Ejge Paper Styles

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ejge Paper Styles Overburden of Meteorite Impact Crater at Bukit Bunuh, Lenggong, Perak (Malaysia) using 2-D Resistivity Imaging Dr. M.M. Nordiana Lecturer, Geophysics Section, School of Physics, 11800 Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia e-mail: [email protected] Dr. Rosli Saad Senior Lecturer Geophysics Section, School of Physics, 11800 Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia e-mail:[email protected] Dr. Mokhtar Saidin Professor, Centre for Global Archeological Research Malaysia, 11800 Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia e-mail:[email protected] Noer El Hidayah Ismail Postgraduate Student, Centre for Global Archeological Research Malaysia, 11800 Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia e-mail:[email protected] Andy A. Bery Postgraduate Student, Geophysics Section, School of Physics, 11800 Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia e-mail: [email protected] Ragu Ragava Rao Postgraduate Student, Geophysics Section, School of Physics, 11800 Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT 2-D resistivity method is to measure the apparent resistivity of the subsurface at Bukit Bunuh, Lenggong, Perak (Malaysia) along North-South (8 km), West-East (8 km), Northwest- Southeast (6.61 km) and Southwest-Northeast (1.84 km). The survey line was covered using Pole-dipole array with 5 m minimum electrode spacing. The purpose of the 2-D resistivity method was to detect structure and fracture of the shallow subsurface, map hard and compact granite bodies (bedrock) from the overburden material at the meteorite impact area. The results show the first zone with resistivity value of 10-800 ohm-m and thickness 5-60 m was interpreted as alluvium consist of boulders (weathered granite) with resistivity value of >6000 ohm-m. The second zone with resistivity value >20 000 ohm-m was granitic bedrock. Based - 363 - Vol. 19 [2014], Bund. B 364 on the 2-D resistivity imaging results, fractures and faults were identified within the granitic bedrock and other potential areas of poor rock quality. KEYWORDS: 2-D resistivity imaging, Bukit Bunuh, meteorite impact, fracture, overburden INTRODUCTION Bukit Bunuh is situated in Lenggong valley, north of Kota Tampan, Perak state, Malaysia. Generally the Lenggong valley consists of few lithologies which are alluvium, tefra dust and granitic rock. Most of alluvium units are situated along the river area where the quaternary sediment consist of alluvium and tefra dust. The granitic rock is from Jurassic end-Carbonaceous low era being dominated the whole of Lenggong valley and originated from Bintang Range at the west of Lenggong (Mokhtar, 1993). The topography is exceeding 600ft MSL. Sungai Perak is situated at 61ft MSL, flows from north to south and situated at the east of Bukit Bunuh. Bukit Bunuh consists of the older granitic rock. The granite intrusion was occurred throughout Malaysia at Mesozoic era which is 200MY ago (Alexander, 1962). Pebbles dominated by quartz and quartzite are found at the elevation 200-350ft in Lawin, Bukit Jawa, Kampung Telemong and Kota Tampan. Colluviums found at the lower zone (<600ft) are characterized by a lots of fractures and fault zones. The rocks physical characteristics shows that they are fractured and angled fractured include chert, flint and agate. The ground resistivity is related to various geological parameters such as mineral and fluid content, porosity and degree of water saturation in the rock. Variations in electrical resistivity may indicate changes in composition, layer or contaminant levels (Loke, 1994). 2-D RESISTIVITY IMAGING METHOD The resistivity measurements are normally made by injecting current into the ground through two current electrodes, C1 and C2 and measuring the resulting voltage difference at two potential electrodes, P1 and P2 (Figure 1). The resistivity of a soil or rock is dependent on several factors that include amount of interconnected pore water, porosity, amount of total dissolved solid such as salts and mineral composition such as clays. The 2D resistivity method is described by (Zohdya et al, 1974; Sumner, 1976; Reynolds, 1997; and Rubin and Hubbard, 2006). The resistivity method basically measures the resistivity distribution of the subsurface materials. Table 1 shows the resistivity value of some typical rocks and soil materials (Keller and Frischknecht, 1996). Igneous and metamorphic rocks typically have high resistivity values. The resistivity of these