Anthem Fellowship at University of Texas Is Renewed

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Anthem Fellowship at University of Texas Is Renewed Volume 10, Number 3, March 2004 Anthem Fellowship at University In the Media: Brook on Fox News; ARI Op-Eds in of Texas Is Renewed Major Newspapers The fellowship for the study of Objectivism Dr. Gotthelf tells Impact that he wrote a On February 14 Dr. Yaron Brook, executive at the University of Texas at Austin, which paper, “Ayn Rand on Concepts, Definitions, and director of the Ayn Rand Institute, was a guest on was established in 2000, has been renewed for Essences,” which was presented at the annual At Large with Geraldo Rivera, which airs on the another three-year term. meeting of The Ayn Rand Society, held in conjunc- top-rated Fox News Channel. The subject of the Established by the Anthem Foundation for tion with the American Philosophical Association, interview was the future of Iraq’s political system. Objectivist Scholarship, the fellowship is the first Eastern Division, meetings on December 28, 2003. A former United States ambassador to Iraq was of its kind. The principal beneficiary has been The paper was part of a panel titled “Ayn Rand on also interviewed during the program. Dr. Brook Dr. Tara Smith, associate professor of philoso- Concepts, Essences, and Scientific Progress.” He is argued that Iraq should become a state that protects phy at the university. In the last three years the currently teaching a course on concepts, essences individual rights, with a constitution modeled after fellowship has sponsored scholarly gatherings, and the objectivity of kinds, which includes sub- that of the United States, and not a state ruled by workshops for graduate students and scholar- stantial coverage of the Objectivist theory. whichever ethnic group constitutes the majority. ships, among other types of support. In November Dr. Gotthelf was invited to * * * Under the auspices of the fellowship, give a guest lecture on Atlas Shrugged to a large From October to March grocery workers in several Objectivist scholars—including introductory philosophy class at the University of California were on strike against three supermarket Dr. Harry Binswanger, Dr. Allan Gotthelf North Carolina at Chapel Hill. The invitation came chains, Albertsons, Kroger and Safeway. The labor and Dr. Darryl Wright—have been visiting from the department of philosophy and the course dispute attracted a great deal of state-wide news instructors at the school. instructor, who was teaching the book. coverage. Commenting on the dispute between the This semester Dr. Smith is teaching a * * * employers and the workers, ARI issued “Exploiters freshman honors seminar titled “Values in Ashland University Joint beneficiaries of the vs. Victims in the Grocery Strike,” an op-ed by the Fiction and Philosophy of Ayn Rand.” As fellowship are Dr. C. Bradley Thompson, professor Elan Journo and Dr. Brian P. Simpson. part of this course, Dr. Shoshana Milgram, a of history and political science, and Dr. John The Los Angeles Times published the article, literature professor at Virginia Tech, will come Lewis, assistant professor of history. Established: under a different title, on January 29. The Times to give two guest lectures on Atlas Shrugged. The three-year fellowships began in 2002. has a circulation of more than one million. Several Plans are underway for another guest lecturer In the spring, thanks to the support of the fel- other newspapers and Web sites also carried it. and for a private workshop at which a number lowship, Dr. Lewis will be Visiting Scholar in the The piece was referred to (and sometimes quoted) of Objectivist scholars can discuss their works Department of Classical Studies at Rice University in several newspaper stories on the strike, most in progress. in Houston, Texas. Dr. Thompson is at work on notably in the British newspaper The Guardian. During this academic year, Dr. Amy Peikoff a book comparing the French and American The full text of the piece is reprinted on page 2. is a visiting lecturer at the school, also under Revolutions, and Dr. Lewis is at work on a book * * * the auspices of the fellowship. Last semester she about homeland defense in history. In January, as the trial of Martha Stewart began, taught an undergraduate course on contemporary A scholarly gathering on business ethics was ARI rereleased “Martha and the Tall Poppies,” moral problems and another (upper division) held at Ashland University last year under the an op-ed by senior writer Robert Tracinski. That course on ethical theories, surveying the role of auspices of the fellowship. article was published by 20 newspapers and Web reason in the ethics of Plato, Aristotle, Kant, the * * * sites, including the Philadelphia Inquirer, Orange Pragmatists and Ayn Rand. This semester she is Drs. John Lewis, Amy Peikoff, Tara Smith County Register and Herald Sun of Australia, again teaching the course on