1010 Vienna, Austria (Received 21 December 2012; final version received 6 March 2013) Based on the idea that a scientific journal is also an “agora” (Greek: market place) for the exchange of ideas and scientific concepts, the history of thermodynamics between 1800 and 1910 as documented in the Philosophical Magazine Archives is uncovered. Famous scientists such as Joule, Thomson (Lord Kelvin), Clau- sius, Maxwell or Boltzmann shared this forum. Not always in the most friendly manner. It is interesting to find out, how difficult it was to describe in a scientific (mathematical) language a phenomenon like “heat”, to see, how long it took to arrive at one of the fundamental principles in physics: entropy. Scientific progress started from the simple rule of Boyle and Mariotte dating from the late eighteenth century and arrived in the twentieth century with the concept of probabilities.
    [Show full text]
  • A Measurement of the Neutron to 199Hg Magnetic Moment Ratio
    A measurement of the neutron to 199Hg magnetic moment ratio S. Afacha,b,c, C. A. Bakerd, G. Bane, G. Bisonb, K. Bodekf, M. Burghoffg, Z. Chowdhurib, M. Daumb, M. Fertla,b,1, B. Frankea,b,2, P. Geltenborth, K. Greend,i, M. G. D. van der Grintend,i, Z. Grujicj, P. G. Harrisi, W. Heilk, V. Helaine´ b,e, R. Henneckb, M. Horrasa,b, P. Iaydjievd,3, S. N. Ivanovd,4, M. Kasprzakj, Y. Kerma¨ıdicl, K. Kircha,b, A. Knechtb, H.-C. Kochj,k, J. Krempela, M. Kuzniak´ b,f,5, B. Laussb, T. Leforte, Y. Lemiere` e, A. Mtchedlishvilib, O. Naviliat-Cuncice,6, J. M. Pendleburyi, M. Perkowskif, E. Pierreb,e, F. M. Piegsaa, G. Pignoll, P. N. Prashanthm, G. Quem´ ener´ e, D. Rebreyendl, D. Riesb, S. Roccian, P. Schmidt-Wellenburgb, A. Schnabelg, N. Severijnsm, D. Shiersi, K. F. Smithi,7, J. Voigtg, A. Weisj, G. Wyszynskia,f, J. Zejmaf, J. Zennera,b,o, G. Zsigmondb aETH Z¨urich, Institute for Particle Physics, CH-8093 Z¨urich, Switzerland bPaul Scherrer Institute (PSI), CH–5232 Villigen-PSI, Switzerland cHans Berger Department of Neurology, Jena University Hospital, D-07747 Jena, Germany dRutherford Appleton Laboratory, Chilton, Didcot, Oxon OX11 0QX, United Kingdom eLPC Caen, ENSICAEN, Universit´ede Caen, CNRS/IN2P3, Caen, France fMarian Smoluchowski Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian University, 30–059 Cracow, Poland gPhysikalisch Technische Bundesanstalt, Berlin, Germany hInstitut Laue–Langevin, Grenoble, France iDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton BN1 9QH, United Kingdom jPhysics Department, University of Fribourg, CH-1700 Fribourg, Switzerland kInstitut f¨urPhysik, Johannes–Gutenberg–Universit¨at,D–55128 Mainz, Germany lLPSC, Universit´eGrenoble Alpes, CNRS/IN2P3, Grenoble, France mInstituut voor Kern– en Stralingsfysica, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, B–3001 Leuven, Belgium nCSNSM, Universit´eParis Sud, CNRS/IN2P3, Orsay Campus, France oInstitut f¨urKernchemie, Johannes-Gutenberg-Universitat, D-55128 Mainz, Germany Abstract The neutron gyromagnetic ratio has been measured relative to that of the 199Hg atom with an uncertainty of 0:8 ppm.
    [Show full text]
  • Gyromagnetic Ratio Importance of Magnetic Resonance History of Magnetic Resonance
    Lecture 1: Introduction Lecture aims to explain: 1. History and importance of magnetic resonance 2. Magnetic moment and angular momentum 3. Simple resonance theory 4. Gyromagnetic ratio Importance of magnetic resonance History of magnetic resonance First nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) experiments followed a long line of research in related fields, and were described and carried out on LiCl molecular beams by Isidor Rabi in USA in 1938. In order for the spin of an atomic nucleus to be determined via Rabi’s technique, a sample needed to be vaporized and then exposed to a magnetic field. See details at www.magnet.fsu.edu/education/tutorials/pioneers/ Felix Bloch and Edward Purcell, working independently of each other in USA, expanded the technique for use on liquids and solids. Rabi was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics for his work in 1944. Bloch and Purcell shared the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1952. Applications of magnetic resonance Determination of atomic and molecular structure, chemical composition Use in analytical chemistry, biochemistry, oil industry See examples at http://www.bruker.com/index.php?id=4816 http://www.process-nmr.com/fox-app/crd_blndng.htm Applications of magnetic resonance Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) Primary use in medicine Available in many hospitals, requires strong non-uniform magnetic field MRI image of the brain can now be used to understand brain activity 2003 Nobel Prize for Medicine awarded to Peter Mansfield and Paul Lauterbur Applications of magnetic resonance Advanced experiments in nanostructures