rocks is mainly dependent on the degree of fracturing. Since the water table in Vol. 19 [2014], Bund. B 365 Malaysia is generally shallow, the fractures are commonly filled with ground water. The greater the fracturing, the lower is the resistivity value of the rock. I V C1 P1 P2 C2 Equipotential surfaces Current lines Figure 1: Four-point electrode configuration in a two-layer model of resistivity, ρ1 and ρ2. I, current; U, voltage; C, current electrode; P, potential electrode (Modified from Said, 2007). Table 1: Resistivity values of common rocks and soil materials (Keller and Frischknecht, 1996). Material Resistivity (ohm-m) Alluvium 10 to 800 Sand 60 to1000 Clay 1 to 100 Groundwater (fresh) 10 to 100 Sandstone 8 - 4 x 103 Shale 20 - 2 x 103 Limestone 50 – 4 x 103 Granite 5000 to 1,000,000 LITERATURE REVIEW A seismic reflection and three-dimensional wide angle tomographic study of a buried, ~200 km diameter, Chicxulub impact crater in Mexico reveals the kinematics of central structural uplift and peak-ring formation during large crater collapse. The seismic data show downward/inward radial collapse of the transient cavity in the outer crater, and upward/outward collapse within the central structurally uplifted region. Peak rings are formed by the interference between these two flow regimes, and involve significant radial transportation of material. Hydrocode modeling Vol. 19 [2014], Bund. B 366 replicates the observed collapse features. Impact-generated melt rocks lie mostly inside the peak ring; the melt appears to be clast-rich and differentiated, with a maximum thickness of 3.5 km at the center (Morgan et al., 2000). Eduardo et al. (2010) presented initial results of subsurface fracturing and deformation study in the Chicxulub crater from seismic reflection data. The analysis is based on the instantaneous seismic attributes envelope amplitude, instantaneous frequency and Q factor, at selected sectors of the crater by looking at petrophysical properties and seismic attenuation. Shock effects with shattering and fracturing of Mesozoic target rocks show a decreasing trend, away from the rim zone. Cretaceous carbonates show less attenuation inside the crater than in exterior sectors. The relative attenuation quality factor, Q is lower in sections outside the crater rim compared to inside the rim, and particularly at depth within the Crataceous sequence. Carbonates in the western sector are characterized by slightly larger attenuation than in the eastern sector, suggesting radial asymmetries in fracturing and deformation within Chicxulub. Located in Northern Alberta, the Steen River structure (~25 km diameter) is the largest known impact crater remnant in the Western Canadian sedimentary basin. Current hydrocarbon production is ~800 barrels of oil per day (bopd) and 30 million cubic feet per day (MMcf/d) gas, mostly from the Keg River and Slave Point Formations, over a fraction of the crater rim. The feature is buried under ~200 m of Creataceous cover and has no apparent surface expression. Thus, Mazur et al. (2002) used geophysical and drilling techniques to explore the structure. All of the known reservoirs are within the rim uplift where structural closures are on the order of 50 m vertical. In an attempt to image such areas, more than 150 seismic reflection lines have been acquired around the rim since the late 1960s. Generally, these lines show coherent reflections up to the rim uplift with little to no seismic coherency interior to the crater’s rim. At least four of the more than 50 wells drilled around the structure have revealed false highs produced by velocity pull-up effects, possibly related to horizontal velocity contrasts close to the Cretaceous unconformity. Refraction seismology techniques are being tried to help characterize these difficult areas that currently present significant exploration challenges. Noh et al. (2010) discussed magnetic gradiometer survey to analyze the subsurface structure correspond to the crater. Gradiometer is one of the components in geophysical magnetic method and it can measure the local disturbances in the earth’s magnetic field cause by the presence of magnetic materials. Therefore, the quantification of sand variation concentration of magnetic grains in rock can be defined. The study site was in Bukit Bunuh, the northern state of Perak, Malaysia. Archeological research shows the evidence of shock metamorphisms (suevite breccias) and crater morphology (Bukit Bunuh rings). There were eight survey lines with a maximum of 100 m station spacing has been conducted usinng 0.9 m magnetic sensor spacing. The data were interpreted both qualitatively and quantitatively. The qualitatively interpretation is based on anomalies signature on the contour maps, and quantitative interpretation is based on data Vol. 19 [2014], Bund. B 367 modeling. Few borehole data and other geophysical methods such as gravity and resistivity surveys have been carried out for monitoring and verification purpose. Thus, by comparing all the result, the preface of the crater structure was confirmed. Donald et al. (2000) described,