moral problems and and C. Bradley Thompson will be lecturing at reaching a circulation of more than two million. also an upper-division introductory course on Objectivist Summer Conference 2004 in July. It was also reprinted on MarthaTalks.com, theories of knowledge. Mrs. Peikoff has studied Miss Stewart’s personal Web site, which helped at ARI’s Objectivist Academic Center and has bring it to the attention of countless more readers. been an instructor in the program. Peikoff Course Available Online The New York Times on January 25 ran In addition to the fellowship at the If you have yet to register for Dr. Leonard Peikoff’s new a short article, “And in the Right Corner, a University of Texas, the Anthem Foundation has course, “The DIM Hypothesis”—which began on February Defense for Martha Stewart,” that mentioned Mr. established two other fellowships, at Ashland 5—you may still do so. Latecomers are welcome to catch Tracinski’s article among several others posted on University in Ohio and most recently at the up with the class by listening to the online archive of audio MarthaTalks.com. Subsequently, Mr. Tracinski’s University of Pittsburgh. recordings. piece was mentioned in Fortune magazine, the The foundation is a nonprofit organization The teleconference sessions meet at 6 p.m., Pacific Boston Globe and Canada’s Globe and Mail. standard time, on these dates: March 4, 11, 18; April 15, 22, separate from ARI, but shares the Institute’s goal 29; May 6, 13, 20, 27; and June 3 (there were four sessions * * * of promoting the academic study of Objectivism. in February). President Bush in January outlined his plans for The foundation makes grants exclusively to The option of listening to the entire course online may the future of America’s space program, calling universities for teaching, writing and research on be of interest to those whose schedule prevents them from for manned missions to the moon and to Mars. Ayn Rand’s ideas. attending the live teleconference session. In response, we issued an updated version of Based on Dr. Peikoff’s book-in-progress (The DIM Hypoth- esis), the 15-session course looks at how philosophy shapes “Privatize the Space Program” by ARI writer Dr. Updates on Anthem Fellows a culture, analyzing areas as diverse as physics, psychology Robert Garmong. The article was carried by the University of Pittsburgh Dr. Allan Gotthelf, and parenting. A detailed course outline is available on our National Post of Canada, the Philadelphia Inquirer Visiting Professor in the Department of History Web site. and seven other newspapers and Web sites. It and Philosophy of Science, is also on the faculty The registration fee for general participants is $445, and reached a circulation of more than one million. of the Graduate Program in Classics, Philosophy for full-time students it is $245. For the course description In the article Dr. Garmong writes: “Extending and to register, please call 800-365-6552, ext. 239, or visit and Ancient Science. Established: The three-year www.objectivistconferences.com. man’s reach into space is not, as some have appointment began in 2003. continued on page 3 ARI Op-Ed: Exploiters vs. Victims in the Grocery Strike This editorial was produced by the Institute’s op-ed program and published (with some alterations) in the January 29 issue of the Los Angeles Times. The Times used a different title for the piece, “Union Packs Unfair Punch in Grocery Strike.” Several other newspapers and Web sites also carried it. University-Level Courses is flexible: students can work through it in four By Elan Journo and Brian Simpson years, but may take longer if they need to.) on Objectivism Although we seek students who intend The California grocery strike has entered its careers as professional intellectuals, the OAC is Each month Impact suggests readings and other fourth month—and there is no end in sight. also open to auditors—participants who attend resources for fans of Ayn Rand’s fiction who wish Workers are still picketing stores, the shelves are classes but who do not submit assignments to be to learn more about her philosophy, Objectivism. understocked, and profits are dwindling. Talks graded, nor take part in tutorials. between the grocery chains and the United Food Courses that are open to auditors vary from and Commercial Workers’ union have failed to RI’s Objectivist Academic Center offers year to year. They are posted on our Web site resolve the mutually harmful conflict. Why? Auniversity-level courses on Ayn Rand’s in the fall and announced in Impact. Auditors If the union’s demands are outrageous, why philosophy that are available nowhere else. may attend courses in a sequence that suits their can’t the stores walk away? The stores have hired The four-year undergraduate program, which interest. OAC courses are usually scheduled for substitute employees, so evidently some people is meant to supplement rather than replace weekday evenings, starting between 5 and 7 p.m.