    [Show full text]
  • Fundamental Physical Constants — Extensive Listing Relative Std
    2018 CODATA adjustment From: http://physics.nist.gov/constants Fundamental Physical Constants — Extensive Listing Relative std. Quantity Symbol Value Unit uncert. ur UNIVERSAL speed of light in vacuum c 299 792 458 m s−1 exact 2 −6 −2 −10 vacuum magnetic permeability 4pα¯h=e c µ0 1:256 637 062 12(19) × 10 NA 1:5 × 10 −7 −2 −10 µ0=(4p × 10 ) 1:000 000 000 55(15) NA 1:5 × 10 2 −12 −1 −10 vacuum electric permittivity 1/µ0c 0 8:854 187 8128(13) × 10 F m 1:5 × 10 −10 characteristic impedance of vacuum µ0c Z0 376:730 313 668(57) Ω 1:5 × 10 Newtonian constant of gravitation G 6:674 30(15) × 10−11 m3 kg−1 s−2 2:2 × 10−5 G=¯hc 6:708 83(15) × 10−39 (GeV=c2)−2 2:2 × 10−5 Planck constant∗ h 6:626 070 15 × 10−34 J Hz−1 exact 4:135 667 696 ::: × 10−15 eV Hz−1 exact ¯h 1:054 571 817 ::: × 10−34 J s exact 6:582 119 569 ::: × 10−16 eV s exact ¯hc 197:326 980 4 ::: MeV fm exact 1=2 −8 −5 Planck mass (¯hc=G) mP 2:176 434(24) × 10 kg 1:1 × 10 2 19 −5 energy equivalent mPc 1:220 890(14) × 10 GeV 1:1 × 10 5 1=2 32 −5 Planck temperature (¯hc =G) =k TP 1:416 784(16) × 10 K 1:1 × 10 3 1=2 −35 −5 Planck length ¯h=mPc = (¯hG=c ) lP 1:616 255(18) × 10 m 1:1 × 10 5 1=2 −44 −5 Planck time lP=c = (¯hG=c ) tP 5:391 247(60) × 10 s 1:1 × 10 ELECTROMAGNETIC elementary charge e 1:602 176 634 × 10−19 C exact e=¯h 1:519 267 447 ::: × 1015 AJ−1 exact −15 magnetic flux quantum 2p¯h=(2e) Φ0 2:067 833 848 ::: × 10 Wb exact 2 −5 conductance quantum 2e =2p¯h G0 7:748 091 729 ::: × 10 S exact −1 inverse of conductance quantum G0 12 906:403 72 ::: Ω exact 9 −1 Josephson constant 2e=h
    [Show full text]
  • A Measurement of the Neutron to 199Hg Magnetic Moment Ratio
    A measurement of the neutron to 199Hg magnetic moment ratio Article (Published Version) Afach, S, Baker, C A, Ban, G, Bison, G, Bodek, K, Burghoff, M, Chowdhuri, Z, Daum, M, Fertl, M, Franke, B, Geltenbort, P, Green, K, van der Grinten, M G D, Grujic, Z, Harris, P G et al. (2014) A measurement of the neutron to 199Hg magnetic moment ratio. Physics Letters B, 739. pp. 128- 132. ISSN 0370-2693 This version is available from Sussex Research Online: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/51038/ This document is made available in accordance with publisher policies and may differ from the published version or from the version of record. If you wish to cite this item you are advised to consult the publisher’s version. Please see the URL above for details on accessing the published version. Copyright and reuse: Sussex Research Online is a digital repository of the research output of the University. Copyright and all moral rights to the version of the paper presented here belong to the individual author(s) and/or other copyright owners. To the extent reasonable and practicable, the material made available in SRO has been checked for eligibility before being made available. Copies of full text items generally can be reproduced, displayed or performed and given to third parties in any format or medium for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge, provided that the authors, title and full bibliographic details are credited, a hyperlink and/or URL is given for the original metadata page and the content is not changed in any way.
    [Show full text]
  • Fundamental Constants
    Appendix A Fundamental Constants Table A.1 Fundamental constants Quantity & symbol CGS MKS (SI) Speed of light in vacuum c 2.997925 1010 cm sec−1 108 ms−1 −7 −6 −1 Magnetic constant μ0 = 4π × 10 1.25664 10 Hm (permeability of free space) 2 −12 −1 Electric constant 0 = 1/μ0c 8.8541853 10 Fm (permittivity of free space) Electron charge e 1.60219 10−19 C 4.80324 10−10 esu Electron volt eV 1.60219 10−12 erg eV−1 10−19 JeV−1 −28 −31 Electron rest mass m0 9.10956 10 gm 10 kg Planck’s constant h 6.626196 10−27 erg sec 10−34 Js Planck’s constant = h/2π 1.05459 10−27 erg sec 10−34 Js 2 2 −8 −10 Bohr radius a0 = 4π0 /m0e 0.529177 10 cm 10 m = 2 2 Rydberg constant Ry /2m0a0 13.6058 eV eV Fine structure constant 7.297351 10−3 10−3 2 α = e /20hc 23 −1 23 −1 Avogadro’s constant L,NA 6.022169 10 mol 10 mol 25 −3 Loschmidt’s constant NL 2.68719 10 m −16 −1 −23 −1 Boltzmann’s constant kB = R/L 1.380622 10 erg K 10 JK Faraday constant F = Le 9.64867 104 Cmol−1 7 −1 −1 −1 −1 Universal gas constant R = LkB 8.31435 10 erg K mol JK mol Mechanical equivalent of heat 4.184 107 erg cal−1 J cal−1 −21 −1 −24 −1 Bohr magneton μB = e/2m0c 9.2741 10 erg G 10 JT −24 −27 Proton rest mass mp 1.67251 10 gm 10 kg −24 −1 −27 −1 Nuclear magneton μN = e/2mpc 5.0508 10 erg G 10 JT −24 −27 Neutron rest mass mn 1.67492 10 gm 10 kg Stefan-Boltzmann constant 5.6697 10−8 Wm−2 K−4 = 5 4 3 2 σ 2π kB /15h c Y.
    [Show full text]