Recommended publications
  • The High-Pressure Mineral Inventory of Shock Veins from the Steen River Impact Structure
    46th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference (2015) 2512.pdf The high-pressure mineral inventory of shock veins from the Steen River impact structure. Walton E.L., Sharp T. G. and Hu J. 1MacEwan University, Department of Physical Sciences, 10700 104 Ave, Edmonton, AB, T5J 2S2, Canada ([email protected] / [email protected] ), 2University of Alberta, Department of Earth & Atmospheric Sciences, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2E3, Canada. 3Arizona State University, School of Earth & Space Ex- ploration,Tempe, AZ 85287-1404, USA. Introduction: The Steen River impact struc- equipped with five WDS spectrometers. Raw data ture (SRIS; 59o31'N, 117o39’W) is a buried complex were corrected using the ZAF procedure. The excel crater with an apparent diameter of ~25 km [1]. The spreadsheets of [6,7] where used to recast chemical SRIS is the largest known impact structure in the analyses of amphiboles and garnets following the IMA Western Canada Sedimentary Basin and is a producer reccomentations. Micro-Raman spectra of various and host of oil and gas reservoirs [1]. The target rocks phases were obtained with point measurements, using comprise a 70 m layer of Missippian calcareous shale a Bruker SENTERRA instrument. The 100X objective underlain by a thick (1530 m) sequence of Devonian of a petrographic microscope was used to focus the marine sedimentary rocks including carbonates and excitation laser beam (532 nm line of Ar+ laser) to a evaporates. This ~1.6 km thick sedimentary cover focal spot size of ~1 µm. TEM sections will be pre- overlies Precambrian basement rocks (primarily gran- pared using an FEI Nova200 NanoFab dual-beam FIB, ite / gneiss / granodiorite).
    [Show full text]
  • Remove This Report from Blc8. 25
    .:WO _______CUfe\J-&£sSU -ILtXJZ-.__________ T REMOVE THIS REPORT FROM BLC8. 25 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY This report is preliminary and has not been edited or reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey standards and nomenclature. Prepared by the Geological Survey for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration U )L Interagency Report: 43 GUIDE TO THE GEOLOGY OF SUDBURY BASIN, ONTARIO, CANADA (Apollo 17 Training Exercise, 5/23/72-5/25/72) by I/ 2/ Michael R. Dence , Eugene L. Boudette 2/ and Ivo Lucchitta May 1972 Earth Physics Branch Dept. of Energy, Mines & Resources Ottawa, Canada 21 Center of Astrogeology U. S. Geological Survey Flagstaff, Arizona 86001 ERRATA Guide to the geology of Sudbury Basin, Ontario, Canada by Michael R. Dence, Eugene L. Boudette, and Ivo Lucchitta Page ii. Add "(photograph by G. Mac G. Boone) 11 to caption. iii. P. 2, line 5; delete "the" before "data", iv. P. 1, line 3; add "of Canada, Ltd." after "Company", iv. P. 1, line 7; delete "of Canada" after "Company". v. Move entire section "aerial reconnaissance....etc..." 5 spaces to left margin. 1. P. 2, line 6; add "moderate to" after "dips are". 1. P. 2, line 13; change "strike" to "striking". 2. P. 1, line 2; change "there" to "these". 2. P. 2, line 7; change "(1) breccias" to "breccias (1)". 2. P. 3, line 3; add "slate" after "Onwatin". 4. P. 1, line 7; change "which JLs" to "which are". 7. P. 1, line 9; add "(fig. 3)" after "surveys". 7. P.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Chronology for the Moon and Mercury