Recommended publications
  • Beyond Reductionism: Reconsidering the Right to Privacy
    BEYOND REDUCTIONISM: RECONSIDERING THE RIGHT TO PRIVACY Amy L. Peikoff∗ INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................2 I. A SKETCH OF RAND’S VALIDATION OF INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS...............................................................................................5 II. THE RIGHT TO PROPERTY AS FUNDAMENTAL................................14 III. SHOULD THERE BE A LEGAL RIGHT TO PRIVACY? ........................20 A. Any Law Protecting a Right to Privacy Would be Non-Objective, and Thus Unjust. ..........................................20 B. Laws Directed Specifically at Invasions of Privacy Tend, in Their Application and Proliferation, to Erode Fundamental Rights to Liberty and Property ....................................................................24 ∗ Assistant Professor of Philosophy, United States Air Force Academy, J.D., Univer- sity of California Los Angeles School of Law, Ph.D. in Philosophy, University of Southern California. Thank you to S.A. Lloyd, Tara Smith and participants in the Anthem Foundation Workshop at the University of Texas at Austin, Philosophy Department, Spring 2004, for comments on earlier drafts of this piece. 1 2 N.Y.U. Journal of Law & Liberty [Vol. 3:1 1. “Decisional” Privacy – Roe v. Wade and its progeny.......................................................................................... 26 2 “Informational” Privacy Cases: Eroding the Right to Property .......................................................................... 34 IV. RECOMMENDATION.......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 200306 IMPACT02.Qxd
    Volume 9, Number 6, June 2003 Local Activism: Introducing Ayn Rand’s In the Media: Dr. Brook on PBS In May 2002 Dr. Yaron Brook was a panelist on Books Into Texas Schools The McCuistion Program; the topic was “The Israel-Palestine Conflict: Solutions for Peace.” That program re-aired last month, at various The Houston Objectivism Society (HOS), an At one school she suggested that her times, on PBS and cable channels throughout independent community group that promotes the department obtain copies of Anthem and Ayn the country. study of Ayn Rand’s philosophy, has long Rand’s play Night of January 16th. As a result, supported ARI’s projects. For several years a fellow teacher is using them in class, “because . and on Fox News Channel HOS has amplified the effect of our high school she saw them on the shelves, and she remem- On April 27 Dr. Brook was interviewed on the essay contest on Anthem and The Fountainhead bered me telling her how much my students Fox News Channel show At Large With by sponsoring prizes for contest winners in the enjoyed the books,” said Ms. Wich. Geraldo. He discussed the dangers of an Houston area. Since 1995 the members of HOS Iranian-backed attempt to install an Islamic have given more than $18,000 in scholarship Books Quickly Win Fans Among Students theocracy in post-war Iraq. money to local winners. The overwhelming response to Though the efforts of HOS Anthem and The Fountainhead, . and on C-SPAN have helped to encourage teachers she continued, “was extremely In April Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • July 1 O Through July 22, 2004 General Session Lectures Optional
    July 1O through July 22, 2004 Wintergreen Resort Wintergreen, Virginia General Session Lectures (see pages 4- 5) Optional Courses (see pages 6-9) Confe1l:1\1..-es for the t~Uional mind ARIr''-1~ Ayn Rand Institute YOU ARE INVITED! About Wintergreen Resort igh in Virginia's Blu~ Ridg~, Winterg'.een HResort is a mountaintop hideaway with glorious vistas that seem to go on forever. Here is the ultimate vacation spot-peaceful and refreshing, yet with recreation, lodging Dear Reader: and dining options to suit every taste. A short drive from Charlottesville, Virginia, through I am pleased to announce the 2004 Objectivist Summer Conference highlighted by scenic Nelson County brings you to the foot of lectures by Dr. Harry Binswanger, Dr. John Ridpath, Peter Schwartz and Mary Ann Wintergreen Mountain. As the road winds uphill, Sures. This year's conference will offer fifteen general-session lectures, twenty-one water cascades down rocky streams, passing unique optional courses and workshops, and two evening panels during the two- through groves of mountain laurel and wild week event. rhododendron. As the road climbs, the air grows noticeably cooler and crisper. At the top lies The venue is Wintergreen Resort, located in the beautiful Blue Ridge mountains Wintergreen-you have truly gotten away from it of Virginia, approximately 35 miles southwest of Charlottesville. The resort offers all. No malls, no traffic lights, no commute. The lodge and condominium accommodations, four restaurants, shopping, thirty miles pace has slowed to a relaxing mountain rhythm. of marked hiking paths, two championship golf courses, tennis, swimming, horseback Adjust your attitude to the altitude and begin riding, and a spa and fitness center.
    [Show full text]
  • Conference Schedule
    TALKS PANELS COURSES EVENTS AND MEALS CONFERENCE SCHEDULE Young Adult Weekend Main Conference Friday Saturday Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday SCHEDULE June 27 June 28 June 29 June 30 July 1 July 2 July 3 July 4 Bayer and Rivera: Campus Activism Course: Ghate and Lockitch: and Campus Club 8:40–9:40 AM Bernstein: Introduction to Ayn Rand’s Philosophy, Objectivism War Stories CONCURRENT What Everyone TALKS/PANELS Can Do to Journo: AND A COURSE Promote Freedom DAY 2: DAY 3: The Virtue of DAY 1: DAY 4: Reality and Values and Selfishness in Why Philosophy? Open Q&A Foreign Policy Knowledge Happiness Thompson: Simpson: Brook: Salmieri: Mayhew: Independence Day 10–11:30 AM Lockitch: Self-Interest Cronyism, The Inequality Thinking Ayn Rand’s Celebration TALKS The Sacred Self Rightly Corruption and Debate Objectively Sacred Atheism 10:30–11:30 AM Understood Government Power 11:30 AM–1:30 PM The Undercurrent Introduction to Atlantis Legacy A Tribute to Q&A on Capitalism GROUP LUNCH Students Only Planned Giving Lunch Allan Gotthelf Lunch OR LUNCH ON Lunch Lunch (FREE) (by invitation only) Lunch 11:45 AM–1:15 PM YOUR OWN 11:45 AM–1:30 PM 11:45 AM–1:15 PM 11:45 AM–1:15 PM Smith: Mossoff: Boeckmann: Boeckmann: What Are We Mossoff: Term Limits Romanticism vs. Romanticism vs. Cheering? Sport The Smartphone for Patents and Naturalism and Naturalism and and the Value of Wars and “Patent Copyrights Classicism (part I) Classicism (part II) Trolls”—What They Valuing Mean to You Bayer: Panel: 1:30–2:45 PM Panel: Locke: Milgram: Spreading The Fundamental CONCURRENT Foreign Policy and Free Will vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Mistakes in Competing Theories of Judicial Interpretation
    03__SMITH.DOC 11/1/2007 3:52:25 PM WHY ORIGINALISM WON’T DIE— COMMON MISTAKES IN COMPETING THEORIES OF JUDICIAL INTERPRETATION TARA SMITH* I INTRODUCTION ow should judges interpret the Constitution? What should H guide them in applying it in specific cases? The single best known answer to these questions is Originalism. Originalism is the view, embraced by Antonin Scalia, Robert Bork, Clarence Thomas and many academic legal theorists, that the meaning of the Constitution should be settled by reference to the original understanding of those who enacted its provisions.1 Judges are bound Copyright © 2007 Tara Smith and Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy. * Tara Smith is Professor of Philosophy at the University of Texas at Austin. 1. The influential 18th century British legal thinker William Blackstone offered a broad endorsement of Originalism in WILLIAM BLACKSTONE, 1 COMMENTARIES *59, *61, *91. As representative of contemporary Originalism, see RAOUL BERGER, GOVERNMENT BY JUDICIARY: THE TRANSFORMATION OF THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT (1977); ROBERT BORK, THE TEMPTING OF AMERICA (1990); KEITH E. WHITTINGTON, CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION (1999); Antonin Scalia, Common Law Courts in a Civil-Law System: The Role of United States Federal Courts in Interpreting the Constitution and Laws, in A MATTER OF INTERPRETATION: FEDERAL COURTS AND THE LAW (Amy Gutmann ed. 1997). For a discussion of Originalism’s history, see JONATHAN O’NEILL, ORIGINALISM IN AMERICAN LAW AND POLITICS (2005). Justice Roger B. Taney invoked Originalist principles in Dred Scott v. Sandford, writing that the Constitution “speaks not only with the same words, but with the same meaning and intent with which it spoke when it came from the hands of the framers, and was voted on and adopted by the people of the United States.” 60 U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Ayn Rand's Normative Ethics: the Virtuous Egoist
    P1: KAE 0521860504pre CUNY333B/Smith 0521 86050 4 January 30, 2006 13:22 This page intentionally left blank ii P1: KAE 0521860504pre CUNY333B/Smith 0521 86050 4 January 30, 2006 13:22 Ayn Rand’s Normative Ethics The Virtuous Egoist Ayn Rand is well known for advocating egoism, but the substance of that egoism’s instruction is rarely understood. Far from representing the rejection of morality, selfishness, in Rand’s view, actually demands the practice of a systematic code of ethics. This book explains the fundamental virtues that Rand considers vital for a person to achieve his objective well-being: rationality, honesty, independence, justice, integrity, productiveness, and pride. Tracing Rand’s account of the naturalistic ground of value and the harmony of human beings’ ratio- nal interests, Tara Smith examines what each of these virtues consists in, why it is a virtue, and what it demands of a person in practice. Along the way, she addresses the status of several conventional virtues within Rand’s theory, considering traits such as kindness, charity, generosity, temperance, courage, forgiveness, and humility. Ayn Rand’s Normative Ethics thus offers an in-depth exploration of several specific virtues and an illuminating integration of these with the broader theory of egoism. Tara Smith is professor of philosophy at the University of Texas, Austin. She is the author of Moral Rights and Political Freedom and Viable Values: A Study of Life as the Root and Reward of Morality, and she has contributed to the Journal of Philosophy, American Philosophical Quarterly, Social Philosophy and Policy, and Law and Philosophy.