    A new chronology for the Moon and Mercury Simone Marchi German Aerospace Center (DLR), Institute of Planetary Research, Rutherfordstr. 2, D-12489 Berlin Dipartimento di Astronomia, Universit`adi Padova, Vicolo dell’Osservatorio 2, I-35122 Padova [email protected] Stefano Mottola German Aerospace Center (DLR), Institute of Planetary Research, Rutherfordstr. 2, D-12489 Berlin Gabriele Cremonese INAF, Osservatorio Astronomico di Padova, Vicolo dell’Osservatorio 3, I-35122 Padova Matteo Massironi Dipartimento di Geoscienze, Universit`adi Padova, via Giotto 1, I-35137, Padova and Elena Martellato INAF, Osservatorio Astronomico di Padova, Vicolo dell’Osservatorio 3, I-35122 Padova ABSTRACT In this paper we present a new method for dating the surface of the Moon, obtained by modeling the incoming flux of impactors and converting it into a size distribution of resulting craters. We compare the results from this model with the standard chronology for the Moon showing their similarities and discrepancies. In particular, we find indications of a non-constant impactor flux in the last 500 Myr and also discuss the implications of our findings for the Late Heavy Bombardment hypothesis. We also show the potential of our model for accurate dating of other inner Solar System bodies, by applying it to Mercury. arXiv:0903.5137v1 [astro-ph.EP] 30 Mar 2009 Subject headings: solar system: general — planets and satellites: Earth, Mercury, Moon 1. Introduction the evolution of the Solar System and in particu- lar of our own planet, the Earth. Recently, thanks Craters are among the most spectacular surface to a fleet of new space missions (Mars Express features of the solid bodies of the Solar System.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cratered Earth
    Lunar and Planetary Science XXXIII (2002) sess33.pdf Tuesday, March 12, 2002 POSTER SESSION I 7:00–9:30 p.m. Gymnasium The Cratered Earth Ormö J. Rossi A. P. Komatsu G. Marchetti M. De Santis A. The Discovery of a Probable Well-preserved Impact Crater Field in Central Italy [#1075] We propose the first impact craters found in Italy. They form a crater field with about 17 craters in the range 2- 20 m, and a main crater 140x115 m. It represents a rare example of well-preserved explosion craters formed in unconsolidated targets. Rossi A. P. Seven Possible New Impact Structures in Western Africa Detected on ASTER Imagery [#1309] Seven possible impact structures have been found in W Africa on ASTER images. Their diameters vary from few hundreds of meters up to few kilometers. They are located in Mauritania, Mali and Niger, on a sedimentary or metamorphic bedrock. Miura Y. Hirota A. Gorton M. Kedves M. Impact-related Events on Active Tectonic Regions Defined by Its Age, Shocked Minerals and Compositions [#1231] New type of impact-related event is defined at active tectonic region by using semi-circular structure, bulk XRF compositions with mixed data, shocked quartz grains with the PDFs texture, and Fe-Ni content. Example is discussed in Takamatsu MKT crater in Japan. Krochuk R. V. Sharpton V. L. Overview of Terny Astrobleme (Ukrainian Shield) Studies [#1832] A brief summary of Terny astrobleme observations, including history, petrographic and mineralogical evidences of impact, structure of the crater at current erosion level. Pesonen L. J. Reimold W. U.
    [Show full text]
  • The Geological Record of Meteorite Impacts
    THE GEOLOGICAL RECORD OF METEORITE IMPACTS Gordon R. Osinski Canadian Space Agency, 6767 Route de l'Aeroport, St-Hubert, QC J3Y 8Y9 Canada, Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT 2. FORMATION OF METEORITE IMPACT STRUCTURES Meteorite impact structures are found on all planetary bodies in the Solar System with a solid The formation of hypervelocity impact craters has surface. On the Moon, Mercury, and much of Mars, been divided, somewhat arbitrarily, into three main impact craters are the dominant landform. On Earth, stages [3] (Fig. 2): (1) contact and compression, (2) 174 impact sites have been recognized, with several excavation, and (3) modification. A further stage of more new craters being discovered each year. The “hydrothermal and chemical alteration” is also terrestrial impact cratering record is critical for our considered as a separate, final stage in the cratering understanding of impacts as it currently provides the process (e.g., [4]), and is also described below. only ground-truth data on which to base interpretations of the cratering record of other planets and moons. In this contribution, I summarize the processes and products of impact cratering and provide and an up-to-date assessment of the geological record of meteorite impacts. 1. INTRODUCTION It is now widely recognized that impact cratering is a ubiquitous geological process that affects all planetary objects with a solid surface (e.g., [1]). One only has to look up on a clear night to see that impact structures are the dominant landform on the Moon. The same can be said of all the rocky and icy bodies in the solar system that have retained portions of their earliest crust.
    [Show full text]
  • Earth, Solar System, Milky
    PAA Novice Astronomy Curriculum 1. An Introduction to Astronomy – June 7, 2019 Our Cosmic Address : Earth, Solar System, Milky Way, Local Group, Virgo Supercluster, Universe Overview of visible objects Sampling of exotic objects: black holes, dark energy, dark matter 2. Stars – September 6, 2019 Sun: birth, nuclear fusion, parts, Sun spots, atmosphere, space weather, death Colour & Temperature: OBAFGKM Size comparison: include link to YouTube video Distance H/R diagram Variable stars Life cycle of stars smaller and larger than our Sun Take Away: Plans to build a sundial 3. The Solar System – October 4, 2019 Sun and 8 planets: size (use scale model), distance (use scale model), physical characteristics Moons Origins of life Best possibilities of life in our solar system: Mars, Europa, Enceladus Dwarf Planets Comets Asteroids Meteoroid, Meteor, Meteorite 4. The Sun, Earth, Moon System – November 1, 2019 Day & Night Solar eclipse (use model) Lunar eclipse (use model) Lunar phases Influence of Moon on Earth: tides, stabilizing influence, retreating Seasons 5. The Moon – December 6, 2019 Birth: “Big Splat” Theory Evolution of Luna Historical exploration: Russian, American (Apollo 8-17) Current exploration: Chinese, ESA, etc. Discoveries: water ice, etc. Future? : Space station, habitation 6. The Electromagnetic Spectrum – January 3, 2020 Image of EMS Visible light 400-700 nm Infrared Microwave Radio Ultraviolet X-rays Gamma rays 7. Constellations-- -February 7, 2020 What is a constellation? What is an asterism? Historical significance: mythology (include story from more than Greek & Roman), agriculture, navigation and sea faring Seasonal Change Constellations as pointers 8. Eyepieces – March 6, 2020 eye relief 1 1/4” 2” Barlows Neutral Density filters Photographic filters Nebula filters: UHC, Skyglow, OIII, H alpha 9.
    [Show full text]
  • LIST of ASTROBLEMS/IMPATC STRUCTURES IDENTIFIED on EARTH SURFACE Third Edition of the Geological Map of the World, Sheet 1 Physi
    LIST OF ASTROBLEMS/IMPATC STRUCTURES IDENTIFIED ON EARTH SURFACE Third edition of the Geological Map of the World, sheet 1 Physiography, volcanoes, astroblemes, at 1:50 000 000 - Compilator: Philippe Bouysse, 2006 Sources: 1. (Roman type) Site: <http://www.unb.ca/passc/ImpactDatabase>, April 2006 By John Spray & Jason Hines, Planetary And Space Science Centre (PASSC) University of New Brunswick, Canada (174 structures: number 1 to 174), 2. (Italics) Site: <http://www.somerikko.net/old/geo/imp/impacts.htm>, April 2006 By Jarmo Moilanen (Finland): Impact Structures of the World (since Nov. 1996) (21 structures: a to u) 3. (Bold) In addition: Velingara (Master, Diallo, Kande, Wade, 1999, South Africa/Senegal), Iturralde (T. J. Killeen, Missouri Botanical Garden, Saint Louis, 1995-2006) astroblems and Gilf Kebir impact crater field (Paillou et al., C. R. Géoscience, Paris, vol. 335, 2003). (3 structures) 4. (In red) Tunguska airblast TOTAL: 198 IMPACT STRUCTURES Nota: * = approximate central position DIAMETER N° CRATER NAME LOCATION LATITUDE LONGITUDE Age (Ma)* EXPOSED DRILLED (km) South Australia, 1 Acraman Australia S 32° 1' E 135° 27' 90 ~ 590 Y N a Alamo USA N 37°30' W 116°30' 190 367 - - 2 Ames Oklahoma, U.S.A. N 36° 15' W 98° 12' 16 470 ± 30 N Y 3 Amelia Creek Australia S 20° 55' E 134 ° 50' ~20 1640 - 600 Y N 4 Amguid Algeria N 26° 5' E 4° 23' 0.45 < 0.1 Y N 5 Aorounga Chad, Africa N 19° 6' E 19° 15' 12.6 < 345 Y N 6 Aouelloul Mauritania N 20° 15' W 12° 41' 0.39 3.0 ± 0.3 Y N 7 Araguainha Brazil S 16° 47' W 52° 59' 40 244.40 ± 3.25 Y N 8 Arkenu 1 Libya N 22° 4' E 23° 45' 6.8 < 140 Y N 9 Arkenu 2 Libya N 22° 4' E 23° 45' 10,3 < 140 Y N 10 Avak Alaska, U.S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Terrestrial Impact Structures- a Bibliography 1965-68