    [Show full text]
  • Packing the Court Without Changing the Law
    PRAGMATISM AND PRIVACY Amy L. Peikoff* Almost daily, we read in the news about cases in which an in- dividual’s interest in privacy is pitted against various interests of other individuals, the latter often represented by local, state, or na- tional governments. Some recent examples: Google and the CIA both investing in a start-up company “that monitors the web in real time” and uses the information it gathers to “‘assemble actual real- time dossiers on people’”;1 the proliferation of full-body scanning machines at domestic2 and foreign3 airports; the government track- ing, via GPS,4 or searching the data on,5 one’s cell phone, without a * Visiting Fellow for the Study of Objectivism in Law and Philosophy, Chapman University School of Law. JD, UCLA, 1998; PhD (philosophy), University of Southern California, 2003. Thanks to the participants at the 2007 Anthem Conference on Phi- losophy of Law at the University of Texas at Austin, as well as several of my col- leagues at Chapman University School of Law, who provided many helpful com- ments and suggestions on earlier drafts of this paper. 1 Noah Shachtman, Exclusive: Google, CIA Invest in ‘Future’ of Web Monitoring, WIRED: DANGER ROOM (July 28, 2010, 7:30 PM), http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2010/07/exclusive-google-cia. 2 Eileen Sullivan, New Full-Body Scanners Going to 2 Airports in Next 2 Weeks for Pas- senger Screening, ABC NEWS (Feb. 23, 2010), http://abcnews.go.com/Business/wireStory?id=9924831. 3 Paris Airport Starts Using Full-Body Scanner, BREITBART (Feb. 22, 2010, 1:03 PM), http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9E1CE1O0.
    [Show full text]
  • Reaching out to Entrepreneurs Ghampioning the Moral Gase For
    Newsletterof the Ayn Rand@Institute Volume6, Number 5, May 2OOO Reaching Out to Entrepreneurs Tfuoughout the centuries there were men who took fint stepsdown ecutive wrote, "Thank you for your recent letter. I am very interested in Ayn new roads armed with nothing _Ayn but their own vision. Rand Rand's work . I look forward to receiving my copy of Attas Shrugged.', An_ other wrote simply, "Got your letter-I would love a copy of AtlasShrugged." In February ARI launched the Entrepreneur outreach project. Its aim is to Entrepreneurs are a growing and increasingly influential segment of bring Ayn Rand and objectivism to the attention of thousands of successful the business world. As the potential Atlases of tomorrow, they need and de_ entrepreneurs. serve moral encouragement. By making such leaders aware of ARI and Reports from the media and ARI's contributors during the past year building relationships with them early in their careers, we may be able to have told us of scores of young buslness people-particularly in high_tech give them the intellectual ammunition and the spiritual fuel they will need industries-who count Ayn Rand among their favorite authors. The out_ as their businesses grow. reach project seeks to make such fans aware of the Institute's work in defense Dr. Brook noted: "the Entrepreneur Outreach project brings ARI to of reason, egoism, and capitalism. A second purpose of the project is to find the attention of a large and receptive new audience. We will seek to estab_ successful entrepreneurs unfamillar with Miss Rand s writings and introduce lish long-term relationships with many of these individuals; that is, we them to her defense of business and technology and to her portrayal of won't just be sending them a letter and forgetting about them.