    Terrestrial Impact Structures- A Bibliography 1965-68 By JACQUELYN H. FREEBERG GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1320 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1969 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR WALTER J. HICKEL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY William T. Pecora, Director Library of Congress catalog-card No. 74-650225 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 - Price 30 cents paper cover CONTENTS Page Abstract--------------------------------------------------------- 1 Introduction______________________________________________________ 1 Seria~----------------------------------------------------------- 2 Bibliography______________________________________________________ 3· Distribution and general characteristics of impact structures_________ 3: Impact sites___________________________________________________ 12: Agnak Island Oraters _ _ __ _ __ _ __ __ _ __ __ _ _ _ __ __ _ _ __ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ __ 1Z Aouelloul Crater___________________________________________ 12 Arn Valley Craters________________________________________ 12 Barringer Crater__________________________________________ 12 Bass Strait_______________________________________________ 13 Boxhole Crater____________________________________________ 14 Brent Crater______________________________________________ 14 Butare Crater_______________________________________ ------ 14 Campo del Cielo Craters----------------------------------- 14 Carswell Lake structure _________________________ . _ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ 15 Chassenon
    [Show full text]
  • Science Article on Fast-Breaking Items Or Current Topics of General Inter- Some Errors
    Vol. 5, No. 10 October 1995 INSIDE • Aerial Photos by Washburn, p. 200 • Call for Award Nominations, p. 203 • Rocky Mountain Section Meeting, GSA TODAY p. 206 A Publication of the Geological Society of America • Cordilleran Section Meeting, p. 207 Figure 2. Topography of the Manicouagan complex impact The Record of Terrestrial structure, Quebec, Canada. The original diameter of this Impact Cratering 214 ± 1 Ma structure is esti- mated to have been 100 km. Richard Grieve, James Rupert, Janice Smith, Ann Therriault Erosion, however, has removed the rim, and the structure Continental Geoscience Division. Geological Survey of Canada appears as a series of circular Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0Y3, Canada features with positive and nega- tive relief, beginning with a 150-km-diameter outer fracture zone, seen most easily in the western and southern sectors, ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION and culminating in slightly off- center topographic peaks. The Approximately 150 terrestrial The first studies of a terrestrial annular Manicouagan reservoir impact structures are currently impact structure, of the now famous (dark green area slightly left of known, representing a small, biased Meteor or Barringer Crater, Arizona, in center) is ˜65 km in diameter sample of a much larger population. the early 1900s by D. M. Barringer and and at ˜360 m elevation. Eleva- The spatial distribution indicates colleagues, produced more controversy tions in the center are as much as 1100 m (brown). concentrations in cratonic areas— than acceptance. There was, however, a ˜ in particular, ones where there have gradual increase in the number of rec- been active search programs. The ognized small craters with meteorite majority of the known impact struc- fragments until the 1960s, when so- tures are <200 m.y.