    [Show full text]
  • PSUP Uncorrected Proofs
    PRIVACY RIGHTS Proofs PSUP Uncorrected ................. 17691$ $$FM 03-24-10 11:48:56 PS PAGE i Proofs PSUP Uncorrected ................. 17691$ $$FM 03-24-10 11:48:56 PS PAGE ii Adam D. Moore PRIVACY RIGHTS MORAL AND LEGAL FOUNDATIONS Proofs The Pennsylvania State University Press University Park, Pennsylvania PSUP Uncorrected ................. 17691$ $$FM 03-24-10 11:48:56 PS PAGE iii Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Moore, Adam D., 1965– Privacy rights : moral and legal foundations / Adam D. Moore. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. Summary: ‘‘Provides a definition and defense of individual privacy rights. Applies the proposed theory to issues including privacy versus free speech; drug testing; and national security and public accountability’’ —Provided by publisher. ISBN 978-0-271-03685-4 (cloth : alk. paper) 1. Privacy, Right of—United States. 2. Data protection—Law and legislation—United States. 3. Public records—Access control—United States. 4. Freedom of speech—United States. 5. Drug testing—Law and legislation—United States. 6. Intellectual property—United States. I. Title. KF1262.M66 2010 342.7308Ј58—dc22 2009053062 Copyright ᭧ 2010 The Pennsylvania State University All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America Published by The Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park, PA 16802-1003 It is the policy of The Pennsylvania State University Press to Proofs use acid-free paper. Publications on uncoated stock satisfy the minimum requirements of American National Standard for Information Sciences—Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Material, ANSI Z39.48-1992. This book is printed on Natures Natural, which contains 50% post-consumer waste.
    [Show full text]
  • An Interview with Leonard Peikoff UCLA Conference on Freedom
    Volume 16, Number 3, March 2010 UCLA Conference on We the Living and the World Today: Freedom An Interview with Leonard Peikoff RI intellectuals participated in a two-day Dr. Leonard Peikoff was a stu- see the government’s aban- A conference on the philosophic foundations dent and friend of Ayn Rand’s donment in many areas even of freedom at the University of California, Los for more than thirty years. He of the pretense that it respects Angeles, the weekend of January 30–31. The is the author of The Ominous private property or individual conference was put on by LOGIC, the UCLA Parallels and Objectivism: rights. Washington gave its Objectivist club (with financial and material The Philosophy of Ayn Rand, all in the effort to socialize support from ARI), and featured ten talks by the definitive presentation medicine—to be financed eight speakers, as well as a panel discussion and of Ayn Rand’s philosophy. in part through the unprec- a student-led presentation on activism. It was Dr. Peikoff is the featured edented mandating of invol- free and open to the public, and attendees were speaker at Objectivist Summer Conference 2010 untary purchases by Ameri- treated to lunch. in Las Vegas (July 2–11), where he will present cans out of their after-tax money. The proposed six general-session lectures on his forthcoming new environmentalist legislation is a huge blow to book, The DIM Hypothesis. the productive ability of industry, and also to the Impact recently sat down with Dr. Peikoff ability of business to defend its own rights against to discuss Ayn Rand’s first novel, We the Living the politicians’; even if, as it seems at the moment, (1936), and its relevance to America today.
    [Show full text]
  • Clarence Thomas's Jurisprudence Unexplained
    CLARENCE THOMAS’S JURISPRUDENCE UNEXPLAINED Timothy Sandefur* Introduction ..........................................................................................535 I. Unenumerated Rights and Substantive Due Process...................538 II. Federalism.........................................................................................548 III. Originalism......................................................................................553 IV. Conclusion.......................................................................................556 Review of: The Supreme Court Opinions of Clarence Thomas, 1991– 2006: A Conservative’s Perspective by Henry Mark Holzer (Jeffer- son, N.C.: McFarland & Company, 2007) INTRODUCTION Clarence Thomas is the most interesting justice to sit on the Su- preme Court in a generation. His opinions are rigorous, consistent, and unintimidated by the intellectual fads that have swept through the legal elite for the past half century. Despite what some have said, Thomas is not a libertarian by any stretch of the imagination.1 *Senior Staff Attorney, Pacific Legal Foundation; J.D. 2002, Chapman University School of Law; B.A. 1998 Hillsdale College. Thanks to Professor Stephen Cox. 1 See, e.g., Tomiko Brown-Nagin, The Transformative Racial Politics of Justice Tho- mas? The Grutter v. Bollinger Opinion, 7 U. PA. J. CONST. L. 787, 788 (2005) (referring to “Justice Thomas’s ‘originalist’ interpretation of the Constitution and libertarian po- litical philosophy”); William McGeveran, Mrs. McIntyre’s Checkbook:
    [Show full text]