    [Show full text]
  • Subsurface of Overburden for Possible Meteorite Impact Crater at Bukit Bunuh, Malaysia Using 2-D Electrical Resistivity Imaging
    Subsurface of Overburden for Possible Meteorite Impact Crater at Bukit Bunuh, Malaysia using 2-D Electrical Resistivity Imaging Mark Jinmin Postgradute Student, Geophysics Section, School of Physics, 11800 Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia e-mail: [email protected] Dr. Rosli Saad Senior Lecturer Geophysics Section, School of Physics, 11800 Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia e-mail:[email protected] Dr. M. Mokhtar Saidin Assoc. Prof., Centre for Global Archeological Research Malaysia, 11800 Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia e-mail:[email protected] Y.C. Kiu Postgradute Student, Geophysics Section, School of Physics, 11800 Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia e-mail: [email protected] Nur Azwin Ismail Postgradute Student, Geophysics Section, School of Physics, 11800 Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT Bukit Bunuh is situated in Lengggong, Perak one of Peninsular Malaysia’s most important areas for archeology that revealed many traces of Malaysia’s prehistory. Geophysical method especially 2-D resistivity imaging method is non-destructive which applied in geo-subsurface study for meteorite impact. The study consists of three stages that are regional study and detail study. Total of fourteen survey lines, which include parallel to Sungai Perak and two mountains ranges, Bintang Range and Titiwangsa Range. Survey lines were executed using Pole-dipole array with 5 m minimum electrode spacing. From every stage, the results show the area consists of two main layers which are alluvium and granitic bedrock. The first zone is alluvium with boulders with resistivity value of 10-800 Ωm while the second zone is granitic bedrock with resistivity value of >1500 Ωm.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Alberta
    University of Alberta An Investigation of the Whitecourt Meteorite Impact Crater (Alberta, Canada) by Randolf Scott Kofman A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Earth and Atmospheric Sciences ©Randolf Scott Kofman Spring 2010 Edmonton, Alberta Permission is hereby granted to the University of Alberta Libraries to reproduce single copies of this thesis and to lend or sell such copies for private, scholarly or scientific research purposes only. Where the thesis is converted to, or otherwise made available in digital form, the University of Alberta will advise potential users of the thesis of these terms. The author reserves all other publication and other rights in association with the copyright in the thesis and, except as herein before provided, neither the thesis nor any substantial portion thereof may be printed or otherwise reproduced in any material form whatsoever without the author's prior written permission. Library and Archives Bibliothèque et Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de l’édition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre référence ISBN: 978-0-494-60030-6 Our file Notre référence ISBN: 978-0-494-60030-6 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non- L’auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library and permettant à la Bibliothèque et Archives Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par télécommunication ou par l’Internet, prêter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des thèses partout dans le loan, distribute and sell theses monde, à des fins commerciales ou autres, sur worldwide, for commercial or non- support microforme, papier, électronique et/ou commercial purposes, in microform, autres formats.
    [Show full text]
  • Nasa Technical Memorandum Nasa Tm-88428 Evolution of A
    NASA TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NASA TM-88428 EVOLUTION OF A METEORITE CRATER AS A PROCESS OF RANDOM DISPLACEMENTS I. T. Zotkin, A. I. Dabizha ,' (NASA-TM-88428) EVOLUTION OF A METEORITE N86-26561 j CRATER AS & PROCESS OF RANDOM DISPLACEMENTS (National Aeronautics and Space : AdministratioE) 18 p HC. A02/BF fl01 CSCL< 08G Unclas G3/46 43341 Translation of "Evolyutsiya meteoritnogo kratera kak protsess sluchaynykh peremeshcheniy," IN: Meteoritika, Akademiya Nauk SSSR, No. 40, 1982, pp. 82-90, &82 -47142) (UDC 551.311) NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20546 JUNE, 1986 STANDARD TITLE PAGE 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Cotolog No. NASA TM-88428 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Dote June 1986 EVOLUTION OF A METEORITE CRATER AS A 6. Performing Organizotion Code PROCESS OF RANDOM DISPLACEMENTS 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Zotkin, I. T. and Dabizha, A. I. 10. Work Unit No. 11. Contract or Grant No. 9. Performing Organization Name and Address NASW-4006 The Corporate Word 13. Type of Report and Period Covered 1102 Arrott Building Pittsburgh, PA 15222 Translation 12. Sponsoring Agency Nome and Address National Aeronautics and Space Administration 14. Sponsoring Agency Code Washington, D.C. 20546 15. Supplementary Notes Translation of "Evolyutsiya meteoritnogo kratera kak protsess sluchaynykh peremeshcheniy,'' IN: Meteoritika,Akademiya Nauk SSSR, • No. 40, 1982, pp. 82-90, (A82-47142) (UDC 551.311) 16. Abstroct An. examination of the ages and sizes of 114 terrestrial impact craters shows that their aging kinetics can be described by the diffusion laws. The macrodiffusion coefficient which determines random displacements of mineral masses on the earth has a mean value of 0.02 sq m/year.
    [Show full text]